This document discusses public goods and publicly provided private goods. It defines public goods as having non-excludability and non-rival consumption. Publicly provided private goods can be excludable and rivalrous. Efficient provision of public goods requires that the sum of marginal rates of substitution equals the marginal rate of transformation. Publicly provided private goods require rationing methods like user fees, uniform provision, or queuing, each with inefficiencies.
This document discusses public goods and publicly provided private goods. It defines public goods as having non-excludability and non-rival consumption. Publicly provided private goods can be excludable and rivalrous. Efficient provision of public goods requires that the sum of marginal rates of substitution equals the marginal rate of transformation. Publicly provided private goods require rationing methods like user fees, uniform provision, or queuing, each with inefficiencies.
This document discusses public goods and publicly provided private goods. It defines public goods as having non-excludability and non-rival consumption. Publicly provided private goods can be excludable and rivalrous. Efficient provision of public goods requires that the sum of marginal rates of substitution equals the marginal rate of transformation. Publicly provided private goods require rationing methods like user fees, uniform provision, or queuing, each with inefficiencies.
This document discusses public goods and publicly provided private goods. It defines public goods as having non-excludability and non-rival consumption. Publicly provided private goods can be excludable and rivalrous. Efficient provision of public goods requires that the sum of marginal rates of substitution equals the marginal rate of transformation. Publicly provided private goods require rationing methods like user fees, uniform provision, or queuing, each with inefficiencies.
The key takeaways are that public goods have the properties of non-excludability and non-rival consumption, and there is a spectrum between pure public goods and privately provided goods based on these properties.
The two critical properties of public goods are that it is impossible to exclude individuals from enjoying the benefits (non-excludability) and the marginal cost of an additional individual enjoying the good is zero (non-rival consumption).
A pure public good is one where exclusion is impossible and marginal cost of additional users is zero, while impure public goods may have some ability to exclude users or marginal costs for additional users. Many publicly provided goods fall somewhere in between.
Economics of the Public Sector
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE THEORY
5. Public goods and publicly provided private goods 5.1. Public goods 5.2. Publicly provided private goods 5.3. Efficiency conditions for public goods 5.4. Efficient government as a public good Public goods and publicly provided private goods public goods Public goods have two critical properties:
It is impossible to exclude individuals from enjoying the benefits of the goods (NON-EXCLUDABILITY)
The marginal cost of an additional individual enjoying the good is zero (NON-RIVAL CONSUMPTION). It is undesirable to exclude individuals from enjoying the benefits of the goods, since their enjoyment of these goods does not detract from the enjoyment of others. Public goods and publicly provided private goods public goods PAYING FOR PUBLIC GOODS Bridges: How a User Fee Can Result in Underconsumption
If the capacity is large enough, the bridge is a non-rival good. While it is possible to exclude people from using the bridge by charging a toll, p, this results in an underconsumption of the good, Q e , below the non-toll level of consumption, Q m .
When consumption is non-rival, user fees introduce an inefficiency. Price (toll) Number of trips taken p Q e Q m Q c
Demand curve for trips Bridge capacity The free rider problem Public goods and publicly provided private goods public goods PURE AND IMPURE PUBLIC GOODS A pure public good is a public good where the marginal costs of providing it to an additional person are strictly zero and where it is impossible to exclude people from receiving the good.
While there are a few examples of pure public goods, such as national defense, for many publicly provided goods exclusion is possible, although frequently costly.
Charging for use may result in the underutilization of public facilities.
For many publicly provided goods, there is some marginal cost of an individual enjoying the good. While the marginal cost of an individual using a completely uncongested road may be negligible, if there is some congestion, the marginal cost may be more significant. Public goods and publicly provided private goods public goods Publicly Provided Goods Pure public goods are characterized by non-rival consumption (the MC of an additional individuals enjoying the good is zero) and non-excludability (the cost of excluding an individual from enjoying the good is prohibitively high). Goods provided by the public sector differ in the extent to which they have these two properties. Marginal cost of use Ease of exclusion Congested highway PURE PUBLIC GOOD National defense Public health PURE PRIVATE GOOD Fire protection Publicly provided private goods Lighthouse Public goods and publicly provided private goods public goods PURE AND IMPURE PUBLIC GOODS
Costs of exclusion For many goods, the issue is not so much the feasibility of rationing, but the cost. The costs associated with exclusion for private goods as well as for public goods are called transactions costs.
