Ch3 Examples
Ch3 Examples
1. a) Show that sp
2
hybrid orbital h =
1
3
_
s +
2p
x
_
is normalized. The
functions s and p
x
denote normalized hydrogenlike atomic orbitals.
b) Normalize the following molecular orbital =
s,A
+
s,B
where
s,A
and
s,B
are normalized and is a parameter. Use the notation S for overlap
integral to simplify the result.
Solution:
a)
_
|h|
2
d =
1
3
_ _
s +
2p
x
_
2
d =
1
3
_
_
_
s
2
d
. .
=1
+
2
_
sp
x
d
. .
=0
+2
_
p
2
x
d
. .
=1
_
_
=
1
3
3 = 1.
b) N
2
_
||
2
d = N
2
_
|
s,A
+
s,B
|
2
d
= N
2
_
_
_
|
s,A
|
2
d
. .
=1
+2
_
s,A
s,B
d
. .
=S
+
2
_
|
s,B
|
2
d
. .
=1
_
_
= N
2
(1 + 2S +
2
) = 1 N =
1
1+2S+
2
2. Consider hydrogen molecule (H(A)H(B)) with the LCAO-MO orbitals
formed from the atomic orbitals 1s
A
and 1s
B
:
1
g
= N
1
(1s
A
+ 1s
B
) and 1
u
= N
2
(1s
A
1s
B
)
a) Show that the Slater determinant corresponding to the ground state
solution is antisymmetric.
b) One of the excited states of H
2
corresponds to the following Slater
determinant:
MO
=
1
1
g
(1)(1) 1
u
(1)(1)
1
g
(2)(2) 1
u
(2)(2)
MO
=
1
1
g
(1)(1) 1
g
(1)(1)
1
g
(2)(2) 1
g
(2)(2)
=
1
2
[1
g
(1)1
g
(2)(1)(2) 1
g
(1)1
g
(2)(1)(2)]
=
1
2
1
g
(1)1
g
(2)
. .
symmetric
[(1)(2) (2)(1)]
. .
antisymmetric
A product of symmetric and antisymmetric functions given overall an anti-
symmetric function.
b) This corresponds to an electron conguration (1
1
g
)
1
(1
u
)
1
with parallel
spins. The term symbol is therefore
3
.
3. Determine the valence electron congurations and bond orders in the fol-
lowing molecules: C
+
2
, C
2
, C
2
, N
+
2
, N
2
, N
2
, O
+
2
, O
2
, O
2
. Which of these
molecules are paramagnetic and what are their term symbols?
Solution:
Use the correlation diagram to determine the order of orbitals for C
2
:
C
+
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
1
3
u
Bond order = 1.5 (weakest bonding);
2
u
.
C
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
1
4
u
Bond order = 2;
1
+
g
.
C
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
1
4
u
3
1
g
Bond order = 2.5 (strongest bonding);
2
+
g
.
N
+
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
1
4
u
3
1
g
Bond order = 2.5;
2
+
g
.
N
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
1
4
u
3
2
g
Bond order = 3.0 (strongest bonding);
1
+
g
.
N
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
1
4
u
3
2
g
1
1
g
Bond order = 2.5;
2
g
.
O
+
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
3
2
g
1
4
u
1
1
g
Bond order = 2.5 (strongest bonding);
2
g
.
O
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
3
2
g
1
4
u
1
2
g
Bond order = 2;
3
g
.
O
2
...2
2
g
2
2
u
3
2
g
1
4
u
1
3
g
Bond order = 1.5 (weakest bonding);
2
g
.
4. Sketch the molecular orbital diagram for B
2
molecule by using 1s, 2s and
2p atomic orbitals and all 10 electrons. What is the term symbol?
Solution:
The MO diagram is:
2
The term symbol is
3
g
.
5. a) Sketch a molecular orbital diagram for XeF molecule and determine the
electronic conguration. Would XeF
+
have shorter bond length than XeF?
b) Construct a molecular orbital diagram for the double bond (4 electrons)
in ethene by using the carbon sp
2
hybrid orbitals as basis set. Choose the
energy order of the and orbitals in such a way that a stable molecule is
formed.
c) Explain why Ne
2
molecule is not stable. Why are atoms with the out-
most s and p orbitals full (e.g. the octet electronic conguration) chemically
inert?
Solution:
a) XeF is not a homonuclear diatomic molecule. Thus the atomic orbitals
that form MOs originate from dierent principal quantum number levels.
