Notation: Pci Bridge Design Manual

NOTATION
2.1 SCOPE
2.2 PLANT PRODUCTS
2.2.1 Advantages
2.3 CONCRETE MATERIALS
2.3.1 Cement
2.3.1.1 AASHTO M85
2.3.1.2 AASHTO M240
2.3.1.3 Restrictions
2.3.2 Aggregates
2.3.3 Chemical Admixtures
2.3.3.1 Purpose
2.3.3.2 Calcium Chloride
2.3.3.3 Corrosion Inhibitors
2.3.3.4 Air-Entraining Admixtures
2.3.4 Mineral Admixtures
2.3.4.1 Pozzolans
2.3.4.2 Silica Fume
2.3.5 Water
2.4 SELECTION OF CONCRETE MIX REQUIREMENTS
2.4.1 Concrete Strength at Release
2.4.2 Concrete Strength at Service Loads
2.4.3 High Performance Concrete
2.4.4 Durability
2.4.4.1 Freeze-Thaw Damage
2.4.5 Workability
2.4.6 Water-Cementitious Materials Ratio
2.4.6.1 Based on Strength
2.4.6.2 Based on Durability
2.4.7 Unit Weight
2.4.7.1 Normal Weight Concrete
2.4.7.2 Lightweight Concrete
2.4.7.3 Blended Aggregates
2.4.8 Effect of Heat Curing
2.4.9 Sample Mixes
PCI BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
OCT 97
4402 Bridge Manual Ch2 8/18/03 12:18 PM Page 1
2.5 CONCRETE PROPERTIES
2.5.1 Introduction
2.5.2 Compressive Strength
2.5.2.1 Variation with Time
2.5.2.2 Effect of Accelerated Curing
2.5.3 Modulus of Elasticity
2.5.3.1 Calculations (E
c
)
2.5.3.2 Variations (E
c
)
2.5.4 Modulus of Rupture
2.5.5 Durability
2.5.6 Heat of Hydration
2.5.7 Shrinkage
2.5.7.1 Calculation of Shrinkage
2.5.8 Creep
2.5.8.1 Calculation of Creep
2.5.9 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion
2.6 GROUT MATERIALS
2.6.1 Definitions and Applications
2.6.2 Types and Characteristics of Grout
2.6.2.1 Performance Requirements
2.6.2.2 Materials
2.6.3 ASTM Tests
2.6.4 Grout Bed Materials
2.6.5 Epoxy Resins
2.6.6 Overlays
2.6.7 Post-Tensioned Members
2.7 PRESTRESSING STRAND
2.7.1 Strand Types
2.7.1.1 Epoxy-Coated Strand
2.7.1.1.1 Effect of Heat
2.7.2 Material Properties
2.7.3 Relaxation
2.7.3.1 Epoxy-Coated Strand
2.7.4 Fatigue Strength
2.7.4.1 Stress Range
2.7.5 Surface Condition
2.7.6 Splicing
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
OCT 97
2.8 NONPRESTRESSED REINFORCEMENT
2.8.1 Deformed Bars
2.8.1.1 Specifications
2.8.1.2 Corrosion Protection
2.8.2 Mechanical Splices
2.8.2.1 Types
2.8.3 Welded Wire Reinforcement
2.8.4 Fatigue Strength
2.9 POST-TENSIONING MATERIALS
2.9.1 Strand Systems
2.9.2 Bar Systems
2.9.3 Splicing
2.9.4 Ducts
2.10 FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC REINFORCEMENT
2.10.1 Introduction
2.10.2 Mechanical Properties
2.10.2.1 Short-Term
2.10.2.2 Long-Term
2.10.3 Applications
2.10.4 Products
2.11 REINFORCEMENT SIZES AND PROPERTIES
Table 2.11.1 Properties and Design Strengths of Prestressing Steel
Figure 2.11.1 Idealized Stress-Strain Curve for Seven-Wire Low-Relaxation
Prestressing Strand
Table 2.11.2 Reinforcing Bar Sizes
Table 2.11.3 Common Stock Styles of Welded Wire Reinforcement
Table 2.11.4 Sizes of Wires used in Welded Wire Reinforcement
2.12 RELEVANT STANDARDS AND PUBLICATIONS
2.12.1 AASHTO Standard Specifications
2.12.2 AASHTO Standard Methods of Test
2.12.3 ACI Publications
2.12.4 ASTM Standard Specifications
2.12.5 ASTM Standard Test Methods
2.12.6 Cross References ASTM-AASHTO
2.12.7 Cited References
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
OCT 97
NOTATION
A = constant
A
*
s
= nominal area of prestressing steel
B = constant
C(t, t
0
) = creep coefficient at a concrete age of t days
C
u
= ultimate creep coefficient
(E
c
)
t
= modulus of elasticity of concrete at an age of t days
f
c
= specified concrete compressive strength
f
ci
= the concrete compressive strength at time of initial prestress
(f
c
)
t
= concrete compressive strength at an age of t days
(f
c
)
28
= concrete compressive strength at an age of 28 days
f
f
= fatigue stress range in reinforcement
f
min
= minimum stress level in reinforcement
f
ps
= stress in prestressing strand
f
r
= modulus of rupture
f
s
= ultimate strength of prestressing steel
H = annual average ambient relative humidity
k
c
= product of applicable correction factors = k
la
x k
h
x k
s
k
cp
= correction factor for curing period
k
h
= correction factor for relative humidity
k
la
= correction factor for loading age
k
s
= correction factor for size of member
k
sh
= product of applicable correction factors = k
cp
x k
h
x k
s
K = constant
r/h = ratio of base radius to height of transverse deformation on reinforcement
S = surface area of concrete exposed to drying
S(t, t
0
) = shrinkage strain at a concrete age of t days
S
u
= ultimate shrinkage strain
t = age of concrete
t
la
= loading ages
t
0
= age of concrete at the end of the initial curing period
V = volume of concrete
w
c
= unit weight of concrete
ps
= strain in prestressing strand
= concrete weight factor taken as 1.0 for normal weight concrete, 0.85 for
sand-lightweight concrete, and 0.75 for all-lightweight concrete
NOTATION
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
OCT 97
This chapter contains a description of the properties of all major materials currently
used for precast, prestressed concrete bridge structures. It includes a discussion of
concrete constituent materials, mix requirements, hardened concrete properties, pre-
tensioning and post-tensioning reinforcement, nonprestressed reinforcement and
grouts used between precast members and other components. Recent developments
in high performance concrete and nonmetallic reinforcement are also introduced.
Discussion of the materials used in fabrication and construction is included in
Chapter 3.
The production of precast concrete components in a plant environment offers sever-
al advantages compared to on-site production. Many of these advantages occur
because one company is responsible for quality control throughout production. This
results in closer monitoring of raw materials, steel placement, concrete production
and delivery, concrete curing and shipment. The overall effect is to produce a prod-
uct with more consistent material properties than can be achieved with site-cast con-
crete.
In many aspects, the material properties of precast components are superior to those of
cast-in-place members. Precast concrete components are required to achieve a mini-
mum concrete strength for release and removal from their precasting beds at an early
age (12 to 18 hours). This often results in a concrete that has a 28-day compressive
strength in excess of the specified 28-day strength. Consequently, the concrete has a
higher modulus of elasticity and less creep than would occur if the actual strength were
equal to the specified strength. The use of accelerated curing to achieve the release
strength also results in less shrinkage and creep. From a durability aspect, precast con-
crete members have a low permeability and, therefore, are better suited for use in
aggressive environments such as coastal areas and areas where deicing salts are used.
The five major component materials of concrete produced today are cement, aggre-
gates, chemical admixtures, mineral admixtures and water.
Cement for use in bridge construction generally conforms to one of the following
specifications:
AASHTO M85 Portland Cement
AASHTO M240 Blended Hydraulic Cement
The AASHTO Specification M85 lists eight types of portland cement as follows:
Type I Normal
Type IA Normal, air-entraining
Type II Moderate sulphate resistant
Type IIA Moderate sulphate resistant, air-entraining
OCT 97
Material Properties
2.1
SCOPE
2.2
PLANT PRODUCTS
2.2.1
Advantages
2.3
CONCRETE MATERIALS
2.3.1
Cement
2.3.1.1
AASHTO M85
Type III High early strength
Type IIIA High early strength, air-entraining
Type IV Low heat of hydration
Type V High sulphate resistance
Type I portland cement is a general purpose cement suitable for all uses where the
special properties of other types of cement are not required. Type II portland cement
is used where precaution against moderate sulphate attack is important. Type II
cement can also be used to reduce the heat of hydration. Type III portland cement
provides high strengths at an early age and is particularly appropriate for obtaining
high release strengths. Type IV portland cement is used to reduce the heat of hydra-
tion and is particularly beneficial in mass concrete structures. Type V portland
cement is used in concrete exposed to severe sulphate attack. Types IA, IIA and IIIA,
correspond in composition to Types I, II and III respectively, except that small quan-
tities of air-entraining material are included in the cement.
The AASHTO Specification M240 lists six classes of blended cement as follows:
Type IS Portland blast-furnace slag cement
Type IP Portland-pozzolan cement
Type P Portland-pozzolan cement
Type S Slag cement
Type I (PM) Pozzolan-modified portland cement
Type I (SM) Slag-modified portland cement
Blended hydraulic cements are produced by intergrinding and/or blending various
combinations of portland cement, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, fly ash and
other pozzolans. These cements can be used to produce different properties in the hard-
ened concretes. Types IS, IP, I(PM) and I(SM) are used for general concrete construc-
tion. Type P is used where high early strengths are not required. Type S is used with
portland cement in concrete or with lime in mortar but is not used alone in structural
concrete.
The Standard Specifications generally restrict cement to portland cement Types I, II or
III; air-entrained portland cement Types IA, IIA or IIIA; or blended hydraulic cements
Types IP or IS. It should also be noted that not all types of cement are readily available
and that the use of some types is not permitted by some states.
Aggregates for concrete consist of fine and coarse materials. Fine aggregate for normal
weight concrete should conform to the requirements of AASHTO M6. Coarse aggre-
gate for normal weight concrete should conform to the requirements of AASHTO
M80. Lightweight aggregate for use in lightweight or sand-lightweight concrete should
conform to the requirements of AASHTO M195. The maximum size of aggregate
should be selected based on mix-requirements and the minimum clear spacing between
reinforcing steel, clear cover to reinforcing steel and thickness of the member in accor-
dance with AASHTO specifications. If aggregates susceptible to alkali-aggregate reac-
tivity are used in prestressed concrete members, special precautions must be observed.
These include the use of low alkali cements, blended cements or pozzolans.
