Designation: D 4169 05

Standard Practice for

Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems1

This standard is issued under the xed designation D 4169; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.

1. Scope 1.1 This practice provides a uniform basis of evaluating, in a laboratory, the ability of shipping units to withstand the distribution environment. This is accomplished by subjecting them to a test plan consisting of a sequence of anticipated hazard elements encountered in various distribution cycles. This practice is not intended to supplant material specications or existing preshipment test procedures. 1.2 The suitability of this practice for use with hazardous materials has not been determined. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specic precautionary statements are given in 1.1. 2. Referenced Documents 2.1 ASTM Standards: 2 D 642 Test Method for Determining Compressive Resistance of Shipping Containers, Components, and Unit Loads D 880 Test Method for Impact Testing for Shipping Containers and Systems D 951 Test Method for Water Resistance of Shipping Containers by Spray Method D 996 Terminology of Packaging and Distribution Environments D 999 Test Methods for Vibration Testing of Shipping Containers D 4003 Methods of Programmable Horizontal Impact Test for Shipping Containers and Systems
1 This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D10 on Packaging and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D10.21 on Shipping Containers and Systems-Application of Performance Test Methods. Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2005. Published November 2005. Originally approved in 2004. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as D 4169 04a. 2 For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at [email protected]. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page on the ASTM website.

D 4332 Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or Packaging Components for Testing D 4728 Test Method for Random Vibration Testing of Shipping Containers D 5276 Test Method for Drop Test of Loaded Containers by Free Fall D 5277 Test Method for Performing Programmed Horizontal Impacts Using an Inclined Impact Tester D 5487 Test Method for Simulated Drop of Loaded Containers by Shock Machines D 6055 Test Methods for Mechanical Handling of Unitized Loads and Large Shipping Cases and Crates D 6179 Test Methods for Rough Handling of Unitized Loads and Large Shipping Cases and Crates D 6653 Test Methods for Determining the Effects of High Altitude on Packaging Systems by Vacuum Method F 1327 Terminology Relating to Barrier Materials for Medical Packaging 2.2 Military Standards:3 MIL-STD-2073-1 DOD Standard Practice for Military Packaging 3. Terminology 3.1 DenitionsGeneral denitions for the packaging and distribution environments are found in Terminology D 996. 3.2 Denitions of Terms Specic to This Standard: 3.2.1 acceptance criteriathe acceptable quality level that must be met after the shipping unit has been subjected to the test plan. See Section 7. 3.2.2 assurance levelthe level of test intensity based on its probability of occurring in a typical distribution cycle. 3.2.2.1 DiscussionLevel I is a high level of test intensity and has a low probability of occurrence. Level III is a low level of test intensity, but has a correspondingly high probability of occurrence. Level II is between these extremes. For Distribution Cycle 18, DC-18 see MILSTD20731 for denitions of military levels of protection.

3 Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, Bldg. 4 Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Attn: NPODS.

Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.

D 4169 05
3.2.3 coeffcient of restitutionthe ratio of the rebound velocity to the impact velocity. 3.2.4 distribution cycle (DC)the sequential listing of the test schedules employed to simulate the hazard elements expected to occur for a specic routing of a shipping unit from production to consumption. See Table 1. 3.2.5 feeder aircraftsmall, potentially non-pressurized aircraft used to transport express packages. 3.2.6 hazard elementa specic event that occurs in a distribution cycle that may pose a hazard to a shipping unit. The element will usually be simulated by a single test schedule. See Section 9. 3.2.7 shipping unitthe smallest complete unit that will be subjected to the distribution environment, for example, a shipping container and its contents. 3.2.7.1 small shipping unitfor DC-18, a small shipping unit is dened as one having no edge dimension or diameter over 60 in. (1.52 m) and a gross weight of 150 lb (68 kg) or less. 3.2.7.2 large shipping unitfor DC-18, a large shipping unit is dened as one having at least one edge dimension or diameter over 60 in. (1.52 m) or a gross weight in excess of 150 lb (68 kg), or it is one that has a gross weight exceeding 100 lb (45 kg) and is secured to a base or to the base of a shipping unit. 3.2.8 test plana specic listing of the test sequence to be followed to simulate the hazards anticipated during the distribution cycle of a shipping unit. Included will be the test intensity and number of sequential tests to be conducted. See 8.5. 3.2.9 test schedulethe specic procedure to be used, including the three assurance level intensities, and a reference to the test method that is the basis of the schedule. 3.2.9.1 DiscussionThe purpose of the schedule is to simulate the forces occurring during any hazard element of the distribution cycle. See Section 9. 3.2.10 total velocity change, (DV)the sum of the impact and rebound velocities. 3.3 Abbreviations:Abbreviations: 3.3.1 TOFCtrailer on atcar. 3.3.2 COFCcontainer on atcar. 3.3.3 TLtruckload. 3.3.4 CLcarload. 3.3.5 LTLless than truckload. 4. Signicance and Use 4.1 This practice provides a guide for the evaluation of shipping units in accordance with a uniform system, using established test methods at levels representative of those occurring in actual distribution. The recommended test levels are based on available information on the shipping and handling environment, and current industry/government practice and experience (1-13).4 The tests should be performed sequentially on the same containers in the order given. For use as a performance test, this practice requires that the shipping unit tested remain unopened until the sequence of tests are completed. If used for other purposes, such as package development, it may be useful to open and inspect shipping units at various times throughout the sequence. This may, however, prohibit evaluating the inuence of the container closure on container performance. 4.2 For Distribution Cycle 18, as referred to in MILSTD20731, the use of this practice is dened in subsequent sections identied as DC-18. 5. Test Specimen 5.1 Test specimens consist of representative samples of complete shipping units, including actual contents. Products with blemishes or minor defects may be used if the defective component is not to be studied by the test and if the defect is documented in the report. Dummy test loads are acceptable if testing the actual product might be hazardous. If a dummy load is used, it should be instrumented to determine if the fragility level of the actual product has been exceeded. Take care to duplicate the load characteristics of the actual product, and avoid unnecessary prehandling. 5.2 Care must be taken to ensure that no degradation has occurred to either the product or the package if the test packages have been shipped to the test site. If any doubt exists as to the condition of the package, repack the product in new packaging material before testing. 5.3 The number of test replications depends on the desired objectives of the testing and the availability of duplicate products and shipping containers. Replicate testing is recommended to improve the reliability of the test results. 6. Conditioning 6.1 If the distribution cycle contains climatic conditions that have an effect on the performance characteristics of the product, shipping container, or components such as cushioning, use one of the following procedures. (It should be noted that different atmospheric conditions are likely to exist between the origin and destination points of a distribution cycle, particularly for export/import cycles.): 6.1.1 Conduct the test at standard conditions and compensate for the effects of any climatic condition. Condition the shipping units to a standard atmosphere of 73.4 6 2F (23 6 1C) and 50 6 2 % relative humidity. Condition berboard containers in accordance with Practice D 4332. The same atmospheric condition should be used for any assurance level. A conditioning period of 72 h, or sufficient time to reach equilibrium of all parts of the package and product is recommended. Tests should be conducted in the conditioned atmosphere whenever possible. If not possible, conduct the tests as soon after removal from the conditioning atmosphere as practicable. Recondition the shipping units to the standard atmosphere as necessary during the test plan. 6.1.2 In some circumstances, it may be necessary to conduct some or all of the tests at special climatic conditions, such as those given in Practice D 4332, or Test Method D 951, or others (salt, spray, water immersion, humidity, or temperature). The same climatic condition should be used for any assurance level. A conditioning period of 72 h, or sufficient time to reach
2