The MO diagram is:
3
The bond order for XeF is (87)/2 = 0.5 and for XeF
+
(86)/2 = 1. Thus
the equilibrium bond length for XeF
+
is expected to be shorter than for XeF.
b) Consider the MOs of the C=C fragment:
Note that the order of the and
0
x
n
e
ax
dx =
n!
a
n+1
_
0
x
m
e
ax
2
dx =
[(m+1)/2]
2a
(m+1)/2
[n + 1] = n!, with 0! = 1 (n is integer)
[n + 1] = n[n]
_
1
2
Solution:
Use the variational principle and employ spherical coordinates in integrations:
E =
R
trial
H
trial
d
R
trial
trial
d
a)
_
trial
trial
d =
_
0
e
2kr
4r
2
dr
. .
d
= 4
_
0
r
2
e
2kr
dr =
k
3
_
trial
H
trial
d =
_
_
e
kr
_
_
h
2
2m
e
e
2
4
0
r
_
_
e
kr
_
d
=
_
0
_
e
kr
_
_
h
2
2m
e
_
2
r
2
+
2
r
r
_
e
2
4
0
r
_
_
e
kr
_ _
4r
2
dr
_
=
4 h
2
2m
e
_
0
_
e
kr
_
_
k
2
e
kr
2k
r
e
kr
_
r
2
dr
e
2
0
_
0
e
2kr
r
r
2
dr
=
4 h
2
2m
e
_
0
e
2kr
(r
2
k
2
2kr)dr
e
2
0
_
0
re
2kr
dr
5
=
2 h
2
k
2
m
e
_
0
r
2
e
2kr
dr
. .
=
2
(2k)
3
+
4 h
2
k
m
e
_
0
re
2kr
dr
. .
=
1
(2k)
2
e
2
0
_
0
re
2kr
dr
. .
=
1
(2k)
2
=
h
2
2m
e
k
+
h
2
m
e
k
e
2
4k
2
0
These results give:
_
Hd
_
d
=
_
h
2
2m
e
k
+
h
2
m
e
k
e
2
4k
2
0
_
/
_
/k
3
_
=
h
2
k
2
2m
e
+
h
2
k
2
m
e
e
2
k
4
0
=
h
2
k
2
2m
e
e
2
k
4
0
This expression must be minimized with respect to variational parameter k:
dE
dk
= d
_
h
2
k
2
2m
e
e
2
k
4
0
_
/dk =
h
2
k
m
e
e
2
4
0
= 0
k =
m
e
e
2
4
0
h
2
E =
1
2
m
e
e
4
(4
0
)
2
h
2
= hcR
where R is the Rydberg constant.
b) The logic is exactly the same as in part a).
_
trial
trial
d =
_
0
e
2kr
2
4r
2
dr
. .
d
=
4[3/2]
2(2k)
3/2
=
3/2
(2k)
3/2
The Laplacian of this function is given by:
trial
=
r
_
2kre
kr
2
_
+
2
r
(2kr) e
kr
2
=
_
4k
2
r
2
6k
_
e
kr
2
6
Thus the energy expectation value is (without normalization):
_
o
_
2 h
2
k
2
r
2
m
e
+
3k h
2
m
e
e
2
4
0
1
r
_
e
2kr
2
4r
2
dr
= 4
_
0
_
2 h
2
k
2
r
4
m
e
+
3k h
2
r
2
m
e
e
2
r
4
0
_
e
2kr
2
dr
=
8 h
2
k
2
m
e
_
0
r
4
e
2kr
2
dr
. .
[5/2]
2(2k)
5/2
=
3
8(2k)
5/2
+
12k h
2
m
e
_
o
r
2
e
2kr
2
dr
. .
[3/2]
2(2k)
3/2
=
4(2k)
3/2
e
2
0
_
0
re
2kr
2
dr
. .
[1]
2(2k)
=1/(4k)
=
3
3/2
h
2
4m
e
2k
+
3
3/2
h
2
2m
e
2k
e
2
4
0
k
trial
trial
d
_
trial
trial
d
=
3
3/2
h
2
4me
2k
+
3
3/2
h
2
2me
2k
e
2
4
0
k
3/2
(2k)
3/2
=
3 h
2
k
2m
e
+
6 h
2
k
2m
e
e
2
2k
2
3/2
0
=
3 h
2
k
2m
e
e
2
2
3/2
0
To nd the minimum value for energy (with respect to k), we calculate the
rst derivative and set it to zero:
E =
3 h
2
k
2m
e
e
2
2
3/2
E
k
=
3 h
2
2m
e
e
2
2
2
3/2
k
= 0
k =
_
m
e
e
2
3
2
3/2
0
h
2
_
2
=
m
2
e
e
4
18
3
2
0
h
4
The total energy at this point is:
7
E =
3 h
2
2m
e
m
2
e
e
4
18
3
2
0
h
4
e
2
2
3/2
m
e
e
2
3
2
3/2
0
h
2
=
m
e
e
4
12
3
2
0
h
2
2m
e
e
4
12
3
2
0
h
2
=
m
e
e
4
12
3
2
0
h
2
=
8
3
hcR 0.85hcR
c) The function in a) gives lower energy and therefore that trial function is
better.