Externalities as impure public goods or better stated: public goods can be viewed as an extreme form of externalities. Public goods and publicly provided private goods publicly provided private goods For many publicly provided goods, consumption is rivalrous (consumption by one individual reduces that of another) or the marginal cost of supplying an extra individual may be significant, equal to, or even greater than, average cost. These are called PUBLICLY PROVIDED PRIVATE GOODS. If they are provided freely, there will be overconsumption.
For publicly provided private goods, some method of RATIONING other than the price system may be used. Sometimes queuing is used, while at other times the good is simply provided in fixed quantities to all individuals (uniform provision). Both of these entail inefficiencies. Public goods and publicly provided private goods publicly provided private goods Distortions Associated with Supplying Goods Freely
(A) For some goods, such as water, supplying the good freely rather than at MC results in relatively little additional consumption. (B) For other goods, such as certain medical services, supplying the good freely rather than at MC results in extensive overconsumption. Price Price Quantity Quantity MC MC Demand curve Demand curve Q e Q m
Q e Q m
Quantity Welfare loss from excessive consumption Welfare loss from excessive consumption (A) (B) Public goods and publicly provided private goods publicly provided private goods RATIONING DEVICES FOR PUBLICLY PROVIDED PRIVATE GOODS Transactions Costs When transactions costs are sufficiently high, it may be more efficient to supply the good publicly than to have the good supplied by private markets. A B E F D MC=c p* Q e Q o Q m
Transactions costs c, production costs Demand curve Price Quantity Public goods and publicly provided private goods publicly provided private goods RATIONING DEVICES FOR PUBLICLY PROVIDED PRIVATE GOODS Distortions Associated with Uniform Provision When publicly provided private good is supplied in equal amounts to all individuals, some get more than the efficient level and some get less. Quantity Price Q 2 Q 1 Q* C Demand curve of high demander Demand curve of low demander MC of production Public goods and publicly provided private goods publicly provided private goods THREE METHODS OF RATIONING PUBLICLY PROVIDED GOODS 1. User charges Advantage: Those who benefit bear costs. Disadvantages: Results in underconsumption. Administering pricing system adds transactions costs. 2. Uniform provision Advantage: Saves on transactions costs Disadvantages: Leads some to underconsume, others to overconsume. High demanders may supplement public consumption increasing total transactions costs. 3. Queuing Advantage: Goods (like health care) allocated not necessarily on basis of who is wealthiest. Disadvantages: Alternative basis of allocation (who has time to spare) may be undesirable. Time is wasted. Public goods and publicly provided private goods publicly provided private goods MEASURING THE WELFARE COST OF USER FEES Bridges: How a User Fee Can Result in Welfare Loss
As a result of a toll, p, some trips across the bridge are not taken even though they would be beneficial to society as a whole.
Total welfare loss created by the toll is represented by a shaded region. p Price (toll) Numbers of trips taken Bridge capacity Q e Q c Q m Demand for trips Welfare loss Trips not undertaken as a result of charging a toll Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods Pure public goods are efficiently supplied when the sum of the marginal rates of substitution (over all individuals) is equal to the marginal rate of transformation.
The MRS of private goods for public goods tells how much of the private good each individual is willing to give up to get one more unit of the public good. The sum of MRS thus tells us how much of the private good all the members of society, together, are willing to give up to get one more unit of the public (which will be jointly consumed by all).
The MRT tells us how much of the private good must be given up to get one more unit of the public good.
Efficiency requires, then, that the total amount individuals are willing to give up the sum of the MRS must equal the amount that they have to give up the MRT. Determination of the Efficient Level of Production of Public Goods
(A) If the level of public goods is G, and the first individual is to get level of utility U 1 , then the distance AB represents the amount of private goods left over for the second individual. (B) The second individuals welfare is maximized at the point of tangency of his indifference curve and the leftover curve. U 1
A B B G U 2 U 2
Private good Private good Public good Public good Production possibilities curve Crusoes indifference curve Fridays indifference curve Leftover curve A (A) (B) Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods DEMAND CURVES FOR PUBLIC GOODS Individuals do not buy public goods. We can, however, ask how much they would demand if they had to pay a given amount for each extra unit of the public good. We call the extra payment that an individual has to make for extra unit of public good his TAX PRICE. Assume that the individuals tax price is p, that is for each unit of the public good, he has to pay p. His budget constraint is: C + pG = Y, where: C is his consumption of private goods, G is the total amount of public goods, and Y is his income.
The individual wishes to obtain the highest level of utility he can. It is attained at the point of tangency between the indifference curve and the budget constraint. The slope of the budget constraint tells how much in private goods the individual must give up to get one more unit of public goods. The slope of the indifference curve tells how much in private goods the individual is willing to give up to get one more unit of public goods. Individual Demand Curve for Public Goods
The individuals most preferred level of expenditure is the point of tangency between the indifference curve and the budget constraint.
