Kepler's 3-Point Problem
Kepler's 3-Point Problem
(28.1.1)
As stated in An Introduction to Mechanics, Daniel Kleppner and Robert Kolenkow, McGraw-Hill, 1973, p 401.
unsolved problems in celestial mechanics became the experimental laboratory for the discovery of new mathematics.
m1 m2 m1 + m2
(28.3.1)
that is acted on by an external central gravitational force. Once we solve for the motion of the reduced body in this equivalent one-body problem, we can then return to the real twobody problem and solve for the actual motion of the two original bodies. The reduced mass was introduced in Section 10.7 of these notes. That section used similar but different notation from that used in this chapter. Consider the gravitational force between two bodies with masses m1 and m2 as shown in Figure 28.1.
is the unit vector pointing from body 2 to body 1, so that between the bodies, and r ! r=r r
(28.3.2)
Figure 28.2 Coordinate system for the two-body problem. The force on body 1 (due to the interaction of the two bodies) can be described as
! mm = !G 1 2 2 r . F1, 2 = ! F1, 2 r r
(28.3.3)
Recall that Newtons Third Law requires that the force on body 2 is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force on body 1,
! ! F1, 2 = !F2,1 .
Newtons Second Law can be applied individually to the two bodies:
(28.3.4)
(28.3.5)
(28.3.6)
(28.3.7)
! F2,1
! d 2r2 = 2 . m2 dt
(28.3.8)
Subtracting the expression in Equation (28.3.8) from that in Equation (28.3.7) gives
! F1, 2
! ! ! d 2r1 d 2r2 d 2r ! = 2 ! 2 = 2 . m1 m2 dt dt dt
! F2,1
(28.3.9)
Using Newtons Third Law as given in Equation (28.3.4), Equation (28.3.9) becomes
! ! ! 1 1 " d 2r F1, 2 # + $= 2 . % m1 m2 & dt
(28.3.10)
1 1 1 = + , m1 m2
Equation (28.3.10) becomes
(28.3.11)
! F1, 2
! d 2r = 2 dt ! ! d 2r F1, 2 = 2 dt
(28.3.12)
no external forces acting on the reduced body, and angular momentum is constant about the origin because the only force is directed towards the origin, and hence the torque about the origin due to that force is zero (the vector from the origin to the reduced body is anti-parallel to the force vector and sin ! = 0 ). Since angular momentum is constant, the orbit of the reduced body lies in a plane with the angular momentum vector pointing perpendicular to this plane. Choose polar coordinates ( r , ! ) for the reduced body (see Figure 28.3), where r is the distance of the reduced body from the central point that is now taken as the origin, ! is the angle that the reduced body makes with respect to a! chosen direction, and which . increases positively in the counterclockwise direction, and Fgrav = ! F1, 2 r
Figure 28.3 Coordinate system for the orbit of the reduced body. Since the force is conservative, the potential energy with choice of zero reference point U (!) = 0 is given by
U (r ) = ! G m1 m2 . r
(28.4.1)
The total energy E is constant, and the sum of the kinetic energy and the potential energy is
E= 1 2 G m1 m2 v ! . 2 r
(28.4.2)
The kinetic energy term, v 2 / 2 , has the reduced mass and the relative speed v of the two bodies. The velocity is cylindrical coordinates is given by (add link)
! , + vtan! v = vrad r v = vrad + vtan
2 2 2
(28.4.3)
(28.4.4)
The magnitude of the angular momentum with respect to the center of mass is
L = r vtan = r 2 d! . dt
(28.4.5)
! ! F = a !G m1m2 r2
2 # d 2r # d" & & . = % 2 ! r% ( ( r r ( % dt $ ' dt $ '
(28.5.1)
Note that the motion is no longer circular, the radius is not constant so there is a term in the radial acceleration d 2 r / dt 2 along with the usual centripetal acceleration term ! r ( d" / dt )2 . Setting the components equal, using the constant of motion
L = r 2 ( d! / dt ) and rearranging,
d 2r L2 Gm1m2 . 2 = ! dt r3 r2
(28.5.2)
What we will do is use the same substitution u = 1/ r and change the independent variable from t to r , using the chain rule twice, since Equation (28.5.2) is a second-order equation. That is, the first time derivative is
dr dr du dr du d! = = . dt du dt du d! dt
(28.5.3)
From r = 1/ u we have dr / du = !1/ u 2 . Combining with the angular velocity d! / dt = L / r 2 in terms of L and u , d! / dt = L u 2 / , Equation (28.5.3) becomes
dr 1 du Lu 2 du L =" 2 =" , dt u d! d!
Taking the second derivative with respect to t ,
d 2 r d " dr # d " dr # d! = $ %= $ % dt 2 dt & dt ' d! & dt ' dt d 2u L " L # = ( 2 $ u2 % d! & ' =( d 2u 2 L2 u . d! 2 2
(28.5.4)
(28.5.5)
(28.5.6)
Gm1m2 d 2u + u = . d! 2 L2
(28.5.7)
Equation (28.5.7) is mathematically equivalent to the Harmonic Oscillator Equation with a constant term. The solution consists of two parts: the angle-independent solution
u0 =
Gm1m2 L2
(28.5.8)
(28.5.9)
where A and ! 0 are constants determined by the form of the orbit. The expression in Equation (28.5.8) is the inhomogeneous solution and represents a circular orbit. The expression in Equation (28.5.9) is the homogeneous solution (as hinted by the subscript) and must have two independent constants. Define
r0 ! L2 / G m1 m2 .
