Outsourcing Jobs (Cons)
Outsourcing Jobs (Cons)
Outsourcing Jobs (Cons)
htm
payable, marketing and sales, and human resources that exist in U.S.-grounded industries such as retailing, health care, and recreation. )ll of them could be shipped overseas in the name of cost-cutting. :rom ust-in-time inventories to nanosecond technologies, business practices now turn on a dime. )s soon as work can be made routine -- whether it6s reading an ;-ray or creating blueprints -- the ob can potentially be outsourced. That promises big, and often dis8uieting, changes ahead for many. !t means the career you studied for -- and spent oodles of tuition money on -- in college probably won6t sustain you for your working life. Someone in !ndia or "hina will be able to do it far more cheaply. )nother reason for the speed and si0e of this shift is the nature of service work, especially in our !nternet world. &anufacturers must spend years and billions of dollars erecting plants overseas and setting up distribution chains for supply and shipments before moving work offshore. %ut service obs need much less infrastructure. &any need only a desk, computer, and /et access. To be sure, much of today6s ob itters are rooted in this rudderless economy. %ut a structural change is also afoot that could result in a worsening ob picture <. or <= years down the road. 4verall, the global economy will do much better, but the U.S. workforce may face fre8uent career changes and downward pressures on wages through every part of the economy sub ect to competition from foreign labor. )nd that6s ust as baby boomers will be counting on younger workers to pay a lot of money into the Social Security fund. 7hat can be done now to prevent such a dreary outcome3 There are no 8uick or easy fixes. >egislation blocking obs from moving overseas would amount to <[email protected] protectionism. 9!t would be foolish to stop companies from outsourcing,9 says *obert %. *eich, former >abor Secretary under #resident %ill "linton. 9!t would make our companies less competitive.9 Some in "ongress suggest tax credits for companies who keep obs in the U.S. The risk there is that companies will extort bigger breaks -- even for positions they never plan to move. !nstead, more attention should be paid to educating the U.S. workforce. )merica is on the cutting edge of the information and technology economy. %ut others are catching up. !ndia and "hina award more natural science and engineering degrees than we do. The only way the U.S. will keep one rung ahead of the rest of the world is to ensure that we have a broadly educated workforce that keeps learning. )t the corporate level, training programs would help current employees move up to better positions. )nd the government should overhaul obless benefits to allow displaced workers the time and money to enter new careers. 4ptimists argue that the U.S. will keep its innovation lead because it has invented new products before. %ut that underestimates the risk of being overtaken as skill and education levels rise elsewhere. Unless we focus on maintaining a better-educated workforce, that risk will only rise. By Kathleen Madigan Business utlook !ditor Madigan still belie"es in free trade.