POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES

OPEN UNIVERSITY
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
MIT 601 COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS
SUMMER 2014
Remedios G. Ado ou.em!"!#$oo.%om& '#do"(u(.edu.($
COURSE S)**A+US
Description: This course study on the different layers of the network architecture. The students
are expected to acquire understanding on information network concepts and technologies to
enhance their skills and knowledge in computer networking as well as to prepare and enable
them for the industrial practice of network planning, design, implementation, and management.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
At the end of the course students are expected:
To gain knowledge on network architecture and its significance for learning about OS!
SO and T"#$#, their hierarchical, the role played by each layer in the hierarchy.
%nderstand the necessity of network architecture, standardi&ation, types of architecture,
and de facto standards
Obtain an o'er'iew and understanding of the network equipment and cabling.
To learn about desktop management and ser'er applications
To practice network planning and designing
To present their network pro(ect design of a specific company
TOPICS:

A. The Internet (May ! Tea" #
). The historical background * de'elopment of the internet
+. The structure of internet
,. nternet technology * Ser'ices
-. Search .ngines
/.
B. Pr$t$%$&' an( Tran'")'')$n C$ntr$& (May ! Tea" #
). The background of the birth of network architecture
+. Standards of 0etwork Architecture
,. Types of network architecture
-. 0etwork Topology and "onnections 1ethod
C. OSI * Stan(ar()+at)$n $, C$""-n)%at)$n Pr$t$%$&' (May ! Tea" .
). O'er'iew of OS
+. OS 2asic 3eference 1odel
,. "ommunication #rocedures in OS
/. TCP0IP Stan(ar(' an( C$""-n)%at)$n Pr$t$%$&' 0 Pr$%e(-re'
(May ! Tea" .
). O'er'iew of T"#$ #
+. 4ierarchical structure
,. The roles of each layer
-. # addresses and subnet mask
/. Special # addresses
5. 1edia Access "ontrol 61A"7 addresses
8. Address 3esolution #rotocol 6A3#7
)
E. Net1$r2' : LAN an( 3AN (May #4! Tea" 5
). 9eatures and Topology of :A0$;A0
+. :A0$;A0 "onnection Architecture
,. :A0$;A0 "omponents
-. :A0 Access "ontrol 1ethods
/. nter!:A0 "onnection .quipment
5. :A0 Speed!up technology
8. 0etwork .quipment and cabling
F. Ty6e' $, Ser7er' (May #4! Tea" 5 8
). <esktop 1anagement
+. <0S Ser'er
,. <4"# Ser'er
-. 1ail Ser'er
/. 9T# Ser'er
5. nternet $ ;eb Ser'er
8. #roxy Ser'er
=. <atabase Ser'er
>. Other types of Ser'ers
G. Net1$r2 Se%-r)ty (May #4! Tea" 9
). "onfidentiality #rotection and 9alsification #re'ention
+. llegal ntrusion and #rotection against computer 'iruses
,. A'ailability measures
-. #ri'acy protection
H. 3)re&e'' Te%hn$&$:y an( L$n: Ter" E7$&-t)$n(LTE! (May #4! Tea" 9
I. S-;")'')$n $, F)na& Pr$<e%t Pr$6$'a& 0 A;'tra%t May #4= .>#
J. F)na& Pr$<e%t Pre'entat)$n : J-ne #= .>#
?. F)na& E@a" : J-ne #= .>#
References:
2uild ?our Own 0etwork and Ser'er by @"A!0et
"omputer 0etworks A Andrew Tanenbaum
<ata 0etworks A %lyses 2lack
<ata Transmission A Tugal$Tugal
Ad'anced .lectronic "ommunication System A ;ayne Tomasi
<ata "ommunication Technology A @ames 1artin
0etworking #ersonal "omputers A <urr$Bibbs
Requirements:
9inal .xamination 60etwork <esign: <ocumentation and #resentation7 59%
Cui&&es$Seatwork$.xercises .>%
0etwork 3esearch$3eporting 20%
Supporting documents * "< containing the soft files of the Sub(ect Outputs 10%
Attendance #>%
"lassroom participation 5%
Requirements Outline
). A2ST3A"T O9 T4. 0.T;O3D #3O@."T #3O#OSA: 6) TO + pages only7
(Deadline: May 18 , 2014
).). "ompany #rofile
+
).+. #roblem6s7
).,. #roposed Solution6s7
).-. Acti'ity #lan
).-.). #ro(ect <escription
).-.+. #lanned Acti'ities
).-.,. Assignments$ Tasking
).-.-. Schedule of Acti'ities and "ost 3equirements
)./. Authors #rofile
)./.). "omplete 0ame
)./.+. 2irthday
)./.,. 2achelorEs <egree
)./.-. School
)././. #osition
)./.5. "ompany
)./.8. "ontact details
)./.8.). Telephone 0umber6s7 63esidence$Office7
)./.8.+. 1obile 0umber
)./.8.,. .!mail Address
+. TO#" 3.S.A3"4 (Deadline: Document ! as sc"eduled
+.). #owerpoint presentation
+.+. 3esearch 6nformation gathered7
+.,. Synthesis 6analysis based on the research7
+.-. 3eferences
,. 09O0.T <O"%1.0TATO0 6"ompilation of "ourse 1odule, Topic 3eport, and
0etwork #ro(ect #roposal7 (Date of #u$mission: %s indi&idually sc"eduled' (o)e&er t"e *nte+rated
compilation )it" ,D is sc"eduled on t"e -ro.ect -resentation date

