Lecture 2 Electrostatics and Radiation
Lecture 2 Electrostatics and Radiation
in case that we know the charge distribution in the whole 3-D space. Unfortunately, in most electrostatic problems, we only know in a finite region and some boundary conditions of . For general shapes of boundary, solution can be extremely hard. Analytically solvable cases are mostly 3 types: box, sphere, and cylinder. 1.1 Box 1. (Problem 4 in Sec 2, 2011) Consider a box with side lengths a, b, and c along the x, y, and z axes. Suppose there is no electric charge in the box and that on the surface of the box except at z = 0 where everywhere in the box. , and at z = c where . Find
Since theres no charge inside the box, the inhomogeneous Poisson equation becomes the homogeneous Laplace equation
The boundary conditions on the - and - faces are homogeneous why on the -face they are inhomogeneous. We may use the separation of variables
Then, from the Laplace equation and the boundary conditions we have
and
is
Using
we get
and
by using the orthogonality of different eigenfunctions and are all zero. We may now find the coefficients specific solution:
2. (Problem 5 in Sec 2, 2012) Consider an infinite pipe with a square cross section as drawn, with three sides grounded and one side at potential . Calculate the potential everywhere inside
the pipe.
In this problem, is independent of essentially two-dimensional. Using the separation of variables general solution
To satisfy
, we require
for all
. This leads to
, we write
, we get
so that
Since
At , the two functions cancel and you recognize the familiar trigonometric expansion of a square wave, so you know everything works. Later in the question, you are asked to find when the boundary value is also nonzero. This seems to have complicated the problem a lot, since we no longer have a pair of homogeneous boundary conditions on either - or -direction. But we can actually solve each nonzero edge separately and add the two solutions at the end using the linearity of the system.
1.2 Sphere 1. (Problem 2 in Sec 2, 2012) A dielectric sphere of radius R is hollowed-out in the region and a thin, grounded, conducting shell inserted at r = s. The sphere is placed in a uniform, external Efield along the z-axis. The dielectric constant is . Calculate the potential in the region .
has cylindrical symmetry. Inside the grounded conducting shell, we . Outside the conducting shell, we have the Laplace equation
for both
and
. But at
at
is still continuous at
implies that the continuity of the tangential component of the electric field is satisfied. Now we have to solve the Laplace equation using the separation of variables in spherical coordinates. We have
are the
This is an Euler differential equation. By doing a change of variable coefficients become constant.
, the varying
is therefore
At
, we require that
. Therefore
At
, we require that
is continuous
and
we have
The
2. (Problem 2 in Sec 2, 2013) A linear uniform charge distribution of extends along the -axis from to . Find a series expansion for of Legendre polynomials valid to all orders, and for .
coulomb/meter in terms
Now we want to do an expansion of in the region of do this, we need the generating function of the Legendre polynomials:
to all orders of
. To
In fact, other than the first few orders of Legendre polynomials, and how they appear in our Poisson equation, theres a lot more you need to review to prepare for the quals the recursive relations, the series expansions, Rodriguez formula, orthogonality relations, etc. Fortunately, you can take a cheat sheet that has everything on it. Once you remember the generating function, you get the multi-pole expansion formula below.
1. (Problem 3 in Sec 2, 2010) Consider an infinitely long, grounded conducting cylinder, of radius a, which is introduced into a uniform electric field . The axis of the cylinder is perpendicular to . (a) Find an expression for the external potential after insertion of the cylinder; (b) Find an expression for the surface charge induced on the cylinder.
in the region or
, we get
In case that
, we have
Defining
as the direction of
Therefore , we have
and
. And at
Positive charge gets propelled to the side while negative charge gets pulled to the side. This makes sense. Not every cylinder involves Bessel functions. Dont get scared. This problem is special because has no -dependence. Bessel functions will typically not appear on quals.
and
the potentials
and
In case that
and
where and is a unit vector along the direction of . Under these two approximations, the vector potential in the radiation zone is given by
We can then calculate the fields and the power distribution from these.
2.2 Electric dipole radiation If the typical length-scale of the source is much smaller than the wave length of the radiation, we can do a Taylor series expansion on and have
look at the leading order term in the above expansion, which is the
and that the total divergence term integrated over all space is zero because we have
following from our locality assumption of the source. Define the electric dipole moment of the source as
Since only differs from by a constant, we have potential under the electric dipole approximation is finally given by
and
Next order of expansion gives us the magnetic dipole and electric quadruple terms, and when it comes to the power radiated, there can be cross terms between them as well. These, however, will be covered in Prof Blaer s E&M class, but will not appear in the quals. 2.3 Sample problems 1. (Problem 1 in Sec 2, 2012) Two point particles (each having the same electric charge +e) travel in the x-y plane around the circumference of a circle (having radius R). Both charges travel at the same angular velocity but maintain a fixed angular separation throughout the motion. Assume that the motion of the particles is non-relativistic ( ).
The particles radiate energy at distance r far from the circular orbit. Find the time-averaged power radiated per solid angle in the direction in the radiation zone (r>>R). The condition enables us to do a multi-pole expansion in the radiation zone . So long as the angular separation of the two particles isnt 180 degrees, theres going to be change in the electric dipole moment of the system as the particles move. Therefore, an electric dipole approximation will be enough to solve the problem. We have
. Therefore,
and
also rotates about the origin at angular frequency . The component of that is parallel to can be found to be
where is the angle between and the projection of generates no radiation power in the direction. Therefore
2. (Problem 1 in Sec 2, 2013) Consider two very tiny oscillating electric dipoles which are located on the z-axis as shown in the diagram.
The two dipoles therefore oscillate in the same -direction with the same amplitude and the same angular frequency but are out of phase by phase angle . Consider a field at point in the radiation zone ( ) and keep only the leading terms. (a) Find the electric field at in the radiation zone. (b) Find the time-averaged power detected per unit solid angle ( direction in the radiation zone. (a) The vector potential in the radiation zone is given by ) in the
and and
are the positions of the two dipoles. There are two different because the two dipoles are located at different positions. And we or not. But we do know
and
where