Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 333 views

    Individual Oral Commentary Marking Criteria

    Uploaded by

    floramather
    This document provides marking criteria for individual oral commentaries on literary texts for the International Baccalaureate's Standard Level and Higher Level exams. It evaluates commentaries based on four criteria: knowledge and understanding of the text; understanding of literary features; organization; and language use. For each criterion, it provides descriptors and corresponding point scales to assess the level of demonstration from 0 to 5 points.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Individual Oral Commentary Marking Criteria

    Uploaded by

    floramather
    333 views2 pages
    This document provides marking criteria for individual oral commentaries on literary texts for the International Baccalaureate's Standard Level and Higher Level exams. It evaluates commentaries based on four criteria: knowledge and understanding of the text; understanding of literary features; organization; and language use. For each criterion, it provides descriptors and corresponding point scales to assess the level of demonstration from 0 to 5 points.

    Original Description:

    .

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides marking criteria for individual oral commentaries on literary texts for the International Baccalaureate's Standard Level and Higher Level exams. It evaluates commentaries based on four criteria: knowledge and understanding of the text; understanding of literary features; organization; and language use. For each criterion, it provides descriptors and corresponding point scales to assess the level of demonstration from 0 to 5 points.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    333 views2 pages

    Individual Oral Commentary Marking Criteria

    Uploaded by

    floramather
    This document provides marking criteria for individual oral commentaries on literary texts for the International Baccalaureate's Standard Level and Higher Level exams. It evaluates commentaries based on four criteria: knowledge and understanding of the text; understanding of literary features; organization; and language use. For each criterion, it provides descriptors and corresponding point scales to assess the level of demonstration from 0 to 5 points.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Critical Study: Individual Oral Commentary Marking Criteria (SL and HL)

    0
    Criterion A: Knowledge and Understanding of the text(s) and subject matter or extract To what extent does the commentary show knowledge and understanding of the text? Are the comments supported by wellchosen references to the text? Criterion B: Understanding of the use and effects of literary features To what extent does the commentary show an awareness of how the literary features in the text (for example, structure, technique and style) are used to construct meaning? To what extent does the commentary show understanding of the effects of literary features?

    1-2

    3-4

    5-6

    7-8

    9-10

    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors

    The commentary shows limited knowledge and little or no understanding of the text; comments are rarely supported by references to the text.

    The commentary shows superficial knowledge and understanding of the text; comments are occasionally supported by references to the text.

    The commentary shows adequate knowledge and understanding of the text; comments are generally supported by reference to the text.

    The commentary shows a very good knowledge and understanding of the text; comments are supported by wellchosen references to the text.

    The commentary shows excellent knowledge and understanding of the text; comments are effectively supported by well-chosen references to the text.

    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors

    There is little awareness of the use of literary features and little or no illustration of their effects on the reader.

    There is some awareness of the use of literary features, with few references illustrating the effects on the reader.

    There is adequate awareness and illustration of the use of literary features, with understanding of their effects on the reader.

    There is good awareness and illustration of the use of literary features, with detailed understanding of their effects on the reader.

    There is excellent awareness and illustration of the use of literary features, with detailed understanding of their effects on the reader.

    0
    Criterion C: Organisation How well organized is the commentary? How coherent is the structure? The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors

    1
    Little organization is apparent; the commentary has little structure.

    2
    Some organization is apparent; the commentary has some structure.

    3
    The commentary is adequately organized; the structure is generally coherent

    4
    The commentary is well organized; the structure is mostly coherent.

    5
    The commentary is very effectively organized; the structure is coherent and effective.

    Criterion D: Language How clear, varied and accurate is the language? How appropriate is the choice of register and style (Register refers, in this context, to the students use of elements such as vocabulary, tone, sentence structure and terminology appropriate to the commentary.)

    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors

    The language is rarely clear and appropriate, with many errors in grammar and sentence construction and little sense of register and style.

    The language is sometimes clear and appropriate; grammar and sentence construction are generally accurate although errors and inconsistencies are apparent; register and style are to some extent appropriate to the commentary.

    The language is mostly clear and appropriate, with an adequate degree of accuracy in grammar and sentence construction; the register and style are mostly appropriate to the commentary

    The language is clear and appropriate, with a good degree of accuracy in grammar and sentence construction; register and style are effective and appropriate to the commentary.

    The language is very clear and entirely appropriate, with a high degree of accuracy in grammar and sentence construction; the register and style are consistently effective and appropriate to the commentary.

    You might also like