Scribd
Upload
298 views1 page

PBQ201 2014 Assignment 3 Rubric

This rubric evaluates assignments on developing a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan. It provides criteria for grading elements of the HACCP plan, including introducing the context, describing the HACCP team and scope, analyzing hazards and processes, developing the HACCP table, using exemplar forms, and referencing sources. Areas are judged on unsatisfactory, satisfactory, good, or excellent demonstrations of understanding and completeness.

Uploaded by

jdynamic
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
298 views1 page

PBQ201 2014 Assignment 3 Rubric

This rubric evaluates assignments on developing a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan. It provides criteria for grading elements of the HACCP plan, including introducing the context, describing the HACCP team and scope, analyzing hazards and processes, developing the HACCP table, using exemplar forms, and referencing sources. Areas are judged on unsatisfactory, satisfactory, good, or excellent demonstrations of understanding and completeness.

Uploaded by

jdynamic
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Assignment 3 - HACCP Plan Rubric

Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent


Introduction of the
assignment and
context (1 marks)
Introduction and
context poorly
presented.
Introduction and
context is clear and
meaningful.
Introduction and
context is well
articulated and
connects the reader
to the context.
Introduction and
context is well
articulated,
innovative and
enables a strong
connection with the
context.
HACCP Steps 1-
3
(2 marks)
Limited
understanding of
the HACCP team,
scope and purpose
of demonstrated.
A reasonable
understanding of
the HACCP team,
scope and purpose
is presented
A good
understanding of
the HACCP team,
scope and purpose
presented.
A detailed
understanding of
the HACCP team,
scope and purpose
with supporting
background
information is
presented.
HACCP Steps 4-
5
(2 Marks)
A poor presentation
and understanding
of process flows
and all over all
representations of
the operations is
presented
A reasonable
presentation and
understanding of
process flows and
all over all
representations of
the operations is
presented
A good
presentation and
understanding of
process flows,
clearly showing all
relevant steps to
think, with good
overall
representations of
the operations is
presented .
A detailed
presentation and
understanding of
process flows,
clearly showing all
relevant steps to
think, with a
comprehensive l
representations of
the operations is
presented .
HACCP Step 6 -
Hazard Analysis
(5 marks)
The hazard analysis
is incomplete and
is logically floored.
There is evidence of
a competent and
logical hazard
analysis.
There is evidence of
a comprehensive
and logical hazard
analysis.
There is strong
evidence of a
comprehensive
and logical hazard
analysis.
Steps 7-12 -
HACCP Table
(8 marks)
The HACCP Table
is incomplete and
is logically floored.
The HACCP Table
is complete but may
have
inconsistencies in
logic across Critical
Point
determinations,
Validations and
Verifications.
The HACCP Table
is complete but may
have occasional
inconsistencies in
logic.
The HACCP Table
is complete with
robust Critical
Point
determinations,
validation and
verification
activities.
Exemplar Form
(1 marks)
The form is missing
essential fields or
identifiers or
demonstrates
inadequate
document control.
The form has
essential fields,
identifiers and
adequate document
control.
The form has most
major fields,
identifiers and
adequate document
control.
The form has all
major fields,
identifiers and
comprehensive
document control.
Biboliography
and Style (1
marks)
Inconsistent use of
style and
referencing
techniques.
Consistent use of
style and
referencing
techniques.
Consistent and
effective use of
style and
referencing
techniques.

You might also like