Refutation of Abu Basheer At-Tartoosee

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

© Copyright SalafiManhaj 2007

URL: www.SalafiManhaj.com
E-mail: [email protected]
Important Note:
The following document is an on-line book publishing of
www.SalafiManhaj.com. This book was formatted and designed
specifically for being placed on the Web and for its easy and
convenient distribution. Since this book was prepared for free on-line
distribution we grant permission for it to be printed, disbursed,
photocopied, reproduced and/or distributed by electronic means for
the purpose of spreading its content and not for the purpose of
gaining a profit, unless a specific request is sent to the publishers and
permission is granted.

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

ϪΑΎΘϛϲϓήϴμΑϲΑ΃ϰϠϋΩήϟ΍
ΕϮϏΎτϟ΍
ήϴϔϜΘϟ΍Δϟ΄δϣϲϓΔϴϤϠϋΙϮΤΑϭ

5HIXWDWLRQRI
$ERR%DVHHU
DW7DUWRRVHH
DQGKLV'HYLDWHG&RQFHSWVRI
7DDJKRRWDQG7DNIHHU

%\6KD\NK$ERR1RRUELQ+DVDQELQ
0XKDPPDGDO.XUGHH

7UDQVODWHGE\¶$EGXO+DTLEQ.RILLEQ.ZHVLDO$VKDQWL

6KDGK DQ1DVDDO IL¶U5DG¶DODD$KO XG
'DODDO +LZDDU DO0DG¶RR $EHH %DVHHU IHH .LWDDELKL µ7DDJKRRW¶ ZD %XKRRWK ¶,OPL\\DK IHH 0DV¶DODW LW
7DNIHHU

! "

#$%&' (
)
%#
*+%
'# ' ,,--'''++-#-#+./01


&217(176

) %2"34%)2
%%522%
22 66 ))77 " %866 28 39)
24)6%)6
%6 ) 4)96 28 92:6 " %6 9965) 46 "
"):2;9*442") 5%22266%%%2266
22 66 " ) 3 "6% ") 5 28 %6 6 ) 5 28
$%%522%&
2266 "6%9)) 5%6228
2%6 62 ) %6 )36 28 39) 5 7 2%6 %
;%996:696"
) 36 28 %6 %%66 % 28 %6 6296 28 2;96"56
%2"64)6:6%66296
896) 4)96 "" 5623)
) )4 3 "6% ") 5 28 %6 7) 5 28 ) &
<3896% 38=
2266&42 %")4%)2
%6 ) 4)96 28 322> <6:29%= 442") 5 %2 22
66



Indeed, all praise is due to Allaah, we praise Him, we seek His aid, and we ask for
His forgiveness. We seek refuge in Allaah from the evil of our actions and from
the evil consequences of our actions. Whomever Allaah guides, there is none to
misguide and whoever Allaah misguides there is none to guide. I bear witness that
there is no god worthy of worship except Allaah and I bear witness that
Muhammad is the servant and messenger of Allaah.
To proceed:
The youth of the Muslim Ummah have been tested today by ideas which are not
new ones but rather old ones which originated during the first generation of
Islamic history. These ideas have been revamped today by a group which
emerged from the school of thought of Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen [‘The Muslim
Brotherhood’] with Sayyid Qutb at the head. However, the Shayaateen from the
humans and Jinn have revived these ideas and beautified them, deceptively
dressing them in the gowns of Salafiyyah in order to deceive the Muslims. These
corrupted ideas and beliefs are not connected to Salafiyyah at all, rather they are
the ideas of the Khawaarij even if it is covered with something else, as the name
does not change the reality at all. They agree with the Khawaarij in making takfeer
of those who commit major sins and the reason for this goes back to a number of
issues: the dearth of knowledge and lack of understanding of the deen and of the
principles of the Divine Legislation in particular upon which da’wah to Allaah with
insight is based. They are misguided and they misguide others by not adhering to
the way of the believers and following their intellects and desires. Allaah has
blinded their insight, they went astray and they lead others astray.
The first spark of this group, as I mentioned previously, was during the time
of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) as reported by al-Bukhaaree and
Muslim via Abee Sa’eed al-Khudree (radi Allaahu ’anhu) wherein he said: When
the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) was dividing the booty, ’Abdullaah bin
Dhi’l-Khuwaysarah at-Tameemee came and said: “Be just O Messenger of Allaah!”
the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) replied “Woe to you! Who is just if I am
not just?” ’Umar (radi Allaahu ’anhu) said: “Shall I strike his neck (i.e. execute

him) O Messenger of Allaah?” The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) replied:

“Leave him, for he has companions whose prayer will make your prayer seem
significant and whose fasting will make your fasting seem insignificant. They will
pass through the deen like an arrow passes through its target. He would look at its
Iron head, but would not find anything ticking) there. He would then see at the
lowest end, but would not find anything sticking there. He would then see at its grip
but would not find anything sticking to it. He would then see at its feathers and he
would find nothing sticking to them (as the arrow would pass so quickly that
nothing would stick to it) neither excrement nor blood…” to the end of the
hadeeth.1
Then these ideas manifested another time and with a stronger image after the
death of the rightly guided Caliph ’Uthmaan bin ’Affaan (radi Allaahu ’anhu) and
their evil and harmful effects did not cease as their innovation increased with
some of them exceeding others until they will revolt with the Dajjaal. Then also
you should know that the Khawaarij are not particular to only those people that
are highlighted in the hadeeth which has just been mentioned. Shaykh ul-Islaam
Ibn Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah) stated:
They are not specified to only those people (meaning: those who revolted against
’Ali, radi Allaahu ’anhu) because it is highlighted in other hadeeth2 that they will
still revolt until the time of the Dajjaal and the Muslims have agreed that the
Khawaarij are not specified as only being that group.3
The Imaams of the deen generation after generation have extensively warned
against the dangers of this ideology from its initial spark and al-Bukhaaree
(raheemahullaah) had a chapter in his Saheeh entitled ‘The Killing of the

# <KDGHHWK+?@00=<KDGHHWK+A?1=
7UDQVODWRU¶V1RWH%
KDGHHWK
',³7KH\ZRXOGEHUHFRJQLVHGE\WKHSUHVHQFH
RIDEODFNPDQDPRQJWKHPZKRVHXSSHUDUPVZRXOGEHOLNHDZRPDQ
VEUHDVWRUOLNHDSLHFHRIPHDWDVLW
TXLYHUVDQGWKH\ZRXOGFRPHIRUWKDWWKHWLPHZKHQWKHUHLVGLVVHQVLRQDPRQJWKHSHRSOH$EX6DL
GVDLG
,WHVWLI\WRWKHIDFWWKDW,KHDUGLWIURPWKH0HVVHQJHURI$OODKPD\SHDFHEHXSRQKLPDQG,WHVWLI\WRWKH
IDFW WKDW
$OL E$EX7DOLE IRXJKW DJDLQVW WKHPDQG, ZDVZLWK KLP +H JDYH RUGHUVDERXW WKDW PDQZKR
ZDVVRXJKWIRUDQGZKHQKHZDVEURXJKWLQDQGZKHQ,ORRNHGDWKLPKHZDVH[DFWO\DVWKH0HVVHQJHURI
$OODKPD\SHDFHEHXSRQKLPKDGGHVFULEHGKLP´
B)%((( KDGHHWK
&UDGL$OODDKX¶DQKX

'C
#ZKRVHXSSHUDUPVZRXOGEHOLNHDZRPDQ

VEUHDVWRUOLNHDSLHFHRIPHDWDVLWTXLYHUV
0$O)DWDDZDDD+BE+1@?

Khawaarij and Deviants after the Proofs had been established on them’ and the
saying of Allaah,
ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵ϘΘ͉ϳ˴ Ύ͉ϣϢ˵Ϭϟ˴˴Ϧϴ͋Β˴ ϳ˵ ϰ͉ΘΣ˴ ˸Ϣϫ˵ ΍˴Ϊϫ˴ ˸Ϋ·˶˴Ϊ˸όΑ˴ Ύ˱ϣ˸Ϯϗ˴ ͉Ϟπ

˶ ϴ˵ ϟ˶˵Ϫ˷Ϡϟ΍˴ϥΎ˴ϛΎ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ
“And Allaah will never lead a people astray after He has guided them until
He makes clear to them what they should avoid.”
{at-Tawbah (9): 115}
Then he classified from Ali ibn Abee Taalib that he said: I heard from the
Messenger of Allaah that he said “A people will emerge at the end of time who will
be young in age and foolish minded and will have the speech of the best of creation.
Eemaan will not reach beyond their throats and they will pass through the deen just
like an arrow passes through its target, wherever you find them kill them because in
killing them is a reward on the Day of Judgement.”
Then know akhee Muslim: the issue of the Khawaarij is not only about the
matter of revolting against the leader, because the transgressors revolt against the
just and unjust leader without having to be ascribed to the Khawaarij. Because
they are transgressors they fight for their transgression and they have specific
rulings which the people of knowledge have mentioned in matters of fiqh etc. as
for the Khawaarij then their transgression is much wider as they revolt against the
rulers and the ruled after making takfeer of them, therefore, this is the issue of the
Khawaarij on the Ummah. As for those who call to revolt against the leaders today
who oppose the Messenger of Allaah’s clear and authentic forbiddance of
rebellion, are followers of the ideology of Sayyid Qutb who did not suffice with
only fighting the leaders rather they fight against the Islamic Ummah after making
takfeer of them for obeying the rulers, as they claim. They gain nearness to Allaah
by shedding Muslim blood, using their money and taking their honours. Shaykh
ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said: “The Khawaarij emerged and split the people of
Jama’ah and made their blood and wealth halaal.”
Our research here is a refutation of one of the Ruwaybidah who holds this
ideology today known as ’AbdulMun’im Mustaphaa Haleemah (Aboo Baseer at-

Tartoosee).1 He has authored a variety of books with well-known titles and he

uses explicit language which has not been seen before from the Usool of the Ahl

(WDNIHHUHH'' 9 ' 9+
$ & ) F UDKHHPDKXOODDK "C ' D(
(
) F
WDNIHHUHH PDQKDM+ ' µDOWDUWRVL¶ '

' µIDWDDZDD¶ ( G ( '
' '!!. ( ( #

F ) D ( '

$) + +#&$% &' ,,--'''+ ++ -
D µIDWZD¶ ' WLE\DDQ <WXJK\DDQ!=
' WDNIHHUHH' !.; $ D &
,
³>D@,WLVDUHJLPHWKDWGRHVQRWUXOHE\ZKDW$OODKKDVUHYHDOHGLQHYHU\DVSHFWRIOLIH
SDUWLFXODUDQGJHQHUDOUDWKHULWLVDUHJLPHWKDWUXOHVE\ZKDW$OODKUHYHDOHGLQFHUWDLQ
FDVHVWRWKHH[FOXVLRQRIRWKHUFDVHVLWEHOLHYHVLQSDUWRIWKH%RRNDQGGLVEHOLHYHVLQ
SDUW DQG WKLV PD\ EH QRWLFHG HDVLO\ E\ DQ\RQHZKR ZRXOG OLNH WR REVHUYH WKH 6DXGL
OHJDOV\VWHPDQGWKLVFRQWUDGLFWVPDQ\RIWKH6KDU
LWH[WVWKDWREOLJDWHUHIHUULQJWKH
MXGJHPHQWEDFNWRWKH%RRNDQGWKH6XQQDKLQHYHU\DVSHFWV´
(,
³>E@>F@ ,W LV D UDFLVW QDWLRQDOLVW UHJLPH WKDW DOOLHV RU RSSRVHV RQ WKH EDVLV RI UHODWLRQ
ZLWKWKHQDWLRQ,WGLYLGHVULJKWVDQGREOLJDWLRQVDPRQJWKHVODYHVRI$OODKRQWKHEDVLV
RIUHODWLRQZLWKWKH6DXGLQDWLRQDQGLWVERUGHUVDQGQRWRQWKHEDVLVRIUHODWLRQZLWK
WKH
$TLGDKDQGWKHUHOLJLRQLQWKHVDPHPDQQHUDVDQ\RWKHU$UDEUHJLPH$QGWKLVLV
FOHDU .XIU .XIU %DZDK DV WKH 6DXGL 3HUPDQHQW &RPPLWWHH DO/DMQDK DG'D
LPDK
IRU,IWD
KDYHWKHPVHOYHVVDLGLQRQHRIWKHLU)DWDZD«´
% (,
³$QGWKH\ZHUHFRUUHFWLQWKDWKRZHYHURXUTXHVWLRQWRWKHVHHVWHHPHGRQHVLVWKLV,V
QRWWKH6DXGLUHJLPHOLNHWKLV",VLWRWKHUWKDQZKDW\RXKDYHGHVFULEHG",VLWQRWWKDW
WKH.DILU=LQGHHTKHUHWLF6DXGL±EHFDXVHRIKLVQDWLRQDOLW\DQGKLVFRQQHFWLRQZLWK
WKH 6DXGL VWDWH ± HQMR\V FHUWDLQ ULJKWV IDYRXUV DQG SULYLOHJHV WKDW 6KD\NKXO,VODP
IURP RXWVLGH 6D
XGL\\DK GRHV QRW" 7KH SUREOHP RI VLQJOH XQPDUULHG ZRPHQ KDV
UHDFKHGLWVSHDN\HWDORQJZLWKWKDW±DFFRUGLQJWRWKHODZ±WKH6DXGLZRPDQLVQRW
DOORZHGWREHPDUULHGWRDPDQZLWKZKRVHUHOLJLRQDQGFKDUDFWHUVKHLVSOHDVHGLIKH
GRHVQRWEHORQJWRWKHERUGHUVRIWKH6DXGLQDWLRQDQGOLNHZLVHWKH6DXGLPDQLVQRW
DOORZHGWRPDUU\RXWVLGH6D
XGL\\DKXQWLOKHKDVUHDFKHGDFHUWDLQDGYDQFHGDJHDORQJ
ZLWK IXOILOOLQJ FHUWDLQ FRQGLWLRQV DQG DIWHU UHFHLYLQJ VSHFLDO UR\DO SHUPLVVLRQ IRU
ZKLFK$OODKKDVQRWVHQWGRZQDQ\DXWKRULW\´
8'',
³,WLVDUHJLPHZKLFKDORQJZLWKLWVDUP\KDVQRWVKRZQDQ\VXSSRUW±ZKHWKHUUHDORU
SUHWHQGHG±WRZDUGVDQ\RIWKHLPSRUWDQWLVVXHVIDFLQJWKH0XVOLPVWRGD\6KRZPHD
VLQJOH ,VODPLF -LKDGL PRYHPHQW WKDW ZLVKHG WR HVWDEOLVK DQ ,VODPLF OLIH LQ WKHLU


FRXQWULHVDQGOLIWWKHRSSUHVVLRQRIWKH7DZDJKHHWWKDWWKH6DXGLUHJLPHRULWVDUP\
QRWWKH0XVOLP6DXGLSRSXODWLRQ±SURYLGHGKHOSRUVXSSRUW"7HOOPH±LIRQO\RQFH±
WKDWWKH6DXGLUHJLPHDQGLWVDUP\KDYHHYHUVKRZQDQJHUIRUWKHVDNHRI$OODKDQGWKH

$TLGDK MXVW RQFH$ UHJLPH WKDW VKRZV QR DQJHU IRU WKH VDNH RI $OODK QRW HYHQ
RQFHDQGGRHVQRWVKRZDOOLDQFHDQGHQPLW\IRU$OODK
VVDNHQRWHYHQRQFHKRZFDQ
LWEHFDOOHG,VODPLF"+RZ"´
% '
µIDWZD¶,
³6RDOORIWKHVHIDFHVWRJHWKHU±DQGWKHUHDUHPDQ\PRUHWKDWZHKDYHQRWPHQWLRQHG±
EULQJ XV WR WKH FHUWDLQ FRQFOXVLRQ WKDW WKH 6DXGL UHJLPH LV DQ XQ,VODPLF .DILU
UHJLPH ,VODP LV LQ RQH YDOOH\ DQG WKH UHJLPH RI $O 6D
XG LV LQ DQRWKHU YDOOH\
/LNHZLVH HYHU\RQH ZKR VXSSRUWV SURWHFWV DQG GHIHQGV WKLV UHJLPH IURP DPRQJ WKH
NLQJVSULQFHVDQGRWKHUWKDQWKHPIURPWKHLUDVVRFLDWHVZKRFDUU\RXWWKHLUZLOOWKH\
DUHDOO.XIIDUDQGDSRVWDWHV$QGLWLVQRWEHILWWLQJIRUDQ\RQHZKRNQRZVWKHUHOLJLRQ
RI$OODKDQGZKRNQRZVWKHUHDOLW\RIWKLVUHJLPHDQGLWVVXSSRUWHUVWRGRXEWWKLVIDFW´

% D #(( <!=
( ³LJQRUDQWRIWKHLUUHDOLW\´ <
#'H (I!.=
³RQO\VHHWKHJRRGVLGHRI6DXGL$UDELD´
% '
D D
NKDDULML\\DK((,
³>@6RLILWLVVDLG'RHVWKH.XIURIWKHUHJLPHQHFHVVLWDWHJRLQJRXW.KXUXMDJDLQVW
LW"LHILJKWLQJLWDQGRYHUWKURZLQJLW,VD\<HVIURPWKH6KDU
LSHUVSHFWLYHLWLV:DMLE
REOLJDWRU\ WR JR RXW DJDLQVW LW KRZHYHU IURP WKH SUDFWLFDO SHUVSHFWLYH WKLV KDV
FHUWDLQFRQGLWLRQVVWDJHVDQGQHFHVVDU\SUHSDUDWLRQVDQG,GRQRWVHHWKDWLWVKRXOG
EHGRQHEHIRUHWKHIXOILOOPHQWRIWKHVHFRQGLWLRQVVWDJHVDQGQHFHVVDU\SUHSDUDWLRQV
$QG RQH RI WKHP LV WKDW WKH LGHD RI JRLQJ RXW DJDLQVW WKH .XIU UHJLPHV VKRXOG EH WKH
GRPLQDQW LGHD DPRQJ WKH PDMRULW\ RI WKH 0XVOLPV $QG XQWLO WKH WLPH WKDW WKHVH DUH
IXOILOOHGWKHUHLVQRREMHFWLRQDFFRUGLQJWRWKH6KDUL
DK±LI\RXILQGWKHDELOLW\DQGDUH
VDIHIURPDJUHDWHUHYLORFFXUULQJ±WRDFWLQJRQWKLVE\HOLPLQDWLQJ±RQDQLQGLYLGXDO
EDVLV ± WKRVH ZKRVH )LWQDK LV WKUHDWHQLQJ WKH ODQGV DQG WKH SHRSOH IURP DPRQJ WKH
UXOLQJ 7DZDJKHHW RI .XIU DQG LQMXVWLFH DQG SXWWLQJ WKH SHRSOH DQG WKH ODQG WR UHVW
IURP WKHP IRU HOLPLQDWLQJ RQH RI WKH UXOLQJ 7DZDJKHHW RI .XIU DQG LQMXVWLFH DQG
UHPRYLQJ KLP IURP WKH SDWK RI WKH SHRSOH LV HDVLHU WKDQ HIIHFWLQJ D UHEHOOLRQ DQG
RYHUWKURZLQJWKHHQWLUHUHJLPHDORQJZLWKDOORILWVVSHFLDORUJDQLVDWLRQV´
(C
( !
µIDWZD¶'
&& % D KDGHHWKC
(
(
)
VDODI (!!! ' !
9( && % < 9 '
9=
' 9 &+
' '

' + ) (
WDNIHHUHH + D

us-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah, relying on the statements of Sayyid Qutb. In addition to

this, he lies against the scholars and cuts up their texts, distorting them and
omitting some of their words. The result of this is corruption and opposing the
Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam)
and the understandings of the Imaams of the deen. The issue of ruling by other
than what Allaah has revealed is from the main vocab of the ideology of this
takfeeree and the most dangerous, because he applies takfeer to the rulers and the
ruled without explanation and accusing his opponents of irjaa’ and tajahhum
with no shame. The Khawaarij are well-known for this issue, al-Jassaas said: The
Khawaarij interpreted this verse,
ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those
who are disbelievers.”
{al-Maa’idah (5): 44}
…In order to make takfeer of the rulers who leave ruling by what Allaah has
revealed without rejection of it and they make takfeer on account of this of
everyone who disobeys Allaah out of major or minor sins.1
Abu’l-Madhfar as-Sama’aanee (raheemahullaah) said:

(' C 3
D$#& H'
'(I' !.
J

µ&RQGLWLRQV RI /D LODKD LO$OODDK¶ '
'
µ,VODPEDVHFRXN¶ µ7KH 3DWK WR 3DUDGLVH¶ '
1
('
(# H
I

( ) # GX¶DD
# ' D
(-KBAAAAA
+ (# H
I (
( ' ( L D( ( ( ( ! (
'
(.%( & G
D '
+%

WDZKHHG !!% *
$KNDDPXO4XU¶DDQD+B+10@

Baraa’ bin ’Aazib said, and it is also the saying of al-Hasan, ‘the verse is about the
Mushrikeen, Ibn ’Abbaas said: the verse is about the Muslims and the intent is kufr
less than kufr and I know that the Khawaarij use this verse as a proof and say
whoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed is a disbeliever. The people of
Sunnah say – he does not disbelieve by leaving off ruling.1
I also bring to attention that this man is not known for knowledge by the ’Ulama
and it is not known which under scholars be studied with. He only became
known after his opposition to the sayings of the major scholars from the noble
people of knowledge, as is said, “The opposer is known.” If you contemplate on
the condition of this man you will find the description of the Prophet (sallallaahu
alayhi wassallam) can be applied to him, just as what is mentioned in the hadeeth
of ’Ali ibn Abee Taalib (radi Allaahu ’anhu):
Hudathaa ul-Asnaan (young in age): a nickname for youth during early youth and
are not mature enough to know the truth.2
Sufahaa’ ul-Ahlaam (foolish minded): meaning: in intellect and “foolish” in that
they are deficient in intellect and are ignorant.
Imaam Maalik said “Knowledge is not taken from a person of desires who calls the
people to his desires.”3
He (i.e. Aboo Baseer) is not well-regarded from the angle of knowledge and
learning and he is not specialised in the sciences of the Divine Legislation as he
did not study with the well-grounded scholars who take their knowledge from the
Book and the Sunnah in line with the understanding of the Companions and those
who follow them. rather, he increased in misguidance by opposing the scholars
whose virtue has been testified to and he accuses the Shaykh, Muhaddith, al-
’Allaamah Muhammad Naasirudeen al-Albaanee (raheemahullaah) with Irjaa’ and
tajahhum.

7DIVHHUXO4XU¶DDQD+B+1B
B) C -DDPL¶XO8VRROIHH$KDDGHHWKDU5DVRROD+A+EB
0#0D¶ULIDW8ORRPXO+DGHHWK+0M

ͼΎ˱Αά˶ ϛ˴ Ύ͉ϟ·˶˴ϥϮ˵ϟϮ˵Ϙϳ˴ ϥ˶·˸ϢϬ˶ ϫ˶ ΍˴Ϯ˸ϓ΃˴˸Ϧϣ˶ ˵Νή˵ ˸ΨΗ˴ ˱ΔϤ˴ Ϡ˶ϛ˴ ˸Εή˴ Β˵ϛ˴ ͽ
“Mighty is the word that comes out of their mouths, they utter nothing but
a lie.”
{al-Kahf (18): 5}
Aboo Haatim ar-Raazee (raheemahullaah) stated: “The hallmarks of Ahl ul-Bidaa’

are to curse Ahl ul-Athar.” This was transmitted by Imaam al-Laalikaa’ee in Sharh
Usool ’I’tiqaad Ahl us-Sunnah, vol.1, p.39. Ibn ul-Qattaan said: “There is not an
innovator in this world except that he hates the Ahl ul-Hadeeth.”1
Aboo Baseer is ignorant of the fact, or feigns ignorance, or he is heedless, or
feigning heedlessness, that Shaykh Muhammad Naasiruddeen (raheemahullaah)
refuted Irjaa’ over a quarter of a century ago in his book ’Aqeedah Tahawiyyah:
Sharh wa Ta’leeq, p.66:
“Eemaan is attestation of the tongue and belief of the heart:
This is the madhdhab of the Hanafiyyah and Matureediyyah in contrast to the Salaf
and the majority of the Ummah such as Maalik, ash-Shaafi’ee, Ahmad, al-Awza’ee
and other than them. Indeed, they added to the attestation and belief: action of the
pillars and the difference between the two madhdhabs is not an artificial one, then
how can it be correct that the stated difference is an artificial one while they permit
the most degenerate one from amongst them to say: “My eemaan is like the eemaan
of Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq”?! Rather similar to the Prophets, Messengers, Jibraa’eel,
Mikhaa’il, may the peace and blessings of Allaah be upon them all?!! How can it be
while they, in accordance with this madhdhab of theirs, do not permit anyone of
them, no matter if he is a disobedient degenerate, to say: “I am a believer, if Allaah,
the Most High, wills” instead he says: “I am truly a believer”?!
While Allaah says:
˵ϪΗ˵ Ύ˴ϳ΁˸ϢϬ˶ ˸ϴϠ˴ϋ

˴ ˸Ζϴ˴ Ϡ˶Η˵ ΍˴Ϋ·˶ϭ˴ ˸ϢϬ˵ Α˵ Ϯ˵Ϡϗ˵ ˸ΖϠ˴Ο ˶ ϭ˴ ˵Ϫ˷Ϡϟ΍˴ήϛ˶ Ϋ˵ ΍˴Ϋ·˶˴Ϧϳ˶άϟ͉΍˴ϥϮ˵Ϩϣ˶ ˸ΆϤ˵ ˸ϟ΍Ύ˴Ϥϧ͉·˶ͽ
ٌϥ ˴ Ϯ˵Ϡϛ͉ Ϯ˴ Θ˴ ϳ˴ ˸ϢϬ˶ Α͋έ˴ ϰ˴Ϡϋ ˴ ϭ˴ Ύ˱ϧΎ˴Ϥϳ˶·˸ϢϬ˵ ˸ΗΩ˴ ΍˴ί
ٌϥ
˴ Ϯ˵Ϙϔ˶ Ϩ˵ϳ˸Ϣϫ˵ Ύ˴Ϩ˸ϗί˴ έ˴ Ύ͉Ϥϣ˶ ϭ˴ ˴Γϼ
˴μ
͉ ϟ΍˴ϥϮ˵Ϥϴ˶Ϙϳ˵ ˴Ϧϳ˶άϟ͉΍

) ¶$THHGDWXV6DODI$VKDDEXO+DGHHWK+AB+?0

ٌΎ̒ϘΣ
˴ ˴ϥϮ˵Ϩϣ˶ ˸ΆϤ˵ ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΃˵
“Indeed the believers are those who when Allaah is mentioned their hearts
tremble and when His verses are recited to them it increases them in eemaan
and upon their Lord do they place their trust. Those who establish the
prayer and spend out of what we have provided them with. Those are truly
the believers.”
{al-Anfaal (8): 2-4}
On the basis of all of this they have exceeded the proper boundaries in their
fanaticism so they stated that whoever makes Istithnaa’ regarding Eemaan then he
has disbelieved. They built upon this that it is impermissible for the Hanafee to
marry a Shaafi’ee woman! Some of them overlooked this, they claimed, it is
permissible but not the opposite and the reasons for that is his statement that she is
given the status of the people of the book! I know an individual from the Hanafee
scholars whose daughter was proposed to by a man form the Shaafi’ee scholars so
he rejected it saying: “if only you were not a Shaafi’ee.” Consequently, after all
this is there any place for doubt that the point of difference is haqeeqee?! Whoever
wants elaboration upon this issue then let him refer to the Shaykhul-Islaam ibn
Taymiyyah’s book al-Eemaan for indeed it is the best of what has been authored
regarding this topic.”1
Many of the Muslim youth today have been deceived by this man (Aboo Baseer at-
Tartoosee) and have begun to regurgitate what he says and give in to what he
spreads without proof and evidence. So as a result, I deemed it necessary that a
refutation of this man be written and about how he transgresses against the
Sunnah and its Imaams in a way which necessitates the pen to be unleashed
unrepentantly. What can be observed about this man is:
9His ignorance of the sciences of the Divine Legislation and a lack of fiqh in
the deen.
9His misguidance in the manhaj of correct deductions and extracting
deductions from the texts and referring them back to what they do not
indicate, void of principles from the Divine Legislation. He is also ignorant

8
(( &5
,
,--'''+
C+ -
-% C2
% 6N #+

of the understandings of the Salaf and has a lack of concern with the
principles of deduction from the point of the general, specific, absolute,
restricted and the likes. He also has a lack of consideration for the
principles of weighing up the benefits and harms (of situations).
9Unrestricted takfeer without taking into consideration the principles of the
Divine Legislation and without fiqh and verification in making takfeer of the
leaders and the ruled. He has a lack of differentiating between an original
disbeliever and one who is attached to Islaam and has established the 2
Shahaadahs and establishes some of the symbols of Islaam while falling
into some actions of the disbelievers.
9His mixing between absolute and general takfeer and specific takfeer and a
lack of differentiating between the two.
9His ignorance of the issues related to the excuse of ignorance wherein the
proof has to be established upon a person except if it is more than likely
that the person is excused.
9His reliance on Sayyid Qutb’s takfeeree statements and his books and upon
others with deviant manhaj.
9His taking the lead in affairs of da’wah and commanding the good and
forbidding the evil with no knowledge, fiqh or experience!
9Bad manners with the ’Ulama and Mashaayikh and cursing them.
9His entry into dangerous issues and matters which are only understood by
the scholars.
9His searching out the errors of the scholars and notables, yet at the same
time he is quiet about the misguidance and deviance of those who fell into
major innovation such as Sayyid Qutb and his brother Muhammad Qutb
and those who reel around them.
Finally I say to you (O Abaa Baseer!) fear Allaah and safeguard your ignorance
and repent to your Lord and if not then keep quiet! Now on to our refutation of
some of his statements or rather of his tremors and ignorance and Allaah is the
One who guides to the truth by His Permission.

$ 7 7 $ $ * + 2 2 7
This is the title of one of his books and within it he relied on the statements of
1
Sayyid Qutb as Aboo Baseer transmits a number of issues from Qutb’s books. He
is thus greatly influenced by Sayyud Qutb and has intense love for Sayyid Qutb
and this is manifest by his great use of Sayyid’s words. If a person falls in love
with something his love blinds him from anything else and he becomes deaf to
listening to anything else. How can one be upon the true manhaj when one bases
his book on the school of thought of Sayyid Qutb who has strange views of the
Sunnah and resembles the ideology of the Khawaarij?? Those Qutbees have no
relation at all to the Imaams of the Salaf such as Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn ul-Qayyim
and others even though they claim to, but this claim is only to misguide people.
The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) said,
ϒϠΘΧ΍ΎϬϨϣήϛΎϨΗΎϣϭϒϠΘ΋΍ΎϬϨϣϑέΎόΗΎϤϓˬΓΪϨΠϣΩϮϨΟΡ΍ϭέϷ΍
“The souls are like recruited soldiers, those that recognise each other will come
2
together and those that do not recognise each other will not come together.”
Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah stated:
ϻϭϚϟΫϲϓϪϟϮγέϭͿΎϣήπΤΘδϳϼϓϪϤμϳϭϯϮϬϟ΍ϪϴϤόϳϯϮϬϟ΍ΐΣΎλϭ
ϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ΎοήϟϰοήϳϻϭˬϪΒϠτϳεϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ΐπϐϟΐπϐϳϻϭεϞΑˬ
ϩ΍ϮϬΑϪϟΐπϐϳΎϣϞμΣ΍Ϋ·ΐπϐϳϭϩ΍ϮϬΑϩΎοήϳΎϣϞμΣ΍Ϋ·ϰοήϳ
The person of desires is blinded and deafened by his desires…he is not pleased for
the pleasure of Allaah and His Messenger, he is not angered for the sake of Allaah
and His Messenger, rather he is pleased if his desires are fulfilled and is angered if
his desires are upset.3

1

'
µ,VODPEDVHFRXN¶ µ7KH 3DWK WR 3DUDGLVH¶ '
1E
(D ( #
WDDJKRRW!. (³<RXUVFKRODUVNQRZWKH
PHDQLQJ RI WDDJKRRW DQG \RX KDYH QR H[FXVH RI LJQRUDQFH WKH PRPHQW \RX ZRUN RQ WKHLU
EHKDOI\RXKDYHQRWFRPHZLWKWKHPHDQLQJRI.XIUEL¶W7DDJKRRW´% *
B #
00LQKDDMXV6XQQDKD+M+BM?

This is what we observe from Aboo Baseer’s writings as he revives every

misguidance of Sayyid Qutb such as:
9
Reviling the Prophet Moosaa (alayhis-salaam)
9
Denying the Attributes of Allaah
9
Socialism
9
Wahdat ul-Wujood
9
The Qur’aan being created
9
Abusing the Companions
9
Making takfeer of Muslim societies
Confusion about the miracles of the Prophet
9
9
Considering the Qur’aan in light of music, theatrics and cinema
9
Rejecting ahead narrations into ’aqeedah
9
Reviling the scholars and those who the Ummah have attested to their
knowledge, virtue and understanding.