-. 0.T;O3D #3O@."T #3O#OSA:
(Deadline : -ro.ect /inal Document ! 0une 1, 2014
-resentation, *nte+rated Document 1 ,D ! 0une 1, 2014:
-.) co'er page
-.+ Appro'ed Abstract
-., Table of contents
-.- ntroduction
-./ Organi&ation 9ramework
A. Fision $ 1ission Statement
2. Organi&ational "hart
". Strategic Thrusts and #rograms
<. Strategic "oncerns for T
.. .xisting System
9. #resent Office :ay A Out
B. Site 1ap
-.5 nformation Systems Strategy
-.8 <escription of <atabases
-.= #roposed System
-.> Technology Strategy
-.)G mplementation Strategy
-.)) #hoto <ocumentation
-.)+ Appendices
-.), 3eferences
,
PUP OPEN UNIVERSITY
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS
PROJECT PRESENTATION RATING SHEET
Group Name: #roposed #ro(ect:
<ate: #rofessor: .ngr. 3emedios B. Ado
O+,ECTI-ES
The 1ain ob(ecti'e of this presentation is for the professor to closely examine the components of
the proposed pro(ect. 4ence, the students must be able to present the following:
. 2r+ani3ational /rame)or4 ! si&e of agency in terms of number of personnel and
budgetH mission statement which contains the goals of the agency based on its mandateH
strategic thrusts or programs of the agency stating its ma(or undertaking to achie'e goalsH
business systems that are pursued regularly for the implementation of the programsH and
strategic concerns for T use showing how the agency intends to apply T.
. *nformation #ystems #trate+y A description of identified nformation Systems 6Ss7H
mpact of the Ss to the agencyEs thrusts, business operations, and strategic areas of
go'ernanceH information system linkages which sows the functional usage of the S to a
workgroupH strategy to be used in the de'elopment of the identified SsH and description of
databases to be created.
. 5ec"nolo+y #trate+y A technology option chosen which points out what computing
scheme to be adoptedH technology establishment which shows the resources to be used for the
agencyEs computeri&ationH T organi&ational structure en'isionedH and technology chosen
which must be sustainable o'er a reasonable period of time.
F. *mplementation #trate+y A prioriti&ation of Ss to be de'elopedH phasing of S
de'elopment acti'ities is feasible and logicalH and cost estimation for the T n'estment and
<e'elopment #rogram.
TIME REAUIREMENT:
.ach group will be gi'en .> minutes to discuss all the requirements and time for the question
and answer portion. All members should ha'e been presented their parts as they are also rated
indi'idually.
-
RATING
The indi'idual ratings should be pro'ided for each of the items listed by marking the appropriate
number in the scale. 9or this particular scale, a grade of ten 6)G7 is the highest and six 657 is the
lowest.
IN/ICATORS RATING
A. S-;'tan%e B C 4 D #>
). <o all required components properly presentedI
+. s the proposed pro(ect A operationally, technically and
economically feasibleI
,. <o the proposed information systems reconcile with the
requirements of the agencyI
-. s the implementation strategy chosen for the proposed
pro(ect appropriateI
/. Are the implementation acti'ities logically relatedI
5. s the implementation schedule realistic
B. ORAL PRESENTATION
). s the presentation well organi&edI
+. Are the 'isual aids used adequateI
,. s the group able to defend$(ustify the items presentedI
-. s the presentation interestingI
/. s the mode of deli'ery clearI
5. <o the presentors display professional deportmentI
6courteous replies, good business manners, etc.7
8. s the group properly attired for the presentationI
=. s the group able to utili&e properly its allotted time for the
presentationI
C. DOCUMENTATION
). s the documentation complete A does it contain all the
required elements$ write!up done in satisfactory le'elI
+. s the documentation clear$easy to understandI
,. s the documentation supporti'e of the oral presentationI
/
-. s the documentation neat, properly collated and bound, free
from typing errors, etc.I
D. EVALUATION OF GROUP MEMBERS
Leader :
Member 1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
E. COMMENTS/REMARS
5
PUP OPEN UNIVERSITY
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS
REPORT RATING SHEET
Group Name: #roposed #ro(ect:
<ate: #rofessor: .ngr. 3emedios B. Ado
TIME REAUIREMENT:
.ach group will be gi'en 5> minutes to discuss the topic and time for the question and answer
portion. All members should ha'e been presented their parts as they are also rated indi'idually.
RATING
The indi'idual ratings should be pro'ided for each of the items listed by marking the appropriate
number in the scale. 9or this particular scale, a grade of ten 6)G7 is the highest and six 657 is the
lowest.
IN/ICATORS RATING
REPORT PRESENTATION
B C 4 D #>
). s the presentation well organi&edI
+. Are the 'isual aids used adequateI
,. s the group able to discuss the topic efficientlyI
-. s the reporting interestingI
/. s the mode of deli'ery clearI
5. <o the reporters display professional deportmentI 6courteous
replies, good business manners, etc.7
8. s the group able to utili&e properly its allotted time for the
reportingI
8
EVALUATION OF GROUP MEMBERS
Leader :
Member 1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
E. COMMENTS/REMARS
=