(28.5.10)
This is called the semilatus rectum. Then u0 = 1 / r0 and we can write the solution to Equation (28.5.7) as the sum of the inhomogeneous (Eq. (28.5.8)) and homogenous (Eq. (28.5.9)) pieces 7
u = u0 + uH =
r0 r= . 1 + r0 A cos(! " ! 0 )
(28.5.11)
! = 1 + 2 Er0 2 / L2 = 1 + 2 EL2 / (G m1 m2 )2
(28.5.12)
a quantity called eccentricity. Choose ! 0 = " then cos(! " # ) = " cos(! ) . Thus Equation (28.5.11) can be written in the form r0 r= . (28.5.13) 1 ! " cos# The two constants of the motion in terms of r0 and ! are
L = ( G m1 m2 r0 ) E= 2 r0
1 2
G m1 m2 (! 2 " 1)
(28.5.14)
The orbit equation as given in Equation (28.5.13) is a general conic section and is perhaps somewhat more familiar in Cartesian coordinates. Let x = r cos! and y = r sin ! , with r 2 = x 2 + y 2 . The orbit equation can be rewritten as
r = r0 + ! r cos" .
(28.5.15)
(28.5.16)
(28.5.17)
After rearranging terms, Equation (28.5.17) is the general expression of a conic section with axis on the x -axis,
x 2 (1 ! " 2 ) ! 2 " x r0 + y 2 = r0 2
(28.5.18)
(we now see that the dotted axis in Figure 28.3 can be taken to be the x -axis). For a given r0 > 0 , corresponding to a given nonzero angular momentum as in Equation (28.5.10), there are four cases determined by the value of the eccentricity. Case 1: When ! = 0 , E = Emin < 0 and r = r0 . Equation (28.5.18) is the equation for a circle,
x 2 + y 2 = r0 2
(28.5.19)
Case 2: When 0 < ! < 1 , Emin < E < 0 and Equation (28.5.18) describes an ellipse,
y 2 + A x2 ! B x = k
(28.5.20)
where A > 0 and k is a positive constant. (Appendix 17.C shows how this expression may be expressed in the more traditional form involving the coordinates of the center of the ellipse and the semimajor and semiminor axes.) Case 3: When ! = 1 , E = 0 and Equation (28.5.18) describes a parabola,
y 2 r0 ! . x= 2r0 2
(28.5.21)
(28.5.22)
(28.6.1)
The total energy is still the same, but our interpretation has changed;
E = K eff + U eff 1 ! dr " L2 G m1 m2 , = $ % + # 2 2 & dt ' 2 r r
2
(28.6.2)
where the effective kinetic energy K eff associated with the one-dimensional motion is
K eff 1 ! dr " = # $ . 2 % dt &
2
(28.6.3)
The graph of U eff as a function of r = r / r0 , where r0 as given in Equation (28.5.10), is shown in Figure 28.4. The upper curve (red, if you can see this in color) is proportional to L2 / (2 r 2 ) ! 1 / 2r 2 . The lower blue curve is proportional to !Gm1m2 / r ! !1/ r . The sum U eff is represented by the green curve. The minimum value of U eff is at r = r0 , as will be shown analytically below. The vertical scale is in units of !U eff (r0 ).
Figure 28.4 Graph of effective potential energy. Whenever the one-dimensional kinetic energy is zero, K eff = 0 , the energy is equal to the effective potential energy,
E = U eff = L2 G m1 m2 . ! 2 2 r r
(28.6.4)
Recall that the potential energy is defined to be the negative integral of the work done by the force. For our reduction to a one-body problem, using the effective potential, we will introduce an effective force such that
B B ! ! U eff , B ! U eff , A = ! # F eff " dr = ! # Freff dr A A
(28.6.5)
10
The fundamental theorem of calculus (for one variable) then states that the integral of the derivative of the effective potential energy function between two points is the effective potential energy difference between those two points,
B
dU eff dr dr A
(28.6.6)
Comparing Equation (28.6.6) to Equation (28.6.5) shows that the radial component of the effective force is the negative of the derivative of the effective potential energy,
Freff = ! dU eff dr
(28.6.7)
The effective potential energy describes the potential energy for a reduced body moving in one dimension. (Note that the effective potential energy is only a function of the variable r and is independent of the variable ! ). There are two contributions to the effective potential energy, and the total radial component of the force is
F
eff r
(28.6.8)
(28.6.9)
(28.6.10)
(28.6.11)
With this nomenclature, lets review the four cases presented in Section 17.3. Case 1: Circular Orbit E = Emin
11
The lowest energy state, Emin , corresponds to the minimum of the effective potential energy, Emin = (U eff )min . When this condition is satisfied the effective kinetic energy is zero since E = K eff + U eff . The condition
K eff 1 ! dr " = # $ =0 2 % dt &
2
(28.6.12)
implies that the radial velocity is zero, so the distance r from the central point is a constant. This is the condition for a circular orbit. The condition for the minimum of the effective potential energy is dU eff L2 G m1m2 . (28.6.13) 0= =! 3 + dr r r2 We can solve Equation (28.6.13) for r ,