Chemical admixtures are used in precast, prestressed concrete to provide air entrain-
ment, reduce water content, improve workability, retard setting times and accelerate
strength development. Chemical admixtures, except air-entraining admixtures,
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.3.1.1 AASHTO M85/2.3.3 Chemical Admixtures
OCT 97
2.3.1.2
AASHTO M240
2.3.1.3
Restrictions
2.3.2
Aggregates
2.3.3
Chemical Admixtures
should conform to the requirements of AASHTO M194. This specification lists the
following types of admixtures:
Type A Water-reducing
Type B Retarding
Type C Accelerating
Type D Water-reducing and retarding
Type E Water-reducing and accelerating
Type F Water-reducing, high range
Type G Water-reducing, high range and retarding
Water-reducing admixtures and high range water-reducing admixtures are used to
allow for a reduction in the water-cementitious materials ratio while maintaining or
improving workability. Accelerating admixtures are used to decrease the setting time
and increase the early strength development. They are particularly beneficial in pre-
cast concrete construction to facilitate early form removal and release of prestressing.
Since admixtures can produce different results with different cements, and at differ-
ent temperatures, selection of admixtures should be based on the plant materials and
conditions that will be utilized in production. Compatibility between admixtures is
also important and should be specifically addressed when using combinations of ad-
mixtures produced by different companies.
Calcium chloride has been used in the past as an accelerator since it is very effective
and economical. The use of calcium chloride in concrete promotes corrosion of metals
due to the presence of chloride ions. Consequently, calcium chloride should not be per-
mitted in prestressed concrete members. Accelerators without chlorides may be used.
Corrosion-inhibiting admixtures are also available for use in concrete to protect rein-
forcement from corrosion. These admixtures block the passage of chloride ions to the
steel reinforcement and, thereby, reduce or eliminate corrosion of the reinforcement.
Corrosion-inhibiting admixtures are more likely to be effective in cast-in-place bridge
components that are directly exposed to chloride ions than in precast concrete bridge
girders that are already highly impermeable.
Air-entraining admixtures are used in concrete primarily to increase the resistance of
the concrete to freeze-thaw damage when exposed to water and deicing chemicals.
They may also be used to increase workability and facilitate handling and finishing.
Air-entraining admixtures should conform to AASHTO M154. The air content of
fresh concrete is generally determined using the pressure method (AASHTO T152)
or the volumetric method (AASHTO T196). The pressure method should not be
used with lightweight concrete. A pocket-size air indicator (AASHTO T199) can be
used for quick checks but is not a substitute for the other more accurate methods.
Mineral admixtures are powdered or pulverized materials added to concrete to
improve or change the properties of hardened portland cement concrete. Mineral
admixtures are used in concrete to increase early strength development or to reduce
the heat of hydration. They may also be used to improve the resistance of concrete to
reactive aggregates and to replace cement. They have also been used in high strength
concrete to produce higher strengths at later ages. The use of mineral admixtures may
affect the workability and finishing characteristics of fresh concrete.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.3.3 Chemical Admixtures/2.3.4 Mineral Admixtures
OCT 97
2.3.3.1
Purpose
2.3.3.2
Calcium Chloride
2.3.3.3
Corrosion Inhibitors
2.3.3.4
AirEntraining Admixtures
2.3.4
Mineral Admixtures
AASHTO M295 lists three classes of mineral admixtures as follows:
Class N Raw or calcined natural pozzolans
Class F Fly ash
Class C Fly ash
High-Reactive Metakaolin (HRM) is a manufactured white powder that meets the
requirements of a Class N pozzolan. HRM has a particle size significantly smaller
than that of cement particles, but not as fine as silica fume. Fly ash is a finely divid-
ed residue that results from the combustion of pulverized coal in power generation
plants. Class F fly ash has pozzolanic properties; Class C has some cementitious prop-
erties in addition to pozzolanic properties. Some fly ashes meet both Class F and
Class C classifications. Selection of these materials will depend on their local avail-
ability and their effect on concrete properties.
Silica fume meeting the requirements of AASHTO M307 may also be used as a min-
eral admixture in concrete. Silica fume is a very fine pozzolanic material produced as
a by-product in electric arc furnaces used for the production of elemental silicon or
ferro-silicon alloys. Silica fume is also known as condensed silica fume and microsil-
ica. The use of silica fume can improve the early age strength development of con-
crete and is particularly beneficial in achieving high release strengths in high strength
concrete beams. The use of silica fume in concrete generally results in concrete that
has low permeability. The use of silica fume increases the water demand in concrete.
Consequently, it is generally used in combination with a water-reducing admixture
or a high range water-reducing admixture. Concrete containing silica fume has sig-
nificantly less bleeding and the potential for plastic shrinkage is increased. Therefore,
early moisture loss should be prevented under conditions which promote rapid sur-
face drying such as low humidity and high temperatures.
Water used in mixing concrete must be clean and free of oil, salt, acid, alkali, sugar,
vegetable or other injurious substances. Water known to be of potable quality may be
used without testing. However, if there is doubt, water should meet the requirements
of AASHTO T26. Mixing water for concrete should not contain a chloride ion con-
centration in excess of 1,000 ppm or sulfates as SO
4
in excess of 1,300 ppm.
This section discusses various aspects of concrete mix requirements that need to be
considered by the owner or the owners engineer. Selection of concrete ingredients
and proportions to meet the minimum requirements stated in the specifications and
contract documents should be the responsibility of the precast concrete producer.
Wherever possible, the mix requirements should be stated on the basis of the required
performance and not be over-restrictive to the producer. The producer should be
allowed to show through trial batches or mix history that a proposed mix design will
meet or exceed the specified performance criteria. Consequently, prescriptive require-
ments such as minimum cement content should be avoided.
For prestressed concrete bridge beams, the Engineer generally specifies minimum
strengths at time of release of the prestressing strands and at 28 days, although ages
other than 28 days may be used. The Engineer may also specify a minimum com-
pressive strength at time of beam erection, or a minimum compressive strength at
time of post-tensioning if a combination of pretensioning and post-tensioning is uti-
lized. For most prestressed concrete bridge beams, the specified strength at time of
release will control the concrete mix proportions. Based on AASHTO specifications,
the release strength is selected so that the temporary concrete stresses in the beam,
before losses due to creep and shrinkage, do not exceed 60% of the concrete com-
pressive strength at time of release in pretensioned members and 55% of the concrete
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.3.4.1 Pozzolans/2.4.1 Concrete Strength at Release
OCT 97
2.3.5
Water
2.4.1
Concrete Strength
at Release
2.4
SELECTION OF
CONCRETE MIX
REQUIREMENTS
2.3.4.2
Silica Fume
2.3.4.1
Pozzolans
compressive strength at time of stressing of post-tensioned members. In addition, the
strength is selected so that, in tension areas with no bonded reinforcement, the ten-
sile stress will not exceed 200 psi or 3 where f
ci
is the compressive strength of
concrete at time of initial prestress in psi. In areas with a specified amount of bond-
ed reinforcement, the maximum tensile stress cannot exceed 7.5 .
The design of most precast, prestressed concrete members is based on a concrete
compressive strength at 28 days of 5,000 to 6,000 psi. However, because the mix pro-
portions are generally dictated by release strengths, concrete strengths at 28 days are
frequently in excess of the specified 28-day value and actual strengths of 8,000 psi or
more are often achieved. Consequently, mix requirements are generally based on the
release strengths and the precaster only has to ensure that the mix will provide con-
crete with a compressive strength in excess of that specified for 28 days.
Concrete with a compressive strength in excess of 8,000 psi has not been commonly
specified for precast, prestressed concrete bridge beams. There is, however, a trend
toward the greater utilization of higher strength concretes to achieve more durable
and economical structures. Some states are using the higher strength characteristics
of high performance concrete to stretch spans or widen beam spacings by using
beams with concrete strengths in excess of 10,000 psi. In such cases, strength is typ-
ically specified at 56 days because of the strength gain that is possible in higher
strength concretes between 28 and 56 days.
The minimum compressive strength, in some cases, may be controlled by the need
to meet a minimum requirement for special exposure conditions as discussed in
Section 2.4.6.2.
Durability is a concern when bridges are exposed to aggressive environments. This
generally occurs where deicing salts are utilized on highways during winter or in
coastal regions where structures are exposed to salt from sea water. The Engineer
must be concerned about the deleterious effects of freezing and thawing, chemical
attack and corrosion of embedded or exposed metals. The ideal approach is to make
the concrete as impermeable as possible. In this respect, precast, prestressed concrete
has inherent advantages over cast-in-place concrete since it is produced in a con-
trolled environment that results in high quality concrete. In addition, the mix pro-
portions needed to achieve a relatively high strength concrete often produce a rela-
tively impermeable concrete. As a result, precast, prestressed concrete bridge beams
have an excellent record of performance in aggressive environments.
Freeze-thaw damage generally manifests
itself by scaling of the concrete surface.
This occurs as a result of temperature
fluctuations that cause freezing and
thawing when the concrete is saturated.
Freeze-thaw damage is magnified when
deicing chemicals are present. To mini-
mize freeze-thaw damage, a minimum
air content is generally specified. The
presence of entrained air provides space
for ice to expand without developing
high pressures that would otherwise dam-
age the concrete. Table 2.4.4.1-1, based
on ACI 211.1, provides the required air
f
ci
f
ci

MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.4.1 Concrete Strength at Release/2.4.4.1 FreezeThaw Damage
OCT 97
2.4.2
Concrete Strength
at Service Loads
2.4.3
High Performance
Concrete
2.4.4
Durability
2.4.4.1
FreezeThaw Damage
Minimum
Air Content*, percent
Nominal
Maximum
Aggregate
Size, in.
Severe
Exposure
Moderate
Exposure
3/8
1/2
3/4
1
1-1/2
7-1/2
7
6
6
5-1/2
6
5-1/2
5
4-1/2
4-1/2
Table 2.4.4.1-1
Total Air Content for
Frost-Resistant Concrete
*The usual tolerance on air content as delivered is 1.5 percent
content for severe and moderate exposure conditions for various maximum aggregate
sizes. Severe exposure is defined as a climate where the concrete may be in almost con-
tinuous contact with moisture prior to freezing, or where deicing salts come in con-
tact with the concrete. This includes bridge decks. Salt laden air, as found in coastal
areas, is also considered a severe exposure. A moderate exposure is one where deicing
salts are not used or where concrete will only occasionally be exposed to moisture prior
to freezing. This is generally the case for bridge beams. It should be noted that some
state highway departments specify air contents that are slightly different from those
shown in Table 2.4.4.1-1. In addition, many states do not require air entrainment in
prestressed concrete beams because beams are sheltered by the deck or other condi-
tions exist such that air entrainment is not required for good performance.
