Expansive and Non-Expansive Calcium Sulfoaluminate-Based Cements
Expansive and Non-Expansive Calcium Sulfoaluminate-Based Cements
Expansive and Non-Expansive Calcium Sulfoaluminate-Based Cements
htm
Scuola di Ingegneria, Universit degli Studi della Basilicata, Viale dellAteneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 2 Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, University of Wisconsin, North Cramer Street 3200, 53211 Milwaukee, USA, [email protected].
ABSTRACT
Within the curing period 4 hours- 90 days, a dimensionally stable calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cement, consisting of 83% CSA clinker and 17% natural gypsum by mass, and an expansive cementitious blend (MIX), composed by 40% CSA clinker, 40% CEM I- class 52.5 R ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and 20% natural gypsum by mass, were submitted to shrinkage and compressive strength tests as well as differential thermal-thermogravimetric analysis (DTA-TG) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). OPC was also used as a reference term. The early and late mechanical strengths were respectively highest for CSA cement and lowest for MIX cement which, furthermore, showed the minimum shrinkage. These phenomena were attributed to (i) the faster reaction rate of CSA and MIX cements, and (ii) the non-expansive/expansive nature of ettringite respectively formed. Each investigated cement exhibited peculiar features in terms of pore size distribution modalities and threshold pore widths. Keywords. Calcium sulfoaluminate cements, expansion, dimensional stability, pore size distribution, ettringite.
INTRODUCTION
The interesting engineering properties (Marroccoli et al., 2007) of calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) based binders and the environmentally friendly features (Marroccoli et al., 2010) associated with their manufacturing cycle have been widely recognized by the international scientific community and greatly appreciated during the last years (Buzzi et al., 2010; Chen & Juenger, 2011; Gartner & Macphee, 2011; Gastaldi et al., 2011; Juenger et al., 2011; Marchi & Costa, 2011; Winnefeld & Lothenbach, 2010; Valenti et al., 2012). These binders can be used as expansive cements giving shrinkage-compensating and self-stressing effects or dimensionally stable cements with high early hardening and durability (Beretka et al., 1996; Bernardo et al., 2006; Bernardo et al., 2007; Budnikov & Kravchenko, 1968; Cohen & Richards, 1982; Deng & Tang, 1994; Glasser, 2002; Jun-An et al., 1980; Klein & Troxell, 1958; Mehta & Monteiro, 2006; Nakamura et al., 1968; Odler, 2000; Odler & ColanSubauste, 1999). Their technical behaviour mostly depends on the ability of C4 A3 S (yeelimite, key-component) to generate upon hydration C 6 AS3 H 32 , ettringite, according to the following reactions: (1) C 4 A 3 S + 6C + 8CS + 96H 3C 6 A S 3 H 32
C 4 A 3 S + 2CS + 38H C6 AS3 H32 + 2AH3
(2)
here CS refers to both anhydrite incorporated in the CSA clinker and calcium sulfate given by added gypsum or anhydrite. The first reaction requires the presence of lime which can be produced by the hydration of calcium silicates given by (i) ordinary Portland cements blended with CSA-based binders or (ii) modified Portland cements containing C 4 A 3 S instead of C 3 A (tricalcium aluminate); furthermore, calcium hydroxide can be also generated by the hydration of reactive C (calcium oxide) or C2S (dicalcium silicate) present in CSA clinkers. These can also include C3A, C5S2 S (ternesite), C2AS (gehlenite), C12A7 (mayenite), C4AF (brownmillerite) and other minor constituents. Regarding the expansive behaviour, there is a general agreement about the considerable influence exerted by the rate of ettringite formation. As a matter of fact, expansive phenomena, coupled with internal stresses, can occur once the hydrated cement has lost its plasticity and has reached a certain mechanical strength (Beretka et al., 1996; Cohen & Richards, 1982; Mehta & Monteiro, 2006; Odler, 2000; Odler & Colan-Subauste, 1999), in conjunction with a significant ettringite amount produced after setting (due to a large or