L2 , r ! r0 = G m1m2
(28.6.14)
reproducing Equation (28.5.10). Case 2: Elliptic Orbit Emin < E < 0 When K eff = 0 , the mechanical energy is equal to the effective potential energy, E = U eff , as in Equation (28.6.4). Having dr / dt = 0 corresponds to a point of closest or furthest approach as seen in Figure 28.4. This condition corresponds to the minimum and maximum values of r for an elliptic orbit,
E= L2 G m1 m2 ! 2 r 2 r
(28.6.15)
G m1 m2 L2 r + r! =0 E 2 E
2
(28.6.16)
(28.6.17)
(28.6.18)
Recall from Equation (28.5.12), the square root is the eccentricity ! , given by
! = 1 + 2 Er0 2 / L2 = 1 + 2 EL2 / (G m1 m2 )2
Thus Equation (28.6.18) becomes
r=" G m1 m2 (1 ! ). 2E
(28.6.19)
(28.6.20)
(28.6.21)
="
Substituting the last expression in (28.6.21) into Equation (28.6.20) gives an expression for the points of closest and furthest approach,
r= r0 (1 ! ) . 1" ! 2
(28.6.22)
(28.6.23)
(28.6.24)
13
The effective potential energy, as given in Equation (28.6.1), approaches zero ( U eff ! 0 ) when the distance r approaches infinity ( r ! " ). Since the total energy is zero, when r ! " the kinetic energy also approaches zero, K eff ! 0 . This corresponds to a parabolic orbit (see Equation (28.5.21)). Recall that in order for a body to escape from a planet, the body must have a total energy E = 0 (we set U eff = 0 at infinity). This escape velocity condition corresponds to a parabolic orbit. For a parabolic orbit, the body also has a distance of closest approach. This distance rpar can be found from the condition
E = U eff = G m1 m2 L2 ! =0. 2 2 r r
(28.6.25)
(28.6.26)
the fact that the minimum distance to the origin (the focus of a parabola) is half the semilatus rectum is a well-known property of a parabola. Case 4: Hyperbolic Orbit E > 0 When E > 0 , in the limit as r ! " the kinetic energy is positive, K eff > 0 . This corresponds to a hyperbolic orbit (see Equation (28.5.22)). The condition for closest approach is similar to Equation (28.6.15) except that the energy is now positive. This implies that there is only one positive solution to the quadratic Equation (28.6.16), the distance of closest approach for the hyperbolic orbit
rhyp = r0 . 1+ !
(28.6.27)
The constant r0 is independent of the energy and from Equation (28.5.12) as the energy of the reduced body increases, the eccentricity increases, and hence from Equation (28.6.27), the distance of closest approach gets smaller.
Choose a coordinate system as we did for the reduction of the two-body problem (Figure 28.5).
Figure 28.5 Center of mass coordinate system. The center of mass of the system is given by
! ! ! m1 r1 + m2 r2 . R cm = m1 + m2
(28.7.1)
! ! Let r1! be the vector from the center of mass to body 1 and r2! be the vector from the center of mass to body 2. Then, by the geometry in Figure 28.5,
! ! ! ! ! ! r = r1 " r2 = r1! " r2
(28.7.2)
and hence
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! m1 r1 + m2 r2 m2 (r1 ! r2 ) ! r1" = r1 ! R cm = r1 ! = = r. m1 + m2 m1 + m2 m1
(28.7.3)
! ! ! = " r. r2 m2
(28.7.4)
Thus each body undergoes a motion about the center of mass in the same manner that the reduced body moves about the central point given by Equation (28.5.13). The only difference is that the distance from either body to the center of mass is shortened by a factor / mi . When the orbit of the reduced body is an ellipse, then the orbits of the two bodies are also ellipses, as shown in Figure 28.6.
15
Figure 28.6 The elliptical motion of bodies under mutual gravitation. When one mass is much smaller than the other, for example m1 ! m2 , then the reduced mass is approximately the smaller mass,
m1 m2 mm ! 1 2 = m1 m1 + m2 m2
(28.7.5)
The center of mass is located approximately at the position of the larger mass, body 2 of mass m2 . Thus body 1 moves according to
! ! ! r1! = r " r m1
and body 2 is approximately stationary,
(28.7.6)
! ! m ! ! ! =" r" 1 r #0 r2 m2 m2
(28.7.7)
16
(28.8.1)
and the eccentricity must fall within the range 0 " ! < 1 . These orbits are either circles or ellipses. Note the elliptic orbit law is only valid if we assume that there is only one central force acting. We are ignoring the gravitational interactions due to all the other bodies in the universe, a necessary approximation for our analytic solution. Equal Area Law The radius vector from the sun to a planet sweeps out equal areas in equal time. Using analytic geometry, the sum of the areas of the triangles in Figure 28.7 is given by
"A =
in the limit of small "! .