The ease of mixing, placing, consolidating and finishing freshly mixed concrete is
called workability. Concrete should be workable but should not segregate or bleed
excessively. Excessive bleeding increases the water-cementitious materials ratio near
the top surface and a weak top layer of concrete with poor durability may result. For
prestressed concrete bridge beams, particular attention should be paid to ensure that
concrete has adequate workability so that it will consolidate around the prestressing
strands, particularly at end regions of beams where a high percentage of nonpre-
stressed reinforcement is present. It is also important that concrete can be placed in
the webs of beams without segregation. Workability can be enhanced through the use
of water-reducing admixtures, high range water-reducing admixtures and air entrain-
ing agents. No standard test exists for the measurement of workability. The concrete
slump test is the most generally accepted method used to measure consistency of con-
crete but it should not be used as a means to control workability.
The water-cementitious materials ratio is the ratio of the amount of water, exclusive
of that absorbed by the aggregate, to the amount of cementitious materials in a con-
crete or mortar mixture. As such, the amount of water includes that within the
admixtures and that in the aggregate in excess of the saturated surface-dry condition.
The amount of cementitious material includes cement and other cementitious mate-
rials, such as fly ash and silica fume. The total cementitious materials content for
compressive strengths from 4,000 to 8,000 psi can vary from 600 to 1,000 pcy and
will also vary on a regional basis.
When strength, not durability, controls the mix design, the water-cementitious mate-
rials ratio and mixture proportions required to achieve specified strength should be
determined from field data or the results of trial batch strength tests. The trial batch-
es should be made from actual job materials. When no other data are available, Table
2.4.6.1-1, which is based on ACI 211.1, may be used as a starting point for mix de-
sign procedures for normal weight concrete.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.4.4.1 FreezeThaw Damage/2.4.6.1 Based on Strength
OCT 97
2.4.5
Workability
2.4.6
Water-Cementitious
Materials Ratio
2.4.6.1
Based on Strength
Water-Cementitious Materials Ratio
By Weight
Compressive
Strength at 28
days, psi
6,000
5,000
4,000
Non-Air-Entrained
Concrete
0.41
0.48
0.57
Air-Entrained
Concrete
0.40
0.48
Table 2.4.6.1-1
Approximate Ratios
for Trial Batches
When durability is a major consideration in the concrete mix design, the water-
cementitious materials ratios for various exposure conditions should be limited to the
values specified in ACI 318 and shown in Table 2.4.6.2-1. For precast, prestressed
concrete members exposed to deicing salts or spray from sea water, the maximum
ratio will generally be 0.40.
The unit weight of normal weight concrete is generally in the range of 140 to 150
pcf. For concrete with compressive strengths in excess of 10,000 psi, the unit weight
may be as high as 155 pcf. The unit weight will vary depending on the amount and
density of the aggregate and the air, water and cement contents. In the design of rein-
forced or prestressed concrete structures, the combination of normal weight concrete
and reinforcement is commonly assumed to weigh 150 pcf but may be assumed as
high as 160 pcf.
Lightweight concrete and sand-lightweight concrete (also called semi-lightweight
concrete) may also be utilized in precast, prestressed concrete bridge construction
with the use of suitable lightweight aggregates. Lightweight aggregate concretes gen-
erally have a unit weight of 90 to 105 pcf. Sand-lightweight aggregate concretes have
a unit weight of 105 to 130 pcf with a common range of 110 to 115 pcf. When light-
weight concrete is used in prestressed concrete members, special consideration must
be given to using mix design procedures for lightweight concrete as given in ACI
211.2.
Where suitable lightweight aggregates are available, a common practice is to blend
lightweight with normal weight aggregates to achieve a desired concrete unit weight.
This is done to control beam (or other product) weights to satisfy shipping limita-
tions, jobsite conditions such as crane size or reach limits, or plant or erection equip-
ment capacities.
Because of the need for early strength gain, Type III cement is often used in precast
concrete so that forms may be reused on a daily basis. This generally requires that the
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.4.6.2 Based on Durability/2.4.8 Effect of Heat Curing
OCT 97
2.4.7
Unit Weight
2.4.7.1
Normal Weight Concrete
2.4.7.2
Lightweight Concrete
2.4.7.3
Blended Aggregates
2.4.8
Effect of Heat Curing
Exposure Condition
Maximum Water-Cementitious Materials
Ratio for Normal Weight Concrete
Concrete intended to have low
permeability when exposed to water
0.50
Concrete exposed to freezing and thawing in a
moist condition or to deicing chemicals
0.45
For corrosion protection for reinforced
concrete exposed to chlorides from deicing
chemicals, salt, salt water or brackish
water, or spray from these sources
0.40
Table 2.4.6.2-1
Maximum Requirements for
Various Exposure Conditions
2.4.6.2
Based on Durability
release strength be achieved no later than 18 hours after the concrete is placed and
may be achieved at 12 hours or less. To accelerate the strength gain, it is often neces-
sary to raise the temperature of the concrete. In some situations, such as with high
strength concrete, the increase in temperature can be provided by the internal heat of
hydration. However, in most situations, it is necessary to utilize an external source of
heat, such as steam or radiant heat, to reach the necessary release strengths. The use
of external heat causes the concrete temperature to be higher at an earlier age than
would be achieved from the natural heat of hydration. A consequence of achieving a
high release strength is a reduction in the later age strengths compared to strengths
that would have been obtained if the concrete had not been heat cured. This is illus-
trated in Figure 2.4.8-1. The effect of heat curing on the concrete compressive
strength development must be taken into account in the selection of mix require-
ments and in the preparation of trial mixes.
Sample concrete mixes for six different concrete compressive strengths are shown in
Table 2.4.9-1. These are concrete mixes from different precasting plants. It should
not be assumed that these mixture proportions will always produce the same concrete
compressive strengths when used with different materials.
Concrete properties such as modulus of elasticity, tensile strength, shear strength and
bond strength are frequently expressed in terms of the compressive strength. Generally,
expressions for these quantities have been empirically established based on data for
concretes having compressive strengths up to 6,000 psi. With recent research, these
empirical relationships have been reevaluated for concrete compressive strengths up
to 10,000 psi. Unless indicated otherwise, the relationships in this section may be
assumed applicable for concrete with compressive strengths up to 10,000 psi. Where
alternative expressions are available, they are discussed in each section. For concretes
with compressive strengths in excess of 10,000 psi, the recommendations given in
ACI 363 and Zia et al (1991) should be considered.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.4.8 Effect of Heat Curing/2.5.1 Introduction
OCT 97
2.4.9
Sample Mixes
2.5
CONCRETE PROPERTIES
2.5.1
Introduction
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Age, days
Compressive
Strength, psi
moist cured
heat cured
Figure 2.4.8-1
Effect of Curing on Concrete
Compressive Strength Gain
Compressive strength is generally measured by testing 6x12-in. cylinders in accor-
dance with standard AASHTO or ASTM procedures. The precast concrete industry
also uses 4x8-in. cylinders. Some state highway departments permit the use of either
6x12-in. or 4x8-in. cylinders for quality control. For high strength concretes, the use
of smaller size cylinders may be necessary because of limitations on testing machine
capacities. For precast, prestressed concrete members it is particularly important that
the concrete cylinders used to determine release strengths be cured in an identical
manner to the bridge members. In general, this is accomplished by curing the con-
crete cylinders alongside the prestressed concrete member until release of the pre-
stressing strands. A more advanced technique of match curing is also available. In this
procedure, the cylinders are enclosed in a container in which the temperature is con-
trolled to match the temperature of the concrete member. The test cylinders then
undergo the same time-temperature history as the concrete member.
The variation of concrete compressive strength with time may be approximated by
the following general calculation:
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.5.2 Compressive Strength/2.5.2.1 Variation with Time
OCT 97
Table 2.4.9-1
Sample Production Concrete
Mixes
Mix A B C D E F
Specified Strength, psi
Release 3,500 4,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 8,800
28 Days 5,000 6,000 7,500 7,500 10,000 13,100
Quantities per cu yd
Cement, lb 705 705 850 750 750 671
Fly Ash, lb 0 0 0 140 0 316
Silica Fume, lb 0 0 0 0 95 0
Sand, lb 1,055 1,085 935 1,085 1,030 1,029
Coarse Aggregate, lb 1,790 1,920 1,770 1,980 1,870 1,918
Water, lb 270 285 300 230 230 247
Air Entrainment, fl. oz. 5 0 17 0 3 0
Water-Reducer, fl. oz. 25 53 29 0 10 0
High Range Water-Reducer, fl. oz. 125 0 145 160 85 200
Concrete Properties
Water-Cementitious Ratio 0.38 0.40 0.36 0.26 0.31 0.25
Slump, in. 3-1/2 4-3/4 4 6 5 9
Unit Weight, pcf 141.5 147.8 140.0 145.0 147.4
Air Content, % 6.0 6.0
Release Strength, psi 3,800 4,350 5,300 6,700 9,070 8,800
28-day Strength, psi 5,700 6,395 8,000 9,400 10,450 13,900
56-day Strength, psi UNKN UNKN
N/A N/A N/A 5.0
UNKN UNKN UNKN
UNKN
15,200
2.5.2
Compressive Strength
2.5.2.1
Variation with Time
UNKN Unknown; NA Not Applicable
(f
c
)
t
= (f
c
)
28
(Eq. 2.5.2.1-1)
where:
(f
c
)
t
= concrete compressive strength at an age of t days
(f
c
)
28
= concrete compressive strength at an age of 28 days
A and B = constants
The constants A and B are functions of both the type of cementitious material used and
the type of curing employed. The use of normal weight, sand-lightweight or all light-
weight aggregate does not appear to affect these constants significantly. Typical values
recommended by ACI 209 are given in Table 2.5.2-1. The constants for current prac-
tice shown in Table 2.5.2.1-1 are based on the sample mixes shown in Table 2.4.9-1.
These mixes have release strengths that vary from 63 to 87% of the 28-day strength.
As shown in Figure 2.4.8-1, a concrete that is heat cured will have higher initial
strengths but lower strength at later ages when compared to the same concrete that is
moist cured. It should be emphasized that these are general relationships and varia-
tions will occur for different concretes and curing procedures. When fly ash is used
as a mineral admixture, it may be appropriate to determine the compressive strength
at 56 days to take advantage of the later strength gain. Therefore, it is important that
the strength gain relationship be established through trial mixes or previous experi-
ence using local producer data. This is particularly important for release strengths
which can occur as early as 12 hours. If the relationship is unknown, the values list-
ed in Table 2.5.2-1 for current practice will give an approximate relationship.
