HOSR Problem Snap Shot: Jabodetabek HO Attmp Distribution
1. The document analyzes handover success rates (HOSR) across different regions in a mobile network. HOSR is lowest for handovers due to uplink quality and highest for handovers to better cells.
2. It describes the key steps in the handover process, including measurement collection, reporting, preprocessing, threshold comparison, and target cell selection.
3. Several parameters and timers influence handover signaling and execution, and their settings impact whether handovers are fast and reliable or cause unnecessary attempts.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views20 pages
HOSR Problem Snap Shot: Jabodetabek HO Attmp Distribution
1. The document analyzes handover success rates (HOSR) across different regions in a mobile network. HOSR is lowest for handovers due to uplink quality and highest for handovers to better cells.
2. It describes the key steps in the handover process, including measurement collection, reporting, preprocessing, threshold comparison, and target cell selection.
3. Several parameters and timers influence handover signaling and execution, and their settings impact whether handovers are fast and reliable or cause unnecessary attempts.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20
HOSR Problem Snap Shot
1 week average measurements (W16)
HOSR HO Fail HOSR_UQHOSR_DQ HOSR_UL HOSR_DL HOSR_dist HOSR_BC HOSR_DR Jabodetabek 87.01% 94206 65.66% 80.14% 81.65% 83.54% 0.00% 95.34% 90.95% West Java 79.53% 45250 64.68% 75.38% 76.00% 76.73% 32.50% 91.86% 94.56% Central Java 82.47% 48664 63.65% 79.14% 79.63% 79.86% 60.78% 90.89% 83.42% East Java 82.83% 49904 67.08% 79.98% 79.24% 78.64% 60.00% 92.88% 76.00% HOSR start from BWHCI Cluster 1.21% 4.84% 40.45% 17.77% 0.0001% 35.69% 0.04% Jabodetabek HO Attmp Distribution % HO_Attmp_UQ % HO_Attmp_DQ % HO_Attmp_UL % HO_Attmp_DL % HO_Attmp_dist % HO_Attmp_BC % HO_Attmp_DR 1.92% 3.65% 53.21% 15.97% 0.0022% 25.20% 0.05% West Java HO Attmp Distribution % HO_Attmp_UQ % HO_Attmp_DQ % HO_Attmp_UL % HO_Attmp_DL % HO_Attmp_dist % HO_Attmp_BC % HO_Attmp_DR 2.43% 2.17% 43.15% 21.73% 0.0019% 30.45% 0.07% Central Java HO Attmp Distribution 65.66% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% HOSR_UQ 64.68% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% HOSR_UQ 63.65% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% Uplink Level, Better Cell , and Downlink Level become the most highest reasons for handover attempts in Hutch network. For has the highest success rate performance, while handover due to uplink quality has the lowest success rate. HOSR for uplink and downlink level are also not quite good. Bad HOSR performance in Hutch network 0.0019% % HO_Attmp_UQ % HO_Attmp_DQ % HO_Attmp_UL % HO_Attmp_DL % HO_Attmp_dist % HO_Attmp_BC % HO_Attmp_DR 1.68% 2.65% 47.70% 18.06% 0.0003% 29.77% 0.14% East Java HO Attmp Distribution % HO_Attmp_UQ % HO_Attmp_DQ % HO_Attmp_UL % HO_Attmp_DL % HO_Attmp_dist % HO_Attmp_BC % HO_Attmp_DR 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% HOSR_UQ 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% HOSR_UQ % HO_Attmp_UQ % HO_Attmp_DQ % HO_Attmp_UL % HO_Attmp_DL % HO_Attmp_dist % HO_Attmp_BC % HO_Attmp_DR 1.21% 4.84% 40.45% 17.77% 0.0001% 35.69% 0.04% 1.92% 3.65% 53.21% 15.97% 0.0022% 25.20% 0.05% 2.43% 2.17% 43.15% 21.73% 0.0019% 30.45% 0.07% 1.68% 2.65% 47.70% 18.06% 0.0003% 29.77% 0.14% HOSR start from BWHCI 65.66% 80.14% 81.65% 83.54% 0.00% 95.34% 90.95% HOSR_UQ HOSR_DQ HOSR_UL HOSR_DL HOSR_dist HOSR_BC HOSR_DR Jabodetabek HOSR Distribution 64.68% 75.38% 76.00% 76.73% 32.50% 91.86% 94.56% HOSR_UQ HOSR_DQ HOSR_UL HOSR_DL HOSR_dist HOSR_BC HOSR_DR West Java HOSR Distribution 63.65% 79.14% 79.63% 79.86% 60.78% 90.89% 83.42% Central Java