CHAPTER 2 DETERMINING THE POOL OR SPA HEATING LOAD

INTRODUCTION Because the magnitude of the heating load forms the basis for subsequent sizing decisions it is important to determine that load as accurately as possible When converting from conventional heating to solar heating of a pool historical energy consumption records (if available) may be used to estimate future heating requirements. When designing a solar pool heating

system for a new pool, it is often possible to use energy consumption data from a nearby pool as a basis for estimating the energy requirement of the proposed installation Energy consumption may differ significantly be tween

pools, but if they are similarly situated, sized, exposed to sunlight

and protected from the wind, this is usually not the case

2.1

CONVERTING FROM CONVENTIONAL FUELS

2.1.1 Electric Resistance Pool Heaters

Electric resistance pool heaters usually operate with an efficiency approaching 100%

If they have been metered separately the energy con-

sumption may be calculated by using the following formula Btu/time period = 3413 x kWh/time period

2.1.2 O i l - and Gas-Fired Pool Heaters

Gas- and oil-fired pool heaters more often operate at 50-75% fuel conversion efficiency in field service than the 8&% efficiency they e-xhibit

in laboratory tests

FSEC recommends the use of a 7% conversion factor

The aver-

unless a substantial body of field data supports higher claims

energy content of commonly used liquid and gaseous fuels is given in Table 2

Table 2 . 1 Energy Content of Oil and Gas

Fuel
(Propane) Natural gas Light home heating oil

following formula may be used to calculate the energy furnished by gas- and oil-fired heaters Btu/time period = 0 . 7 x Btu contenthnit x units/time period

2.1.3 Steam-Fired Heat Exchangers

If steam from a central boiler and a heat exchanger have been used to heat a pool or spa, sufficient data may exist to calculate the pool heatload from the manufacturer's data on the heat exchanger effectiveness and steam quality and consumption data If such is not the case, weather

data may be used to estimate the heat losses from the pool during the heating season

2.1.4 Heat Pump Water Heaters

Dedicated heat pumps (also called heat pump water heaters) are manufactured specifically for swimming pool and spa heating performance (COP Coefficients of

of 4 to 8 are claimed by several of their manufactures

If the energy input of such units is separately monitored, the following formula may be used to calculate their thermal output Btu/time period = kWh/time period x 3413 x COP

2.2 CALCULATING HEAT ,LOSSES FRGM SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS:

In the absence of reliable, historical, energy-consumption data, it may be convenient to calculate the heat losses which may be expected t o occur from a pool under various monthly weather conditions These losses

then may be equated to the pool's average energy requirement for a given increment of time Past records of monthly average air temperatures,

humidities, and pool temperatures may yield sufficiently accurate results for some purposes For other purposes, it may be necessary to make

calculations based on daily weather data and sum them to arrive at monthly totals Weather data for eight Florida cities is contained in Appendix E

Because the calculation procedure required is somewhat tedious, tables containing loss factors for six Florida cities and several pool configurations have been developed and are presented in Appendix "G"

Appropriate

monthly values may be multiplied by pool areas and to arrive at total monthly losses

2.2.1 Heat Losses from Pools and Spas

b

Heat Losses from .a swimming

'

pool or spa may be attributed to four mechanisms

1) Conduction through the pool walls.
2)

Convection from the pool surface

from "Solar Heating for Swimming Pools", published by the Environmental Information Center, Winter Park, FL.

*Adapted

Radiation

Evaporation and convection

3
Conduction

Figure 2.1 Pool Heat Loss Mechanisms

3) Reradiation from the pool surface

4)

Evaporation from the pool surface

Figure 2 . 1 shows the loss

mechanisms and relative magnitudes for swimming pools

2.2.1.1 Conduction Losses

a

--

Because most soils are poor conductors of

heat, losses through the bottoms and sides of below-grade pools are usua. ly small enough to ignore. However, if pools are situated where cold

groundwater flows past them, the following formula and heat transfer coefficients may be used to estimate the losses

The same formula mag be

a l l losses from above-ground pools used to estimate w

Qc=UxAxAt

where Qc is the conductive loss in Btu/hr,

U

is the overall conductive heat transfer coefficient in ~ t u / f t ? / h r

(per OF), and

A

is the pool w a l l area in square feet (plus the area of the pool

bottom in the case of below-grade pools) For below-grade pools :

A t is the pool temperature minus ground water temperature

For above-ground pools:

At is the pool temperature minus air temperature

Below Grade Pools: Even under conditions of rapid groundwater flow, the soil close to the pool shell will rise in temperature as it absorbs heat from the pool