(28.8.2)
Figure 28.7 Keplers equal area law. The average rate of the change of area, !A , in time, !t , is given by
"A =
(28.8.3)
17
(28.8.4)
Recall that according to Equation (28.A.6) (reproduced below as Equation (28.8.5)), the angular momentum is related to the angular velocity d! / dt by
d! L = dt r 2
and Equation (28.8.4) is then
(28.8.5)
dA L = . dt 2
(28.8.6)
Since L and are constants, the rate of change of area with respect to time is a constant. This is often familiarly referred to by the expression: equal areas are swept out in equal times (see Keplers Laws at the beginning of this chapter). Period Law The period of revolution T of a planet about the sun is related to the major axis A of the ellipse by T 2 = k A3 where k is the same for all planets. When Kepler stated his period law for planetary orbits based on observation, he only noted the dependence on the larger mass of the sun. Since the mass of the sun is much greater than the mass of the planets, his observation is an excellent approximation. Equation (28.8.6) can be rewritten in the form
2 dA =L. dt
(28.8.7)
orbit
2 dA = ! L dt
0
(28.8.8)
Area =
orbit
"
dA = ! ab
(28.8.9)
where a is the semimajor axis and b is the semiminor axis. Thus we have
T= 2 ! ab . L
(28.8.10)
T2 =
4! 2 2 a 2b 2 . L2
(28.8.11)
In Appendix 17.B, the angular momentum is given in terms of the semimajor axis and the eccentricity by Equation (28.B.10). Substitution for the angular momentum into Equation (28.8.11) yields
T2 = 4! 2 2 a 2 b2 . Gm1 m2 a(1 " # 2 )
(28.8.12)
In Appendix 17.B, the semi-minor axis is given by Equation (28.B.22) which upon substitution into Equation (28.8.12) yields
T2 = 4! 2 2 a 3 . Gm1 m2
(28.8.13)
Using Equation (28.3.1) for reduced mass, the square of the period of the orbit is proportional to the semi-major axis cubed,
T2 = 4! 2 a 3 . G (m1 + m2 )
(28.8.14)
19
a) Find an expression for the speed v0 of the satellite when it is in the circular orbit. b) Find an expression for the mechanical energy E0 of the satellite when it is in the circular orbit. Take U (r ) ! 0 as r ! " . As a result of an orbital maneuver the satellite trajectory is changed to an elliptical orbit. This is accomplished by firing a rocket for a short time interval thus increasing the tangential speed of the satellite. The apogee (farthest distance from earth) of the elliptical orbit is three times the closest approach (perigee),
ra = 3rp = 3r0 .
(In the figure, the small red circle represents the earth.) c) Use conservation of energy and angular momentum for the elliptic orbit to find an expression for the speed of the satellite, vp , immediately after the rocket has finished firing.
Solution:
20
a) This preliminary part should be found directly from Newtons Second Law and the Universal Law of Gravitation. The magnitude of the acceleration for the circular orbit is 2 v0 / r0 , and so
ms
2 v0 mm = G s2 e r0 r0
v0 = Gme / r0 .
b) The total mechanical energy is the sum of the kinetic energy and the gravitational potential energy,
E0 = !G
ms me 1 2 + msv0 r0 2
1 mm =! G s e. 2 r0
c) Since rp = r0 , and ra = 3r0 , the condition that angular momentum is constant
rp vp = ra va becomes r0 vp = (3r0 )va , so va = vp / 3 . The condition that the mechanical
21
28.9.2 Example Halleys Comet The equation for any orbit in an inverse square gravitational field is given by
r= r0 1 # ! cos "
(28.9.1)
where
r0 =
L2 . Gm1m2
(28.9.2)
In Equation (28.9.2), L is the angular momentum, = m1m2 (m1 + m2 ) is the reduced mass, and ! is the eccentricity of the orbit. When 0 < ! < 1 , the orbit is an ellipse (in the above figure, ! = 3/ 5 ). The period, T , depends only on the length of the major axis, A , of the ellipse, which is given by
# 2T 2G (m1 + m2 ) $ A=% & !2 ( )
1/ 3
(28.9.3)
. Halleys Comet is in an elliptic orbit about the sun. The eccentricity of the orbit is ! = 0.967 and the period is T = 76 y . The mass of the sun is msun = 1.99 !1030 kg . The mass of Halleys Comet is negligible compared to the sun. a) Using this data, determine the distance of Halleys Comet at closest approach rp (perihelion) to the sun, and furthest distance ra (aphelion) from the sun. b) What is the speed vp of Halleys Comet when it is closest to the sun? Solution:
22
Before diving into the numerical calculations, lets do some preliminary math. First, note that when mcomet ! msun (note that mcomet is not given in the problem), m1 + m2 ! msun and
(28.9.4)
(28.9.5)
(28.9.6)
As a quick check, note that rp + ra = A , the major axis. Next, anticipating part (b), we expect to use angular momentum considerations. At perihelion, the comet must be moving perpendicular to the vector from the sun to the comet, and so the magnitude of the angular momentum in terms of vp , rp and mcomet is
L = mcomet vp rp .
(28.9.7)
Combining with Equation (28.9.2) (with m1 = msun , m2 = mcomet , or vice versa) and the simplification for as given in Equation (28.9.4) and solving for vp gives
2 Gr0 msun mcomet Gr0 msun G (1 + ! )msun vp = . = = = mcomet rp mcomet rp rp rp
(28.9.8)
The mass of the comet does indeed drop out of this problem if mcomet ! msun . Its time to do the numbers. The calculations presented here were done by computer, keeping almost arbitrary precision in the intermediate calculations, and rounded to three figures (even though the period is given to only two figures). For the Newtonian gravitational constant, G = 6.67 "10!11 N # m 2 # kg !2 was used.
23
a) Since the major axis A is used for determining both rp and ra , find that quantity first. From Equation (28.9.3), with m1 + m2 = msun ,
1/ 3
# 2 (76 y ) 3.16 )107 s * y "1 )(6.67 )10"11 N * m 2 * kg "2 )( 1.99 )1030 kg )$ & =% % & !2 ' ( 12 = 5.37 )10 m
from which Equation (28.9.6) gives
rp = 8.86 !1010 m, ra = 5.28 !1012 m .
1/ 3
(28.9.9)
(28.9.10)
These results are roughly half and thirty times the earth-sun distance, respectively; rp is roughly the distance from the sun to the ex-planet Pluto. If fact, the period of Halleys Comet is roughly 1/ 8 the period of Plutos orbit, consistent with Equation (28.9.3). A graph of the orbit is shown here:
The tiny dot (red, if viewed in color) represents the sun and is not to scale; a circle representing the sun to scale on this scale is too small to be seen ( rp > 100 Rsun ). b) Equation (28.9.8) then gives, with the result in Equation (28.9.10),
vp = G (1 + ! )msun = 5.43 #104 m $ s "1 . rp
(28.9.11)
This is essentially (but of course smaller than) the escape velocity from the sun. In fact 1 2 2 / vescape = (1 + ! ) , which is 0.9835 for the eccentricity of its not too hard to show that vp 2 this orbit.
