Particle Chains and Clusters On Non-Bravais Lattices
Particle Chains and Clusters On Non-Bravais Lattices
Particle Chains and Clusters On Non-Bravais Lattices
School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv 69978 Israel
(Dated: September 2011)
We study optical guiding and dispersion in chains of linear particle clusters. A formulation
governing the electrodynamics of chains on interlaced and non-Bravais lattices is developed, and
used to study clustered chains. It is shown that non-Bravais and clustered chains may oer new
degrees of freedom for dispersion synthesis and engineering, controlling parameters such as frequency
and group and phase velocities.
PACS numbers: 78.67.Bf,42.82.Et,71.45.Gm,41.20.Jb,42.25.Bs
Keywords: plasmonic waveguide, particle chains, particle arrays, particle clusters
I. INTRODUCTION
The electromagnetic properties of linear
chains of identical and equally spaced micro-
particles have been studied in a number of
previous publications [1]-[7]. If the inter-
particle distance d is much smaller than the
free space wavelength , these structures can
support the propagation of guided electromag-
netic modes along the chain that do not radi-
ate into the free space, with total width that
can be much smaller than . Hence the name
Sub-Diraction Chains (SDC). If the parti-
cles are identical isotropic spheres, three inde-
pendent electric dipole modes are supported;
one with longitudinal e-dipole polarization p
z
,
and two degenerate modes with transverse and
mutually orthogonal polarizations p
x
, p
y
[7]. In
the former the group and phase velocities v
g
, v
p
are of the same sign, while in the latter v
g
and
v
p
are of opposite signs. It has been shown
that if the chain particles are non-spherical
(e.g. ellipsoids) more elaborate mode-structures
may exist [8]-[10]. Generally, the interest in
SDCs is motivated by both theoretical and
practical points of view. Particle chains were
proposed as guiding structures and junctions
[1]-[7], as mechanism for coupling to surface
waves [8], as polarization sensitive waveguides
[9], and for one-way optical guiding [10]. Re-
cently, it has been shown that SDCs can sup-
port second harmonic generation and gain, with
a proper design of their dispersion character-
istics. The exibility in designing the chain
dispersion, however, is quite limited and it has
been achieved only via a microscopic design of
the particles shape [11]. Clearly these potential
=1
nm
A(R
n
nm
)p
n
m
(1)
where
nm
means that the summation over
n
nm
= |(mm
)D + (n n
sites. The 33
matrix A(z) is the free space electric eld radi-
ation from innitesimal electric dipole,
A(z) =
e
ik|z|
4 |z|
_
k
2
A
1
+
_
1
z
2
ik
|z|
_
A
2
_
(2)
here A
1
= diag(1, 1, 0), A
2
= diag(1, 1, 2).
Clearly, Eq. (1) is shift invariant with m. Since
the structure period is D, we assume a solution
of the form
p
nm
= p
n0
e
imD
, n = 1, . . . , N. (3)
Substituting Eq. (3) in Eq. (1) and rearranging,
we obtain the 3M3M matrix equation (rows
n and columns n
=1
n
S
n
n
p
n
0
= 0, (4)
n = 1, . . . , N,
where
n
= 6
0
k
3
n
is the normalized (di-
mensionless) polarizability. Again,
n
indi-
cates that the summation excludes the n
= n
term. Since n
, = 0 only. Gen-
erally, S
m=0
A(mD)e
imD
(5)
S
=
6
k
3
m
A(mD + d)e
imD
(6)
1 || N 1.
The dispersion relation () is obtained by
looking for values of for which the determi-
nant of Eq. (4) vanishes. The corresponding
vectors are the dipole moments of the M parti-
cles in the reference 0-th cluster. Note that the
3 3 matrix S
0
is identical to the one obtained
in conventional B-chains with inter-particle dis-
tance D. It can be expressed analytically using
the Polylogarithm functions [7]. Specically
S
0
=
3
2
_
f
1
(kD, D)
kD
A
1
if
2
(kD, D)
(kD)
2
A
2
+
f
3
(kD, D)
(kD)
3
A
2
_
(7)
where
f
s
(x, y) = Li
s
[e
i(x+y)
] + Li
s
[e
i(xy)
] (8)
and where Li
s
(z) is the s-th order Polyloga-
rithm function, dened by
Li
s
(z) =
n=1
z
n
n
s
, Li
s
(z) = z
1
Li
s1
(z),
(9)
with Li
0
(z) = z/(1 z), Li
1
(z) = ln(1 z).
