0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views9 pages

Determination of CBR Value: Experiment 4

The document describes how to determine the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value of a soil sample through a penetration test. It details the process of mixing a soil sample with water, compacting it in layers, and measuring the force required for penetration at intervals. Graphs of load against penetration are made and CBR values are calculated for top and bottom layers based on standard values. The tested soil was found to have a good CBR value and strength for road construction.

Uploaded by

Adjei Baldan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
93 views9 pages

Determination of CBR Value: Experiment 4

The document describes how to determine the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value of a soil sample through a penetration test. It details the process of mixing a soil sample with water, compacting it in layers, and measuring the force required for penetration at intervals. Graphs of load against penetration are made and CBR values are calculated for top and bottom layers based on standard values. The tested soil was found to have a good CBR value and strength for road construction.

Uploaded by

Adjei Baldan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

DETERMINATION OF CBR VALUE

EXPERIMENT 4
INTRODUCTION
The California bearing ratio (CBR) is a penetration test conducted both in laboratory as well as
insitu for e!aluation of the strength and stability of a soil sa"ple for the construction of roads
or highways# It was de!eloped by the California Depart"ent of Transportation# The results of
the test are e$pressed in %ercentage and are relati!e results# The results are obtained for &#' ""
penetration and ' "" penetration#
The CBR !alue is deter"ined by(
) CBR *+,
) "easured pressure for site soils *N-"".,
) pressure to achie!e e/ual penetration on standard soil *N-"".,
T01 B23IC CBR T13T
This consists of causing a plunger of standard area to penetrate a soil sa"ple4 (this can be in the
laboratory or on site)# The force (load) re/uired to cause the penetration is plotted against
"easured penetration4 the readings noted at regular ti"e inter!als#
This infor"ation is plotted on a standard graph4 and the plot of the test data will establish the
CBR result of the soil tested#
The test is fully co!ered in (
B3 5677 ( 3oils for ci!il engineering purposes(%art 84Co"paction related tests#
9
T01 R123ON :OR T01 CBR T13T
;e are deter"ining the resistance of the subgrade4 (i#e the layer of naturally occurring "aterial
upon which the road is built)4 to defor"ation under the load fro" !ehicle wheels# 1!en "ore
si"ply put4 <0ow strong is the ground upon which we are going to build roads=
2%%2R2TU3
3cale
3teel 3traightedge
Collar 3hall
:ilter %aper
B#3 &#'>g Ra""er
?ould and Base %late
6 tins
3urcharge ;eight (two disc)
&&77#55g and &99&#5'g respecti!ely
%ROC1DUR1
5
1. @ >g of the soil sa"ple was weighed in a tray and "i$ed with A99 "l of water# ?oisture
content was ta>en before "i$ing water (Tin ) 18.35g B *Tin C 3a"ple, ) 53.12g)
2. The "ass of the "ould was recorded together with the base plate# (5559g)
3. The "ould was fitted with collar4 filter paper placed at botto" and then filled with the soil
sa"ple#
4. 2 first layer was put and co"pacted using the 2.5 kg ra""er gi!ing 27 e!enly distributed
blows on the surface#
5. The co"paction was carried out in 6 e/ual layers pro!ided at the end the "ould was filled
abo!e @"" when the collar is re"o!ed#
6. The collar was then re"o!ed and the surplus co"pacted soil tri""ed with the steel
straightedge#
7. The "ass of the "ould4 base plate and co"pacted soil was recorded (D@A6 g)
8. The "ould with the sa"ple was placed in the testing "achine with the top face e$posed#
9. 3urcharge weights of 2277.11g and 22.15g were added and the gauge set to 9 ""#
&
10. The "achine was turned on and readings of force were ta>en at e!ery 9#&'""
penetration up to 7#' ""#
11. Then the "ould was re"o!ed and a portion of the top surface was ta>en for "oisture
content# The hole left by the plunger was then fitted with co"pacted soil#
12. The base plate was then re"o!ed and fi$ed at the top of "ould4 thus penetration on the
botto" part was now recorded using the sa"e procedure fro" step A to step 55#
13. The readings were tabulated in the for" gi!en and graphs of load (EN) against
penetration ("") were plotted for the top and botto" face and CBR calculated using the
standard graph also#


OB31RF2TION3 2ND C2GCUG2TION
?ass of soil ) @ >g
?ass of "ould ) ''A' g
?ass of "ould C Base plate C sa"ple ) D@A6 g
?ass of sa"ple co"pacted ) D@A6 ''A' ) 89DA g
6
B!"k #$%&'()* +
,
-498