delayed ettringite generation). Moreover, expansion is enhanced by a relatively high nucleation rate of ettringite, increasing with the increase of the concentration of the ionic species (OH-, Ca++, SO4--, Al(OH)4-) contributing to its formation (Deng & Tang, 1994). Therefore, CSA cements hydrated (i) in a strong alkaline environment, (ii) in the presence of lime or (iii) with a high amount of added calcium sulfate, are expansive; on the contrary, they are dimensionally stable if hydrated together with relatively moderate calcium sulfate additions, at not elevated pH values. Since 1960s, the cements based on C4A3S have been mainly used as expansive binders hydrated in the presence of lime (Budnikov & Kravchenko, 1968; Klein & Troxell, 1958; Nakamura et al., 1968): for these cements, the key-reaction is that described by the equation (1). Later, rapid-hardening and dimensionally stable CSA cements have been developed and manufactured in China (Jun-An et al., 1980), owing to the considerable work carried out by the China Building Materials Academy. According to the reaction (2), they quickly generate, in the presence of nearly stoichiometric amounts of calcium sulfate, non-expansive ettringite and aluminium hydroxide. In this work, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) was employed in order to characterize two series of paste specimens obtained from the hydration, at various curing times, of (i) a CSA cement consisting of an industrial CSA clinker and added gypsum, to be used as dimensionally stable binder, and (ii) an expansive cement composed by the above mentioned CSA clinker, a commercial CEM I-class 52.5 R (according to EN-197-1 Standard) Portland cement and gypsum; for the sake of comparison, a third series of CEM I-class 52.5 R Portland cement paste specimens was also investigated. This paper aimed at searching for differences in the porosimetric behaviour between expansive and non-expansive CSA-based binders. The hydration process was also followed by means of differential thermal-thermogravimetric (DTA-TG) analysis. Furthermore, shrinkage measurements and compressive strength tests were performed.
EXPERIMENTAL Materials
An industrial CSA clinker, a commercial CEM Iclass 52.5 R Portland cement and a natural gypsum with about 90% calcium sulfate dihydrate by mass, were used in this research. The
mineralogical composition of CSA clinker, determined by means of the Rietveld method, is indicated in Table 1.
C4 A3 S
52.1
C2S 23.8
C3A 9.4
CS
4.9
C4AF 4.7
C2AS 1.6
M 1.4
C12A7 1.2
C5 S2 S
0.9
total 100.0
The Rietveld results were normalized to 100% of accounted crystalline phases. Three binders were investigated: 1) a CSA cement containing 83% CSA clinker and 17% natural gypsum, by mass; 2) the commercial CEM Iclass 52.5 R Portland cement; 3) a cementitious mixture consisting of 40% CSA clinker, 40% CEM Iclass 52.5 R Portland cement and 20% natural gypsum, by mass. The three cements were indicated with the symbols CSA, OPC and MIX, respectively. The CS / C4 A3 S mol ratio available for the CSA cement hydration was 1.7, close to the stoichiometric value required by the reaction (2).
Table 2. Phases involved in the Rietveld refinement, related crystal systems, AMCSD codes and references
phase yeelimite larnite anhydrite
tricalcium aluminate mayenite brownmillerite gehlenite ternesite
periclase
formula
C4 A 3 S
C2S
CS C3A C12A7 C4AF C2AS
C 5S 2 S M
MIX
Shrinkage ( m/m)
28
60 8
90
Figure 1. Shrinkage vs. curing time for CSA, MIX and OPC cements
lowest shrinkage, owing to the strong shrinkage-compensating effect associated with its expansive nature. In Table 3 the results of the compressive strength test on the three cements are reported. At very early ages the extremely positive influence of the rapid ettringite formation and its ability to counterbalance both the decreased C3S hydration rate and the reduced Portland cement concentration are clearly evident for CSA and MIX cements, respectively (Gastaldi et al., 2011). Afterwards, the intensity of these effects tends to decrease because the hydration rate of C4 A3 S and Portland cement is strongly reduced and increased, respectively.