24
28.9.3 Example Lunar Orbit Collision A lunar mapping satellite of mass ms is in a circular orbit around the moon, and the orbit has radius R0 = 1.5 Rm where Rm is the radius of the moon. A repair robot of mass mr < ms is injected into that orbit, but due to a NASA sign error it orbits in the opposite direction. The two collide and stick together in a useless metal mass. The point of this problem is to find whether they create more junk orbiting the moon or crash into the lunar surface. The mass of the moon is denoted by mm . The universal gravitational constant is denoted by G.
a. What is the initial orbital velocity of the mapping satellite, v0 ? Express your answer in terms of R0 , mm , and G. b. What is the speed of the space junk (satellite and robot) immediately after the collision? Write it as f v0 , where you must determine the number f . Express your answer in terms of ms and mr . c. After the collision, the orbit of the space junk has changed. Use conservation of energy and angular momentum to find an equation for the closest approach rp of the space junk to the moon. d. Solve your equation in part c for the number f assuming that the closest approach rp = Rm , the space junk hits the moon. Solution: a) The speed of the mapping satellite undergoing uniform circular motion can be found from the force equation,
Gms mm R0 2
=!
ms v0 2 R0
(28.9.12)
25
So the speed is
v0 = Gmp / R0
(28.9.13)
ms v0 ! mr v0 = ( ms + mr )v f .
Thus the speed after the collision is
vf = ms ! mr ms + mr v0 = fv0 ,
(28.9.14)
(28.9.15)
where the ratio of speed after the collision to the speed before the collision is given by the number
f =
vf v0
ms ! mr . ms + mr
(28.9.16)
(28.9.18)
26
(28.9.19)
(28.9.20)
Eq. (28.9.20) implies that v p = R0 fv0 / rp which we can substitute into Eq. (28.9.18) yielding
1 2 2 Gm p 1 ! R0 fv0 " Gm p . f v0 # = $ # % % R0 2$ r r 2 p p & '
2
(28.9.21)
(28.9.22)
If we assume that at the closest approach rp = Rm , the space junk hits the moon. Then using the values rp = Rm , v0 = Gm p / R0 , and R0 = (3 / 2) Rm , Eq. (28.9.22) becomes
Gm p ! 9 RM 2 " ! 2 1 " f = Gm # $1 # % $ %. p 3RM & 4 RM 2 ' & 3RM RM '
2
(28.9.23)
(28.9.24)
27
U effective =
L2 1 + kr 2 . 2 2 r 2
Find the radius and the energy for the motion with the lowest energy. What type of motion does this correspond to? If the energy is slightly greater than the lowest energy, what type of motion would that correspond to?
Solution: Taking the derivative of the effective potential with respect to the radius r and setting the derivative equal to zero at r0 ,
L2 + k r0 = 0 r03
1/ 4
k ! L2 " + # $ 2 % k &
28
For a slightly larger energy, the orbit will oscillate about the minimum radius. Although it takes a bit more work to show, and is not part of this problem, the orbit will be an ellipse with the origin at the center (not at a focus, as in a Keplerian orbit).
29
28.9.5 Example Effective Potential Energy A system of two particles with a reduced mass interacts via an attractive central force ! , where r is the relative distance between the two particles. The magnitude of F = !ar 3 r the angular momentum for the equivalent one particle problem about the origin is L . a) Find an expression for the effective potential energy and make a graph of the effective potential energy as a function of r . Find an expression for r that minimizes the effective potential energy. b) Indicate by a horizontal line on the graph sketch the total energy that would correspond to a constant relative distance r between the two particles. Find an expression for this energy. What type of motion does this correspond to for the equivalent one-particle problem? Solution: a) The potential energy associated with the given force, denoted U with no subscript, is given by
! ! ! U = ! $! F ( r " ) # d r " =
! r r0
r0
a r " 3 dr " =
a 4 ( r ! r04 ) 4
(28.9.25)
where r0 is the radius at which we choose to set the potential energy equal to zero. While we could choose any (finite) value for r0 , for the purposes of making the graph well choose r0 = 0 . The effective potential energy is then
U eff = U + L2 1 a 4 L2 1 . = r + 2 r2 4 2 r2
(28.9.26)
From Equation (28.9.26) we see that the effective potential has both an attractive part ( ! r 4 ) and the repulsive part ( ! !1/ r 2 ). A plot of U eff as a function of r , with, for graphing purposes, a = L = = 1 is shown below. Plots of U and the repulsive term are shown as well; U eff is the upper curve, blue if viewed in color.
30
Differentiating Equation (28.9.26) and setting the derivative equal to zero at r = rmin yields
ar
3 min
(28.9.27)
rmin
In the above plot, with a = L = = 1 , rmin = 1 , consistent with the graph. b) Using the value of rmin from (28.9.27) in Equation (28.9.26) yields
2/3
L2 ! L2 " + $ # 2 % a &
1/ 3
(28.9.28)
This value is shown as the black horizontal line in the plot below; with a = L = = 1 ,
rmin = 1 , U eff (rmin ) = 3/ 4 .
