International Catholic Migration Commison V

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

International Catholic Migration Commison v. Calleja GR no.

85750 September 28, 1990 ICMC was one of those accredited by the Philippine government to operate the refugee processing center in Morong, Bataan. That comes from an argument between the Philippine government and the United Nations High Commissioner for refugees for eventual resettlement to other countries was to be established in Bataan. ICMC was duly registered with the United Nations Economic and Social Council and enjoys consultative status. As an international organization rendering voluntary and humanitarian services in the Philippines, its activities are parallel to those of the international committee for migration and the international of the red cross. On July 14,1986, Trade Unions of the Philippines and Allied for certification with the then Ministry of Labor and Employment a petition for certification election among the rank and file members employed by ICMC. The latter opposed the petition on the ground that it is an international organization registered with the United Nations and hence, enjoys diplomatic immunity. The Med-Arbiter sustained ICMC and dismissed the petition for each of jurisdiction. On appeal by TUPAS, Director Calleja, reversed the Med-arbiters decision and ordered the immediate conduct of a certification election. ICMC then sought the immediate dismissal of the TUPAS petition for certification election involving the immunity expressly granted but the same was denied. With intervention of department of foreign affairs who was legal interest in the outcome of this case, the second division gave due to the ICMC petition and required the submittal of memoranda by the parties. ISSUE: GR # 85750- the ICMC case: Whether or not the grant of diplomatic privileges and immunities to ICMC extends to immunity from the application of Philippine labor laws. RULING: The grant of diplomatic privileges and immunities to ICMC extends to immunity from the application of Philippine labor laws, because it is clearly necessitated by their international character and respective purposes which is to avoid the danger of partiality and interference by the host country in their internal workings. Employees are not without recourse whenever there are disputes to be settled because each specialized agency shall make provision for appropriate modes of settlement of disputes out of contracts or other disputes of private character to which the specialized agency is a party.

Moreover, pursuant to article IV of memorandum of abuse of privilege by ICMC, the government is free to withdraw the privileges and immunities accorded. Wherefore, petition granted in ICMC case, the petition was dismissed.

You might also like