Table 3. Compressive strength data (MPa) for CSA, MIX and OPC cements, at various curing times
CSA MIX OPC 4 hours 23.3 7.8 8 hours 27.0 18.2 2.0 1 day 35.8 30.0 21.5 7 days 53.3 39.4 49.5 28 days 61.8 54.7 61.0
No effects were recorded by DTA-TG analysis above 300 and 600C for C 4 A 3 S -based binders and OPC, respectively. Its results for the pastes are illustrated in Fig. 2. The endothermal peaks at 13623C, 2706C and 48418C are related to dehydration of ettringite, aluminium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide, respectively (Taylor, 1997). For OPC (Figure 2-A), the peak of ettringite (formed by the hydration of C3A and gypsum) appears at very early ages and quickly reaches a steady state; the effect of calcium hydroxide (derived from the C3S and C2S hydration) is barely detected at 4 hours and progressively increases with the increase of curing time. For CSA cement (Figure 2-B), the peak of ettringite (generated by the C4 A3 S hydration) is rising steadily from early to long curing times, while the other hydration product of the reaction (2) (aluminium hydroxide) is clearly visible starting from 1 day of hydration. For MIX cement (Figure 2-C), the ettringite peak is lower than that shown by CSA, the curing time being the same, due to the reduced C4 A3 S concentration; the aluminium hydroxide effect is barely detected within the first 24 hours and subsequently does not appear, owing to the probable reaction of aluminium hydroxide with C2S to give strtlingite (C2ASH8) (Winnefeld & Lothenbach, 2010). No calcium hydroxide arising from Portland cement hydration is observed, most likely because of its combination with other compounds present in the reacting system. The porosimetric behaviour of the thee cements is described in the Figures 3 and 4 where the cumulative and derivative Hg volume is respectively reported as a function of pore radius for OPC, CSA and MIX cements hydrated at various curing times. According to the scientific literature (Cook & Hover, 1999; Hearn & Hotorn, 1992; Winslow & Diamond, 1970), for Portland cement pastes both total porosity and threshold pore width decrease with the increase of curing time. At early ages, the differential curves show a sharply defined initial peak, indicating a unimodal pore size distribution centered on the lowest width of pore necks connecting a continuous system. Then, at smaller pore sizes, there is the presence of a second peak corresponding to the pressure required to break through the blockages formed by the hydration products isolating the interior pore space. At the same time, the cumulative pore volume is strongly reduced.
0.3
0.6
0.6
(A)
(B)
Peak Intensity, mV/mg
DTA TG 0.4
90 d
(C)
DTA TG
m, mg
m, mg
-15 0.0
Exo
0.2
-15
0.2
-15
0.0
-0.1
Exo
0.0
Exo
-35
-35
-35
Temperature, C
0.3 5 0.6
Temperature, C
5 0.6
Temperature, C
5
28 d
DTA TG
m, mg
m, mg
-15 0.0
Exo
0.2
-15
0.2
-15
0.0
-0.1
Exo
0.0
Exo
-35
-35
-35
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.4
DTA TG
DTA TG
24 h
0.4
DTA TG
m, mg
m, mg
-15 0.0
Exo
0.2
-15
0.2
-15
-0.1
0.0
Exo
0.0
Exo
-35
-35
-35
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
0.3
0.6
0.6
8h
m, mg
m, mg
-15 0.0
Exo
0.2
-15
0.2
-15
-0.1
0.0
Exo
0.0
Exo
-35
-35
-35
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
0.3
0.6
0.6
4h
0.4
DTA TG
4h
0.4
DTA TG
m, mg
m, mg
0.2
-15
0.2
-15
0.0
-0.1
Exo
0.0
Exo
-35
-35
-35
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
Figure 2. DTA-TG thermograms for paste hydrated OPC (A), CSA (B) and MIX (C) cements at various curing times
m, mg
0.1
m, mg
0.1
m, mg
0.1
m, mg
0.1
m, mg
0.1
In this investigation, the change of regime for OPC cement occurs after 2 days of hydration.
160
24 h
Cumulative volume, mm /g
10000
Pore radius, nm
160
16 h
Cumulative volume, mm /g
10000
Pore radius, nm
160
8h
160
Cumulative volume, mm /g
Cumulative volume, mm /g
140
2d
10000
Pore radius, nm
Pore radius, nm
Figure 3. Cumulative Hg volume vs. pore radius for OPC, CSA and MIX cement pastes cured at various ages
For CSA cement, due to the rapid formation of hydration products, a multimodal pore size distribution is quickly established with prevailing low porosity regions; then, a behaviour similar to that of OPC cement is shown at longer ages. For MIX cement, owing to the fast generation of expansive ettringite, a peculiar unimodal pore size distribution is observed together with cumulative pore volumes higher and lower (up to 1 day of hydration) than those of CSA cement and OPC, respectively; the critical pore
300
24 h
DV/Dlog(R)
10000
Pore radius, nm
300
16 h
250 200 150 100 50 0 1 10 100 1000
DV/Dlog(R)
10000
Pore radius, nm
300
8h
300
OPC CSA MIX
2d
DV/Dlog(R)
10000
DV/Dlog(R)
10
100
1000
10000
Pore radius, nm
Pore radius, nm
Figure 4. Derivative Hg volume vs. pore radius for OPC, CSA and MIX cement pastes cured at various ages
radii are, during all the investigated curing period, much larger than those of CSA cement and some multimodality appears in the pore size distribution at longer ages.