31
32
28.9.6 Example Transfer Orbit A space vehicle is in a circular orbit about the earth. The mass of the vehicle is ms and the radius of the orbit is 2 Re . It is desired to transfer the vehicle to a circular orbit of radius 4 Re . The mass of the earth is M e .
a) What is the difference in energy between the outer and inner circular orbits? b) An efficient way to accomplish the transfer is to use an elliptical orbit from point A at the inner circular orbit at to point B at the outer circular orbit (known as a Hohmann transfer orbit). This is accomplished by firing a rocket for a short time interval during each change of orbit thus increasing the tangential speed of the satellite. What velocity changes are required at the points of intersection, A and B ? c) Assume that the rocket burns fuel at a steady rate and the exhaust speed relative to the rocket is u . Using our early results for the rocket equation, how much fuel is burned at each of the rocket firings at the points of intersection, A and B ? Assume that before the firing at A , the mass of the rocket is m0 .
33
Solution: a) Because ms << m p , the reduced mass ! ms . The total mechanical energy is the sum of the kinetic and potential energies,
E = K +U = m M 1 ms v 2 ! G s e . 2 r
(28.9.29)
For a circular orbit, the orbital speed and orbital radius must be related by the radial component of Newtons Second Law
!G
We can rewrite Eq. (28.9.30) as
ms M e r2
= ! ms
v2 . r
(28.9.30)
1 1 m M ms v 2 = G s e . 2 2 r
Substituting Eq. (28.9.31) into Equation (28.9.29) gives
m M 1 m M 1 m M 1 E = G s e ! G s e = ! G s e = U (r ) . 2 r r 2 r 2
(28.9.31)
(28.9.32)
In moving from a circular orbit of radius 2 Re to an orbit of radius 4 Re , the total energy increases, as the energy becomes less negative. The change in energy is
b) The satellite must increase its speed at point A in order to move to the larger orbit radius and increase its speed again at point B to stay in a circular orbit. Denote the satellite speed at point A while in the circular orbit as v A, i and after the speed increase (a rocket burn) as v A, f . Similarly, denote the satellites speed when it first reaches point B as v B , i and the speed of the satellite in the circular orbit at point B as v B , f . The speeds v A, i and v B , f are given by Equation (28.9.31).
34
While the satellite is moving from point A to point B (that is, during the transfer, after the first burn and before the second), both mechanical energy and angular momentum are conserved. Conservation of energy relates the speeds and radii by
(28.9.34)
(28.9.35)
Substitution of Equation (28.9.35) into Equation (28.9.34) yields, after minor algebra, v A, f = Equation (28.9.31) gives v A, i = 1 G Me , vB, f = 2 Re 1 G Me . 4 Re (28.9.37) 2 G Me 1 GM e . , vB, i = 3 Re 6 Re (28.9.36)
(28.9.38)
and
# 1 1 & G Me !v B = v B , f " v B , i = % " . ( Re 6' $ 4
(28.9.39)
Note that at both points, the speed must increase. c) Recall from our rocket equation (add correct link W08D2 Worked Example Rocket Problem) that the change in the rocket speed is given by
$ ' m0 !vr " vr , f # vr ,0 = u ln & ) % m0 # !m f (
(28.9.40)
where the mass of the rocket after the burn is mr , f = m0 ! "m f with !m f > 0 the amount of fuel that is necessary to burn in order to increase the speed by !vr . We can write Eq. (28.9.40) as 35
(28.9.41)
e
We can now solve for !m f :
! "vr / u
m0 ! "m f m0
" !vr / u
(28.9.42)
!m f = m0 (1 " e
So for the first firing at point A we have that
).
(28.9.43)
!m f , A = m0 (1 " e
" !v A / u
(28.9.44)
where !v A is given by Eq. (28.9.38). The amount of fuel after the firing is then
m0, B = m0 e
! "v A / u
(28.9.45)
The amount of fuel burned during the second firing at point B is then
!m f , B = m0, B (1 " e
where !vB is given by Eq. (28.9.39).
" !v B / u
) = m0 e
" !v A / u
(1 " e
" !v B / u
(28.9.46)
36
Chapter 28 Appendices
28.A: Derivation of the Orbit Equation
Two presentations of the result of Equation (28.5.13)
(28.A.1)
The total energy E is constant, and the sum of the kinetic energy and the potential energy is
E= 1 2 G m1 m2 v ! . 2 r
(28.A.2)
The kinetic energy term, v 2 / 2 , has the reduced mass and the relative speed v of the two bodies. The velocity is cylindrical coordinates is given by (add link)
! , + vtan! v = vrad r v = vrad + vtan
2 2 2
(28.A.3)
(28.A.4)
The magnitude of the angular momentum with respect to the center of mass is
L = r vtan = r 2 d! . dt
(28.A.5)
We shall explicitly eliminate the ! dependence from Equation (28.A.4) by using our expression in Equation (28.A.5),
d! L . = dt r 2
The mechanical energy as expressed in Equation (28.A.4) then becomes
1 ! dr " 1 L2 G m1 m2 . E = $ % + # 2 & dt ' 2 r 2 r
2
(28.A.6)
(28.A.7)
Equation (28.A.7) is a separable differential equation involving the variable r as a function of time t and can be solved for the first derivative dr / dt ,
dr = dt 2 ! 1 L2 G m1 m2 " 2 + E # $ % . 2 r2 r & '
1
(28.A.8)
Instead of solving for the position of the reduced body as a function of time, we shall find a geometric description of the orbit by finding r (! ) . We first divide Equation (28.A.6) by Equation (28.A.8) to obtain
L d! d! r2 . = dt = 1 1 dr dr 2 2 2 "2# " 1 L G m1 m2 # + dt % & % E $ & 2 2 r r '( ' (
(28.A.9)
dr .