4 The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end of this practice.

D 4169 05
TABLE 1 Distribution Cycles
Performance Test Schedule Sequence (see Section 9 for Test Schedule denition) Second Third Fourth Fifth Schedule D Stacked Vibration Schedule F Schedule G Schedule A Loose-Load Rail Switching Handling Vibration

DC 1

Distribution Cycle General Cycleundened distribution system

First Schedule A Handling

Sixth

2 3

Specially dened distribution system, user specied (see Appendix X2) Single package environment, up to 100 lb (45.4 kg) Schedule A Handling

select from Schedules A through I Schedule C Vehicle Stacking Schedule C Vehicle Stacking Schedule D Stacked Vibration Schedule D Stacked Vibration Schedule F Loose-Load Vibration Schedule F Loose-Load Vibration Schedule E Vehicle Vibration Schedule A Handling Schedule E Vehicle Vibration Schedule E Vehicle Vibration Schedule A Handling Schedule A Handling ...

Motor freight, single package over 100 lb (45.4 kg)

Schedule A Handling

Schedule A Handling

...

Motor freight, TL, not unitized

Schedule A Handling

...

...

Motor freight, TL, or LTLunitized

Schedule A Handling

Schedule B Warehouse Stacking

...

...

Rail only, bulk loaded

Schedule A Handling

Schedule D Schedule G Schedule A Stacked Rail Switching Handling Vibration Schedule D Schedule G Schedule A Stacked Rail Switching Handling Vibration Schedule C Vehicle Stacking

...

...

Rail only, unitized

Schedule A Handling

Schedule B Warehouse Stacking

...

Rail and motor freight, not unitized

Schedule A Handling

Schedule E Schedule G Schedule F Vehicle Rail Switching Loose-Load Vibration Vibration Schedule B Warehouse Stacking Schedule A Handling

Schedule A Handling

10

Rail and motor freight, unitized

Schedule A Handling

Schedule D Schedule G Schedule A Stacked Rail Switching Handling Vibration Schedule F Loose-Load Vibration

...

11

Rail, TOFC and COFC

Schedule A Schedule G Schedule D Handling Rail Switching Stacked Vibration Schedule A Handling

...

12

Air (intercity) and motor freight (local), over 100 lb (45.4 kg), unitized

Schedule E Schedule D Schedule I Vehicle Stacked Low PresureA Vibration Vibration Schedule C Vehicle Stacking Schedule B Warehouse Stacking Schedule C Vehicle Stacking Schedule C Vehicle Stacking Schedule C Vehicle Stacking Schedule B or Schedule CB Schedule F Loose-Load Vibration ... Schedule I Low PressureA ...

Schedule A Handling

...

13

Air (intercity) and motor freight (local, single package up to 100 lb (45.4 kg)

Schedule A Handling

Schedule E Vehicle Vibration ...

Schedule A Handling

14

Warehousing (partial cycle to be added to other cycles as needed)

Schedule A Handling

...

15

Export/Import shipment for intermodal container or roll on/roll off trailer (partial cycle to be added to other cycles as needed)

Schedule A Handling

Schedule A Handling

...

...

...

16

Export/Import shipment for palletized cargo ship (partial cycle to be added to other cycles as needed)

Schedule A Handling

Schedule A Handling

...

...

...

17

Export/Import shipment for break bulk cargo ship (partial cycle to be added to other cycles as needed)

Schedule A Handling

Schedule A Handling

...

...

...

18

Non-Commercial Government shipments per MIL-STD-2073-1

Schedule A Handling

Schedule H Schedule F Schedule A Environmental Loose-Load Handling Hazard Vibration

Schedule A Handling

A This high altitude, non-pressurized transport simulation test may be deleted from this distribution cycle when testing shipping units contain primary packages that have a porous material. B For DC-18, perform the stacking test that results in the highest computed load value.

D 4169 05
equilibrium of all parts of the package and product is recommended. Tests should be conducted in the conditioned atmosphere whenever possible. If not possible, conduct the tests as soon after removal from the conditioning atmosphere as practicable. Recondition the shipping units as necessary during the test plan. For atmospheres other than the Standard Conditioning Atmosphere, the user must determine the appropriate compressive load factor for warehouse and vehicle stacking, as the factors given in 11.2 are based on testing under the Standard test atmosphere. 7. Acceptance Criteria 7.1 Acceptance criteria must be established prior to testing and should consider the required condition of the product at receipt. The organizations conducting the test may choose any acceptance criteria suitable for their purpose. It is advisable to compare the type and quantity of damage that occurred to the test specimens with the damage that occurs during actual distribution and handling or with test results of similar containers whose shipping history is known. 7.2 In many cases, the acceptance criteria can be the following: Criterion 1Product is damagefree. Criterion 2Package is intact. Criterion 3Both criteria 1 and 2. Often, this means that the shipping container and its contents are suitable for normal sale and use at the completion of the test cycle. Detailed acceptance criteria may allow for accepting specied damage to a product or its package. The form and content of acceptance criteria may vary widely, in accordance with the particular situation. Methods may range from simple passfail judgments to highly quantitative scoring or analysis systems. 8. Procedure 8.1 Dene Shipping UnitDescribe shipping unit in terms of size, weight, and form of construction. See 3.2.6. Determine whether the container will be manually or mechanically handled. 8.2 Establish Assurance LevelSpecify a level of test intensity. The level should be one of three preestablished assurance levels. This must be preestablished based on the product value, the desired level of anticipated damage that can be tolerated, the number of units to be shipped, knowledge of the shipping environment, or other criteria. Assurance Level II is suggested unless conditions dictate otherwise. Assurance Level I provides a more severe test than II. Assurance Level III provides a less severe test than II. The assurance level may be varied between schedules (see Sections 10-15) if such variations are known to occur. The test levels used should be reported. See Section 17. 8.3 Determine Acceptance CriteriaAcceptance criteria are related to the desired condition of the product and package at the end of the distribution cycle. See Section 7. 8.4 Select Distribution CycleSelect a Distribution Cycle from the available standard distribution cycles compiled in Table 1. Use the DC that most closely correlates with the projected distribution. When the distribution is undened, the general distribution cycle DC1 should be selected. When the
4

