UNIT 7 NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Structure

, 7.0 Objectives
7.1 Introduction 7.2 New Trends in USA
7.2.1 Changing Environment of Social Unrest 7.2.2 Phlladclphia Conference 7.2.3 Minnowbrwk Conference

7.3 Features of New Pubfic Administration

7.3. C Change and Administrative Responsiveness

7.3.1 Rationality 7.3.3 Management-Worker Relations 7.3.4 Slructures

'

7.3.5 Education in Public Administration

7.4 Goals of New Public Administration

7.4.1 Relevance 7.4.2 Values . 7.4.3 Social Equity 7.4.4,~ha;lge

7.5 Comments on New Public Administration 7.6 ~ eUS i Sum u p 7.7 Key Words 7.8 Some useful Books 7.9 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises

7.0 OBJECTIVES
After you have read this unit you should be ahlc to :
'

explain the significance of New Public ~dminisrratit;n explain the context of New Public Administration discuss the features pf New Public Administration: i ~ n d * explain the relevance of New Public Administr;~tion 10 clc\cloping societies.

7.1 INTRODUCTION
In the earlier units we hlivc discussed the new approaches in Public Administration like Comparative Administration and Develoflment Administration mainly in the context of developments in the subject to meet the requirements of developing societies. Even in developed societies like LISA, Canada and Britain, the administrative systems faced new ,challenges.The concept of New Public Administration is one r e s p n x to these challenges. In this unit we shall examine the significance, features, and relevance of New Public Administration.
J

7.2 NEW TRENDS

IN USA

In regard to the theory and practice of Public ~dministration rethinking and suggestions for reform took place among individual intallectuals its well as at common forums of the scholars and administratoxs.,For instance, F.C. Mosner e d i t 4 a pdblication, entitled "Governmental Reorganization: Cases and Commentaries (1%7)"..The book dealt With the common theme of administrative reorganisation and reform to strengthen administrative capability $nd responsibility. The discussions at #e various forums did not always result in

I'lieNature of Public Administration

any consensus among the participants about any set formulae for administrative change. However, several 'valuable view points did emerge, regarding introduction of changes in the theory and practice of Public Administration in response to the rapidly changing environment. This urge for change has resuIted in the organisation of several conferences in America. Of.these conferences one organised at Philadelphia in 1967 and the second organised a1 Minnowbrook in 1968 are the most important.

7 . 2 . 1 1 Changing Environment of Social Unrest

In the second half of the present century rapid environmental changes taking place in USA enabled her to achieve greater prosperity and power. But at the same time more and more social tensions and unrest among several sections of people began to take place. The social dissatisfaction and protests were mostly confined to the minority groups, the unemployed and certain highly sensitive youth groups. These became a matter of growing concern to the elected officials, the a'dn~inistrators, the intellectuals and the public leaders. A gbod deal of public debate and discussion began to take place as how to solve the challenging societal and technological problems. Several changes in policies and institutions began to be undertaken and some others were debated to strengthen political and administrative capabilities for coping with the rapidly changing environments: economic, social, political, technological and human.

7.2.2 Philadelphia Gonferemece

Major viewpoints expressed at this conference about the subject and practice of Public Administration are sumrnarised below :
a) With the progressive transformation ot;the liqited function state into a welfare state, the responsibilities and functions of its government have increased very considerably. This implies growth in the dimensions and functions of the administration. Since this growth is to be a continuous process, it would be erroneous to demarcate rigidly the boundaries of the study of Public Administration. The scope of the subject should remain flexible to facilitate its growth. Again, it being obvious that administrators are involved in po~idy making process as advisers and facilitators besides being primarily concerned with poticy implementation, the dichototny between policy and administration and therefore between the study of government and study of Public Administration is meaningless. b) Too much emphasis on perfection of hierarchy and internal processes in administrative organisations results in rigidities in administrative performance which detract from its relevance and efficacy in rapidly changing environments; organisational innovations and management flexibi!ihy,!re therefore .ippropriate. C) The subject and practice of Public ~dministration'shouldpay increased attention to the social problems of urban squalor, unemployment, poverty, environmental pollution ilnd degradation.

d) There are great socio-economic disparities between classes of people. Hence, social equity should be given due attention. For promoting equity as an administrative value alongwith the existing values of efficiency and accountability, as well as for improving administrative responsiveness, people's participation in administrative decision-making and activities should be institutionally provided in a reorganised administration. This would alsq mean that the study of public Administration should also include social equity a s s n e of the themes.
e) Education and training progran~mes in Public Administration should not only provide ' management abilities and technique skills but should also d,eepen the social sensitivity or consciousness of students/trainees as well as of the public personnel at work in various governmental agencies. Moreove~ administrative ethics needs due emphasis in education programmes so as to prevent or minimise the chances of malpractices and corruption.