(28.A.10)
38
What follows involves a good deal of hindsight, allowing selection of convenient substitutions in the math in order to get a clean result. First, note the many factors of the reciprocal of r . Make the substitution u = 1/ r , du = !(1/ r 2 ) dr , with the result
d! = " L du . 1/ 2 2 2 # $ L 2 u + G m1 m2 u & %E" 2 ' (
(28.A.11)
Experience in evaluating integrals suggests that we make the absolute value of the factor multiplying u 2 inside the square root equal to unity. That is, multiplying numerator and denominator by 2 / L ,
d! = " du . (2 E / L " u + 2( G m1 m2 / L2 )u )1/ 2
2 2
(28.A.12)
As both a check and a motivation for the next steps, note that the left side (d! ) of Equation (28.A.12) is dimensionless, and so the right side must be. This means that the factor of G m1 m2 / L2 in the square root must have the same dimensions as u , or
length !1 ; so, define
r0 ! L2 / G m1 m2 .
(28.A.13)
a quantity we previously encountered in Eq. (28.5.10) called the semilatus rectum. The differential equation then becomes d! = " =" du (2 E / L " u 2 + 2u / r0 )1/ 2
2
du =" 2 (2 E / L + 1 / r0 2 " (u " 1 / r0 )2 )1/ 2 =" r0 du (2 Er0 / L + 1 " ( r0 u " 1)2 )1/ 2
2 2
(28.A.14)
! = 1 + 2 Er0 2 / L2
(28.A.15)
39
a quantity we also previously encountered (Eq. (28.5.12)) called the eccentricity. The last expression in is then
d! = " r0 du (# " ( r0 u " 1)2 )1/ 2
2
(28.A.16)
From here, well combine a few calculus steps, going immediately to the substitution r0 u # 1 = ! cos " , r0 du = #! sin " d" , yielding d! = " We can now integrate and find that "# sin $ d$ = d$ . (# 2 " # 2 cos 2 $ )1/ 2 (28.A.17)
(28.A.18)
We have a choice in selecting the constant, and if we pick ! = " $ # , ! = " + # , cos ! = # cos" , the result is
r= 1 r0 = u 1 # ! cos"
(28.A.19)
agreeing with our result in Equation (28.5.13). Note that if we chose the constant of integration to be zero, the result would be
r= 1 r0 = u 1 + ! cos"
(28.A.20)
which is the same trajectory reflected about the vertical axis in Figure 28.3, indeed the same as rotating by ! .
40
Figure 28.B.1 Ellipse. In Figure 28.B.1, let a denote the semimajor axis, b denote the semiminor axis and x0 denote the distance from the center of the ellipse to the origin of our coordinate system ( r ,! ) . We shall now express the parameters a , b and x0 in terms of the constants of the motion L , E , , m1 and m2 . The semimajor axis: See Equation (28.A.19) above. The major axis A = 2a is given by
A = 2 a = rmax + rmin
(28.B.1)
rmax = r (! = 0) =
r0 1" #
(28.B.2)
rmin = r (! = " ) =
r0 1+ #
(28.B.3)
(28.B.4)
The semilatus rectum r0 can be re-expressed in terms of the semimajor axis and the eccentricity,
r0 = a(1 ! " 2 ) .
(28.B.5)
We can now express the distance of nearest approach, Equation (28.B.3), in terms of the semimajor axis and the eccentricity,
rmin
(28.B.6)
rmax =
r0 1! "
(28.B.7)
Figure 17.B.2 shows the distances of nearest and furthest approach. Using our results for r0 and ! from Equations (17.3.12) and (17.3.13), we have for the semimajor axis
L2 1 a= Gm1 m2 (1 ! (1 + 2 E L2 / G m m 2 )) 1 2
(28.B.8)
=!
G m1 m2 2E
(28.B.9)
The angular momentum is related to the semilatus rectum r0 by Equation (17.3.12). Using Equation (28.B.5) for r0 , we can express the angular momentum (28.B.3) in terms of the semimajor axis and the eccentricity, L = Gm1 m2 r0 = Gm1 m2 a(1 ! " 2 ) . Note that (28.B.10)
42
(1 ! " 2 ) =
Gm1 m2 a
(28.B.11)
Location x0 of the center of the ellipse: From Figure 28.B.1, the distance from a focal point to the center of the ellipse is
x0 = rmax ! a .
(28.B.12)
(28.B.13)
x0 = ! a = "
The semi-minor axis: From Figure 28.B.1,
G m1 m2 2E
(1 + 2 E L2 / (G m1 m2 )2 ) .
(28.B.14)
b = ( rb 2 ! x0 2 ) where
(28.B.15)
rb =
which can be rewritten as
r0 , 1 # ! cos" b
(28.B.16)
rb # rb ! cos" b = r0 .
(28.B.17)
(28.B.18)
so that
rb = r0 + ! x0 .
(28.B.19)
43
x0
r0
into
(28.B.20)
The fact that rb = a is a well-known property of an ellipse reflected in the geometric construction, that the sum of the distances from the two foci to any point on the ellipse is a constant. Thus the semi-minor axis b becomes b = rb 2 ! x0 2 = a 2 ! " 2 a 2 = a 1 ! " 2 . Using Equation (28.B.11) for 1 " ! 2 , we have for the semi-minor axis (28.B.21)
b = aL2 / Gm1 m2 .