They are free from him and to Allaah is the complaint! Even if this man (i.e. Aboo
Baseer) at times tries to extract proofs via referring to the statements of the
scholars when it agrees with his desires, the manhaj of the people of innovation
in extracting proofs is that when they find a saying of the scholars of the true
manhaj which apparently agrees with their desires they run with it and rely on it,
even if the scholar has a second saying which clarifies the issue that is found
within another subject in the scholar’s works. Ash-Shaatibee (raheemahullaah)
stated:
The hallmark of this affair is to reject a different opinion….and having partisanship
to what he is upon without referring to anything else. This is the origin of following
desires and if following of desires is manifest then it is truly censured and sin is
gained as a result.
I say: This man (Aboo Baseer at-Tartoosee) and those like him from the people of
desires use the proofs of the Divine Legislation according to their desires, this does
not mean that they are people who follow the proofs because they make their
desires the reference point and the proofs have to fall in line with their desires.
The texts of the Divine Legislation contain that which is unspecific and it is

possible to interpret them in ways which are not intended from the speech of
Allaah and His Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam). If this is combined with
ignorance, as it the condition of this man (Aboo Baseer) and his likes, of the
principles of the Divine Legislation and a lack of understanding its intended
meanings. In this case, it is possible that the extraction of proofs and
understanding will be not as how Allaah and His Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi
wassallam) intended. Ash-Shaatibee said:
ϞϴϟΪΑϪΘϋΪΑϰϠϋΪϬθΘδϳϮϫϭϻ·ΔϠϤϟ΍ϰϟ·ΐδϨϳϦϤϣ˱ΎϋΪΘΒϣΪΠΗϻϚϧ΃ϚϟΫϰϠϋϞϴϟΪϟ΍ϭ
ΩήϣϻϲΘϟ΍ΔϴϟίϷ΍ΔϤϜΤϟ΍ϲϓΖΑΎΛήϣ΃ϮϫϭˬϪΗϮϬηϭϪϠϘϋϖϓ΍ϭΎϣϰϠϋϪϟΰϨϴϓϲϋήη
ϰϟΎόΗϝΎϗ˭ΎϬϟ
The evidence for this is that you will not find an innovator who ascribes himself to a
religion except that they try to use a Divinely Legislated proof for their innovation
and they refer such proofs back to their own intellects and desires. This is verified
in the eternal wisdom which cannot be rejected, Allaah says
ͼ΍˱ήϴ˶Μϛ˴ ˶ϪΑ˶ ϱ˶Ϊ˸Ϭϳ˴ ϭ˴ ˱΍ήϴ˶Μϛ˴ ˶ϪΑ˶ ͊Ϟπ

˶ ϳ˵ ͽ
“He misleads many thereby and guides many thereby.”
{al-Baqarah (2): 26}
ϝΎϗϭ
And Allaah says,
ͼ˯Ύ˴θϳ˴ Ϧ˴ϣϱ˶Ϊ˸Ϭϳ˴ ϭ˴ ˯Ύ˴θϳ˴ Ϧ˴ϣ˵ϪϠ͉ϟ΍͊Ϟπ

˶ ϳ˵ ˴Ϛϟ˶ά˴ ϛ˴ ͽ
“Thus does Allaah leave astray whom He wills and guides whom He wills.”
{al-Mudathhir (): 31}
˷ϝΩ΃ϮϫϭˬήϴΜϜϟ΍ϻΎϬϨϣϞϴϠϘϟ΍ϭˬ΢ο΍Ϯϟ΍ϻΎϬϨϣΔϬΑΎθΘϤϟ΍ΔϟΩϷ΍ϦϣϢϬϟϕΎδϨϳΎϤϧ·˭ϦϜϟ
ˬϖΤϟ΍ϮϬϓϩήϫΎψΑήϣ΃ϰϠϋϝΩ΍Ϋ·ΔϟΩϷ΍ϦϣέϮϬϤΠϟ΍ϭϢψόϤϟ΍ϥΈϓ˭ϯϮϬϟ΍ωΎΒΗ΍ϰϠϋϞϴϟΪϟ΍
ϰϟ·ϞϴϠϘϟ΍ΩέήϫΎψϟ΍ϖΤϟ΍ϦϣϥΎϜϓˬϞϴϠϘϟ΍ϭέΩΎϨϟ΍ϮϬϓϑϼΨϟ΍ϩήϫΎχΎϣϰϠϋ˯ΎΟϥΈϓ
ΚϴΣϦϣϪϴΗϲϓϮϬϓˬϪϐϳίͿ΍Ω΍έ΃ϦϤΑύ΍ίϯϮϬϟ΍ϥ΃ήϴϏˬ΢ο΍Ϯϟ΍ϰϟ·ϪΑΎθΘϤϟ΍ϭήϴΜϜϟ΍
ήΧ΃ϭϪΒϟΎτϣϝϭ΃ϖΤϟ΍ϰϟ·Δϳ΍ΪϬϟ΍ϞόΟϪϧΈϓ˭ωΪΘΒϤϟ΍ήϴϏϑϼΨΑ˭ϖϳήτϟ΍ϰϠϋϪϧ΃Ϧψϳ
ϱάϟ΍ΐϠτϟ΍ϲϓ˱ΎΤο΍ϭΏΎΘϜϟ΍ϢψόϣϭΔϟΩϷ΍έϮϬϤΟΪΟϮϓˬϊΒΘϟΎΑϪϠόΠϓ˰ϥΎϛϥ·˰ϩ΍Ϯϫ

ϻϭϪϤϠϋϰϟ·ϪϠϜϳϥ΃Ύϣ΃ϭˬϪϴϟ·ϩΩήϳϥ΃Ύϣ΄ϓϚϟΫϦϋϪϟάηΎϣϭˬΓΩΎΠϟ΍ΪΟϮϓˬϪϨϋΚΤΑ
ϪϠϳϭ΄ΗϦϋΚΤΒϟ΍ϒϠϜΘϳ
However, they refer to the unspecific verses and not the clear verses with rare
marginal understandings and not the understandings of the majority, a telling proof
of following desires. This is because most of the evidences which are understood
apparently are true and what is taken apparently opposes those rare marginal
understandings. So it is the haqq to refer to what is apparent in order to return the
marginal understandings back to the majority view and to return the unspecific
verses back to what is clear. This is as opposed to allowing his desires to dictate
and deviate from what Allaah has intended and lead him to think that he is on the
right path. In this way seeking the truth is primary and one’s desires is put at the
rear, so that he follows and finds that the most of the evidence and the Book is
clear in seeking what he is looking for.1
I say: The books of Sayyid Qutb contain major innovations and much falsehood
and such beliefs are more dangerous to the youth than poisoned fruit and
weapons of mass destruction! Because they destroy the creed and actions, so until
when will this extremism for Sayyid, his personality, writings and ideas continue?!
Jamaa’at ut-Takfeer, Jama’at ul-Jihaad, Jama’at ut-Tabayyun wa’t-Tawaqquf, the
Suroorees and the Qutbees only began and developed based on the ideas of
Sayyid Qutb. If a youth wants to practice Islaam these groups refer him to the
books of Sayyid Qutb, this is what we see and this is attested to by some virtuous
people and others who used to be with them and even from the likes of Yoosuf
al-Qaradaawee, Fareed ’AbdulKhaaliq, ’Ali Jareeshah and other friends of Sayyid
Qutb who have warned from the ideology of Sayyid Qutb at-Takfeeree and their
statements will be mentioned to you shortly. So have you awoken from your
heedlessness O you who have raised Sayyid to the level of the Prophet
(sallallaahu alayhi wassallam), so read with justice his books and how they are
filled with innovation and misguidance! Then warn the youth from the manhaj of
this man, how long will this partisanship go on for? Shaykh ul-Islaam says:

&6 < +=DO¶,¶WLVDDPD++JJJE+

ϻϭΎϫΎϨόϣϥϮϓήόϳϻ˯΍Ϯϫ΃ϞΟϷ˱ΎϣϮϗϥϮπϐΒϳϭ˱ΎϣϮϗϥϮΒΤϳϦϳήϴΜϛ˱ΎϣϮϗΪΠΗ΍άϬϟϭ
ϲΒϨϟ΍Ϧϋ˱ΎΤϴΤλ˱ϼϘϧΔϟϮϘϨϣϥϮϜΗϥ΃ήϴϏϦϣϥϭΩΎόϳϭ΃ˬΎϬϗϼσ΍ϰϠϋϥϮϟ΍ϮϳϞΑˬΎϬϠϴϟΩε
ΎϫΎπΘϘϣϭΎϬϣίϻϥϮϓήόϳϻϭˬΎϫΎϨόϣϥϮϠϘόϳϢϫ΍ϮϧϮϜϳϥ΃ήϴϏϦϣϭˬΔϣϷ΍ϒϠγϭ
For this reason you will find that many people love a people, or hate a people, due
to desires which they neither understand nor have evidence for. Rather they have
allegiance based on these desires or they have enmity based on these desires which
are neither transmitted correctly from the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam)
nor from the Salaf of the Ummah and without themselves thinking about the
intended meanings of these evidences when they really do not know what they are
based on.1
Then this man (Aboo Baseer) comes and extracts evidences for Sayyid Qutb’s
sayings and the sayings of his brother Muhammad Qutb in the dangerous issue of
haakimiyyah and establishing the Divine Legislation of Allaah on the earth, in
Allaah we place our trust and He is the Best Guardian. Here we must stop at the
manhaj of Sayyid Qutb as we realise that it is also the manhaj of this man (Aboo
Baseer)! For the hearts resemble each other and the path is one and the same, as
is said,
Birds of a feather,
flock together

$%22 %$6((5 +$$.,0,<<$+ $1' 7$.)((5 2)
086/,062&,(7,(6
Aboo Baseer and those who reel around him from the Khawaarij of the era who
talk in the name of concern for Islaam, have no doubt been affected by the old
innovation of making takfeer due to sins and they went overboard in accusing the
Muslims of kufr to an extent which even the original Khawaarij did not reach! If
the original Khawaarij were distinguished by being the first to depart from the

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+BA+?0

Prophetic methodology then the grand-children of the Khawaarij today have

1
mixed this with the ideas of Machiavelli!
Aboo Baseer and his likes request that the rulers rule by what Allaah has
revealed and make takfeer of them if they rule by other than it,2 yet the likes of
Aboo Baseer do not judge by what Allaah has revealed in understanding the texts!!
May Allaah suffice us from this false propaganda! Does not the disputed allegation
about the tawaagheet apply to yourselves and make to become tawaagheet in that
you have made for yourselves oppressive regulations and you abuse and curse the
’Ulama and imagined them to have irjaa, tajahhum, a lack of explaining the truth,
sitting with the rulers, being employees, spies and arguing on behalf of “the
tawaagheet” and other void accusations?
The main reason for the deviation is their putting their desires before the texts
and putting their own selves before the people of knowledge. They were
preceded by Dhu’l-Khuwaysarah as he was the first to object to the Prophet
3
(sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) saying “Be just O Messenger of Allaah!” Imaam
Ahmad reported in his Musnad that a man from ’Abd Aalaaf who was with the
Khawaarij and then left them: The Khawaarij entered a village and ’Abdullaah bin
Khabbaab came out and said to them “By Allaah, you have frightened me.’ They
said ‘Are you ’Abdullaah ibn Khabbaab the companion of the Messenger of
Allaah?’ he replied: ‘yes.’ They said: ‘Did you hear any hadeeth from your father
that he had reported from the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi
wassallam)?’ He replied ‘Yes, I heard him report from the Messenger of Allaah that
he said that during fitna ‘The one who is sitting is better than the one who is
standing, the one who is standing is better than the one who is walking, the one
who is walking is better than the one who is running.’’ Then they asked him if he

O D ' 1?@ 46 MBJ 46 # 7KH 3ULQFH ' (

D +; # D '
D )
( H C

I ( ' #
D +

A

'
µ,VODPEDVHFRXN¶ µ7KH 3DWK WR 3DUDGLVH¶ ' ³WKH\ KDYH QR
HHPDDQLIWKH\GRQRWUXOHE\$OODDKLQDOODVSHFWVRIOLIH´% *
0# <?@00=<A?0=

was present during the arbitration between ’Ali and Mu’awiyah and when he
replied that he was present they ruled that he was a disbeliever due to being
present and they chopped off his head. Then they took the pregnant mother of his
child and cut open her stomach killing her and tearing out the unborn baby.1
The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) spoke the truth when
he said “they kill the people of Islaam and leave the idol-worshippers.” I say: What
is with you that you do not listen to, or study, the true manhaj of the people of
truth and go to them, take from them and take the lead based on their views so as
to stop your harm to Islaam and the Muslims and so as not to combine both the
oppression of the enemies and the confusion of Islaam’s children. In this way the
Khawaarij became famous by blood-shed without a care and they used to be
ready in waiting stopping people in the highways and no one was safe from them.
When they used to leave a place it was as if they did not differentiate between
those who deserve to be punished and those who did not because hey viewed
everyone who opposed them as having no weight in terms of their blood and in
this way they left off the Sunnah of guidance and followed the leaders of
oppression.
Aboo Baseer stated in his book at-Taaghoot:
ΰϋͿΪΒϋϮϬϓͿ΍ωήηϰϟ·ΔϣΎόϟ΍ϭΔλΎΨϟ΍ϪΗΎϴΣϥϭΆηϊϴϤΟϲϓϢϛΎΤΘϳΪΒόϟ΍ϥΎϛϥ·
ϪΗΎϴΣΕΎϴ΋ΰΟϦϣΔϴ΋ΰΟϲϓϮϟϭ˰ήϴϐϟ΍΍άϫϥΎϛ˱Ύϳ˷ ΃˰ϩήϴϏωήηϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϳϥΎϛϥ·ϭˬϞΟϭ
ϢϜΤϟ΍ϥ΃ϚϟΫήγϭˬΓΩΎΒόϟ΍Ώ΍ϮΑ΃ϊγϭ΃ϦϣϪΗΩΎΒϋϲϓϞΧ΍Ωϭήϴϐϟ΍΍άϬϟΪΑΎϋϮϬϓ
ϩΎϋΩ΍ϦϤϓˬΔϴϬϟϹ΍ΕΎϴλϮμΧκΧ΃ϦϣήΒΘόϳϦϳί΍ϮϤϟ΍ϭϢϴϘϟ΍ϭϦϴϧ΍ϮϘϟ΍ϦγϭϊϳήθΘϟ΍ϭ
ˬ˱ϼϤϋϭ˱ΎλΎμΘΧ΍ϪδϔϨϟΎϬϤϋίϭˬΔϴϬϟϹ΍ϰϋΩ΍ΪϘϓϞΟϭΰϋͿ΍˰ϊϣϭ΃˰ϥϭΩϦϣϪδϔϨϟ
ϖΤϟ΍΍άϬΑϪϟήϗ΃ϦϣϲϟΎΘϟΎΑϭˬϪΗΎϴλϮμΧκΧ΃ϲϓϞΟϭΰϋͿ˱΍ΪϧϪδϔϧϦϣϞόΟϭ
ϭ΃ϢϠϋˬήϘϳϢϟϡ΃ϚϟάΑήϗ΃Ϳ΍ϥϭΩϦϣϪΗΩΎΒϋϲϓϞΧ΍ΩϮϬϓ˰Ϳ΍ϊϣϭ΃ϥϭΩϦϣ˰ϢϛΎΤΗϭ
ϞϬΟ
“If the servant of Allaah judges in all affairs of his life, specifically and
generally, by the Divine Legislation of Allaah, then he is a servant of Allaah.
If he judges by another legislation, whatever it may be, even in an aspect of
his life, then he is a servant of that and included as a worshipper of it. This is

D+M+A

because judgement, legislation and making laws is considered to be the most
unique quality of divinity, so whoever calls to himself other than, or with, Allaah
has called to divinity and claimed for himself a particular unique quality and action
and has made himself a partner with Allaah in the most unique quality. Following
on from this, whoever goes along with this and refers judgement, to other
than or with Allaah, has entered into the worship of him other than Allaah.
This is whether a person acknowledges this or not, knowingly or
ignorantly.”1
I say: This kind of speech is mere emotion and incitement which Aboo Baseer has
taken from Sayyid Qutb wherein he said:
ϲϓϥΎϛϥ·ϭϙήθϣϮϫΎϤϧΈϓˬΓήϴϐλΔϴ΋ΰΟϲϓϮϟϭˬϪδϔϧΪϨϋϦϣΔόϳήηϲϓ˱΍ήθΑωΎσ΃Ϧϣϥ·
ϥ΃ΪϬη΃ϝϮϘϳϚϟΫ˴ΪόΑϲϘΑΎϤϬϣϙήθϟ΍ϰϟ·ϡϼγϹ΍ϦϣΎϬΑΝήΧΎϤϧΈϓ˭ΎϬϠόϓϢΛ˱ΎϤϠδϣϞλϷ΍
Ϳ΍˴ήϴϏ˵ϊϴτϳϭˬͿ΍˶ήϴϏϦϣϰϘϠΘϳΎϤϨϴΑˬϪϧΎδϠΑͿ΍ϻ·Ϫϟ·ϻ
“Whoever obeys a man in legislating, even in a small aspect, is a Mushrik
even if the person is a Muslim and then does it, he has left Islaam for shirk
despite whatever may remain of him saying ‘Ashadu an la ilaha il-Allaah’
with his tongue, because he has accepted other than Allaah and obeys other
than Allaah.” (Dhilaal, vol.3, p.1198)
This is nothing but takfeer of Islamic societies and this is rejected from a number
of angles:
1. They have been tested by this extremism due to a sick understanding of the
texts and a disregard of adhering to the manhaj of the Salaf. This is what
their forefathers, the Khawaarij, fell into, because they made takfeer of a
group of Companions who had been promised Paradise such as ’Ali ibn
Abee Taalib (radi Allaahu ’anhu) and used as a proof the general verse
which is,

“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is
those who are disbelievers.”

$W7DDJKRRW+B?

Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah) said1:

If even during the time of the Messenger of Allaah and the rightly guided
Caliphs there were those who ascribed themselves to Islaam who had great
acts of worship but the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) instructed to
kill them. This is because he knew that ascribing to Islaam and the Sunnah
during those times would emerge from those who try to use the Qur’aan and
Sunnah to the extent that some claim the Sunnah when they are not from its
people and rather pass through it. This is due to: extremism, which Allaah has
censured in His Book saying
Ύ˴Ϥϧ͉·˶͋ϖΤ
˴ ˸ϟ΍͉ϻ·˶˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍ϰ˴Ϡϋ
˴ ˸΍Ϯ˵ϟϮ˵ϘΗ˴ ˴ϻϭ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ Ϩ˶ ϳ˶Ωϲ˶ϓ˸΍Ϯ˵Ϡ˸ϐΗ˴ ˴ϻ˶ΏΎ˴ΘϜ˶ ˸ϟ΍˴Ϟ˸ϫ΃˴Ύ˴ϳͽ
˲Ρϭ˵έϭ˴ ˴Ϣϳ˴ ˸ήϣ˴ ϰ˴ϟ·˶Ύ˴ϫΎ˴Ϙ˸ϟ΃˴˵ϪΘ˵ Ϥ˴ Ϡ˶ϛ˴ ϭ˴ ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˵ϝϮ˵γέ˴ ˴Ϣϳ˴ ˸ήϣ˴ ˵Ϧ˸Α΍ϰ˴δϴ˶ϋ˵΢ϴ˶δϤ˴ ˸ϟ΍
ͼϪ˵ ˸Ϩ͋ϣ
“O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or
say about Allaah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary,
was but a messenger of Allaah and His word which He directed to Mary
and a soul [created at a command] from Him.”
{an-Nisaa (4): 171}
To where Allaah said,
ϼ
˱ ϴ˶ϛϭ˴ ˶ϪϠ˷ϟΎ˶Αϰ˴ϔϛ˴ ϭ˴
“And sufficient is Allaah as Disposer of affairs.”
{an-Nisaa (4): 171}
And Allaah says,
˯΍˴Ϯ˸ϫ΃˴˸΍Ϯ˵όΒ˶ Θ͉ Η˴ ˴ϻϭ˴ ͋ϖΤ ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ Ϩ˶ ϳ˶Ωϲ˶ϓ˸΍Ϯ˵Ϡ˸ϐΗ˴ ˴ϻ˶ΏΎ˴ΘϜ˶ ˸ϟ΍˴Ϟ˸ϫ΃˴Ύ˴ϳͽ

˴ ˸ϟ΍˴ή˸ϴϏ
˯΍˴Ϯγ
˴ Ϧ˴ϋ˸΍Ϯ͊Ϡο
˴ ϭ˴ ΍˱ήϴ˶Μϛ˴ ˸΍Ϯ͊Ϡο
˴ ΃˴ϭ˴ ˵Ϟ˸Βϗ˴ Ϧ˶ϣ˸΍Ϯ͊Ϡο
˴ ˸Ϊϗ˴ ˳ϡ˸Ϯϗ˴
ͼϞ˶ ϴ˶Βδ͉ ϟ΍
“O People of the Scripture, do not exceed limits in your religion
beyond the truth and do not follow the inclinations of a people who

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+0+0E0E1

had gone astray before and misled many and have strayed from the
soundness of the way.”
The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) said:

ϦϳΪϟ΍ϲϓϮϠϐϟ΍ϢϜϠΒϗϥΎϛϦϣϚϠϫ΃ΎϤϧΈϓϦϳΪϟ΍ϲϓϮϠϐϟ΍ϭϢϛΎϳ·
“Beware of extremism in the religion, for those before were destroyed due to
1
extremism in religion.” The hadeeth is Saheeh.
2. Takfeer ‘of the rulers especially and of the Ummah generally, whether they
attest to that or not, knowingly or out of ignorance’. The origin of this
statement is in connecting the conditions of the Muslims in an abode of
Islaam to the conditions of its leaders, this is one of the manifest principles
of the khawaarij.
3. (Aboo Baseer displays) a lack of making excuses due to ignorance and
establishing the proof, in the same way as Sayyid.
4. Yes, it is true that legislation and ruling in a matter for the affairs of the
dunya are only for Allaah and are particular to Allaah. But whoever
contradicts this, whether ruler or ruled, but does not make it lawful or reject
the obligation of ruling by the Divine Legislation of Islaam, and without
mocking it and the likes, is not a disbeliever. There is no disagreement
about this among the people of Sunnah, so the one who commits zinaa is
not made takfeer of except if he makes zinaa halaal. The person who
drinks alcohol is not to be made takfeer of, neither for zinaa, drinking
alcohol, or ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed, but for things
such as prostrating to idols, abusing the deen or mocking the Qur’aan. Ibn
Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah) stated in Minhaaj us-Sunnah, vol.5, p.130:
ϦϤϓˬήϓΎϛϮϬϓϪϟϮγέϰϠϋͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϢϜΤϟ΍ΏϮΟϭΪϘΘόϳϢϟϦϣϥ΃ΐϳέϻϭ
ˬήϓΎϛϮϬϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤϟωΎΒΗ΍ήϴϏϦϣ˱ϻΪϋϮϫϩ΁έΎϤΑαΎϨϟ΍ϦϴΑϢϜΤϳϥ΃ϞΤΘγ΍
ϩ΁έΎϣΎϬϨϳΩϲϓϝΪόϟ΍ϥϮϜϳΪϗϭˬϝΪόϟΎΑϢϜΤϟΎΑήϣ΄Ηϲϫϭϻ·Δϣ΃ϦϣΎϣϪϧΈϓ
˰Ϳ΍ΎϬϟΰϨϳϢϟϲΘϟ΍ϢϬΗ΍ΩΎόΑϥϮϤϜΤϳϡϼγϹ΍ϰϟ·ϦϴΒδΘϨϤϟ΍ϦϣήϴΜϛϞΑˬϢϫήΑΎϛ΃
ϱάϟ΍Ϯϫ΍άϫϥ΃ϥϭήϳϭˬϢϬϴϓϦϴϋΎτϤϟ΍ήϣ΄ϛϭˬΔϳΩΎΒϟ΍ϒϟ΍Ϯδϛ˰ϰϟΎόΗϭϪϧΎΤΒγ

(D
( DV6DKHHKDKKDGHHWK+B0E

΍άϫϊϣϦϜϟϭˬ΍ϮϤϠγ΃αΎϨϟ΍Ϧϣ>ήϴΜϛϭ@ΔϨδϟ΍ϭΏΎΘϜϟ΍ϥϭΩϪΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϲϐΒϨϳ
΍Ϯϓήϋ΍Ϋ·˯ϻΆϬϓˬϥϮϋΎτϤϟ΍ΎϬΑήϣ΄ϳϲΘϟ΍ϢϬϟΔϳέΎΠϟ΍Ε΍ΩΎόϟΎΑϻ·ϥϮϤϜΤϳϻ
ϑϼΨΑ΍ϮϤϜΤϳϥ΃΍ϮϠΤΘγ΍ϞΑϚϟΫ΍ϮϣΰΘϠϳϢϠϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϻ·ϢϜΤϟ΍ίϮΠϳϻϪϧ΃
˰ϫ΍Ϣϫήϣ΃ϡΪϘΗϦϤϛ˱ϻΎϬΟ΍ϮϧΎϛϻ·ϭέΎϔϛϢϬϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃Ύϣ
There is no doubt that the one whose does not believe in the obligation
of ruling by what Allaah has revealed to His Messenger is a disbeliever.
Whoever makes it lawful to rule the people by what he thinks is justice
and not following what Allaah has revealed is a disbeliever. There is no
nation except that it orders ruling with justice and sometimes justice, as
perceived by its senior leaders, can exist in its religion. Many of those
who ascribe themselves to Islaam judge by their customs that Allaah has
not revealed. This is like the traditional customs of the Bedouins and the
chiefs were obeyed in this regard and they used to consider that it was
desirable to rule by such customs without referring to the Book and the
Sunnah, this is kufr. As many people became Muslim but they did not
rule except by their traditional customs which were passed down to
them and which were ordered by those leaders who they obeyed. So if
they know that it is not allowed to rule except by what Allaah has
revealed and did not adhere to that but in fact declared it to be lawful
for themselves to rule in opposition to what Allaah has revealed, then
they are disbelievers. And if not (i.e. did not declare it lawful) then they
are merely ignorant people as has been mentioned prior about them.
I say: They obeyed their leaders and chiefs because they viewed justice according
to what their chiefs said it was and they followed the customs and laws of the
Bedouins just like how the laws today are used by the rulers and are ingrained
within them and their minds if they are not written in their constitutions. For that
reason, Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah did not make takfeer of them unless they
declared it lawful and with the condition that they know it is not permissible to
rule except by what Allaah has revealed. So do you see how Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn
Taymiyyah ruled them as having Islaam if they do not know that it is not
permissible to rule by anything except what Allaah has revealed? Also can you see
how Ibn Taymiyyah ruled them as having Islaam even though they only judged by

traditional customs which had been passed down like man-made laws? So where
are the Khawaarij of the era in comparison to Ibn Taymiyyah and the ’Ulama of
Islaam?
Therefore, the issue of ruling and referring to other laws for judgement
according to Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, and which is the school of thought
of the Companions and the Imaams after them, is that merely referring judgement
to other than the Divine Legislation is not disbelief rather it is disobedience and
kufr less than kufr. The explanation is also found in an answer within the
Fataawaa of the Lajnah ad-Daa’imah (fatwa no.5741)1 in answer to the question:
Whoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed, is he a Muslim or a
disbeliever who has committed major kufr whose actions will not be accepted?
Answer:
All praise is due to Allaah and may prayers and peace be upon His Messenger, his
family and companions, to proceed: Allaah says,

ͼϥ
˴ Ϯ˵Ϥϟ˶Ύ͉ψϟ΍Ϣ˵ ϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵Ϫ˷Ϡϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ
“And whoever does not judge by what All h has revealed then it is those
who are the wrongdoers.”
ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵Ϙγ˶ Ύ˴ϔ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

; ' ( ) P UDKHHPDKXOODDK ' (# &PPF

('(#&5((&Q& + )DWDDZDD

RIWKH3HUPDQHQW&RPPLWWHHIRU5HVHDUFKDQG9HUGLFWV (#R
PPF"': <F=Q +
8' +MJ1+% *

“And whoever does not judge by what All h has revealed then it is those
who are the defiantly disobedient.”
{al-Maa’idah(5): 47}
However, if he makes that lawful and believes that it is allowed then he has
committed major kufr, major dhulm and major fisq which expels him from the
religion. But if he did it due to a bribe or for any other reason yet he believes that it
is prohibited then such a person is sinful and is considered a disbeliever in that he
has committed minor kufr, and has committed minor dhulm and minor fisq. Such a
person has not left the fold of the religion as the people of knowledge have
explained in the tafseer of these verses. With Allaah is success and may peace and
prayers be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family and companions.
Shaykh ’Abdul’Azeez Bin Baaz (raheemahulaah) emphasised this again in his

commentary of Nawaaqid ul-Islaam of Shaykh Muhammad ibn ’AbdulWahhaab
(raheemahullaah) 1 wherein he said:
Included in the fourth category is whoever believes that a system or man-made laws
which people implement are better than the Divine Legislation of Islaam, or that the
Islamic system should not be applied in the 20th Century, or that the Islamic system
is the reason for the Muslims being backward, or he restricts the individuals
connection with his Lord to some affairs of life. Also in the fourth category includes
whoever regards the rule of Allaah in cutting the hand of the thief, stoning the
married adulterer etc., is not suitable for the current era, also included is whoever
believes that it is not allowed to rule by other than the Divine Legislation of Allaah
in social interactions, the punishments or anything else, yet does not believe that it
is better than the rule of the Divine Legislation, yet he permits what Allaah has
prohibited which is well known in the deen by necessity such as zinaa, drinking
alcohol, interest and ruling by other than the Divine Legislation of Allaah – such a
person is a disbeliever according to the consensus of the Muslims.
Imaam Bin Baaz (raheemahullaah) in a clear fatwa differentiating between the
ruler by other than what Allaah has revealed without istihlaal and the one who

% G
1DZDDTLGXO,VODDPD ((#
8'P(#&&P PC (#&&P P( ( +)
' WDNIHHUHHV ( D
( D '
(D #'
G1DZDDTLGXO,VODDP (!.% *

rules by making it permissible, for this reason when Imaam Bin Baaz was asked
about the ruling of the one who studies man-made laws or institutes studying it,
he answered:
SECOND CATEGORY: Whoever studies man-made laws or institutes its study, while
having eemaan in the prohibition to rule by other than what Allaah has revealed,
yet his desires and love of wealth overcome him, those in this category are no
doubt sinful and within them is kufr, dhulm and fisq, however it is minor kufr,
minor dhulm and minor fisq which does not expel the person from the fold of
Islaam. This view is well-known among the people of knowledge and is the saying
of Ibn ’Abbaas, Taawoos, ’Ataa’, Mujaahid and a group of the Salaf and the Khalaf
as mentioned by al-Haafidh Ibn Katheer, al-Baghawee, al-Qurtubee and others. Al-
’Allaamah Ibn ul-Qayyim (raheemahullaah) in Kitaab us-Salaah and Shaykh
’AbdulLateef bin Hasan (raheemahullaah) both mention this also. Shaykh
’AbdulLateef has a good treatise which is published in the third volume of the
compilation ar-Rasaa’il al-Ulaa. There is no doubt that those of this category are
upon great danger and it is feared that they will fall into apostasy.
Then Imaam Bin Baaz stated:
THIRD CATEGORY: Whoever studies man-made laws or says that it is halaal to
study it, whether he believes that the Divine Legislation is better or does not believe
that it is better, is a disbeliever according to the consensus of the Muslims. Such a
person has committed major kufr because he has made it lawful to rule by man-
made laws which contradict the Divine Legislation of Allaah and is therefore making
lawful what is known in the religion by necessity as being unlawful, so such a
person has the ruling of making zinaa, alcohol and the likes lawful.
Then Aboo Baseer transmits long speech from Sayyid Qutb to support what he
says and continues to quote from him in that! Sayyid does not make any excuses
for ignorance at all and uses his own intellect to expel people from the deen of
Islaam, wherein he says in Dhilaal, vol.4, p.1991, after speaking in the context of
the story of Yoosuf (alayhi salaam):
ϻ˱ΎΌϴηϢϠόϳϻϱάϟΎϓˬϢϳϮϘϟ΍Ϳ΍ϦϳΩϰϠϋϢϬϠόΠϳϻϥϮϤϠόϳϻϢϬϧϮϛϭ
ϦϜϤϤϟ΍ϦϣΪόϳϢϟϦϳΪϟ΍ΔϘϴϘΣϥϮϤϠόϳϻαΎϧΪΟϭ΍ΫΈϓ Ύ˱ϘϴϘΤΗϪϴϓΩΎϘΘϋϻ΍ϚϠϤϳ
ϢϬϴϠϋώΒδ˵ϳϢϬϟ˱΍έάϋϢϬϠϬΟϢϘϳϢϟϭ ϦϳΪϟ΍΍άϫϰϠϋϢϬϧ΄ΑϢϬϔλϭ˱Ύόϗ΍ϭϭ˱ϼϘϋ
ˬϪΑϢϠόϟ΍Ϧϣωήϓ˯ϲηΩΎϘΘϋΎϓˬ˯΍ΪΘΑ΍ΔϔμϠϟϊϧΎϣϞϬΠϟ΍ϥ΃ϚϟΫϡϼγϹ΍Δϔλ
ϲϓϡϮϘϳϻΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϥ· ΢ο΍Ϯϟ΍Δϫ΍ΪΒϟ΍ϖτϨϣϦϣˬϊϗ΍Ϯϟ΍ϭϞϘόϟ΍ϖτϨϣ΍άϫϭ
αΎϨϟ΍ΪϴΒόΗϖΣϱ΃ΔϴΑϮΑήϟ΍ϮϫϭΔϴϫϮϟϷ΍κ΋ΎμΧκΧ΃˱Ύϴϋ˷Ϊϣϻ·νέϷ΍

