FENET Budapest Feb2005 DLE DesignByAnalysis Mackenzie
FENET Budapest Feb2005 DLE DesignByAnalysis Mackenzie
FENET Budapest Feb2005 DLE DesignByAnalysis Mackenzie
y
Elastic
Shakedown
r
Elastic-perfectly
plastic material
If yielding does not
occur during
unloading subsequent
re-loading is wholly
elastic
The structure is said
to exhibit Elastic
Shakedown
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Plastic Shakedown
Plastic Shakedown
Elastic-perfectly
plastic material
Loading
Unloading
Alternating
Plasticity
+
p
p
p
(a)
(b)
Unloading plastic strain equal and opposite to loading plastic
strain
Causes local damage and local failure mechanism
Low cycle fatigue associated with plastic strain range, p
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Ratchetting
Ratchetting
Loading
Unloading
+
p
p
(a)
Ratchetting
d
p
d
p
(b) (c)
Net plastic strain increment d
p
for each cycle
Accumulates dp to form global failure mechanism
Ratchetting or Incremental plastic collapse
Ratchetting is not permitted in pressure vessel design
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Analysis Methods
Analysis Methods
The Codes do not specify use of specific analysis methods in
design
In practice the terminology used suggests that the expected method is
shell discontinuity analysis
State of the art in the 1960s
Finite Element Analysis now predominates
The analysis capability has greatly outgrown
PVD Code requirements
Problems can arise in interpreting
code guidelines
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Elastic & Plastic Analysis
Elastic & Plastic Analysis
Most Code guidelines are for elastic analysis
Problematic as gross plastic deformation and incremental Plastic collapse
are inelastic failure mechanisms
The Codes give limited guidelines for plastic analysis
Mostly limit analysis
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Elastic Analysis & Stress Categorisation
Elastic Analysis & Stress Categorisation
Elastic stress is categorised into three classes:
Primary stress
Associated with gross plastic deformation
Secondary stress (plus primary stress)
Associated with incremental plastic collapse
Peak stress (plus Primary plus secondary)
Associated with fatigue failure
Each type of stresses is limited to different allowable values
Specified in terms of a design stress
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Stress Classification
Stress Classification
Difficult and often subjective
Limited guidelines for specific configurations given in Codes
Categories defined in terms of membrane and bending
distributions
Stress Classification
(PD5500)
Allowable Stress Intensity
(wrt Design Stress f)
Allowable Stress
Intensity
(wrt Yield Stress
y
)
General primary membrane f
m
f 2/3
y
Local primary membrane f
L
1.5 f
y
Primary membrane plus bending
(f
m
+ f
b
) or (f
L
+ f
b
)
1.5 f
y
Primary plus secondary
(f
m
+ f
B
+f
q
Q) or (f
L
+ f
b
+f
q
)
3 f 2
y
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Stress Limits
Stress Limits
Primary stress
Yield limited to prevent gross plastic deformation
Primary plus secondary
Limited to twice yield to assure shakedown
Primary plus secondary plus peak
Determines fatigue design life
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Shell FEA
Shell FEA
Can be used to model thin-shell vessels
Results given as membrane and bending stress
Compatible with Code categories
Cannot be used for
Configurations with significant non-linear variation in through-thickness
stress (thick vessels)
Complex 2-D or 3-D geometry
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Solid FEA
Solid FEA
Can be used to model any 2-D or 3-D configuration
The total elastic stress at a point is defined by six elementary
stresses
ij
Not compatible with Code membrane and bending stress
categories
A methodology is required to relate the distribution of to
ij
the code categories
Most widely used method is through-thickness Stress Linearisation
Extracts pseudo membrane and bending stress from elastic
distribution
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Linearising
Linearising
Membrane Stress
Membrane Stress
0
h
2
-h
2
X
3
ij
0
h
2
-h
2
X
3
ij
w
ij
( )
m
Nonlinear Stress Equivalent Membrane Stress
w
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Linearising
Linearising
Bending Stress
Bending Stress
0
h
2
-h
2
X
3
ij
0
h
2
-h
2
X
3
ij
w
ij
( )
b
Nonlinear Stress Equivalent Bending Stress
ij
X3
x3
ij
( )
b
w
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Linearisation
Linearisation
Example
Example
Cl ass Li ne A
Cl ass Li ne B
x
x
y
y
Axisymmetric
cylindrical shell with
flat head
Class Line A
axial stress
Reasonable
linearisation?
Y
local
system
(N/mm
2
)
Distance through section (mm)
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Linearisation
Linearisation
Example
Example
Cl ass Li ne A
Cl ass Li ne B
x
x
y
y
Class Line B
axial stress
Reasonable
linearisation?