HOSR Distribution in Hutch network. For Success Rate Distribution, handover due to better cell has the lowest success rate. HOSR for uplink and downlink level are also not quite good. HOSR_UQ HOSR_DQ HOSR_UL HOSR_DL HOSR_dist HOSR_BC HOSR_DR 67.08% 79.98% 79.24% 78.64% 60.00% 92.88% 76.00% HOSR_UQ HOSR_DQ HOSR_UL HOSR_DL HOSR_dist HOSR_BC HOSR_DR East Java HOSR Distribution Handover Process What may cause HO Fail ? HOSR = SINTHINT [al] ATINHIRC [all] 1. Target suffer TCH blocking ; no TCH available in target cell 2. Loss of HO ACCESS message until T3124 expiry ; loss may be caused by radio interface problems 3. Loss of HO CMD message until T8 expiry ; loss may be caused by radio interface problems or unnecessary T8 & TTRAU setting. Rule : T8 < TTRAU 4. No SABM after PHYS INFO message transmission until T3105 expiry for NY1+1 times ; loss of message may be caused by radio interface problems or unnecessary T3105 and NY1 setting. Rule : (NY1+1) * T3105]<<T8<TTRAU What may cause HO Fail ? HOSR = SINTHINT [al] ATINHIRC [all] 1. Target suffer TCH blocking ; no TCH available in target cell 2. Loss of HO ACCESS message until T3124 expiry ; loss may be caused by radio interface problems 3. Loss of HO CMD message until T8 expiry ; loss may be caused by radio interface problems or unnecessary T8 & TTRAU setting. What steps are occurred within Handover process ? Step 1 : Measurement values for HO Values which are measured and calculated within each SACCH multiframe (480ms) : Step 2 : Measurement reporting & Neighbour Cell Book Keeping Step 3 : Measurement Pre-Processing Step 1 Measurements : DL/UL lev DL/UL qual TA Traffic load Step 2 Measurement reporting & Neighbour Cell Book Keeping Step 3 Measurement Pre-Processing Step 6 Target Cell List Evaluation Intra BSC Inter BSC Step 7 Selection of New Channel Step 8 Handover Execution - Rx Qual UL&DL - Rx Lev UL&DL - Rx Lev_NCELL (n) - MS_BS_DIST - BCCH_FREQ_NCELL - MS need BCCH_ARFCN_NCELL(n) - The MS reports to the BTS the level measured on a certain ARFCN(n) together with the relative BCCH_FREQ_NCELL_(n) - The MS decodes the Base Station Identity Code BSIC(n) - BCCH_FREQ_NCELL(n) and BSIC(n) CI_NCELL(n)uniquely - Measurements report by MS reporting of the strongest cells with known and allowed BSIC maximum: 6 cells on each SACCH multiframe - The measured (and reported) data per SACCH multiframe are preprocessed within the BTSE using a gliding average window - The size of the window can be set separately for RXQUAL, RXLEV, DIST and PBGT. The measured RXLEV_FULL/SUB or RXQUAL_FULL/SUB gliding window with a multiplicity (weight) given by the parameter W_LEV_HO or W_QUAL_HO, respectively
- Parameter related for measurement pre-processing : HOAVQUAL, HOAVELEV, HOAVDIST, HOAVPWRB - The adjustment of the averaging window size mainly depends on the change of the radio propagation conditions - The setting of the averaging window size has to be a compromise between a fast decision and a reliable decision. - Therefore it is recommended to use a larger window size for the optional handover (better cell) to do not cause a lot of unnecessary handovers and a smaller window size for the mandatory handover causes (quality, level, distance) to be able to react quickly on a sudden decrease of link quality