7.2.3 Minnowbrook Conference

A year later in 1968 comparatively young scholars and practitioners of Public Administration met at Minnowbrook to critically review t6e relevance of the study and practice d Public Administration in termsrof rapidly changing environment posing challenging problems before the government and social system in the country. Several viewpoints were expressedvigorously. Though these were not much dissimilar lo the ones
I

_,.

'

at the Philadelphia Conference or by some individual academics at times, it was the passionate character of discussions which was the distinctive feature of the meet at Minnowbrook. Moreover, this was followed later on by small group meets of the to keep up the tempo of their viewpoints as well as to elucidate these for publicity or dissemination. The essence of the various viewpoints articulated by the young participants was the advocacy for a tionnative approach in place of the value-free efficiency approach of the classical theory. This normative approach stresses that the purpose of governmental administration should be reduction of economic, social a& psychic suffering and the enhancement of life opportunities both for the employees of t h i government as wdl as for citizens. RI other words, concerned sections of people should be freed from deprivations, wants and social disabilities. For this purpose, it was suggested that administrative organisations and administrative systems rtnould be continuously adapted to the environmental changes and should also facilitate c:lienale or citizen involvement in adrniriisarativc processes to improve admitaistrative effectiveness. Check Your Progress 1 Note : i ) Use the space below for your answer. ii) Check your answer with the answer given at the end of this unit.
i ) Ucscrihc the n~i~jui Qiewpointsof Philadelphia Conference.

New Public Administration

........................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................
I

.....................................................................
.-;

..........

o...................,.............................................

",#.-. .

--.

.'6-...-.-".

&

7.3 FEATURES 6~NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

George Frederickson has summarised, in several of his writings, the main features of the new approach to Public Administration passionately advocated at Minnowbrook -conference and afterwards. According to him, social equity is the key concept stressed as an additional administrative value by the advocates of the new approach. He even titled one of his books as New Public Administration. According tb him the various features of the New Public Administration are as stared below.

7.3.1. Change and Administrative Responsiveness

,The social, political, economic and technological environments are changing rapidly.
Administrative organisations should, tirerefore, develop clear criteria by which the effectiveness and relevance of their decisions and actions can be judged in the changing context. They should also set, up an appropriate device and procedure ta effect appropriate change regularly within themselves so as to be responsive to the environment. In other words. organisational and operational flexibility or adaptability to meet environmental changes should be in-built in the administrative system and in each of its departments and agencies. Q

7.3.2 Rationality
In Puhlic Administration there is a g o d deal of emphasis on rationality as the main criterion for administrative dmisions and actions. But this rationality really refers to the

The Nature of Public

Administration

rationality of,bhe administrator and not as people would interpret it. The administrator needs to consult the citizens as well not only about what'is proposed to be done but also about what ought to be done and by whom.

7.3.3 Management- Worker Relations

It is true that human relations approach within an administrative organisation enhances both morale and productivity (efficiency) among employees but these are not to be end in themselves. The main objective should be the satisfaction of the citizens with the performance and attitudes of the administrative employees whose morale and productivity would have risen due to any human relations approach within an organisation.

7.3.4 Structures
There is 'a need Ear adopting a dynamic approach to organisational structure. ' Appropriate decentralisation of authority and modification of l~ierarchies of control and subordination. for instance, need continuous review so that the structure becomes relevant to the changing needs of environment. In other words, tllerc should hkalternativc structures to be choscrl from the above inventory of org;misations rather than one standardised orgnnisational structure based upon POSDCORB or other principles stressed by the advocates of the traditional approach to Public Administration. Small decentralised and flexible hieri!rchies. for instance, can be suitable for arlministraeive organisation's doncemid witl; programmes of intimate concern to the people or some of their sections.

7.3.5 Education-in public Administration

The subject of Public Administration has been enriched by several streams of knowlcdgc (concepts, ideas and insights). Heterogeneity is characteristic of this subject. The management approach, the human relations approach, political approach and public participative 01. choice approach continue to contribute to its growth. This is how it should be. Since public affairs, in which the government is engaged, are highly varied and complex, no single approach or theory or concept would be adequate to guide action.or understand its rationale.
~hedk Your Progress 2 Note : i) Use the space below For your answer. ii) Check your answer with those given at the end of this unit.

i) Explain the features of New Public Administration.