The modulus of elasticity is the ratio of uniaxial normal stress to corresponding strain
up to the proportional limit for both tensile and compressive stresses. It is the mate-
rial property that determines the amount of deformation under load. It is used to cal-
culate camber at release, elastic deflections caused by dead and live loads, axial short-
ening and elongation, prestress losses, buckling and relative distribution of applied
forces in composite and non-homogeneous structural members. Modulus of elastici-
ty is determined in accordance with ASTM C 469.
For concrete compressive strengths less than 8,000 psi, the following calculation may
be used to predict the modulus of elasticity:
(E
c
)
t
= (Eq. 2.5.3.1-1)
where:
(E
c
)
t
= modulus of elasticity of concrete at an age of t days, psi
w
c
= unit weight of concrete, psi
33(w ) f
c
1.5
c t
( )
t
A+Bt
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.5.2.1 Variation with Time/2.5.3.1 Calculations (E
c
)
OCT 97
2.5.2.2
Effect of Accelerated Curing
2.5.3
Modulus of Elasticity
2.5.3.1
Calculations (E
c
)
Source Curing Cement A B
ACI 209 Moist I 4.00 0.85
ACI 209 Moist III 2.30 0.92
ACI 209 Steam I 1.00 0.95
ACI 209 Steam III 0.70 0.98
Current Practice Heat III 0.28 0.99
Table 2.5.2.1-1
Values of
Constants A and B
(f
c
)
t
= concrete compressive strength at an age of t days, psi
The above equation was based on an analysis for concrete strengths up to about
6,000 psi. According to ACI 363, the above calculation tends to over-estimate the
modulus of elasticity for higher strength concretes. Several alternative equations have
been proposed for the calculation of modulus of elasticity and the following by
Martinez (1982) has received general acceptance:
Deviations from predicted values are highly dependent on the properties and pro-
portions of the coarse aggregate used in the concrete. Consequently, where local pro-
ducer data are available, they should be utilized in place of the values determined
from these standard equations. This is particularly important in computing the cam-
ber at release as these modulus of elasticity equations have not been developed specif-
ically for determination of the modulus of heat cured concrete at an early age.
The modulus of rupture is a measure of the flexural tensile strength of the concrete.
It can be determined by testing, but the modulus of rupture for structural design is
generally assumed to be a function of the concrete compressive strength as given by:
(Eq. 2.5.4-1)
where:
f
r
= modulus of rupture, psi
K = a constant, usually taken as 7.5
= 1.0 for normal weight concrete
0.85 for sand-lightweight concrete
0.75 for all-lightweight concrete
For high strength concretes, a value of K greater than 7.5 has been proposed.
However, for most applications, a conservative value of 7.5 is still used for high
strength concretes.
Durability refers to the ability of concrete to resist deterioration from the environ-
ment or service conditions in which it is placed. Properly designed concrete should
survive throughout its service life without significant distress. The following test pro-
cedures may be used to check the durability of concrete made with a specific mix:
Freeze-thaw resistance ASTM C 666, C 671 and C 682
Deicer scaling resistance ASTM C 672
Abrasion resistance ASTM C 418, C 779 and C 944
Chloride permeability AASHTO T277 or T259
Alkali-aggregate reactivity ASTM C 227, C 289, C 342, C 441 and C 586
Sulphate resistance ASTM C 452 and C 1012
It is not necessary to perform all the above tests to prove that a concrete will be durable.
In general, a concrete that has a low permeability will also have a high resistance to freeze-
thaw cycles and surface scaling. It should also be noted that a concrete that does not per-
form very well in the above tests will not necessarily perform poorly in the field.
Concrete that performs well in the above tests, will nearly always perform well in an actu-
al structure. This is the case for precast concrete members that are produced under con-
trolled factory conditions.
f K f
r c
=
( ) , , ,
.
E f
w
145
c t c t
c
=
( )
+
( )
40 000 1 000 000

1 5
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.5.3.1 Calculations (E
c
)/2.5.5 Durability
OCT 97
2.5.5
Durability
2.5.3.2
Variations (E
c
)
2.5.4
Modulus of Rupture
Heat of hydration is the heat generated when cement and water react. The amount
of heat generated is largely dependent on the chemical composition of the cement
but an increase in cement content, fineness or curing temperature will increase the
heat of hydration. Heat of hydration is particularly important in heat-cured concretes
where the heat generated by the chemical reaction of the cement in conjunction with
heat curing can be used to accelerate the development of compressive strength. The
heat of hydration can be measured using ASTM C 186. When prestressed concrete
beams are heat cured, the heat generated by hydration cannot escape from the sur-
face of the member. Consequently, under this condition, the beams may be consid-
ered as mass concrete. Procedures for determining the temperature rise in mass con-
crete are described in ACI 207.1. However, as an approximate calculation, it can be
assumed that a temperature rise of 10F will occur for each 100 lb of cement used in
the concrete. More precise calculations can be made using the actual concrete mix
proportions, specific heat of the concrete and heat generated per unit mass of cement.
Precast concrete members are subjected to air drying as soon as they are removed from
the forms. During this exposure to the atmosphere, the concrete slowly loses some of its
original water, causing shrinkage to occur. The amount and rate of shrinkage vary with
the relative humidity, size of member and amount of nonprestressed reinforcement.
Procedures to calculate the amount of shrinkage and creep have been published in
the LRFD Specifications, by CEB-FIP (1990) and ACI 209. These procedures are
based on the recommendations of ACI 209 which are summarized in this section.
Shrinkage after 1 to 3 days for steam-cured concrete:
Shrinkage after 7 days for moist-cured concrete:
where:
S(t, t
0
) = shrinkage strain at a concrete age of t days
S
u
= ultimate shrinkage strain
t = age of concrete, days
t
0
= age of concrete at the end of the initial curing period, days
Although Eq. 2.5.7.1-1 was developed for steam-cured concretes, it may be applied
to radiant heat-cured concretes if more specific information is not available.
In the absence of specific shrinkage data for local aggregates and conditions, the fol-
lowing average value for the ultimate shrinkage strain is suggested:
where:
k
sh
= product of applicable correction factors
= k
cp
x k
h
x k
s
k
cp
= correction factor for curing period
k
h
k
s
(Eq. 2.5.7.1-3a)
(Eq. 2.5.7.1-3)
S k x 10
u sh
- 6
= 545
(Eq. 2.5.7.1-2)
S(t,t
(t - 7
35+(t - 7
S
0 u
)
)
)
=
(Eq. 2.5.7.1-1)
S(t,t
(t - t
55+(t - t
S
0
0
0
u
)
)
)
=
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.5.6 Heat of Hydration/2.5.7.1 Calculation of Shrinkage
OCT 97
2.5.7
Shrinkage
2.5.7.1
Calculation of Shrinkage
2.5.6
Heat of Hydration
For shrinkage of concrete
moist-cured for other than 7
days, the curing correction
factor, k
cp
may be taken
from Table 2.5.7.1-1.
The relative humidity cor-
rection factor, k
h
, may be
taken from Table 2.5.7.1-2.
A relative humidity map
taken from LRFD Specifica-
tions is shown in Figure
2.5.7.1-1.
The above correction factors are based on the following equations:
Shrinkage: k
h
= 2.00 0.0143H for 40 H 80 (Eq. 2.5.7.1-3b)
= 4.286 0.0429H for 80 < H 100 (Eq. 2.5.7.1-3c)
Creep: k
h
= 1.586 0.0084H for 40 H 100 (Eq. 2.5.7.1-3d)
where H = annual average ambient relative humidity in percent
The size correction factor, k
s
, depends on the volume to surface area of the
member and may be taken from Table 2.5.7.1-3. The volume to surface area
ratio for long members may be computed as the ratio of cross-sectional area to
section perimeter.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
MAY 00
Moist Curing
Period, days
Shrinkage Factor,
k
cp
1 1.20
3 1.10
7 1.00
14 0.93
28 0.86
60 0.79
90 0.75
Table 2.5.7.1-1
Correction Factor k
cp
for Initial Curing Period
Table 2.5.7.1-2
Correction Factors k
h
for Relative Humidity
Average Ambient Relative
Humidity, %
Shrinkage
Creep
40 1.43 1.25
50 1.29 1.17
60 1.14 1.08
70 1.00 1.00
80 0.86 0.91
90 0.43 0.83
100 0.00 0.75
Factor, k
h
Factor, k
h
The above correction factors are based on the following equations:
Shrinkage: k
s
= 1.2e
0.12V/S
(Eq. 2.5.7.1-3e)
Creep: k
s
= 2/3 (1+1.13e
0.54V/S
) (Eq. 2.5.7.1-3f )
where:
V = volume of concrete, in.
3
S = surface area of concrete exposed to drying, in.
2
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
MAY 00
Figure 2.5.7.1-1
Average Annual Ambient
Relative Humidity
Table 2.5.7.1-3
s
for Size
Section
Volume/Surface (in.)
Shrinkage Creep
Type I 3.05 0.83 0.81
Type II 3.37 0.80 0.79
Type III 4.06 0.74 0.75
Type IV 4.74 0.68 0.73
Type V 4.44 0.71 0.74
Type VI 4.41 0.71 0.74
BT-54 3.01 0.84 0.82
BT-63 3.01 0.84 0.82
BT-72 3.01 0.84 0.82
Factor, k
s
Factor, k
s
Beam
Prestressed concrete beams are subjected to the effects of creep as soon as the pre-
stressing force is released in the plant. Creep of concrete results in time-dependent
changes in camber and prestress forces. The amount and rate of creep vary with the
concrete age at loading, stress level, relative humidity, size of member and amount of
nonprestressed reinforcement. The following calculations are based on ACI 209.
Creep strains are determined by multiplying the elastic strains by a creep coefficient,
C(t, t
0
).
For steam-cured concrete loaded at 1 to 3 days and moist-cured concrete loaded at
7 days:
where: C
u
= ultimate creep coefficient.
Although Eq. 2.5.8.1-1 was developed for steam-cured and moist-cured concretes, it may
be applied to radiant heat-cured concretes if more specific information is not available.
In the absence of creep data for local aggregates and materials, the following average
value is suggested :
where:
k
c
= product of applicable correction factors
= k
la
x k
h
x k
s
k
la
= correction factor for loading age
k
h
k
s
For loading ages later than 7 days for moist-cured concrete and 1 to 3 days for steam-
cured concrete, the loading age correction factor, k
la
, may be taken from Table 2.5.8.1-1.
Correction factors are based on the following equations:
For steam-cured concrete: k
la
= 1.13(t
la
)
0.094
(Eq. 2.5.8.1-2b)
For moist-cured concrete: k
la
= 1.25(t
la
)
0.118
(Eq. 2.5.8.1-2c)
where: t
la
= loading age, days
The relative humidity correction factor, k
h
, may be taken from
Table 2.5.7.1-2. A relative humidity map taken from the LRFD
Specifications is shown in Figure 2.5.7.1-1.