ϪϴϋΪϳϊϗ΍Ϯϟ΍ϢϟΎϋϲϓ΍άϫϝϭ΍ΰϳΫ·ϮϫϭˬϪϧϮϧΎϗϭϩήϜϔϟϢϬΘϧϮϨϳΩϭˬϪϋήηϭϩήϣϷ
ϲϓϻ·ϡϮϘϳϻΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϥ· ϝϮϘϟ΍ϦϣϯϮϗ΃ϞϴϟΩϞϤόϟΎϓ˰ϪϧΎδϠΑϪϠϘϳϢϟϮϟϭ˰
ήϘΘγ΍ΪϗϭϡϮϘϳϥ΃ϦϜϤϳΎϤϓˬαΎϨϟ΍ΏϮϠϗϦϋΔμϟΎΨϟ΍ΓΪϴϘόϟ΍ϭϢϴϘϟ΍ϦϳΪϟ΍ΔΒϴϏ
ˬϩΪΣϭ Ϳ ϻ· ϥϮϜΗ ϻ ΓΩΎΒόϟ΍ ϥϷ ˬϩΪΣϭ Ϳ ϢϜΤϟ΍ ϥ΃ ϼ
˱ όϓ αΎϨϟ΍ ΩΎϘΘϋ΍ ϲϓ
˰ϫ΍ΓΩΎΒόϟ΍ϝϮϟΪϣ ϼλ΃ϲϫϞΑˬΓΪΒϋϢϜΤϠϟωϮπΨϟ΍ϭ
“Their condition (of not knowing) does not establish them on the deen of
Allaah, because the one who does not know anything does not possess or
actualise the creed of the deen. So if a people are found who do not know
the reality of the deen they do not fully know or live it for them to be known
as being on the deen! And their ignorance is not an excuse for them and the
ascription of Islaam is wiped out for them because ignorance prevents
having a complete ascription (to Islaam).1 Believing in something is a branch
of having knowledge of it, this is logical and real speech in clear words. The
taaghoot is not established in the earth except via calling to the most unique
qualities of Uloohiyyah which is Ruboobiyyah meaning: the right of people’s
servitude for its command and legislation and for the people to live in
accordance with its ideas and laws – this is a present reality in the world,
even if it is not uttered by the tongue, action is a much stronger proof than
statements. The taaghoot are not established except by getting rid of the
straight deen and pure ’aqeedah from the hearts of people. It is not possible
to establish taaghoot if the action is established within people to rule by
Allaah alone, as worship is only for Allaah alone and referring judgement is
worship, rather it is the basis for worship and obedience in rulership is an
act of worship.”
This is the kalaam of Sayyid Qutb who is the teacher of these people without
dispute and he erred greatly in this mater and this affected his younger students,
La hawla wa la Quwwata ila billaah! By Allaah, this kind of speech is not said by
one who has even the slightest knowledge of the principles of the Sharee’ah and
its Usool! This idea is void from a number of angles:
Firstly: Where is the excuse of ignorance? Where is the establishment of the
proofs? As the Imaams of the Salaf of this Ummah have confirmed? So I do not
know how Sayyid Qutb negates the description of the deen and Islaam from the

)
' ( ' (( Q '
' NXIU! # '
:DKGDWXO:XMRRG Q& #

NXIU+
'

' ( ' (
)+

people with his own intellect when he is talking about the Divine Legislation of
Allaah?! Even though yes good actions are verified by the intellect, reward and
punishment however is only after applying the Divine Legislation, as responsibility
is not confirmed except with the Divine legislation and the intellect does not enter
the equation at all. Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (raheemahulaah) said:
ϲϓϝ΍Ϯϗ΃ΔΛϼΛϪϴϓˮϪϐϠΒϳϥ΃ϞΒϗϒϠϜϤϟ΍ϖΣϲϓΖΒΜϳϞϫΏΎτΨϟ΍ϢϜΣϥ΃΍άϫϞλ΃ϭ
Ϫϧ΃ήϬχϷ΍ϭˬΦγΎϨϟ΍ϥϭΩ΃ΪΘΒϤϟ΍ΖΒΜϳϞϴϗϭˬΖΒΜϳϻϞϴϗϭΖΒΜϳϞϴϗϩήϴϏϭΪϤΣ΃ΐϫάϣ
ϰϟΎόΗϪϟϮϘϟˬύϼΒϟ΍ΪόΑϻ·ΏΎτΨϟ΍ΖΒΜϳϻϭˬϚϟΫϦϣ˯ϲη˯ΎπϗΐΠϳϻ
The basis of this is: is the ruling about receiving the message affirmed for the one
who is responsible before it has reached him? There are three opinions in this
regard in the madhdhab of Imaam Ahmad and others, some say it is affirmed, some
say it is not while the others say it is affirmed at first but not totally. And it is
apparent that the message cannot be confirmed until it has been conveyed to
someone. For Allaah says,
ͼώ˴ Ϡ˴Α˴ Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ˶ϪΑ˶ Ϣ˵ϛέ˴ ά˶ ϧ˵Ϸͽ

“...that I may warn you thereby and whomever it reaches.”
{al-An’aam (6): 19}
ϦϣϭˬϝϮγήϟ΍ϪΑ˯ΎΟΎϣϪϐϠΒϳϰΘΣΪΣ΃ΐϗΎόϳϻϪϧ΃ϪϧΎΤΒγϦϴ˷ΑΩΪόΘϣϥ΁ήϘϟ΍ϲϓ΍άϫϞΜϣϭ
ˬϪϐϠΒϳϢϟΎϣϰϠϋͿ΍ϪΑάόϳϢϟˬϪΑ˯ΎΟΎϤϣ˱΍ήϴΜϛϢϠόϳϢϟϭϚϟάΑϦϣ΂ϓͿ΍ϝϮγέ˱΍ΪϤΤϣϥ΃ϢϠϋ
ΪόΑϻ·Ϫτ΋΍ήηξόΑϰϠϋϪΑάόϳϻϪϧΈϓˬύϮϠΒϟ΍ΪόΑϻ·ϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϙήΗϰϠϋϪΑάόϳϢϟ΍Ϋ·ϪϧΈϓ
Ϳ΍ϝϮγέΔϨγϩάϫϭˬϯήΣ΃ϭϰϟϭ΃ύϮϠΒϟ΍εϚϟΫϝΎΜϣ΃ϲϓϪϨϋΔπϴϔΘδϤϟ΍
The likes of these verses clarify that Allaah does not punish anyone until
after the message of what the Messenger came with has been conveyed to
them. So whoever knows that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah and believes
in that yet does not know much about it is not punished by Allaah because the rest
of it has not reached him yet. Therefore, he is not punished for abandoning eemaan
until after the message has reached him and he cannot be punished for some
conditions until it has reached him first and this is the Sunnah of the Messenger of

Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) and in the likes of such matter this is
extensive from him (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam).1
Then Shaykh ul-Islaam transmits certain incidents from the Companions (radi
Allaahu ’anhum) wherein they were not fully aware of some issues from the
Divine legislation, he says:
ϪϐϠΒΗϢϟϦϤϓˬΔϟΎγήϟ΍ύϼΑ·ΪόΑϻ·˱΍ΪΣ΃ΏάόϳϻͿ΍ϥ΃ϰϠϋϝΩΪϗΔϨδϟ΍ϭΏΎΘϜϟ΍ϥΈϓ˴Ύπϳ΃ϭ
ϪϴϠϋΖϣΎϗΎϣέΎϜϧ·ϰϠϋϻ·ϪΑάόϳϢϟϞϴμϔΗξόΑϥϭΩΔϠϤΟϪΘϐϠΑϦϣϭˬ˱Ύγ΃έϪΑάόϳϢϟΔϠϤΟ
ΔϴϟΎγήϟ΍ΔΠΤϟ΍
Also, the Book and Sunnah indicate that Allaah does not punish anyone
except after the message has been conveyed, so whoever has not had it
conveyed to him will not be punished and whoever has had it conveyed but
without full explanation of some issues will not be punished except when
the proof has been established.
Then Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah sad:
Ϫϧ΃Ύϣ·ˬ˱ϼϴμϔΗϪΑϦϣΆϳϢϠϓˬϝϮγήϟ΍ϪΑ˯ΎΟΎϣξόΑϢϠόϳϢϟϭˬϪϟϮγέϭͿΎΑϦϣ΁ΪϗϥΎϛϦϤϓ
Ϟϳϭ΄Θϟ΍ϦϣωϮϨϟήΧ΁ϰϨόϣΪϘΘϋ΍ϭ΃ˬΎϬΑϖϳΪμΘϟ΍ΐΠϳϻϖϳήσϦϣϪόϤγϭ΃ˬϪόϤδϳϢϟ
ϢϟΎϣϭˬϪϴϠϋͿ΍ϪΒϴΜϳϥ΃ΐΟϮϳΎϣϪϟϮγήΑϭͿΎΑϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϦϣϪϴϓϞόΟΪϗ΍άϬϓˬϪΑέάόϳϱάϟ΍
ΎϬϔϟΎΨϣήϔϜϳϲΘϟ΍ΔΠΤϟ΍ϪΑϪϴϠϋϢϘΗϢϠϓϪΑϦϣΆϳ
Whoever has believed in Allaah and His Messenger but does not known
about some of the things that the Messenger came with and thus they do not
believe in it but this requires some explanation: either he did not hear about
it; or he heard it by via an untrustworthy route which cannot be trusted; or
he believes in another meaning due to some sort of interpretation which he
can be excused for – this person has made eemaan in Allaah and His
messenger with what Allaah will not reward him for due to what he does not
believe in, so the proof has not been established in order to make takfeer of
him due to his opposition.2
Secondly: Sayyid Qutb’s confusion, which is usual, between Tawheed Ruboobiyyah
and Tawheed Uloohiyyah and his ignorance of the difference between the two,
wherein he says

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+BB+11B
B)+D+B+1@0

Ϯϫϭ ΔϴϫϮϟϷ΍ κ΋ΎμΧ κΧ΃ Ύ˱ϴϋΪϣ ϻ· νέϷ΍ ϲϓ ϡϮϘϳ ϻ ΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ ϥ·
ϪϧϮϧΎϗϭϩήϜϔϟϢϬΘϧϮϨϳΩϭˬϪϋήηϭϩήϣϷαΎϨϟ΍ΪϴΒόΗϖΣϱ΃ˬΔϴΑϮΑήϟ΍
“The taaghoot is not established in the earth except via calling to the most
unique qualities of Uloohiyyah which is Ruboobiyyah meaning: the right of
people’s servitude for its command and legislation and for the people to live
in accordance with its ideas and laws...”
This statement from Sayyid is false and would not emerge from a scholar that has
knowledge of tawheed or even from a small student of knowledge who knows the
reality of tawheed. If this shows anything, it merely shows that Sayyid was
ignorant of the basis of tawheed. Rubboiyyah is: the actions of the Rabb (Lord) in
creating, providing, arranging the affairs in life and death and everything that
concerns the universe.
Uloohiyyah is: The actions of the people such as prayer, fear, hope, being
connected to worshipping Allaah, seeking nearness to Allaah, du’a to Allaah,
humility to Allaah, longing for and hoping in Allaah etc.
Sayyid has no precedent for his definition at all, for al-Haakimiyyah is only in the
meaning in being from Ruboobiyyah and ruling and referring to laws are from the
rights of Ruboobiyyah, as the Imaams have attested to. Shaykh ’Uthaymeen was
asked about ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed and answered:
Ruling by what Allaah has revealed is under Tawheed Ruboobiyyah because it is
carrying out the rule of Allaah based on His Lordship and perfecting His Dominion.
Allaah calls those who follow other than what Allaah has revealed as ‘lords’ that are
followed. Allaah says,
˴ Η͉΍ͽ
Ύ˴ϣϭ˴ ˴Ϣϳ˴ ˸ήϣ˴ ˴Ϧ˸Α΍˴΢ϴ˶δϤ˴ ˸ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˶ϥϭ˵ΩϦ͋ϣΎ˱ΑΎ˴Α˸έ΃˴˸ϢϬ˵ ϧ˴ Ύ˴Β˸ϫέ˵ ϭ˴ ˸Ϣϫ˵ έ˴ Ύ˴Β˸Σ΃˴˸΍ϭ˵άΨ
ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵ϛή˶ ˸θϳ˵Ύ͉Ϥϋ˴ ˵Ϫϧ˴ Ύ˴Τ˸Βγ˵ ˴Ϯϫ˵ ͉ϻ·˶˴Ϫ˰˴ϟ·˶͉ϻ΍˱ΪΣ˶ ΍˴ϭΎ˱Ϭ˰˴ϟ·˶˸΍ϭ˵ΪΒ˵˸όϴ˴ϟ˶͉ϻ·˶˸΍ϭ˵ήϣ˶ ΃˵
“They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides All h, and [also]
the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to
worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever
they associate with Him.”
{at-Tawbah (9): 31}1

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDZD5DVDD¶LO,EQ¶8WKD\PHHQD+B+1A11

However, the excess of Sayyid in focusing on al-Haakimiyyah and his ignorance

of La ilaha il-Allaah and its correct explanation and explaining it as ‘there is no
ruler except Allaah’ and then from here his negligence of ’Uboodiyyah wherein he
makes al-Haakimiyyah, Ruboobiyyah and ruling as the most unique qualities of
Uloohiyyah (in Dhilaal, vol.5, p.2717), is what led him to fall into these misguided
matters.
Due to this, as is the condition of his followers today such Aboo Baseer, they
do not give any importance to mentioning major shirk which is: directing worship
to other than Allaah via dua’a, slaughtering, making vows, seeking assistance and
help, seeking help and increase, indeed he stated explicitly in Dhilaal ul-
Qur’aan:1
ϥΎϛϻϭˬ>ϡΎϨλϷ΍ΓΩΎΒϋ@ΔϬΠϟ΍ϩάϫϦϣϲϘϴϘΤϟ΍>ζϳήϗέΎϔϛ@ϢϬϛήηϥΎϛΎϣ
ϡΎϨλϷ΍ϩάϬΑωΎϔθΘγϻ΍ϦϋϲϠΨΘϟ΍ΩήΠϣϲϓ˱ϼΜϤΘϣϢϬϨϣϢϠγ΃Ϧϣϡϼγ·
“Their (kuffaar of Quraysh) shirk was not real from this angle (the worship
of idols). The Islaam of those who become Muslim from them was not
merely due to them abandoning seeking intercession by these idols.”
In contrast, Sayyid Qutb makes following humans in manners, traditions, customs
and uniforms to be shirk in its most unique reality and as opposing the
Shahaadah that ‘there is nothing worthy of worship except Allaah and
Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah’ in its most unique form and even if the
servant turns to Allaah worshipping Him alone with Uloohiyyah and living
according to the Divine Legislation of Allaah in wudoo’, Salaah, fasting and the
rest of the main symbols of Islaam. In Fee Dhilaal il-Qur’aan, vol.4, p.2114,
(published by Daar ush-Shurooq). This destroyed man (i.e. Aboo Baseer)
transmitted this speech of Sayyid Qutb in his book which we are discussing now,
at-Taaghoot (pp.156-61), supporting the general takfeer that is found in the rest of
the book:
ΔϳΩϮΒόϟ΍ϥ·ˬ˯ϲηϞϛϲϫΖδϴϟΎϬϨϜϟϭΔΧέΎμϟ΍ΓέϮμϟ΍ϲϫϩάϬϓˬϦϴϋήθϤϟ΍ϭ˯Ύγ΅ήϟ΍ϭ
ˬΓέϮμϟ΍ϩάϫϦϣϰδϗ΃ϭϖϤϋ΃ϭϯϮϗ΃ϥϮϜΗΪϗΎϬϨϜϟϭˬΔϴϔΧϯήΧ΃έϮλϲϓϞΜϤΘΗΩΎΒόϠϟ
ϰϠϋ˯ϻΆϬϟϥΎτϠγϱ΃ˬϼ
˱ Μϣ˯ΎϳίϷ΍ϭΕΎοϮϤϟ΍ϲόϧΎμϟΔϳΩϮΒόϟ΍ϚϠΗ΍άϬϟ˱ϻΎΜϣΏήπϧϭ
ήθΒϟ΍Ϧϣ˱΍ΪΟήϴΒϛϊϴτϗ«ΔϬϟ΁ϦϣνϭήϔϤϟ΍ϱΰϟ΍ϥ·ϦϳήπΤΘϣϢϬϧϮϤδϳϦϳάϟ΍Ϟϛ

:+0+1@B

ΔϳΩϮΒϋϞΜϤϴϟΕϼϔΤϟ΍ϭ΃ήχΎϨϤϟ΍ϭ΃ϲϧΎΒϤϟ΍ϭ΃ΕΎΑήόϟ΍ϭ΃βΑϼϤϟ΍ϲϓ˯΍Ϯγ˯ΎϳίϷ΍
ϥ΍ΩϮϟϭˬΎϬϨϋΝϭήΨϟ΍ϲϓήϜϔϳϭ΃ˬΎϬϨϣΖϠϔϳϥ΃ΔϴϠϫΎΠϟϻϭϲϠϫΎΠϟϞϴΒγϻΔϣέΎλ
ϦϴϠΘΒΘϣ˱΍ΩΎΒϋ΍ϮϧΎϜϟ˯ΎϳίϷ΍ϲόϧΎμϟϥϮϨϳΪϳΎϣξόΑͿΔϳέΎπΤϟ΍ΔϴϠϫΎΠϟ΍ϩάϫϲϓαΎϨϟ΍
ϲϫϦϜΗϢϟϥ·ΔϴΑϮΑήϟ΍ϭΔϴϤϛΎΤϟ΍ϥϮϜΗ΍ΫΎϣϭˮϩάϫϲϫϦϜΗϢϟϥ·ΔϳΩϮΒόϟ΍ϥϮϜΗ΍ΫΎϤϓ
ˮΎπϳ΃˯ΎϳίϷ΍ϲόϧΎλΔϴΑϮΑέϭΔϴϤϛΎΣ
1
“The worship of people is represented in another (hidden) way but it can be
stronger, deeper and harder, it is the worship of customs, codes of practice
and traditions, we’ll put forth an example: the worship of the manufacturers
of style and dress. For example, which authority in this field has a very large
flock of followers from the people? Everyone who is considered as being
‘civilised.’ The obligatory clothing from the gods of fashion is in clothing or
in designs, models, cars, buildings, scenes and parties…it all represents
rigorous worship, there is no path for ignorance to escape from it or to even
think about finding an exit out of it. If the people of this civilised jaahiliyyah
owed to Allaah what they owe to the manufacturers of these styles of
clothing, they would be sincere pious worshipers! So what is worship if this
isn’t? So what is al-Haakimiyyah and ar-Ruboobiyyah if this isn’t
Haakimiyyah and Ruboobiyyah to the fashion designers too?!”
Then he said:
ϲϓϭϪϧΎΤΒγͿ΍ΕϻΎγέϲϓΔϳΎϨόϟ΍ϚϠΗϞϛΔϳΩϮΒόϟ΍ϭΔϴϫϮϟϷ΍ΔϴπϗϝΎϨΗϪϠϛϚϟΫϞΟ΃Ϧϣ
ϖϠόΘΗΎϬϨϜϟϭˬΓΪϴόΒϟ΍ΔΟΫΎδϟ΍ΕΎϴϠϫΎΠϟ΍ϲϓϥΎΛϭϷ΍ϭϡΎϨλϷ΍ΓΪΒόΑϖϠόΘΗϻΔϴπϗϲϬϓϪΒΘϛ
ˬΦϳέ΄Θϟ΍ϞΒϗΎϣΕΎϴϠϫΎΟˬΎϬϠϛΕΎϴϠϫΎΠϟΎΑϖϠόΘΗϭϥΎϜϣϞϛϲϓϭϥΎϣίϞϛϲϓϪϠϛϥΎδϧϹΎΑ
ΩΎΒόϟ΍ΓΩΎΒϋϦϣαΎγ΃ϰϠϋϡϮϘΗΔϴϠϫΎΟϞϛϭˬϦϳήθόϟ΍ϥήϘϟ΍ΕΎϴϠϫΎΟϭˬΦϳέ΄Θϟ΍ΕΎϴϠϫΎΟϭ
˰ϫ΍ΩΎΒόϠϟ
“Due to all of this the issue of Uloohiyyah and ’Uboodiyyah was given utmost
importance in the messages of Allaah in His Books...it is an issue which is
not connected to the worship of idols during the naive and past period of
ignorance, rather it is connected to all people in all times and places and is
connected to all periods ignorance: the days of ignorance, pre-history, the
days of ignorance within history and the days of ignorance within the 20th

' G
'( ³FOHDUDQGDSSDUHQWVKLUN´!!

Century. All times of ignorance are established on the worship of slaves by
slaves.”
So my beloved brothers, compare the speech of Sayyid Qutb with the manhaj of
the Salaf and its people, contemplate his statement precisely and reflect, and then
judge with justice. Then contemplate the statements of Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn
Taymiyyah which have been mentioned. I say: Aboo Baseer bases his book (at-
Taaghoot) on takfeer of the rulers and ruled in his understanding of the meaning
of taaghoot and opposes the manhaj of the Prophets in deen and da’wah to
Allaah. As millions of Muslims fall into shirk at graves and practice worship of
other than Allaah via slaughtering, making vows, seeking help and assistance and
the likes from other than Allaah, rather count the amount of opposition in
beautifying with stronger and deeper manifestations of worshiping other than
Allaah. Travel far to the world of China, Japan and India wherein the worship
cows, idols and tombs is to be found. So where is the speech about the children
of the Muslims within Muslim lands? Because many of them are drowning in the
shirk of graves and seek their needs from al-Badawee, Husayn, Zaynab, Ibn
’Arabee and al-Jeelaanee. Many hundreds are found at graves in Muslim lands,
indeed cities of graves are to be found where worship is established and money is
given to fund vows, so where is the speech about these tawaagheet? Al-Haafidh
Aboo Muhammad ’AbdurRahmaan bin Ismaa’eel ash-Shaafi’ee, well known as ‘Ibn
Shaamah’, in his book al-Bida’ wa’l-Hawaadith states:
Also in this category is the calamity which has been spread by Shaytaan by
beautifying it to the common people, such as: building walls with pillars (i.e.
tombs), which is found in every country, and placing lights in them making them
special places. In some cases it is relayed that a person allegedly had a dream
wherein they saw a person known for righteousness and piety and as a result of this
created such tombs in order to preserve the memory of the person and thinking that
they are getting closer to Allaah in doing this, even if they abandon the obligations
of Allaah in building such tombs. Then they may even go further than this and
begin to glorify in their hearts the sites where such tombs are found or seek cures
for their diseases and ask for their needs by making vows. In the city of Damascus
there are a number of places such as ’Uwaynah al-Hamaa outside the ancient city-

1
gate of Baab Toomaa and their is a tomb inside the ancient city-gate of Baab as-
Sagheer and there is an accursed tree outside the ancient city-gate of Baab an-Nasr
on the highway.2 May Allaah make it easy for this tree to be chopped down from its
roots, how similar this is do Dhaat Anwaat which is mentioned in the hadeeth.3
Then what about Nooh (‘alayhi salaam), who called his people for 950 years due
to what his people were doing by worshipping five pious men (Wadd, Suwaa’,
Yaghooth, Ya’ooq and Nasr)? We did not find that he spoke about Shirk al-
Haakimiyyah throughout all of that time! And look at Ibraaheem (‘alayhi salaam),
who called his people to leave off the worship of idols,
ͼΎ˱Ό˸ϴη
˴ ˴ϚϨ˴ϋϲ˶Ϩ˸ϐϳ˵ Ύ˴ϟϭ˴ ˵ήμ
˶ ˸Βϳ˵ Ύ˴ϟϭ˴ ˵ϊϤ˴ ˸δϳ˴ Ύ˴ϟΎ˴ϣ˵ΪΒ˵ ˸όΗ˴ ˴Ϣϟ˶˶ΖΑ˴ ΃˴Ύ˴ϳ˶Ϫϴ˶Α΄˴ϟ˶˴ϝΎ˴ϗ˸Ϋ·˶ͽ
“When he said to his father:O my father! Why do you worship that which
hears not, sees not and cannot avail you in anything?”
{Maryam (19): 42}
...And we do not find that he spoke about al-Haakimiyyah. If we follow the

seerah of the Prophets we find that warning against shirk and directing du’a to
other than Allaah was the main focus of disagreement with their peoples. See the
story of Hood, the story of Moosaa and finally of Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi
wassallam). He came to humanity which at that time was being controlled by two

% D ( <'=
" +% *
B

(
< ='
7 ' > 'Q
(+% *
0 9# ' 6( D ' '
D

( S( UDGL $OODDKX ¶DQKXPD DUED¶HHQ <
(=
' ¶DTHHGDK

' D ZDOHH #

(
!!.
D D D G
(
ZDOHH #

?0
!! 9# ' (

VKLUN

6( ' DD D (

VKLUN C

CP D
# &&P P &
UDKHHPDKXOODDK ( ' + (#& (#
8F < += )DWK DO0DMHHG 6KDUK .LWDDE XW7DZKHHG #

# +0E+
7UDQVODWRU¶V1RWH% '

&)FD H& I' DD VKLUN
D
' D #('
D
(!!. ,
,--'''+F + - G+--E0-N8
N8 #NN

great superpowers, the Persians and the Romans. They used to rule the world with
the laws of Persia and Rome and the Quraysh used to arbitrate by the false deities,
yet the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) did not focus on this at all in the
beginning. Rather, he began calling his people and focused on major shirk such as
the worship of al-Laat, al-’Uzzaa, the angels and other righteous people. Then look
at the Qur’aan, it speaks about the Christians and you find that most discussion of
them revolves around their creed in ’Eesaa (alayhis-salaam) and that he was a
Messenger. Their motto used to be “Give to God what is God’s and give to Caesar
what is Caesar’s”, meaning: a separation between religion and state and they were
living under the Roman Empire who had laws which are still the source for
legislating in the contemporary world. If all this indicates anything it indicates the
opposition of this man, like his teacher Sayyid Qutb, to the da’wah of the
Prophets which focused on ending the worship of idols. So why do you not strive
1
in what the Prophets strived in with their da’wah to Allaah? Your condition says
for you that “Our manhaj is better than the manhaj of the Prophets in
calling to Allaah”, to Allaah we came and to Him we shall return. Then this
ignorant man tries to use proofs from verses of the Qur’aan which justify his
takfeer of the rulers and ruled, Allaah’s saying:
˴Ϣϳ˴ ˸ήϣ˴ ˴Ϧ˸Α΍˴΢ϴ˶δϤ˴ ˸ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˶ϥϭ˵ΩϦ͋ϣΎ˱ΑΎ˴Α˸έ΃˴˸ϢϬ˵ ϧ˴ Ύ˴Β˸ϫέ˵ ϭ˴ ˸Ϣϫ˵ έ˴ Ύ˴Β˸Σ΃˴˸΍ϭ˵άΨ

˴ Η͉΍ͽ
Ύ͉Ϥϋ
˴ ˵Ϫϧ˴ Ύ˴Τ˸Βγ
˵ ˴Ϯϫ˵ ͉ϻ·˶˴Ϫ˰˴ϟ·˶͉ϻ΍˱ΪΣ
˶ ΍˴ϭΎ˱Ϭ˰˴ϟ·˶˸΍ϭ˵ΪΒ˵ ˸όϴ˴ ϟ˶͉ϻ·˶˸΍ϭ˵ήϣ˶ ΃˵Ύ˴ϣϭ˴
ͼϥ
˴ Ϯ˵ϛή˶ ˸θϳ˵
“They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allaah, and
[also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to

B

'
µ,VODPEDVHFRXN¶µ7KH3DWKWR3DUDGLVH¶'
M1 ,³WKLV
WHVWLILHVWRWKHWUDQVJUHVVLRQRIWKHSDODFHDQGVKRZVWKDWLWDQGZKRPVRHYHULVUHVLGLQJLQLW
LVZRUVKLSSHGRWKHUWKDQ$OODDK+RZPDQ\SHRSOHIHDUWKHSDODFHVPRUHWKDQ$OODDKWKLV
VKLUNLVSUHVHQWDQGZHVHHLWVRZHKDYHWRZDUQIURPLW´ ( D
7
¶DOD\KLPXVVDODDP+% *

{at-Tawbah (9): 31}
ϲ˶ϓ˸΍ϭ˵ΪΠ
˶ ϳ˴ ˴ϻ͉ϢΛ˵ ˸ϢϬ˵ Ϩ˴ ˸ϴΑ˴ ˴ήΠ
˴η˴ Ύ˴Ϥϴ˶ϓ˴ϙϮ˵ϤϜ͋ Τ
˴ ϳ˵ ˴ϰΘ͉Σ
˴ ˴ϥϮ˵Ϩϣ˶ ˸Άϳ˵ ˴ϻ˴ϚΑ͋ έ˴ ϭ˴ ˴ϼϓ˴ ͽ
ͼΎ˱Ϥϴ˶Ϡ˸δΗ˴ ˸΍Ϯ˵ϤϠ͋δ
˴ ϳ˵ ϭ˴ ˴Ζ˸ϴπ
˴ ϗ˴ Ύ͉Ϥϣ͋ Ύ˱Οή˴ Σ
˴ ˸ϢϬ˶ δ
˶ ϔ˵ ϧ˴΃
“But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O
Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among
themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you
have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission.”
{an-Nisaa (4): 65}

Then Aboo Baseer transmits speech from Ibn ul-Qayyim which he thinks agrees
with his desires and then Aboo Baseer says:
ϚϟΫϥΈϓˬϞΟϭΰϋͿ΍ωήηϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϟΎΑϻ·ϪΒΣΎμϟΖΒΜϳϻϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϥΎϛ΍Ϋ·
ρήηϪϧϷˬϪϧΎΤΒγϪϟ ΓΩΎΒϋϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ωήηϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϟ΍ϥ΃ΎϤϬϟϭ΃Ϧϳήϣ΃ϰϠϋϝΪϳ
Ύϣ΃ˬϞΟϭΰϋͿΓΩΎΒϋωϮϧϦϤπΘϳϥΎϛ΍Ϋ·ϻ·ϥΎϤϳϺϟ˱Ύσήη˯ϲηϥϮϜϳϻϭˬϥΎϤϳϺϟ
ϦϤπΘϳϱάϟ΍ϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϲϔϨϳϞΟϭΰϋͿ΍ωήηϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϟ΍ϡΪϋϥ΃ϮϬϓˬϲϧΎΜϟ΍ήϣϷ΍
ϪΟϭϷ΍ϦϣϪΟϭϲϓϮϟϭˬϕϮϠΨϤϟ΍ΓΩΎΒϋ
ϊϴϤΟϲϓ˰ϢϛΎΤΘϳϦϤϓˬϪϴϟ·Ϣ˴ϛΎΤΘϤϟ΍ϰϟ·Ϣ˶ϛΎΤΘϤϟ΍ϦϣΓΩΎΒϋϢϛΎΤΘϟ΍ϥ΃ϝΪϓ
ϩήϴϏϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϳϦϣϭˬϰϟΎόΗͿΪΒϋϮϬϓϩΪΣϭͿ΍ϰϟ·˰ΔϣΎόϟ΍ϭΔλΎΨϟ΍ϪΗΎϴΣϥ΅Ϯη
ήϴϐϟ΍΍άϬϟϮϬϓ˰ϪΗΎϴΣΕΎϴ΋ΰΟϦϣΔϴ΋ΰΟϲϓϮϟϭήϴϐϟ΍΍άϫϥΎϛΎϳ΃˰
“If eemaan is not affirmed except when one refers judgement to the Divine
Legislation of Allaah this indicates two things:
Firstly: that referring judgment to the Divine Legislation of Allaah is worship of
Allaah and is a condition for eemaan and nothing is a condition for eemaan except
if it is contains a type of act of worship of Allaah.
Secondly: the avoidance of referring judgement to the Divine Legislation of Allaah
negates eemaan which contains worship of the creation in some form. This
indicates that “to refer judgement” is an act of worship from the one who
goes to a court to rule (by other than Allaah). When judgement is referred to

Allaah in all affairs of life generally and specifically, then such a person is
considered a worshipper of Allaah. But whoever refers judgment to other
than Allaah, whatever from this may take and even in a small aspect of life,
then such a person is of this other thing.”
I say: This speech is what Sayyid Qutb used to always drone on about in order to
negate eemaan from the people who have eemaan and make hasty takfeer of the
Muslims. I will establish what Sayyid said:
ϞλϷ΍ϲϓϥΎϛϥ·ϭˬϙήθϣϮϫΎϤϧΈϓˬΓήϴϐλΔϴ΋ΰΟϲϓϭˬϩΪϨϋϦϣ˱΍ήθΑωΎσ΃Ϧϣϥ·
ΪϬη΃ϝϮϘϳϚϟΫΪόΑϲϘΑΎϤϬϣΎ˱πϳ΃ϙήθϟ΍ϰϟ·ϡϼγϹ΍ϦϣΎϬΑΝήΧΎϤϧΈϓˬΎϬϠόϓϢΛ˱ΎϤϠδϣ
Ϳ΍ήϴϏϊϴτϳϭˬͿ΍ήϴϏϦϣϰϘϠΘϳϮϫΎϤϨϴΑϪϧΎδϠΑͿ΍ϻ·Ϫϟ·ϻϥ΃
“Whoever obeys a man, even in a small aspect is a Mushrik even if he is a
Muslim by origin and then does it, such a person has left the fold of Islaam
to shirk also. This is despite what remains of the person saying ‘La ilaha il-
Allaah’ with his tongue, because he has accepted and obeyed other than
Allaah.”1
I say: Therefore, does this mean that Aboo Baseer - because he obeys a person in
his travel system, visa process and residency procedure as is done in the lands of
disbelief and Islaam and he exchanges money and uses different forms of
communication – is a Mushrik?? However, the manhaj of the Salaf in obedience
out of servitude requires explanation and it is well known according to the people
of knowledge that whoever obeys a Mushrik and believes in what he says himself
becomes a Mushrik. As for obedience via actions, and not belief, then this is
disobedience and not shirk. Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah)
stated in Minhaaj us-Sunnah, vol.5, p.130:
ϦϤϓˬήϓΎϛϮϬϓϪϟϮγέϰϠϋͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϢϜΤϟ΍ΏϮΟϭΪϘΘόϳϢϟϦϣϥ΃ΐϳέϻϭ
ˬήϓΎϛϮϬϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤϟωΎΒΗ΍ήϴϏϦϣ˱ϻΪϋϮϫϩ΁έΎϤΑαΎϨϟ΍ϦϴΑϢϜΤϳϥ΃ϞΤΘγ΍
ϩ΁έΎϣΎϬϨϳΩϲϓϝΪόϟ΍ϥϮϜϳΪϗϭˬϝΪόϟΎΑϢϜΤϟΎΑήϣ΄Ηϲϫϭϻ·Δϣ΃ϦϣΎϣϪϧΈϓ
˰Ϳ΍ΎϬϟΰϨϳϢϟϲΘϟ΍ϢϬΗ΍ΩΎόΑϥϮϤϜΤϳϡϼγϹ΍ϰϟ·ϦϴΒδΘϨϤϟ΍ϦϣήϴΜϛϞΑˬϢϫήΑΎϛ΃
ϱάϟ΍Ϯϫ΍άϫϥ΃ϥϭήϳϭˬϢϬϴϓϦϴϋΎτϤϟ΍ήϣ΄ϛϭˬΔϳΩΎΒϟ΍ϒϟ΍Ϯδϛ˰ϰϟΎόΗϭϪϧΎΤΒγ
΍άϫϊϣϦϜϟϭˬ΍ϮϤϠγ΃αΎϨϟ΍Ϧϣ>ήϴΜϛϭ@ΔϨδϟ΍ϭΏΎΘϜϟ΍ϥϭΩϪΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϲϐΒϨϳ

)HH'KLODDOLO4XU¶DDQD+0+@E

΍Ϯϓήϋ΍Ϋ·˯ϻΆϬϓˬϥϮϋΎτϤϟ΍ΎϬΑήϣ΄ϳϲΘϟ΍ϢϬϟΔϳέΎΠϟ΍Ε΍ΩΎόϟΎΑϻ·ϥϮϤϜΤϳϻ
ϑϼΨΑ΍ϮϤϜΤϳϥ΃΍ϮϠΤΘγ΍ϞΑϚϟΫ΍ϮϣΰΘϠϳϢϠϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϻ·ϢϜΤϟ΍ίϮΠϳϻϪϧ΃
˰ϫ΍Ϣϫήϣ΃ϡΪϘΗϦϤϛ˱ϻΎϬΟ΍ϮϧΎϛϻ·ϭέΎϔϛϢϬϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃Ύϣ
There is no doubt that the one whose does not believe in the obligation
of ruling by what Allaah has revealed to His Messenger is a disbeliever.
Whoever makes it lawful to rule the people by what he thinks is justice
and not following what Allaah has revealed is a disbeliever. There is no
nation except that it orders ruling with justice and sometimes justice, as
perceived by its senior leaders, can exist in its religion. Many of those
who ascribe themselves to Islaam judge by their customs that Allaah has
not revealed. This is like the traditional customs of the Bedouins and the
chiefs were obeyed in this regard and they used to consider that it was
desirable to rule by such customs without referring to the Book and the
Sunnah, this is kufr. As many people became Muslim but they did not
rule except by their traditional customs which were passed down to
them and which were ordered by those leaders who they obeyed. So if
they know that it is not allowed to rule except by what Allaah has
revealed and did not adhere to that but in fact declared it to be lawful
for themselves to rule in opposition to what Allaah has revealed, then
they are disbelievers. And if not (i.e. did not declare it lawful) then they
are merely ignorant people as has been mentioned prior about them.
This destroyed one (i.e. Aboo Baseer) transmits the words of Ibn Taymiyyah on
page 88 of his book at-Taaghoot, but he cuts it, as it their way and omits some of
his words, as is their practice. These are words which if affirmed and mentioned
would destroy what Aboo Baseer tries to argue for. As for the saying of Allaah,

˴ Η͉΍ͽ
Ύ͉Ϥϋ
˵ ˴Ϯϫ˵ ͉ϻ·˶˴Ϫ˰˴ϟ·˶͉ϻ΍˱ΪΣ
ͼϥ
“They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides All h, and [also]
the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to

{at-Tawbah (9): 31}
This is from the doubts which are used by the takfeerees, the Khawaarij of the era,
yet there is no proof for them with it like their use of other verses which were
revealed about the kuffaar and then they apply them to the believers and the
reason for this is due to their direct handling of the texts without investigation into
the fiqh of the Imaams of the Salaf in regards to such verses. This demonstrates
their turning way from the Sunnah and the statements of the Companions,, the
takfeeree ‘tafseer’ of these verses opposes the tafseer of the Prophet (sallallaahu
alayhi wassallam), for it is reported by Tirmidhee (hadeeth no.3095) and others in
the hadeeth of ’Adiyy that he said: I went to the messenger of Allaah and around
my neck was a golden cross and he (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) said “O ’Adiyy,
remove that idol from your neck!” then he recited the verses,

˴ Η͉΍ͽ
Ύ͉Ϥϋ
˵ ˴Ϯϫ˵ ͉ϻ·˶˴Ϫ˰˴ϟ·˶͉ϻ΍˱ΪΣ
ͼϥ
“They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides All h...”
{at-Tawbah (9): 31}
And said:
΍ϮϣήΣ΍Ϋ·ϭˬϩϮϠΤΘγ΍˱ΎΌϴηϢϬϟ΍ϮϠΣ΃΍Ϋ·΍ϮϧΎϛϢϬϨϜϟϭˬϢϬϧϭΪΒόϳ΍ϮϧϮϜϳϢϟϢϬϧ·Ύϣ΃
ϩϮϣήΣ˱ΎΌϴηϢϬϴϠϋ
“They did not used to worship them, but if they made anything lawful for them,
their followers also made it lawful and if anything was prohibited for them by their
scholars and monks, they likewise prohibited it.”
So the mere acceptance of legislation and obeying and following them (in such
legislation) does not rule them as falling into shirk. Rather they believed in making
lawful what Allaah had prohibited and prohibiting what Allaah made lawful. So
the intent is that not everyone who is under the rule of law is a disbeliever.

So the issue requires some explanation between making halaal and not making
halaal, and between customary laws and acts of worship. However, Aboo Baseer
and those who reel around him, have merely initiated the school of thought of the
Khawaarij by making takfeer on account of major sins or the premise of living
under disbelieving rule of law. Also the tafseer of Ibn Taymiyyah of this verse also
rebuts their ‘tafseer’, as he beneficially explained the issue in Majmoo’ al-
Fataawaa, vol.7, p.70-71:
Ύϣ ϞϴϠΤΗ ϲϓ ϢϫϮϋΎσ΃ ΚϴΣ ϢϬϧΎΒϫέϭ ϢϫέΎΒΣ΃ ΍ϭάΨΗ΍ Ϧϳάϟ΍ ˯ϻΆϫϭ
ϦϴϬΟϭϰϠϋϥϮϧϮϜϳˬͿ΍ϞΣ΃ΎϣϢϳήΤΗϭˬͿ΍ϡήΣ
ϥϭΪϘΘόϴϓ ˬϞϳΪΒΘϟ΍ ϰϠϋ ϢϬϧϮόΒΘϴϓ Ϳ΍ ϦϳΩ ΍ϮϟΪΑ ϢϬϧ΃ ΍ϮϤϠόϳ ϥ΃ΎϤϫΪΣ΃
ϢϬϧ΃ ϢϬϤϠϋ ϊϣ ϢϬ΋Ύγ΅ήϟ Ύ˱ϋΎΒΗ΍ ˬͿ΍ ϞΣ΃ Ύϣ ϢϳήΤΗϭ ˬͿ΍ ϡήΣ Ύϣ ϞϴϠΤΗ
΍ϮϧϮϜϳϢϟϥ·ϭˬ˱ΎϛήηϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ϪϠόΟΪϗϭˬήϔϛ΍άϬϓˬϝϮγήϟ΍ϦϳΩ ΍ϮϔϟΎΧ
Ϫϧ΃ϪϤϠϋϊϣϦϳΪϟ΍ϑϼΧϲϓϩήϴϏϊΒΗ΍ϦϣϥΎϜϓˬϢϬϟϥϭΪΠδϳϭϢϬϟϥϮ˷Ϡμϳ
˯ϻΆϫϞΜϣ˱ΎϛήθϣϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ϪϟΎϗΎϣϥϭΩϪϟΎϗΎϣΪϘΘϋ΍ϭˬϦϳΪϟ΍ϑϼΧ
Ύ˱ ΘΑΎΛ ϡ΍ήΤϟ΍ ϢϳήΤΗϭ ϝϼΤϟ΍ ϞϴϠΤΘΑ ϢϬϧΎϤϳ·ϭ ϢϫΩΎϘΘϋ΍ ϥϮϜϳ ϥ΃ ϲϧΎΜϟ΍
ϲΘϟ΍ϲλΎόϤϟ΍ϦϣϪϠόϔϳΎϣϢϠδϤϟ΍ϞόϔϳΎϤϛˬͿ΍ΔϴμόϣϲϓϢϫϮϋΎσ΃ϦϜϟ
˰ϫ΍ΏϮϧάϟ΍Ϟϫ΃ϦϣϢϬϟΎΜϣ΃ϢϜΣϢϬϟϭˬϲλΎόϣΎϬϧ΃ΪϘΘόϳ
Those who took their scholars and monks as lords obeyed them in making lawful
what Allaah had prohibited and prohibited what Allaah had made lawful and this
has two aspects:
Firstly: That they know that they have substituted the deen of Allaah and then
followed them in that change and believed in the making lawful of what Allaah had
prohibited and in the prohibition of what Allaah had made lawful. So they did this
following their leaders while knowing that it opposed the deen of the Messenger
(sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) and this is kufr and Allaah and His Messenger have
classified such an individual a disbeliever, even though they do not pray or
prostrate to them. Whoever follows other than Allaah in opposing the deen,
while knowing that it opposes the deen and believe in what other than
Allaah and His Messenger have stated is a Mushrik.
Secondly: That they have firm belief and eemaan about legalising the halaal and
prohibiting the haraam, however they obeyed them in disobedience to Allaah. This
is like a Muslim who commits an act of disobedience which he firmly believes is
wrong and disobedience, they have the same ruling as them as being sinful.

Therefore, the verses intend whoever takes scholars and worshippers as lords is in
regards to tahleel (legalising) and tahreem (prohibiting) in belief and action, not in
just mere action alone. The shirk that Banee Ismaa’eel fell into was due to their
placing Rabbis and religious scholars at the same level as Allaah in making lawful
and making unlawful and turning away from the commandments of Allaah. What
also indicates this is the tafseer of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam)
which we have mentioned. The saying of Hudhayfah (radi Allaahu ’anhu) when
he asked about the verse was: “They did not fast for them or pray to them, but
they made lawful for them what Allaah had prohibited and they would prohibit for
them what Allaah had made lawful. This was how they made them lords besides
Allaah.”1
So those who obeyed the one who made lawful what Allaah prohibited, or the
one prohibited what Allaah made lawful, are of two categories:
1. They either agreed with their making halaal or making haraam and there
is no doubt about their kufr.
2. Or they disagreed with the one who made halaal and made haraam but
obeyed them out of disobedience to Allaah and such a person is not made
takfeer of. His action is like other acts of disobedience – the Khawaarij past
and present oppose this.
So just as the verses do not contain that which indicates that they were revealed in
regards to all of the Bani Israa’eel without exception, rather the Qur’aan indicates
the opposite of this,
˸Ϣϫ˵ ϭ˴ ˶Ϟ˸ϴϠ͉ϟ΍˯Ύ˴ϧ΁˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˶ΕΎ˴ϳ΁˴ϥϮ˵Ϡ˸Θϳ˴ ˲ΔϤ˴ ΋˶ ΂˴ϗ˲Δϣ͉ ΃˵˶ΏΎ˴ΘϜ˶ ˸ϟ΍˶Ϟ˸ϫ΃˴˸Ϧϣ͋ ˯΍˴Ϯγ

˴ ˸΍Ϯ˵δ˸ϴϟ˴ͽ
ͼϥ
˴ ϭ˵ΪΠ
˵ ˸δϳ˴
“They are not [all] the same; among the People of the Scripture is a
community standing [in obedience], reciting the verses of Allaah during
periods of the night and prostrating [in prayer].”
{Aali ’Imraan (3): 113}

)> D+A+1M

Shaykh ’Uthaymeen (raheemahullaah) transmitted from Ibn Taymiyyah

(raheemahullaah) wherein he said:
Ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed can be split into two:
1. Where one substitutes the rule of Allaah while knowing the rule of Allaah, however
he views that the opposing rules are better and more beneficial for the people than
the rule of Allaah; or that it is the same as the rule of Allaah; or that to rule by other
than what Allaah has revealed is allowed and he institutes it as a law that is referred
to – then the likes of these are disbelievers who have committed kufr which expels
them from the deen. This is because the person who falls into this is neither pleased
with Allaah as Lord nor with the Messenger of Allaah, neither with Islaam as a deen
and the verses is applied to such likes,
ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵Ϩϗ˶ Ϯ˵ϳ˳ϡ˸ϮϘ˴ ϟ͋Ύ˱Ϥ˸ϜΣ˵ ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴Ϧϣ˶ ˵Ϧδ˴ ˸Σ΃˴˸Ϧϣ˴ ϭ˴ ˴ϥϮ˵ϐ˸Βϳ˴ ˶Δϴ͉ Ϡ˶ϫ˶ Ύ˴Π˸ϟ΍˴Ϣ˸ϜΤ˵ ϓ˴ ΃˴ͽ
“Then is it the judgement of [the time of] ignorance they desire? But who is
better than Allaah in judgement for a people who are certain [in faith].”
And:

2. That one substitutes the rule of Allaah with a specific law in specific matters without
instituting it as a law which has to be referred to and this has three states:
a. This is done while having knowledge of the rule of Allaah and believing that what
he has done in opposition is better for people and that it is the same, or he believes
that to refer to it is permissible – this is a disbeliever who is ejected from the fold of
Islaam, as has preceded.
b. This is done while having knowledge of the rule of Allaah and believing that it is
better and more beneficial, however he opposes it out of fear of the harm that the
ruled will do to him – this is a dhaalim and not a disbeliever and the saying of
Allaah is to be applied to him,
ͼϥ
˴ Ϯ˵Ϥϟ˶Ύ͉ψϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵Ϫ˷Ϡϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

“And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed then it is those who are
the wrongdoers.”
c. He is like the above but his desire overcame him or due to a worldly reason he
referred to it. This person is sinful and not a disbeliever and the following verse of
Allaah is applied to him,
ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵Ϙγ˶ Ύ˴ϔ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

“And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed then it is those who are
the defiantly disobedient.”
This issue, ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed, is from the major issues
which the rulers today have been tested with. It is for a person not to be hasty in
judging them rulers with what they do not rightfully deserve, until the truth has been
clarified to them, because the issue is dangerous. We ask Allaah to rectify the leaders
of the Muslims and their subjects.1
I say: as for the second verse which Aboo Baseer tries to use as a proof for his
arguments, then it is the saying of Allaah
ϲ˶ϓ˸΍ϭ˵ΪΠ
˶ ϳ˴ ˴ϻ͉ϢΛ˵ ˸ϢϬ˵ Ϩ˴ ˸ϴΑ˴ ˴ήΠ
˴ ϳ˵ ˴ϰΘ͉Σ
˴ ˴ϥϮ˵Ϩϣ˶ ˸Άϳ˵ ˴ϻ˴ϚΑ͋ έ˴ ϭ˴ ˴ϼϓ˴ ͽ
˴ ϳ˵ ϭ˴ ˴Ζ˸ϴπ
˴ ˸ϢϬ˶ δ
˶ ϔ˵ ϧ˴΃
{an-Nisaa (4): 65}
Then Aboo Baseer says,
ϚϟΫϥΈϓˬϞΟϭΰϋͿ΍ωήηϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϟΎΑϻ·ϪΒΣΎμϟΖΒΜϳϻϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϥΎϛ΍Ϋ·
Ϧϳήϣ΃ϰϠϋϝΪϳ
ϻϭˬϥΎϤϳϺϟρήηϪϧϷˬϪϧΎΤΒγϪϟΓΩΎΒϋϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ωήηϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϟ΍ϥ΃ΎϬϟϭ΃
ϲϧΎΜϟ΍ήϣϷ΍Ύϣ΃ϞΟϭΰϋͿΓΩΎΒϋωϮϧϦϤπΘϳϥΎϛ΍Ϋ·ϻ·ϥΎϤϳϺϟ˱Ύσήη˯ϲηϥϮϜϳ

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDD6KD\NK,EQ¶8WKD\PHHQYROS

ϥ΃ϡΪϘΗΪϗϭˬϪΒΣΎλϦϋϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϲϔϨϳϞΟϭΰϋͿ΍ωήηϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϟ΍ϡΪϋϥ΃ϮϬϓ
ϦϣϪΟϭϲϓϮϟϭˬϕϮϠΨϤϟ΍ΓΩΎΒϋϦϤπΘϳϱάϟ΍ϙήθϟΎΑϻ·ϪΒΣΎλϦϋϰϔϨϳϻϥΎϤϳϹ΍
ϪΟϭϷ΍
“If eemaan is not affirmed except by referring judgement to the Divine Legislation of
Allaah then this indicates 2 matters:
Firstly: referring judgement to the Divine Legislation of Allaah is an act of worship to
Allaah, because it is a condition of eemaan. Nothing can be a condition for eemaan
except if it includes a type of worship of Allaah. As for the second matter: it is the
lack of referring judgement back to Allaah, this negates eemaan from the one who
does it. It has preceded that eemaan is not negated from a person except by
committing shirk which includes worshiping the creation, even in any aspect
whatsoever.”
I say: This juhool (Aboo Baseer) negates the foundation of eemaan and its reality
from all who do not rule by the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) in any
aspect and from here he judges them with committing kufr in belief without any
suitable explanation! I did not find any Mufassir who mentioned the likes of this
general ruling which Aboo Baseer has made! The origin of his view is with none
other than Sayyid Qutb. Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said:
ϰϟΎόΗϝΎϘϓ˭ϝϮγήϟ΍ϭͿ΍ϰϟ·ϩϭΩήϳϥ΃˯ϲηϲϓ΍ϮϋίΎϨΗ΍Ϋ·ϢϬϠϛϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍Ϳ΍ήϣ΃Ϊϗϭ
Allaah has instructed all of the Muslims to refer back to Allaah and His Messenger,
Allaah says,
˸ϢϜ˵ Ϩ˶ϣ˶ή˸ϣϷ
˴ ΍ϲ˶ϟ˸ϭ΃˵ϭ˴ ˴ϝϮ˵γή͉ ϟ΍˸΍Ϯ˵όϴ˶σ΃˴ϭ˴ ˴ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˸΍Ϯ˵όϴ˶σ΃˴˸΍Ϯ˵Ϩϣ˴ ΁˴Ϧϳ˶άϟ͉΍Ύ˴Ϭϳ͊΃˴Ύ˴ϳ
˴ϥϮ˵Ϩϣ˶ ˸ΆΗ˵ ˸ϢΘ˵ Ϩ˵ϛϥ˶·˶ϝϮ˵γή͉ ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍ϰ˴ϟ·˶˵ϩϭ͊Ωή˵ ϓ˴ ˳˯˸ϲη
˴ ϲ˶ϓ˸ϢΘ˵ ˸ϋί˴ Ύ˴ϨΗ˴ ϥ˶Έϓ˴
ϼ ˴ ˸Σ΃˴ϭ˴ ˲ή˸ϴΧ
˱ ϳ˶ϭ˸΄Η˴ ˵Ϧδ ˴ ˴Ϛϟ˶Ϋ˴ ˶ήΧ
˶ ϵ΍˶ϡ˸Ϯϴ˴ ˸ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϪϠ˷ϟΎ˶Α
“O you who have believed, obey Allaah and obey the Messenger and those in
authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allaah
and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allaah and the Last Day. That is
the best [way] and best in result.”
{an-Nisaa (4): 59}
And Allaah says,

˸΍ϭ˵ΪΠ
˶ ϳ˴ ˴ϻ͉ϢΛ˵ ˸ϢϬ˵ Ϩ˴ ˸ϴΑ˴ ˴ήΠ
˴ ϳ˵ ˴ϰΘ͉Σ
˴ ˴ϥϮϨ˵ ϣ˶ ˸Άϳ˵ ˴ϻ˴ϚΑ͋έ˴ ϭ˴ ˴ϼϓ˴ ͽ
˴ ϳ˵ ϭ˴ ˴Ζ˸ϴπ
˴ ˸ϢϬ˶ δ
˶ ϔ˵ ϧ˴΃ϲ˶ϓ
{an-Nisaa (4): 65}
ϻ Ϫϧ΃ Ϫδϔϧ ϰϠϋ Ϳ΍ Ϣδϗ΃ ΪϘϓ ϢϬϨϴΑ ήΠη ΎϤϴϓ ϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ ϢϴϜΤΗ ϡΰΘϠϳ Ϣϟ ϦϤϓ
ˬϩ΍ϮϫϊΒΗ΍ϭϰμϋϦϜϟˬ˱΍ήϫΎχϭ˱ΎϨσΎΑϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ϢϜΤϟ˱ΎϣΰΘϠϣϥΎϛϦϣΎϣ΃ϭˬϦϣΆϳ
ήϣϷ΍ΓϻϭήϴϔϜΗϰϠϋΝέ΍ϮΨϟ΍ΎϬΑΞΘΤϳΎϤϣΔϳϵ΍ϩάϫϭˬΓΎμόϟ΍ϦϣϪϟΎΜϣ΃ΔϟΰϨϤΑ΍άϬϓ
˰ϫ΍Ϳ΍ϢϜΣϮϫϢϫΩΎϘΘϋ΍ϥ΃ϥϮϤϋΰϳϢΛˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϥϮϤϜΤϳϻϦϳάϟ΍
So whoever does not abide by the judgement of Allaah and His Messenger in any
disagreements which arise among them, then Allaah has sworn by Himself that they
do not believe. As for the one who abides by Allaah and His Messenger’s
judgements inwardly and outwardly, but he commits sins and follows his desire, this
case is the same as that of disobedience. This ayah is what the Khawaarij use as
a proof for making takfeer of the rulers who do not judge by what Allaah has
revealed, then they claim that they believe that it is Allaah’s judgement.1
Imaam Ibn Battah in his book al-Ibaanah has a chapter entitled ‘Sins which lead a
person to commit kufr which expels from the religion’ and he mentions in the
chapter:
ΔϠϤϟ΍ϦϋϞϗΎϧήϴϏήϐλ΃ήϔϛϪϧ΃ϰϠϋϦϴόΑΎΘϟ΍ϭΔΑΎΤμϟ΍έΎΛ΁Ωέϭ΃ϭˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϟ΍
Ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed – the narrations from the
Companions and the Taabi’oon highlight that it is minor kufr which does
not expel a person from the religion.
Shaykh Sa’dee (raheemahullaah) said in his tafseer of the verse:
ϦϳΪϟ΍ΐΗ΍ήϣϞϤϜΘγ΍ΪϘϓ˰ϢϴϠδΘϟ΍ϭΝήΤϟ΍˯ΎϔΘϧ΍ϭϢϴϜΤΘϟ΍ϲϨόϳ˰ΐΗ΍ήϤϟ΍ϩάϫϞϤϜΘγ΍ϦϤϓ
ϢϜΣϪϠϓϪϣ΍ΰΘϟ΍ϊϣϪϛήΗϦϣϭήϓΎϛϮϬϓˬϪϟϡΰΘϠϣήϴϏˬέϮϛάϤϟ΍ϢϴϜΤΘϟ΍΍άϫϙήΗϦϣϭˬΎϬϠϛ
ϦϴϴλΎόϟ΍ϦϣϪϟΎΜϣ΃

0LQKDDMXV6XQQDKD+M+0

Whoever fulfils this level, meaning he renders judgement accordingly, and has no
resistance, accepting with full conviction, then he has completely fulfilled the
necessary level of religion. And whoever leaves this rendering of judgement
mentioned, not abiding by it, then the ruling for him is similar to that of the
disobedient.
As for Aboo Baseer trying to use the words of Ibn ul-Qayyim (raheemahullaah) as
a proof for his position then it is false because the position of Ibn ul-Qayyim is
very clear in the issue of ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed. In his
book Hukm Taarik Salaah, Ibn Qayyim explains what the Salaf were upon, he
says,
ΩΎϨϋϭΩϮΤΟήϔϛϭˬϞϤϋήϔϛϥΎϋϮϧήϔϜϟ΍ϥ΃ϮϫϭˬήΧ΁Ϟλ΃ΎϨϫΎϫϭ
Ώήϟ΍˯ΎϤγ΃Ϧϣ˭˱΍ΩΎϨϋϭ˱΍ΩϮΤΟͿ΍ΪϨϋϦϣϪΑ˯ΎΟϝϮγήϟ΍ϥ΃ϢϠϋΎϤΑήϔϜϳϥ΃ΩϮΤΠϟ΍ήϔϜϓ
ϪϣΎϜΣ΃ϭˬϪϟΎόϓ΃ϭˬϪΗΎϔλϭ
ϪΟϭϞϛϦϣϥΎϤϳϹ΍ΩΎπϳήϔϜϟ΍΍άϫϭ
ϩΩΎπϳϻΎϣϰϟ·ϭϥΎϤϳϹ΍ΩΎπϳΎϣϰϟ·ϢδϘϨϴϓϞϤόϟ΍ήϔϛΎϣ΃ϭ
ϥΎϤϳϹ΍ΩΎπϳϪΒγϭˬϲΒϨϟ΍ϞΘϗϭˬϒΤμϤϟΎΑΔϧΎϬΘγϻ΍ϭˬϢϨμϠϟΩϮΠδϟΎϓ
ϪϨϋϰϔϨϳϥ΃ϦϜϤϳϻϭ˱ΎότϗϲϠϤόϟ΍ήϔϜϟ΍ϦϣϮϬϓ˭Γϼμϟ΍ϙήΗϭˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϟ΍Ύϣ΃ϭ
ϪϴϠϋϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ϪϘϠσ΃ϥ΃ΪόΑήϔϜϟ΍Ϣγ΍
Ϳ΍ϝϮγέκϨΑ˰ήϓΎϛΓϼμϟ΍ϙέΎΗϭˬήϓΎϛͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϛΎΤϟΎϓεϞϤϋήϔϛϮϫϦϜϟϭ˰
ϝϮγέϲϤδϳϭˬ˱΍ήϓΎϛͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϛΎΤϟ΍˰ϪϧΎΤΒγ˰Ϳ΍ϲϤδϳϥ΃ϊϨΘϤϤϟ΍ϦϣϭˬΩΎϘΘϋ΍ήϔϛϻˬ
Ϳ΍εͿ΍ϝϮγέϰϔϧΪϗϭˬήϔϜϟ΍Ϣγ΍ΎϬϴϠϋϖϠτϳϻϭˬ˱΍ήϓΎϛΓϼμϟ΍ϙέΎΗεˬϲϧ΍ΰϟ΍ϦϋϥΎϤϳϹ΍
ϦϣήϓΎϛϮϬϓˬϥΎϤϳϹ΍Ϣγ΍ϪϨϋϲϔϧ΍Ϋ·ϭˬϪϘ΋΍ϮΑϩέΎΟϦϣ΄ϳϻϦϤϋϭˬήϤΨϟ΍ΏέΎηϭˬϕέΎδϟ΍ϭ
Ώήπϳˬ˱΍έΎϔϛϱΪόΑ΍ϮόΟήΗϻϪϟϮϗϚϟάϛϭˬΩΎϘΘϋϻ΍ϭΩϮΤΠϟ΍ήϔϛϪϨϋϰϔΘϧ΍ϭˬϞϤόϟ΍ΔϬΟ
˰ϫ΍ϞϤϋήϔϛ΍άϬϓξόΑΏΎϗέϢϜπόΑ
Here there is another foundation which is that Kufr is of two types: Kufr ’Amalee
(Kufr of action) and Kufr ul-Juhood (rejection) and ’inad (stubbornness). Kufr ul-
Juhood is: disbelieving in what is known to be from what the Messenger came with
out of rejection and stubbornness and of the Names of the Lord and His Attributes,
Actions and Regulations. This type of Kufr contradicts eemaan. As for Kufr ’Amali
(Kufr of actions): it is divided into whatever contradicts eemaan and what does not.
Therefore, sujood (prostrating) to idols, disrespecting the Qur’aan, killing the
Prophet and abusing him all contradicts eemaan. As for ruling by other than what
Allaah has revealed and leaving the prayer then it is Kufr ’Amalee and it is not
possible to negate the title of Kufr from the person except after Allaah and His
Messenger have absolutely applied it. The one who rules by other than what Allaah
has revealed is a disbeliever and the one who abandons the prayer is a disbeliever,

according to the text from the Messenger of Allaah, however it is Kufr of actions
(‘Amalee) not Kufr ’I’tiqaad (Kufr of belief). It is not possible that Allaah would
name the one who rules by other than what Allaah has revealed as being a “kaafir”
and the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) named the one who
leaves the prayer as being a “kaafir” when the title of Kufr was not absolutely
applied to them. The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) negated
eemaan from the one who commits zinaa, the thief, the one who drinks alcohol and
the one whose neighbour is not safe from his harm. So if the title of having eemaan
was negated for an individual who falls into such things then he is a disbeliever
from the angle of action but the Kufr of Juhood (rejection) and ‘I’tiqaad is not
applied to them. Likewise, the hadeeth (which is agreed upon): “Do not return to
being disbelievers after me, by some of you hitting the necks of (i.e. killing) others.”
This is kufr of action1.2
Therefore, what we say about the issue of ruling by other than what Allaah has
revealed we said before and we say now, in accordance with the understanding of
the Salaf always and there is no understanding after the understanding of the
Salaf, and what is after the truth except clear misguidance. Allaah says,
˶Ϟϴ˶Βγ
˴ ˴ή˸ϴϏ
˴ ˸ϊΒ˶ Θ͉ϳ˴ ϭ˴ ϯ˴ΪϬ˵ ˸ϟ΍˵Ϫϟ˴˴Ϧϴ͉Β˴ Η˴ Ύ˴ϣ˶Ϊ˸όΑ˴ Ϧ˶ϣ˴ϝϮ˵γή͉ ϟ΍˶ϖϗ˶ Ύ˴θϳ˵ Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ
ͼ΍˱ήϴ˶μϣ˴ ˸Ε˯Ύ˴γϭ˴ ˴ϢϨ͉Ϭ˴ Ο
˴ ˶ϪϠ˶˸μϧ˵ ϭ˴ ϰ͉ϟϮ˴ Η˴ Ύ˴ϣ˶Ϫϟ͋Ϯ˴ ϧ˵ ˴Ϧϴ˶Ϩϣ˶ ˸ΆϤ˵ ˸ϟ΍

$V6DODDWZD+XNP7DDULNXKX+JBJE
B # DO,QWLVDDU OL$KO LW7DZKHHG ZD¶U5XG ¶DODD PDQ -DDGLO ¶DQ DW7DZDDJKHHW
'

)Q((' D
)Q((&'
&'(
G+; )Q(((³$QGDVIRU
ZDDPPD´ D
³UXOLQJKXNP´' )Q((
( ³ZD $PPD DO+XNPµ$QG DV IRU UXOLQJ¶´ ' G
( ' D )Q((D
&
HHPDDQ
D ( +
G ' '
&
HHPDDQ
C
( &+ ³0DD
\XGDDGDO(HPDDQ µZKDWHYHU RSSRVHV HHPDDQ¶´
' ' ³DO+XNPEL JKD\UL
PDDDQ]DOD$OODDKµUXOLQJE\RWKHUWKDQZKDW$OODDKKDVUHYHDOHG¶´
) Q(( D ' ( ' D
&
' HHPDDQ
D ( , G
+ '

!

“And whoever opposes the Messenger after guidance has become clear to
him and follows other than the way of the believers We will give him what
he has taken and drive him into Hell, and evil it is as a destination.”
{an-Nisaa (4): 115}
Aboo Baseer says,

ΎϤϛ˱ΎΒϳήϏΩΎϋΪϗϦϳΪϟ΍΍άϫϥ΃ϙέΪϳ˰Ϳ΍ήϴϏϰϟ·ϢϛΎΤΘϟ΍ϱ΃˰ΔϣΎϬϟ΍ΔϴπϘϟ΍ϩάϫϦϣΔϣϷ΍ϝΎΣϞϣ΄ΘϳϦϤϓ
ϲϫΔόΒΘϤϟ΍Δόϳήθϟ΍ϥ΃ϭˬΕϮϏΎτϟ΍Ϯϫ˰έΎϳΪϟ΍ϭέΎμϣϷ΍ήΜϛ΃ϲϓ˰ωήθϤϟ΍ϭϢϛΎΤϟ΍ϥ΃ΚϴΣˬΪη΃ϭ΃ΪΑ
ϲϓ΍ϮϠΧΪϓˬϚϟΫϦϣ˱ΎΟήΣϢϬδϔϧ΃ϲϓ΍ϭΪΠϳϥ΃ϥϭΩϦϣϭΔϴϋ΍ϮσΎϬϴϟ·ϥϮϤϛΎΤΘϳαΎϨϟ΍ϭΕϮϏΎτϟ΍Δόϳήη
Ϧϣ˰ϚϟΫϊϣϮ˰ϢϬϨϣΪΠΗΎϤΑήϟϭˬϥϭήόθϳϻϭ΃ϥϭήόθϳΚϴΣϦϣΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϥϭΪΒόϳϦϳάϟ΍ϦϴϛήθϤϟ΍Γήϣί
ϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ϦϣϪϧ΃ϢϋΰϳϭˬϲϠμϳ
“Whoever contemplates the condition of the Ummah in light of the important issue,
meaning: referring judgment to other than Allaah, will realize that this deen has
become strange as it begun and things are worse as the ruler and ruled, in most
lands, is a taaghoot and the legislation that is followed is the legislation of taaghoot
and the people refer judgment to it out of obedience without them finding any
problem in that. They have entered into the Mushrikeen who worship taaghoot
whether they perceive it or not, and maybe you will find among them those who
pray and claiming to be Muslims!”1
I say: This takfeer of the ruler and the ruled which is clearer than the way of
Sayyid Qutb! This saying, to connect the residents of an abode of Islaam with the
condition of their rulers, is from the most apparent principles of the Khawaarij. So
applying this speech in this way is a dangerous venture, merely referring to other
than what Allaah has revealed is not a taaghoot, rather it is between kufr and a
major sin and the ’Ulama have explained this. Therefore there is a difference
between the case of a person who says the Shahaadah, does some actions from
the symbols of Islaam and does not openly reject (make juhood) the rule of
Allaah, and between the one who says that referring judgment and arbitration to
other than what Allaah has revealed is better or that ruling by what Allaah has
revealed is not suitable for the contemporary era or that it is allowed to rule by
other than what Allaah has revealed.