Step 4 : Threshold Comparison & Network Detection Step 5 : Target Cell Lists Generation Step 6 : Target Cell Lists Evaluation - Parameter related for HO decision : HOLTHQUDL/UL, HOLTHLVDL/UL, HOTMSRM (for DIST HO), HOTDLINT / HOTULINT (for INTRACELL HO) mandatory HO), HOM (for BC HO) - When in condition more than one HO causes are fulfilled, therefore HO will be performed with rank of evaluation : 1. Quality Intercell HO, 2. Level HO, 3. Distance HO, 4. BC HO, 5. Quality Intracell HO, 6. Traffic HO, 7. Forced HO - Generally, HO causes can be classified into 2 categories : 1. radio criteria (imperative) : quality, level, distance, BC ; and 2. network criteria : congestion - In specific cases, (power budget) back HO should be avoided : 1. If an imperative handover occurs, then a back handover should be avoided if the reason for this second handover is the power budget Relative parameter : NOBAKHO, TINHBAKHO 2. In case of a forced handover (e.g. after a directed retry), a back handover should be avoided only if the reason for this second handover is the power budget Relative parameter : NOBAKHO, TIMERFHO - After consecutive handover failures further handovers towards the same cell should be avoided. For this reason the BSC informs the BTS after a number of subsequent HO failures to exclude the cell from the target cell list. Relative parameter : NOFREPHO, TINHFAIHO, MAXFAILHO Rule should be regarded : TINHFAIHO (BTS timer) > THORQST (BTS timer) > T7 (BSC timer) - In a situation, where for a connection in an interfered cell consecutive intracell handovers are performed without improving the quality of the connection (especially if frequency hopping is active), further intracell handovers should be limited. Relative parameter : ELIMITCH, TINOIERCHO, MAIRACHO Rule should be regarded : TINOIERCHO (BTS timer) > THORQST (BTS timer) > T7 (BSC timer) - The maximum number of cells to be included in the target cell list is given by the parameter N_CELL (Parameter NCELL in object HAND, Range: 0 ... 15) - Neighbor cells which are included in the target cell list have to fulfill the following conditions : 1. for quality, level, and distance intercell HO (minimum condition) : RXLEV_NCELL(n) > RXLEV_MIN(n) + MAX(0, MS_TXPWR_MAX(n) - P) 2. for power budget HO : RXLEV_NCELL(n) > RXLEV_MIN(n) + MAX(0, MS_TXPWR_MAX(n) - P) & PBGT(n) - HO_MARGIN(n) > 0 - The ranking of the target cells in the target cell list is performed on the basis of the power budget minus handover margin value ("better cell value") : PRIO_NCELL(n) = PBGT(n) - HO_MARGIN(n)
- Intra BSC HO If the first cell within the target cell list is within its BSS area, the BSC selects a channel at the corresponding BTS. If no channel is available at that BTS, the next cell within the target cell is tried - Inter BSC HO If the first target cell (or the ones tried in further steps) does not belong to the own BSS area, a Handover Required message is sent to the MSC. This message contains a reduced target cell list (without the cells tried internally). Handover Signalling and Timer ? Parameter & Timer for HO Signalling Object DB Name Unit BTS T3105 MS10=10 ms BTS T3124 HAND THORQST 2*SACCH multiframe BSC T7 HLFSEC = 0.5 sec MS100 = 100 msec SEC5 = 5 sec BSC T8 HLFSEC = 0.5 sec SEC5 = 5 sec BTS NY1 - Directed Retry HO ? SDCCH to SDCCH HO ? - Directed retry is the transition (handover) from a SDCCH in one cell to a TCH in another cell during call setup because of unavailability of an empty TCH within the first cell - Relative Parameter : ENFORCHO (Object : BSC; to enable/disable the sending of Forced HO Request messages for running SDCCH co - SDCCH-SDCCH HO provides the handover between two SDCCH channels due to radio conditions. If a MS is using a SDCCH, the BTS che TCH allocation. If the measurements indicate that a SDCCH HO is required, an Intercell/Intracell HO Condition Indication message ( incl. a target cell list ) is sent from BTS to BSC - SDCCH-SDCCH handover is only triggered by the handover causes classified as radio criteria: 1. Quality Intercell 2. Quality Intracell 3. Level Intercell 4. Distance Intercell 5. Power Budget Intercell - Flowchart SDCCH to SDCCH HO :
Rule : (NY1+1)* T3105 << T8 < TTRAU Traffic HO ? Fast Uplink HO ? Level HO Margin ?
