NATIONAL FORUM OF APPLIED EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL

VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, 2008

Aristotle, Philosophy, and the Ways of Knowing

Through the Realms of Meaning: A National Study on
Integrating a Postmodernist Approach to Education
and Student Academic Achievement

Debbie Watkins William Allan Kritsonis, PhD

PhD Student in Educational Leadership Professor and Faculty Mentor
The Whitlowe R. Green College of Education PhD Program in Educational Leadership
Prairie View A&M University The Whitlowe R. Green College of Education
Prairie View, Texas Prairie View A&M University
Prairie View, Texas
Visiting Lecturer (2005)
Oxford Round Table
University of Oxford, Oxford, England
Distinguished Alumnus (2004)
Central Washington University
College of Education and Professional Studies

________________________________________________________________________

ABSTRACT

“The fundamental task of any educational institution is to determine the manner of

defining and organizing its curriculum. At the outset the obvious fact that there is
more to learn, more to teach, and more to put in the curriculum than time available
presents the educators with hard choices” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. v.) Therefore it is
imperative that new paradigms for educational curriculum designs, teaching
models, and educational delivery systems be investigated to ensure that the most
appropriate levels of meaning and understanding are delivered to the students in
our classrooms. Utilizing a post-modernistic approach to education, this article lays
a beginning foundation and treatise on how to successfully integrate a curriculum
based on philosophy, postmodernism, and the Ways of Knowing Through the Realms
of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007) curriculum selection guide.
________________________________________________________________________

1
NATIONAL FORUM OF APPLIED EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL
2_____________________________________________________________________________________

Introduction

Integrating a philosophical basis for learning can enhance a student’s ability to

understand and effectively utilize the prescribed school curriculum. It is imperative that
educational administrators who lead and contribute to the efficacy of the next
generation’s education be skillfully taught to apply knowledge and understanding to a
holistic framework which focuses on the axiology of a district and the epistemological
and strategic learning pedagogies prescribed by a district. Using a post modernistic
approach to education with a philosophical approach to education allows students the
opportunity to reach higher cognitive levels of academic achievement and success.
Using an integrated approach to education through philosophy, postmodernism, and the
Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007) can effectively
provide a dynamic curriculum structure that can dramatically and positively affect the
school’s curriculum and learning community.

Purpose of the Article

The purpose of this article is to examine the heuristics of the realms of meaning
curriculum philosophy integrating this knowledge with postmodernism ideologies in
order to see how ancient learning can be tied into today’s curriculum and postulate a
modern day formula for student success and achievement in a range of academic
achievement which supersedes basic knowledge and transcends to the level of higher
knowledge and cognitive thinking skills.

The Challenges of a Fragmented Curriculum

In today’s educational society, learning is fragmented into segmented constraints

of subject matter with little or no connection to the real world. In most curriculums,
subject mastery simply consists of being able to repeat stated facts recorded in a text
book. This type of instruction will only produce learners who think at the basest levels of
the educational learning pyramid. Without the ability to apply the knowledge learned in
the classroom to larger areas of problem solving and academic achievement, the next
generation of students will not have the proper skills and education to be informed
citizens, competent workers, and moral and ethical individuals.
Today’s educators are fully aware of the challenges that face them each and
everyday. However, a synoptic framework of educational delivery is needed that will
focus on student needs and will provide an axiological perspective on how to make
 DEBBIE WATKINS AND WILLIAM ALLAN KRITSONIS
_______________________________________________________________________3

changes that will improve, direct, and inspire new generations of teachers and students to
think creatively, critically, and responsibly.

Philosophy and Education

Since the inception of time, man has searched for meaning and structure not only
personally, but generically and for society as a whole. This search for meaning has
known no time frame for conception and continues to this day to be the driving force for
the accumulation of knowledge, wisdom, and purposeful life activities. “Today the focus
on education at all levels and for students of all abilities is increasingly upon excellence
and adequacy of knowledge” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. vii). Integrating philosophy and the
axiological perspectives of reflective scholars into the curriculum provides a process of
disciplined inquiry that can philosophically and empirically change the dynamics of
education from a delivery system that is linear, unproductive and filled with base level
learning opportunities into a curriculum and teaching delivery system that is dynamic,
purposeful, and that meets the needs of both current and future academic philosophers,
teachers, students, and administrators.

