0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views3 pages

Algebra Homework Set 8 Hung Tran. 9.4.2.c Reducing Mod 2

This document contains student Hung Tran's algebra homework set 8. It includes worked problems on polynomial irreducibility using Eisenstein's criterion and field isomorphisms. The first problem shows that the polynomial x^4 + 1 is irreducible in Z[x] by reducing it modulo 2 and applying Eisenstein's criterion. The second problem demonstrates that the polynomial x^3 + 3 is irreducible in both Q[x] and Z[x] by again using Eisenstein's criterion. Additional problems establish properties of field extensions, construct field isomorphisms, find minimal polynomials and multiplication tables for finite fields, and prove statements about field homomorphisms.

Uploaded by

thp343
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views3 pages

Algebra Homework Set 8 Hung Tran. 9.4.2.c Reducing Mod 2

This document contains student Hung Tran's algebra homework set 8. It includes worked problems on polynomial irreducibility using Eisenstein's criterion and field isomorphisms. The first problem shows that the polynomial x^4 + 1 is irreducible in Z[x] by reducing it modulo 2 and applying Eisenstein's criterion. The second problem demonstrates that the polynomial x^3 + 3 is irreducible in both Q[x] and Z[x] by again using Eisenstein's criterion. Additional problems establish properties of field extensions, construct field isomorphisms, find minimal polynomials and multiplication tables for finite fields, and prove statements about field homomorphisms.

Uploaded by

thp343
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Algebra Homework Set 8

Hung Tran.

9.4.2.c
Reducing mod 2 yields: f2 (x) = x4 + 1 = (x + 1)4 . Then appyling Eisen-
stein’s criterion for the shifted polynomial g(x) = f (x + 1) and observing that
g(0) = f (−1) = 1 − 4 + 6 − 2 + 1 = 2 6≡ 0(mod22 ). Thus, g(x) is irreducible and so
is f (x) in Z[x]. QED

13.1.1
Since the polynomial is monic and primitive and Q is the fraction field of Z, it is
irreducible in Q[x] iff it is irreducible in Z[x]. Then applying Eisenstein’s criterion
and observing that 3 6≡ 0(mod32 ); thus it is irreducible in Z[x] and Q[x].
Using the Division Algorithm we have: x3 + 9x + 6 = (x2 + 8)(x + 1) − 2; that is,
1 2 3 ∼ 3
2 (x +8)(x+1) = 1 in Q[x]/(x +9x+6). By theorem 6, Q(θ) = Q[x]/(x +9x+6),
so (θ + 1)−1 = 21 (θ2 + 8). QED

13.2.19
a. Obviously for a, b in F and x, y in K, α(ax+by) = α(ax)+α(by) = aα(x)+bα(y)
since K is commutative. So α acting by left multiplication on K is an F-linear trans-
formation on K.
b. Consider K as a vector space over F.Since the extension is of degree n, there is
a basis containing n vectors ei , i = 1, ..., n, for K as vector space over F. Consider
the map: φ : K → Mn (F ) with φ(α) is the matrix associated with the linear trans-
formation of α acting by left multiplication with respect to the fixed basis.
Elementary algebra (as F is commutative) shows that this is a homomorphism of
rings (addition is defined pointwise and composition of functions is corresponding
to multiplication of matrices).
Since for each nonzero α there exists α−1 as K is a field, φ(α) is invertible as ma-
trix.(1)
Since αβ = βα, φ(α)φ(β)(x) = φ(β)φ(α)(x). Since the basis if fixed, and each
matrix is invertible, that implies φ(α)φ(β) = φ(β)φ(α).(2)
(1) and (2) imply that the image of φ is a subfield of the ring of n × n matrices
over F (the ring itself needs not be commutative). Furthermore, since the homo-
morphism is obviously nontrivial, by theorem 13.1.2, it is an isomorphism of fields.
That is K ∼ = φ(K). QED

13.2.20.
Consider the matrix A − Iα over K (not F) and its associated linear transformation
in K induced by matrix multiplication. For any x in K we have: (A − Iα)x =
Ax − Iαx = α(x) − α(x) = 0. Thus, det(A − Iα) = 0 in K (otherwise the formula
for inverse matrix still holds since K is commutative and produces an inverse linear
transformation, which is absurd). So α is a root of the characteristic polynomial of
A.
Another proof is that by the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, A satisfies its own charac-
teristic polynomial in Mn (F ). By 13.2.19, φ is an isomorphism of K and a subfield
of Mn (R) that sends α to A so α must also satisfies the characteristic polynomial
of A in K.
1
2

