Benchbook Self Assessment Manual 1 Protected
Benchbook Self Assessment Manual 1 Protected
Benchbook Self Assessment Manual 1 Protected
Benchbook Self-Assessment
and Accreditation Process
MANUAL I
PHILIPPINE HEALTH INSURANCE CORPORATION
Manual 1
Table of Contents
I. GUIDELINES FOR THE HOSPITALS 2
Appendix A . 8
Appendix B ... 10
Appendix C ... 11
II. BENCHBOOK SELF ASSESSMENT AND SURVEY
TOOLS. 12
Patients Rights.. 12
Patient Care 17
Leadership and Management 44
Human Resource Management . 48
Information Management 55
Safe Practice and Environment . 59
Improving Performance ... 72
III. THE BENCHBOOK ACCREDITATION PROCESS
(Self-Assessment). 75
GUIDELINES FOR THE HOSPITALS
Accomplishing the Benchbook Self-Assessment and Survey Tool
I. COMPONENTS OF THE TOOL
The Benchbook Self-Assessment and Survey Tool is divided into seven performance areas: (1) Patient
Rights and Organizational Ethics, (2) Patient Care, (3) Leadership and Management, (4) Human
Resource Management, (5) Information Management, (6) Safe Practice and Environment, and (7)
Improving Performance. Each performance area is divided into sub-areas, except for Patient Rights and
Improving Performance. These sub-areas are broken down into several standards with one or several
criteria to each standard; one or several indicators to each criterion; and one or several evidence to each
indicator.
The tool contains the list of goals, standards, criteria, indicators and evidence under each performance
area. It is divided into 15 sections representing 3 process areas (document review, chart review and
leadership interview) and 12 hospital areas (wards, ER, OPD, ICU, OR, pharmacy, laboratory, imaging,
medical records, facilities and maintenance, human resources and others).
The indicators are appropriated into the 15 sections of the self-assessment and survey tool. A particular
indicator may be found in one or several sections where the indicator is applicable.
The self-assessment/survey tool has eight columns (see appendix a). The first column, CODE, contains
the unique alphanumeric code for each indicator and tags for the core indicators. The second, third and
fourth columns contain the STANDARDS, CRITERIA and INDICATORS respectively. The standards and
criteria that appear in the self-assessment/survey tool are the same standards and criteria that were
published in the Benchbook on Performance Improvement of Health Services. (De la Pena, 2004)
The next two columns, labeled HOSP and PHIC, contain blank spaces, which shall be used to indicate
compliance or noncompliance to the evidence. The evidences are listed in the 7
th
column. Comments
and explanations may be written in the 8
th
column labeled REMARKS.
II. USERS
Hospital conducting self-assessment
The Benchbook Self-Assessment and Survey Tool will be used by the hospital during its conduct of the
self-assessment process. It allows the hospital to evaluate itself and discern clearly its strengths and
areas in which improvements can be made. For the self-assessment, the hospital has to accomplish the
Self-Assessment and Survey Tool and the score sheet.
PhilHealth Surveyors conducting accreditation survey
The Benchbook Self-Assessment and Survey Tool accomplished by the hospital will be submitted to
PhilHealth and will be used by the surveyors during the conduct of the accreditation survey. The two
columns labeled PHIC and SURVEYOR SCORE are intended for PhilHealth use.
III. PROCEDURE
Hospitals may employ the following procedure for conducting the self-assessment and accomplishing
the score sheet. This process is similar to the accreditation survey process to be conducted by
PhilHealth.
1. REVIEW THE STANDARDS
The hospital may start by reading the following components in the tool in order to understand the
requirements in the proper context:
Goal: declares the overall intent of the standards under it; pictures the desired-for situation
targeted by a performance improvement program
Standard: delineates the best possible condition that should exist in the organization for it to
attain quality performance; sets the maximum achievable performance expectations for activities
that affect the quality of care
Criteria: lays down specific actions that need to be done to meet the standard
Indicators: measurable variables or characteristics that can be used to determine the degree of
adherence to a standard or achievement of quality goals
Page 2 of 76
Core indicators : characteristics that should be present for a hospital to function as a
facility providing care, treatment and diagnosis in a manner that is safe and efficient for
the patients and its staff
Evidence: proof of compliance to the indicator in the form of a document, through interview or
observation
2. ORGANIZE THE SELF-ASSESSMENT TEAM
The hospital should come up with a team tasked to conduct its self-assessment. It may assign only
an individual or hire consultants to do the job depending on its preferred approach or as may be
permitted by its resources.