7. Calculate the orbitals of allyl radical (corresponding to localized struc-
ture
.
CH
2
C=CH
2
, however, assume delocalization in your calculation) by
using the H uckel theory.
a) What is the wavelength of the LUMO HOMO electronic transition
when = 22, 000 cm
1
?
b) Calculate the charge densities and bond orders from the H uckel wavefunc-
tion. Denitions for these observables are given below:
Electron density on atom i:
(i) =
N
MO
j=1
|c
j
i
|
2
n
j
where n
j
is the number of electrons on orbital j and c
j
i
is the H uckel MO
coecient of the basis function centered on atom i for orbital j. The sum-
mation runs over the occupied orbitals.
Bond order between atoms i and j:
bond order =
N
MO
k=1
c
k
i
c
k
j
n
k
8
where the symbols are dened as above.
Solution:
First we construct the secular equation (matrix form) corresponding to the
H uckel approximation:
_
_
E 0
E
0 E
_
_
_
_
c
1
c
2
c
3
_
_
= 0
Denote x = ( E)/ and recall this set of equations has a non-trivial
solution only if the corresponding determinant is zero:
x 1 0
1 x 1
0 1 x
= 0
By expanding this determinant, we get:
x(x
2
1) x = x
3
2x = x(x
2
2) = 0 x =
_
_
_
0
+
2
E =
_
_
_
2
+
2
Thus we have the following energetics for the orbitals:
a) The energy dierence between HOMO and LUMO orbitals is:
E = E
LUMO
E
HOMO
=
2 =
2 =
2 (22, 000cm
1
)
9
E = 3.86eV (320 nm)
b) Next we calculate the coecients c
1
, c
2
and c
3
for the lowest energy orbital:
Here E = (
2c
1
. Ex-
actly the same way, equation c
2
+(E)c
3
= 0 gives c
2
=
2c
3
. Finally,
normalization gives: c
2
1
+ c
2
2
+ c
2
3
= 1 c
2
1
+ (
2c
1
)
2
+ c
2
1
= 4c
2
1
c
1
=
1
2
and by considering c
3
the same way, we also get c
3
=
1
2
.
Thus we have:
E = +
2 with c
1
=
1
2
, c
2
=
1
2
, c
3
=
1
2
E =
2 with c
1
=
1
2
, c
2
=
1
2
, c
3
=
1
2
For E = , we have: c
1
=
1
2
, c
2
= 0, c
3
=
1
2
.
The electron density on atom 1 can be obtained by squaring the atomic basis
function coecients and weighing this by the number of electrons on that
orbital:
Atom 1 (i = 1):
3
j=1
|c
j
i
|
2
n
j
=
_
1
2
_
2
2 +
_
1
2
_
2
1 +
_
1
2
_
2
0 = 1.
Atom 2 (i = 2):
3
j=1
|c
j
i
|
2
n
j
=
_
1
2
_
2
2 + 0
2
1 +
_
2
_
2
0 = 1.
Atom 3 (i = 3):
3
j=1
|c
j
i
|
2
n
j
=
_
1
2
_
2
2 +
_
2
_
2
1 +
_
1
2
_
2
0 = 1.
The total charge (three electrons) is distributed evely to all three atoms
and therefore the partial charges on carbon atoms are equal.
The bond orders can be valuated as follows:
Bond between atoms 1 and 2 (i = 1 and j = 2):
N
MO
k=1
c
k
i
c
k
j
n
k
=
_
1
2
__
1
2
_
2 +
_
1
2
_
0 1 +
_
1
2
__
2
_
0 =
1
2
10
Bond between atoms 2 and 3 (i = 2 and j = 3):
N
MO
k=1
c
k
i
c
k
j
n
k
=
_
1
2
__
1
2
_
2 +0
_
2
_
1 +
_
2
__
1
2
_
0 =
1
2
The bond order is less than one ( 0.707), which indicates that the bond is
not very strong.
11