The document discusses the design of collapse-resistant structures. It notes that current design methods are inadequate as they only consider structural resistance on a local level and do not account for accidental events. It presents various strategies for designing collapse-resistant structures, including increasing specific local resistance of key elements, providing alternate load paths, and compartmentalization through isolation. Examples of structures that employ these strategies, such as the Confederation Bridge and Pentagon Building, are provided. The document concludes that collapse-resistant design should use deterministic methods and that specific local resistance, alternate load paths, and compartmentalization are all valid design options.
The document discusses the design of collapse-resistant structures. It notes that current design methods are inadequate as they only consider structural resistance on a local level and do not account for accidental events. It presents various strategies for designing collapse-resistant structures, including increasing specific local resistance of key elements, providing alternate load paths, and compartmentalization through isolation. Examples of structures that employ these strategies, such as the Confederation Bridge and Pentagon Building, are provided. The document concludes that collapse-resistant design should use deterministic methods and that specific local resistance, alternate load paths, and compartmentalization are all valid design options.
The document discusses the design of collapse-resistant structures. It notes that current design methods are inadequate as they only consider structural resistance on a local level and do not account for accidental events. It presents various strategies for designing collapse-resistant structures, including increasing specific local resistance of key elements, providing alternate load paths, and compartmentalization through isolation. Examples of structures that employ these strategies, such as the Confederation Bridge and Pentagon Building, are provided. The document concludes that collapse-resistant design should use deterministic methods and that specific local resistance, alternate load paths, and compartmentalization are all valid design options.
The document discusses the design of collapse-resistant structures. It notes that current design methods are inadequate as they only consider structural resistance on a local level and do not account for accidental events. It presents various strategies for designing collapse-resistant structures, including increasing specific local resistance of key elements, providing alternate load paths, and compartmentalization through isolation. Examples of structures that employ these strategies, such as the Confederation Bridge and Pentagon Building, are provided. The document concludes that collapse-resistant design should use deterministic methods and that specific local resistance, alternate load paths, and compartmentalization are all valid design options.
Hamburg University of Technology Design of Collapse-Resistant Structures Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 2/19 Hamburg University of Technology robustness progressive collapse structural integrity alternate load paths continuity redundancy Keywords isolation compartmentalization specific local resistance Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 3/19 Hamburg University of Technology progressive collapse disproportion between local failure and resulting collapse Some definitions robustness insensitivity to local failure collapse resistance insensitivity to accidental circumstances Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 4/19 Hamburg University of Technology measurements and observations admissible probability of failure probability density functions (actions, resistances) reliability theory societal consensus design values (actions, resistances) Inadequacy of current design methods Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 5/19 Hamburg University of Technology Inadequacy of current design methods structural resistance considered on local level only (and not on system level) accidental circumstances are neglected (low probability events and unforeseeable incidents) admissible failure probability cannot be specified (risk of the type low probability / high consequence) Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 6/19 Hamburg University of Technology Inadequacy of current design methods dont rely on reliability theory use deterministic methods for design purposes Conclusion Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 7/19 Hamburg University of Technology Design criteria
Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff:
Design of collapse-resistant structures 8/19 Hamburg University of Technology depend on significance as to consequences of collapse (immediate losses, impairment of infrastructure, civil defense, national defense) depend on exposure to accidental circumstances (hazards of war, malicious action, natural disasters) high for public buildings, major bridges, lifeline structures Requirements (necessity of collapse resistance) Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 9/19 Hamburg University of Technology assumable extent of accidental circumstances assumable extent of initial local failure acceptable extent of collapse progression acceptable extent of damage to remaining structure applicable load combinations and safety factors Design objectives Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 10/19 Hamburg University of Technology prevent local failure (high safety against local failure) specific local resistance of key elements non-structural protective measures presume local failure (design for load case local failure) alternate load paths isolation by compartmentalization prescriptive design rules Design strategies Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 11/19 Hamburg University of Technology isolation by compartmentalization Design strategies Examples key element modification of structural system strengthening of transfer girder design for load case local failure provide alternate load paths (= redundancy) Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 12/19 Hamburg University of Technology Confederation Bridge, Canada alternate load paths cannot be provided isolation by compartmentalization Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 13/19 Hamburg University of Technology 43 42 1
Confederation Bridge, Canada insertion of hinges Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 14/19 Hamburg University of Technology Confederation Bridge, Canada insertion of hinges compartment borders must be able to sustain either large forces or large displacements reduction of continuity can lead to increase of robustness Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 15/19 Hamburg University of Technology More examples isolation by compartmentalization Pentagon Building Paris Airport Terminal weak strong weak weak Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 16/19 Hamburg University of Technology Murrah Federal Building Structural system More examples isolation by compartmentalization collapse stopped at rebar discontinuity in transfer girder Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 17/19 Hamburg University of Technology A comparison either less continuity or more strength more continuity, more strength properties of design measures large initial failures small initial failures preferable for no yes sensitive to initial failure size at discrete locations distributed over system location of design measures alternate load paths compartmentalization Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 18/19 Hamburg University of Technology collapse-resistant design should be based on deterministic methods specific local resistance, alternate load paths, and isola- tion by compartmentalization are all viable design options continuity redundancy robustness collapse resistance Some conclusions a complete set of corresponding design criteria should be developed and implemented in the codes Uwe Starossek, Maren Wolff: Design of collapse-resistant structures 19/19 Hamburg University of Technology Thank you!