Hospitals may also adopt a process similar to the PHIC accreditation survey. The survey will be done
by a team of at least three surveyors regardless of the level of care (primary, secondary or tertiary).
One member of the team should have the capability of evaluating charts and understanding the
medical process (surveyor A), preferably a doctor or a nurse. The rest of the team (surveyor B and
C) shall be composed of allied medical professionals or other technical staff. The surveyors will be
assigned different sections of the tool. Each surveyor will handle a different process or hospital area.
The suggested distribution of areas is as follows:
Hospital Areas covered Range of evidences
Surveyor A
(Doctor/Nurse)
Wards (medical, surgical,
pediatric and OB), ER,
ICU
Chart review, Document
review, Leadership
interview
Surveyor B
(Technical Staff)
Imaging, Laboratory,
Facilities and
Maintenance, Other
areas
Document review.
Leadership interview
Surveyor C
(Technical Staff)
HR, Medical records,
OPD, OR, Pharmacy
Document review,
Leadership interview
The PhilHealth survey will take a maximum of 3 days for a tertiary hospital, 2 days for a secondary
hospital and one day for a primary hospital.
Tertiary Hospital
Surveyor A Surveyor B Surveyor C
Opening Conference
Document Review Day 1
Leadership Interview
Chart review Imaging HR
Medical ward Laboratory Medical records
Surgical/OB ward Facilities and
maintenance
Pharmacy Day 2
Pediatric ward OR
ICU Other areas OPD
ER
Surveyor meeting
Day 3
Exit conference
Secondary Hospital
Surveyor A Surveyor B Surveyor C
Opening Conference
Document Review
Leadership Interview
Chart review Imaging HR
Day 1
Medical ward/ICU Laboratory Medical records
Surgical/OB ward Facilities and
maintenance
Pharmacy
Pediatric ward OR
ER Other areas OPD
Surveyor meeting
Day 2
Exit conference
Page 3 of 76
Primary Hospital
Surveyor A Surveyor B Surveyor C
Opening Conference
Document Review
Leadership Interview
Chart review Imaging/Laboratory HR
Ward Facilities and
maintenance
Medical records
ER Other areas Pharmacy
OPD
Surveyor meeting
Exit conference
3. ANALYZE EVIDENCES
The self-assessment team may proceed by analyzing the evidence/s in their assigned hospital areas
and determine compliance to the indicator. As evidences include documents, interview and
observation, the hospital should analyze them in the manner PhilHealth will analyze them during the
actual accreditation survey. With documentary evidences for example, the hospital should perform its
own document review i.e. patient chart review, policy reviews, etc. For interviews and observation,
the hospital may conduct them on patients, their staff, or leaders in order to make an appropriate self-
assessment. It may also employ the data-gathering and sampling techniques used by PHIC
surveyors on particular indicators.
As some indicators need to be assessed in several hospital areas or by several types of evidence,
hospitals should refer to Column 5 of the score sheet labeled AREA which lists all the possible
hospital/process areas where the indicators may be evaluated.
4. ACCOMPLISH THE SCORE SHEET
The self-assessment team is in charge of checking for the evidence in the hospital areas. In the
score sheet, compliance is marked with a check and noncompliance with an x,. Compliance and
non-compliance is inputted in the 5
th
and 6
th
columns (HOSP and PHIC) of the self-
assessment/survey tool. Any additional comments shall be written in the 8
th
column (REMARKS).
Towards the end of the survey, the team will meet and consolidate their findings. The summary of
the findings will be documented in the score sheet (see appendix b). The score sheet lists all the
indicators successively, arranged into performance areas as shown in the Benchbook. It also
consists of eight columns.
The task of the self-assessment team is to consolidate the findings from the different areas into one
result and record this in the score sheet. The hospital must meet all elements/requirements of the
evidence in all applicable hospital areas in order to say that compliance to the evidence is achieved.
After consolidating all the evidences, the assessment team has to decide on the score for the
indicator. The following scale is used for scoring the indicators:
1 =0% compliance to the indicator
2 =1 - 49 % compliance to the indicator
3 =50 99 % compliance to the indicator
4 =100 % compliance to the indicator
For core indicators (see figure 1), compliance may either be all or nothing. Thus, the hospitals may
only get a score of 1 or 4. For non-core indicators, the scoring depends on whether the indicator is
qualitative or quantitative.
Page 4 of 76
Figure 1. Example of a core indicator 1.1.a.1 All patient charts have signed consent. Notice that
the only possible scores for this indicator are 1 (0% compliance) and 4 (100% compliance).