See [13] for discussions of Li
s
(z) analytic prop-
erties, and [7, 14] for their use in particle B-
chains. The series in Eq. (9) is strictly conver-
gent only for |z| 1, and due to the algebraic
behavior convergence is slow. However, in the
present work we look for values of Li
s
(z) only
on the unit circle in the complex z plan (i.e.
z = e
i
). Fast converging formulas for the eval-
uation of Li
s
in this domain are readily avail-
able - see appendix for details.
The matrices S
, = 0 ex-
cludes the n
, = 0 analytically by a nite
weighted sum of Li
s
that can be computed ef-
ciently. Towards this end, we re-write Eq. (6)
as
S
= h
1
[]A
1
ih
2
[]A
2
+ h
3
[]A
2
(10)
where (recall that D = Nd)
h
s
[] =
3
2
1
(kd)
s
m
e
ikd|mN+|+idmN
|mN + |
s
. (11)
4
1. Evaluation of hs[]
For 1 N 1, h
s
[] can be re-written as
h
s
[] =
3
2
e
id
(kd)
s
m=0
_
e
i(k+)d
mN+
(mN + )
s
+
+
3
2
e
id
(kd)
s
m=1
_
e
i(k)d
mN
(mN )
s
. (12)
We concentrate on the rst sum above. It has
the form
=
m=0
(e
ix
)
mN+
(mN + )
s
. (13)
This sum can be re-written as
=
n=1
(e
ix
)
n
n
s
a
n
() (14)
where a
n
() is an auxiliary periodic sequence of
period N, satisfying
a
n
() =
_
0, n = 1, . . . , N, n =
1, n =
. (15)
Clearly, the series periodicity implies the recur-
rence relation a
n+N
= a
n
, whose characteristic
polynomial p() =
N
1 has N distinct roots
N
1 = 0 {
r
}
N1
r=0
= e
i2r/N
, (16)
hence the innite sequence a
n
(), n can be
generated by the nite sum
a
n
() =
N1
r=0
C
r
()
n
r
=
N1
r=0
C
r
()e
i2rn/N
.
(17)
The coecients C
r
() can be determined us-
ing the N-initial conditions of the recurrence
relation [given by Eq. (15)] in Eq. (17). The
result is the N N Vandermonde matrix equa-
tion a() = C(). Here a() is a vector of N
entries, whose elements are given by Eq. (15),
C() is the vector of unknown coecients, and
is a Vandermonde matrix, whose n, r entry
is
nr
= e
i2rn/N
. Due to its specic structure,
is also a unitary transformation from the Eu-
clidean basis a
n
() (roam with ) to a Fourier
basis. Its inverse is its adjoint (normalize rst).
Hence
C
r
() = N
1
e
i2r/N
a
n
() =
1
N
N1
r=0
e
i2r(n)/N
, n. (18)
Substituting this result into Eq. (14) and ex-
changing the order of summation, we can ex-
press as a nite sum of Polylogarithms
= N
1
N1
r=0
e
i2r/N
Li
s
(e
ix+i2r/N
). (19)
Likewise, we may repeat essentially the same
procedure for the second sum in Eq. (12) (note
the lower summation bound; shift the index by
1, and at the end change r Nr
). The nal
result for h
s
[], 1 N 1, is
h
s
[] =
3
2N
e
id
(kd)
s
(20)
N1
r=0
e
i2r/N
f
s
(kd, d + 2r/N)
where f
s
(x, y) is dened in Eq. (8). Repeating
the same procedure for h
s
[] with 1
N 1, we obtain again a summation over N
terms,
h
s
[] =
3
2N
e
id
(kd)
s
(21)
N1
r=0
e
i2r/N
f
s
(kd, d + 2r/N).
