Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 115 views

    Liars Paradox

    Uploaded by

    evilmonsterbeast
    The liar paradox arises from a self-referential statement like "This sentence is false" that leads to a logical contradiction regardless of whether it is considered true or false. If the statement is true, then it is false, but if it is false, then it is true - an infinite loop. The paradox questions whether common assumptions about binary truth values can consistently assign truth values to all statements. It was first recorded by the ancient Greek philosopher Eubulides of Miletus, though similar statements have been attributed to earlier sources like Epimenides. Explaining and resolving the paradox has been a challenge for philosophers and logicians over centuries.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Liars Paradox

    Uploaded by

    evilmonsterbeast
    115 views2 pages
    The liar paradox arises from a self-referential statement like "This sentence is false" that leads to a logical contradiction regardless of whether it is considered true or false. If the statement is true, then it is false, but if it is false, then it is true - an infinite loop. The paradox questions whether common assumptions about binary truth values can consistently assign truth values to all statements. It was first recorded by the ancient Greek philosopher Eubulides of Miletus, though similar statements have been attributed to earlier sources like Epimenides. Explaining and resolving the paradox has been a challenge for philosophers and logicians over centuries.

    Original Description:

    Logic

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The liar paradox arises from a self-referential statement like "This sentence is false" that leads to a logical contradiction regardless of whether it is considered true or false. If the statement is true, then it is false, but if it is false, then it is true - an infinite loop. The paradox questions whether common assumptions about binary truth values can consistently assign truth values to all statements. It was first recorded by the ancient Greek philosopher Eubulides of Miletus, though similar statements have been attributed to earlier sources like Epimenides. Explaining and resolving the paradox has been a challenge for philosophers and logicians over centuries.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    115 views2 pages

    Liars Paradox

    Uploaded by

    evilmonsterbeast
    The liar paradox arises from a self-referential statement like "This sentence is false" that leads to a logical contradiction regardless of whether it is considered true or false. If the statement is true, then it is false, but if it is false, then it is true - an infinite loop. The paradox questions whether common assumptions about binary truth values can consistently assign truth values to all statements. It was first recorded by the ancient Greek philosopher Eubulides of Miletus, though similar statements have been attributed to earlier sources like Epimenides. Explaining and resolving the paradox has been a challenge for philosophers and logicians over centuries.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    In philosophy and logic, the liar paradox or liar's paradox (pseudomenon in Ancient Greek), is the statement "This sentence

    is false." Trying to assign to this statement a classical binary truth value leads to a contradiction (see arado!). If "This sentence is false" is true, then the sentence is false, "hich "ould in turn mean that it is actually true, but this "ould mean that it is false, and so on ad infinitum. #imilarly, if "This sentence is false" is false, then the sentence is true, "hich "ould in turn mean that it is actually false, but this "ould mean that it is true, and so on ad infinitum.

    History The $pimenides parado! (circa %&& '() has been suggested as an e!ample of the liar parado!, but they are not logically e)uivalent. The fictional speaker $pimenides, a (retan, reportedly stated that "The (retans are al"ays liars."*citation needed+ ,o"ever $pimenides- statement that all (retans are liars can be resolved as false, given that he kno"s of at least one other (retan "ho does not lie. It is unlikely that $pimenides intended his "ords to be understood as a kind of liar parado!, and they "ere probably only understood as such much later in history. *citation needed+ The oldest kno"n version of the actual liar parado! is attributed to the Greek philosopher $ubulides of .iletus "ho lived in the /th century '(. It is very unlikely that he kne" of $pimenides-s "ords, even if they "ere intended as a parado!.*citation needed+ $ubulides reportedly asked, "A man says that he is lying. Is "hat he says true or false0" The parado! "as once discussed by #t. 1erome in a sermon2 "I said in my alarm, -$very man is a liar3- ( salm. 44%244) Is 5avid telling the truth or is he lying0 If it is true that every man is a liar, and 5avid-s statement, "$very man is a liar" is true, then 5avid also is lying6 he, too, is a man. 'ut if he, too, is lying, his statement2 "$very man is a liar," conse)uently is not true. 7hatever "ay you turn the proposition, the conclusion is a contradiction. #ince 5avid himself is a man, it follo"s that he also is lying6 but if he is lying because every man is a liar, his lying is of a different sort."*4+ In early Islamic tradition liar parado! "as discussed for at least 8 centuries starting from late 9th century apparently "ithout being influenced by any other tradition. :a;r al<5;n al<=s;could have been the first logician to identify the liar parado! as self<referential.

    Explanation of the paradox and variants

    The problem of the liar parado! is that it seems to sho" that common beliefs about truth and falsity actually lead to a contradiction. #entences can be constructed that cannot consistently be assigned a truth value even though they are completely in accord "ith grammar and semantic rules. The simplest version of the parado! is the sentence2 This statement is false. (A) If (A) is true, then "This statement is false" is true. Therefore (A) must be false. The hypothesis that (A) is true leads to the conclusion that (A) is false, a contradiction. If (A) is false, then "This statement is false" is false. Therefore (A) must be true. The hypothesis that (A) is false leads to the conclusion that (A) is true, another contradiction. $ither "ay, (A) is both true and false, "hich is a parado!.

    You might also like