As the tax price decreases (the budget constraint shifts from BB to BB), the individuals most preferred level of public expenditure increases, generating the demand curve. E E B G 2 G 1
p 1
G 2
E E B B Indifference curves Budget constraints Private consumption Tax price Consumption of public goods p 2
G 1
Quantity of public goods Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods Collective Demand for Public Goods Since at each point on the demand curve the price is equal to the MRS, by adding the demand curves vertically we obtain the sum of the MRS, the total amount of private goods that the individuals in society are willing to give up to get one more unit of the public good. The vertical sum thus can be thought of as generating the collective demand curve for the public good. Tax price paid by Crusoe Tax price paid by Friday G Quantity of public goods $ Collective demand curve Crusoes demand curve for public goods Fridays demand curve for public goods Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods The demand curve can be thought of as marginal willingness to pay curve at each level of output of the public good, it says how much the individual would be willing to pay for an extra unit of the public good.
Thus, the vertical sum of demand curves is just the sum of their marginal willingness to pay, that is, it is the total amount that all individuals together are willing to pay for an extra unit of the public good.
A supply curve for each level of output, the price represents how much of the other goods have to be forgone to produce one more unit of public goods. This is the marginal cost, or marginal rate of transformation. Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods Efficient Production of Public Goods
An efficient supply of public goods occurs at the point of intersection of the demand curve and the supply curve. The collective demand curve gives the sum of what all individuals are willing to give up, at the margin, to have one more unit of public goods, while the supply curve gives the amount of other goods that have to be given up to obtain one more unit of the public good. Supply curve Collective demand curve Price Quantity Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods EFFICIENCY CONDITION FOR PURE PUBLIC GOODS
Efficient production requires that the sum of the marginal rates of substitution equal the marginal rate of transformation.
Efficient production occurs at the intersection of the collective demand curve, formed by vertically adding the demand curves for each individual, with the supply curve. Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods PARETO EFFICIENCY & INCOME DISTRIBUTION
There are many Pareto efficient resource allocations: any point on the utility possibilities schedule is Pareto efficient. The market equilibrium in the absence of market failures corresponds to just one of those points.
By the same token there, is not a unique Pareto optimal supply of public goods. The fact that the efficient level of public goods depends, in general, on the distribution of income has one important implication: one cannot separate out efficiency conditions in the supply of public goods from distributional consideration.
Any change in the distribution of income, say, brought about by a change in the income tax structure, will thus be accompanied by corresponding changes in the efficient levels of public goods production. Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods LIMITATIONS ON INCOME REDISTRIBUTION AND THE EFFICIENT SUPPLY OF PUBLIC GOODS The fact that redistributing resources through the tax and welfare systems is costly implies that the government may look for alternative ways to achieve its redistributive goals. One way is to incorporate redistributive considerations into its evaluation of public projects.
DISTORTIONARY TAXATION AND THE EFFICIENT SUPPLY OF PUBLIC GOODS The fact that the revenue raised to finance public goods is raised through distortionary taxes, such as the income tax, has some important implications for the efficient supply of public goods.
The amount of private goods that individuals must give up to get one more unit of public goods is greater then it would be if the government could raise revenue ia a way that did not entail distortionary incentive effects and that was costly to administer. Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods DISTORTIONARY TAXATION AND THE EFFICIENT SUPPLY OF PUBLIC GOODS
The Feasibility Curve
It gives the maximum output (consumption) of private goods for any level of public goods, taking into account the inefficiencies that arise from taxes that must be imposed to raise the requisite revenue. The feasibility curve lies below the production possibilities curve. Private good Public good Feasibility curve Production possibilities curve Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficiency conditions for public goods The amount of private goods we have to give up to obtain one more unit of public goods, taking into account all inefficiencies, is called the MARGINAL ECONOMIC RATE OF TRANSFORMATION, as opposed to the MARGINAL PHYSICAL RATE OF TRANSFORMATION.
Thus we replace the earlier condition that the marginal rate of physical transformation must equal the sum of the marginal rates of substitution with a new condition, that the marginal rate of economic transformation must equal the sum of the marginal rates of substitution.
Since it becomes more costly to obtain public goods when taxation imposes distortions, normally this will imply that the efficient level of public goods is smaller than it would have been with nondistorionary taxation. Public goods and publicly provided private goods efficient government as a public good One of the most important public goods is the management of the government