How should the
difference between
total and mem+bend
stress be treated?
Is it a peak stress?
If so, where is the
associated SCF?
Y
l ocal
system
(N/mm
2
)
Distance through secti on (mm)
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Limitations of Elastic Analysis
Limitations of Elastic Analysis
The major problem is stress categorisation
Stress distribution must be defined in terms of membrane, bending and
peak stress.
There is no theoretical justification for linearising certain regions of a
vessel
Many papers have been published on the subject, more or less
concluding that:
It is appropriate to place a class line anywhere in a vessel except
where you would actually like to place one
i.e. where the stress distribution is complex
In practice, designers usually regard linearisation as valid throughout the
vessel, for both 2-D and 3-D models
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Barriers to Elastic FEA
Barriers to Elastic FEA
The major problem is stress categorisation
1997 survey of the European pressure vessel industry (as part of the
JRC/EPERC Design by Analysis project) identified interpretation of finite
element analysis results as the major problem in design by analysis.
The designer is required to:
Obtain linearised membrane and bending stresses
Assign these to the appropriate category
Primary yield limited, possible over-conservative
Secondary twice yield limited, possible not conservative
Code guidance is limited
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Inelastic Analysis
Inelastic Analysis
Inelastic analysis removes the stress categorisation problem
The analysis is related directly to inelastic failure mechanisms
Gross plastic deformation
Ratchetting
Routine inelastic FEA capabilities have now overtaken DBA
guidelines
Different types of inelastic analysis are included in the different Codes
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
PD5500 Inelastic DBA
PD5500 Inelastic DBA
Considers Limit Analysis for gross plastic deformation check
Elastic-perfectly plastic material model
Small deformation (linear geometry) theory
Analysis evaluates the Limit Load
The allowable load is 2/3 the limit load
Relatively simple to perform
Requires only Code material data
May be applied to non-standard configurations
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
EN13445
EN13445
Inelastic DBA
Inelastic DBA
Considers Limit analysis but Annex B Design by Analysis Direct
Route [2] states:
In checks on structures where deformation has an unfavorable
(weakening) effect, geometrically non-linear effects shall be taken into
account in gross plastic deformation checks.
Accounts for geometric weakening
No rules or procedures given for including material strain hardening
Enhances load carrying capacity
May be applied to any configuration
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
ASME VIII Inelastic DBA
ASME VIII Inelastic DBA
Limit analysis procedures similar to PD5500
Geometric non-linearity and strain hardening effects may be
incorporated in a Plastic Analysis
Defines the plastic load by application of a criterion of plastic
collapse
The allowable load is 2/3 the plastic load
Plastic criterion dependent
ASME Twice Elastic Slope criterion has been shown to be
inconsistent
Often results in plastic load similar to limit load
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Shakedown
Shakedown
Shakedown analysis procedures are limited and not generally
well understood
Inelastic shakedown analysis is permissible but not widely used
Incremental and bounding theorem approaches
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Education & Training Requirements
Education & Training Requirements
PD5500 and ASME VIII do not stipulate any particular
education or training requirements for the designer
EN13445 B and EN13445 C both stipulate that when using
advanced analysis techniques:
Due to the advanced methods applied, until sufficient in-house
experience can be demonstrated, the involvement of an independent
body, appropriately qualified in the field of DBA, is required in the
assessment of the design (calculations) and the potential definition of
particular NDT requirements.
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Education & Training Requirements
Education & Training Requirements
The Design by Analysis Manual (European Commission, DG-
JRC/IAM, Petten, The Netherlands, 1999)
Contains an extensive account of PV DBA
An e-version is available on-line and free at:
http://ped.eurodyn.com/jrc/design_by_analysis
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Use of DBA in Industry
Use of DBA in Industry
DBA tends to be used only when DBF is not possible
Non-standard configurations
Problem designs that do not satisfy DBF
Tends to be restricted to organisations manufacturing advanced,
high capitol cost designs
Wider use limited by
Cost of computer hardware, software and in-house expertise
or
Cost of qualified external consultancy
FENET THEMATIC NETWORK
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
(GROWTH) PROGRAMME
Conclusion
Conclusion
FE based DBA is long established in PVD
Procedures were innovative when implemented but now lag
routine analysis capabilities
Advanced analysis methods simplify the design process
Code guidelines need to be improved for
Inelastic analysis including large deformation and strain hardening effects
Shakedown analysis
Adopting advanced analysis methods has implications for
Education & Training of designers