The size correction factor, k
s
, depends on the volume to surface
area of the member and may be taken from Table 2.5.7.1-3.
(Eq. 2.5.8.1-2a)
(Eq. 2.5.8.1-2) C k
u c
= 1 88 .
(Eq. 2.5.8.1-1)
C(t,t
(t t
1 (t t
C
0 u
)
)
)
.
.
=

+
0
0 6
0
0 6
0
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.5.8 Creep/2.5.8.1 Calculation of Creep
OCT 97
2.5.8
Creep
2.5.8.1
Calculation of Creep
Loading Age, days
7 0.94 1.00
10 0.90 0.95
14 0.88 0.92
28 0.83 0.84
60 0.76 0.77
90 0.74 0.74
Steam Cured, Moist Cured,
Factor k
la
Factor k
la
Table 2.5.8.1-1
la
for Loading Age
The coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete varies with the aggregate type as
shown in Table 2.5.9-1, which is based on ACI 209. The range for normal weight
concrete is generally 5 to 7 x 10
-6
per F when made with siliceous aggregates and 3.5
to 5 x 10
- 6
per F when made with calcareous aggregates. The range for structural
lightweight concrete is 3.6 to 6.0 x
10
-6
per F depending on the type
of aggregate and the amount of nat-
ural sand. For design, coefficients of
6 x 10
-6
per F for normal weight
concrete and 5 x 10
-6
per F for
sand-lightweight concrete are fre-
quently used. If greater accuracy is
needed, tests should be made on the
specific concrete. Since the coeffi-
cient of thermal expansion for steel
is also about 6 x 10
-6
per F, the
thermal effects on precast, pre-
stressed concrete members are eval-
uated by treating them as plain con-
crete and utilizing the coefficient of
thermal expansion for concrete.
When precast, prestressed concrete members are placed adjacent to each other, load
transfer between adjacent members is often achieved through a grouted keyway. The
keyway may or may not extend for the full depth of the member. The keyway is
grouted with one of several different grouting materials which are described in this
section. In some bridges, no additional deck work is performed after grouting. In
other bridges, a composite concrete deck may be cast on the members or the top sur-
face of the members may be coated with a waterproofing membrane and overlaid
with an asphaltic wearing course.
ASTM Specification C 1107 covers three grades of packaged dry hydraulic-cement
grouts (non-shrink) intended for use under applied load. These grouts are composed
of hydraulic cement, fine aggregate and other ingredients and generally only require
the addition of mixing water for use. Three grades of grout are classified according to
the volume control mechanism exhibited by the grout after being mixed with water:
Grade A pre-hardening volume-adjusting in which expansion occurs before harden-
ing
Grade B post-hardening volume-adjusting in which expansion occurs after the
grout hardens
Grade C combination volume-adjusting which utilizes a combination of expansion
before and after hardening
Performance requirements for compressive strengths and maximum and minimum
expansion levels are given in ASTM C 1107. Although these grouts are termed non-
shrink, the intent is to provide a final length that is not shorter than the original
length at placement. This is achieved through an expansion mechanism prior to any
shrinkage occurring.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.5.9 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion/2.6.2.1 Performance Requirements
OCT 97
2.5.9
Coefficient of Thermal
Expansion
2.6
GROUT MATERIALS
2.6.1
Definitions and
Applications
2.6.2
Types and
Characteristics
of Grout
2.6.2.1
Performance Requirements
Rock Type millionths/
o
F
Chert 6.6
Quartzite 5.7
Quartz 6.2
Sandstone 5.2
Marble 4.6
Siliceous Limestone 4.6
Granite 3.8
Dolerite 3.8
Basalt 3.6
Limestone 3.1
Table 2.5.9-1
Coefficients of Thermal
Expansion of Concrete
Different cementitious materials may be used to produce grout. These include port-
land cement, shrinkage-compensating cement, expansive portland cement made with
special additives, epoxy-cement resins and magnesium ammonium phosphate
cement (Gulyas et al 1995).
The properties of grout are determined using the following ASTM test methods:
C 109 Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars
(Using 2-in. or 50-mm Cube Specimens)
C 138 Test Method for Unit Weight, Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric)
of Concrete
C 157 Test Method for Length Change for Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar
and Concrete
C 185 Test Method for Air Content of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
C 827 Test Method for Change in Height at Early Ages of Cylindrical Specimens
from Cementitious Mixtures
C 1090 Test Method for Measuring Changes in Height of Cylindrical Specimens
from Hydraulic-Cement Grout
The same materials that are used for grouting keyways between precast concrete
members may be used for grout beds to support structural and non-structural mem-
bers. In some cases, the grout will be very stiff and is referred to as dry pack. Dry pack
will often have a very high compressive strength because of the low water-cementi-
tious materials ratio. It is often compacted by hand tamping.
Epoxy-resin grouts can be used between precast concrete members where increased
bonding and tensile capacity is required. When these are used, consideration should
be given to the higher coefficient of thermal expansion and the larger creep proper-
ties of epoxy grouts.
When concrete overlays are placed on precast concrete members, a 1/16- to 1/8-in.
thick layer of grout consisting of one part cement, one part sand and enough water
to make a thick, creamy, paint-like consistency is brushed onto the concrete surface.
The grout is placed a short distance ahead of the overlay concrete. The grout should
not be allowed to dry prior to the overlay placement. Otherwise, the dry grout may
act as a poor surface for bonding. It is particularly important that the concrete sur-
face be clean and sound and that the grout be well brushed into the concrete surface.
Grouting of post-tensioned members is described in the PTI Post-Tensioning Manual
(1990).
Although prestressed concrete may be produced with strands, wires or bars, pre-
stressed precast concrete bridge members are generally produced using seven-wire
strand conforming to ASTM A 416 (AASHTO M203). Seven-wire strand consists of
a straight center wire that is wrapped by six wires in a helical pattern. Strand sizes
range from 3/8-in. to 0.6-in. diameter, as shown in Table 2.11.1. The larger size
strands are used in prestressed concrete beams because this results in fewer strands.
The use of 0.6-in. diameter strand is essential to take full advantage of high strength
concrete.
Two types of strands are covered in ASTM A 416: low-relaxation and stress-
relieved (normal-relaxation). However, in recent years, the use of low-relaxation
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.6.2.2 Materials/2.7.1 Strand Types
OCT 97
2.6.4
Grout Bed Materials
2.6.5
Epoxy Resins
2.6.6
Overlays
2.6.7
PostTensioned Members
2.7
PRESTRESSING
STRAND
2.7.1
Strand Types
2.6.2.2
Materials
2.6.3
ASTM Tests
strand has progressively increased to a point that normal-relaxation strand is seldom
used. Two grades of strand are generally used in prestressed concrete construction.
These are Grades 250 and 270, which have minimum ultimate strengths of 250,000
and 270,000 psi, respectively. In general, Grade 270 is used in prestressed concrete
bridge beams. Grade 250 strand may be used where lower levels of precompression
are required. In addition to smooth, uncoated strands, epoxy-coated strands are avail-
able.
Epoxy-coated strand is seven-wire prestressing strand with an organic epoxy coating
which can vary in thickness from 25 to 45 mils. Two types of coatings are available.
A smooth type has low bond characteristics and is intended for use in unbonded,
post-tensioned systems, external post-tensioned systems, and stay cables. An epoxy-
coated strand with particles of grit embedded in the surface is used in bonded pre-
tensioned and post-tensioned systems.
In addition to the strand having an external coating, it can also be manufactured with
the interstices between the individual wires filled with epoxy. This prevents the entry
of corrosive chemicals, either by capillary action, or other hydrostatic forces. This
type of strand should be specified when there is risk of contaminants or moisture
entering at the ends of tendons. Epoxy-coated strand should comply with ASTM A
882. This specification requires that all prestressing steel strand to be coated shall
meet the requirements of ASTM A 416.
For pretensioned applications with epoxy-coated strands where accelerated curing
techniques are employed, the temperature of the concrete surrounding the strand at
the time of prestress transfer should be limited to a maximum of 150 F and the con-
crete temperature should be falling. The epoxy-coating will not be damaged if this
recommended temperature is not exceeded during the curing cycle. Concrete tem-
peratures under sustained fire exposure conditions will most likely be considerably
higher than the epoxy can withstand. This could result in a complete loss of bond
between the strand and the concrete. Although bridge structures may not require a
specific fire resistance rating, the likelihood of vehicle fires and subsequent effects of
elevated temperatures should be evaluated. More specific information on the use of
epoxy-coated strand is given in the report by the PCI Committee on Epoxy-Coated
Strand (1993).
Cross-sectional properties, design strengths and idealized stress-strain curves of Grade
250 and 270 low-relaxation seven-wire strands are given in Section 2.11. Also, see
Chapter 8, Section 8.2.2.5.
Relaxation is the time-dependent reduction of stress in a prestressing tendon. When
a strand is stressed and held at a constant length, the stress in the strand decreases
with time, as illustrated in Figure 2.7.3-1. Relaxation losses increase with stress level
and temperature. The relaxation losses of low-relaxation strand are considerably less
than the losses in normal-relaxation strand. Relaxation of a prestressing strand
depends on the stress level in the strand. However, because of other prestress losses,
there is a continuous reduction of the strand stress, which causes a reduction in relax-
ation. Therefore, several complex and empirical relationships have been proposed for
the determination of relaxation losses. Several of these methods are based on the loss
that would occur if the strand were under constant strain. This loss is then reduced
by the effects of elastic shortening, creep and shrinkage. Early research work on relax-
ation was performed by Magura (1964). Subsequently, many other design recom-
mendations have been made. The most recent recommendation is in the LRFD
Specifications.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.7.1 Strand Types/2.7.3 Relaxation
OCT 97
2.7.1.1.1
Effect of Heat
2.7.2
Material Properties
2.7.3
Relaxation
2.7.1.1
Epoxy-Coated Strand
Tests of epoxy-coated, low-relaxation strands have shown the relaxation to be signif-
icantly higher than that of uncoated strand. The use of relaxation losses equal to dou-
ble the relaxation loss calculated for uncoated strand have been recommended by
manufacturers. Individual manufacturers of epoxy-coated strand should be consult-
ed for suitable relaxation loss values.
If the precompression in a prestressed concrete member is sufficient to ensure an
uncracked section at service loads, the stress range in the strands is not likely to be
high enough for fatigue of the strand to be a critical design factor. Fatigue consider-
ations have not been a major factor in the specification of prestressing strand for
bridges because bridge beams are designed to be uncracked. The actual and allowable
fatigue life of prestressing strand depend on the stress range and the minimum stress
level. The stress range may be affected by the strand radius of curvature, particularly
in harped strand.
