Michigan House Bills 4402-4405 Legislative Analysis - Proposes Abolishment of Juvenile Life Without Parole Sentences
Michigan House Bills 4402-4405 Legislative Analysis - Proposes Abolishment of Juvenile Life Without Parole Sentences
Michigan House Bills 4402-4405 Legislative Analysis - Proposes Abolishment of Juvenile Life Without Parole Sentences
Committee: Judiciary
Complete to 1-22-08
House Bills 4402-4404 would amend various acts to prohibit sentencing a juvenile
convicted of certain crimes to life without the possibility of parole and House Bill 4405
would revise parole eligibility for juveniles sentenced as adults. House Bills 4402, 4403,
and 4405 are tie-barred to each other and to House Bill 4404, but House Bill 4404 is not
tie-barred to the other three. Specifically, each bill would do the following:
House Bill 4402 would add a new section to the Michigan Penal Code (750.506b) to
specify that an individual who was less than 18 years of age at the time of committing a
crime could not be sentenced to imprisonment for life without parole eligibility for that
crime.
House Bill 4403 would amend Chapter XIIA of the Probate Code (MCL 712A.2d and
712A.18). Currently, if a juvenile is tried as an adult, the court may, after entering a
judgment of conviction and determining that the best interests of the public would be
served, impose any sentence upon the juvenile that could be imposed upon an adult
convicted of that crime. The bill would clarify that the sentence would have to be other
than imprisonment for life without parole eligibility. The bill would also make numerous
technical and editorial revisions.
House Bill 4404 would amend Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure (MCL
769.1 and 769.1b). Section 1 pertains to the authority of the court to pronounce judgment
against and pass sentence upon a person convicted in that court; a court must sentence a
juvenile convicted of certain crimes in the same manner as an adult, but has discretion in
other cases to either place the juvenile on probation and commit him or her to an
institution or agency described in the Youth Rehabilitation Services Act (a facility
operated by the Department of Human Services or a county juvenile agency) or to impose
any other sentence provided by law for an adult offender. Section 2 pertains to the court's
authority to determine whether the juvenile, after having been placed on probation and
committed to the juvenile justice system, has been rehabilitated and whether the juvenile
The bill would provide that in either of these situations, the court could not sentence an
individual who was less than 18 years of age at the time the crime was committed to
imprisonment for life without parole eligibility.
House Bill 4405 would amend the Corrections Code (MCL 791.234). Currently, a
prisoner sentenced to imprisonment for life without parole eligibility will die in prison
unless he or she receives a reprieve, a commutation, or a pardon from the governor. In
general, a person sentenced to life imprisonment who is eligible for parole may be placed
on parole after serving 15 years of his or her sentence. All others must serve at least their
minimum sentence before being eligible for parole.
The bill would revise the parole eligibility criteria for certain juveniles sentenced as
adults. Under the bill, an individual who had been less than 18 years of age when the
crime was committed would be eligible for parole after serving 10 years of his or her
sentence. This would apply to 1) juveniles sentenced to serve a minimum term of
imprisonment of 10 years; 2) juveniles sentenced to life imprisonment; and 3) juveniles
sentenced to life imprisonment without parole eligibility.
In determining whether to release a person on parole under these new provisions, the
parole board would have to consider all of the following:
• The individual's age and level of maturity at the time of the offense.
• The individual's degree of participation in the offense.
• The nature of the offense.
• The severity of the offense.
• Any prior juvenile or criminal history.
• The likelihood of the individual to commit further offenses.
• Any other information considered relevant by the parole board.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The bills could create savings for the Department of Corrections, and would have no
fiscal impact on local units of government. At present, limited data are available to
assess the potential fiscal impact of the bills.
• Forbid sentences of life without parole for offenders who were under age 18 at the
times of their offenses (HBs 4402, 4403, 4404). Savings would affect relatively
few prisoners and would begin to accrue upon the release of prisoners who
otherwise would have been sentenced to life without the possibility of parole.
New Sentences; Forbid Life without Parole for Offenders under Age 18
Over the past few years, the number of felons annually committed to the Department of
Corrections (MDOC) under sentences of life without the possibility of parole and who
were under age 18 at the times of their offenses have decreased from 10 in 2002 to 3 in
2005. Any savings would depend not only on the number of offenders who were
sentenced to parolable sentences instead of nonparolable life, but also on the time served
by those offenders, because savings would not begin to accrue until after the release of an
offender who otherwise would have been sentenced to nonparolable life. While the bills
would make such offenders eligible for parole after serving ten years, there are no data to
indicate what the average time to parole might be.
The numbers of prisoners released and consequent savings ultimately would depend on
parole board decisions on prisoners made eligible for parole. There are no data to
indicate how the parole board might respond to the prisoners made eligible by the bill.
The overall parole approval rate was about 52 percent in 2007. The parole approval rate
for violent offenders (other than sex offenders) was about 35 percent in 2006, the most
recent year for which such information is available. If 900 prisoners became eligible for
parole, and 25 to 35 percent of these were approved for parole, full-year savings under
■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does
not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.