anticipated distribution is well understood, a special distribution cycle DC2 may be specied. In using DC2, the user selects test schedules from Section 9 and species the test sequence (see Appendix X2 for more details). 8.5 Write Test PlanPrepare a test plan by using the sequence presented in Table 1 for the distribution cycle selected. Obtain the test intensities from the referenced schedules. The test plan intensity details must take into account the assurance levels selected as well as the physical description of the shipping unit. Table 1 thus leads to a detailed test plan consisting of the exact sequence in which the shipping unit will be subjected to the test inputs. The test schedules associated with each element reference the existing ASTM test methods for clarication of the equipment and techniques to be used to conduct the test. 8.5.1 Sample test plans are provided in Appendix X1. 8.6 Select Samples for TestSee Section 5. 8.7 Condition SamplesSee Section 6. 8.8 Perform Tests Perform tests as directed in reference ASTM standards and as further modied in the special instructions for each test schedule. 8.9 Evaluate Results Evaluate results to determine if the shipping units meet the acceptance criteria. See Section 7. 8.10 Document Test ResultsDocument test results by reporting each step. See Section 17. 8.11 Monitor ShipmentsWhen possible, obtain feedback by monitoring shipments of the container that was tested to ensure that the type and quantity of damage obtained by the laboratory testing correlates with the damage that occurs in the distribution cycle. This information is very useful for the planning of subsequent tests of similar shipping containers. 9. Hazard Elements and Test Schedules 9.1 Hazard Elements and Test Schedules are categorized as follows:
Schedule A B C D E F G H I Hazard Element Handling - manual and mechanical Warehouse Stacking Vehicle Stacking Stacked Vibration Vehicle Vibration Loose Load Vibration Rail Switching Environmental Hazard Low Pressure Hazard Test Section 10 drop, impact, stability compression 11 compression 11 vibration 12 vibration 12 repetitive shock 13 longitudinal shock 14 cyclic exposure 15 vacuum 16

10. Schedule AHandlingManual and Mechanical 10.1 There are two types of handling hazard element, manual and mechanical. The manual handling test should be used for single containers, small parcels, and any shipping container that can be handled manually, up to a weight of 200 lb (90.7 kg). Mechanical handling should be used for unitized loads, large cases and crates, and any shipping container or system that will be handled by mechanical means. Manual and mechanical handling are described further in 10.2 and 10.3. 10.2 Manual HandlingThe test levels and the test method for this schedule of the distribution cycle are intended to determine the ability of the shipping unit to withstand the hazards occurring during manual handlings, such as loading, unloading, stacking, sorting, or palletizing. The main hazards from these operations are the impacts caused by dropping or

D 4169 05
throwing. Size, weight, and shape of the shipping unit will affect the intensity of these hazards. Two test method options are permitted, free fall and simulated drop test using shock machines. While the two methods produce similar results, the shock machine method produces more control of orientations of impact; see Test Method D 5487 for limitations of the shock machine method. 10.2.1 For purposes of this procedure, the bottom of a small parcel is the surface on which the parcel rests in its most stable orientation. 10.2.2 Mechanical handling (10.3) may be used when it is anticipated that handling will be by mechanical means only. 10.2.3 Recommended drop heights, the number of drops, the sequence of drops, and the shipping unit orientation at impact are as follows: Test Method D 5276, D 5487. ConditioningSee Section 6.
Shipping Weight, lb (kg) 0 to 20 (0 to 9.1) 20 to 40 (9.1 to 18.1) 40 to 60 (18.1 to 27.2) 60 to 80 (27.2 to 36.3) 80 to 100 (36.3 to 45.4) 100 to 200 (45.4 to 90.7) Number of Impacts at Specied Height Drop Height, in. (mm) Assurance Level I II III 24 (610) 15 (381) 9 (229) 21 (533) 13 (330) 8 (203) 18 (457) 12 (305) 7 (178) 15 (381) 10 (254) 6 (152) 12 (305) 9 (229) 5 (127) 10 (254) 7 (178) 4 (102) Shipping Weight, lb (kg) 0 to 30 (0 to 13.6) over 30 to 75 (to 34) over 75 to 150 (to 68) Drop Height, in. (mm) Assurance Level I II 30 (762) 24 (610) 24 (610) 18 (457) 18 (457) 15 (381)

10.3 Mechanical HandlingThe test levels and the test method for this schedule of the distribution cycle are intended to determine the ability of large and heavy shipping units and unitized loads to withstand the mechanical handling hazards that occur during loading, unloading, sorting, or stacking. Different test methods are used for large shipping cases and crates versus unit loads. For various types of unit loads, test methods also vary, depending on the method of truck handling: fork, clamp, spade, or pull/pack. 10.3.1 Large Shipping Cases and CratesPerform the following test sequences: Test MethodD 6179, D 880, D 4003. ConditioningSee Section 6. 10.3.1.1 Fork Lift Truck HandlingOne rotational at drop from each opposite base edge in accordance with Method C of Test Methods D 6179 and one rotational drop on each of two diagonally opposite base corners in accordance with Method B of Test Methods D 6179.
Gross Weight, lb (kg) 0 to 500 (0 to 226.8) Over 500 (226.8) Drop Height, in. (mm) Assurance Level I II III 12 (305) 9 (229) 6 (152) 9 (229) 6 (152) 3 (076)

One Two Two One Number of Impacts at Specied Height

Impact Orientation First Sequence of Distribution Cycle Box Bag or Sack Cylindrical Container top face top adjacent bottom edges two sides two sides 90 apart diagonally opposite bottom both ends bottom edges 90 apart corners bottom opposite face bottom

One Two Two One

Impact Orientation Second Sequence of Distribution Cycle Box Bag or Sack Cylindrical Container vertical edge face top adjacent side faces two sides two sides 90 apart one top corner and one both ends bottom edges 90 apart adjacent top edge see Note 1 see Note 1 see Note 1

10.3.1.2 Crane HandlingOne drop at on bottom and one drop on base edge in accordance with Method D of Test Methods D 6179. Use the same drop heights versus shipping unit weight as in 10.3.1.1. 10.3.1.3 Side Impact TestImpact all four sides of the shipping unit in accordance with Test Method D 880, Procedure B. Alternately, use Test Method D 4003 Method B using a short duration programmer, assuming the coefficient of restitution is 0.0 and the total velocity change is equivalent to the specied impact velocity.
Assurance Level I II III Impact Velocity ft/s(m/s) 5.75(1.75) 4.0(1.22) 3.0(0.91)

NOTE 1On the last impact of the last manual handling sequence in a distribution cycle, the impact should be made at twice the specied height or equivalent velocity change. (This is the nal (sixth) drop in the sequence, not an additional drop.) The drop should be in the impact orientation most likely for a drop to occur, usually the largest face or the bottom. For distribution cycles where any drop orientation is possible (that is, smallparcel environment), this drop should be in the most critical or damageprone orientation, as dened in Test Method D 5276. NOTE 2The equivalent velocity change corresponding to the specied drop height used for the shock machine method shall be calculated as specied in Test Method D 5487.