With these nite expansions for h
s
, we use
Eq. (10) to evaluate the matrices S
, 1 ||
N 1 for the NB-chain formulation [Eq. (4)].
Finally, note that if a cluster consists of M
particles (recall that M N), the matrix size
in Eq. (4) is actually 3M3M. If
n
is diago-
nal for all particles, this can be reduced to three
independent sets of M M each. This gener-
ally yields M dispersion curves for each polar-
ization. It should be emphasized, however, that
the S
0
= p
10
e
i
(22)
with n
= 11 (n
= 2).
The results for the transverse polarization are
shown in Fig. 3. Only the domain 0 D
is presented since the dispersions are even with
. The following observations can be made.
0 0.5 1
0.575
0.576
0.577
0.578
0.579
p
D /
1 0 1
0.575
0.576
0.577
0.578
0.579
/
0 0.5 1
0.575
0.576
0.577
0.578
0.579
p
D /
1 0 1
0.575
0.576
0.577
0.578
0.579
/
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
"inphase"
"antiphased"
FIG. 3. Mode solutions for two dierent ratios
d1/D in a 2-particle clustered chain, for transverse
polarizations. (a) dispersion curves for D = 2.1d1.
(b) The inter-cluster phase dierence dened in
Eq. (22). (c) and (d) are the same as (a) and (b)
but for D = 3d1.
For each chain, the number of independent
transverse modes (or dispersion curves) is 2 -
identical to the number of particles in a clus-
ter. The upper dispersion curve (shown in red)
has essentially the same characteristics of the
transverse modes in conventional B-chains (see,
e.g. [7]). It possesses opposite group and phase
velocities. It also possesses a light-line branch
only a section of which is shown in red dotted
linethat runs close to the light-line cone, sat-
isfying c. This light-line branch repre-
sents a modal solution whose electromagnetic
elds weakly interact with the chain, and are
nearly plane-waves. In this mode the dipoles
within a cluster are excited in phase as ev-
ident from the fact that for the entire upper
(red) dispersion curve we have . In
contrast, the lower dispersion curve (blue) pos-
sesses quite dierent characteristics. Its phase
and group velocities are parallel, and it pos-
sesses no light-line branch. In this mode the
dipoles within a cluster are excited essentially
in opposite phases, as for the entire
curve. This fact explains the absence of light-
line branch in the blue curves; this dipole dis-
tribution cannot couple at all to a free-space
plane wave. In fact, for strongly clustered
chains (d
1
D) this mode approaches the case
of quadrupole-particles chain with inter-particle
distance D.
Solving the same chain geometry for longi-
tudinal polarizations we obtain the dispersion
curves in Fig. 4. Again, we have two indepen-
dent modes, the same as the number of cluster
particles. The lower (red) curve is essentially
the same as the dispersion curve of conventional
B-chain in longitudinal polarization, and the
cluster dipoles are excited mainly in-phase.
The upper (blue) curve shows that clustering
enables us to get v
g
v
p
< 0 which cannot be
achieved in this polarization with conventional
B-chains. Here the cluster dipoles are excited
in opposite phases. Both curves do not possess
light-line branches.
0 0.5 1
0.572
0.574
0.576
0.578
0.58
p
D /
1 0 1
0.572
0.574
0.576
0.578
0.58
/
0 0.5 1
0.572
0.574
0.576
0.578
0.58
p
D /
1 0 1
0.572
0.574
0.576
0.578
0.58
/
(b) (a)
(c)
(d)
FIG. 4. The same as Fig. 3 but for the longitudinal
polarization.
The dispersion curves in Figs. 3-4 indicate
that clustering can be used to reduce the op-
6
tical modes group velocity v
g
, while keeping
constant the same number of particles per unit
distance (clearly, one can always reduce v
g
by
increasing the distance between the particles,
but this also increases the light-line gap and
loss). In Fig. 5 we show v
g
for chains with two
particles clusters and period D = d
1
. It is
seen that v
g
decreases as increases (tighter
clustering), and the eect is more profound for
the anti-phase modes.
