Paper 1
Paper 1
Paper 1
11, which makes them 608 dislocations. Based on the simplied Frank
formula, the spacing of the dislocations can be calculated to be d b=, where is
the misorientation angle between the two grains and is about 68 in the present case.
The calculated spacing between dislocations is 2.42 nm, which agrees very well with
the experimental value of 2.45 nm. The SAGB is therefore well described by the
simplied Frank formula. This SAGB does not contain extrinsic dislocations and
is in equilibrium state.
Figure 4 is another asymmetrical tilt SAGB, and the misorientation angle is
about 68. The Burgers vector of the dislocations in the SAGB is again b
1
2
10
11.
The interesting point in this SAGB is that there are two intersecting SFs on the two
sets of {111} planes crossing the SAGB. As such, the SFs are bent after crossing the
SAGB. This means that the SAGB cannot prevent the propagation of dislocations.
The SFs are apparently generated by dissociation of two 608 dislocations, the cores
of which are indicated by two inverted white-edged black Ts and b
1
and b
2
.
We show how a SAGB is formed by the introduction of dislocations in gure 5.
The GB is outlined by two types of strip (some of which are indicated by white
arrowheads), which extend on the two sets of {111} planes. These strips are actually
SFs or thin twins, which are associated with the dissociation of two 608 dislocations,
1412 J. Y. Huang et al.
Figure 4. An asymmetrical SAGB. The white inverted Ts indicate the core of the GB
dislocations. SF
1
and SF
2
are two intersecting SFs. The Burgers vectors b
1
1
2
10
11
and b
2
1
2
101:
D
o
w
n
l
o
a
d
e
d
b
y
[
M
o
n
t
a
n
u
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
a
e
t
L
e
o
b
e
n
]
a
t
0
2
:
4
9
2
3
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
4
as indicated by Ts in gure 5 (b). These dislocations are slightly dissociated, thus
producing the SFs and thin twins. The misorientation between the two grains is
about 28 because of the introduction of these dislocations. A similar SAGB was
also observed in ball-milled Cu (Huang et al. 1996) and in ECAP-processed Al
Mg (Horita et al: 1996).
Figure 6 shows a SAGB with a misorientation angle of approximately 16.58
reaching the limiting angle for that of a SAGB. The GB is curved and cannot
be described by the simplied Frank formula. However, the Burgers vector of
the GB dislocations is still a lattice vector, which is not the case for a large-
angle grain boundary (LAGB). It is thus reasonable to classify such a GB as a
SAGB. It is noted that for such a SAGB, the lattice is severely distorted in the
GB region.
Figure 7 shows a SAGB with a misorientation of about 108. The lattice spacing is
approximately 1.8 A