The following design provisions for fatigue were introduced in the LRFD Specifications:
The stress range in prestressing tendons shall not exceed:
18,000 psi for radii of curvature in excess of 30 ft and
10,000 psi for radii of curvature not exceeding 12 ft
A linear interpolation may be used for radii between 12 and 30 ft
In a pretensioned member, the prestressing force in a strand is transferred from the
strand to the concrete by bond. Strand surface condition has long been recognized as
a primary factor affecting bonding of concrete to prestressing strand. An increase in
the surface roughness, such as a light surface rust, increases the bond between the
concrete and the strand and results in a shorter development length. However,
researchers have found it difficult to consistently quantify the effects of surface char-
acteristics (Buckner 1994). This means that the increase in bond strength can possi-
bly provide an extra margin of safety, but is not always consistent and should not be
counted on to provide a shorter development length unless tests are conducted with
specific strand. Chemicals on the strand surface can result in a reduction in bond
between the concrete and strand and longer development lengths. Consequently PCI
recommends that Prestressing strand shall conform to the requirements of ASTM A
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.7.3.1 EpoxyCoated Strand/2.7.5 Surface Condition
OCT 97
2.7.4
Fatigue Strength
2.7.4.1
Stress Range
2.7.5
Surface Condition
2.7.3.1
EpoxyCoated Strand
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
0
Time, days
Strand Stress,
ksi
Low-Relaxation Strand
Stress-Relieved Strand
(Normal-Relaxation)
10 20 30 40 50
Figure 2.7.3-1
Comparison of
Relaxation Losses
416 and shall be certified by its manufacturer to bond to concrete of a normal
strength and consistency in conformance with the prediction equations for transfer
and development lengths given in both ACI and AASHTO specifications.
Lengths of prestressing strand can be connected using specialized strand connectors.
Generally, this is not necessary in precast, prestressed concrete bridges. In situations
where splicing of strands is necessary, consult the specific manufacturers literature for
details. The use of splice chucks in plant production is described in Chapter 3.
Nonprestressed reinforcement generally consists of deformed bars or welded wire
reinforcement (previously refered to as welded wire fabric). Material properties and
sizes of nonprestressed reinforcement are given in Tables 2.11-2 through 2.11-4 and
Figure 2.11-1.
Reinforcing bars should be deformed except plain bars may be used for spirals or for
dowels at expansion or contraction joints. Reinforcing bars are generally specified to
have yield strengths of 40,000 or 60,000 psi (Grade 40 or Grade 60 respectively). In
some situations, a yield strength of 75,000 psi (Grade 70) may be specified, although
this would be unusual in bridges.
Reinforcing bars should conform to one of the following ASTM specifications:
A 615 Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 616 Specification for Rail-Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 617 Specification for Axle-Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 706 Specification for Low-Alloy Deformed Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
A 767 Specification for Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Steel Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 775 Specification for Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel Bars
The most widely used type and grade of bars conform to ASTM A 615 Grade 60 and
include bars with sizes from No. 3 through No. 11, No. 14 and No. 18. When weld-
ing is required or when more bendability and controlled ductility are required, as in
seismic-resistant design, low-alloy reinforcing bars conforming to ASTM A 706 should
be considered.
When coated reinforcing bars are required as a corrosion protection system, the bars
may be either zinc-coated or epoxy-coated and conform to ASTM A 767 or ASTM
D 3963 (AASHTO M284), respectively. Epoxy-coated reinforcing bars are generally
used in bridge decks exposed to a salt environment.
The most common method for splicing reinforcing bars is the lap splice. However,
when lap splices are undesirable or impractical, mechanical or welded connections
may be used to splice reinforcing bars. In general, a mechanical connection should
develop, in tension or compression, at least 125% of the specified yield strength of
the bars being connected. This is to ensure that yielding of the bars will occur before
failure in the mechanical connection.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.7.5 Surface Condition/2.8.2 Mechanical Splices
OCT 97
2.7.6
Splicing
2.8
NONPRESTRESSED
REINFORCEMENT
2.8.1
Deformed Bars
2.8.1.1
Specifications
2.8.1.2
Corrosion Protection
2.8.2
Mechanical Splices
Mechanical connections can be categorized as compression-only, tension-only and
tension-compression. In most compression-only mechanical connections, the com-
pressive stress is transferred by concentric bearing from one bar to the other. The
mechanical connection then serves to hold the bars in concentric contact. Various
types of mechanical connections are available that will handle both tension and com-
pression forces. These connectors use a variety of couplers that may be cold swaged,
cold extruded, hot forged, grout filled, steel filled or threaded. Tension-only mechan-
ical connections generally use a steel coupling sleeve with a wedge. This is only effec-
tive when the reinforcing bar is pulled in tension. Most mechanical connection
devices are proprietary and further information is available from individual manu-
facturers. Descriptions of the physical features and installation procedures for select-
ed mechanical splices are described in ACI 439.3R.
Welded wire reinforcement (WWR) is a prefabricated reinforcement consisting of
cold-drawn wires welded together in square or rectangular grids. Each wire intersec-
tion is electrically resistance-welded by a continuous automatic welder. Pressure and
heat fuse the intersecting wires into a homogeneous section and fix all wires in their
proper position. WWR may consist of plain wires, deformed wires or a combination
of both. WWR can also be galvanized or epoxy coated. WWR conforms to one of
the following ASTM standard specifications:
A 185 Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Plain, for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 497 Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Deformed, for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 884 Specification for Epoxy-Coated Steel Wire and Welded Wire Fabric for
Reinforcement
Wire sizes are specified by a letter, W or D, followed by a number indicating the
cross-sectional area of the wire in hundredths of a square inch. Plain wire sizes use the
letter W; deformed wire sizes use the letter D. Wire sizes from W1.4 to W45 and D2
to D45 may be specified. Wire spacings generally vary from 2 to 12 in. Common
stock styles and wire sizes are listed in Table 2.11-3. The Engineer should check on
availability of styles before specifying because all sizes may not be locally available.
The Standard Specifications limits the allowable stress range in straight reinforcement
caused by live load plus impact at service load to:
f
f
= 21 0.33f
min
+ 8(r/h) (Eq. 2.8.4-1)
where:
f
f
= stress range between maximum tensile stress and minimum stress
f
min
= minimum stress level, tensile stress is positive, compressive stress is negative
r/h = ratio of base radius to height of rolled-on transverse deformation, taken as
0.3 when actual values are not known.
Post-tensioning systems may be conveniently divided into three categories depending
on whether the stressing tendon is wire, strand or bar. For bridge construction, wire
systems are generally not used. Further information on post-tensioning systems has
been published by the Post-Tensioning Institute (1990). For details of proprietary
systems, the manufacturers literature should be consulted.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.8.2.1 Types/2.9 PostTensioning Materials
OCT 97
2.8.2.1
Types
2.8.3
Welded Wire
Reinforcement
2.8.4
Fatigue Strength
2.9
POSTTENSIONING
MATERIALS
Strand systems utilize the same strand and strand types that are used for preten-
sioned concrete members. In post-tensioning systems, the strands are generally com-
bined to form a complete tendon and may consist of any quantity from a single
strand to 55 strands. Anchorages for strand systems utilize the wedge principle in
which the individual strands are anchored with wedges into a single tendon anchor-
age. In a post-tensioned multi-strand system, all strands are tensionsed at the same
time. Strand tendons may be tensionsed in the plant, on the construction site, or in
the finished structure.
Bar systems generally utilize a single bar in a post-tensioning duct. The surface of the
bar may be smooth with rolled threads of the required length at both ends, or the
thread deformation may be rolled-on over the entire length of the bar during manufac-
turing. This permits the bar to be cut at any point and threaded fittings added. The
bars are anchored using a threaded nut. Different types of anchorages are used at the
tensioning and dead end anchorages. Bars for use in post-tensioning systems should
conform with ASTM A 722 This specification covers both plain and deformed bars.
Various proprietary systems are available for splicing both strand and bar systems.
Couplers are required to develop at least 95% of the minimum specified ultimate
strength of the tendon without exceeding the specified anchorage set (Post-
Tensioning Institute, 1990).
Ducts for post-tensioning systems may be either rigid or semi-rigid and made of fer-
rous metal or polyethylene. They may also be formed in the concrete with removable
cores. The use of polyethylene ducts is generally recommended for corrosive envi-
ronments. Polyethylene ducts should not be used on radii less than 30 ft because of
the polyethylenes lack of resistance to abrasion during pulling and tensioning the
tendons. The inside diameter of ducts should be at least 1/4 in. larger than the nom-
inal diameter of single bar or strand tendons. For multiple bar or strand tendons, the
inside cross-sectional area of the duct should be at least twice the net area of the pre-
stressing steel. Where tendons are to be placed by the pull-through method, the duct
area should be at least 2.5 times the net area of the prestressing steel.
A newly emerging technology, with potential application in prestressed concrete,
consists of prestressing bars and tendons made from fiber reinforced plastic (FRP)
composites. This class of material consists of a polymer matrix such as polyester, vinyl
ester, epoxy, or phenolic resin which is reinforced with fibers such as aramid, carbon
or glass. These composites have tensile strengths similar to conventional strand and
bar systems and are particularly suitable for applications where weight, durability,
corrosion resistance and resistance to electromagnetic currents are relevant. Details of
FRP composites are given in ACI 440.
The mechanical properties of FRP vary significantly from one product to another.
Factors such as type and volume of fiber and resin play a major role in establishing
the characteristics of the product. The mechanical properties of all composites are
affected by loading history, loading duration, temperature and moisture.
Furthermore, standardized tests for determination of the mechanical properties have
yet to be developed to the same extent that exists for steel products. Despite these
limitations, a comparison of properties with conventional steel strands and bars can
still be made.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.9.1 Strand Systems/2.10.2 Mechanical Properties
OCT 97
2.10.2
Mechanical Properties
2.9.1
Strand Systems
2.9.2
Bar Systems
2.9.3
Splicing
2.9.4
Ducts
2.10
FIBER REINFORCED
PLASTIC
REINFORCEMENT
2.10.1
Introduction
The tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, coefficient of thermal expansion and unit
weight for several types of FRP composites are given in Table 2.10.2.1-1, which is
based on ACI 440. Because an FRP bars and tendons are anisotropic, the mechani-
cal properties are those measured in the longitudinal or strong direction. Unlike steel,
the tensile strength of FRP bars is a function of bar diameter. Due to shear lag, the
fibers located near the center of the bar cross section, are not stressed as much as those
near the outer surface of the bar. This results in reduced strength in larger diameter
bars. FRP bars and tendons reach their ultimate tensile strength without exhibiting
any yielding of the material. Consequently, fiber reinforced plastic composite bars
and tendons do not possess the ductility of steel tendons. However, design methods
are being developed to ensure that members reinforced with FRP composites will
possess adequate ductility.
