Get A Life, Holden Caulfield
Get A Life, Holden Caulfield
Get A Life, Holden Caulfield
But Holden may have bigger problems than the insults of irreverent parodists
and other “phonies,” as Holden would put it. Even as Mr. Salinger, who is 90
and in ailing health, seeks to keep control of his most famous creation, there
are signs that Holden may be losing his grip on the kids.
“The Catcher in the Rye,” published in 1951, is still a staple of the high school
curriculum, beloved by many teachers who read and reread it in their own
youth. The trouble is today’s teenagers. Teachers say young readers just don’t
like Holden as much as they used to. What once seemed like courageous truth-
telling now strikes many of them as “weird,” “whiny” and “immature.”
The alienated teenager has lost much of his novelty, said Ariel Levenson, an
English teacher at the Dalton School on Manhattan’s Upper East Side,
Holden’s home turf. She added that even the students who liked the book tend
to find the language — “phony,” “her hands were lousy with rocks,” the
relentless “goddams” — grating and dated.
Julie Johnson, who taught Mr. Salinger’s novel over three decades at New
Trier High School in Winnetka, Ill., cited similar reactions. “Holden’s passivity
is especially galling and perplexing to many present-day students,” she wrote
in an e-mail message. “In general, they do not have much sympathy for
alienated antiheroes; they are more focused on distinguishing themselves in
society as it is presently constituted than in trying to change it.”
Of course, Holden has always had his detractors. Harcourt Brace, the
publishing house that originally solicited “The Catcher in the Rye,” turned it
down, saying it wasn’t clear whether Holden was supposed to be crazy. Later,
highbrow critics like Joan Didion and George Steiner mocked his moral
shallowness and “relatability.”
But Holden won over the young, especially the 1960s generation who saw
themselves in the disaffected preppy, according to the cultural critic Morris
Dickstein. “The skepticism, the belief in the purity of the soul against the
tawdry, trashy culture plays very well in the counterculture and post-
counterculture generation,” said Mr. Dickstein, who
teaches at the Graduate Center of the University of
the City of New York. Today, “I wouldn’t say we have
a more gullible youth culture, but it may be more of
a joining or togetherness culture.”
Perhaps Holden would not have felt quite so alone if he were growing up
today. After all, Mr. Salinger was writing long before the rise of a multibillion-
dollar cultural-entertainment complex largely catering to the taste of teenage
boys. These days, adults may lament the slasher movies and dumb sex
comedies that have taken over the multiplex, but back then teenagers found
themselves stranded between adult things and childish pleasures.
Some critics say that if Holden is less popular these days, the fault lies with
our own impatience with the idea of a lifelong quest for identity and meaning
that Holden represents.
Ms. Feinberg recalled one 15-year-old boy from Long Island who told her:
“Oh, we all hated Holden in my class. We just wanted to tell him, ‘Shut up and
take your Prozac.’ ”