Integrating the Ways of Knowing and the Realms of Meanings with an

Educational Curriculum Philosophy and Delivery System

“Studying educational philosophy can help teachers and other educators focus on
questions that are speculative, prescriptive, and analytical; it can help enlarge thoughts so
better personal choices can be made; it helps in self-evaluation of beliefs and self-
knowledge” (Kritsonis, 2002, p. 91). By evaluating the philosophies and philosophers of
both past and present generations, today’s educator can develop a framework for
effective academic leadership with the end result of affecting positive and productive
academic change in today’s diverse and highly challenging academic centers for student
learning and achievement.
The challenge for implementing a successful philosophy and educational theory
for learning is that there are many ideas, mantras, and mandates for learning that have
been passed down from one generation to another. Postmodernism ideas and venues
challenge the educator to think outside of the box and seek new ways of viewing old
problems. “To this end, postmodernism is a kind of open-bordered approach to inquiry”
(English, 2003, p. 4).
NATIONAL FORUM OF APPLIED EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL
4_____________________________________________________________________________________

A Post-Modernist Approach to Educational Theory and Education

“The postmodernist approaches theory with the idea that metanarratives (theories)
are essential for the establishment of professional practice, and that many theories can
contain practices which will prove beneficial to educating children in a variety of
settings” (English, 2003, p.4). From a theoretical perspective, the Ways of Knowing
Through the Realms of Meaning(Kritsonis, 2007) offers six realms of learning and
inquiry that can form the basis of a critical learning and highly effective curriculum
model.
“The six realms cover the range of possible meanings. They may be regarded as
comprising the basic competencies that general education should develop in every
person” (Kritsonis, 2002, p. 15). It is interesting to note that while the Ways of Knowing
Through the Realms of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007) is a current work of epistemological
scholarship, the basis for the concepts employed in this educational framework can be
seen to allay with great works of literature and educational philosophies of the past.
When students, teachers, and administrators learn to take a constructivist approach to
education and merge the knowledge and philosophies of the past with the current
metaphysical world of educational study and ontology, educational leaders and student
participants will find new meaning, challenge, and hope in the educational progress and
current intellectual designs for academic achievement and success. Thinking outside of
the box and through the telescopic lens of postmodernism, educational leaders can design
a curriculum that offers depth, meaning, and purposeful understanding of life both in the
spiritual, physical, and mental aspects of the educational process.

Metaphysics

Before Christ, men and women of understanding sought to know and understand
the basis for life and meaning in the form of knowing truth and its application to life,
meaning, and understanding. Aristotle has been quoted as saying, “The study of truth
requires a study of causes” (Loomis, 1971, p. 11). Educational inquiry should be focused
on more than current issues and trends. When students are challenged to look at the
causes of a transaction, why the action has occurred, the consequences of the occurrence,
and how the new knowledge can be applied to new situations, then it can be rightly stated
that the student has mastered the constructive concepts of learning and academic
proliferation and intellectual success.
 DEBBIE WATKINS AND WILLIAM ALLAN KRITSONIS
_______________________________________________________________________5

A Postmodernist Perspective of Aristotle, the Ways of Knowing

Through the Realms of Meaning and Curriculum Selection

There are many philosophical perspectives in regards to learning, meaning, and

ultimate happiness and joy. Postmodernism suggests that “there is no single quality that
may be designated as the one essence of meaning” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 10). There are
however patterns of meaning. These patterns “emerge from the analysis of the possible
distinctive modes of human understanding. These six patterns may be designated
respectively as symbolics, empirics, esthetics, synnoetics, ethics, and synoptics”
(Kritsonis, 2007, p. 11).