Fibers such as graphite and glass have excellent resistance to creep whereas the resins
exhibit high creep. The orientation and volume of fibers have a significant influence
on the creep and performance of the composites. Consequently, relaxation losses may
be much higher with FRP composite bars and tendons. FRP bars and tendons exhib-
it good fatigue resistance.
Despite the above limitations, composite materials have already been used in a vari-
ety of civil engineering applications in the field on a limited basis. Further details of
these applications are given in ACI 440.
According to ACI 440, nine companies have marketed FRP composites as concrete
reinforcement in North America. At the present time, there is a rapid evolution and
considerable research underway on fiber reinforced plastics. Consequently, the reader
should verify current products and their availability with individual manufacturers.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.10.2.1 ShortTerm/2.10.4 Products
OCT 97
2.10.2.1
ShortTerm
2.10.2.2
LongTerm
2.10.3
Applications
2.10.4
Products
Property Steel Strand
Glass Fiber
Tendon
Carbon Fiber
Tendon
Tensile Strength (ksi) 270 75-175 200-250 240-350 170-300
Modulus of Elasticity (ksi) 29,000
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion
(millionth/ F)
6.5 5.5 5.5 0 -0.5
Unit Weight (pcf) 490 94-125 150 94-100 78
Glass Fiber Bar
Aramid Fiber
6,000-8,000 7,000-9,000 22,000-24,000 7,000-11,000
Tendon
Table 2.10.2.1-1
Comparison of Properties
of Steel Strand
and FRP Reinforcement
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.11 Reinforcement Sizes and Properties
Seven-Wire Low-Relaxation Strand Grade 270
Nominal Diameter (in.) 3/8 7/16 1/2 0.6
Nominal Area (A
*
s
, in.
2
)
0.085 0.115 0.153
Nominal Weight (plf ) 0.29 0.39 0.52 0.53 0.74
Minimum Tensile Strength (kip)
23.0 31.0 41.3 45.1 58.6
Minimum Yield Strength (kip) 20.7 27.9 37.2 40.6 52.7
0.70f
s
A
*
s
(kip)
16.1 21.7 28.9 31.6 41.0
0.75f
s
A
*
s
(kip)
17.2 23.3 31.0 33.8 44.0
0.80f
s
A
*
s
(kip)
18.4 24.8 33.0 36.1 46.9
Seven-Wire Low-Relaxation Strand Grade 250
Nominal Diameter (in.) 3/8 7/16 1/2 0.6
Nominal Area (A
*
s
, in.
2
)
0.080 0.108 0.144
Nominal Weight (plf ) 0.27 0.37 0.49 0.74
Minimum Tensile Strength

(kip) 20.0 27.0 36.0 54.0
Minimum Yield Strength (kip) 18.0 24.3 32.4 48.6
0.70f
s
A
*
s
(kip) 14.0 18.9 25.2 37.8
0.75f
s
A
*
s
(kip) 15.0 20.3 27.0 40.5
0.80f
s
A
*
s
(kip) 16.0 21.6 28.8 43.2
Deformed Prestressing Bars Grade 150
s
(f
= 150 ksi)
s
(f
= 250 ksi)
s
(f
= 270 ksi)
Nominal Diameter (in.) 5/8 1 1-1/4
Nominal Area (A
*
s
, in.
2
)
0.28 0.85 1.25 1.58
Nominal Weight (plf ) 0.98 3.01 4.39 5.56
Minimum Tensile Strength (kip)
42.0 127.5 187.5
Minimum Yield Strength (kip) 33.6 102.0 150.0
0.70f
s
A
*
s
(kip)
29.4 89.3 131.3
0.75f
s
A
*
s
(kip)
31.5 95.6 140.6
0.80f
s
A
*
s
(kip)
33.6 102.0 150.0
0.217
9/16
0.65
51.8
46.6
36.3
38.9
41.4
0.192 0.167
1/2 Special
0.216
1-3/8
237.0
189.6
165.9
177.8
189.6
2.11
REINFORCEMENT SIZES AND PROPERTIES
Table 2.11-1
Properties and Design Strengths
of Prestressing Steel
OCT 97
These curves can be approximated by the following equations:
250 ksi strand 270 ksi strand
For
ps
0.0076: f
ps
= 28,500
ps
(ksi) For
ps
0.0086: f
ps
= 28,500
ps
(ksi)
For
ps
> 0.0076: f
ps
= 250 0.04/(
ps
0.0064)(ksi) For
ps
> 0.0086: f
ps
= 270 0.04/(
ps
0.007)(ksi)
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
OCT 97
Figure 2.11-1
Idealized
Stress-Strain Curve
for Seven-Wire
Low-Relaxation
Prestressing Strand
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
0.000 0.010 0.015 0.005 0.020 0.025 0.030
Strain,
ps
Stress,
f
ps
, ksi
270 ksi
250 ksi
Table 2.11-2
Reinforcing Bar Sizes
ASTM Standard Reinforcing Bars
Bar Size Weight Nominal Dimensions
Designation No. (plf)
Diameter (in.) Area (in.
2
) Perimeter (in.)
3 0.376 0.375 0.11 1.178
4 0.668 0.500 0.20 1.571
5 1.043 0.625 0.31 1.963
6 1.502 0.750 0.44 2.356
7 2.044 0.875 0.60 2.749
8 2.670 1.000 0.79 3.142
9 3.400 1.128 1.00 3.544
10 4.303 1.270 1.27 3.990
11 5.313 1.410 1.56 4.430
14 7.650 1.693 2.25 5.320
18 13.600 2.257 4.00 7.090
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
OCT 97
Table 2.11-3
Common Stock Styles of
Welded Wire Reinforcement
Style Designation Steel Area Approximate
Former Designation Current Designation
(in.
2
/ft) Weight
(By Steel Wire Gage) (By W-Number) Longit. Trans.
12x6-10x7 12x6-W1.4xW2.5 0.014 0.050 23
12x6-8x4 12x6-W2.0xW4.0 0.020 0.080 35
12x6-10x6 12x6-W1.4xW2.9 0.014 0.058 27
6x6-10x10 6x6-W1.4xW1.4 0.029 0.029 21
4x12-8x12 4x12-W2.1xW0.9 0.062 0.009 25
6x6-8x8 6x6-W2.1xW2.1 0.041 0.041 30
4x4-10x10 4x4-W1.4xW1.4 0.043 0.043 31
4x12-7x11 4x12-W2.5xW1.1 0.074 0.011 31
6x6-6x6 6x6-W2.9xW2.9 0.058 0.058 42
4x4-8x8 4x4-W2.1xW2.1 0.062 0.062 44
6x6-4x4 6x6-W4.0xW4.0 0.080 0.080 58
4x4-6x6 4x4-W2.9xW2.9 0.087 0.087 62
6x6-2x2 6x6-W5.5xW5.5 0.110 0.110 80
4x4-4x4 4x4-W4.0xW4.0 0.120 0.120 85
4x4-3x3 4x4-W4.7xW4.7 0.141 0.141 102
4x4-2x2 4x4-W5.5xW5.5 0.165 0.165 119
Availability of styles should be verified by the local supplier.
(lb/100 ft
2
)
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
OCT 97
Table 2.11-4
Sizes of Wires used in Welded
Wire Reinforcement
Nominal Nominal Area (in.
2
/ft of width)
Wire Size Number Diameter* Weight* Center to Center Spacing (in.)
Plain Deformed in. plf 2 3 4 6 8 10 12
W45 D45 0.757 1.530 2.700 1.800 1.350 0.900 0.675 0.540 0.450
W31 D31 0.628 1.054 1.860 1.240 0.930 0.620 0.465 0.372 0.310
W30 D30 0.618 1.020 1.800 1.200 0.900 0.600 0.450 0.360 0.300
W28 D28 0.597 0.952 1.680 1.120 0.840 0.560 0.420 0.336 0.280
W26 D26 0.575 0.884 1.560 1.040 0.780 0.520 0.390 0.312 0.260
W24 D24 0.553 0.816 1.440 0.960 0.720 0.480 0.360 0.288 0.240
W22 D22 0.529 0.748 1.320 0.880 0.660 0.440 0.330 0.264 0.220
W20 D20 0.504 0.680 1.200 0.800 0.600 0.400 0.300 0.240 0.200
W18 D18 0.478 0.612 1.080 0.720 0.540 0.360 0.270 0.216 0.180
W16 D16 0.451 0.544 0.960 0.640 0.480 0.320 0.240 0.192 0.160
W14 D14 0.422 0.476 0.840 0.560 0.420 0.280 0.210 0.168 0.140
W12 D12 0.390 0.408 0.720 0.480 0.360 0.240 0.180 0.144 0.120
W11 D11 0.374 0.374 0.660 0.440 0.330 0.220 0.165 0.132 0.110
W10.5 0.366 0.357 0.630 0.420 0.315 0.210 0.158 0.126 0.105
W10 D10 0.356 0.340 0.600 0.400 0.300 0.200 0.150 0.120 0.100
W9.5 0.348 0.323 0.570 0.380 0.285 0.190 0.143 0.114 0.095
W9 D9 0.338 0.306 0.540 0.360 0.270 0.180 0.135 0.108 0.090
W8.5 0.329 0.289 0.510 0.340 0.255 0.170 0.128 0.102 0.085
W8 D8 0.319 0.272 0.480 0.320 0.240 0.160 0.120 0.096 0.080
W7.5 0.309 0.255 0.450 0.300 0.225 0.150 0.113 0.090 0.075
W7 D7 0.299 0.238 0.420 0.280 0.210 0.140 0.105 0.084 0.070
W6.5 0.288 0.221 0.390 0.260 0.195 0.130 0.098 0.078 0.065
W6 D6 0.276 0.204 0.360 0.240 0.180 0.120 0.090 0.072 0.060
W5.5 0.264 0.187 0.330 0.220 0.165 0.110 0.083 0.066 0.055
W5 D5 0.252 0.170 0.300 0.200 0.150 0.100 0.075 0.060 0.050
W4.5 0.240 0.153 0.270 0.180 0.135 0.090 0.068 0.054 0.045
W4 D4 0.225 0.136 0.240 0.160 0.120 0.080 0.060 0.048 0.040
W3.5 0.211 0.119 0.210 0.140 0.105 0.070 0.053 0.042 0.035
W3 D3 0.195 0.102 0.180 0.120 0.090 0.060 0.045 0.036 0.030
W2.9 0.192 0.098 0.174 0.116 0.087 0.058 0.044 0.035 0.029
W2.5 0.178 0.085 0.150 0.100 0.075 0.050 0.038 0.030 0.025
W2.1 0.162 0.070 0.126 0.084 0.063 0.042 0.032 0.025 0.021
W2 D2 0.159 0.068 0.120 0.080 0.060 0.040 0.030 0.024 0.020
W1.5 0.138 0.051 0.090 0.060 0.045 0.030 0.023 0.018 0.015
W1.4 0.134 0.049 0.084 0.056 0.042 0.028 0.021 0.017 0.014
* Based on ASTM A 496
(in.) (plf)
The following list of standards and manuals is provided for the convenience of the
reader because not all documents are referenced in the text of this chapter. The com-
plete serial designation of each document includes a year of adoption. However, since
these documents are updated on a frequent basis, the year has been omitted. The
reader is referred to the respective organizations for the latest revisions and year of
adoption.