10.2.4 DC-18Description of this schedule is in accordance with 10.2.3, except that the height of the last impact of the last manual handling sequence is the same as all other impacts (ignore Note 1). Use the rst sequence impact orientations for the third handling schedule in DC18. Use Mechanical Handling (10.3) for large shipping units (see 3.2.7.2). Test small shipping units (see 3.2.7.1) using the following test levels:
5

10.3.1.4 Tip TestIn accordance with Method F of Test Methods D 6179. 10.3.1.5 Tipover TestIn accordance with Method G of Test Methods D 6179. 10.3.2 Unitized LoadsPerform the following tests sequences as appropriate for the method of truck handling: Test MethodD 880, D 4003, D 6055, D 6179. ConditioningSee Section 6. 10.3.2.1 All Methods of Truck HandlingPick up, transport around test course, and set down in accordance with Test Methods 6055, Method A for fork lift, Method B for spade lift, Method C for clamp, and Method D for pull pack.
Assurance Level I II III Cycles (Round Trips) 8 5 3

10.3.2.2 All Methods of Truck HandlingImpact all four sides of the shipping unit in accordance with Test Method D 880 Procedure B. Alternately, use Test Method D 4003

D 4169 05
Method B using a short duration programmer, assuming the coefficient of restitution is 0.0 and the total velocity change is equivalent to the specied impact velocity.
Assurance Level I II III Impact Velocity ft/s(m/s) 5.75(1.75) 4.0(1.22) 3.0(0.91)

10.3.2.3 Fork Lift Truck HandlingOne rotational at drop from each opposite base edge in accordance with Method C of Test Methods D 6179.
Gross Weight, lb (kg) 0 to 500 (0 to 226.8) Over 500 (226.8) Drop Height, in. (mm) Assurance Level I II III 12 (305) 9 (229) 6 (152) 9 (229) 6 (152) 3 (76)

10.3.3 DC18For large shipping units, this schedule is intended to provide a number of testing variations describing specic mechanical handling hazards that occur in government distribution for shipping cases, crates, unitized loads, and cylindrical containers. Required tests for rectangular shipping units include: tip/tipover; fork lift truck transport; rotational drops, both edgewise and cornerwise; and lateral impacts. For Assurance Level I, shipping cases and crates and unitized loads shall also be subjected to sling handling, and shipping cases and crates shall be subjected to grabhook handling. For cylindrical shipping units, only rotational edgewise drop tests shall apply. Table 2 shall be used as a guide in determining both the required tests and the sequence to be followed. 10.3.3.1 Tests specic to government shipments include the following: (1) Shipping Cases, Crates, and Unitized LoadsTip/ TipoverShipping cases and crates shall be subjected to both tip and tipover tests for Assurance Level I, following the requirements of Test Method D 6179 Methods F and G. For unitized loads, only the tip test will be required. The tip test shall be performed for Assurance Level II for all rectangular shipping units. Tip/tipover requirements shall only be required during the rst handling sequence of DC18. The tip test is useful for determining acceptable shipping unit dimension and center of gravity. For tipover, one impact is required on each of two opposite sides, as determined by the initial side having the lowest heighttowidth ratio. (2) Shipping Cases, Crates, and Unitized LoadsFork Lift Truck TransportPick up, transport around test course as dened in Test Methods D 6055 Method A, for a total of two cycles

(round trips) in the case of Assurance Level I, and one cycle for Assurance Level II. Within the minimum 100 ft (30.5 m) obstacle zone, parallel pairs of 1 by 6 in. (25 by 150 mm) boards, of a length to extend completely across the aisle and spaced 54 in. (1.37 m) apart, are laid at at intervals of 30, 60, and 90 ft (9.1, 18.3, and 27.4 m). Board angles to the trucks path shall be 90, 60, and 75 degrees respectively, with the left wheel striking rst over the second obstacle (board pairs) and the right wheel rst over the third. (3) Shipping Cases, Crates, Unitized Loads and Cylindrical ContainersRotational DropsFor edge drops, use Method A of Test Methods D 6179 with a 6 in. (150 mm) height timber edge support. In the case of rectangular shipping units, drops are made on each opposite edge of the units base, for a total of four impacts. For cylindrical shipping units, drops shall be made with the unit on its side, such that impacts occur on top and bottom rims at diagonally opposite quadrants. Care must be taken to prevent the container from rolling on the support. Additional impacts shall be made in the same manner in different quadrants separated by an approximate 90, for a total of four drops. For corner drops, use Method B of Test Methods D 6179, except that one corner of the shipping unit base shall be supported on a 6 in. (150 mm) height block while the other corner on the same end or side rests on a 12 in. (300 mm) height block. Each corner will be impacted, for a total of four drops. Both edgewise and cornerwise drops shall be performed on large rectangular shipping units. For all rotational drops, test with the lowest drop height indicated by either gross weight or maximum dimension, using the following test levels:
Gross Weight, lb (kg) or Maximum Dimension, in (mm) over 150 to 250 (68 to 113) or over 60 to 66 (1524 to 1676) over 250 to 500 (to 227) or over 66 to 78 (to 1981) over 500 to 1000 (to 454) or over 78 to 90 (to 2286) over 1000 (over 454) or over 90 (2286) Drop Height, in. (mm) Assurance Level I II 30 (762) 24 (610) 24 (610) 18 (457) 12 (305) 18 (457) 12 (305) 9 (229)

(4) Shipping Cases, Crates, and Unitized LoadsLateral ImpactsNote that this test is to be performed only during the second handling sequence of Distribution Cycle 18. Testing shall be in accordance with Test Method D 880, Procedure B. Alternately, testing may be in accordance with Test Method

TABLE 2 Mechanical Handling for DC18, Required Tests and Sequence

Large Shipping Unit Shipping Cases & Crates Unitized Loads Assurance LevelA TipB TipoverB Forklift Transport Rotational Drops Edge I II I II I II X X X X X 2 cycles 1 cycle 2 cycles 1 cycle X X X X X X Corner X X X X X X X X X Lateral ImpactsC Grabhook HandlingD Sling HandlingD

Cylindrical
A B

As referenced in 3.2.2, Assurance Levels I and II equate to military levels of protection A and B, respectively. Test to be performed only during the rst handling sequence of DC-18. C Test to be performed only during the second handling sequence of DC-18. D Test to be performed only during the third handling sequence of DC-18.