Aristotle and the Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning

One of the greatest proponents of an epistemological and axiological framework

for student learning and academic achievement was the Greek philosopher Aristotle.
“Aristotle believed in a spiritual explanation of the universe, but one obtained by careful
investigation and analysis of observed phenomena” (Loomis, 1971, p. i). In agreement
with Aristotle’s primary focus of meaning and purpose in education, Dr. Kritsonis states
that “human beings are essentially creatures who have the power to experience meanings.
Distinctively human experience consists in a pattern of meanings. Furthermore, general
education is the process of engendering essential meanings” (Kritsonis, 2002, p. 7).

Aristotle, Symbolics and Classical Greek Instruction

Understanding the philosophical basis for an educational system can help to

improve the academic success of students on a wide spectrum of learning abilities and
styles. Combining philosophy with other modes of instruction can also provide a new
and intriguing way to present educational concepts. The Ways of Knowing Through the
Realms of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007) is a curriculum model that can easily be studied in
tandem with philosophy. To understand this new construct, the realms must be examined
and related to philosophical frameworks and constraints.
The first realm of meaning is symbolics. “Symbolics comprises ordinary
language, mathematics, and various types of nondiscursive symbolic forms, such as
gestures, rituals, rhythmic patterns, and the like” (Kritsonis, 2002, p. 11). Aristotle
believed in discourse. Throughout his lifetime, “rhetoric continued to interest Aristotle”
(Masters, 1982, p. 20). He wrote a treatise on Rhetoric that is reflective of his view on
communication, literature, speech, and communication. Just as the realms model of
learning supports an integrated curriculum, Aristotle believed that “rhetoric and literature
NATIONAL FORUM OF APPLIED EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL
6_____________________________________________________________________________________

are closely connected: Aristotle wrote a historico-critical book On the Poets and a
collection of Homeric Problems” (Barnes, 1982, p. 20).
Speech and rhetoric were important tools of learning for Aristotle. He believed
that communication and language were two components essential to fundamental
meaning and appropriate and meaningful intellectual discourse. “One of Aristotle’s main
claims in the Gyrllus was that rhetoric should not excite the passions by fine language but
should rather persuade the reason by fine argument” (Barnes, 1982, p. 20).

Aristotle and Empirics

The second realm of meaning is empirics.

Empirics includes the sciences of the physical world, of living things, and
of man. These sciences provide factual descriptions, generalizations, and
theoretical formulations and explations that are based upon observation
and experimentation in the world of matter, life, mind, and society.
(Kritsonis, 2007, p. 12)

Aristotle himself was an avid proponent for scientific discovery and discourse. Aristotle
“made and collected observations in astronomy, meteorology, chemistry, physics (and)
psychology” (Barnes, 1982, p. 3). His most famous works however were in the areas of
biology and zoology. “His studies on animals laid the foundations of the biological
sciences; and they were not superseded until more than two thousand years after his
death” (Barnes, 1982, p. 9).

Aristotle and Esthetics

The third realm of meaning is esthetics. Esthetics contain “the various arts, such
as music, the visual arts, the arts of movement, and literature. Meanings in this realm are
concerned with the contemplative perception of particular significant things as unique
objectifications of ideated subjectivities” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 12). According to Aristotle,
“Art imitates or represents human life, and in particular human actions” (Masters, 1982,
p. 83).
“Aristotle is often accused of providing a narrowly intellectual view of the good
life: Home and Phidias – or Rembrandt and Bach-will not, in his opinion, served as
examples of success or as illustrations of eudemonia” (Barnes, 1982, p. 83). The
accusation that he had no artistic or esthetic bent toward learning “may well be unjust, for
 DEBBIE WATKINS AND WILLIAM ALLAN KRITSONIS
_______________________________________________________________________7

the ideal of contemplation advanced n the Ethics is perhaps large enough to encompass a
life of artistic or literary genius” (Barnes, 1982, p. 83).