HB Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
LRFD AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
HM Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling
and Testing
M6 Fine Aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete
M31 Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
M32 Steel Wire, Plain, for Concrete Reinforcement
M42 Rail-Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
M43 Sizes of Aggregate for Road and Bridge Construction
M53 Axle-Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
M54 Fabricated Deformed Steel Bar Mats for Concrete Reinforcement
M55 Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Plain, for Concrete Reinforcement
M80 Coarse Aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete
M85 Portland Cement
M144 Calcium Chloride
M154 Air-Entraining Admixtures for Concrete
M194 Chemical Admixtures for Concrete
M195 Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete
M203 Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for Concrete Reinforcement
M204 Uncoated Stress-Relieved Steel Wire for Prestressed Concrete
M205 Molds for Forming Concrete Test Cylinders Vertically
M221 Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Deformed, for Concrete Reinforcement
M225 Steel Wire, Deformed, for Concrete Reinforcement
M240 Blended Hydraulic Cement
M275 Uncoated High Strength Steel Bar for Prestressing Concrete
M284 Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Bars
M295 Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral
Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete
M302 Ground Iron Blast-Furnace Slag for Use in Concrete and Mortars
M307 Microsilica for Use in Concrete and Mortar
T24 Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete
T26 Quality of Water To Be Used in Concrete
T106 Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar (Using 2 in. or 50 mm Cube
Specimens)
T131 Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.12 Relevant Standards and Publications/2.12.2 AASHTO Standard Methods of Test
OCT 97
2.12
RELEVANT STANDARDS
AND PUBLICATIONS
2.12.1
AASHTO Standard
Specifications
2.12.2
AASHTO Standard
Methods of Test
T137 Air Content of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
T152 Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method
T160 Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic Cement Mortar and Concrete
T161 Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing
T196 Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Volumetric Method
T199 Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Chase Indicator
T259 Resistance of Concrete to Chloride Ion Penetration
T277 Electrical Indication of Concretes Ability to Resist Chloride
207.1 Mass Concrete
209R Predictions of Creep, Shrinkage and Temperature Effects in Concrete Structures
211.1 Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight and Mass
Concrete
211.2 Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Structural Lightweight Concrete
212.3R Chemical Admixtures for Concrete
213R Guide for Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete
215R Considerations for Design of Concrete Structures Subject to Fatigue Loading
221R Guide for the Use of Normal Weight Aggregates in Concrete
223 Standard Practice for the Use of Shrinkage-Compensating Concrete
226.1R Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag as a Cementitious Constituent in
Concrete
226.3R Use of Fly Ash in Concrete
308 Standard Practice for Curing Concrete
315 Details and Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement
318 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete
343R Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Structures
345R Guide for Concrete Highway Bridge Deck Construction
363R State-of-the-Art Report on High Strength Concrete
423.3R Recommendations for Concrete Members Prestressed with Unbonded Tendons
439.3R Mechanical Connections of Reinforcing Bars
440 State-of-the-Art Report on Fiber Reinforced Plastic Reinforcement for Concrete
Structures
A 82 Specification for Steel Wire, Plain, for Concrete Reinforcement
A 184 Specification for Fabricated Deformed Steel Bar Mats for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 185 Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Plain, for Concrete Reinforcement
A 416 Specification for Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for Prestressed Concrete
A 421 Specification for Uncoated Stress-Relieved Wire for Prestressed Concrete
A 496 Specification for Steel Wire, Deformed, for Concrete Reinforcement
A 497 Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Deformed, for Concrete
Reinforcement
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.12.2 AASHTO Standard Methods of Test/2.12.4 ASTM Standard Specifications
OCT 97
2.12.3
ACI Publications
2.12.4
ASTM Standard
Specifications
A 615 Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 616 Specification for Rail-Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
A 617 Specification for Axle-Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
A 706 Specification for Low-Alloy Deformed Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
A 722 Specification for Uncoated High Strength Steel Bar for Prestressing Concrete
A 767 Specification for Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Steel Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement
A 775 Specification for Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Steel Bars
A 882 Specification for Epoxy-Coated Seven-Wire Prestressing Steel Strand
A 884 Specification for Epoxy-Coated Steel Wire and Welded Wire Fabric for
Reinforcement
C 33 Specification for Concrete Aggregates
C 94 Specification for Ready-Mixed Concrete
C 150 Specification for Portland Cement
C 260 Specification for Air-Entraining Admixtures for Concrete
C 330 Specification for Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete
C 470 Specification for Molds for Forming Concrete Test Cylinders Vertically
C 494 Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete
C 595 Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements
C 618 Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use
as a Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete
C 845 Specification for Expansive Hydraulic Cement Concrete and Mortar
C 989 Specification for Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag for Use in Concrete and
Mortars
C 1107 Specification for Package Dry, Hydraulic-Cement Grout (Nonshrink)
C 1240 Specification for Silica Fume for Use in Hydraulic Cement, Concrete and Mortar
D 98 Specification for Calcium Chloride
D 448 Specification for Standard Sizes of Coarse Aggregate for Highway Construction
D 3963 Specification for Fabrication and Jobsite Handling of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing
Steel Bars
C 42 Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of
Concrete
C 109 Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using
2-in. or 50-mm Cube Specimens)
C 138 Test Method for Unit Weight, Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete
C 157 Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar
and Concrete
C 173 Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Volumetric
Method
C 185 Test Method for Air Content of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
C 186 Test Method for Heat of Hydration of Hydraulic Cement
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.12.4 ASTM Standard Specifications/2.12.5 ASTM Standard Test Methods
OCT 97
2.12.5
ASTM Standard Test
Methods
C 191 Test Method for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle
C 227 Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations
(Mortar-Bar Method)
C 231 Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method
C 289 Test Method for Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates (Chemical
Method)
C 342 Test Method for Potential Volume Change of Cement-Aggregate Combinations
C 418 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Concrete by Sandblasting
C 441 Test Method for Effectiveness of Mineral Admixtures of Ground Blast-Furnace
Slag in Preventing Excessive Expansion of Concrete Due to the Alkali-Silica
Reaction
C 452 Test Method for Potential Expansion of Portland Cement Mortars Exposed to
Sulfate
C 469 Test Method for Static Modulus and Poissons Ratio of Concrete in Compression
C 512 Test Method for Creep of Concrete in Compression
C 586 Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Carbonate Rocks for Concrete
Aggregates (Rock Cylinder Method)
C 597 Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete
C 666 Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing
C 671 Test Method for Critical Dilation of Concrete Specimens Subjected to Freezing
C 672 Test Method for Scaling Resistance of Concrete Surfaces Exposed to Deicing
Chemicals
C 682 Practice for Evaluation of Frost Resistance of Coarse Aggregates in Air-Entrained
Concrete by Critical Dilation Procedures
C 779 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Horizontal Concrete Surfaces
C 803 Test Method for Penetration Resistance of Hardened Concrete
C 805 Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete
C 827 Test Method for Change in Height at Early Ages of Cylindrical Specimens from
Cementitious Mixtures
C 900 Test Method for Pullout Strength of Hardened Concrete
C 944 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Concrete or Mortar Surfaces by the
Rotating-Cutter Method
C1012 Test Method for Length Change of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars Exposed to a
Sulfate Solution
C1090 Test Method for Measuring Changes in Height of Cylindrical Specimens from
Hydraulic-Cement Grout
C1202 Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concretes Ability to Resist Chloride Ion
Penetration
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.12.5 ASTM Standard Test Methods
OCT 97
This list of cross references is provided for ease of comparing two similar documents.
In many cases, the two documents are not identical and should not be interchanged
without review of their content.
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, First Edition, American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 1994
Buckner, D. C., An Analysis of Transfer and Development Lengths for Pretensioned
Concrete Structures, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Report No.
FHWA-RD-94-049, 1994, 108 pp
CEB-FIP Model Code 1990, Bulletin dInformation No. 213/214, Comite Euro-
International du Beton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1990
Gulyas, R. J., Wirthlin, G. J. and Champa, J. T., Evaluation of Keyway Grout Test
Methods for Precast Concrete Bridges, PCI JOURNAL, V. 40, No. 1, January-
February 1995, pp. 44-57
Magura, D. D., Sozen, M. A. and Seiss, C. P., A Study of Stress Relaxation in
Prestressing Reinforcement, PCI JOURNAL, V. 9, No. 2, April 1964, pp. 13-57
Martinez, S., Nilson, A. H. and Slate, F. O., Spirally Reinforced High Strength
Concrete Columns, Research Report No. 82-10, Department of Structural
Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, August, 1982
PCI Committee on Epoxy-Coated Strand, Guidelines for the Use of Epoxy-
Coated Strand, PCI JOURNAL, V. 38, No. 4, July-August 1993, pp. 26-32
Post-Tensioning Manual, Post-Tensioning Institute, Phoenix, AZ, 1990
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16thEdition, American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 1996
Zia, P., Leming, M. L., and Ahmad, S. H., High Performance Concretes, A State-
of-the-Art Report, Report No. SHRP-C/FR-91-103, Strategic Highway Research
Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1991
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
2.12.6 Cross References ASTM-AASHTO/2.12.7 Cited References
OCT 97
ASTM AASHTO
A 82 M32
A 184 M54
A 185 M55
A 416 M203
A 421 M204
A 496 M225
A 497 M221
A 615 M31
ASTM AASHTO
A 616 M42
A 617 M53
A 722 M275
C 42 T24
C 109 T106
C 150 M85
C 157 T160
C 173 T196
ASTM AASHTO
C 185 T137
C 191 T131
C 231 T152
C 260 M154
C 330 M195
C 470 M205
C 494 M194
C 595 M240
ASTM AASHTO
C 618 M295
C 666 T161
C 989 M302
C 1202 T277
C 1240 M307
D 98 M144
D 448 M43
2.12.6
Cross References
ASTM-AASHTO
2.12.7
Cited References

Notation: Pci Bridge Design Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notation: Pci Bridge Design Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notation: Pci Bridge Design Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NOTATION

PCI BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL CHAPTER 2

40 000 1 000 000

You might also like