D 4169 05
D 4003, Method B, using a short duration programmer, assuming the coefficient of restitution is 0.0 and the total velocity change is equivalent to the specied impact velocity. Selection of apparatus, as dened within these test methods, shall also be at the option of the package designer/contractor. As a requirement for Assurance Level I, the impact velocity shall be 7.3 ft/s(2.23 m/s). One lateral impact shall be performed on each side (including ends) surface having a dimension less than 9.5 ft (2.9 m). A 4 by 4 in. (100 by 100 mm) timber, placed so as to contact the lower edge of the shipping unit, shall be used as an impacting hazard when evaluating unitized loads and demountable shipping cases. (5) Shipping Cases, Crates, and Unitized LoadsGrabhook/ Sling HandlingTest shipping cases and crates for grabhook handling, in accordance with Method E of Test Methods D 6055, only for Assurance Level I. Test shipping cases, crates, and unitized loads for sling handling, per Method F of Test Methods D 6055, only for Assurance Level I. Note that this test is performed only during the third handling sequence of DC18. 11. Schedule B - Warehouse Stacking and Schedule CVehicle Stacking 11.1 The test levels and the test methods for these schedules of a distribution cycle are intended to determine the ability of the shipping unit to withstand the compressive loads that occur during warehouse storage or vehicle transport. The required loading must consider the effects of length of time in storage, the alignment or stacking pattern of the container, variability in container strength, moisture content, temperature, previous handling and transportation, method of load support, and vibration. The minimum required loads for typical shipping units which include the combined effects of the above factors are recommended below for Schedule BWarehouse Stacking and Schedule CVehicle Stacking (select test levels for either warehouse or vehicle stacking as dened in the distribution cycle): Test Method D 642. Conditioning73.4 6 2F (23 6 1C), 50 6 2 % relative humidity in accordance with Practice D 4332. 11.2 Use the following test levels:
F Factors Assurance Level Schedule Schedule BWarehouse CVehicle Shipping Unit Construction I II III I II III 1. Corrugated, berboard, or plastic container 8.0 4.5 3.0 10.0 7.0 5.0 that may or may not have stressbearing interior packaging using these materials, and where the product does not support any of the load. 2. Corrugated, berboard, or plastic container 4.5 3.0 2.0 6.0 4.5 3.0 that has stress-bearing interior packaging with rigid inserts such as wood. 3. Containers constructed of materials other 3.0 2.0 1.5 4.0 3.0 2.0 than corrugated, berboard, or plastic that are not temperature or humidity sensitive or where the product supports the load directly, for example, compression package. 4. If the product supports a known portion of the load, the F factor is calculated in the following manner:

F 5 P~Fp! 1 C~F c!

(1)

where: Fp = factor given above for compression package (construction Type 3), P = fraction of load supported by product, Fc = factor given above for appropriate container construction, and C = fraction of load supported by container. If a full pallet load is tested, F factors may be reduced by 30 %. 11.3 For warehouse stacking and vehicle stacking made up of identical shipping units, load the shipping unit to the computed load value, as calculated below. Remove the load within 3 s after reaching the specied value.
L5M3J Hh h 3F (2)

where: L = computed load, lbf or N, M = mass of one shipping unit or individual container, lb or kg, J = 1 lbf/lb or 9.8 N/kg, H = maximum height of stack in storage or transit vehicle (if vehicle stack height is unknown, use 108 in.(2.7 m)), in. or m, h = height of shipping unit or individual container, in. or m, and F = a factor to account for the combined effect of the individual factors described above. 11.4 For vehicle stacking made up of mixed commodities and shipped in an LTL or small package delivery environment, load the shipping unit to the computed load value, as calculated below. Remove the load within 3 s after reaching the specied value. If the average shipping density factor (Mf) for the specic distribution system is not known, use a value of 10 3 lb/ft (160 kg/m3).
L 5 Mf 3 J l3w3h Hh 3 h 3F K (3)

where: L = Mf = J = H = h l w K = = = =

computed load, lbf or N, shipping density factor, lb/ft3 or kg/m3, 1 lbf/lb or 9.8 N/kg, maximum height of stack in transit vehicle (if vehicle stack height is unknown, use 108 in.(2.7 m)), in. or m, see Note 3, height of shipping unit or individual container, in. or m, length of shipping unit or individual container, in. or m, width of shipping unit or individual container, in. or m, 1728 in.3/ft3 or 1 m3/m3, and

D 4169 05
F = a factor to account for the combined effect of the individual factors described above.
2 50 90 200 Overall, g rms Duration, minB Air: Power Spectral Density Level, g2/Hz Assurance Level Assurance Level Assurance Level I II III 0.0004 0.0002 0.0001 0.02 0.01 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.005 0.00002 0.00001 0.000005 1.49 1.05 0.74 180 180 180 0.002 0.002 0.0008 0.00002 0.41 180 0.001 0.001 0.0004 0.00001 0.29 180 0.0005 0.0005 0.0002 0.000005 0.20 180

NOTE 3The value for H, when unknown, is reduced to 54 in.(1.4 m) from 108 in.(2.7 m) for packages under 30 lb(13.6 kg) and 2.0 ft3(0.056 m3) or less in size when applied to a vehicle stacking hazard element in LTL shipments.

12. Schedule D - Stacked Vibration and Schedule E Vehicle Vibration 12.1 The test levels and test methods for these schedules of the distribution cycle are intended to determine the ability of shipping units to withstand the vertical vibration environment during transport, and the dynamic compression forces resulting from vehicle stacking. The test levels and methods account for the magnitude, frequency range, duration, and direction of vibration. Select a Schedule Dstacked vibration or Schedule Evehicle vibration (no stacking) test as dened by the distribution cycle. Two test method options are permitted, sine and random. The two methods are not equivalent; they will not necessarily produce the same results. The random test method results in a better simulation of actual transport vibration environments, and is the preferred method for qualication. The sine test method is often used in conjunction with the random method as a means of determining and observing system resonances. 12.2 Schedule DStacked VibrationPerform the test along the vertical axis with the load in the normal shipping orientation. It is permissible to use a concentrated dead load to simulate an upper unit load or mixed commodities. The concentrated load may be calculated from the formulas in 11.3 and 11.4, with the F factor set equal to 1. Recommended intensities and durations for the random tests are given in 12.4, and those for sine tests are given in 12.5 12.3 Schedule E-Vehicle VibrationPerform the test for each possible shipping orientation. Recommended intensities and durations for the random tests are given in 12.4, and those for sine tests are given in 12.5. 12.4 Random Test Option:
Test Method D 4728, Method A or B.A ConditioningSee Section 6. Special InstructionsThe following power spectral densities, as dened by their mode of transport, frequency and amplitude breakpoints, and test durations are recommended. The Truck test is recommended for Distribution Cycles 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The Rail test is recommended for Distribution Cycles 7, 8 and 11. A 60 min Truck test followed by a 120 min Rail test is recommended for Distribution Cycles 9 and 10. A 60 min Truck test followed by a 120 min Air test is recommended for Distribution Cycles 12 and 13. Truck: Power Spectral Density Level, g2/Hz Assurance Level Assurance Level Assurance Level Frequency, Hz I II III 1 0.0001 0.00005 0.000025 4 0.02 0.01 0.005 16 0.02 0.01 0.005 40 0.002 0.001 0.0005 80 0.002 0.001 0.0005 200 0.00002 0.00001 0.000005 Overall, g rms 0.73 0.52 0.37 B Duration, min 180 180 180 Rail: Power Spectral Density Level, g2/Hz Assurance Level Assurance Level Assurance Level I II III 0.00002 0.00001 0.000005

