Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3K views

    Case Study 1.1 MegaTech, Inc.

    Uploaded by

    Osamu KT
    MegaTech, Inc. designs and manufactures automotive components. For years, the company enjoyed a stable marketplace, a small but loyal group of customers, and a relatively predictable environment. Though slowly, annual sales continued to grow until recently hitting $300 million. MegaTech products were popular because they required little major updating or yearly redesign. The stability of its market, coupled with the consistency of its product, allowed MegaTech to forecast annual demand accurately, to rely on production runs with long lead times, -and to concentrate on internal efficiency.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Case Study 1.1 MegaTech, Inc.

    Uploaded by

    Osamu KT
    3K views2 pages
    MegaTech, Inc. designs and manufactures automotive components. For years, the company enjoyed a stable marketplace, a small but loyal group of customers, and a relatively predictable environment. Though slowly, annual sales continued to grow until recently hitting $300 million. MegaTech products were popular because they required little major updating or yearly redesign. The stability of its market, coupled with the consistency of its product, allowed MegaTech to forecast annual demand accurately, to rely on production runs with long lead times, -and to concentrate on internal efficiency.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    MegaTech, Inc. designs and manufactures automotive components. For years, the company enjoyed a stable marketplace, a small but loyal group of customers, and a relatively predictable environment. Though slowly, annual sales continued to grow until recently hitting $300 million. MegaTech products were popular because they required little major updating or yearly redesign. The stability of its market, coupled with the consistency of its product, allowed MegaTech to forecast annual demand accurately, to rely on production runs with long lead times, -and to concentrate on internal efficiency.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    3K views2 pages

    Case Study 1.1 MegaTech, Inc.

    Uploaded by

    Osamu KT
    MegaTech, Inc. designs and manufactures automotive components. For years, the company enjoyed a stable marketplace, a small but loyal group of customers, and a relatively predictable environment. Though slowly, annual sales continued to grow until recently hitting $300 million. MegaTech products were popular because they required little major updating or yearly redesign. The stability of its market, coupled with the consistency of its product, allowed MegaTech to forecast annual demand accurately, to rely on production runs with long lead times, -and to concentrate on internal efficiency.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Case Study 1.

    47

    Case Study 1.1


    MegaTech, Inc.
    MegaTech, Inc. designs and manufactures automotive components. For years, the company enjoyed a stable marketplace, a small but loyal group of customers, and a relatively predictable environment. Though slowly, annual sales continued to grow until recently hitting $300 million. MegaTech products were popular because they required little major updating or yearly redesign. The stability of its market, coupled with the consistency of its product, allowed MegaTech to forecast annual demand accurately, to rely on production runs with long lead times, -and to concentrate on internal efficiency. Then, with the advent of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and other international trade agreements, MegaTech found itself competing with auto parts suppliers headquartered in countries around the world. The company was thrust into an unfamiliar position: It had to become customer-focused and quicker to market with innovative products. Facing these tremendous commercial challenges, top management at MegaTech decided a few years ago to recreate the company as a project-based organization. The transition, while not smooth, has nonetheless paid big dividends. Top managers determined, for instance, that product updates had to be much more frequent. Achieving this goal meant yearly redesigns and new technologies' which, in turn, meant making innovative changes in the firm's operations. In order to make these adjustments, special project teams were formed around each of the company's product lines and given a mandate to maintain market competitiveness. At the same time, however, MegaTech wanted to maintain its internal operating efficiencies. Thus all project teams were given strict cost and schedule guidelines for new product introductions. Finally, the company created a sophisticated research and development team, which is responsible for locating likely new avenues for technological change 5 to 10 years down the road. Today, MegaTech operates project teams not only for managing current product lines but also for seeking longer-term payoffs through applied research. MegaTech has found the move to projectrnanagement challenging. For one thing, employees are still rethinking the ways in which they allocate their time and resourCeS. In addi.. tion, the firm's success rate with new projects is still less than management had hoped. Nevertheless, top managers feel that, on balance, the shift to project management has given the company the operating advantage that it needed to maintain its lead over rivals in its globally competitive industry. "Project management;' admits one MegaTech executive, "is certainly not a magic pill for success, but it has started us thinking about how we operate. As a result, we are doing smarter things in a faster way around here:'
    Questions 1. What elements of the marketplace in which MegaTech operates led the firm to believe that project management would improve its operations? 2. What is it about project management that offers MegaTech a competitive advantage in its industry?