- Relative Parameter : IERCHOSDCCH (Object HAND ; Intra-BSC intercell SDCCH-to-SDCCH handover), IRACHOSDCCH (Object HAND ; Intra SDCCH HO), EISDCCHHO (Object BSC ; Inter-BSC SDCCH HO) - Traffic HO allows to move a connection for traffic reasons from one cell to an adjacent cell, even in case that a HO due to radio conditions is not required - Traffic HO increase network capacity - Traffic HO procedures : 1. The BSC starts a timer (TRFCT) 2. When this timer (TRFCT) expires, if the feature is enabled in the cell the BSC calculates the traffic level (in percentage) 3. The cell traffic level value is compared with the predefined percentage of high traffic level threshold (TRFHITH) 4. If the calculated value is higher or equal to TRFHITH parameter the cell is regarded as a high traffic level cell, otherwise the cell is regarded as a low traffic level cell 5. If the cell is classified as a high traffic level cell, the BSC sends a message to the BTS to enable the handover for traffic reason 6. If the cell is classified as a low traffic level cell, the BSC sends a message to the BTS to disable the handover for traffic reason 7. The neighboring cells included in the candidate list are ranked. When the candidate list is ready, the BTS sends to the BSC an inter cell handover condition message that includes the preferred list of candidates and the cause traffic for the handover request 8. When the BSC receives the request, the list is analyzed and the cells with traffic higher than TRAFFICIN are discarded 9. In the target cell a back handover for traffic reasons and power budget is inhibited for the TPENTR duration time - Relative Parameter : BHOFOT, TRFHOM, TRFHOE, TRFHITH, TRFLTH, TRFMS, TRFMMA
- Fast Uplink Handover is used as high-speed handover to prevent from rapid uplink level loss and is applied to save connections in special places with drop call problems - When the power level of a mobile decreases rapidly, a handover can be performed to a predefined cell ( cell that have attribute fastULHoCell set to TRUE) to save the connection - The Fast Uplink Handover is performed after power control has reached its max allowed values - The handover detection is performed for the uplink path and is based on a comparison of the uplink measurement receive level with a threshold, this HO is detected when the uplink measurement receive level is lower than this threshold - As candidate for target cell lists, minimum condition applied for neighbor cells are : RXLEV_NCELL(n) > RXLEVMIN(n) + max(0; Pa) + FULRXLVMOFF
- "Level Handover Margin" Parameter provides a new target cell criteria that takes the different requirements for level handover and quality handover into consideration - The creation of the target cell list is based on these criteria : RXLEV_NCELL(n) > RXLEV_MIN(n) + max (0,MS_TXPWR_MAX-P) AND PBGT(n) > LEVHOM(n) - Relative parameter : ELEVHOM (Object HAND , flag to enable/disable Level HO Margin), LEVHOM (Object ADJC)
Step 4 Threshold Comparison & Network Detection Step 5 Target Cell List Generation Target Cell List Evaluation me The size of the window can be set separately for RXQUAL, RXLEV, DIST and PBGT. The measured RXLEV_FULL/SUB or RXQUAL_FULL/SUB values are put into the essary handovers and a smaller window size for the Parameter related for HO decision : HOLTHQUDL/UL, HOLTHLVDL/UL, HOTMSRM (for DIST HO), HOTDLINT / HOTULINT (for INTRACELL HO), RXLEVMIN (for BC HO, and target cell lists for ntercell HO, 2. Level HO, 3. Distance HO, 4. BC HO, 5. Quality Intracell 2. network criteria : congestion the power budget r this second handover is the power budget the BTS after a number of subsequent HO failures to exclude he quality of the connection (especially if frequency hopping is active), HAND, Range: 0 ... 15) lue ("better cell value") : If the first cell within the target cell list is within its BSS area, the BSC selects a channel at the corresponding BTS. If no channel is available at that BTS, the next cell within the target cell is tried If the first target cell (or the ones tried in further steps) does not belong to the own BSS area, a Handover Required message is sent to the MSC. This message contains a reduced target cell list (without the cells tried internally). Remarks period for repetition of PHYSICAL INFORMATION Start: sending of PHYSICAL INFORMATION by BTS Stop: reception of correctly decoded signaling or TCH frame on new channel from MS at BTS Expiry: repetition of PHYSICAL INFORMATION until NY1+1 times Not adjustable by DB parameter min. time for HO COND. IND. messages for the same connection Start: sending of HANDOVER CONDITION INDICATION by BTS Stop: HANDOVER COMMAND