7.4 GOALS OF NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

New Public Administration literature has stressed four important goals - namely, relevance, values, equity and change.

7.4.1 Relevslrlce
Public Administration has always emphasised efficiency and economy. fublic Administration is criticised as having little to say about contemporary problems and issues. At the Minnowbrsok Conference, the participants focuscd attention on the need for policy-oriented Public Administration and emph~ised that Public Administration must explicitly deal with political. and normative implications of all atiministrative actions. Another aspect of relevance that was voiced was Public Administration htlowledge. At the Minnowbrook Conference, some of the following questions were raiscd:

a) What standards of decision do we usc to select?

New Public Adrninistratjon

b) Which questions ought to be studied and how to study them?

c) Who defines our questions and priorities for us?
d) To what extent are we aware of the social and moral implications of knowledge in Public Administration?
.c) What are the uses of Public Administration as a social and political science?
rff Does Public Administration presently yield knowledge useful to certain institutions in

society (usually the dominant ones) and not to othersd These are very&zXmbingquestions challenging the status quo in Public Administration.
'

7.4.2 Values
New Public Administration is explicitly normative. It rejects value concealing behaviouralism as well as procedural neutrality of traditional Public Administration. The participants at the Minnowbrook Conference, clearly espoused that value neutral Public Administration is impossible. They emphasised that public officials have to advocate the interests of the disadvantaged people.

Public Administration is indicated as an instrument of status guo, denying social justice to the less privileged groups. The leaders of New Public Administration emphasise the principle of social equity. Realisation of this principle should be the purpose of Public Administration. Frederickson himself explains the concept of social equity much more boldly when says: "A Public, Administration which fails to work for changes, which trier3_toredress the deprivation of minorities, qill likely be eventually used to repress thosc ni~~lt)rities". Client-fodus . administration is a major goal of New Public Administration. Other goals are debureaucratisatioh, democratic decision-making and decentralisation of administrative process in the interest of more,effectiveand humane delivery of public services.

Achievement of social equity requires promotion of change by the public administrators. Change is necessary to prevent Public Administration from coming under thc dominance ol' powerful interest groups. New public administratqrs should regard change as a constant fact of administrative life. In conclusion, what'the New Public Administration movement focused was that the administrator should be given less "generic" and more "public" than his predecessor, less "descriptive" and more '?prescript.ive", less "institution oriented" and more "client-impact .oriented", less "neutral" and more "normative", and 'it is hoped, no less scientific. v II ? ' Cheek Your Progress 3 Note: i) Use the spacehelow for your a*swer. ii) Check your answer with those given at the end of the unit.

i) Explain the goals of New public Administration.

The Nalum ofhbllc Admlnirtrallw,

+ z 7.5 COMMENTS ON NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION _ I _ C

According to Alan Campbell many of the issues bmught lo thc surface vigorously by advocates of New Public Administration were not new. These have been raised by otller" schoiars'from time to time. But these have been raised by proponents of New Public Administration very forcefully and with a strong commitment to social ch~wge. Their f socid strong emphasis on citizen's participation in decision-making, on normative value o equity, and human relations approach oriented largely to service to people is' once'again a reminder a h u t the need for reorientation of theory and practice of Pu biic Adnlinistntion. Dwight Waldo, in his book titled g6Etaterp~isa uf Public Administsstion (6980)"has New Public ~drniniseation proiects winled out . - three pcrspeceivcs cIearly--client (citizen)oriented bureaucracy, representative bureaucracy and pcople's participation. .I'hc~t public perspectives if woven into Public Administration appropriately wotlkl lerlcl ta demwratise it even more than before.
I