0.5772 0.5774 0.5776 0.5778 0.578 0.5782 0.5784 0.5786 0.5788 0.579
6
4
2
0
x 10
4
In phase modes
/
p
V
g
/
(
D
p
)
0.5756 0.5758 0.576 0.5762 0.5764 0.5766 0.5768 0.577 0.5772 0.5774
0
2
4
6
x 10
4
Anti phase modes
/
p
V
g
/
(
D
p
)
=4
=3
=2.25
=2
(b)
(a)
FIG. 5. Transverse polarization modes group ve-
locity in chains of two particles clusters. The case
of = 2 corresponds to a conventional chain of pe-
riod D/2. (a) the in-phase mode (b) the anti-phase
mode
We turn to examine larger clusters, consist-
ing of M equally-spaced particles, with D =
d
1
where d
1
is the inter-particle spacing within
a cluster. If = M the structure is nothing
but a regular B-chain with inter-particle dis-
tance d
1
. For > M the gap opened between
two adjacent clusters is larger than d
1
, hence
each cluster indeed looks like a set of M iso-
lated particles. For M1 < < M, this gap is
smaller than d
1
and the structure can be viewed
as a chain of two-particles cluster with period
D, interlaced with another periodic chain. We
examine these cases for M = 5. Figures 6-
7 show the dispersion curves for the cases of
= 4.75 and = 5.25, respectively. The dis-
persion curves for the transverse polarization
are shown in Figs. 6a and 7a, with insets in the
top of these gures schematizing the respective
chain structures. The corresponding phase dis-
tributions within cluster are shown in Figs. 6b
and 7b. Note that the only dispersion curve
for which all the particles in a cluster possess
the same phase, is the upper one in each case
(this occurs at the curves upper edge). Accord-
ingly, we have observed that this curve is the
only one that possesses light-line branch (not
shown). Also note that the dispersion curves
for < M span over a larger range of frequen-
cies, when compared to > M, and also have
lower group velocities.
0 0.5 1
0.568
0.57
0.572
0.574
0.576
0.578
0.58
0.582
0.584
0.586
D /
p
1 0.5 0 0.5 1
/
p
2
/p
1
p
3
/p
1
p
4
/p
1
p
5
/p
1
M=5, =4.75
(a) (b)
FIG. 6. Transverse polarization dispersion curves
(a) and the corresponding phase distributions (b)
for a chain with 5-particles cluster, and = 4.75.
The upper curve is the only one that possesses light-
line branch (not shown)
0 0.5 1
0.568
0.57
0.572
0.574
0.576
0.578
0.58
0.582
0.584
0.586
D /
p
1 0.5 0 0.5 1
/
p
2
/p
1
p
3
/p
1
p
4
/p
1
p
5
/p
1
M=5, =5.25
(a) (b)
FIG. 7. Transverse polarization dispersion curves
(a) and the corresponding phase distributions (b)
for a chain with 5-particles cluster, and = 5.25.
The upper curve is the only one that possesses light-
line branch (not shown).
IV. CONCLUSIONS
A formulation governing the propagation of
optical modes in general linearly-clustered par-
ticle chains and linear non-Bravais chains has
been developed. The formulation can handle
periodic chains with non-identical particles as
well. It provides the modes dispersion in terms
7
of the roots of the chain determinant, where
the latter is expressed in terms of a nite sum
of Polylogarithm functions. Specic examples
of two-particle clusters and ve-particle clusters
are provided. It is shown that clustered chains
may oer new degrees of freedom in dispersion
engineering, such as control of operating fre-
quency, and the wave velocities. Strong reduc-
tion of group velocity, and also the inversion
of the group velocity for longitudinal as well as
transverse excitations are shown.