$W7DDJKRRW+0M?

Let’s say for arguments sake that what you say (Aboo Baseer) is correct about
the ruler who you claim is a “taaghoot”, then what about the ruled who pray and
fast, are they Muslims?! For the people do not refer judgment to him out of
obedience rather he makes it obligatory on them to follow it, which is exactly like
your condition (Aboo Baseer!) with the Dunyawee Western system which you live
under!
The belief that allows and permits ruling by other than what Allaah has
revealed is kufr and rejecting anything from the obligations and making it lawful
that Allaah has prohibited is also kufr, however takfeer of a specific person
depends on establishing the proofs before takfeer is made of an evil. If we look at
the Salaf we see that mostly they did not apply takfeer for some actions,
innovations and statements, and when they did apply specific takfeer they were
strict in the application because the one who fell into the action could have been
ignorant, incorrect in interpreting, new in Islaam and the likes which all prevent
making specific takfeer on an individual. Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah
(raheemahullaah) states:
αΎϨϟ΍ϪϴϓϢϜΤϳΎϤϣϚϟΫβϴϟϪϟϮγέϭͿ΍ϦϋΓΎϘϠΘϤϟ΍ϡΎϜΣϻ΍ϦϣϥΎϤϳϻ΍ϥΎϓ
ϰϓΖΒΜϳϰΘΣήϓΎϛϪϧΎΑϚϟΫϝΎϗκΨηϞϛϰϓϢϜΤϳϥ΍ΐΠϳϻϭϢϬ΋΍Ϯϫ΃ϭϢϬϧϮϨψΑ
ϩΪϬϋΏήϘϟϝϼΣΎΑήϟ΍ϭ΍ήϤΨϟ΍ϥ΍ϝΎϗϦϣϞΜϣϪόϧ΍ϮϣϰϔΘϨΗϭήϴϔϜΘϟ΍ρϭήηϪϘΣ
Ϫϧ΍ϻϭϥ΁ήϘϟ΍ϦϣϪϧ΍ΪϘΘόϳϢϟϭϩήϜϧ΃ΎϣϼϛϊϤγϭ΍ΓΪϴόΑΔϳΩΎΑϰϓϪ΋ϮθϨϟϭ΍ϡϼγϻΎΑ
ϢϠγϭϪϴϠϋͿ΍ϰϠλͿ΍ϝϮγέΚϳΩΎΣ΍Ϧϣ
ϥϮϜθϳΔΑΎΤμϟ΍ϥΎϛΎϤϛϭΎϬϟΎϗϰΒϨϟ΍ϥ΍ϩΪϨϋΖΒΜϳϰΘΣ˯Ύϴη΍ήϜϨϳϒϠδϟ΍ξόΑϥΎϛΎϤϛ
ϞΜϣϭϢϠγϭϪϴϠϋͿ΍ϰϠλͿ΍ϝϮγέϚϟΫϦϋ΍Ϯϟ΄δϳϰΘΣϚϟΫήϴϏϭͿ΍Δϳ΅έϞΜϣ˯Ύϴη΍ϲϓ
ϻ˯ϻΆϫϥΎϓϚϟΫϮΤϧϭͿ΍ϦϋϞο΍ϲϠόϟϢϴϟ΍ϰϓϲϧϭέΫϭϰϧϮϘΤγΎϓΖϣΎϧ΃΍Ϋ΍ϝΎϗϯάϟ΍
ϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ϝΎϗΎϤϛΔϟΎγήϟΎΑΔΠΤϟ΍ϢϬϴϠϋϡϮϘΗϰΘΣϥϭήϔϜϳ
For eemaan is judged according to the rules that are received from Allaah and His
Messenger, those rules are not determined by what people think and desire. Nor is
it obligating that every person who says that (a statement of kufr) be judged
as a kaafir until the conditions of takfeer are realized regarding his case and
all of the preventative factors are removed. Like in the case of one who says
that alcohol or interest is halaal due to being new in Islaam or raised in the
far away villages or hears some speech which he denies and does not believe
is from the Qur’aan of from the ahaadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah

(sallallaahu alayhi wassallam). This is just how some of the Salaf used to
deny something until it had been affirmed that the Prophet said it, like when
some of the Companions doubted seeing Allaah on the Day of Judgment and
other matters until they asked the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi
wassallam) about it and like the one who said “When I have died, burn me, then
crush me and scatter [my ashes] into the sea” because he was afraid of Allaah and
the likes of these matter. These are not made takfeer of until the proofs of
the message are established on them, as Allaah says,
ͼϞ
˶γ˵ ή͊ ϟ΍˴Ϊ˸όΑ˴ ˲ΔΠ
͉Σ˵ ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍ϰ˴Ϡϋ
˴ ˶αΎ͉ϨϠ˶ϟ˴ϥϮ˵Ϝϳ˴ ͉ϼΌ˴ ϟ˶ͽ
“…so that mankind will have no argument against Allaah after the
messengers.”
{an-Nisaa (4): 165}
ϥΎϴδϨϟ΍ϭ΄τΨϟ΍ϦϋΔϣϻ΍ϩάϬϟͿ΍ϰϔϋΪϗϭ
Allaah has forgiven this Ummah for its errors and forgetfulness.1
Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah also said:
΍άϬϓωΪΒϟ΍ϦϣϪϟϭ΄ΗΎϣξόΑϲϓςϠϏΪϗϭϪΑ˯ΎΟΎϣϭϝϮγήϟΎΑϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϪΒϠϗϲϓϥΎϛϦϣΎϣ΃
ϲϓϦϜϳϢϟϭˬΎϬϟ˱΍ήϴϔϜΗϭΔϣϸϟ˱ϻΎΘϗϭΔϋΪΑαΎϨϟ΍ήϬχ΃Ϧϣ΍ϮϧΎϛΝέ΍ϮΨϟ΍ϭˬ˱ϼλ΃ήϓΎϜΑβϴϟ
ϦϴϤϟΎψϟ΍ϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ϢϜΤΑϢϬϴϓ΍ϮϤϜΣϞΑˬϩήϴϏϻϭΐϟΎσϲΑ΃ϦΑϲϠϋϻϢϫήϔ˷ϜϳϦϣΔΑΎΤμϟ΍
˰ϫ΍ϦϳΪΘόϤϟ΍
As for whoever has eemaan in his heart of the Messengers and what he came with
yet erred in some interpretations and fell into innovation, then such a person is not
a disbeliever at all. The Khawaarij were the most apparent people in the innovation
and fighting against the Ummah and making takfeer of the Ummah yet none of the
Sahaabah made takfeer of them, neither ’Ali ibn Abee Taalib nor anyone else. Rather
they were judged as being transgressing oppressive Muslims.2
Contemplate on these, and other, evidences and you will know the difference
between the way of the ’Ulama and the way of Aboo Baseer at-Tartoosee and
those like him from the innovators and ‘thinkers’ and that they only transmit that
from the Salaf which justifies their ideologies.

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+0M+?M??
B)+D+J+BJE


7+( 35,1&,3/( 2) /29( $1' +$7( >$//(*,$1&( $1'
',6$92:$/@ $&&25',1* 72 $%22 %$6((5 $7
7$57226((
Aboo Baseer stated under the heading ‘Allegiance and Disavowal [Love and Hate]’:

ϦϤϓˬΓ΍ΩΎόϤϟ΍ϭΓϻϮϤϟ΍ϭϩήϜϟ΍ϭΐΤϟ΍ΓΩΎΒόϟ΍ϰϤδϣϲϓϚϟάϛϞΧΪϳΎϤϣ
ͿϩήϜϳϭͿΐΤϳΚϴΤΑˬͿ΍ϲϓϭϰϟΎόΗͿϪϫήϛϭϪΒΣϭϪΗ΍ΩΎόϣϭϪΗϻ΍ϮϣΖϧΎϛ
Ύϣ ϰοήϳϭ ˬϪϟϮγέϭ Ϳ΍ ϱΩΎόϳ Ϧϣ ϱΩΎόϳϭ ˬϪϟϮγέϭ Ϳ΍ ϲϟ΍Ϯϳ Ϧϣ ϲϟ΍Ϯϳϭ
Ϊϗϭ ˬϩΪΣϭ ϰϟΎόΗ Ϳ ΍˱ΪΒϋ ϥϮϜϳάΌϨϴΣϮϬϓ ˬͿ΍ξϐΒϳ Ύϣ ξϐΒϳϭ ˬͿ΍ ϲοήϳ
ϮϬϓˬϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ήϴϏϪΗ΍ΩΎόϣϭϪΗϻ΍ϮϣϭˬϪϫήϛϭϪΒΣρΎϨϣϥΎϛϦϣϭˬϪϧΎϤϳ·ϞϤϛ
ϪΗΩΎΒϋ ϲϓ ϞΧ΍Ωϭ ˰ ϪϟΎϜη΃ϭ ϩέϮλ ΕΩΪόΗϭ ΖϔϠΘΧ΍ ΎϤϬϣ ˰ ήϴϐϟ΍ ΍άϬϟ ΪΒϋ
ϦϣϝΎϗϪϧ΃ εϲΒϨϟ΍Ϧϋ΢λΪϘϓΚϳΪΤϟ΍ϲϓϭ ήϘϳϢϟϡ΃ϚϟάΑϪϟ ήϗ΃ϪδϳΪϘΗϭ
ΔΤϴΤμϟ΍ϥΎϤϳϹ΍ϞϤϜΘγ΍ΪϘϓˬͿϊϨϣϭͿϰτϋ΃ϭͿξϐΑ΃ϭͿΐΣ΃
“What is likewise included into what is called ‘an act of worship’ is love and
hate, allegiance and disavowal. So whoever’s allegiance, enmity, love and
hate is for Allaah – wherein a person loves for Allaah, hates for Allaah, allies
to whoever Allaah and His Messenger allies to, has enmity to whoever Allaah
and His Messenger have enmity to, are pleased with what pleases Allaah and
hates what Allaah hates - then when a person does all of these things, the
person will be a servant of Allaah alone and has perfected his eemaan.
Whoever has an object of love, hate, allegiance and disavowal which is other
than Allaah then the person has become a servant to that other object,
regardless of its various and numerous shapes and forms that this may take,
the person is included in worshipping it and sanctifying it. This is whether
the person intentionally establishes this or not. In the hadeeth which has
been authenticated from the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam):
“Whoever loves for Allaah, hates for Allaah, gives for Allaah and takes for Allaah has
perfected his eemaan.””
Then Aboo Baseer states:
“Nothing is to be loved of itself except Allaah and nothing else is to
be loved instead or Him or with Him.”

I say: in my study of the statements of this man (Aboo Baseer) it is noticeable that
he lacks knowledge of the principles and guidelines of the Divine Legislation
which the ’Ulama traverse in explaining knowledge-based issues. This type of
confusion is not strange because the man did not study Usool and as is said,
Whoever is prohibited from Usool,
Is prohibited achieving anything
Because we know that love and hate are included in acts of worship, however
doing it (as an action) not out of worship and servitude is major shirk, because
worship is particular only to Allaah, but mere love, hate and allegiance is not
worship in itself because these things, and other things, are done for Allaah and
for other than Allaah. However, doing them for Allaah is done out of worship and
when done to other than Allaah is not done out of worship, so there has to be
some explanation in light of the evidence and this is the correct way. It is
mentioned in the Qur’aan about love of the Messenger of Allaah,
˲ϝ΍˴Ϯ˸ϣ΃˴ϭ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ Η˵ ή˴ ϴ˶θϋ

˴ ϭ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ Ο
˵ ΍˴ϭ˸ί΃˴ϭ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ ϧ˵ ΍˴Ϯ˸Χ·˶ϭ˴ ˸Ϣϛ˵ ΅˵ ΂˴Ϩ˸Α΃˴ϭ˴ ˸Ϣϛ˵ ΅˵ Ύ˴Α΁˴ϥΎ˴ϛϥ˶·˸Ϟϗ˵ ͽ
˴Ϧϣ͋ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸ϴϟ˴·˶͉ΐΣ
˴ ΃˴Ύ˴Ϭϧ˴ ˸Ϯο ˴ ˸ΨΗ˴ ˲Γέ˴ Ύ˴ΠΗ˶ ϭ˴ Ύ˴ϫϮ˵ϤΘ˵ ˸ϓή˴ Θ˴ ˸ϗ΍
˴ ˸ήΗ˴ ˵Ϧϛ˶ Ύ˴δϣ˴ ϭ˴ Ύ˴ϫΩ˴ Ύ˴δϛ˴ ˴ϥ˸Ϯθ
˴ ˸΍Ϯ˵μΑ͉ ή˴ Θ˴ ϓ˴ ˶ϪϠ˶ϴ˶Βγ
˴ϻ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϩή˶ ˸ϣ΄˴Α˶ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϲΗ˶ ˸΄ϳ˴ ϰ͉ΘΣ ˴ ϲ˶ϓ˳ΩΎ˴ϬΟ
˶ ϭ˴ ˶Ϫϟ˶Ϯ˵γέ˴ ϭ˴ ͽͼϪ˶ Ϡ˷ϟ΍
ͼϦ
˴ ϴ˶Ϙγ
˶ Ύ˴ϔ˸ϟ΍˴ϡ˸ϮϘ˴ ˸ϟ΍ϱ˶Ϊ˸Ϭϳ˴
Say, [O Muhammad], "If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives,
your relatives, wealth which you have obtained, commerce wherein you
fear decline, and dwellings with which you are pleased are more beloved to
you than Allaah and His Messenger and jihaad in His cause, then wait until
Allaah executes His command. And Allaah does not guide the defiantly
disobedient people."
{at-Tawbah (9): 24}
And Allaah says,
͇ήη
˴ ˴Ϯϫ˵ ϭ˴ Ύ˱Ό˸ϴη
˴ ˸΍Ϯ͊ΒΤ
˶ Η˵ ϥ˴΃ϰ˴δϋ
˴ ϭ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ ϟ͉˲ή˸ϴΧ
˴ ˴Ϯϫ˵ ϭ˴ Ύ˱Ό˸ϴη
˴ ˸΍Ϯ˵ϫή˴ ˸ϜΗ˴ ϥ˴΃ϰ˴δϋ
˴ ϭ˴ ͽ
ͼ˸ϢϜ˵ ϟ͉

“But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love
a thing and it is bad for you.”
So based on this, the scholars’ explanations wherein the different types are
mentioned along with the ruling of each type. So love can be major shirk when
one equates other than Allaah with Allaah in absolute specific love for Allaah, if
one loves and hopes in other than Allaah and hopes that other than Allaah will
forgive your sins or enter you into Paradise.
- Love can be minor shirk wherein the heart is connected to an object of love
and usually connection does not reach the level of major shirk.
- Love can be innovation, such as extremism in love of the Messenger of
Allaah without having the same level of love for Allaah.
- Love can be prohibited, such as passionate love for women and for haram
pictures.
- Love can be disliked, such as loving prohibited actions
- Love can be recommended, such as love of gaining nearness to Allaah with
the extra actions of worship.
- As for the obligatory love of Allaah then it includes love for Allaah such as
love of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam)
- Finally, permitted love is such as love of natural things and love of some
types of food, clothes, one’s family, wealth, marriage and the likes which
are natural to love and do not negate the Divine Legislation.
As for the statements of Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn ul-Qayyim which Aboo Baseer
tried to use as proofs then the intent with what they said is about the love of
servitude as nothing is loved in and of itself except Allaah. As for the Prophets and
the righteous then love of them is not due to them of themselves rather it is
because Allaah has instructed to love them. There is no doubt that a person loves
something in and of itself, but can it be then said that this love is the same as
loving other than Allaah with Allaah in things that are unique to Allaah? By Allaah
no! Shaykh ul-Islaam attests to this as the context of his words indicate.
Then Aboo Baseer states – after trying to use the hadeeth of Anas (radi Allaahu
’anhu) as a proof wherein the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) said: “A

servant does not believe until I am more beloved to him than his family, wealth and
all of the people”,:
ϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ήϴϐϟΓΩΎΒϋωϮϧϦϤπΘϳϙήηωϮϨϟϻ·ϥϮϜϳϻϥΎϤϳϹ΍˯ΎϔΘϧ΍ϭ
“The removal of eemaan is only due to a type of shirk which includes a type
of worship to other than Allaah.”1
I say: As for his use of the hadeeth as evidence in negating eemaan, then the
’Ulama have differed about that and if whether the hadeeth is regarding the
foundation and origin of eemaan as the apparentness of the hadeeth indicates or
the perfection of eemaan. Some of the scholars say that negation is for the
foundation and origin of eemaan and Ibn Hajar stated:
ϢϴψόΘϟ΍ϰϨόϣϰϠϋΔΒΤϤϟ΍ϞϤΣϪϧϷϥΎϤϳϹ΍ΔΤμϟρήηϚϟΫϥ΃νΎϴϋϲοΎϘϟ΍ϡϼϛϲϓϭ
˱ΎϣΰϠΘδϣβϴϟΔϴϤψϋϷ΍ΩΎϘΘϋ΍ϥϷΎϨϫ˱΍Ω΍ήϣβϴϟϚϟΫϥ΄ΑϢϬϔϤϟ΍ΐΣΎλϪΒϘόΗϭϝϼΟϹ΍ϭ
ΐΣ΃ΖϧϷήϤϋΚϳΪΤΑϝΪΘγ΍ϢΛϪΘΒΤϣϦϣϩϮϠΧϊϣ˯ϲηϡΎψϋ·ϥΎδϧϹ΍ΪΠϳΪϗΫ·ΔΒΤϤϠϟ
ήϤόϟΔϠλΎΣΖϧΎϛΎϬϧΈϓςϘϓΔϴϤψϋϷ΍ΩΎϘΘϋΎΑΖδϴϟΔΒΤϤϟ΍ϩάϬϓˬϲδϔϧϻ·˯ϲηϞϛϦϣ͉ϲϟ·
˰ϫ΍Ύ˱ότϗϚϟΫϞΒϗ
Within the speech of al-Qaadee ’Ayyaad is that it is a condition for the correctness
of eemaan because love carries the meaning of glorification and magnifying. The
author of al-Mufhim (Imaam al-Qurtubee) also followed this view that the intended
meaning here is not that belief is not a requirement for love when a person is found
to glorify something out of love. Then he used as a proof the hadeeth of ’Umar that
“you are more beloved to me than everything except myself”, this type of love is
not belief in the glorification of something, it is only something which ’Umar
certainly had before that.2
Aboo Baseer stated:
ϲϫˬϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍έΎμϣ΃ϲϓΔϤϛΎΤϟ΍ϭΓΪ΋Ύδϟ΍ΔϴόοϮϟ΍Ϧϴϧ΍ϮϘϟ΍ϭΔϤψϧϷ΍ϩάϫϥ΃ϢϠόϳϪϨϣϭ
ήϴϏϲϓϮϬϓΎϬΑϲοέϭ΃ˬΎϬϴϠϋΓΎϐτϟ΍ϊΑΎΗϭ΃ΎϬϴϓϞΧΩϦϣϭˬϚϟάΑΎϬϠϫ΃ΎϬϤδϳϢϟϥ·ϭϦϳΩ
ϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍˯ΎϤγ΄ΑϰϤδΗϭϡϼγϹ΍Ϣϋίϥ·ϭ˰ΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϦϳΩϲϓϮϫϭ˰Ϳ΍ϦϳΩ
“What is known is that these systems and man-made laws which are referred
to in Muslim countries are a deen even though they are not called that by the

$W7DDJKRRW+1B10
B)DWKXO%DDUHHD++J?

people. Whoever enters them or follows those transgressors into them, or is
pleased with such (man-made) systems is not upon the deen of Allaah, he is
upon the deen of taaghoot, even if he claims Islaam and has a Muslim name.”
I say: Another example of takfeer of Muslim societies due to regulations without a
Divinely Legislated proof. For the mere ruling by man-made law which opposes
the Divine Legislation is not kufr which expels from the religion, except if it is said
that such man-made laws are better than the Divine Legislation of Allaah, or if a
person views that it is permissible to rule by it even if he says that the rule of the
Divine Legislation is better, because he has made lawful what Allaah has
prohibited. As for if does that (i.e. rules by man-made law) due to following his
desires and he knows that he is disobeying Allaah by doing that, then such a
person is of the disobedient people of major sins and he is considered to have
committed minor kufr, minor, minor dhulm and minor fisq. Primarily such a
person is not a disbeliever if the laws are common and customary and not acts of
worship, such as the laws and regulations that Aboo Baseer is humble to and
loves, like the (UK) travel regulations! Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said:
ϊϤΠϤϟ΍ωήθϟ΍ϝΪΑϭ΃ˬϪϴϠϋϊϤΠϤϟ΍ϝϼΤϟ΍ϡήΣϭ΃ϪϴϠϋϊϤΠϤϟ΍ϡ΍ήΤϟ΍ϞϠΣϰΘϣϥΎδϧϹ΍ϭ
ϦϴϟϮϘϟ΍ΪΣ΃ϰϠϋϪϟϮϗϝΰϧ΍άϫϞΜϣϲϓϭˬ˯ΎϬϘϔϟ΍ϕΎϔΗΎΑ˱΍ΪΗήϣ˱΍ήϓΎϛϥΎϛˬϪϴϠϋ
When a person makes halaal whatever is haraam by consensus, or prohibits
whatever is halaal by consensus, or changes whatever is from the Divine
Legislation by consensus - is a disbelieving apostate by agreement of the
fuqahaa. With regards to the likes of these people Allaah revealed,

˰ϫ΍Ϳ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϠϟϞΤΘδϤϟ΍ϱ΃
Meaning: the one who makes it lawful to rule by other than what Allaah has
revealed.1
Aboo Baseer states:

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+J+0J0@

ϦϣϭϩΪΑΎόϟΔΒδϨϟΎΑϩϮϟ΄ϣϭϪϟ·Ϯϫ˰ΓΩΎΒόϟ΍ΕΎϴ΋ΰΟϦϣΔϴ΋ΰΟϲϓϮϟϭ˰ΩϮΒόϤϟ΍ϥ΃ϢϠόϳϪϨϣϭ
ˬΔϴϬϟϹΎΑήϴϐϟ΍΍άϬϟήϗ΃ΪϘϓˬΔϴϬϟϹ΍κ΋ΎμΧϦϣήΒΘόϳΎϤϴϓϞΟϭΰϋͿ΍ήϴϏΓΩΎΒϋϲϓϞΧΩ
ϪϧϭΩϦϣϭ΃Ϳ΍ϊϣ˱ΎϬϟ·άΨΗ΍ϭ
“What is known is that the object that is worshipped, even in some aspects
of worship, is a deity for the one who worships it, whoever includes other
than Allaah in worship in what is considered to be the special characteristics
of Allaah, has accepted this other thing as divine and taken it as an ilah
(deity) with Allaah or instead of Allaah.”
Aboo Baseer continues:
ΔϴλΎΧˬϪδϔϨϟΔϴλΎΨϟ΍ϩάϫ˰ΎϨϧΎϣίϲϓϢϫήΜϛ΃Ύϣϭ˰ϖϠΨϟ΍ϦϣϲϋΪϳϦϣϥΈϓϲϟΎΘϟΎΑϭ
ϩάϬΑϪϟήϗ΃ϦϣϭˬϰϟΎόΗͿ˱΍ΪϧϪδϔϧϦϣϞόΟϭΔϴϬϟϹ΍ϰϋΩ΍ΪϘϓˬϢϳήΤΘϟ΍ϭϞϴϠΤΘϟ΍ϭϊϳήθΘϟ΍
ϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ϥϭΩϦϣϪϟ΄ΗϭˬϪϟΎϬϴοέϭΔϴϬϟϹΎΑϪϟήϗ΃ΪϘϓϪόΑΎΗϭ΃ΔϴλΎΨϟ΍
“Furthermore, whoever from the creation calls to himself in this particular
quality and characteristic of legislating, legalizing and prohibiting, and how
many they are in our time, has claimed divinity and set himself up as a
partner to Allaah. Whoever accepts this from such a person, or follows such
a person who claims this for himself, has accepted divinity for the person
and is pleased with it…”1
This is the third or fourth or fifth recurrence to making takfeer without any
principle as coordinated by Sayyid Qutb and in line with the manhaj of the
Khawaarij! This is repetition of what went before and his statements enrich us to
refute him! This is not a correct resource whatsoever it is only emotional rhetoric
which is far from a precise academic methodology. The creation claiming the
unique quality of legislation, legalizing and prohibiting needs to be verified with a
decisive proof and it also has to be highlighted here that mere following (such
legislators) is not an evidence for firm attestation (in believing that the person can
legislate, legalise and prohibit).
Finally: there is no doubt that Abaa Baseer lives among the kuffaar, in Britain,
who call to themselves in the unique characteristic of legislation, legalizing and
prohibiting and he attests to this unique and special quality and judgment to them
in affairs of his life specifically and generally! I place between your hands the

$W7DDJKRRW+M?J

speech of Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah which nullifies this nonsense in order
to view the difference between the speech of the people of knowledge from the
luminaries and the gullible ones like this jahool (one who easily falls into
ignorance and foolishness, i.e. in this case Aboo Baseer).

$%22 %$6((5 $1' +,6 81'(567$1',1* 2) 7+(
0($1,1*2)µ$77$$*+227¶
Aboo Baseer says,
ˮήϓΎϛΕϮϏΎσϞϛϞϫΔϟ΄δϣ
˰Ϳ΍ϥϭΩϦϣΪΒόΗϲΘϟ΍ήΠθϟ΍ϭ΃ήΠΤϟ΍ϪϨϣΩ΍ήϳϻϪϧ΃Ϛηϻˬϝ΍Άδϟ΍΍άϫϞΜϣέΎΜϳΎϣΪϨϋ
βϧϹ΍ϦϴσΎϴηϪΑΩ΍ήϳΎϤϧ·ϭ˰ΕϮϏΎτϟΎΑήϔϜϟ΍Δϴπϗ΍ϮόϴϤϳϥ΃ϥϭΪϳήϳϦϤϣϞόϔϳϦϤϛ
Ϳ΍ϥϭΩϦϣΪΒόΗϲΘϟ΍ϦΠϟ΍ϭ
“The issue of: ‘is every taaghoot a disbeliever?!’ When the likes if this
question is posed there is no doubt that it does not intend stones and trees
which are worshipped besides Allaah, as those who want to water down the
issue of the kufr of the taaghoot do. Rather, the intent of it is in reference to
the Shayaateen from the humans and Jinn who are worshipped other than
Allaah.”1
I say: The meaning of “taaghoot” which Aboo Baseer denies as being what is
intended (stones and trees worshipped other than Allaah) and his restriction of the
term to mean only the Shayaateen from humans and Jinn, is a definition that I do
not know that anyone from the Imaams of the Salaf have made!? This (definition
of Aboo Baseer) is tamyee’ (watering down) of the reality of shirk of grave-
worshipping which has tested people during this era and in every era and place.
Rather, this is watering down the idols which are worshipped other than Allaah.
Imaam Muhammad ibn ’AbdulWahhaab (raheemahullaah) stated:
ΖΒΜΗϭ˭ω΍Ϯϧ΃ΔόΑέ΃ϲϔϨΗ˭ΕΎΒΛ·Ϳ΍ϻ·ˬϲϔϧϪϟ·ϻ˭ΕΎΒΛ·ϭˬϲϔϧˬͿ΍ϻ·Ϫϟ·ϻϰϨόϣ
ΏΎΑέϷ΍ϭˬΩ΍ΪϧϷ΍ϭˬΖϴϏ΍Ϯτϟ΍ϭˬΔϬϟϵ΍ϲϔϨϤϟ΍˭ω΍Ϯϧ΃ΔόΑέ΃

$W7DDJKRRW+JA

ϦϣΖϴϏ΍Ϯτϟ΍ϭˬΎϬϟ·ϩάΨΘϣΖϧ΄ϓˬήοϊϓΩϭ΃ˬήϴΧΐϠΟϦϣ˯ϲθΑϪΗΪμϗΎϣϪϟϹΎϓ
ΓΪϳΪΣϮΑ΃ϭ΃ˬΝΎΗϭ΃˭ϥΎδϤηϞΜϣˬΓΩΎΒόϠϟ΢ηήΗϭ΃ˬν΍έϮϫϭˬΪΒϋ
The meaning of ‘La ilaha il-Allaah’ is negation and affirmation. La ilaha: is negation
and ‘il-Allaah’ is: affirmation. It negates four types and four categories. The negated
categories are deities, tawaagheet, partners and lords. An ilah is that which is sought
to bring about good or avert harm and is taken as a god. The tawaagheet are:
whoever is worshipped and it please with that worship, or one who is put forward
for worship, such as Shamsaan, Taaj or Aboo Hudaydah.
The Imaam also said,
ˬβϳέΩ·ϭ˭ϥΎδϤηϞΜϣΓΩήϤϟ΍ˬΓήϔϜϟ΍ϭˬΖϴϏ΍ϮτϟΎΑϥϮΜϴϐΘδϳϢϬϧ΃Ϣψϋ΃ϭ
ϢϠϋ΃Ϳ΍ϭ˭ϢϬϟΎΜϣ΃ϭˬϒγϮϳϭ
The worst: those who seek help from the tawaagheet, disbelievers and apostates,
such as: Shamsaan, Idrees, Yoosuf and their likes, Allaah knows best.
He also said:
Many of those who claim knowledge and understanding have confused the
intended meaning of ‘La ilaha il-Allaah’ such as Ibn Kamaal and his likes from the
tawaagheet. They attest to what contradicts La ilaha il-Allaah from shirk in worship
and they believe that the shirk they are doing is a religion…
Aboo Baseer says after listing the types of tawaagheet, including ‘the ruler who
rules by other than what Allaah has revealed’:
ˬϪϨϋϪο΍ήϋ·ϭϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ϢϜΣϪΗίϭΎΠϤϟˬέϮΠϟ΍ϭϥΎϴϐτϟ΍ϲϓα΃έͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϛΎΤϟ΍
ϯήΧϷ΍ΔϴϠϫΎΠϟ΍ϊ΋΍ήηϭϢϜΤΑϪϟ΍ΪΒΘγ΍ϭ
“The ruler by other than what Allaah has revealed is at the head of tughyaan
(transgression) and oppression, due to his transgressing the rule of Allaah,
turning away from it and substituting it for other legislations of ignorance.”
Then he tries to use as a proof some verses for making takfeer of the rulers who
do not rule by what Allaah has revealed, such as the sayings of Allaah,
ͼϥ
˴ Ϯ˵Ϩϗ˶ Ϯ˵ϳ˳ϡ˸ϮϘ˴ ϟ͋Ύ˱Ϥ˸ϜΣ
˵ ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴Ϧϣ˶ ˵Ϧδ
˴ ˸Σ΃˴˸Ϧϣ˴ ϭ˴ ˴ϥϮ˵ϐ˸Βϳ˴ ˶Δϴ͉Ϡ˶ϫ˶ Ύ˴Π˸ϟ΍˴Ϣ˸ϜΤ
˵ ϓ˴ ΃˴ͽ
“Then is it the judgment of [the time of] ignorance they desire? But
who is better than Allaah in judgment for a people who are certain [in
faith].”