.235
- 1.778 Mg./
3
?oisture ) ;eight of sa"ple ;eight of dry sa"ple
) 68#77 &8#@&
) 59#5' g
The initial dry density,H
d
(in Mg/m
3
), of the sample is calculated from the equation
Dry Density4 H
d
) H
b
-(5Cw) I where w is the "oisture content (+)
H
d
)
5#77A -
(5C9#85&&)
)
1.259
Mg./
3
T2BG1 5
Before Test 2fter Test
Top Gayer Botto" layer
;eight of tin-g 5A#6' 5A#&7 5A#D9
;t of sa"ple C tin-g '6#5& 6A#98 '9#'&
;eight of sa"ple-g 68#77 5D#77 65#@&
;t of tin C dry sa"ple-g 8&#D7 6&#'D 85#@&
;eight of dry sa"ple-g &8#@& 58#6& &&#7&
?oisture -g 59#5' '#8' A#D9
?oisture content4 w (+) 85#&6 6A#9@ 6D#57
Dry density4 H
d
(?g-"6) 5#&@ 5#&D 5#&A
T2BG1 &
%enetration of plunger :orce
"" Top gauge Botto" gauge Top-EN Botto" EN
9#&' 59#& D#& 9#5DA 9#57A
9#'9 56#9 D#A 9#&'& 9#5D9
9#7' 5'#9 5&#A 9#&D5 9#&8A
5#99 5A#9 5@#9 9#68D 9#659
5#&' 5D#9 5D#& 9#6@D 9#67&
5#'9 &5#9 &&#9 9#897 9#8&7
5#7' &6#6 &@#9 9#8'& 9#'98
&#99 &'#9 &A#9 9#8A' 9#'86
&#&' &7#9 69#& 9#'&8 9#'A@
&#'9 &D#9 66#9 9#'@6 9#@89
&#7' 65#9 6'#A 9#@95 9#@D'
6#99 66#9 6A#' 9#@89 9#787
6#&' 68#' 85#9 9#@@D 9#7D'
6#'9 6@#' 86#' 9#79A 9#A88
6#7' 6A#' 8@#9 9#787 9#AD&
8#99 89#9 8A#& 9#77@ 9#D6'
8#&' 8&#9 '9#& 9#A5' 9#D78
8#'9 86#' '&#' 9#A88 5#95D
8#7' 8'#' '8#A 9#AA6 5#9@6
'#99 87#' '@#' 9#D&& 5#9D@
'#&' 8D#9 'A#& 9#D'5 5#5&D
'#'9 '5#9 @9#' 9#DAD 5#578
'#7' '6#9 @&#' 5#9&A 5#&56
@#99 ''#9 @8#' 5#9@7 5#&'5
@#&' '@#' @@#6 5#9D@ 5#&A@
@#'9 'A#' @A#5 5#56' 5#6&5
@#7' @9#9 79#9 5#5@8 5#6'A
7#99 @&#9 75#A 5#&96 5#6D6
7#&' @6#' 76#' 5#&6& 5#8&@
7#'9 @@#9 7'#9 5#&A9 5#8''
8
JR2%0
F01 T02 30'"
'
F01 B0((0/ 30'"
R13UGT3
The
standard
Goad fro"
B3 for
&#'"" and
'#9""
penetration
is
interpolated#
The !alues at penetration &#' and '#9 ""4 obtained fro" the plotted graph of Goad-EN against
%enetration ("") were tabulated below and the CBR !alue calculated#
@
3tandard Goad for &#'"" penetration ) 55#' C (57#@ K 55#')-8
) 56#9&' EN
3tandard Goad for '#9"" penetration ) (57#@ C &&#&)-&
) 5D#D EN
T2BG1 6
(5) 2t Top of speci"en(
P$%$(14('0%.// 3(4%#41# "04#.kN L04# 422"'$#.kN CBR 5
2.5 13.25 .563 4.33
5. 19.9 .922 4.63
(&) 2t botto" speci"en
P$%$(14('0%.// 3(4%#41# "04#.kN L04# 422"'$#.kN CBR 5
2.5 13.25 .64 4.92
5. 19.9 1.96 5.51
CBR + for &#'"" penetration at top ) Goad applied - 3tandard load
) (9#'@6 - 56#9&') $ 599
) 8#66+
3a"e procedure applies for '#9""4 hence the table abo!e being filled#
R13UGT3
CBR !alue at &#' "" ) (8#66 C 8#D&)
&
) 8#@6+
) 55 (%$41$&( 1 5)
CBR !alue at '#9 "" ) (8#@6 C '#'5)
&
7
) '#97+
) 55 (%$41$&( 1 5)
CONCGU3ION
The soil tested has an al"ost good CBR !alue and can be considered to ha!e a good strength# In
general a soil of CBR less than &+ is of poor /uality and cannot be used in a road construction#
R1:1R1NC13
http(--www#highways"aintenance#co"-cbrte$t#ht"
http(--www#tpub#co"-content-engineering-58979-css-58979L&77#ht"
B3 56778(5DD9
A

You might also like