Appendix A: Evaluation of Lis(e
i
)
Li
s
(e
ix
) for real x, can be expressed as -
nite sums of Clausen integrals [13],[15]. The
latter can be computed using series that con-
verge much faster than the algebraic conver-
gence of the formal denition in Eq. (9). Note
that Li
1
(z) = ln(1 z). Furthermore, from
Eq. (9) it follows that
Li
s+1
(z) =
_
z
0
t
1
Li
s
(t) dt (A1)
Collecting the Clausen integrals components
that constitute our Li
s
and rearranging, we ob-
tain for s = 2 and |x|
Li
2
(e
ix
) =
2
6
x
4
(2 x) (A2)
i
_
xln x x
1
2
n=1
B
2n
x
2n+1
n(2n + 1)(2n)!
_
where B
2n
are the Bernoulli numbers absolute
value. With terms up to n = 5 in the series
above, the relative error for x = is in the order
of 10
5
. From the integral relation Eq. (A1) we
obtain
Li
3
(e
ix
) = (3) +
x
2
2
(ln x 3/2)
1
4
n=1
B
2n
x
2n+2
n(n + 1)(2n + 1)(2n)!
+ i
_
2
x
6
x
2
4
+
x
3
12
_
(A3)
where (3) 1.2020569. Higher order Polylog-
arithm functions are not needed in the present
work.
[1] M. Quinten, A. Leitner, J. R. Krenn, and
F. R. Aussenegg, Electromagnetic energy
transport via linear chains of silver nanopar-
ticles, Optics Letters, 23(17), 1331 (1998).
[2] S. A. Tretyakon and A. J. Viitanen, Line
of periodically arranged passive dipole scat-
terers, Electrical Engineering, 82, 353-361
(2000).
[3] M. L. Brongersma, J. L. Hartman, and
H. A. Atwater, Electromagnetic energy trans-
fer and switching in nanoparticle chain ar-
rays below the diraction limit, Phys. Rev. B,
62(24) R16356 (2000).
[4] W. H. Weber and G. W. Ford, Propagation
of optical excitations by dipolar interactions in
metal nanoparticle chains, Phys. Rev. B 70,
125429 (2004).
[5] A. F. Koenderink and A. Polman, Complex
response and polariton-like dispersion split-
ting in periodic metal nanoparticle chains,
Phys. Rev. B 74, 033402 (2006).
[6] T. Yang and K. B. Crozier, Dispersion and
extinction of surface plasmons in an array
of gold nanoparticle chains: inuence of the
air/glass interface, Optics Express 16(12),
8570 (2008).
[7] Andrea Alu and Nader Engheta, Theory of
linear chains of metamaterial/plasmonic parti-
cles as subdiraction optical nanotransmission
lines, Phys. Rev. B 74, 205436 (2006).
[8] D. V. Orden, Y. Fainman, and V. Lomakin,
Optical waves on nanoparticle chains coupled
with surfaces, Optics Letters, 34(4), 422-424
(2009).
[9] D. V. Orden, Y. Fainman, and V. Lomakin,
Twisted chains of resonant particles: opti-
cal polarization control, waveguidance, and
radiation, Optics Letters, 35(15), 2579-2581
(2010).
[10] Y. Hadad and Ben Z. Steinberg, Magne-
tized spiral chains of plasmonic ellipsoids for
one-way optical waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
105, 233904 (2010).
[11] Ben Z. Steinberg, Parametric plasmonics
and second harmonic generation in particle
chains, Optics Express, 19(27), 25843-25853
(2011).
[12] S. A. Maier, P. G. Kik, and H. A. At-
water, Optical pulse propagation in metal
nanoparticle chain waveguides, Phys. Rev. B,
67,205402 (2003).
[13] Leonard Lewin, Polylogarithms and Associated
Functions, Elsevier , New York, 1981.
[14] Y. Hadad and Ben Z. Steinberg, Greens func-
tion theory for innite and semi-innite parti-
cle chains, Phys. Rev. B 84, 125402 (2011).
[15] I. A. Stegun, Miscellaneous Functions,
Chapt. 27 in Handbook of Mathematical
Functions, edited by I. A. Stegun and
M. Abramowitz (Dover Publications, Inc.,
New York, 1970).