Then Aboo Baseer says

ˬΔϴόοϮϟ΍ϢϛΎΤϤϟ΍ΓΎπϗˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϢϬϤϜΣϡΪόϟϪΘϔλϭΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϰϤδϣϢϬϟΎϨϳϦϤϣϭ
ή΋Ύθόϟ΍ΦϳΎθϣϢϫϮΤϧϭˬΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϊ΋΍ήθΑαΎϨϟ΍ϲϓϥϮϤϜΤϳϦϳάϟ΍ΎϬϴϓϦϴϠϣΎόϟ΍ϦϴϣΎΤϤϟ΍ϭ
ΎϬϧϮϣΪϘϳϭˬΔϠσΎΒϟ΍ϢϬϔϴϟ΍Ϯγϭˬ˯΍ϮϫϷ΍ϭϑ΍ήϋϷΎΑϭˬΓΪ΋Ύδϟ΍Ε΍ΩΎόϟΎΑϥϮϤϜΤϳϦϳάϟ΍Ϟ΋ΎΒϘϟ΍ϭ
ϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ωήηϰϠϋ
“From what also justifies them to be called ‘taaghoot’ and describe them as
not ruling by what Allaah has revealed, is the issue of man-made laws and
lawyers (within such judicial systems) who judge among people with
legislations of taaghoot and the likes such as tribal elders and families who
judge by traditional customs, desires and void customs which they put
forward over the Divine Legislation of Allaah.”
The other verse Aboo Baseer tries to use is,
ͼϪ˶ Α˶ ˸΍ϭ˵ήϔ˵ ˸Ϝϳ˴ ϥ˴΃˸΍ϭ˵ήϣ˶ ΃˵˸Ϊϗ˴ ϭ˴ ˶ΕϮ˵ϏΎ͉τϟ΍ϰ˴ϟ·˶˸΍Ϯ˵Ϥϛ˴ Ύ˴ΤΘ˴ ϳ˴ ϥ˴΃˴ϥϭ˵Ϊϳ˶ήϳ˵ ͽ

“…They wish to refer legislation to taaghoot, while they were commanded
to reject it…”
{an-Nisaa (4): 60}
Then Aboo Baseer says,

Ϳ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϛΎΤϟ΍ϞϤθϳΔϳϵ΍ϲϓϩήϛΫΩέ΍Ϯϟ΍ΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϥ΃Ϛηϻϭ
“There is no doubt that the taaghoot highlighted in the verse includes the
1
one who rules by other than what Allaah has revealed.”
In regards to the first ayah: then ascribing something as being ‘jaahiliyyah’ or
describing something as having ‘jaahiliiyah’ is not a proof of kufr. Also it cannot
be ascribed as being ‘kufr’ except with an external proof which indicates kufr.
What clarifies this is the saying of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) to
Abee Dharr (radi Allaahu ’anhu): “You still have some jaahiliyyah in you” and
what the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) said in the hadeeth of Abee

)++J@EA

Maalik al-’Ash’aree (radi Allaahu ’anhu) in Saheeh Muslim: “Four things from
Jaahiliyyah will not be abandoned...” Aboo ’Ubaydah al-Qaasim bin Sallaam said:
Have you not heard Allaah’s saying,
ͼϥ
˴ Ϯ˵Ϩϗ˶ Ϯ˵ϳ˳ϡ˸ϮϘ˴ ϟ͋Ύ˱Ϥ˸ϜΣ
˵ ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴Ϧϣ˶ ˵Ϧδ
˴ ˸Σ΃˴˸Ϧϣ˴ ϭ˴ ˴ϥϮ˵ϐ˸Βϳ˴ ˶Δϴ͉Ϡ˶ϫ˶ Ύ˴Π˸ϟ΍˴Ϣ˸ϜΤ
˵ ϓ˴ ΃˴ͽ
“Then is it the judgment of [the time of] ignorance they desire?”
It’s interpretation by the commentators of the Qur’aan is that whoever rules by other
than what Allaah has revealed and follows Islaam is someone who rules by
something from the people of jaahiliyyah, because only the people of jaahiliyyah
used to judge in such ways.1
As for the second ayah then it is clearly apparent that it indicates takfeer for the
situation of ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed absolutely, because the
verse includes 2 matters:
Firstly: Their eemaan was a mere claim due to them desiring to rule by taaghoot.
Secondly: From the characteristics of the people of false eemaan is their desire to
refer judgment to taaghoot and resembling the Munafiqeen or one of their
characteristics which does necessitate kufr, such as lying.2 So based on this
whoever rules by other than what Allaah has revealed has resembled the
Munaafiqeen in one of their characteristics, yet this does not necessitate kufr
except with another proof. Ibn Jareer said,
ϪϟϮϗϦϋϥϭΪμϳϭϪϧϮϤψόϳϦϣϰϟ·ϲϨόϳΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϰϟ·ϢϬΘϣϮμΧϲϓ΍ϮϤϛΎΤΘϳϥ΃ϥϭΪϳήϳ
Ϳ΍ϢϜΣϥϭΩϦϣϪϤϜΤΑϥϮοήϳϭ
They want to refer judgment to taaghoot for their disputes, meaning to those who
they exalt and are pleased with to rule other than the rule of Allaah,
ͼϪ˶ Α˶ ˸΍ϭ˵ήϔ˵ ˸Ϝϳ˴ ϥ˴΃˸΍ϭ˵ήϣ˶ ΃˵˸Ϊϗ˴ ϭ˴ ͽ

“…while they were commanded to reject it…”
{an-Nisaa (4): 60}

&3(Q < +=.LWDDEXO(HPDDQ+@A
B-DDPL¶XO%D\DDQIHH7DIVHHULO4XU¶DDQD+M+@@

΍ϮόΒΗ΍ϭͿ΍ήϣ΃΍ϮϛήΘϓϪϴϟ·ϥϮϤϛΎΤΘϳϱάϟ΍ΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϪΑϢϫ˯ΎΟΎϤΑ΍ϮΑάϜϳϥ΃Ϣϫήϣ΃ΪϗϭϝϮϘϳ
˰ϫ΍ϥΎτϴθϟ΍ήϣ΃
So Allaah is saying that He ordered them to deny what the taaghoot came with
which is referred to for judgment, so they left Allaah’s order and followed the
command of Shaytaan.1
$%22%$6((5$1'(67$%/,6+,1*7+(3522)
Aboo Baseer states:
ϲϓϊϗϭΪϗϦϴόϤϟ΍ϙ΍Ϋϥ΃Ϧψϟ΍ϥΎΤΟέΔϟΎΣϲϓϥϮϜϳˬϦϴόϤϟ΍ήϴϔϜΗϞΒϗΔΠΤϟ΍ϡΎϴϗρ΍ήΘη΍
ϱ΃@ˬͿ΍ϪϤΣέΦϴθϟ΍ϩΪμϘϳΎϣ΍άϫϭˬϒϴϠϜΘϟ΍ϊϓήϳΰΠόϟ΍ϥϷˬϪόϓΩϦϜϤϳϻϞϬΟϦϋήϔϜϟ΍
>ΏΎϫϮϟ΍ΪΒϋϦΑΪϤΤϣ
ϻϪϧΈϓˬΎτϳήϔΗϭ΃΍ήϴμϘΗϞόϔϳϻϪϨϜϟϪόϓΩϦϜϤϳΰΠϋϭ΃ϞϬΟϦϋϩήϔϛϥΎϛ΍Ϋ·Ύϣ΃
ˬέάόϳˬϪϨϴόΑήϔϜ˵ϳϭ΍έάϋϥϮϜϳϻϭ΄τΨϟ΍έήΒϳϻ΄τΨϟ΍ϥϷˬΔΠΤϟ΍ϡΎϴϗϩήϴϔϜΘϟρήΘθϳϻϭ
ˬϪϟϰϟΎόΗϪϟϮϘϟϭ
“Making a condition for the proofs to be established before making takfeer
of a specific person, is in a state of most probable thought on whether that
specific person fell into kufr out of ignorance which cannot be defended due
to the inability to remove responsibility. This is what the Shaykh
(raheemahullaah) intended (i.e. Muhammad ibn ’AbdulWahhaab). Or if his
kufr is due to ignorance or inability then it is possible to defend him,
however if he did not do it out of neglect or excess, so such a person has no
excuse and he is made takfeer of specifically and to make takfeer of such a
person does not necessitate to establish the proof because a mistake does not
justify another mistake and is not an excuse for him,
ͼ˸ϢΘ˵ ˸ότ
˴ Θ˴ ˸γ΍Ύ˴ϣ˴ϪϠ͉ϟ΍΍Ϯ˵ϘΗ͉Ύ˴ϓͽ
“So fear Allaah as much as you are able…”
{Taghaabun (64): 16}
Such a person is able to avert kufr from himself but he did not do anything
to avert it. So if the matter is like this for one who is in this state then

)++@?

primarily he is not excused and there does not have to be the condition of
establishing the proof for making takfeer of such a person. Wherever the
Divine Legislation proof has revealed correctly has ignorance removed from
him in regards to the kufr which he fell into.
I also say: Because the Murji’ah of the era make establishing the proof the
sum objection before takfeer can be made specifically, even if the one being
made takfeer of is more transgressive than Iblees and more knowledgeable
than him!”1
I say: This speech is baatil and based on ignorance of establishing the proofs, it is
speech devoid of daleel. What indicates what I say is the lack of any statements
for the people of knowledge justifying these false conditions (of Aboo Baseer) and
it is apparent that the man (Aboo Baseer) does not differentiate between the
regulations of the worldly life and the regulations for the Hereafter.
I do not know where this man got the condition of ‘strongest opinion’ and
‘the most probable thoughts’ from?? From the authentic Sunnah is that which
opposes this in the story of Usaamah bin Zayd (radi Allaahu ’anhu) when he
killed the man who said ‘La ilaha il-Allaah.’ The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi
wassallam) rebuked Usaamah for what he did even though the strongest opinion
was that the man said the Shahaadah out of seeking refuge and out of fear of the
sword. The origin of the man was kufr and it is thought that he did not really
intend eemaan, and rather wanted to be saved from being killed. Yet, the Prophet
(sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) judged the man to have Islaam. So if you (O Abaa
Baseer!) view that a man has accepted Islaam by stating the kalima ‘La ilaha il-
Allaah’ it renders your principle void and rejected. If you view anything other than
this then you have opposed the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam), so
choose for yourself one of the two! This is the first matter.
Secondly, the inability of a matter is relational and differs from circumstance
to circumstance and from place to place, it is not possible to base Divinely
Legislated regulations upon this, especially in the field of such delicate maters of
expelling people from the fold of Islaam into kufr. There has to be an explanatory
understanding of the realities of the matter, this issue is not as easy as you imagine

$W7DDJKRRW+J
+

(O Abaa Baseer!) with your corrupted imagination and void conditions.1 For this
reason, the Divine Legislation controlled such void conditions by establishing the
proofs, after verifying the conditions and the removal of the preventative factors,
this is in regards to regulations in the Dunya. As for the Hereafter then only Allaah
has knowledge of it. If you had received knowledge from the people who are
specialized in it and you followed their statements in explaining the meaning of
establishing the hujjah, how could you have taken these dangerous risks? Ibn
Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah) said:
Ϫϧ΄ΑϢϬϴϠϋϢϜΤϳΚΤΑ˰ϢϬϟΎΜϣ΃ϭϝΎϬΠϟ΍˯ϻΆϫϦϣϦϴόϤϟ΍ήϴϔϜΘϓ΍άϫϑήϋ΍Ϋ·ϭ
ϲΘϟ΍ΔϴϟΎγήϟ΍ΔΠΤϟ΍ϢϫΪΣ΃ϰϠϋϡϮϘΗϥ΃ΪόΑϻ·ϪϴϠϋϡΎϴϘϟ΍ίϮΠϳϻ˰έΎϔϜϟ΍Ϧϣ
ήϔϛΎϬϧ΃ΐϳέϻΔϟΎϘϤϟ΍ϩάϫΖϧΎϛϥ·ϭˬϝϮγήϠϟϥϮϔϟΎΨϣϢϬϧ΃ΎϬΑϦϴϴΒΘϳ
If this is known, then to make specific takfeer, as done by those juhaal and
their likes wherein they judge people to be kuffaar, is not permissible except
after the Prophetic proofs have been established which clarify to them that
they have indeed opposed the Messenger, if there is no doubt that the saying
is kufr.2
He then stated:
Ϧϋ˱ΎϴϬϧαΎϨϟ΍Ϣψϋ΃Ϧϣϲϧ΃ϲϨϣϚϟΫϢϠόϳϲϨδϟΎΟϦϣϭ˱ΎϤ΋΍Ωϲϧ΃ϊϣ΍άϫ
ΔΠΤϟ΍ϪϴϠϋΖϣΎϗΪϗϪϧ΃ϢϠϋ΍Ϋ·ϻ·ˬΔϴμόϣϭϖϴδϔΗϭήϴϔϜΗϰϟ·ϦϴόϣΐδϨϳ
ήϗ΃ϲϧ·ϭˬϯήΧ΃˱ΎϴλΎϋϭˬϯήΧ΃˱ΎϘγΎϓϭˬΓέΎΗ˱΍ήϓΎϛϥΎϛΎϬϔϟΎΧϦϣϲΘϟ΍ΔϴϟΎγήϟ΍
ΔϴϟϮϘϟ΍ΔϳήΒΨϟ΍Ϟ΋ΎδϤϟ΍ϲϓ΄τΨϟ΍ϢόϳϚϟΫϭˬΎϫ΄τΧΔϣϷ΍ϩάϬϟήϔϏΪϗͿ΍ϥ΃
ΔϴϤϠόϟ΍Ϟ΋ΎδϤϟ΍ϭ
I am of those who forbid ascribing takfeer, tasfeeq and disobedience to a
specific person until it is known that the Prophetic proof has been

?

'
1A D '

KXMMDK ' ' D '
(
' D !.) QT
B? (³+RZFDQRQH
KDYHWKHH[FXVHRILJQRUDQFHZKHQKHLVDEOHWRJRDQGOHDUQ´ # WDNIHHU

'C+% *
B0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+B+MAA

established on the person. Such a proof is of the level which if a person were
to deny would be a disbeliever, or a faasiq (sinner) or disobedient at other
times. I affirm that Allaah has forgiven the mistakes of this Ummah and this
covers both matters of reports of sayings and knowledge-related issues.1
Ibn ul-Qayyim (raheemahullaah) stated:
ΖϣΎϗϦϣϻ·ΏάόϳϻϭˬϪϟΪϋϭϪϤϜΤΑΔϣΎϴϘϟ΍ϡϮϳϩΩΎΒϋϦϴΑϲπϘϳͿ΍ϭ
ϭήϤϋϭϪϨϴόΑΪϳίϥϮϛΎϣ΃ϭˬϖϠΨϟ΍ΔϠϤΟϲϓϪΑωϮτϘϣ΍άϬϓˬϞγήϟΎΑϪΘΠΣϪϴϠϋ
ϩΩΎΒϋϦϴΑϭͿ΍ϦϴΑϝϮΧΪϟ΍ϦϜϤϳϻΎϤϣϚϟάϓˬϻϡ΃ΔΠΤϟ΍ϪϴϠϋΖϣΎϗ
And Allaah will judge between His servants on the Day of Judgment by His
Judgment and Justice and no one will be punished except those who have
2
had the proofs established on them by the Messengers.
This speech of Shaykh Muhammad bin ’AbdulWahhab (raheemahullaah) testifies

to this and the statement of the Imaams of the Salaf before and after him about a
Muslim who has the proofs established on him but the preventions were not
applied, so they make the condition of establishing the proofs in making takfeer of
a person. It is understood from the speech of the Shaykh that he makes absolute
3
specific takfeer and this is a false invention and lie upon the Shaykh.

)+D+0+BB@
B7DUHHTDO+LMUDW\DQ+1B1
0 ?

'
MA D
' G
'
) &; '(
' '#
&;D ( +% *

27+(5 (55256 ,1 7+( ,668( 2) 58/,1* %< 27+(5

7+$1:+$7$//$$++$65(9($/('
Aboo Baseer states under the title ‘the statement about one who rules according to
other than what Allaah has revealed’:
ˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϳϱάϟ΍ϢϛΎΤϟ΍ϥΎϴϐσϦϋ˰ΎϨΜΤΑϲϓ˰ϢϠϜΘϧΫ·ϦΤϧ
ϲϓ˰ϪΘϗΎσέΪϗ˰ϪϘϴΒτΗϰϟ·ϰόδϳϭˬ˱ϼϳΪΑϪϨϋϰοήϳϻϭˬϪϴϓωήθϟ΍ϢϜΣϦϋϭ
ήϴϐΑΎϬϴϓϢϜΤϴϓˬϪδϔϧϪϧϮΨΗ˰ϊ΋ΎϗϭϞϗϭ˰Δόϗ΍ϭϲϓϪϨϜϟˬΓΎϴΤϟ΍ΕϻΎΠϣϊϴϤΟ
ΎϤϛˬϢΛϹΎΑϩέϮόηϭήϴμϘΘϟΎΑϪϓ΍ήΘϋ΍ϊϣˬϯϮϫϭ΃ϪδϔϧϲϓϒόπϟͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃Ύϣ
Ϧϳάϟ΍ϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ϡΎϜΣϦϣϢϫήϴϏϭˬϦϴϴγΎΒόϟ΍ϭΔϴϣ΃ϲϨΑϡΎϜΣϦϣήϴΜϛϝΎΣϮϫ
ϢϫΪόΑϦϣ΍ϭ΅ΎΟ
Ϧϣ˱΍ΪΣ΃ϑήόϧϻϭˬϢϬϣϼγΈΑϻ·ϝϮϘϧϻ˰ϢϬΗέϮλϰϠϋϥΎϛϦϣϭ˰˯ϻΆϬϓ
αΎΒϋϦΑ΍ΔϟϮϘϣϞϤΤϣϢϬϟΎΜϣ΃ϰϠϋϭϢϬϴϠϋϭˬϢϫήϔϜΑϝΎϗϦϳήΒΘόϤϟ΍ϢϠόϟ΍Ϟϫ΃
ϞϘϨϳϱάϟ΍ήϔϜϟΎΑβϴϟϭˬήϔϛϥϭΩήϔϛϪϧ·ϢϠόϟ΍Ϟϫ΃ϦϣϩήϴϏϭϪϨϋͿ΍ϲοέ
έΎϔϜϟ΍ϝΎόϓ΃ϲϫΎπϳ˱ϼόϓ΍ϮϠόϓϢϬϧ΃ϭˬΔϠϤϟ΍Ϧϋ
ΪϳήϧΎϤϧ·ϭˬΪϴόΑϦϣίάϨϣϭΔΣΎδϟ΍ϦϋΔΒ΋ΎϏϪΒθϟ΍ΓέϮμϟ΍ϩάϫΪϳήϧϻϦΤϨϓ
˰ϫ΍ϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍έΎμϣ΃ϦϣήϴΜϛϲϓΓΪ΋Ύδϟ΍ΓέϮμϟ΍ϚϠΗΪϳήϧˬϯήΧ΃ΔϟΎΣ
“If in our study we speak about the oppression of the leader who rules by
other than what Allaah has revealed, and about the rule of the other than
what Allaah has revealed, and about the rule of the Divine Legislation. Such a
leader is not pleased with it as a substitute, and tries to implement the Divine
Legislation as he is able in all aspects of life, however he, in a circumstance,
or some circumstances, is overtaken by his desire and he rules by other than
what Allaah has revealed out of a weakness in himself or out of desire. Such
a leader admits his shortcomings and sinful feelings, like the situation of
most of the rulers of Bani ’Umayyah and the Abbasids and other Muslim
rulers who came after them. Whoever is like this, we say nothing except that
they are upon Islaam and we do not know anyone from the people of
knowledge who made takfeer of this category of people. The statement of
Ibn ’Abbaas (radi Allaahu ’anhu) is to be applied to them, that this is kufr

less than kufr and not the kufr which expels one from the religion, they
have done an action of the kuffaar. We do not intend this absent type (of
ruler) which was found a long time ago, we rather intend another type
(ruler), which is found in most of the Muslim countries today.”1
I say:
Firstly, restricting the issue of ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed to the
situation of a person, or circumstances, is one of the distortions and errors of the
takfeerees. If not, then what is the daleel for this restriction? The basis of this issue
is that it is general for all regulations of the Divine Legislation and not only
restricted, as Allaah says

“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is
those who are disbelievers.”
Meaning: even in one issue that he rejected or declared lawful, then he is a

disbeliever who has committed major kufr. As for the one who rules by his desires
then he is a disbeliever who has committed minor kufr, there is no difference
between ruling in one issue, or ten issues or a hundred issues or a thousand issues
or more! As long as a person still considers himself as having erred. This is the
understanding of the Salaf of the ayah and is what the ’Ulama follow from the
time of Ibn ’Abbaas and his students: Taawoos, Zayn ul-’Aabideen and ’Ataa’. So I
do not know where this man (Aboo Baseer) got this restriction from and where
the daleel is for this claim?? The reality is that there is no daleel except mere ideas
and desires. The noble Shaykh ’AbdulMuhsin al-’Abbaad was asked:
ϰϟ·ΝΎΘΤϳϡ΃ˮϪΗ΍ΫϲϓήϔϛΔϴόοϮϟ΍Ϧϴϧ΍ϮϘϟΎΑΔϴϣϼγϹ΍Δόϳήθϟ΍ϝ΍ΪΒΘγ΍Ϟϫ
ˮϚϟΫί΍ϮΠΑΩΎϘΘϋϻ΍ϭϲΒϠϘϟ΍ϝϼΤΘγϻ΍

$W7DDJKRRWS

ϊϣ˱ΎϣΎϋ˱ΎόϳήθΗϦϴϧ΍ϮϘϟ΍ϞόΟϭˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑΓήϣϢϜΤϟ΍ϲϓϕήϓϙΎϨϫϞϫϭ
ˮϚϟΫί΍ϮΟϡΪϋΩΎϘΘϋ΍
Is substituting the Sharee’ah with man-made laws kufr in itself or does it
have to be with istihlaal of the heart and belief in its permissibility? Is there
a difference between ruling one time by other than what Allaah has revealed
and making it a general law of legislation along with believing in its
impermissibility?
Answer:
˰ήΜϛ΃ϭ΃Ϟϗ΃ϭ΃ϒϟ΃ϭ΃ˬΔΌϣϭ΃ˬΓήθϋϭ΃ˬΔϟ΄δϣϲϓϢϜΤϟ΍ϦϴΑϕήϓϻϪϧ΃ϭΪΒϳ
ϞόϓϪϧ΃ϭˬ˱΍ήϜϨϣι΍ήϣ΃ϞόϓϪϧ΃ϭˬ˯ϲτΨϣϪϧ΃ϪδϔϧήΒΘόϳϥΎδϧϹ΍ϡ΍ΩΎϣ˭ϕήϓϻ
ήϔϛϥϭΩήϔϛ΍άϬϓˬΐϧάϟ΍Ϧϣϒ΋ΎΧϪϧ΃ϭˬΔϴμόϣ
ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϟ΍ΎϬϴϓϞΤΘδϳˬΓΪΣ΍ϭΔϟ΄δϣϲϓϥΎϛϮϟϭ˰ϝϼΤΘγϻ΍ϊϣΎϣ΃ϭ
΍˱ήϔϛήϔϜϳϪϧΈϓ˭˰˱ϻϼΣϪδϔϧήΒΘόϳˬͿ΍
Firstly, there is no difference between ruling in one issue on ten, a hundred,

a thousand or anymore or any less – there is no difference at all! As long as a
person still considers himself as being mistaken and as having committed an
act of disobedient and if he fears sin. This is kufr less than kufr.1
Secondly, it is not permissible to restrict the verse to a group and not another
except with a proof from the Book or Sunnah.
Thirdly, there is unto you a clear and sufficient explanation form the Faqeeh and
Usoolee Muhammad bin Saalih al-’Uthaymeen (raheemahullaah) in this issue and
then compare it with the claims of the people of ideologies and desires.2

8 6KDUK6XQDQ$EHH'DDZRRG ,?"&Q&1BA-BA8 (BAAA46
B8 ' D

+% *


+,6 86( 2) 7+( 67$7(0(176 2) 7+( 3(23/( 2)
.12:/('*(72'(&,(9(7+(3(23/(
Also Aboo Baseer tries to use the statements of Ahl ul-’Ilm as proofs (for his
arguments) such as: Ibn Katheer, Ibn Taymiyyah, Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem Aal
ush-Shaykh, ash-Shinqeetee, ’Abdul’Azeez bin Baaz and others. I mentioned to
you before that trying to use their statements as proofs via deception is of no avail
to them or their takfeeree opinions, and do not forget their distortion, cutting and
pasting pf the statements of the scholars and understanding them incorrectly all in
order to agree with their own views. Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah stated:
ˬΎϬπϐΒϳϭϪϔϟΎΨΗϲΘϟ΍ιϮμϨϟ΍ϥΎϤΘϛϲΤϳϮϫϭϻ·˱ΎϋΪΘΒϣςϗΪΠΗϼϓ
ϒϠδϟ΍ϝΎϗΎϤϛˬϚϟΫϞόϔϳϦϣξϐΒϳϭˬΎϬΑΙΪΤΘϟ΍ϭΎϬΘϳ΍ϭέϭΎϫέΎϬο·ξϐΒϳϭ
ϪΒϠϗϦϣΚϳΪΤϟ΍ΓϭϼΣΖϋΰϧϻ·ΔϋΪΑΪΣ΃ωΪΘΑ΍Ύϣ
You will not find an innovator except that he hides the texts which oppose
him and he will hate those texts. He will also hate bring these texts up,
narrating them, mentioning them and he hates acting by them. Just as the
Salaf said: “One does not begin an innovation except that the sweetness of hadeeth is
removed from his heart.”1
As what Ibn Katheer stated towards the end of his speech then he stated:
ήϓΎϛϮϬϓ>ϢϬϨϣ@ϚϟΫϞόϓϦϤϓ
“Whoever from them2 does that is a disbeliever”.
This means that he was intending the Mongols and those like them who
committed juhood and istihlaal and fell into the Nawaaqid of al-Islaam. Then Ibn
Katheer stated,
Ύ˱όΒΘϣ˱ΎϋήηϪϴϨΑϲϓΕέΎμϓ
“It became among his offspring a legislation that was followed”.

0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+BA+?
B' D '³IURPWKHPPLQKXP´ # (
WDGOHHV G DW7DDJKRRW+E1

This is proof that they made such laws of jaahiliyyah to be lawful and they made
it as a deen that came from Allaah, the proof for this is that they said that Genghis
Khaan was the son of Allaah. Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah mentioned the
following about the state of the Mongols and their beliefs:
• We witnessed the military people and we saw that the majority of them did
not pray and we neither saw among their soldiers any who called the
adhaan nor an Imaam. They took the wealth of the Muslims and and
destroyed their houses to an extent to which only Allaah knows.
• There is not to be found within their state except those who are the worst
of creation. Either you’ll find a hypocritical heretic who does not believe in
the deen of Islaam inwardly at all or you’ll find a person who is worse than
the people of innovation, such as the Rawaafid, Jahmiyyah, Ittihadiyyah
and their likes; or you’ll find the most immoral and sinful people. These
types of people are found within their land which they are established in
and they do not perform hajj to the House of Allaah.
• They fight for Genghis Khaan and whoever joins them and makes
allegiance to them has to have Genghis Khaan as a walee for them, even if
the person is a disbeliever. Whoever rejects this they hold as an enemy,
even if he is the best of Muslims.
• The greatest of them who first came to Shaam in order to get nearness to
the Muslims said that “the two great signs of Allaah are Muhammad and
Genghis Khaan.”
• Therefore, their creed in Genghis Khaan was very important to them and
they believed that he was the son of Allaah in the same way the Christians
believe that ’Eesaa (alayhis-salaam) the Messiah is.
• So with this, they hold Genghis Khaan as one of the greatest Messengers of
Allaah and to the extent that they say when they gain wealth “this is the
provision from Genghis Khaan” and they thank him for their food and
drink, and they make lawful killing whoever opposes whatever Genghis
Khaan, the accursed disbelieving enemy of Allaah, His Messenger and His
believing servants.

• The Mongols wanted to put the accursed Genghis Khaan at the same level
as the Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) and it is well
known that even Musaylimah al-Kadhdhab was of less harm to the Muslims
than Genghis Khan! As Musaylimah claimed to share Prophethood and the
Message with Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) and for this
reason the Companions (radi Allaahu ’anhum) made it lawful to fight him
and his apostate followers. So what about the one who manifests Islaam
and then put Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) on the same level
as Genghis Khan!?
• As a result, their notables and senior ministers made the deen of Islaam the
same as the deen of the Yahood and Nasaara and that all of these are paths
to Allaah like the four madhdhabs with the Muslims. Some of them also
prefer Judaism or Christianity and some prefer Islaam.
I say: If you know, you will immediately see the ignorance of the one who
considers the rule of Yaasiq to be better than man-made laws, Aboo Baseer
however stated:
Then contemplate, is there a difference between Yaasiq of Genghis Khan and the
effective man-made laws in Muslim lands today and it is possible that Yaasiq from
one angle is better because it includes some aspects of Islaam, as opposed to the
man-made laws which are found in the West and the desires of men.
I ask Abaa Baseer: under which system of law did you marry when you
where in your Muslim country before you lived in the lands of kufr? What are the
marriage and divorce laws of the people and with which law do people inherit
and bequeath? What do you say about the ministries and organizations which give
concern to religious affairs, da’wah and issuing religious rulings, and the religious
and academic foundations which focus on teaching the sciences of the Sharee’ah?
What has preceded is injustice and transgression and indeed misguidance to
compare the condition of the Mongols with the situation of the Muslims today. Al-
Haafidh Ibn Katheer stated also in his tafseer, vol.2, p.61 of Allaah’s saying,

“And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed – then it is those

They denied the rule of Allaah intentionally and on purpose and Allaah said here,
ͼϥ
˴ Ϯ˵Ϥϟ˶Ύ͉ψϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵Ϫ˷Ϡϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ
“And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed then it is those
who are the wrongdoers.”
Because they did not treat rule justly between the oppressed and the oppressor in
matters wherein Allaah instructed justice and equality between all, the opposed,
oppressed and transgressed.
As for trying to use Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah) as a proof,
then it has been shown that he makes the condition of istihlaal. As for what Aboo
Baseer transmitted from Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem Aal ush-Shaykh then
Shaykh ’AbdurRahmaan bin Mu’alaa al-Luwayhiq in his book Mushkilah al-Ghuloo
fi’d-Deen, vol.3, p.883 clarifies the correct understanding of the six categories
which Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem mentioned in his treatise Tahkeem ul-
Qawaaneen. The opinion of Shaykh Muhammad ibn ’AbdulWahhaab
(raheemahullaah) is the opinion of the illustrious Imaams before him such as
Imaam Ibn ul-Qayyim, who said,
ϥ·ϪϧΈϓ˭ϢϛΎΤϟ΍ϝΎΣΐδΤΑήΒϛϷ΍ϭήϐλϷ΍ϦϳήϔϜϟ΍ϝϭΎϨΘϳͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϥ·
ΔΑϮϘόϠϟϖΤΘδϣϪϧ΄ΑϪϓ΍ήΘϋ΍ϊϣ˱ΎϧΎϴμϋϪϨϋϝΪϋϭΔόϗ΍Ϯϟ΍ϩάϫϲϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϢϜΤϟ΍ΏϮΟϭΪϘΘϋ΍
ήϐλ΃ήϔϛ΍άϬϓ
ϪϠϬΟϥ·ϭˬήΒϛ΃ήϔϛ΍άϬϓͿ΍ϢϜΣϪϧ΃ϪϨ˷ϘϴΗϊϣϪϴϓή˷ϴΨϣϪϧ΃ϭΐΟ΍ϭήϴϏϪϧ΃ΪϘΘϋ΍ϥ·ϭ
ϦϴΌτΨϤϟ΍ϢϜΣϪϟΊτΨϣ΍άϬϓϩ΄τΧ΃ϭ
Ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed leads to two types of kufr:
minor and major depending on the condition of the ruler. If he believes in
the obligation of ruling by what Allaah has revealed yet does not do it out of
disobedience to Allaah, while admitting that he is eligible for punishment,
this is minor kufr. If he believes that it is not an obligation to rule by what
Allaah has revealed and that he has an option in regards to it while knowing

that it is major kufr but out of ignorance and error, then this is one who is
mistaken and has the ruling of those who err.1
With this detailed explanation from Ibn ul-Qayyim (raheemahullaah) in this issue
we understand how Shaykh Muhammad Ameen ash-Shinqeetee (raheemahullaah)
also agreed with the ’aqeedah of the Salaf in this issue. His efforts were clarified
in a study of the ’aqeedah of the Salaf and traversing their manhaj and following
their way.2
Aboo Baseer tries to use as a proof the speech of Imaam Bin Baaz
(raheemahullaah) about the one who rules by other than what Allaah has
revealed and claims that the Imaam considered the mere leaving of ruling by what
Allaah has revealed as indicating the absolute removal of eemaan in the one who
does it. Shaykh Bin Baaz however was asked in Majmoo’ al-Fataawaa Ibn Baaz:
Are the rulers who rule by other than what Allaah has revealed considered
kuffaar? If we say that they are Muslims what do we say about Allaah’s
saying,
ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ΃˴Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

“And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed – then it is those
Answer:
ϢϜΣϦϤϓˬϢϬϟΎϤϋ΃ϭϢϫΩΎϘΘϋ΍ΐδΤΑϢϬϣΎϜΣ΃ϒϠΘΨΗˬϡΎδϗ΃Ϳ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϡΎϜΤϟ΍
ϢϜΤϳϦϣ΍άϜϫϭˬϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ϊϴϤΟΪϨϋήϓΎϛϮϬϓͿ΍ωήηϦϣϦδΣ΃ϚϟΫϥ΃ϯήϳͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑ
ϮϬϓˬϞπϓ΃Δόϳήθϟ΍ϢϴϜΤΗϥ·ϝΎϗϮϟϭˬΰ΋ΎΟϚϟΫϥ΃ϯήϳϭͿ΍ωήηϦϣ˱ϻΪΑΔόϴοϮϟ΍Ϧϴϧ΍ϮϘϟ΍
Ϳ΍ϡήΣΎϣϞΤΘγ΍ϪϧϮϜϟˬήϓΎϛ
ˬϪϴϠϋϡϮϜΤϤϟ΍ϦϴΑϭϪϨϴΑΓϭ΍Ϊόϟϭ΃ΓϮηήϟϭ΃ϯϮϬϠϟ˱ΎϋΎΒΗ΍ˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΣϦϣΎϣ΃
ϦϣήΒΘόϳ΍άϬϓˬͿ΍ωήηϢϴϜΤΗϪϴϠϋΐΟ΍Ϯϟ΍ϥ΃ϭˬϚϟάΑͿιΎϋϪϧ΃ϢϠόϳϮϫϭˬϯήΧ΃ΏΎΒγϷϭ΃
΍άϫ˯ΎΟΎϤϛˬήϐλ΃˱ΎϘδϓϭήϐλ΃˱Ύ˱ϤϠχϭήϐλ΃˱΍ήϔϛϰΗ΃ΪϗήΒΘόϳϭˬή΋ΎΒϜϟ΍ϭϲλΎόϤϟ΍Ϟϫ΃