We can now use Equation (28.B.8) for a in the above expression, yielding
b = aL2 / Gm1 m2 = L ! G m1 m2 1 / Gm1 m2 = L ! 2E 2 E
(28.B.22)
(28.B.23)
Speeds at nearest and furthest distances: At nearest approach the velocity vector is tangent to the orbit, so the angular momentum is
L = rmin v p
(28.B.24)
(28.B.25)
44
Using Equation (28.B.10) for the angular momentum and Equation (28.B.6) for rmin , Equation (28.B.25) becomes vp = L = rmin
Gm1 m2 (1 ! " 2 )
a(1 ! " )2
va =
Gm1 m2 (1 ! " 2 )
a(1 + " )
(x ! x0 )
a2
y2 =1 b2
(28.C.1)
where the ellipse has axes parallel to the x and y coordinate axes, center at ( x0 , 0) , semimajor axis a and semiminor axis b . We rewrite Equation (28.5.18) as
x2 "
We next complete the square,
(28.C.2)
2" r0 " 2 r02 y2 r02 " 2 r02 x ! x+ + = + 1! "2 (1 ! " 2 )2 1 ! " 2 1 ! " 2 (1 ! " 2 )2
2
(28.C.3)
(28.C.4)
45
=1
(28.C.5)
( x ! " a )2 y 2 + 2 =1 a2 b
with semimajor axis
a= r0 , 1" ! 2
(28.C.6)
(28.C.7)
semiminor axis
b=
r0 1" !
2
= a 1" ! 2
(28.C.8)
(28.D.1)
These relations are not hard to derive in Cartesian coordinates; the derivations will not be reproduced here. As a check, however, note that the vector on the right side of the first 46
! ! ! ! ! ! relation is perpendicular to both a and b ! c . If a , b and c are non-coplanar, the common magnitude of the scalars in the second relation is the expression for the volume of a parallelepiped with the three vectors forming the sides.
Lets start with the known constant angular momentum,
! ! ! ! ! L = r !p = r ! v
(28.D.2)
and re-express this quantity in a way that will allow us to use Newtons Laws. Specifically, consider the velocity in terms of polar coordinates,
dr ! dr +r v= r dt dt
(28.D.3)
(28.D.4)
from which
! 1 L dr ! = 2 . r dt r
(28.D.5)
The advantage to this operation is that we now have an explicit scalar factor of 1/ r 2 , which can and should be related to the same factor that appears in Newtons Law of , Gravitation. However, in order to use that law, we need a vector relation involving r into both sides of Equation (28.D.5), yielding and so well cross r
! " r L dr ! #$r # % = 2 # r dt ' r & dr 1 ! d2 !" ! ( =( r % # L. $ dt Gm1m2 & dt 2 '
(28.D.6)
In the above, the first relation in Equation (28.D.1) was used to simplify the left side, and ! was used on the Newtons Law of Gravitation, in the form ( d 2r / dt 2 ) = !(Gm1m2 / r 2 )r right side. Note the cancellation of the factor of the reduced mass . Equation (28.D.6) may now be integrated to obtain
47
(28.D.7)
! ! is in the plane of the orbit, and L is where A is a constant vector. Since r ! perpendicular to the plane of the orbit, A must lie in the plane of the orbit, as indicated ! , and hence above. Further, by considering extreme points of the orbit, where v ! r ! ! ! , we see that at these points A is in the direction parallel to the major axis. v!L " r ! ! Since A is a constant vector, A must always be in this direction. By considering the ! vector A at perihelion (or at any point on the orbit of a circular orbit), we can see that the ! direction of A is that from the perihelion point to the focus; well need this result below, when we find the orbit equation. ! The magnitude of A is readily found by calculating
! ! !r " A2 = A ! A = r 2 1 ! ! ! ( v # L) + r Gm1m2 Gm1m2 ! ! ! ! ( v # L ) ! ( v # L ) .(28.D.8) 2
The first dot product is manifestly 1 . The middle term, the cross term, is found using the second relation in Equation (28.D.1),
(28.D.9)
! ! ! ! The third term is most easily evaluated by recalling that v ! L , so that v ! L = vL and ! ! ! ! ( v ! L ) " ( v ! L ) = v 2 L2 . Combining, we see that
A2 = 1 ! = 1+ = 1+ 2 1 2 1 L + v 2 L2 2 Gm1m2 r (Gm1m2 ) " 1 2 Gm1m2 % 2 L2 v ! ' r & (Gm1m2 )2 $ #2 2 L2 E = ( 2. (Gm1m2 )2 (28.D.10)
! Thus, the constant vector A is directed along the major axis and has magnitude equal to the eccentricity. ! ! The orbit equation is now found algebraically by taking the dot product of A and r ;
48
! ! ! !r # A ! r = Ar cos" = r
1 ! ! ! r ! ( v $ L) . Gm1m2
(28.D.11)
The first term is merely the magnitude r of the position vector. The second term, ! , is repeating the calculation of Equation (28.D.9) with r instead of r
1 L2 = r0 , Gm1m2
with the result
Ar cos! = " r cos! = r # r0 .
(28.D.12)
(28.D.13)
(28.D.14)
! It should be noted that what we call the vector A is a negative scalar multiple of the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector (yes, it took three people to come up with this). Specifically, the L-R -L vector is in many sources given as
! ! ! ! ! r A LRL = p ! L " Gm1m2 = " Gm1m2 A . r
(28.D.15)
! ! ! Our choice of the form for A allows A = ! and the direction of A to lead to
Equation (28.D.11) without introduction of extra minus signs.
49
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.
50