Aristotle and Synnoetics

The fourth realm of meaning is synnoetics. Synnoetics embraces the conceptual

ideal of personal knowledge espoused by Michael Polanyi and the “I-Thou” relationship
attributed to Martin Buber. Aristotle responded to the world around him with intellectual
curiosity and resolve. Aristotle believed that “a man’s noblest aim is to immortalize
himself or imitate the gods, for in doing so he becomes most fully a man and most fully
himself” (Barnes, 1982, p. 2). The synnoetic, philosophical structure of Aristotle’s life,
philosophy, and happiness also states that “we must not listen to those who urge us to
think human thoughts since we are human, and mortal thoughts since we are mortal;
rather, we should as far as possible immortalize ourselves and do all we can to live by the
finest element in us – for if it is small in bulk, it is far greater than anything else in power
and worth” (Barnes, 1982, p.2).

Aristotle and Ethics

The fifth realm of meaning is ethics. “Ethics includes moral meanings that
express obligation rather than fact, perceptual form, or awareness of relation. In contrast
to the sciences, which are concerned with abstract, cognitive understanding, to the arts,
which express idealized esthetic perceptions, and to personal knowledge, which reflects
intersubjective understanding, morality has to do with personal conduct that is based on
free, responsible, deliberate decision” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 13).
Aristotle’s views on ethics are chronicled in the book known as the Nicomachean
Ethics. It is one of Aristotle’s most famous works. “The purpose of all ethics, we are
told at the outset, is the search for that good that everyone aims to get out of living”
(Loomis, 1971, p. 85). Knowing right and wrong is important for all generations.
Teaching students the ethical dimensions of life can add meaning and knowledge to the
other areas of the curriculum and surmount a basis for ethical discourse and discussion
throughout the curriculum.
NATIONAL FORUM OF APPLIED EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL
8_____________________________________________________________________________________

Aristotle and Synoptics

The sixth realm of meaning is synoptics. Synoptics is an integrative curriculum

and includes the areas of philosophy, religion, and history. History allows the reader to
interpret the meaning of past events with current discourse and make judgments on the
relevancy of current events and their meaning to one’s own present day life and activities.
“Religion is concerned with ultimate meanings, that is, with meanings from any realm
whatsoever, considered from the standpoint of such boundary concepts as the Whole, the
Comprehensive, and the Transcendent” (Kritsonis, 2007, p. 13).
Aristotle, the great philosopher, encompassed all of the attributes of a great
synoptic thinker. Aristotle expressed his belief in God and his divine order for creation
and life. He concluded that all must believe in God. Aristotle believed in theoretical
truth and knowledge. According to Aristotle, “everyone believes that God is one of the
causes and a first principle of things, and either God alone or above all others possesses
this science” (Loomis, p. 10). Evaluating life on a synoptic realm gives evidence that his
thinking in today’s society would be considered creative, intellectual, and post
modernistic.

Concluding Remarks

In conclusion, there are many challenges that face our educational system.
Meeting these challenges will demand a new approach to educational leadership and
administrative curriculum development. By thinking outside of the box and applying
new strategies to old problems, educators can be successful in integrating the curriculum,
knowledge and educational strategies needed to meet this new and demanding age of
educational accountability.
Through a post-modernistic view of education, the philosophical framework of
the Ways of Knowing Through the Realms of Meaning (Kritsonis, 2007) curriculum
philosophy, educators can seek to creatively and succinctly tie axiological views of
curriculum structure into the learning process that will add value, meaning, and
accomplishment to the educational communities and student learners we have been given
the opportunity and responsibility to teach.
This philosophical model for learning can be translated into student academic
achievement when educators take courage, step “out of the box” of their tried and true
methods of educational leadership, and resolve to make new changes for a new age of
integrated learning, success, and meaningful learning in the academic and educational
setting and community.
 DEBBIE WATKINS AND WILLIAM ALLAN KRITSONIS
_______________________________________________________________________9

References

Barnes, J. (1982). Aristotle. New York : Oxford University Press.

English, F. (2003). The postmodern challenge to the theory and practice of educational
administration. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas - Publisher, LTD.
Kritsonis, W. (2007). Ways of knowing through the realms of meaning. Houston, TX:
National FORUM Press.
Loomis, L. (1971). Aristotle on man in the universe. Avenel, NJ: Gramercy Books.