CONCLUSIONS
From DTA-TG results it can be argued that, compared to a CEM I 52.5 R Portland cement (OPC), a non-expansive CSA cement, containing CSA clinker and gypsum, and an expansive ternary cementitious blend (MIX), composed by CSA clinker, OPC and gypsum,
have a higher initial reaction rate, being the amount of (non expansive) ettringite generated by the higher than that of (expansive) ettringite originated by the latter. This explains why, compared to OPC whose main hydration product is a calcium silicate hydrate very prone to the release of absorbed water molecules, CSA cement gives greater mechanical strength and lower shrinkage, whereas MIX cement shows higher early (up to 1 day) hardening and even more reduced shrinkage. The porosimetric behaviour of MIX and CSA cements is respectively related to the expansive or non-expansive nature of the produced ettringite. The pore size distribution of the former is unimodal (as for early cured OPC) with critical pore sizes larger than those of the latter, characterized by a multimodal distribution.
REFERENCES
content Beretka, J., Marroccoli, M., Sherman, N., Valenti, G.L. (1996). The influence of C A S and w/s ratio on the performance of calcium sulfoaluminate-based cements. Cement & Concrete Research, 26,1673-1681. Bernardo, G., Telesca, A., and Valenti, G.L. (2006). A porosimetric study of calcium sulfoaluminate cement pastes cured at early ages. Cement & Concrete Research, 36,1042-1047. Bernardo, G., Buzzi, L., Canonico, F., Paris, M., Telesca, A., and Valenti, G.L. (2007). Microstructural Investigations on Hydrated High-Performance Cements Based on Calcium Sulfoaluminate. Proc. of the 12th Int. Congr. Chem. Cem., W3 11.4, Montreal, Canada. Boysen, H., Lerch, M., Stys, and H., Semyshyn, A. (2007). Structure and oxygen mobility in mayenite: a high-temperature neutron powder diffraction study. Acta Cryst. B63, 675-682. Budnikov, P.B. and Kravchenko, I.V. (1968). Expansive cements. Proc. 5th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, V,319-329. Tokyo, Japan: The Cement Association of Japan. Buzzi L., Canonico F., Telesca A. and Valenti, G.L. (2010). High-performance and low-CO2 cements based on calcium sulphoaluminate. Zement Kalk Gips International, 5,39-45. Chen, I.A. and Juenger, M.C.G. (2011). Synthesis and hydration of calcium sulfoaluminatebelite cements with varied phase compositions. Journal of Materials Science, 46,2568-2577. Cohen, M. and Richards, C. (1982). Effects of the particle sizes of expansive clinker on strength expansion characteristics of type K expansive cements. Cement & Concrete Research, 12,717725. Cook, R. A., and Hover K. C. (1999). Mercury porosimetry of hardened cement pastes. Cement & Concrete. Research 29, 933-943. Deng, M. and Tang, M. (1994). Formation and expansion of ettringite crystals. Cement &Concrete Research, 24,119-126. Gartner, E.M. and Macphee, D.E. (2011). A physico-chemical basis for novel cementitious binders. Cement & Concrete Research, 41,736-749. Gastaldi, D., Canonico, F., Capelli, L., Pace, M.L., Telesca, A. and Valenti, G.L. (2011). Hydraulic Behaviour of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement Alone and in Mixture with Portland Cement. Proc. 13th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, paper 412. Madrid, Spain: Instituto de Ciencias de la Construccin Eduardo Torroja. Glasser, F.P. (2002). Advances in sulphoaluminate cements. Proc. of the 5th Int. Symp. on the Cement & Concrete, 1,14-24. Shanghai, China: China Building Materials Academy. Hawthorne, F. C., and Ferguson, R. B. (1975). Anhydrous sulphates. II. Refinement of the crystal structure of anhydrite. The Can. Miner. 13, 289-292. Hazen, R. M. (1976). Effects of temperature and pressure on the cell dimension and X-ray temperature factors of periclase. Amer. Miner. 61, 266-271. Hearn, N., and Hooton, R. D. (1992). Sample mass and dimension effects on mercury intrusion porosimetry result. Cement & Concrete Research. 22, 970-980. Iran, E., Tillmanns, E., Hentschel, and Ternesite, G. (1997). Ca5(SiO4)2SO4, a new mineral from Ettringer Bellerberg/Eifel, Germany. Miner. and Petr. 60, 121-132.