Quantitative indicators require computation, usually of the proportion of a sample that met a certain
requirement e.g. Percentage of charts with progress notes by doctors (see figure 2). The formula for
computation is reflected in the evidence. The resulting percentage is verified against the scale to get
the actual score for that indicator.
Figure 2. 2.3.2.c.2 Percentage of charts with progress notes by nurses
Qualitative indicators, on the other hand, do not require a randomly selected sample. Rather, it
involves compliance to the listed evidence. The self-assessment team, upon consolidating the
findings from the different hospital, computes for the proportion of the listed evidence that the hospital
has complied with. In 1.1.b.1 for example (figure 3), there are four listed evidences. If the hospital
has all the enumerated policies i.e. 4 out of the 4 evidences, then that is 100%. Following the scale,
the score of the hospital for 1.1.b.1 is 4. If for example, the hospital only had 2 of the enumerated
policies i.e. 2 of the 4 evidences or 50%, again, using the scale, the hospital would get a score of 3.
Figure 3. 1.1.b.1 Presence of policies and procedures to identify and address patients rights: right to
care, right to consent, freedom of choice, rights of incompetent patients.
5. COMPUTE THE OVERALL SCORES
After finalizing the scores for all the indicators, the overall score of the hospital may now be
computed. To start, the indicator scores need to be averaged per criterion. The averaging includes
the scores for the core indicators.
The criteria and the indicators for each criterion must be identified. The
CODE will be of use in identifying which indicators belong to which criterion.
For Patient Rights and Organizational Ethics and Improving Performance, the
code is only four characters (e.g. 1.1.b.1). The first character represents the
performance area (e.g. 1.1.b.1). The second character represents the
standard (e.g. 1.1.b.1. The third character, a letter, represents the criterion
(e.g. 1.1.b.1) and the last character, the indicator (e.g. 1.1.b.1).
Page 5 of 76
The five-character alphanumeric code for Patient Care, Leadership and
Management, Human Resource Management, Information Management and
Safe Practice and Environment represents the performance area, sub-area,
standard, criterion (letter code) and indicator respectively.
There are a few standards that
do not have a criterion. The
criterion is assigned x as the
letter code. In these cases, the
standard will serve as the
criterion. All indicators under
that standard will then be
averaged to get the criterion
score.
Figure 4 shows a few examples
of such indicators. Standard
7.4 and 7.5 both have only one
indicator each while the
standard 7.6 has 3 indicators
7.6.x.1, 7.6.x.2 and 7.6.x.3
The computation of criterion
scores is illustrated in the
following example:
In figure 5, 1.1.a.1 under
Patient Rights and
Organizational Ethics is the
lone indicator for the criterion
whereas 1.2.a.1, 1.2.a.2 and
1.2.a.3 all belong to just one
criterion. Thus, the aggregation
for the sample scores will be as
follows:
Aggregated criterion score =
(score for indicator 1 +score for
indicator 2 + +score for
indicator n) n
*(n is the number of indicators
for the criterion)
1.1.a.1 =4
1.1.b.1 =1
1.1.c.1 =3
1.1.d.1 =3
(1.2.a.1 +1.2.a.2 +
1.2.a.3) 3 (#of
indicators for the
criterion) =(3 +3 +4) 3
=3.33
1.2.b.1 =3
(1.3.a.1 +1.3.a.2) 2 =
(3 +2) 2 =2.5
1.3.b.1 =2
Figure 4
Figure 5.
Sample score
sheet
Page 6 of 76
Scores for the performance area can then be computed as follows:
Performance area score (%) =(Sum of all criterion scores Maximum possible score for the
performance area) x 100
Maximum possible score =Number of criteria for the performance area x 4 (maximum score)
With the computed performance area scores and percentage compliance to CORE indicators (which
should be 100%), the hospital may now refer to the Table of Accreditation Awards. The Table of
Accreditation Awards lists the percentage compliance needed for each award. The hospital may
apply for the award where their scores the application form and in the Benchbook Self-Assessment
Summary (Appendix C).
Accreditation
Award
Criteria
Center of Safety
Compliance to 100% of CORE indicators
+
60 % compliance to each of the following:
Patients Rights and Organizational Ethics
Safe Practice and Environment
Patient Care
Center of Quality
Compliance to 100% of CORE indicators
+
75 % compliance to each of the following:
Patients Rights and Organizational Ethics
Safe Practice and Environment
Patient Care
Information Management
Human Resource Management
Leadership and Management
Center of Excellence
Compliance to 100% of CORE indicators
+
90% compliance to each of the 7 performance areas
Page 7 of 76
NOT FOR CIRCULATION
BENCHBOOK for HOSPITALS
Self Assessment and Survey Tool
SECTION 1 - DOCUMENT REVIEW
1. PATIENT RIGHTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS
Goal: To improve patient outcomes by respecting patients' rights and ethically relating with patients and other organizations
1.1.b.1 Organizational policies and
procedures respect and support
patients' right to quality care and
their responsibilities in that care.