Frequency, Hz 2 12 100 300 Overall, g rms Duration, minB

A If Method B is used, the drive signal must be equalized for the specic shaker and shipping unit dynamics per Test Method D 4728, Section 8. B For vehicle vibration tests in multiple shipping unit orientations, the total duration should be distributed evenly between the orientations tested.

12.4.1 If more detailed information is available on the transport vibration environment or the damage history of the shipping unit, it is recommended that the above procedure be modied to use such information. The average test time required to reproduce shipping damage is dependent on the mode of failure, as well as the vibration level. Some over-stress and abrasion modes of failure will occur in much less than 3 h, while some fatigue failure modes may require more than 3 h to occur. Test durations ranging from 30 min to 6 h have been used successfully for different product or package types. The recommended 180min duration is reasonable in the absence of specic shipping or testing experience. 12.5 Sine Test Option: Test Methods D 999, Method B or C. ConditioningSee Section 6. Special InstructionsDwell time is for each noted product or package resonance up to four discrete resonances. If more than four resonances are noted, test at the four frequencies where the greatest response is noted. In frequency sweeps it is advisable to consider the frequency ranges normally encountered in the type of transportation being considered. The resonant frequency(ies) may shift during test due to changing characteristics of the container system. It is suggested that the dwell frequency be varied slightly during the test to detect any shift and to continue testing at the frequency of maximum response. Use the following test levels:
Assurance Level I II III Frequency Range, Hz 3 to 100 3 to 100 3 to 100 Amplitude (O-Peak), g Rail Truck 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.5 Dwell Time, min 15 10 5

Frequency, Hz 1

13. Schedule F - Loose Load Vibration 13.1 The test levels and the test method for this schedule of the distribution cycle are intended to determine the ability of the shipping unit to withstand the repetitive shocks occurring during transportation of bulk or loose loads. The test levels and test method account for amplitude, direction, and duration of the repetitive shocks. 13.2 Use the following test levels: Test MethodD 999, Method A1 or A2. ConditioningSee Section 6.
8

D 4169 05
Special InstructionsDwell time distributed 50 % along normal vertical shipping axis and remaining 50 % evenly along all other possible shipping orientations
Assurance Level I II III Dwell Time, min 60 40 30

13.3 DC-18Description of this schedule is in accordance with 13.2, except that total dwell time for Assurance Levels I and II shall be 2 h if tested in one position, and 3 h if tested in more than one position. 14. Schedule G - Simulated Rail Switching 14.1 The test levels and test methods for this schedule are intended to determine the ability of the shipping unit to withstand the acceleration levels and compressive forces that might occur during rail switching operations. Test Method D 4003, Test Method A or Test Method D 5277. ConditioningSee Section 6. Special InstructionsThree impacts shall be performed. For railcars with standard draft gear, shock durations of 40 6 10 ms shall be used, as measured on the oor of the carriage. For railcars with longtravel draft gear, shock durations of 300 6 50 ms shall be used. Note that Test Method D 5277 is used for standard draft gear only. For purposes of this test, the coefficient of restitution shall be considered 0.0, and the total velocity change shall be equivalent to the specied impact velocity. Container impact surface should be the same as occurs in actual shipment. If more than one orientation is possible, impact that surface which is known to be most sensitive to damage. Refer to Test Methods D 4003 or D 5277 for specic instructions on how to instrument and conduct the test. 14.2 ProcedureLoad shipping unit on carriage against bulkhead. Total backload shall be equivalent to a minimum of 3 ft lineal (0.9 m) of cargo. The package used as backload in contact with the test package must be identical to the test package. 14.3 Test Levels Allow the carriage to impact a cushioned barrier in accordance with the following assurance levels:
Assurance Level I II III Number of Impacts 2 1 2 1 1 2 Impact Velocity mph (m/s) 8 (3.58) 6 (2.68) 6 (2.68) 4 (1.79) 6 (2.68) 4 (1.79)

the military distribution of material. This schedule determines the susceptibility of the total pack to the effects of moisture, temperature shock, or the combined effects of cyclic exposure. The result of conditioning may involve the observation/ measurement of moisture or water within packs, evidence of corrosion on packaged items, or compromise of the enclosures structural integrity such that physical protection can no longer be ensured. Testing shall be in accordance with Test Method D 951, where spray intensities of 4 + 1 in/h(100+25 mm/h) are used for Assurance Level I and 2 + 0.5 in/h(50 + 10 mm/h) for Level II. 15.2 Test levels shall be as follows:
Assurance Level Temperature, F (C) Water Spray Duration, h I 120 to 130 (49 to 54) 16 50 to 60 (10 to 15) X 2 10 to 0 (23 to 18) 2 120 to 130 (49 to 54) X 2 50 to 60 (10 to 15) X 2 35 to 50 (2 to 10) 16 120 to 130 (49 to 54) 4 50 to 60 (10 to 15) X 2 35 to 50 (2 to 10) 2 120 to 130 (49 to 54) 16 50 to 60 (10 to 15) X 2 10 to 0 (23 to 18) 2 35 to 50 (2 to 10) 3 120 to 130 (49 to 54) 16 II 120 to 130 (49 to 54) 16 50 to 60 (10 to 15) X 2 120 to 130 (49 to 54) 4 50 to 60 (10 to 15) X 2 The cyclic sequence shall be repeated on three consecutive days. At the end of the three day period, the unit pack being tested shall then set overnight 120 to 130 (49 to 54) 16 III Not applicable

15.3 When specied in the contract, this test should be performed as part of the complete distribution cycle for the smallest complete shipping unit, as part of the contract. 16. Schedule ILow Pressure (High Altitude) Hazard 16.1 This schedule is intended to provide for the anticipated reduction in pressure when packaged products are transported via certain modes of transport, such as feeder aircraft or by ground over mountain passes. This test shall be conducted in accordance with levels described in Test Method D 6653. This test should be included for products and packages that could be sensitive to a low pressure environment, for example, sealed exible non-porous packages, liquid containers, or porous packages that may be packed in such a manner as to be adversely affected by low pressure environments. This test may be deleted from DC 12 and 13 when testing shipping units contain primary packages that have a porous material (porous packaging material is dened in Terminology F 1327). 16.2 Test the packages to the expected altitude levels encountered during shipment. If these are not known precisely, use levels recommended by Test Method D 6653 of pressure equivalent to 4267 m (14 000 ft.) for a period of 60 min. The test duration and pressure levels may be modied based on knowledge of the shipping environment, product value, desired damage level acceptances, or other criteria as described in Test Method D 6653.