    Case Study 1.2


    The IT Department at Hamelin Hospital
    Hamelin Hospital is a large (700-bed) regional hospital in the northeastern United States. The information technology (IT) department employs 75 people and has an operating budget of over $35 million. The department is responsible for managing 30-40 projects, ranging from small (redesigning computer screens) to very large, such as multimilliondollar system development projects that can run for over a year. Hamelin's IT department has been growing steadily, reflecting the hospital's commitment to expanding its information storage and processing capacities. The two principal functions of the IT department are developing new software applications and maintaining the current information system. Project management is a way of life for the department. IT department jobs fall into one of five categories: (1) help-desk technician, (2) programmer, (3) senior

    0(
    programmer, (4) systems analyst, and (5) project manager. Help-desk technicians field queries from computer system users and solve a wide range of problems. Most new hires start at the help desk, where they can become familiar with the system, learn about problem areas, become sensitive to users' frustrations and concerns, and understand how the IT department affects all hospital operations. As individuals move up the ladder, they join project teams, either as programmers or systems analysts. Finally, five project managers oversee a constantly updated slate of projects. In addition, the workload is always being supplemented by new projects. Team personnel finish one assignment and then move on to a new one. The typical IT department employee is involved in seven projects, each at a different stage of completion. (continued)

    48

    Chapter 1 Introduction

    The project management system in place at Hamelin is well regarded. It has spearheaded a tremendous expansion of the hospital's IT capabilities and thus helped it to gain a competitive advantage over other regional hospitals. Recently, in fact, Hamelin began "farming out" its IT services on a fee-for-service basis to competing hospitals needing help with their records, administration, order entry systems, and so forth. Not surprisingly, the results have improved the hospital's bottom line: At a time when more and more health care organizations are feeling the effects of spiraling health care costs, Hamelin's IT department has helped the hospital sustain continuous budget

    increases, additional staffing, a larger slate of projects, and a track record of success. Questions
    1. What are the potential problems with requiring proj-

    ect team members to be involved in multiple projects at the same time? What are the potential advantages? 2. What are the benefits and drawbacks of starting most new hires at the heIp desk function? 3. Hamelin Hospital sells its IT services to competing hospitals. How does this situation create an additional determinant of project success?

    Internet Exercises
    1. Using your favorite search engine (Google, Yahoo!, etc.), type in

    the keywords "project" and "project management." Randomly select three of the links that come up on the screen. Summarize what you found. 2. The largest professional project management organization in the world is the Project Management Institute (PM!). Go to its Web site, www.pmi.org and examine the links you find. What are some of the links that suggest that project management has become a sophisticated and vital element in corporate success? Select at least three of the related links and report briefly on the content of these links. 3. Go to the PMI Web site and examine the link "Global Membership and Communities." What do you discover when you begin navigating among the various chapters and cooperative organizations associated with PMI? How does this information cause you to rethink project management as a career option? 4. Type www.pmi.org/AboutUs/Pages/case-study-library.aspx into your browser. Examine some of the cases included on the resulting page. What do they suggest about the challenges of managing projects successfully? The complexity of many of to day's projects? The exciting breakthroughs or opportunities that projects allow us to exploit? 5. Go to the Web site for the Software Engineering Institute of Carnegie Mellon University at www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/ documentsI94.reports/pdf/sr07.94.pdf and access the software process maturity questionnaire. What are some of the questions that IT companies need to consider when assessing their level of project management maturity? 6. Go to the Prentice Hall Web site supporting this text, www. prenhall.com/pinto. Internet Reading: Cook, C. R., and Pritchard, C. L. (1998), "Why project management?" in D. 1. Cleland (Ed.), The Project Management Field Guide. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 22-33. 7. Go to the Prentice Hall Companion Web site supporting this text, www.prenhall.com/pinto. Internet Reading: Morris, P. W. G. (1998), "Why project management doesn't always make business sense," Project Management, 4 (1),12-16.

    c. Project termination. d. Project communication. 2. Which of the following is the most critical component of the triple constraint? a. Time, then cost, then quality. b. Quality, then cost, then time. c. Scope. d. They are all of equal importance unless otherwise stated. 3. Which of the following best describes a project stakeholder? a. A team member. b. The project manager. c. Someone who works in an area affected by the project. d. All of the above are stakeholders. 4. All of the following are elements in the definition of a project, except: a. A project is time limited. b. A project is unique. c. A project is composed of unrelated activities. d. A project is undertaken for a purpose. 5. All of the following distinguish project management from other process activities, except: a. There are no fundamental differences between project and process management. b. Project management often mvolves greater certainty of performance, cost, and schedule. c. Process management operates outside of line organizations. d. None of the above correctly distinguish project from process management. Answers: 1. b--The majority of a project budget is spent during the execution phase; 2. d-Unless otherwise stated, all elements in the triple constraint are equally critical; 3. d-All of the examples listed are types of project stakeholder; 4. c-A project is composed of"interrelated" activities; 5. d-None of the answers given correctly differentiates "process" from "project" management.

    PMP Certification Sample Questions


    1. The majority of the project budget is expended upon:

    a. Project plan development. b. Project plan execution.

    You might also like