Policies and procedures
which identify and address
patients rights and
responsibilities are
documented and
monitored.
Presence of policies and
procedures to identify and
address patients' rights:
right to care, right to consent,
freedom of choice, rights of
incompetent patient (ex.
minors)
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
1. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: right to care
2. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: right to consent
3. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: freedom of choice
4. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: rights of incompetent
patients (minors)
1.1.d.1 Organizational policies and
procedures respect and support
patients' right to quality care and
their responsibilities in that care.
The hospital protects
patients and respects their
rights during research
involving human subjects
Presence of policies and
procedures to protect patients
and respect their rights during
research involving human
subjects
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Policies and procedures on conduct of research involving patients:
benefits and risks, informed consent, etc.
INTERVIEW
If hospital has done or has an ongoing research study involving patients:
Ask leaders/researcher during leadership meeting regarding recruitment
of participants, informed consent, confidentiality, etc
1.2.a.1 The organization encourages and
promotes opportunities to involve
patients and their families in their
care.
Policies and programs to
educate patients and
families on how to take a
more pro-active role in
health care decision
making are documented,
monitored and evaluated
for their effectiveness.
Presence of policies
regarding active participation
of patients and families in
health care decisions
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
1. Policies on patient education
2. Policies on family education
3. Policies on patient involvement in care decision-making
4. Policies on family involvement in care decision-making
1.2.a.3 The organization encourages and
promotes opportunities to involve
patients and their families in their
care.
Policies and programs to
educate patients and
families on how to take a
more pro-active role in
health care decision
making are documented,
monitored and evaluated
for their effectiveness.
Proof of ongoing policy
review to monitor and
evaluate the effectiveness of
the program on patient
education
__ __
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Monitoring reports related to patient or family education program/policy
STANDARDS CRITERIA INDICATOR REMARKS HOSP PHIC EVIDENCE CODE
1 of 43
Appendix A
Page 8 of 76
NOT FOR CIRCULATION
BENCHBOOK for HOSPITALS
Self Assessment and Survey Tool
SECTION 2 - LEADERSHIP INTERVIEW
1. PATIENT RIGHTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS
Goal: To improve patient outcomes by respecting patients' rights and ethically relating with patients and other organizations
1.1.d.1 Organizational policies and
procedures respect and support
patients' right to quality care and
their responsibilities in that care.
The hospital protects
patients and respects their
rights during research
involving human subjects
Presence of policies and
procedures to protect patients
and respect their rights during
research involving human
subjects
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Policies and procedures on conduct of research involving patients:
benefits and risks, informed consent, etc.
INTERVIEW
If hospital has done or has an ongoing research study involving patients:
Ask leaders/researcher during leadership meeting regarding recruitment
of participants, informed consent, confidentiality, etc
1.3.b.1 The organization documents and
follows policies and procedures
for addressing patients' needs for
confidentiality, privacy, security,
religious counseling and
communication.
The hospital systematically
determines, monitors and
improves the extent to
which patients' needs for
confidentiality, privacy,
security, counseling and
communication are
addressed.
Presence of patient feedback
mechanism on addressing
patients' needs for
confidentiality, privacy,
security, religious counseling
and communication
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Any reports on patient feedback monitoring e.g. analysis of patients'
suggestions, complaints and other feedback or patient satisfaction
survey result
INTERVIEW
Ask leaders about their patient feedback mechanism and/or their patient
satisfaction survey
1.5.b.1 The organization's personnel
discharge their functions
according to codes of ethical
behavior and other relevant
professional and statutory
standards.
The organization identifies
and monitors personnel
compliance with the code
of ethics relevant to their
respective disciplines.
Presence of policies and
procedures on monitoring
compliance of personnel with
codes of professional conduct
relevant to their respective
disciplines
__
__
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Policies and procedures on monitoring compliance to codes of
professional conduct relevant to their respective discipline
INTERVIEW
1. Ask leaders regarding their compliance with the codes of professional
conduct e.g. advertisement of services by doctors, sponsorship of
hospital activities by drug companies
2. Ask doctors, nurses and other staff from wards, ER, OPD, imaging
and laboratory regarding their compliance with the codes of professional
conduct e.g. advertisement of services by doctors, sponsorship of
hospital activities by drug companies
Note : Proof of compliance may include: the establishment of an Ethics
Committee that will regularly review these codes, undertake education
of staff on ethical conduct, recommend regulatory policies and
disciplinary measures
STANDARDS CRITERIA INDICATOR REMARKS HOSP PHIC EVIDENCE CODE
1 of 14
Appendix A
Page 9 of 76
Benchbook for Hospitals Score Sheet
1. PATIENT RIGHTS AND ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS
1.1.a.1
core __ __
DOCUMENT
Patient charts - sample charts of patients currently admitted. If hospital is
departmentalized, get samples during tour of the different departments.