14.4 Procedure ModicationIf more detailed information is available on backload or shock characteristics it is recommended that the above procedure be modied to use such information. The specied backload and shock characteristic are intended to simulate the conditions that occur on rail cars equipped with standard type draft gear. 15. Schedule H - Environmental Hazard 15.1 This schedule is intended to provide for the anticipated and often rapid changes in ambient conditions associated with

D 4169 05
17. Report 17.1 Report fully all the steps taken. At a minimum, the report should include: 17.1.1 Reference to this practice, 17.1.2 Description of product and shipping unit, 17.1.3 Distribution cycle (DC) and test plan, 17.1.4 Assurance levels and rationale, 17.1.5 Number of samples tested, 17.1.6 Conditioning used, 17.1.7 Acceptance criteria, 17.1.8 Vibration option used, random or sine, 17.1.9 Random vibration power spectral density plot, if used, 17.1.10 Pressure levels and duration for high altitude exposure, if used. 17.1.11 Variation from recommended procedures, and 17.1.12 Condition of specimens after test. 17.2 Government ShipmentsIn addition to 17.1.2-17.1.12, the complete report includes: 17.2.1 Party, other than contractor, performing testing, 17.2.2 Testing facility used, other than contractors, 17.2.3 Government representative witnessing testing, and 17.2.4 When environmental hazard is performed for other than smallest complete shipping unit (see 15.3). 18. Precision and Bias 18.1 The precision and bias of this practice are dependent on those of the various test methods used, and cannot be expressly determined. 19. Keywords 19.1 compression test; distribution cycle; distribution environment; drop test; mechanical handling; package; packaging; random vibration; shipping container; shipping unit; vacuum; vibration

APPENDIXES
(Nonmandatory Information) X1. Appendix-Example Test Plans

X1.1 The following examples will serve to illustrate the use of this practice: X1.2 Example ATest a packaged consumer product. The moderate value and volume of shipment are typical of other products in the shippers line. No damage is acceptable and the package must be in good condition after the test. The berboard packaged product weighs 28 lb (12.7 kg), is 9 in. (0.23 m) high, and palletized 63 in. (1.6 m) high for storage and LTL shipment. The product does not support any of the load. X1.2.1 Step 1, Dene Shipping UnitShipping unit to be tested is a typical pallet load. X1.2.2 Step 2, Establish Assurance LevelAssurance Level II will be used, based on value and volume of shipment. X1.2.3 Step 3, Determine Acceptance Criteria at Assurance Level II: Criterion 1No product damage. Criterion 2All packages in saleable condition. X1.2.4 Step 4, Select Test SchedulesDC6 will be used for this palletized, LTL shipment. X1.2.5 Step 5, Write Test Plan:
Sequence Test Schedule Test Methods D 6055 Method A 1 A Handling Mechanical D 880 Procedure B D 6179 Method C Level Pick up, transport around test course, set down, 5 cycles. Horizontal impact all four sides, 4.0 ft/s (1.22 m/s) Rotational drop, one impact on two opposite base edges from 6 in. (0.152 m). 9Truck9 PSD prole, 0.52 g rms, duration 180 min. Test a column stack of seven individual containersA Pick up, transport around test course, set down, 5 cycles. 4 B Warehouse Stacking

D 880 Procedure B D 6179 Method C

D 642

Horizontal impact all four sides, 4.0 ft/s (1.22 m/s) Rotational drop, one impact on two opposite base edges from 6 in. (0.152 m). Compression to 756 lb (3360 N) (individual containerB H=63 in., F=4.5).

_______________
A Alternative vibration test congurations, 1: test full pallet load, 2: test a single individual container with 168 lb dead weight load to simulate the pallet load. B Alternative full pallet load compression test, 529 lb (2350 N) per bottom tier container.

X1.2.6 Step 6, Select Samples for TestSelect representative samples. X1.2.7 Step 7, Condition SamplesCondition to 23 6 1C, 50 6 2 % relative humidity, in accordance with Practice D 4332. X1.2.8 Step 8, Perform TestsPerform tests in accordance with the test plan in Step 5, as directed in the referenced ASTM standards and in the special instructions for each test schedule. X1.2.9 Step 9, Evaluate ResultsExamine products and packages to determine if the acceptance criteria have been met. X1.2.10 Step 10, Document Test ResultsWrite a report to cover all steps in detail, in accordance with Section 17. X1.3 Example BProduct to be tested is identical to the product from Example A, except that it will be shipped individually through the small parcelsurface distribution system. Additional information is that the container is 18 in. (0.46 m) long and 18 in. (0.46 m) wide. Height is 9 in. (0.23 m) and weight is 28 lb (12.7 kg). X1.3.1 Step 1, Dene Shipping UnitShipping unit to be tested is a single package.
10

D Stacked Vibration

D 4728, Method A or B

A Handling Mechanical

D 6055 Method A

D 4169 05
X1.3.2 Step 2, Establish Assurance LevelAssurance Level II will be used, based on value and volume of shipment. X1.3.3 Step 3, Determine Acceptance Criteria at Assurance Level II: Criterion 1No product damage. Criterion 2All packages in saleable condition. X1.3.4 Step 4, Select Test SchedulesDC-3 will be used for this single package shipment of less than 100 lb (45.4 kg). X1.3.5 Step 5, Write Test Plan:
Sequence Test Schedule Test Method 1 A Handling D 5276 Manual Level One drop on top, two drops on adjacent bottom edges, two drops on diagonally opposite bottom corners, one drop on bottom, drop height 13 in. (330 mm). Compression to 591 lb (2627 N) (Mf=10.0 lb/ft3, H=54 in., F=7.0). 20 min on bottom, 10 min on each of two adjacent sides. 9Truck9 PSD prole, 0.52 g ms, duration 60 min on each of three adjacent sides. 5 A Handling Manual D 5276 One drop on vertical edge, two drops on adjacent side faces, one drop on top corner, one drop on adjacent top edge, drop height 13 in. (330 mm). One drop on bottom, drop height 26 in. (660 mm).