Juenger, M.C.G., Winnefeld, F., Provis, J.L. and Ideker, J.H. (2011). Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cement & Concrete Research, 41,1232-1243. Jun-An, D., Wen-Min, G., Muzhen, S. and Xiu-Ying, L. (1980). Sulfoaluminate cement series. Proc. 7th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, IV,381-386. Paris, France: Editions Septima. Klein, A. and Troxell, G.E. (1958). Studies of calcium sulfoaluminate admixtures for expansive cements. Proc. ASTM, 58,968-1008. Philadelphia, USA: American Society for Testing Materials. Marchi, M. and Costa, U. (2011). Influence of the calcium sulphate and w/c ratio on the hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate cement. Proc. 13th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, paper 191. Madrid, Spain: Instituto de Ciencias de la Construccin Eduardo Torroja. Marroccoli, M., Nobili, M., Telesca, A., and Valenti, G.L. (2007). Early hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate-based cements for structural applications. Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 389-395, Coventry, UK. Marroccoli, M., Montagnaro, F., Telesca, A., and Valenti, G.L. (2010). Environmental Implications of the Manufacture of Calcium Sulfoaluminate-based Cements. 2nd Int. Conf. on sustainable construction materials and technologies, paper 162, Ancona, Italy. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2006). Concrete Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York. Nakamura, T., Sudoh, G. and Akaiwa, S. (1968). Mineralogical composition of expansive cement clinker rich in SiO2 and its expansibility Proc. 5th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, IV,351-365. Tokyo, Japan: The Cement Association of Japan. Odler, I. and Colan-Subauste, J. (1999). Investigations on cement expansion associated with ettringite formation. Cement and Concrete Research, 29,731-735. Odler, I. (2000). Special Inorganic Cements. 1st ed.,Taylor & Francis, London. Redhammer, G. J., Tippelt, G., Roth, G., and Amthauer, G. (2004) Structural variations in the brownmillerite series: single-crystal X-ray diffraction at 25C and high temperature X-ray powder diffraction (25CT1000C). Amer. Min.89, 405-420. Saalfeld, H., and Depmeier, W. (1972). Silicon-free compounds with sodalite structure. Krist. und Technik 7, 229-233. Steele, F. A., and Davey, W. P. (1929). The crystal structure of tricalcium aluminate. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 51, 2283-2293. Swainson, I. P., Dove, M. T., Schmahl, W. W., and Putnis, A. (1992). Neutron powder diffraction study of the akermanite-gehlenite solid solution series. Phys. and Chem. of Min. 19, 185-195. Taylor, H. F. W. (1997). Cement Chemistry, Academic Press, London. Tsurumi, T., Hiramo, Y., Kato, H., Kamiya, T, and Daimon, M. (1994). Crystal structure and hydration of belite. Cer. Trans. 40, 19-25. Unicemento, UNI 6687-73 (1973). Cement mortar. Hydraulic shrinkage determination. Laboratory test. Valenti, G.L., Marroccoli, M., Pace, M.L. and Telesca, A. (2012). Discussion of the paper Understanding expansion in calcium sulfoaluminatebelite cements by Chen, I.A., et al. (2012) Cement and Concrete Research, 42,51-60. Cement & Concrete Research, 42,1555-1559. Winnefeld, F. and Lothenbach, B. (2010). Hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate cementsexperimental findings and thermodynamic modeling. Cement & Concrete Research, 40,12391247. Winslow, D. N., and Diamond, S. (1970). A mercury porosimetry study of the evolution of porosity in Portland cement. ASTM J Mater 3, 564-585.