0DGDDULMXV6DDOLNHHQD++00?00J
B-XKRRG6KD\NK0XKDPPDG$PHHQDVK6KDQTHHWHHIHH7DTUHHU¶$THHGDWLV6DODI+EBE0

Ϯϫϭˬ΢ϟΎμϟ΍ϒϠδϟ΍ϦϣΔϋΎϤΟϭαϭϭΎσϦϋϭ˰ΎϤϬϨϋͿ΍ϲοέ˰αΎΒϋϦΑ΍ϦϋϰϨόϤϟ΍
ϖϴϓϮΘϟ΍ϲϟϭͿ΍ϭˬϢϠόϟ΍Ϟϫ΃ΪϨϋϑϭήόϤϟ΍
Those who rule by other than what Allaah has revealed are of different
categories and their rulings differ depending on their beliefs and actions.
Whoever rules by other than what Allaah has revealed and views that it is
better than the Divine Legislation of Allaah is a disbeliever according to most
of the Muslims. Likewise, the one who rules by man-made laws is a substitute
to the Divine Legislation of Allaah and views that as being permissible and
even is he says “The rule of the Divine Legislation is better” he is still a
disbeliever as he has made what Allaah has prohibited to be halaal.
As for the one who rules by what Allaah has revealed due to following his
desires or due to bribery or enmity between him and the ruled, or due to any
other reason yet he knows that he is disobeying Allaah by doing that and
knows that it is obligatory to rule by the Divine Legislation of Allaah, then
such a person is considered to be from those who have fallen into
disobedience and major sin. He is considered to have committed minor kufr,
minor dhulm and minor fisq, as has reached us in the meaning of Ibn
’Abbaas (raheemahullaah) and from Taawoos and a group of the Salaf us-
Saalih and this is well known with the people of knowledge and with Allaah
is success.
The Shaykh was also asked:
ϻϞϫΎδΘϟ΍ϚϟΫϥ΃ΪϘΘόϳξόΒϟ΍ϭͿ΍ΔόϳήηήϴϐΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϲϓϥϮϠϫΎδΘϳϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ϦϣήϴΜϛ
ΎϤΑϲϟΎΒϳϻϭͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϞΤΘδϳήΧϵ΍ξόΒϟ΍ϭϡϼγϹΎΑϪϜδϤΗϲϓήΛΆϳ
ˮϚϟΫϲϓϖΤϟ΍ΎϤϓˬϚϟΫϰϠϋΐΗήΘϳ
Many of the Muslims are lax with regards to ruling by other than the
Sharee’ah of Allaah and some believe that this laxity does not affect in
holding onto Islaam and some others legalise ruling by other than what
Allaah has revealed. What is the truth in this issue?
Answer:
ΎϤΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϪϴϠϋΐΠϳϪϧ΃ϢϠόϳϮϫϭͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΣϦϣϝΎϘϳϥ΃ϮϫϭϞϴμϔΗϪϴϓ΍άϫ
ϥ΃ϪϟίϮΠϳϪϧ΃ϭϚϟΫϲϓϪϴϠϋΝήΣϻϪϧ΃ϯ΃έϭήϣϷ΍΍άϫΡΎΒΘγ΍ϦϜϟϭωήθϟ΍ϒϟΎΧϪϧ΃ϭͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃

ΎϬόοϭϲΘϟ΍ΔϴόοϮϟ΍Ϧϴϧ΍ϮϘϟΎΑϢϜΤϟΎϛˬ˯ΎϤϠόϟ΍ϊϴϤΟΪϨϋήΒϛ΃˱΍ήϔϛήϓΎϛϮϬϓͿ΍ΔόϳήηήϴϐΑϢϜΤϳ
ϢϜΣϦϣϞπϓ΃ΎϬϧ΃Ϣϋίϭ΃ˬΎϬΑϢϜΤϟ΍ίϮΠϳϪϧ΃ϢϋίϦϤϣϢϫήϴϏϭ΃ΩϮϬϴϟ΍ϭ΃ϯέΎμϨϟ΍ϦϣϝΎΟήϟ΍
ϢϜΣ˯Ύηϥ·ϭΔϨδϟ΍ϭϥ΁ήϘϟΎΑϢϜΣ˯Ύηϥ·ήϴΨϣϥΎδϧϹ΍ϥ΃ϭͿ΍ϢϜΣϱϭΎδΗΎϬϧ΃Ϣϋίϭ΃ˬͿ΍
ϡΪϘΗΎϤϛ˯ΎϤϠόϟ΍ωΎϤΟΈΑήϔϛ΍άϫΪϘΘϋ΍ϦϣˬΔϴόοϮϟ΍Ϧϴϧ΍ϮϘϟΎΑ
Ϫϧ΃ϭϪϟϮγήϟϭͿιΎϋϪϧ΃ϢϠόϳϮϫϭϞΟΎϋφΤϟϭ΃ϯϮϬϟͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΣϦϣΎϣ΃
ϰΗ΃ΪϗϪϨϜϟήΒϛϷ΍ήϔϜϟ΍ϚϟάΑήϔϜϳϻϪϧΈϓͿ΍ωήθΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϪϴϠϋΐΟ΍Ϯϟ΍ϥ΃ϭ˱ΎϤϴψϋ˱΍ήϜϨϣϞόϓ
ˬϢϠόϟ΍Ϟϫ΃ϦϣΎϤϫήϴϏϭΪϫΎΠϣϭαΎΒϋϦΑ΍ϚϟΫϝΎϗΎϤϛˬήϐλ΃˱΍ήϔϛϭΓήϴΒϛΔϴμόϣϭ˱ΎϤϴψϋ˱΍ήϜϨϣ
ϝϮϗ΍άϫϭˬήΒϛϷ΍ήϔϜϟ΍ϮϫβϴϟϭˬϖδϓϥϭΩ˱ΎϘδϓϭˬϢϠχϥϭΩ˱ΎϤϠχϭήϔϛϥϭΩ˱΍ήϔϛϚϟάΑΐϜΗέ΍Ϊϗϭ
ΔϋΎϤΠϟ΍ϭΔϨδϟ΍Ϟϫ΃
This needs some explanation and it can be said: whoever rules by other than
what Allaah has revealed while knowing that is it obligatory to rule by what
Allaah has revealed and he opposes the Sharee’ah however he permits it and
views that there is no problem in that and that it is permissible to rule by
other than the Sharee’ah of Allaah. Such a person is a disbeliever who has
committed major kufr according to most of the scholars. This is like ruling
by man-made laws which have been put in place by Christian, Jewish and
other (non-Muslim) men who claim that it is permissible to rule by such
laws. Or a person claims that it is better than the rule of Allaah, or claims
that it is the same as the rule of Allaah and that people have a choice to
either rule by the Qur’aan and Sunnah if he wishes, or rule by man-made
laws if he wishes - the whoever believes in this way has disbelieved
according to the consensus of the scholars as has preceded. As for the one
who rules by other than what Allaah has revealed out of desire or and
emergency and knows that he is disobedient to Allaah and His Messenger
and that doing it (ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed) is a major
evil, and believes that it is obligatory to rule by the Sharee’ah of Allaah, then
such a person is not made takfeer of for committing major kufr but he has
done a major evil sin and committed minor kufr about which Ibn ’Abbaas
spoke of along with Mujaahid and others form the people of knowledge.
Such a person has committed kufr less than kufr, dhulm less than dhulm
and fisq less than fisq and not major kufr – this is what Ahl us-Sunnah wa’l-
Jama’ah say.

So where are you from the likes of these fataawaa and others O Abaa Baseer?!
You did not mention these for your beloved readers? Or are you merely following
that which is unspecific seeking discord and seeking its interpretation? We seek
refuge in Allaah from such detriments. Where are you in comparison to the saying
of the Shaykh when he was asked about changing laws and if the one who does it
is considered a disbeliever who is expelled from the religion? Imaam Bin Baaz
(raheemahullaah) answered to a question that was put to him by saying:
Ϧϣϭ΃ˬΓϮηέϞΟ΃ϦϣˬΔλΎΧΏΎΒγϷϚϟΫϞόϓ΍Ϋ·Ύϣ΃ˬήΒϛ΃˱΍ήϔϛ˱΍ήϓΎϛήΒΘόϳΎϬΣΎΒΘγ΍΍Ϋ·
˱΍ήϔϛϥϮϜϳ˱ΎΤϴΒΘδϣΎϬϠόϓ΍Ϋ·Ύϣ΃ˬήϔϛϥϭΩ˱΍ήϔϛήϔϜϳϪϧΈϓΔϣήΤϣΎϬϧ΃ϢϠόϳϭˬιΎΨη΃˯Ύοέ·ϞΟ΃
΍˱ήϓΎϛϥϮϜϳϪϧΈϓΔόϳήθϟ΍ήϴϐΑϥϮϧΎϘΑϢϜΤϟ΍ϞΤΘγ΍΍Ϋ·ϱ΃ˬήΒϛ΃
ϪΒη΃ΎϣϭˬαΎϨϟ΍ξόΑ˯Ύοέ·ϞΟ΃Ϧϣϭ΃ˬΓϭ΍Ϊόϟ΍ϭ΃ˬΓϮηήϟ΍ϞΜϣΏΎΒγϷΎϬϠόϓ΍Ϋ·Ύϣ΃
ˬϞϳΪΒΘϟ΍ήϴϏϭϞϳΪΒΘϟ΍˯΍ϮγϭˬέϮμϟ΍ϊϴϤΟϞϤθϳϢϜΤϟ΍΍άϫϭˬήϔϛϥϭΩ˱΍ήϔϛϥϮϜϳϚϟΫϥΈϓˬϚϟΫ
Ϳ΍ωήθΑϢϜΤϳϥ΃ϭϚϟΫϊϨϤϳϥ΃ήϣϷ΍ϲϟϭϰϠϋΐΠϳϭ
If he permitted it then he is considered a disbeliever who has committed

major kufr, as for if he does it for a particular reason, or due to following his
desire or due to bribes, or to please people yet knows that it is haraam then
he has disbelieved and committed kufr less than kufr, meaning if he makes it
lawful to rule by a law other than what Allaah has revealed – such a person
is a disbeliever. As for if he does it due to reasons such as bribery, enmity or
to please some people and the likes, then such a person has fallen into kufr
less than kufr and this ruling includes all facets whether it be tabdeel
(substituting) or not and those in authority have to prevent themselves from
that and they must rule by the Divine Legislation of Allaah.
This is also the same explanation of the Muhaddith of the era Muhammad
Naasiruddeen al-Albaanee (raheemahullaah), as for those who accuse him with
no shame of having Irjaa’ then this is nothing but a false claim. Imaam Bin Baaz
agreed with Imaam Muhammad Naasiruddeen al-Albaanee as is found in his notes
to the words of Imaam al-Albaanee as was distributed in the Saudi magazine ad-
Da’wah, no.1511, Jumadaa al-Awwal, 1416 AH. Imaam Muhammad bin Saalih al-
’Uthaymeen, the scholar of Usool, also affirmed the statements of the two noble
scholars in one of his lessons, it is as follows:

The kufr is for the one who makes it halaal, as for the one who rules by it (other
than what Allaah has revealed) and contradicts out of disobedience, then this
person is not a disbeliever because he has not made it halaal and he could have
done it out of fear, inability or the likes. Based on this the three verses (of al-
Maa’idah) are applied in three instances:
1. Whoever rules by other than what Allaah has revealed via changing the deen of
Allaah – this is major kufr which expels one out of the religion, because he has
made himself a legislator with Allaah and because he hates Allaah’s Sharee’ah.
2. Whoever rules (by other than what Allaah has revealed) due to following his
desires in himself, or out of fear or the likes – this person has not disbelieved but
has fallen into fisq.
3. Whoever rules with transgression and oppression and this is not related to the
ruling of man-made laws but related to a specific ruling like ruling the people by
other than what Allaah has revealed to avenge himself then it is said that this type is
a dhaalim and the descriptions differ depending on the conditions. Some scholars
say that the descriptions for one description and that every kaafir is a dhaalim and
every kaafir is a faasiq, they use as evidence for this the saying of Allaah,
ϥ
˴ Ϯ˵Ϥϟ˶Ύ͉ψϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϥϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˴ϭͽ
“…and the disbelievers they are the wrong-doers”
And,
έ˵ Ύ͉Ϩϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ΍˴ϭ˸΄Ϥ˴ ϓ˴ ΍Ϯ˵Ϙδ

˴ ϓ˴ ˴Ϧϳ˶άϟ͉΍Ύ͉ϣ΃˴ϭ˴ ͽ
“But as for those who defiantly disobeyed, their refuge is the Fire.”
{as-Sajdah (32): 20}
This is major fisq.1

May Allaah have mercy on him and reward him with and elevate him in Paradise
to the highest levels.
Aboo Baseer however says,
“From what has preceded, the following matters have been clarified:

7DKGKHHUPLQ)LWQDWLW7DNIHHU+A0A1

1. The verses were revealed about the kuffaar from the people of the book
and applied to other who reject the rule of Allaah.
2. The verses intend when applied: major kufr, major fisq and major
dhulm because they were revealed about the people of the book and
whoever rejects the rule of Allaah. It is not like how the scholars of Irjaa’
regard the verses as referring to kufr less than kufr, dhulm less than dhulm
and fisq less than fisq, based on the statements of Ibn ’Abbaas!! It is a true
statement but they intend a false conclusion and to place the truth in an
improper place is false, and applying it in a way which is not possible.”1
)$/6(35,1&,3/(6$1''$1*(52865,6.6
Aboo Baseer says,
ϥϮΑέΎΤϳϭˬͿ΍ϢϜΣϥϮπϓήϳϦϤϣ΍ϮϧΎϛϥ·ϢϬϟΎΤϟήψϨϳˬϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ϰϠϋΕΎϳϵ΍ϞϤΣΪϨϋ
ϢϜΤΑͿ΍ϢϜΣ΍ϮϟΪΑΪϗϭˬͿ΍ωήηϲϫΎπϳϱάϟ΍ϊϳήθΘϟ΍ϥϮϋήθϳϭˬͿ΍ϰϟ·ϢϜΤϟ΍ΓΎϋΩ
ˬΔϠϤϟ΍ϦϣΝήΨϤϟ΍ήΒϛϷ΍ϖδϔϟ΍ϭήΒϛϷ΍ϢϠψϟ΍ϭήΒϛϷ΍ήϔϜϟ΍ϢϬϴϠϋϖΒτϨϳ˯ϻΆϬϓ˭ΕϮϏΎτϟ΍
ϮϫϭˬϝΎϘϤϟ΍ϥΎδϟϦϣϯϮϗ΃ϝΎΤϟ΍ϥΎδϟϥϷˬͿ΍ϢϜΣϥϭΪΤΠϳϢϬϧ΃ϢϬϧΎδϠΑ΍ϮΣήμϳϢϟϥ·ϭ
ΔϴψϔϠϟ΍Ϧ΋΍ήϘϟ΍ϢϬϨϣήϬψΗϭˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϥϮϤϜΤϳϦϤϣ΍ϮϧΎϛϥ·Ύϣ΃ˬήϔϜϟΎΑϢϬϴϠϋΪϫΎη
ϢϬΘϗΎσΪϬΟϥϮόδϳϢϬϧ΃ϭˬϪϴϠϋϢϬλήΣϭϪΑϢϫΎοέϭͿ΍ϢϜΤϟϢϬΒΣϰϠϋΔϟ΍Ϊϟ΍ΔϴϠόϔϟ΍ϭ
ϭ΃ϒόοϭ΃ϯϮϬϟͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑΎϬϴϓϥϮϤϜΤϳϞ΋ΎδϤϟ΍ξόΑϭ΃Δϟ΄δϣϲϓϢϫϢΛˬϪϘϴΒτΘϟ
ϝϮϗϢϬϴϠϋϞϤΤϳ˯ϻΆϫϞΜϤϓˬϢΛϹΎΑϢϫέϮόηϭήϴμϘΘϟΎΑϢϬϓ΍ήΘϋ΍ϊϣˬϞσΎΑϞϳϭ΄Ηϭ΃ΓϮϬη
˰ϫ΍ϢϠχϥϭΩϢϠχϭήϔϛϥϭΩήϔϛαΎΒϋϦΑ΍
“In applying the verses to the Muslims we can see their condition: if they are
from those who reject the rule of Allaah; fight against those who call to rule
by Allaah; legislate that which they claim is equal to the Divine Legislation of
Allaah, and substitute the rule of Allaah with the rule of tawaagheet – then
these will have major kufr, major dhulm and major fisq applied to them
which ejects them from the religion – even if they do not openly with their
tongues reject the rule of Allaah, because the actual state carries more weight

$W7DDJKRRW+@E@@

than the statement which is spoken, as kufr has been witnessed from them.
As for those who are from the ones who judge by what Allaah has revealed
and verbal and physical attestations have been manifested which indicate
their love of the rule of Allaah, their pleasure with it and their concern for it
and they strive hard with all their energy to implement it and then after all
this they rule according to other than what Allaah has revealed in some
issues out of desire, weakness, passions or erroneous interpretations, along
with their admittance of shortcomings and sinful feelings – then the likes of
these will have applied to them the statement of Ibn ’Abbaas: “Kufr less than
kufr and dhulm less than dhulm.”1
I say: Aboo Baseer establishes a principle and foundation which Allaah has not
revealed any authority for and is not known from the Salaf. Rather, this is
provocative speech of agitation which does not indicate an academic methodology
at all and if it indicates anything it shows his haste in speaking without
knowledge.
Shaykh Muhammad Rasheed Ridaa (raheemahullaah) states in Tafseer al-Manaar,
vol.6, pp. 405-06:
Many of the Muslims tried to come up with legislative systems and rule similar to
those invented by people before them. By their ruling with that, they left behind
some of what Allaah revealed to them. Those who leave the judgements that Allaah
revealed in His Boo, without doing so out of interpretation, believing that this is
correct, then what Allaah said in these three Aayaat is true about them, or at least
some of them, each based upon his circumstances:
So the one who relinquishes the judgment for theft, slander, fornication,
without, without any sense of remorse occurring in him for doing so, believing that
other than those judgments is better, then the news about him is clear – he is a
disbeliever, period. Whoever does not judge by this, with other excuses, then he is
a wrong-doer, as long as he has only missed the truth and neglected justice and
equality in that matter, otherwise he is disobedient. And we say many of the
Muslims who believe that people who have ruling systems based upon man-made
law are disbelievers, taking the apparentness of the saying of Allaah,

$W7DDJKRRW+@@

Causing them to make takfeer on the judge who judges by these laws, and takfeer
of the leaders and sultans who institute these systems. Since, even though they are
not aware of them all, they have given them their approval, and they are the ones
who put the judges in their posts…as for the apparentness of the aayaah, then this
has not been said by any of the Imaams of fiqh that are well-known, rather not by
any one, period.1

+,6 6,&. 81'(567$1',1* 2) 7+( 6$<,1* 2) ,%1
¶$%%$$6µ.8)5/(667+$1.8)5¶
Aboo Baseer says:
ϮϬϓͿ΍ϢϜΣΪΤΟϦϣϥ΃ϭˬΏΎΘϜϟ΍Ϟϫ΃έΎϔϛϲϓΖϟΰϧΕΎϳϵ΍ϥ·ϝϮϘϳαΎΒϋϦΑ΍ϥΎϛ΍Ϋ·
ˮΔϠϤϟ΍ϦϣϞϘϨϳϱάϟ΍ήϔϜϟΎΑβϴϟϪϧ·ϭˬήϔϛϥϭΩήϔϛϪϟϮϘΑΪμϘϳϦϣ˱΍Ϋ·ˬήϓΎϛ
ΖϋΩϲΘϟ΍ΏΎΒγϷ΍ϭϪΑΔτϴΤϤϟ΍ϑϭήψϟ΍ϭˬϪϧΎϣίϙ΍έΩ·ϝϮϘϟ΍ΕϻϮϟΪϣϪϘϓϡΎϤΗϦϣϥΈϓ
ϢϟϦϳάϟ΍ˬΔϴϣ΃ϲϨΑϡΎϜΣϢϫϭϪϟϦϳήλΎόϣϦϴϤϠδϣ˱ΎϣΎϜΣΪμϘϳϥΎϛϪϨϋͿ΍ϲοέαΎΒϋϥ΃ϭˬϪϴϟ·
ϡϮϤϋϲϓΔόϳήθϟ΍ϥϮϤϜΤϳ΍ϮϧΎϛϭˬϪΑΔϧΎϬΘγϻ΍ϭ΃Ϳ΍ϢϜΤϟϢϫΩϮΤΟϰϠϋΔϟ΍Ϊϟ΍Ϧ΋΍ήϘϟ΍ϢϬϨϣήϬψΗ
ϰϨόϤϟ΍ϮϫϭαΎΒϋϦΑ΍ϞΌγϪϨϋϭ˰ϦϴϳϮϣϷ΍ΪϬϋϲϓϢϜΤϟ΍ϲϓ΃ήσϱάϟ΍ϑ΍ήΤϧϻ΍ϭˬαΎϨϟ΍ΓΎϴΣ
ϢϜΤϟ΍ϦϳΪϟ΍ϦϣΪϘϔϳΎϣϝϭ΃ϪϟϮϘΑϢϠγϭϪϴϠϋͿ΍ϰϠλϲΒϨϟ΍Ϫϴϟ·έΎη΃Ϊϗϭ˰ϪϣϼϛϦϣ
ϡΎψϧϰϟ·ΔϔϴϠΨϟ΍έΎϴΘΧ΍ϲϓϪΘϨγήϴϐϳϱ΃Δϴϣ΃ϲϨΑϦϣϞΟέϲΘϨγήϴϐϳϦϣϝϭ΃ϝΎϗϭ
ϢϫήϔϜΑϝΎϗΪΣ΃ϻϭˬϩΩϻϭ΃ϭΔϳϭΎόϣϡϼγ·ϲϓϚθϳϻϚϟΫϊϣϭˬϲΛ΍έϭ

%
& 5XOLQJ E\ 2WKHU WKDQ ZKDW $OODK 5HYHDOHG 7KH
)XQGDPHQWDOVRI7DNILU+S((<" 3,Q@@@=+@?J

ϲϨΑϡΎϜΣϪΑΪμϘϳϥΎϛϱάϟ΍˰ήϔϛϥϭΩήϔϛ˰αΎΒϋϦΑ΍ϡϼϛϞϤΣήϫΎψϟ΍΄τΨϟ΍ϦϤϓϪϴϠϋϭ
ϊϴϤΟϢϬϴϓΖόϤΘΟ΍ϭˬϞόϔϟ΍ϭϝϮϘϟΎΑͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϢϜΤϟ΍΍ϮϠΤΘγ΍ήμόϟ΍΍άϫϲϓϡΎϜΣϰϠϋΔϴϣ΃
ϥΎϤϳϹ΍ξϗ΍Ϯϧ
“If Ibn ’Abbaas stated: ‘The verses were revealed regarding the kuffaar of the
Ahl ul-Kitaab’ and that ‘whoever rejects the rule of Allaah is a disbeliever’
therefore who does he intend with this saying: ‘kufr less than kufr’ and that
‘it is not the kufr which expels from the religion’? From the perfection of
fiqh is ‘indications from statements’ which understand the time he was
living in, and the circumstances and reasons which affected him. As a result,
this shows that Ibn ’Abbaas intended the Muslim rulers of his time, the Bani
Umayyah who did not manifest rejection of the rule of Allaah or mock it.
They ruled by the Divine Legislation generally in people’s affairs and the
deviation which emerged during Umayyad rule was what Ibn ’Abbaas was
asked about and this is the meaning of his saying. The Prophet indicated this
to Ibn ’Abbaas with his saying “The first to lose the rule of the deen.” And he
said “The first to change any Sunnah are men from the Bani Umayyah”
meaning: changing his Sunnah in choosing a Khaleefah to a hereditary
system (succession). With this there is no doubt of the Islaam of Mu’awiyah
and his descendents and no one made takfeer of them. From the most
apparent errors is to apply the statement of Ibn ’Abbaas, of ‘kufr less than
kufr’, wherein he intended the Umayyad leaders, to the leaders of the
current era who make it halaal to rule by other than what Allaah has
revealed by statements and actions and thus combine within themselves all
of the nullifiers of eemaan.”
Then Aboo Baseer transmitted in the footnotes the words of Muhammad Qutb
saying:
ϮϫϭϝΎϗΎϣϝΎϗΪϘϓαΎΒϋϦΑ΍ϡϮϠψϣήλΎόϤϟ΍ΎϨόϗ΍ϭϪΑΎΘϛϲϓΐτϗΦϴθϟ΍ϝΎϗ
ϕϼσϹ΍ϰϠϋΪΣ΃ϦϣΎϣϭˮϢϬϴϓϝϮϘϟ΍ΎϤϓˬͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϣήϴϐΑϥϮϤϜΤϳϢϬϧ΃ˬϦϴϳϮϣϷ΍Ϧϋϝ΄δ˵ϳ
ϥϭΪϴΤϳϢϬϨϜϟϭˬαΎϨϟ΍ΓΎϴΣϡϮϤϋϲϓΔόϳήθϟ΍ϥϮϤϜΤϳ΍ϮϧΎϛΪϘϓέΎϔϛϢϬϧ·ϦϴϳϮϣϷ΍ϦϋϝΎϗ
ϢϬΘϔϟΎΨϣϥϮϠόΠϳϻϢϬϨϜϟϭ˰ΓϮϬηΎϣ·ϭ˱ϻϭ΄ΗΎϣ·ϢϬϧΎτϠδΑΔϘϠόΘϤϟ΍έϮϣϷ΍ξόΑϲϓΎϬϨϋ
ϦΑϻϦϜϤϳϥΎϛϞϬϓˬήϔϛϥϭΩήϔϛϪϧ·αΎΒϋϦΑ΍ϢϬϴϓϝΎϘϓ˰Ϳ΍ωήθϟ˱ΎϴϫΎπϣ˱ΎόϳήθΗ
ˮΔϴόοϭϦϴϧ΍ϮϗΎϬϨϣ˱ϻΪΑϊπϳϭˬ˱ϼλ΃ΔϴϣϼγϹ΍Δόϳήθϟ΍ϲ˷ΤϨϳϦϤϴϓ΍άϫϝϮϘϳϥ΃αΎΒϋ

“Shaykh Qutb said in his book ‘Our Current Situation’, p.334:
‘Ibn ’Abbaas was oppressed and thus said what he did and he was asked
about the Umayyads. They ruled by other than what Allaah had revealed, so
what is the position on them? No one at all said that the Umayyads were
kuffaar and they ruled by other than what Allaah had revealed in the affairs
of the people however they restricted it in some matters related to their
governance due to false interpretations or desires. However, they made their
contradictions as legislations to match the Divine Legislation of Allaah. Ibn
’Abbaas said about them: “Kufr less than kufr”, so it is possible that Ibn
’Abbaas said this about those who totally negate the Islamic Sharee’ah and
put in place man-made laws as a substitute (to the Sharee’ah).’”1?!
I say: Restricting the statement of Ibn ’Abbaas to only legislation, has no daleel and
has to be rejected. I do not know of any of the Salaf who applied the speech of
Ibn ’Abbaas to only the rulers of Bani Umayyah. Also, was Ibn ’Abbaas unable to
make clear what he intended about the Bani Umayyah? How could his “intended
meanings” be unknown for 1400 years from the Taabi’oon and those after them
up to today when Aboo Baseer and his Shaykh Muhammad Qutb came along and
applied their restricted takfeeree view of it!!?
Rather, the scholars of Islaam and its notables past and present have attested
to the narration of Ibn ’Abbaas with the explanation that we have given, this
narration became an academic principle for them to refute the people of
innovation. They also use the narration as a principle of knowledge in the issue of
disobedience which is described as kufr but not absolute kufr. Their speech in
regards to this has preceded such as ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed
with juhood (rejection) and istihlaal (legalising) is disobedience and a major sin.
Their basis is the narration of Ibn ’Abbaas in the tafseer of the verse of al-
Maa’idah. From Taawoos who said:
ϪΑϮϫϝΎϗˮήϓΎϛϮϬϓͿ΍ϝΰϧ΃ΎϤΑϢϜΤϳϢϟϦϣαΎΒϋϦΑϻΖϠϗϝΎϗαϭϭΎσϦϋ
ήΧϵ΍ϡϮϴϟ΍ϭϪϠγέϭϪΒΘϛϭϪΘϜ΋ϼϣϭͿΎΑήϔϛϦϤϛβϴϟϭˬήϔϛ
I said to Ibn ’Abbaas: ‘Whoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed, is he a
disbeliever?’ Ibn ’Abbaas replied: ‘Within him is kufr, but he is not like the one who
disbelieves in Allaah, the Angels, the Books, the Messengers and the Last Day.’

$W7DDJKRRW+@EA

We have already mentioned the speech of the people of knowledge so we will

not repeat it again, the clarification is complete and needs nothing to be added to
it.1 Shaykh Saleem al-Hilaalee stated:
I add to this here an important matter which is they intend to prove that the kings
of the Bani Umayyah and Bani ’Abbaas did not rule with a Khilaafah which was on
the Prophetic manhaj and it was like this except that the system of rule with the
Bani Umayah and Banu’l-’Abbaas ruled by what Allaah had revealed but they mixed
in disobedience which some of them fell into, or they contradicted the rule of
Allaah due to following desires. The likes of these are not to be said to be ruling by
other than what Allaah has revealed for the following reasons:
1. The disobedient one, or the one who commits a major sin, is not to be called ‘a
ruler by other than what Allaah has revealed’ rather he has committed something
which Allaah has prohibited. The one who rules by other than what Allaah has
revealed has his own legislation other than what Allaah has revealed by which he
rules and refers to. As for the disobedient one then he has nothing external which
he has come with to rule by and refer to that is outside of the Divine Legislation of
Allaah. Rather he contradicted what Allaah revealed.
2. The one who rules by other than what Allaah has revealed, if he is ignorant then he
is not considered to be ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed. Rather, the
rule of Allaah is hidden from him and he thinks that his rule is in agreement with
what Allaah has revealed.
3. Those Caliphs of the Umayyads and the Abbasids who opposed the rule of Allaah
were either: ignorant of the rule of Allaah; fell into making false interpretations;
followed their desires or was confused and deceived by his ministers and if the
people of knowledge showed him (the proofs) he would retract and seek to return
to the truth. It is said that al-Ma’moon had Shi’ism and allowed Mut’a, but then
Yahyaa Ibn Aktham entered upon Ma’moon and informed him of the hadeeth
wherein Mut’a was prohibited. When al-Ma’moon came to know of the authenticity
of the hadeeth he retracted from it to the truth and openly prohibited Mut’a (adh-
Dhahabee, Siyar A’laam un-Nubalaa, vol.10, p.283).
4. This understanding is the understanding of the Khawaarij and not the understanding
of the Salaf us-Saalih.2

('P D+B+MBU)> D+A+0MMM?U)D+B+J0MD
(
& # +
B &6 4XUUDWXO¶8\RRQ+EE

Imaam al-Bukhaaree has the chapter in his Saheeh ‘Chapter: Kufr Towards
Spouses and Kufr Less than Kufr’. Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajar in al-Fath, vol.1, p.83
transmits from al-Qaadee Ibn al-’Arabee al-Maalikee who said:
ˬ˱΍ήϔϛϰϤδΗϲλΎόϤϟ΍Ϛϟάϛ˱ΎϧΎϤϳ·ϰϤδΗΎϤϛΕΎϋΎτϟ΍ϥ΃ϦϴΒϳϥ΃>ϱέΎΨΒϟ΍@ϒϨμϤϟ΍Ω΍ήϣ
˰ϫ΍ΔϠϤϟ΍ϦϣΝήΨϤϟ΍ήϔϜϟ΍Ω΍ήϳϻήϔϜϟ΍ΎϬϴϠϋϖϠτϳΚϴΣϦϜϟ
The intent of the classifier (i.e. Imaam al-Bukhaaree) is to clarify that just as
actions of obedience are named ‘eemaan’ likewise acts of disobedience are
named ‘kufr’. However, when they are referred to as being ‘kufr’ the intent is
not the kufr which expels one from the religion.

)520$%22%$6((5¶6&2175$',&7,216
Aboo Baseer states:
ˬϪϟϮϋΪΗϭήϔϜϟ΍ΝϭήΗϲΘϟ΍ΐΘϜϟ΍ˬΕϮϏΎτϟ΍ϦϣωϮϨϟ΍΍άϫϲϓϚϟάϛϞΧΪϳΎϣϭ
ΔϴϧΎϤϠόϟ΍Ώ΍ΰΣϷ΍ΞϫΎϨϣϭΉΩΎΒϣϰϠϋϱϮΘΤΗϲΘϟ΍ΐΘϜϟ΍ϚϠΗΎϬϨϣΔλΎΨΑϭ
ΎϫήϴϏϭΓήϓΎϜϟ΍

“What is likewise included in this type of taaghoot are books which call to
kufr. Especially those books which contain the foundations and methods of
disbelieving secular partisanship and the likes.”
In the footnotes Aboo Baseer adds to this statement:
Δϴϣϼγ·ΎϬδϔϧϲϤδΗϲΘϟ΍ΔλΎΨΑϭ˰ήθϨϟ΍έϭΩϰϠϋϦϴϤ΋ΎϘϟ΍ϦϣϲϋΪΘδϳ΍άϫϭ
ϰϠϋϝ΍Ϊϟ΍ϥΈϓΕϻϼπϟ΍ϭϙήθϟ΍ϭήϔϜϟ΍ϰϠϋϱϮΘΤΗΐΘϛήθϧϦϋωΎϨΘϣϻ΍
ϪϠϋΎϔϛήθϟ΍
“So with this, the owners of distributing companies should be prepared,
especially those distributers which are called ‘Islamic’, to withhold
distributing such books which contain kufr, shirk and misguidance which
lead to evil like the one who does it.”
I say: This ‘advice’ is full of lies, tricks and deception and the first who should be
advised of this is you (O Abaa Baseer)!? For the books of Sayyid Qutb which you
base your booklets on are the first to fall into what you (Aboo Baseer) have
mentioned! For the books (of Sayyid Qutb) are full of innovation and misguidance,
just as you mentioned, here are some of them:
1. Evil manners in talking about a Prophet of Allaah, Moosaa (alayhi salaam),
1
describing him as being excitable and emotional.
2. Speaking about Yoosuf (‘alayhi salaam)2 as being almost weakened.
3. A lack of differentiating between Tawheed Ruboobiyyah and Tawheed
Uloohiyyah. Indeed, he explained ‘La ilaha il-Allaah’ as being Tawheed
Ruboobiyyah and explained Allaah’s saying “He is Allaah, there is no deity
except He” as: “Meaning: He has no partner in creation and choosing”.3
4
4. Wahdat ul-Wujood.
5. Making takfeer of all Muslims.5
6. Saying that the Qur’aan is created.6

$W7DVZHHUDO)DQQHHIL¶O4XU¶DDQ<"F=+?B?1
B)++?EU)HH'KLODDOLO4XU¶DDQD+B+@M1
0)HH'KLODDOLO4XU¶DDQ<"F=D+M+BJAJ
1)+D+?+01J@
M)+D+B+AMJD+1+BBB
?)+D++A?