received , lost communication with MS, call cleared Expiry: repetition of HANDOVER CONDITION INDICATION Waiting time for a HANDOVER COMMAND from the MSC Start: sending of HANDOVER REQUIRED by BSC Stop: HANDOVER COMMAND received, lost communication with MS, call cleared determines the time to receive the HANDOVER COMPLETE message purpose: keep the old channels available for a sufficient time in order to allow the MS to return to the old channel return to it if the handover is not successful and to release the old channel if the MS is lost. start: transmission of a HANDOVER COMMAND from the BSC to the MS stop: a) intra-BSC handover: receipt of a HANDOVER COMPLETE or a HANDOVER FAILURE from the MS b) inter-BSC handover: receipt of a CLEAR COMMAND from the MSC or HANDOVER FAILURE from the MS maximum number of repetitions of the physical information by the BTS vailability of an empty TCH within the first cell Relative Parameter : ENFORCHO (Object : BSC; to enable/disable the sending of Forced HO Request messages for running SDCCH connections; to enable/disable DR HO) SDCCH HO provides the handover between two SDCCH channels due to radio conditions. If a MS is using a SDCCH, the BTS checks the radio conditions as in the case of ge ( incl. a target cell list ) is sent from BTS to BSC SDCCH handover), IRACHOSDCCH (Object HAND ; Intracell HO due to quality for SDCCH to dio conditions is not required herwise the cell is regarded as a low traffic level cell
he BSC an inter cell handover condition message that in special places with drop call problems e fastULHoCell set to TRUE) to save the connection ith a threshold, this HO is detected when the uplink and quality handover into consideration Jabodetabek Cluster => proposed for setting trial Current Audit Proposed HOAVQUAL HAND 6-2 6-2 HOAVELEV HAND 8-2 6-2 HOAVDIST HAND 8 8 HOAVPWRB HAND 8 8 HOLTHQUDL HAND 5 5 HOLTHQUUL HAND 5 5 HOLTHLVDL HAND 12 10 HOLTHLVUL HAND 6 6 HOTMSRM HAND 34 ; 35 35 HOTDLINT HAND 35 35 HOTULINT HAND 31 ; 35 31 RXLEVMIN ADJC 12 14 HOM ADJC 67 67 NOBAKHO HAND TRUE TRUE TINHBAKHO ADJC 30 30 TIMERFHO ADJC 12 12 NOFREPHO HAND TRUE TRUE TINHFAIHO ADJC 5 8 MAXFAILHO HAND 2 2 THORQST HAND 8 8 T7 BSC HLFSEC-7 HLFSEC-7 ELIMITCH HAND TRUE TRUE TINOIERCHO HAND 10 ; 60 10 MAIRACHO HAND 2 ; 4 4 NCELL HAND 6 ; 8 6 T3105 BTS MS10-10 MS10-10 T8 BSC HLFSEC-12 HLFSEC-14 NY1 BTS 50 50 ENFORCHO BSC ENABLED ENABLED IERCHOSDCCHHAND TRUE ; FALSETRUE IRACHOSDCCHHAND FALSE FALSE EISDCCHHO BSC DISABLED DISABLED ELEVHOM HAND FALSE TRUE LEVHOM ADJC 67 ; 69 67 Value DB Parameter Object Smaller window size for mandatory HO to be able to react quickly on sudden decrease of link quality => advantage : prevent TCH drop & loss connection Increase RXLEVMIN for guarantee target cell lists have good Rx Level; also must follow rule : RXLEVMIN > HOLTHLVDL to prevent ping-pong HO Must follow the rule : TINHFAIHO > THORQST(HAND) > T7 (SET BSC [TIMER]) Give more opportunities to the cell to perform certain number of consecutive successful intracell handovers due to quality that are permitted in the same BTS for a single connection => advantages : keep good quality within single connection Give sufficient time for BTS to receive HANDOVER COMPLETE message ; give more time for BTS to keep the old channels available for a sufficient time in order to allow the MS to return to the old channel return to it if the handover is not successful and to release the old channel if the MS is lost This setting provide new target cell criteria for HO due to level, that is PBGT(n) > LEVHOM(n). This criteria / margin will more guarantee target in better level & quality condition, which will increase successful probability for HO performing. When we detect most HO attempts due to level are occured in network, then we should activate this feature. Must follow the rule : TINHFAIHO > THORQST(HAND) > T7 (SET BSC [TIMER]) Give more opportunities to the cell to perform certain number of consecutive successful intracell handovers due to quality that are permitted in the same BTS for a single Give sufficient time for BTS to receive HANDOVER COMPLETE message ; give more time for BTS to keep the old channels available for a sufficient time in order to allow the MS to return to the old channel return to it if the handover is not successful This setting provide new target cell criteria for HO due to level, that is PBGT(n) > LEVHOM(n). This criteria / margin will more guarantee target in better level & quality condition, which will increase successful probability for HO performing. When we detect most HO attempts due to level are occured in network, then we should activate this feature.