C Vehicle Stacking F Loose Load Vibration E Vehicle Vibration

D 642

3 4

D 999, Method A1 or A2 D 4728, Method A or B

X1.3.6 Step 6, Select Samples for TestSelect representative samples. X1.3.7 Step 7, Condition SamplesCondition to 23 6 1C, 50 6 2 % relative humidity, in accordance with Practice D 4332. X1.3.8 Step 8, Perform TestsPerform tests in accordance with the test plan in Step 5, as directed in the referenced ASTM standards and in the special instructions for each test schedule. X1.3.9 Step 9, Evaluate ResultsExamine products and packages to determine if the acceptance criteria have been met. X1.3.10 Step 10, Document Test ResultsWrite a report to cover all steps in detail, in accordance with Section 17.

X2. Using the DC-2 Distribution Cycle

X2.1 The DC-2 distribution cycle is used when an anticipated distribution is well understood and other cycles, DC-3 through DC-18, are not sufficiently descriptive. The understanding of distribution may be developed in several ways, including: measurement of the environment with appropriate instrumentation; careful observation of the various hazard elements in distribution; reference to published authoritative information; product damage reports; or a combination thereof. X2.2 The user of DC-2 is allowed complete exibility in developing a test plan that accurately reects the anticipated distribution. This includes the ability to vary Assurance Levels between test schedules for each hazard element, as presently stated in 8.2 for application to any Distribution Cycle. The ability to modify test levels or other details within a test schedule is also permitted in DC-2 when experience has shown it more accurately correlates with actual experience. X2.2.1 The following hypothetical examples illustrate instances where such exibility is useful. X2.2.1.1 Example 1For truckload shipments of palletized loads stacked two-high on trailers from a manufacturer to a customer, a thorough study of handling at both ends of the shipping cycle (manufacturer and customer) has shown the following: no signicant impacts against the sides of the loads, only against the ends; seldom any more than one rotational drop of the load on a base edge; small amount of lift truck handling by the manufacturer but a moderate amount by the customer; and no warehousing/stacking of loads in storage by either manufacturer or customer. (1) The user of DC-2 develops a test plan that includes a modied Schedule A Mechanical Handling at the beginning and at the end of the distribution cycle but does not include a compression test, as follows:
11

Sequence 1

Schedule

Test Method

Details of Test and Levels Pick up, transport around test course, set down 3 times

modied A-handling by the manufacturer

D 6055Method A

D 880 Procedure B

D 6179 Method C

Incline impact on each end of the palletized load at 4 ft/s Rotational drop, imipact one end base edge from 6 in. Truck PSD prole, 0.52 g rms, duration 3 h, two loads high Pick up, transport around test course, set down 5 times Incline impact on each end of the palletized load at 4 ft/s Rotational drop, impact on other end base edge from 6 in.

D-transport stacked vibration

D 4728 Method A

modied A-handling by customer

D 6055Method A

D 880 Procedure B

D 6179 Method C

(2) Comparing this test plan to X1.2 Example A where DC-6 was used, the number of tests and intensities are somewhat less. X2.2.1.2 Example 2Following reports of an unacceptable amount of corner damage in shipments of a consumer product direct from the manufacturer to the consumer via small parcel carriers, a thorough study of handling and transport has been

D 4169 05
made. Subsequent corner drop tests revealed that a drop of 42 in. high is needed to produce the type of damage reported and instrumented shipments have veried some drops at that height. The packaged product weighs 43 lb, and outside dimensions of the container are 24 in. length by 10 in. width by 42 in. depth (end-opening 32 ECT grade box). The container and interior corrugated packaging pieces provide all of the support in compression, and the container is marked with This Way Up arrows in normal depth direction. There is no reported damage to the corrugated containers due to excessive compressive loads, and instrumented shipments verify that the container is almost always in a normal depth orientation (42 in. dimension upright) during transportation. The user of DC-2 develops a test plan that simulates the anticipated distribution, as follows:
Sequence 1 Schedule Test Method D 5276 Details of Test and Levels Drop test from 21 in. high in six orientations as described in table of 10.2.3 First Sequence of Distribution Cycles Compression test to 642 lb (M=10.0 lb/ft3, H=108 in., F=7.0 3 F-loose load vibration E-truck vibration modied A-handling by carrier and receiver D 999 A2 40 min on bottom

D 4728

180 min on bottom, 0.52 g rms Drop test from 21 in high in ve orientations as described in table of 10.2.3 Second Sequence of Distribution Cycles. Drop once from 42 in. high on the most damage-prone corner.

D 5276

modied A-handling by shipper and carrier

(1) Comparing to X1.3 Example B where DC-3 was used, this test plans Assurance Levels vary between test schedules in the sequence, drop test heights are higher than any listed in the table of 10.2.3 for the shipping weight involved, compression strength is checked for full trailer height of 108 in. (rather than 54 in. height), and vibration tests are conducted in only one orientation rather than three.

C-stacking in truck

D 642

REFERENCES
(1) Ostrem, F. E., and Libovicz, B. A., A Survey of Environmental Conditions Incident to the Transportation of Materials, General American Research Division, October 1971, PB 204 442. (2) Henzi, A. N., A Survey of Test Methods Currently Used for Simulating the Transportation Environment, General American Research Division, April 1971. PB 202 728, Prepared for Department of Transportation, Office of Hazardous Materials. (3) Ostrem, F. E., and Rumerman, M. L., Shock and Vibration Transportation Design Criteria Manual, General American Research Division, September 1965. N 66 34681. Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (4) International Safe Transit Association. Preshipment Test Procedures, Procedure 1 and 1A, April 1996. (5) EIA Standard RS414A, Simulated Shipping Tests for Consumer Electronic Products and Electronic Components. Electronic Industries Assoc., February 1975. (6) Preshipment Test Standard for Packaged Major Appliances, ANSI/ AHAM MA1PS1980. (7) Federal Test Method Standard No. 101C. Preservation, Packaging, and Packaging Materials: Test Procedures, March 1980. (8) The Railroad Environment, A Guide for Shipper and Railroad Personnel, New York Central Railroad Co., 1966. (9) Packaging for Parcel Post, U.S. Postal Service, November 1974. (10) Ostrem, F. E., and Godshall, W. D., An Assessment of the Common Carrier Shipping Environment. General Technical Report FPL 22, U.S. Forest Product Laboratory, 1979. (11) Transportability Criteria, Shock and Vibration, Department of Army Technical Bulletin TB 55100 Hq., Department of Army, April 1964. (12) Environmental Test Methods, Military Standard 810C, Department of Defense, March 1975. (13) National Motor Freight Classication Item 180, Performance Testing of Shipping Containers, American Trucking Association, Inc., 1995.

ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility. This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every ve years and if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below. This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or [email protected] (e-mail); or through the ASTM website (www.astm.org).

12