This reduces the temperature difference (At)

Be-

cause it is difficult to evaluate this reduction from individual situations, the following U values for both concrete and fiberglass walls have been modified using experimental data developed by ASHRAE engineers for uninsulated cement basement floors The U values are for use with actual

pool and groundwater temperature differences

U = 0.1 for 4-in

concrete pool walls with a 1-in. marble-cement

waterproof inner lining, and

U = 0.1 for %-in

(nominal) fiberglass-reinforced plastic pool walls This is because the

The two values are, for our purposes, the same.

main resistance to heat flow is not in the wall, but is in the soil surrounding it

EXAMPLE

A 30' x'45' concrete pool with an average depth of 5 feet is

located a t a canal-front motel in a Florida coastal city

The motel manager

wants to maintain the pool to 80F during November when the groundwater
is 70F
Calculate the conductive losses.

Q = 0 . 1 x [(301 x 5' x 2) + (45' x 5' x 2) + (30' x 45')l

x (80

- 70)

= 2100 Btu/hr
If the bottoms of such pools rest f w l y on However, losses

(b) Above-ground Pools:

the ground, heat loss through them may be ignored.

through the walls of above-ground pools may be large enough to require consideration. The following overall coefficients include the insulating

effect of the static air film a t interface of the air and support wall For vinyl pool liners supported by uninsulated, shells : corrugated metal

U = 2 for 0-mph wind speeds,

U = 4 for 7-mph wind speeds, and

U = 6 for 15-mph wind speeds.
If an inch of foam insulation is applied to the outside of the supporting shell, U = 0.1. For vinyl pool liners supported by 1-in thick

wood walls, U = 0.8 (7 mph average wind speed).

For above-ground $-in

fiberglass-plastic walls supported by an open framework of wood o r metal tubing, U = 1.9 (7-mph average wind speed).

EXAMPLE: A round, above-ground pool, 4 feet deep and 18 feet in

diameter, is subjected to 6SF winds blowing a 7 mph.

If the pool temper-

ature is 80F and it is supported by an uninsulated corrugated metal wall how much heat is lost through the wall each hour? through the pool bottom may be ignored.)
2-6

(n = 3.14, and losses

Q = 4 x 4' (3.14 x 18') x (80

- 65O)
About one half of the

= 13,565 Btu/hr
A little data interpretation is called for here.

pool wall is protected from the 7-mph wind, so the loss coefficent is nearer to 2 on the leeward side of the pool. closer to 10,OOQ Btu than 14,000 Btu The actual loss may be less than the higher calculated value, howTherefore, the actual losses are

ever, the example indicates that insulating the walls of this above-ground pool may be well worth the cost if the pool is to be heated

2.2.1.2

Convection Losses.

The convection losses may be evaluated

using the formula

- hcv A At
is the convective heat loss in Btu/hr,

where :

is the convective transfer coefficent in ~ t u / f t * / h r(per OF)

1 + . 3 x wind speed (mph)

is the pool area in ft2, and

A t is the temperature difference between the pool and the air.

It is important to understand that the rate of convective transfer varies

w i t h both the temperature difference and the wind speed, and is depen-

dent on a series of resistances to heat transfer

Any heat which escapes

h i n but static liquid film from the pool by convection must pass through a t
at the pool surface It then must pass through a thin but static layer of It next passes through a boundary

a i r in contact with the Liquid surface.

layer of eddy currents in the air, and finally is taken up by the main

airstream where it -is carried away from the pool by either natural or forced convection The transmission of heat through the thin fluid layers

themselves is by conduction The thickness of the static air layer affects the rate of heat loss and varies greatly with wind speed Not only is this complex process difficult

to quantify but there are additional barriers to accurate analysis convectiod, raaiation and evaporation occur simultaneously across the

air to water iaterface

he evaporation process reduces the temperature

of the liquid qurface because it draws virtually all of the 1050 Btu/lb of water requiredl for the phase change from the pool water, not the air above it. The convective process cools the liquid surface if the air is cooler than the surface and wanns it if the air is wanner than the surface It should] be remembered that under conditions of moderately high

wind speed, low humidity, and low air temperature, the surface of the pool
will be cooled by both evaporation of water and convection.