7. Denying the Attributes of Allaah in exactly the same way as the Jahmiyyah,
1
he explained istiwaa as being ‘isti’laa’.
8. Allowing man-made legislations.2
9. Abusing and cursing the Sahaabah and the successors and claimed that
’Uthmaan (radi Allaahu ’anhu) gave special treatment to his own family.3
And other deviations which the books of this man are filled with such as
statements supporting that there is no-free-will, incarnation, the finite nature of the
soul, denying that Allaah will be seen and other major innovations that his books
repeat. So if you (Aboo Baseer!) are really advising for the sake of Allaah and His
Messenger, then the first thing you would do is warn against the books of Sayyid
Qutb and those like him from the takfeerees, because by Allaah, they are the first
to curse the Salafees such as Imaam Muhammad Naasiruddeen al-Albaanee
(raheemahullaah). However, Aboo Baseer testifies that his own books are
nurtured upon the takfeer in the books of Sayyid Qutb, so how can he warn
against Sayyid Qutb?! The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wassallam)
spoke the truth when he said “There is about to come to the people years of
deception wherein the liar will be regarded as truthful and the truthful will be
regarded as liars and the deceiver will be trusted and the trustworthy will be
thought of as a deceiver and the Ruwaybidah will begin to speak.” Then it was
asked: “And what are the Ruwaybidah?” He (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) said
4
“The foolish insignificant man who speaks about general affairs.”
Aboo Shaamah said:

Most of the innovations that people commit are due to this reason, they think that a
person is from the people of knowledge and taqwaa and yet in reality he is not like
that at all. They praise their sayings and actions and follow the individual and thus
their affairs become corrupted. In the hadeeth of Thawbaan the Prophet

)+D+1+B0J1
B$O¶$GDDODKDO,MWLPDD¶L\\DK > *+B?)HH'KLODDOLO4XU¶DDQD+0+??@

0$O¶$GDDODKDO,MWLPDD¶L\\DK<"F1MM6=+?E?@0BA?
1 ()C ( DV6DKHHKDK+EEE

(sallallaahu’alayhi wassallam) said “What I fear for my Ummah is the leaders of
1
misguidance.”

7+( 35,1&,3/( 2) .+8522- 5(92/7 $&&25',1* 72
$%22%$6((5
Aboo Baseer says,
ϰοήϟ΍ϭϪϴϠϋΕϮϜδϟ΍˱΍έήοϭΔϨΘϓϪϨϣΪηϷ΍ϦϜϟϭˬΔϨΘϓϢϛΎΤϟ΍ϰϠϋΝϭήΨϟΎϓ
ΐΟ΍Ϯϟ΍ϭˬΔϨΘϓϩϮϠόΗϻΔϨΘϓϭϢϠχϩϮϠόϳϻϢϠχϙήθϟΎϓˬΡ΍ϮΒϟ΍ήϔϜϟ΍ϦϠόϳϮϫϭϪΑ
Ϳ΍ϭˬ˱΍έήοΪηϷ΍ϪΑϊϓΪϴϟ˱΍έήοϞϗϷ΍ϡΪϘϳϥ΃ΎϬϟΎΜϣ΃ϭΔϟΎΤϟ΍ϩάϫϲϓ
ϥΎόΘδϤϟ΍
“Rebelling against the leader is a fitna, however what is an even worse fitna
and more harmful is being quiet about such a leader and being pleased with
him when he promotes explicit kufr. So shirk of dhulm does not cover up
dhulm and fitna does not cover up fitna, so it is obligatory in this
circumstance and in similar circumstances to put forward the lesser harm to
avert the worse harm.”
I say: This type of speech originates from ideas and emotions, not from guidance
and revelation, and it opposes the manhaj of the Salaf and those virtuous scholars
who followed their way. He based this on emotions, enthusiasm and emotion and
its end results are nothing but destruction and the loss of security and safety, the
falseness of this is from a number of angles:
1. It is well known that Aboo Baseer, and his school of thought, have special
principles for takfeer and expelling people, rules and ruled, from the fold of
Islaam. These principles are not known except by the first and last of the
Khawaarij, as explicit kufr according to them is not explicit kufr according to Ahl
us-Sunnah.
For arguments sake, just because a person is living under the rule of law of a
disbeliever, that does not necessitate the person being pleased with that kufr. This

()C% ( DV6DKHHKDK+MEB+

would make Aboo Baseer a disbeliever choosing to make hijra, without necessity,
to the lands of kufr.
3. The issue of estimating the intense necessity or the lack of necessity is to be
determined by the ’Ulama as they are able to judge that and view the benefits. As
for the juhaal and pseudo-scholars then it is not permissible for them to delve into
such major issues which are based on blood-shed and taking wealth and honour.
ϝϮγέΚόΑΪϗϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ϥΈϓͿ΍ϪϤΣέΔϴϤϴΗϦΑ΍ϡϼγϹ΍ΦϴηϝΎϗ
Ϳ΍εϢψϋ΃ϊϓΩϭˬΎϬϠϴϠϘΗϭΪγΎϔϤϟ΍ϞϴτόΗϭˬΎϬϠϴϤϜΗϭ΢ϟΎμϤϟ΍ϞϴμΤΘΑ
ήϜϨϤϟ΍ϦϋϲϬϨϟ΍ϭϑϭήόϤϟΎΑήϣϷ΍ϥΎϛ΍Ϋ·ϭˬΎϤϫΎϧΩ΃ϡ΍ΰΘϟΎΑϦϳΪγΎϔϟ΍
ΔΤΟ΍έϪϴϓΔΤϠμϤϟ΍ϥϮϜΗϥ΃ΪΑϼϓˬΕΎΒΤΘδϤϟ΍ϭΕΎΒΟ΍Ϯϟ΍Ϣψϋ΃Ϧϣ
ϢϟϪΘΤϠμϣϦϣϢψϋ΃ϲϬϨϟ΍ϭήϣϷ΍ΓΪδϔϣΖϧΎϛΚϴΤϓˬΓΪδϔϤϟ΍ϰϠϋ
ϪΑͿ΍ήϣ΃ΎϤϣϦϜϳ
Allaah sent the Messenger to achieve benefits and perfect them, and to
nullify corruptions and reduce them, and to avert the greater of the 2
corruptions via adhering to the lesser of them. Therefore, commanding the
good and forbidding the evil is from the greatest obligations and
recommended actions, there must be a benefit to counter harm, and where
the harm and forbiddance is greater then the benefit, it is not something
which Allaah instructs to do.1
4. If it is affirmed that a ruler has committed kufr then revolting against him is not
permissible except when the people in authority and ability have the ability in
numbers and preparedness to do this. This is not common especially during these
days because the power and strength is in the hand of the ruler and revolting

0LQKDDMXV6XQQDKD+1+MBJ0DMPRR¶DO)DWDDZDDD+BE+B?

against him will result in corruption, instability, the loss of safety and security and
blood-shed. Yet the Sharee’ah came to achieve benefits and perfect them and to
minimize corruption and disruption.
Ibn ul-Qaasim (raheemahullaah) said:
Δϣ΃ϰϠϋ΍ϮΟήΨϓˬϢϠόϟ΍΍ϮϋΎο΃ϭΓΩΎΒόϟ΍΍ϮϐΘΑ΍˱Ύϣ΍Ϯϗ΃ϥ·ϝϮϘϳ˱ΎϜϟΎϣΖόϤγ
ΪϤΤϣεϚϟΫϦϋϢϫΰΠΤϟϢϠόϟ΍΍ϮόΒΗ΍ϮϟϭˬϢϬϓΎϴγ΄Α
I heard Maalik saying ‘A People wanted to increase in worship and left
seeking knowledge and fought against the Ummah of Muhammad with their
swords, but if only they followed correct knowledge it would have saved
them from that.’1
ϦΑͿ΍ΪΒϋϥΎϛΎϤϛˬΔϨΘϔϟ΍ϲϓϝΎΘϘϟ΍ϭΝϭήΨϟ΍ϦϋϥϮϬϨϳϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ϞοΎϓ΃ϥΎϛϭ
ΝϭήΨϟ΍ϦϋΓήΤϟ΍ϡΎϋϥϮϬϨϳϢϫήϴϏϭϦϴδΤϟ΍ϦΑϲϠϋϭΐϴδϤϟ΍ϦΑΪϴόγϭήϤϋ
ϲϓΝϭήΨϟ΍ϦϋϥϮϬϨϳΎϤϫήϴϏϭΪϫΎΠϤϟ΍ϭϱήμΒϟ΍ϦδΤϟ΍ϥΎϛΎϤϛϭˬΪϳΰϳϰϠϋ
ΚϳΩΎΣϸϟΔϨΘϔϟ΍ϲϓϝΎΘϘϟ΍ϙήΗϰϠϋΔϨδϟ΍ήϣ΃ήϘΘγ΍΍άϬϟϭˬΚόηϷ΍ϦΑ΍ΔϨΘϓ
ϲΒϨϟ΍ϦϋΔΘΑΎΜϟ΍ΔΤϴΤμϟ΍εϥϭήϣ΄ϳϭˬϢϫΪ΋ΎϘϏϲϓ΍άϫϥϭήϛάϳ΍ϭέΎλϭˬ
ϦϣήϴΜϛϖϠΧΔϨΘϔϟ΍ϲϓϞΗΎϗΪϗϥΎϛϥ·ϭˬϝΎΘϘϟ΍ϙήΗϭΔϤ΋Ϸ΍έϮΟϰϠϋήΒμϟΎΑ
˰ΔϨδϟ΍ΝΎϬϨϣϦϳΪϟ΍ϭϢϠόϟ΍Ϟϫ΃
The best of the Muslims forbade revolting (khurooj) and fighting (qitaal)
during times of fitna, as ’Abdullaah ibn ’Umar, Sa’eed ibn Musayyib and ’Ali
bin al-Husayn and others forbade revolting against Yazeed during the year of
al-Harrah and just as Hasan al-Basree, Mujaahid and others forbade revolting
during the fitna of Ibn ’Ash’ath, for this reason it became established as an
instruction of the Sunnah to abandon fighting during tribulation due to the
authentic hadeeth from the Prophet (sallalaahu ’alayhi wassallam) and they
began to mention this in their creeds and they instructed (the Muslims) to
have patience with the transgression of the leaders and to abandon fighting

0LIWDDK'DDULV6D¶DDGDKD++@

against them even if many people of knowledge and deen participate in
fighting during fitna.1
From Sulaymaan bin ’Ali ar-Rabi’ee who said:
During the fitna of Ibn ’Ash’ath when Hajjaaj ibn Yoosuf was fought against, ’Uqbah
bin ’AbdulGhaffaar, Abu’l-Jowzaa’ and ’Abdullaah bin Ghaalib went to see al-Hasan
al-Basree with their ideas and they said to him: ‘O Abaa Sa’eed! What do you say
about fighting a transgressor who sheds sanctified blood, takes sanctified wealth,
abandons the prayer etc?’ al-Hasan replied ‘I view that he should not be fought
against, because he is nothing but a punishment from Allaah and you’re not able to
avert the punishment of Allaah with your swords, even if it is a calamity. So be
patient until Allaah judges and He is the Best of Judges.’
Sulaymaan continued:
“So they left Hasan saying ‘Should we listen to this old man?’ and these were
Arabs?!” Then Sulaymaan stated: “They revolted along with Ibn ’Ash’ath and Hajjaaj
killed all of them.”2 Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah) stated:
ΎϣΩΎδϔϟ΍ϦϣΎϬΟϭήΧϲϓϥΎϛϭϻ·ϥΎτϠγϱΫϰϠϋΖΟήΧΔϔ΋ΎσϑήόϳΩΎϜϳϻ
ϪΘϟ΍ί΃ϱάϟ΍ΩΎδϔϟ΍ϦϣϢψϋ΃Ϯϫ
It is almost unheard of that a group revolted against the leader except that their
revolt contained corruption which was worse than the corruption that they tried to
remove in the first place.
Then Ibn Taymiyyah said:
ϼϓˬϢϬΑΎΤλ΃ϡΰ˵ϫϭ΍Ϯϣΰ˵ϬϓϢϫήϴϏϭΐϠϬϤϟ΍ϦΑ΍ϭΚόηϷ΍ϦΑ΍ϭΓήΤϟ΍Ϟϫ΃Ύϣ΃ϭ
ϻϭϦϳΪϟ΍ΡϼλϪΑϞμΤϳϻήϣ΄ΑΎϧήϣ΄ϳϰϟΎόΗͿ΍ϭˬΎϴϧΩ΍ϮϘΑ΃ϻϭ˱ΎϨϳΩ΍ϮϣΎϗ΃
ϲϠϋϦϣϞπϓ΃΍ϮδϴϠϓϦϴϘΘϤϟ΍Ϳ΍˯Ύϴϟϭ΃ϦϣϚϟΫϞϋΎϓϥΎϛϥ·ϭˬΎϴϧΪϟ΍Ρϼλ
ϝΎΘϘϟ΍Ϧϣϩ΍ϮϠόϓΎϣ΍ϭΪϤΤϳϢϟ΍άϫϊϣϭˬϢϫήϴϏϭήϴΑΰϟ΍ϭΔΤϠσϭΔθ΋Ύϋϭ
ΔϨδϟ΍ΝΎϬϨϣ
As for the people of Harraah, and Ibn ul-’Ash’ath and ibn ul-Muhallaab, who
also revolted, then they were defeated along with their companions and they
did not establish anything in the deen and nothing remained for them in the

0LQKDDMXV6XQQDKD+1+MB@0A
B7DEDTDDWXO.XEUDDD+J+?1

1
dunya. By Allaah they did not instruct to anything which rectified the deen
or the dunya2 even if the one who done that (revolted against the leader) was
from the people who Allaah protects or from those who have been promised
Paradise, they are not better than Ali, Aa’ishah, Talhah or Zubayr and others
(radi Allaahu ‘anhum). For this reason, even though they were companions
they were not praised for what they done of fighting. (Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn
Taymiyyah, Minhaaj us-Sunnah, vol.4, p.528)3
Imaam Bin Baaz was asked:
ΝϭήΨϠϟΐΟϮϣή΋ΎΒϜϟ΍ϭϲλΎόϤϠϟϢϛΎΤϟ΍ϑ΍ήΘϗ΍ϥ΃ϯήϳϦϣϙΎϨϫΦϴθϟ΍ΔΣΎϤγ
ϲΘϟ΍Ι΍ΪΣϷ΍ϭˬΪϠΒϟ΍ϲϓϦϴϤϠδϤϠϟέήοϪϴϠϋΐΗήΗϥ·ϭήϴϴϐΘϟ΍ΔϟϭΎΤϣϭˬϢϬϴϠϋ
ˮ΍άϫϲϓϢϜΘϠϴπϓϱ΃έΎϤϓˬΓήϴΜϛϲϣϼγϹ΍ΎϨϤϟΎϋΎϬϨϣϲϧΎόϳ
“Question: O Respected Shaykh there are those who view that the practice of
disobedience and major sins by some of the rulers necessitates revolting
against them and try to change them even if will cause some harm to the
Muslims of the country and the incidents of this in the Islamic world are
plentiful. What is your view on this?”
Imaam Bin Baaz answered:
’Ubaadah ibn as-Saamit (radi Allaahu ‘anhu) said: “We pledged allegiance to the
Messenger of Allaah that we hear and obey and in what we love and what we hate
and in what is hard for us and what is not hard for us and even in things which we
do not like and not that we should not dispute over leadership and not try to
challenge those who possess it and are responsible for its affairs and try to wrestle it

)
(' GHHQ (
(' '(
(
D + ; ( (# ) #
, 9
P Q8 F &PSF'
("' &&P PF7
&3(( 2#&8

' +

(

GHHQ
GXQ\D
(# ) ) %((( UDKHHPDKXOODDK
#

' P D+% *
B ; "D 9 6KDUHH¶DK LVODDK <
=

GHHQ

(+% *
0 ,
' '
#C< D=# +% *

Refutation of Aboo Baseer at-Tartoosee and his Concepts of Taaghoot and Takfeer
_____________________________________________________________________________
from them.” Except if you see, as the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) stated,
“clear explicit (buwaahan) kufr.”
΍ϭήϳ ϥ΃ ϻ· ϢϬϴϠϋ ΝϭήΨϟ΍ ϻϭ έϮϣϷ΍ Γϻϭ ΔϋίΎϨϣ ϢϬϟ ίϮΠϳ ϻ ϢϬϧ΃ ϰϠϋ ϝΪϳ ΍άϫ
έϮϣϷ΍ Γϻϭ ϰϠϋ ΝϭήΨϟ΍ ϥϷ ϻ· ϙ΍Ϋ Ύϣϭ ˬϥΎϫήΑ Ϫϴϓ Ϳ΍ Ϧϣ ϢϬϨϋ Ύ˱Σ΍ϮΑ ΍˱ήϔϛ
ωΩέ ήδϴΘϳ ϻϭ ϕϮϘΤϟ΍ ϊϴπΗϭ ϦϣϷ΍ ϪΑ ϞΘΨϴϓ ˬ˱ΎϤϴψϋ ΍˱ήηϭ ΍˱ήϴΒϛ ΍˱ΩΎδϓ ΐΒδϳ
Γϻϭ ϰϠϋ ΝϭήΨϟ΍ ϰϠϋ ΐΗήΘϴϓ ϦϣΆΗ ϻϭ ϞΒδϟ΍ ϞΘΨΗϭ ˬϡϮϠψϤϟ΍ Γήμϧ ϻϭ ϢϟΎψϟ΍
Ϫϴϓ Ϳ΍ Ϧϣ ϢϫΪϨϋ Ύ˱Σ΍ϮΑ ΍˱ήϔϛ ϥϮϤϠδϤϟ΍ ϯ΃έ ΍Ϋ· ϻ· ˬήϴΒϛ ήηϭ Ϣϴψϋ ΩΎδϓ έϮϣϷ΍
Ϣϟ ΍Ϋ· Ύϣ΃ ˬΓέΪϗ ϢϫΪϨϋ ϥΎϛ ΍Ϋ· ϪΘϟ΍ίϹ ϥΎτϠδϟ΍ ϰϠϋ ΍ϮΟήΨϳ ϥ΃ α΄Α ϼϓ ϥΎϫήΑ
ΝϭήΨϟ΍ ϢϬϟ βϴϠϓ ήΜϛ΃ ΍˱ήη ΐΒδϳ ΝϭήΨϟ΍ ϥΎϛ ϭ΃ ˬϥϮΟήΨϳ ϼϓ ΓέΪϗ ϢϫΪϨϋ ϦϜΗ
ήθϟ΍ Δϟ΍ί· ίϮΠϳ ϻ Ϫϧ΃ :ΎϬϴϠϋ ϊϤΠϤϟ΍ Δϴϋήθϟ΍ ΓΪϋΎϘϟ΍ϭ ˬΔϣΎόϟ΍ ΢ϟΎμϤϠϟ ΔϳΎϋέ
ήΜϛ΃ ήθΑ ήθϟ΍ ˯έΩ Ύϣ΃ ˬϪϔϔΨϳ ϭ΃ ϪϠϳΰϳ ΎϤΑ ήθϟ΍ ˯έΩ ΐΠϳ ϞΑ ˬϪϨϣ ήη΃ Ϯϫ ΎϤΑ
ϥΎτϠδϟ΍ ΍άϫ Δϟ΍ί· ΪϳήΗ ϲΘϟ΍ Δϔ΋Ύτϟ΍ ϩάϫ ΖϧΎϛ ΍ΫΈϓ ˬϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ ωΎϤΟΈΑ ίϮΠϳ ϼϓ
Ύ˱ Βϴσ Ύ˱ ΤϟΎλ Ύ˱ ϣΎϣ· ϊπΗϭ ϪϠϳΰΗ ϥ΃ ϰϠϋ ΓέΪϗ ΎϫΪϨϋ ϥϮϜϳϭ Ύ˱ Σ΍ϮΑ ΍˱ήϔϛ Ϟόϓ ϱάϟ΍
΍άϫ ήη Ϧϣ Ϣψϋ΃ ήηϭ ϦϴϤϠδϤϟ΍ ϰϠϋ ήϴΒϛ ΩΎδϓ ϚϟΫ ϰϠϋ ΐΗήΘϳ ϥ΃ ϥϭΩ
ϦϣϷ΍ ϝϼΘΧ΍ϭ ήϴΒϛ ΩΎδϓ ϪϴϠϋ ΐΗήΘϳ ΝϭήΨϟ΍ ϥΎϛ ΍Ϋ· Ύϣ΃ .α΄Α ϼϓ ϥΎτϠδϟ΍
ϻ ΍άϫ Ϣϴψόϟ΍ ΩΎδϔϟ΍ Ϧϣ ΍άϫ ήϴϏ ϰϟ· ϝΎϴΘϏϻ΍ ϖΤΘδϳ ϻ Ϧϣ ϝΎϴΘϏ΍ϭ αΎϨϟ΍ ϢϠχϭ
"...ΔϋΎτϟ΍ϭ ϊϤδϟ΍ϭ ήΒμϟ΍ ΐΠϳ ϞΑ ˬίϮΠϳ
This indicates that it is not permissible to compete with the people in authority or revolt
against them, except if clear and explicit kufr is seen from them with which you have a clear
proof from Allaah. As revolting against the people in authority causes great corruption, great
evil which destabilises security, takes away rights and does not hold back the transgressor or
help the oppressed, but blockades the paths. Great evil is based upon revolting against the
people in authority, except if the Muslims see clear and explicit kufr about which they have a
proof for from Allaah then there is no harm in them revolting against such a leader from his
position as long as they have the ability to do so. So if they do not have any capability (to
revolt) then they should not revolt as such a revolt will bring about a worse situation and they
should not revolt. This is for general rectification and the principle of the Divine
92
_____________________________________________________________________________
Revelation is general applied to it, that it is not permissible to bring an end to evil via
something which is worse (than the evil that one wishes to remove), it is obligatory to
bring an end to evil with that which is less problematic (than the actual evil). As for
challenging evil with that which will increase evil, then that is not permissible. It is
obligatory to avert evil with that which is the same as it or less (in negative effect) than
it. As for wanting to avert evil with that which will result in increasing evil, then does
this agree with the Divine Legislation? Does this agree with rectifying the situation?
This does not agree with rectification and does not comply with the Divine
Legislation. As for averting evil with that which is more evil then that is not
permissible according to the consensus of the Muslims. So if this group which wants
to bring an end this leader who performed clear and explicit (buwaahan) kufr, has the
ability to bring an end to it, along with a pious righteous good Imaam, is based upon
not causing a greater evil to the Muslims and will not bring about an evil far greater
than the evil of the leader (whom they seek to remove) then there is no problem. Yet if
the revolt is based on great corruption, the removal of safety and security, oppression of
people, occupying those who are not deserving to be, then such (a revolt) is not permissible.
Rather, patience is obligatory, listening (to the leader), obedience (to the leader) in that which
is good…1
However Aboo Baseer, who resides in the lands of kufr, and those like him from the
Khawaarij of the era, view that the deen will only return via violent confrontations with the
rulers, after having made takfeer of them without sufficient explanation, only on a premise
that they do not rule by what Allaah has revealed and they strive to incite the youth to
1 Maraaji’aat fee Fiqh il-Waaqi’ wa’l-Fikree fee Daw’ il-Kitaab wa’s-Sunnah, pp.25-26.
Translator’s Note: Imaam Bin Baaz continued in this fatwa saying, carrying on from where the quote left
off:
…advice to those responsible for the state of affairs, making du’a for goodness for
them, working hard to lesson evil, increasing goodness, all of this is the path of fairness
which is incumbent for one to traverse as within that is rectification for the general
Muslims. And also within that is lessening the evil and increasing goodness and within
that is preserving security and safety for the Muslims from greater evil. This is what the
Divine Legislation is established upon, the Divine Legislation of Islaam is based upon
achieving beneficial matters and averting harmful matters, achieving goodness and
averting evil, achieving guidance and averting misguidance, achieving justice and
averting transgression.
93
_____________________________________________________________________________
confront the governments considering this to be courageous and eemaan, as they claim. They
are heedless to or feigning heedlessness of, the fact that a confrontation must have the
conditions of being prepared for it as the statements of the scholars have highlighted; along
with being prepared in eemaan and there must be strength, not just in enthusiasm and
emotion by inciting people and aggravating them to cause blood-shed. The reality of the
situation of the Islamic Ummah in Algeria, Egypt, Syria and in other countries is an example
to whoever has a heart or listens.
Finally, I ask Allaah to grant success to the youth of this Ummah so that they return to the truth and to
His victory and to save them from the depths of extreism towards personalities and venerating them which
corrupts the mind and religion, He is Ever-Able to do that, all praise is due to Allaah, Lord of the Worlds.
Rabee’ al-Awwal 1422 [May 2001 CE]

Aboo Noor bin Hasan al-Kurdee
94

Refutation of Abu Basheer At-Tartoosee

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Refutation of Abu Basheer At-Tartoosee

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Refutation of Abu Basheer At-Tartoosee

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats



© Copyright SalafiManhaj 2007

him) O Messenger of Allaah?” The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) replied:

  # ZKRVHXSSHUDUPVZRXOGEHOLNHDZRPDQ

ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵ϘΘ͉ϳ˴ Ύ͉ϣϢ˵Ϭϟ˴˴Ϧϴ͋Β˴ ϳ˵ ϰ͉ΘΣ˴ ˸Ϣϫ˵ ΍˴Ϊϫ˴ ˸Ϋ·˶˴Ϊ˸όΑ˴ Ύ˱ϣ˸Ϯϗ˴ ͉Ϟπ

Tartoosee).1 He has authored a variety of books with well-known titles and he

us-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah, relying on the statements of Sayyid Qutb. In addition to

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

      +%           

Aboo Haatim ar-Raazee (raheemahullaah) stated: “The hallmarks of Ahl ul-Bidaa’

˵ϪΗ˵ Ύ˴ϳ΁˸ϢϬ˶ ˸ϴϠ˴ϋ

This is what we observe from Aboo Baseer’s writings as he revives every

ͼ΍˱ήϴ˶Μϛ˴ ˶ϪΑ˶ ϱ˶Ϊ˸Ϭϳ˴ ϭ˴ ˱΍ήϴ˶Μϛ˴ ˶ϪΑ˶ ͊Ϟπ

ͼ˯Ύ˴θϳ˴ Ϧ˴ϣϱ˶Ϊ˸Ϭϳ˴ ϭ˴ ˯Ύ˴θϳ˴ Ϧ˴ϣ˵ϪϠ͉ϟ΍͊Ϟπ

Prophetic methodology then the grand-children of the Khawaarij today have

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (raheemahullaah) said1:

To where Allaah said,

˯΍˴Ϯ˸ϫ΃˴˸΍Ϯ˵όΒ˶ Θ͉ Η˴ ˴ϻϭ˴ ͋ϖΤ ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ Ϩ˶ ϳ˶Ωϲ˶ϓ˸΍Ϯ˵Ϡ˸ϐΗ˴ ˴ϻ˶ΏΎ˴ΘϜ˶ ˸ϟ΍˴Ϟ˸ϫ΃˴Ύ˴ϳͽ

The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wassallam) said:

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵Ϙγ˶ Ύ˴ϔ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

 ('(#&5((&Q&  + )DWDDZDD

Shaykh ’Abdul’Azeez Bin Baaz (raheemahulaah) emphasised this again in his

ͼώ˴ Ϡ˴Α˴ Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ˶ϪΑ˶ Ϣ˵ϛέ˴ ά˶ ϧ˵Ϸͽ

However, the excess of Sayyid in focusing on al-Haakimiyyah and his ignorance

...And we do not find that he spoke about al-Haakimiyyah. If we follow the

   !! 9 #  ' (  

  VKLUN C   

˴Ϣϳ˴ ˸ήϣ˴ ˴Ϧ˸Α΍˴΢ϴ˶δϤ˴ ˸ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˶ϥϭ˵ΩϦ͋ϣΎ˱ΑΎ˴Α˸έ΃˴˸ϢϬ˵ ϧ˴ Ύ˴Β˸ϫέ˵ ϭ˴ ˸Ϣϫ˵ έ˴ Ύ˴Β˸Σ΃˴˸΍ϭ˵άΨ

˴Ϣϳ˴ ˸ήϣ˴ ˴Ϧ˸Α΍˴΢ϴ˶δϤ˴ ˸ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˶ϥϭ˵ΩϦ͋ϣΎ˱ΑΎ˴Α˸έ΃˴˸ϢϬ˵ ϧ˴ Ύ˴Β˸ϫέ˵ ϭ˴ ˸Ϣϫ˵ έ˴ Ύ˴Β˸Σ΃˴˸΍ϭ˵άΨ

˴Ϣϳ˴ ˸ήϣ˴ ˴Ϧ˸Α΍˴΢ϴ˶δϤ˴ ˸ϟ΍˴ϭ˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˶ϥϭ˵ΩϦ͋ϣΎ˱ΑΎ˴Α˸έ΃˴˸ϢϬ˵ ϧ˴ Ύ˴Β˸ϫέ˵ ϭ˴ ˸Ϣϫ˵ έ˴ Ύ˴Β˸Σ΃˴˸΍ϭ˵άΨ

˸Ϣϫ˵ ϭ˴ ˶Ϟ˸ϴϠ͉ϟ΍˯Ύ˴ϧ΁˶ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˶ΕΎ˴ϳ΁˴ϥϮ˵Ϡ˸Θϳ˴ ˲ΔϤ˴ ΋˶ ΂˴ϗ˲Δϣ͉ ΃˵˶ΏΎ˴ΘϜ˶ ˸ϟ΍˶Ϟ˸ϫ΃˴˸Ϧϣ͋ ˯΍˴Ϯγ

Shaykh ’Uthaymeen (raheemahullaah) transmitted from Ibn Taymiyyah

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

ͼϥ˴ Ϯ˵Ϙγ˶ Ύ˴ϔ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

Then Aboo Baseer says,

And Allaah says,

  ' 

Aboo Baseer says,

˲ϝ΍˴Ϯ˸ϣ΃˴ϭ˴ ˸ϢϜ˵ Η˵ ή˴ ϴ˶θϋ

And Allaah says,

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

{al-Maa’idah (5): 50}

Then Aboo Baseer says

ͼϪ˶ Α˶ ˸΍ϭ˵ήϔ˵ ˸Ϝϳ˴ ϥ˴΃˸΍ϭ˵ήϣ˶ ΃˵˸Ϊϗ˴ ϭ˴ ˶ΕϮ˵ϏΎ͉τϟ΍ϰ˴ϟ·˶˸΍Ϯ˵Ϥϛ˴ Ύ˴ΤΘ˴ ϳ˴ ϥ˴΃˴ϥϭ˵Ϊϳ˶ήϳ˵ ͽ

Then Aboo Baseer says,

ͼϪ˶ Α˶ ˸΍ϭ˵ήϔ˵ ˸Ϝϳ˴ ϥ˴΃˸΍ϭ˵ήϣ˶ ΃˵˸Ϊϗ˴ ϭ˴ ͽ

This speech of Shaykh Muhammad bin ’AbdulWahhab (raheemahullaah) testifies

27+(5 (55256 ,1 7+( ,668( 2) 58/,1* %< 27+(5

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

Meaning: even in one issue that he rejected or declared lawful, then he is a

Firstly, there is no difference between ruling in one issue on ten, a hundred,

B8    ' D 

  WDGOHHV   G DW7DDJKRRW+E1

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ˴΃Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

ͼϥ˴ ϭ˵ήϓ˶ Ύ˴Ϝ˸ϟ΍˵Ϣϫ˵ ˴ϚΌ˶ ˰˴ϟ˸ϭ΄˵ϓ˴ ˵ϪϠ˷ϟ΍˴ϝΰ˴ ϧ΃˴Ύ˴ϤΑ˶ Ϣ˵Ϝ˸Τϳ˴ ˸Ϣϟ͉Ϧ˴ϣϭ˴ ͽ

The Shaykh was also asked:

If he permitted it then he is considered a disbeliever who has committed

#ZKRVHXSSHUDUPVZRXOGEHOLNHDZRPDQ

+%

('(#&5((&Q& + )DWDDZDD

!! 9# ' (

VKLUN C

'

B8 ' D

WDGOHHV G DW7DDJKRRW+E1

)XQGDPHQWDOVRI7DNILU+S((<" 3,Q@@@=+@?J

0)HH'KLODDOLO4XU¶DDQ<"F=D+M+BJAJ

M)+D+B+AMJD+1+BBB

B$O¶$GDDODKDO,MWLPDD¶L\\DK > *+B?)HH'KLODDOLO4XU¶DDQD+0+??@