Formula: No. of patient charts with signed consent / no. of patient charts
reviewed x 100
Sample size:10% or 10 charts whichever is lower
Note: *Informed consent - includes a patient-doctor discussion of the ff
issues: the nature of the decision or procedure; reasonable alternatives to
the proposed intervention; the relative risks, benefits, and uncertainties
related to each alternative; assessment to patient understanding; and
patient's acceptance or refusal of the intervention.
Wards 1
4
1
4
1.1.b.1
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
1. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: right to care
2. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: right to consent
3. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: freedom of choice
4. Policies and procedures on patients' rights: rights of incompetent
patients (minors)
Document review 1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1.1.c.1
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT or OBSERVATION
Written statements of patient rights and responsibilities given to patients or
Information Education Campaign (IEC) materials on patient rights and
responsibilities such as posters, flyers, pamphlets, audio-visual
presentation, etc. Check the following areas: admitting section, ER,
wards and OPD.
INTERVIEW
Ask patients from ER, wards or OPD what their rights and responsibilities
are
ER
Wards
OPD
Others - admitting
section
1
3
4
1
3
4
1.1.d.1
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Policies and procedures on conduct of research involving patients:
benefits and risks, informed consent, etc.
INTERVIEW
If hospital has done or has an ongoing research study involving patients:
Ask leaders/researcher during leadership meeting regarding recruitment of
participants, informed consent, confidentiality, etc
Document review
Leadership meeting
1
3
4
1
3
4
1.2.a.1
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
1. Policies on patient education
2. Policies on family education
3. Policies on patient involvement in care decision-making
4. Policies on family involvement in care decision-making
Document review 1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1.2.a.2
__ __
CHART REVIEW
Patient charts from medical records - check the nurses' notes/doctor's
orders for health education, advice and home instructions
Formula: Number of charts with health education, advice and home
instructions/ Number of charts reviewed
Sample size: 10 charts from the medical records or 10% whichever is
lower
Chart review 1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1.2.a.3
__ __
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Monitoring reports related to patient or family education program/policy
Document review 1
4
1
4
1.2.b.1
__
__
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
Policies and procedures on involvement of patients and families in making
care decisions on ethical issues to include the ff:
Right of unconscious patients
Right to dignity
Right to appropriate care based on religious and personal beliefs etc.
INTERVIEW
1. Ask the doctors and nurses in the ER, wards or ICU on how they
involve the patients' families on making care decisions with ethical issues
2. Ask the patient or patient's family (ER, wards or ICU) if the
doctor/hospital staff involves them in making care decisions with ethical
issues e.g. In medicine ward, you may ask about advance directives, truth
telling to the dying, diet (Muslims, vegetarian). In ICU, ask about proxy
consent. In surgery and OB wards - procedures involving reproductive
tract (BTL, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, sexual reassignment)
Document review
ER
Wards
ICU
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1.3.a.1
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
DOCUMENT REVIEW
1. Policies and procedures that address patients' needs for confidentiality
2. Policies and procedures that address patients' needs for privacy
3. Policies and procedures that address patients' needs for security
4. Policies and procedures that address patients' needs for religious
counseling
5. Policies and procedures that address patients' needs for
communication
Note: Take note of the provisions of the policies for use in interview during
survey of wards, ER, imaging and laboratory
Document review 1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
CODE
SELF-
ASSESSMENT
SCORE
SURVEYOR
SCORE
REMARKS HOSP PHIC EVIDENCE SECTION
Scoring:
1: 0% compliance to the indicator
2: 1 - 49% compliance to the indicator
3: 50 - 99% compliance to the indicator
4: 100% compliance to the indicator 1 of 23
Appendix B
Page 10 of 76
B
B
B
E
E
E
N
N
N
C
C
C
H
H
H
B
B
B
O
O
O
O
O
O
K
K
K
S
S
S
E
E
E
L
L
L
F
F
F
-
-
-
A
A
A
S
S
S
S
S
S
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
S
S
M
M
M
E
E
E
N
N
N
T
T
T
S
S
S
U
U
U
M
M
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
R
R
R
Y
Y
Y