This will have

a tendency to reduce the temperature difference between the pool surface and the wind sweeping over it Theoretically the pool surface can be (Practically, because of the

cooled to the wet-bulb temperature of the air

large quantity lof heat available to the pool surface from the pool itself this w i L l almost never occur.) However, under windy, low temperature

low humidity cOnditions you may wish to utilize a compromise pool surface temperature mid-way between measured pool temperature and wet-bulb

temperature of! the air or apply a correction factor as suggested on Page

2-14

The wet-bulb temperature may be read from Figure 2 . 2

Figure 2.2 Psychrometric Chart

EXAMPLE: ~ h (80F, 30' x

45' pool described in the first example is

exposed to a 16-mph 65OF north wind at 50% relative humidity

It is

protected by 4otel buildings on the north and surrounded by a 6 f t privacy fence. to 4 mph. These reduce the effective wind speed at the pool surface Ignore surface

Cdculate the convective heat loss in Btu/hr.

temperature dedression because of evaporation. 11 4(.3)] x (30' x 45') x (80

- 65O) = 44,550 Btu/hr

2.2.1.3

~adiatibn Losses .

The following formula is sometimes used to

evaluate losses p r o u g h radiation from a warm pool to a cool sky;

where

QR is thelradiation loss in Btu/hr

A
c

is the lexposed surface area of the pool in it2, is the lemissivity of pool water (Z 0.90

tw is the pool temperature in ORankine (OF + 460) Without in L Oduction of serious error, the value for tw may be assumed to be mating tSky .

tq

pool temperature.

Some judgment is called for in esti-

~ b example, r on a very cloudy night the clouds may be only

10F below the kernperamre of the air; the pool radiates to those clouds On a very clead night, because the pool radiates both to the clear atmosphere and to 4 t e r space, the effective sky temperature may be as much as 80F below temperature

It b d i f f i a t to select the proper sky temperature for use in this formula (unless you have access to a remote sensing infrared thermometer) Many exp(rts agree that, on average, the sky temperature is about However, on very clear

20F cooler tha# the ambient temperature nights, even

cool

areas of moderately high humidity such as Cocoa Beach

Florida, remote Isensing infrared thermometers pointed skyward have indicated a temper#ure below their lower limit (-40F), or at least 80F below ambient air tehperature Florida, they While very clear nights are infrequent in

common in many other parts of the country

For your convedience ,

OR))* I (radiation parameter) 1 0 0

values are presjnted in Table 2 . 2

Table 2.2 Radiation Parameter vs . Temperatures (OF) t(OF) Value t(OF) Value
t(OF)

Value t(OF) Value t( O F Value

EXAMPLE :

the previously described 30' x 45' pool which the motel

manager wishes1 to maintain at 80F, is exposed to clear skies on a 55OF night. The r h t i v e humidity is 50%, the cloud cover is Calculate the radiant heat loss

la, and

the

latitude is 30N

Because ofl a 10% cloud cover, moderate nighttime temperature (55OF), and fairly higq relative humidity, the sky temperature should be about 20F below ambknt air temperature W e w i l l try several sky temperatures

to see how they1 affect the estimated radiation loss

If we assl)ne the sky temperature to be 10F below the air temper-

ature, tSky

t+

1 0 F

From Table 21

= 210 @50
Assume: t sky 'air

6501 = 42,000 Btu/hr

20

Assume

Assume:

- 400
5991 = 71.5113

Assume:

tair 50

- SO0
The quantity of heat lost through evap-

- 4681 = 80,220

2.2.1.4 ~vapordtionLosses

oration from a boo1 surface usually exceeds that lost by conduction. convection, and rebadiation combined uate the loss:
I

A simple formula may be used to eval-

Lw

KE x AP

where :
is the1 evaporative heat loss in Btu/ftz * h r

L ,

is the( latent heat of evaporation of water at the temperature of

the 4 0 1 surface is tde

1050 Btu/lb, mass transfer coefficient expressed

appropriate

in

lb/hr lft2 (per lb/in2nP)

S

0.14 x hcv; hcv = 1 + . 3 x wind speed (mph)*

A P

is the partial pressure exerted by the pool surface minus the

p a r q pressure exerted by the moisture in the air (psi) As has b+n stated in the paragraph on convective losses, the pool

surface temper+ure is between the average temperature of the entire pool and that of th( air. When windy, cool, low-humidity conditions prevail,

pool's surfac *See

Appenv

C for methods of reducing the wind speed over the

the use of a p e l surface pressure corresponding to a compromise temperature between pool temperature and wet-bulb air temperature may yield more accurate besults or the correction factor on Page 2-14 may be applied. Figure 2. should be examined to envision better the nature of evapoThe vertical lines represent measured air or

ration from thd pool surface pool temperatu*~.

