0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views1 page

Multiplex Section Protection Vs SNCP

MSP (Multiplex Section Protection) protects individual transmission lines using a backup protection line. There are two main MSP protection schemes: 1+1 and 1:N. 1+1 protects one working line using another protection line through simultaneous transmission. 1:N protects N working lines but can only switch one line at a time to the additional protection line. SNC (Subnetwork Connection Protection) is a per-path protection mechanism for SDH networks. It transmits data on two different ring paths and the node selector switches to the better quality path. SNC uses a 1+1 protection scheme where traffic is broadcast on one working and one protection route and the node selector switches between them.

Uploaded by

Santhosh Madhu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views1 page

Multiplex Section Protection Vs SNCP

MSP (Multiplex Section Protection) protects individual transmission lines using a backup protection line. There are two main MSP protection schemes: 1+1 and 1:N. 1+1 protects one working line using another protection line through simultaneous transmission. 1:N protects N working lines but can only switch one line at a time to the additional protection line. SNC (Subnetwork Connection Protection) is a per-path protection mechanism for SDH networks. It transmits data on two different ring paths and the node selector switches to the better quality path. SNC uses a 1+1 protection scheme where traffic is broadcast on one working and one protection route and the node selector switches between them.

Uploaded by

Santhosh Madhu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

MSP(Multiplex Section Protection) is a per span protection.

A service line is protected using another line, called a protection line. If an error occurs, the protection mechanism should switch
over to the protection line. There are two main protection schemes for the multiplex section
! "#" Traffic is simultaneousl$ transmitted over wor%ing and protecting lines (or cards if it is for hiT i.e. MSP &ridge). The incoming
traffic is select from the line that delivers signal in &est condition (specificall$ switch fa&ric selector is responsi&le for ma%ing the
selection in a 'iT).
o Switching t$pe unidirectional or &i(directional
o )peration t$pe revertive or non(revertive
! "* A "* multiplex section protection s$stem consists of * traffic(carr$ing multiplex sections that are to &e protected &$ an
additional multiplex section. In this scheme onl$ one of the wor%ing sections can &e protect at a time. The additional multiplex
section can &e used to carr$ low(priorit$ traffic (unprotected) when it is not used as a protection section for the rest * wor%ing
sections.
o "* with *+,"- for STM(".-."/ and *+,0 for STM("/./-
o Switching t$pe &i(directional
o )peration t$pe revertive
! "" This is a special case of "* protection scheme. In case of a failure on the wor%ing path, traffic is switched to protecting path.
o Switching t$pe &i(directional
o )peration t$pe revertive
Su&*etwor% 1onnection Protection. is a per path protection.
S*1P is a networ% protection mechanism for S2' networ%s providing path protection (end(to(end protection). The data signal is
transmitted in a ring structure via two different paths and can &e implemented in line or ring structures. The changeover criteria are
specified individuall$ when configuring a networ% element. A protection protocol is not re3uired. The switchover to protection path
occurs in the non(revertive mode, i.e. if traffic was switched to the protection path due to a transmission fault, there is no automatic
switch(&ac% to the original path once the fault is rectified, &ut onl$ if there is a fault on the new path (the one la&eled as 4protecting5
and currentl$ services traffic).
S*1P is a "#" protection scheme (one wor%ing and one protection transport entit$). Input traffic is &roadcasted in two routes (one
&eing the normal wor%ing route and the second one &eing the protection route).
Assume a failure free state for a path from a node 6 to a node A. *ode 6 &ridges the signal destined to A from other nodes on the
ring, &oth on wor%ing and protecting routes. At node A, signals from these two routes are continuousl$ monitored for path la$er
defects and the &etter 3ualit$ signal is selected.
*ow consider a failure state where fi&er &etween node A and node 6 is cut. The selector switches traffic on the stand&$ route when
the active route &etween node A and node 6 is failed.
In order to prevent an$ unnecessar$ or spurious protection switching in the presence of &it errors on &oth paths, a switch will
t$picall$ occur when the 3ualit$ of the alternate path exceeds that of the current wor%ing path &$ some threshold (e.g., an order of
magnitude &etter 678). 1onsecutivel$, an$ case of failure drops in S*1P9s decision mechanism.

You might also like