in the Xnternatlunrtl Journal of Carter and Duffey, writing on New Public Adrn~inistration Public Adminishalion, (19841, have expressed doubt whether the objective af social equity is actually getting recognised as a well-established adrninis~rative objective or value in addition to the existing ones of efficiency, effectiveness and public accountability. The great disparities of wealth and income continue in' USA to a\large extent. Due to recent curtailment of government spending on social welfsc programme in USA the deprived sections of the people still do not have adequate access to all the requisite economic and social facilities for their substantial betterment. We are of the view that since in USA the main emphasis has been on free competition and individual initiative, adoption of social equity as a policy and ddininistrative objective is not an easy proposition. In course of time, perhaps the progress towards its adoption may become more encouraging due to social pressures. Recknr trends in the study and practice of Public.4dministration in several countries, both developed (e.g. France, Sweden and Britain) and developing (e.g., lradia, Pakistan1 idso, indicate similar revision and additions. The intensity and extent of the impaci of the trends however, vary from one country to the other, depending upon their respective historical heritages, national resources, character of political system, cultwall and demographic patterns and role of the state in national development. The impact is very we& in some countries at one extreme and very strong at the other due to their differing nationd profiles. On the whole, these trends indicate: ' a) growing emphasis on social equity in puh!ic policies and administrative actions;
b) devising of instihtional arrangements ro facilitate increased public participation in administrative processes (i.e. decision-making, operations, etc.) at local and grassmot levels;

'

c) strengthening of political direction of administration as wall as of administrative accountability to the politiqal authorities within the government; d) adoption of innovative (new) types of organisations as well as of modm management pra&tices,and techniques and technologies to raise the adminiswtivc capability ( i a efficiency and effectiveness) to deal with highly diverse, complex end numcmus governmental tasks.

el growth of unionism among the public personnel (government emplayees) of various

grades and W i n g of organisedarrangwents for government-employas consultatio~ md negoh:?tiow as well as for-arbitration of disputes. Because of thssb t W s in administrative-Qstems?the scow of U l e swdy of& subject d Public Admhistratlon hhs increased considerably. Moreover, the study h no longer content with the dacription and loalysis of administrative phenomena, polides, organisations and

processes. I t is also becc~mingincreasingly nolmative as it now deals with qklestions of social equity orientation. democratic orientation. ethical behaviom and citizen's within continuously expanding ;administrative systems. Besides, it is also beginning to he incre;~singlycomparative as it now examines and conceptualises the administrative policies and drganisations and operations in various national environments comprising severi~laspects - political, social, economic, demographic, physical and kchnologicnl. In short. the New Puhlic Admiriistration. both in practice and theory 'tends to be _cy~nprc.liensivr Gisckpi, descriptive-cum-normative in character and comparative besides 'multi-clisciplinary in substance. ; . * t k',l~e,ck-your Prngress 4 Note : i ) Usc the space below for your ansvmb. i i ) Check your answers with tliosc giver1 ;it the end of the unit.
i ) Explain Waldo's cornnients oti N e w Public Adtninistration.

-. . - . . . . .

New ~ u h l i c Administration

~ i Explain ) ncw trends in Public i\dmir~istration.

7.6 LET US SUM UP

'

In this unit, we have examined the significance and the contcxr of N e a Public Administration, We have also examined the main features of' New Public Administration. The comments on New Public Administration and the influence of this concept on ncw developments in Public Administration are also discussed.

7.7 KEY WORDS

Administrative Accountability : A$countability yf the junior about their decisions and actions to the seniors-within the bureaucracy, and accountability of the executive branch of the 'government to the legislature. Administrative Capability : Ability of the administrative arrn.of government to perform or achieve its objectives. Administrative Effectiveness : The degree or extent of objective/goal achievement by an organisat ion

The Nature of Public

Administration

,idrninislr;ltivf Emciencv : The riltitrot'o~ti)~t to input in

ikfl

~rganihalion.

Orgiraisational Equity : Fair tle;~lto all the employees, with particular artontion at lower I ~ v c I \ of' ;In orpunr\ation. tlclivcry of sprviccs and goods by the ndminihtration shou)d he SociitI Equity : directly rcl:~tctl 11~c~l\ of. privileged people on iI priority bi~sih.

7.8 SOME USEFUL ROOKS

Avasthi & Maheshwari, 1985. Public Administration, Chapter-2 6% 3;l Lakshmi Narnin Aggarwal .: Agra. Bhattacharya, 1987. Public Administration, Structure, ~ o f x s and s &ha viour, Chapter- 1: The ,World Press Pvt. Ltd. : Calcutta. Marini Frank, 1971. Towards a New public Administration, the Minnowbrook prescriptive; Scranton, pa : Chandler.
-

7.9 ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS EXERCISES

Check Your Progress 1 i) See Sub-Scction 7.2.2 Check Your Progress 2 i) See Section 7.3
' i)

Check Your Progress 3 See Section 7.4 ji) See Section 7.4

Check Your Progress 4 i ) See Section 7.5 ii) See Section 7.2