√ √ √
Let Q[ 3 2] be the field extension of Q by 3 2 then it is easy to see that [Q[ 3 2] : Q] =
3 as x3 − 2 is the minimal polynomial (irreducible√ in Q[x] by Eisenstein’s criterion
and proposition 13.2.9). √ Furthermore,√since 3 2 does not √ satisfied any quadratic
3 3 3
polynomial, e1 = √ 1, e =
2 √ 2 and e 3 = 4 are a basis of Q[ 2] over Q.
3 3
Certainly, α = 2 ∈ Q[ 2] so we can apply the result above with the observation
that α(e1 ) = e2 ,α(e2 ) = e3 α(e3 ) = 2e1 . So elementary algebra shows that the
matrix
 is: 
0 0 2
A= 1 0 0 
0 1 0
and its associated
√ characteristic polynomial is −x3 + 2 so the monic minimal poly-
3 3
nomial of 2 is x − √2 √ √
Similarly if β = 1 + 3 2 + 3 4 ∈ Q[ 3 2] and β(e1 ) = e1 + e2 + e3 ,β(e2 ) = 2e1 + e2 + e3
and α(e
 3 ) = 2e1 + 2e2 + e3 so the assoicated matrix is:
1 2 2
A= 1 1 2 
1 1 1
and its associated characteristic
√ polynomial
√ is (1 − x)3 − 6(1 − x) + 6 so the monic
minimal polynomial of 1 + 2 + 4 is x − 3x2 − 3x − 1 QED
3 3 3

13.2.21 √ √
Denote e1 = 1 and e2 = D and α = a + b D. We have α(e1 ) = ae1 + be2 and
α(e2 )= bDe1 +ae2 so the associated matrix is:
a bD
A=
b a
Let the map: φ :K → M2 (Q)  be defined as
p a bD
φ(a + b (D) =
b a
We have
 if 
a bD
A=
b a
 
m nD
and B =
n m
 
m + a (n + b)D
then A + B =
 n+b m+a 
am + bDn (an + bm)D
and AB =
an + bm am + bDn
So it is clear that φ is a ring 
homomorphism
 from K onto the subring H consisting
a bD
of matrices of the form A =
b a  
a −bD
Furthermore, since D is square-free: A−1 = a2 −b 1
2D is well defined
−b a

and A−1 = φ((a + B D)−1 ). Thus, H is a field and φ is a field isomorphism by
theorem 13.1.2

Additional problems
1
Consider the field K = F2 (x)/(x3 + x + 1). Since x3 + x + 1 has no root in F2 , it
3

is irreducible over F2 (x) and therefore, by theorem 13.2.11, K ∼ = F2 (α) with α is a


root of x3 + x + 1. So 1, α, α2 is a basis of K over F2 and every element of K can
be written in the form of a + bα + cα2 for a,b,c in F2 . Since F2 has exactly 2 el-
ements, K has exactly 8 elements. The multiplication table for K is given as follows:
k 0 1 α 1+α α2 α2 + 1 α2 + α α2 + α + 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 α 1+α α2 α2 + 1 α2 + α α2 + α + 1
α 0 α α2 α2 + α 1+α 1 α2 + α + 1 α2 + 1
2 2 2 2
α+1 0 1+α α +α α +1 α +α+1 α 1 α
α2 0 α2 1+α α2 + α + 1 α2 + α α α2 + 1 1
α2 + 1 0 α2 + 1 1 α2 α α2 + α + 1 1+α α2 + α
2 2 2 2
α +α 0 α +α α +α+1 1 α +1 1+α α α2
α2 + α + 1 0 α2 + α + 1 α2 + 1 α 1 α2 + α α2 1+α
QED

2
a.
Statement: If φ is any F-algebra homomorphism from K to a F-algebra H then
p(φ(α)) = 0 in H. Conversely, if a ∈ H such that p(a) = 0 in H then there is a
unique F-algebra homomorphism that sends α to a.
Proof:
(⇒) If φ is any F-algebra homomorphism then obviously φ sends 0 to 0. Since
p(α) = 0 and p is a polynomial with coefficients in F,p(φ(α)) = φ(p(α)) = 0 in H.
(⇐) Suppose degree(p(x)) = n. By theorem 13.1.4 and 13.2.11, 1, α, ...., (α)n−1 is
a basis for K over F. Since being a F-algebra homomorphism forces φ(1) = 1, once
the value φ(α) is given, φ(x) = φ(a0 + ... + an−1 αn−1 ) = a0 + ... + an−1 φ(α)n−1
is uniquely determined. Furthermore, it is completely routine to check that φ as
defined above is a F-algebra homomorphism (notice that ai ∈ F for i = 0, .., n − 1).
So the homomorphism exists and is unique.
b.
Also suppose degree(p(x)) = n then by theorem 9.5.17, p(x) has no more than
n roots counting multiplicity. Since p(x) splits completely into linear factors in
K[x], it has exactly n roots in K counting multiplicity. By part (a), a F-algebra
homomorphism to itself is corresponding to sending α to a root of p(x) (can be the
identity map). So the number of distinct F-algebra homomorphism to itself is the
number of distinct roots of p(x) in K and no more than n.
c.
Let φ be an F-algebra homomorphism from K to itself and φ(α) = β with β is a
root of p(x) in K. Then φ(1) = 1 and for any a in F: φ(a) = φ(a.1) = aφ(1) = a
with the 2nd equality comes from the fact that φ is a F-algebra homomorphism.
So φ is fixing F pointwise.
As p(x) is irreducible over F, β is not in F. By theorem 13.1.8, F (α) ∼ = F (β)
as vector spaces over F so F (β) also has dimension n over F. So F (β) = K and
1, β, ..., β n−1 is also a basis of K over F. Therefore, φ is surjective. The injectivity of
φ also follows immediately from the fact that any element in a vector space can be
written uniquely as a linear combination of its basis. Thus φ is an automorphism
from K to itself. QED

You might also like