The horizontal lines represent partial pressures in psi The curved lines ex-

on the left ant in mm of mercury on the right.

tending upwarq and to the right represent relative humidity conditions The vapor prelsure of the pool surface at a specific temperature is found from the inter*ction 100% relative +dity sented by the *es of a vertical line through that temperature with the curve. The wet-bulb temperature of air is repre-

which slope down and to the right.

If a horiz(ntal line is drawn through the intersection of the 7SF air

temperature in( the 10% which results

relative humidity (RH) curve, any air condition

mm Hg and

4 4

a partial pressure lower than about 0.44 psi or about 22.8

allow evaporation to occur from a 7SF pool.

The greater
A i r that

the distance bblow that line, the more rapid the evaporation.

exerts the sam( partial pressure (for example 83OF air at 80% RH or 87OF

air at ?(Pb RH] will prevent evaporation from taking place from the pool
surface

i r which exerts more partial pressure ~ntegstingly enough, a

than 0.44 psi bay lose some of its water vapor to the pool by condensation.

I n this iairly unusual situation the pool w i l l gain 1050 Btu for each

pound of waterlvapor that condenses on its surface

EXAMPLE:

c g u l a t e the evaporative heat loss (in Btu/hr) from the 80F,

30' x 45' pool lpreviously considered if it is exposed to 6SF air a t 50%

relative humiditj sweeping over the water surface at 4 mph depression of s*face
9e

Ignore the

temperature caused by evaporation

= 1050(x 19 x 2.2 (.50

154 Btu/ft2-hr

15)

QE

= 154

(30 x 45)

= 207,900 Btu/hr

The values for

1~

may be read from Figure 2.2, where 0.50 psi corre-

sponds to 100% belative humidity at 80F, the partial pressure of the pool water, and 0.15lpsi corresponds to 65OF air a t 50% relative humidity Strictly sp#aking, the quantity of water evaporating from an exposed surface is not a linear function of the area of that surface.

W.J

Humphreys d o c b e n t s the fact in Physics of the Air, McGraw-Hill Book

Co. , Inc . , NY land London, 1940

However, the empirical equation used

above yields results within 5% of those from an equation developed by Fitzgerald in

late 1800s and recommended by Dr

Humphreys, a noted

meteorological p# ysicis t

2.3 A J D J U S T J N A THE CALCULATED VALUES

Measuremerlts made on swimming pools m Florida have convinced several FSEC *searchers that the calculated losses are about 4 0 % higher

than those thatloccur during typical Florida weather (if average pool and
air temperature4 are used in the calculations).

Consequently, it is FSEC's

recommendation b a t the calculated values be multiplied by a factor of 0.6

EXAMPLE

~ h d relationships among and totals for the previou~lycalcu-

lated losses are1

Conduction

$00

Btu/hr x 24 hrs x 0.6 = 30,240 (below-grade pool)

4tu/day
Convection: Radiation (assumed) Evaporation Total Losses conduction1 convection1 Radiation Evaporatiod

#,550 Btu/hr x 24 x 0.6 = 641,520 Btu/day $2,500 x 24 x 0.6 = 756,000 Btu/day; tSky = taip 20

#?,go0 x 24 x 0.6 = 2,993,760 Btu/day 4,421,520 Btu/day

= 0.6%
= 15%

= 17%
= 68%

2.4 DIRECT G A ~ N BY POOL SURFACE

Most s the day. d g pools are located so as to be in direct sunlight most of

u'ndir these conditions they are very effective heat collectors

absorbing about1 75% of the solar energy that strikes their surfaces

EXAMPLE

The average insolation of the surface of the pool in the pre-

vious example burkg November b 1300 Btu/ft2*day. Direct solar gain =

1300 x (30 x 4$ x .75 = 1,316,250 Btu/day gain. (A screen room reduces

t h i s input by 130-4066. ) Obviously, a sunny location not only increases

swimming g m f @

but also substantially reduces pool heating costs (by

nearly 1/3 d u d g November i n this example). The previ(us calculations indicate that the pool cited in the example
will require th( addition of 4,421,520

1,316,250 = 3,105,270 Btu/day to

Cold snaps or

maintain 80F t a t e r temperature during average weather

unseasonably wbrm weather obviously will alter daily energy requirements

The energk requirement for November w i l l average out at 3,105,170 Btu/day x 30 93 million Btu/mo. If natural gas costs $. 5l/therm, the

November fuel +sts w i l l average 93 x lo6 x $.51 100,000 x . 7 (heater efficiency)

= $677.57

if the pool is n+ther shaded nor enclosed by a screen room

If the

pool is

partially or totally shaded during a portion of the day,

the direct gain bhould be reduced proportionately