Eur J Esthet Dent 2008 VailatiF-1

Francesca Vailati, MD, DMD, MSc
Senior Lecturer, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion

School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva
Switzerland
Urs Christoph Belser, DMD, Prof Dr med dent
Chairman, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion
School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva
Switzerland
CLINICAL APPLICATION
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1 SPRING 2008
30
Full-Mouth Adhesive Rehabilitation
of a Severely Eroded Dentition:
The Three-Step Technique. Part 1.
Correspondence to: Dr Francesca Vailati
University of Geneva, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, Rue Barthelemy-Menn 19, 1203 Geneva, Switzerland;
e-mail: [email protected].
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
VAILATI/BELSER
31
clinical steps, allowing the clinician and the
laboratory technician to constantly interact
to achieve the most predictable esthetic
and functional outcome. During the first
step, an esthetic evaluation is performed to
establish the position of the plane of occlu-
sion. In the second step, the patients pos-
terior quadrants are restored at an in-
creased vertical dimension. Finally, the
third step reestablishes the anterior guid-
ance. Using the three-step technique, the
clinician can transform a full-mouth reha-
bilitation into a rehabilitation for individual
quadrants. This article illustrates only the
first step in detail, explaining all the clinical
parameters that should be analyzed before
initiating treatment.
(Eur J Esthet Dent 2008;3:3044.)
Abstract
Traditionally, a full-mouth rehabilitation
based on full-crown coverage has been
the recommended treatment for patients
affected by severe dental erosion. Nowa-
days, thanks to improved adhesive tech-
niques, the indications for crowns have
decreased and a more conservative
approach may be proposed.
Even though adhesive treatments sim-
plify both the clinical and laboratory pro-
cedures, restoring such patients still re-
mains a challenge due to the great
amount of tooth destruction. To facilitate
the clinicians task during the planning and
execution of a full-mouth adhesive rehabil-
itation, an innovative concept has been de-
veloped: the three-step technique. Three
laboratory steps are alternated with three
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
32
may be too aggressive considering that
the population affected by erosion is gen-
erally very young (Fig 1).
When a 14-year-old patient receives a
full-mouth conventional rehabilitation, such
as in a recently published report,
2
the fol-
lowing questions should be considered:
How many times will these crowns have to
be replaced in the future, and what will be
the prognosis of such teeth? How many of
the teeth will remain vital? How many will
become nonrestorable (Fig 2)?
Patients affected by severe dental erosion
often present with an extremely damaged
dentition, especially in the anterior maxil-
lary quadrant. The vertical dimension of oc-
clusion (VDO) may have decreased, and
supraeruption may have occurred. If ero-
sion is not intercepted at an early stage, full-
mouth rehabilitation may be required. Ac-
cording to the available literature (case
reports only), the recommended therapy
comprises both extensive elective root
canal treatment and full-crown coverage of
almost all teeth.
13
However, this approach
Fig 1 (a and b) Severely eroded dentition in a 27-year-old patient.
Fig 2 Panoramic radio-
graph of a 70-year-old patient
with a heavily restored denti-
tion. The patient received his
first full-mouth rehabilitation
at the age of 50.
a b
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
VAILATI/BELSER
33
mouth adhesive restorations. Consequent-
ly, the debate is still open on whether a pos-
sibly less durable adhesive rehabilitation is
preferable to longer-lasting but more ag-
gressive conventional treatment.
For this reason, a clinical trial is under-
way at the University of Geneva. All patients
affected by generalized erosion are sys-
tematically and exclusively treated with ad-
hesive techniques, using onlays for the
posterior region and bonded laminate ve-
neers for the anterior region. The goal is to
evaluate the longevity of adhesive rehabil-
itations before proposing this treatment as
the new standard of care.
The three-step technique
To achieve maximum preservation of tooth
structure and the most predictable esthet-
ic and functional outcomes, an innovative
concept has been developed: the three-
step technique (Table 1). Three laboratory
steps are alternated with three clinical
steps, allowing the clinician and dental
The current literature does not answer
these questions. No long-term follow-up
studies of similar cases are available. Con-
sequently, before proposing conventional
full-mouth rehabilitation to young individu-
als affected by erosion, clinicians should
consider more conservative approaches.
In this context, improved adhesive tech-
niques may be a valid alternative, at least
to postpone more invasive treatments un-
til the patient is older.
47
The adhesive approach preserves more
tooth structure and avoids elective en-
dodontic therapy. In addition, in the au-
thors opinion, the esthetic outcome of teeth
restored with bonded porcelain restora-
tions is superior to that achieved with ce-
mented crown restorations. Further, gingi-
va seems to interact better with the margins
of bonded veneers than with the margins
of cemented crowns, resulting in less in-
flammation or dark colorations.
However, while several authors have
documented long-term follow-up for con-
ventional fixed prostheses,
817
there is a lack
of comparable long-term data on full-
Laboratory
Maxillary
vestibular waxup
Posterior
occlusal waxup
Maxillary anterior
palatal onlays
Step 1:
Esthetics
Step 2:
Posterior support
Step 3:
Anterior guidance
Clinical
Assessment
of occlusal plane
Creation of poste-
rior occlusion at
an increased VDO
Reestablishment
of final anterior
guidance
Table 1 The three-step technique
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
34
The importance of a predictable result
that satisfies both the patient and clinician
cannot be stressed enough in todays
world of esthetically demanding patients.
Surprisingly, many clinicians still decide on
the esthetic outcome for their patients, and
thus the result seldom meets the patients
expectations. A structured strategy to min-
imize such an esthetic defeat is to devote
sufficient time to educate patients about
the treatment options and expected results.
The first step of this three-step technique is
conceived to guarantee that the clinician
and technicians vision for the planned
restoration is a reflection of the patients
true desires.
Step 1:
Maxillary vestibular waxup and
assessment of the occlusal plane
Generally, at the beginning of a full-mouth
rehabilitation, the clinician will provide the
laboratory technician with the diagnostic
casts and request a full-mouth waxup.
Since each parameter, such as incisal
edges, teeth axes, teeth shapes and sizes,
occlusal plane, etc, is easily controlled,
waxing both the maxillary and mandibular
arches is not a difficult task.
Clinicians should realize, however, that
laboratory technicians will often arbitrarily
decide on these parameters without seeing
the patients and with a misleading lack of
reference points (eg, adjacent intact teeth).
Unfortunately, a decision based only on di-
agnostic casts is extremely risky, since a
dental restoration that appears perfect on
the cast may be clinically inadequate.
One method to ensure that everyone is
on the same page is the use of a mock-
up, a technique that makes it possible to
anticipate the final shape of the teeth in
the mouth. Several authors have already
technician to constantly interact during the
planning and execution of a full-mouth ad-
hesive rehabilitation.
In the first laboratory step, instead of a
full-mouth waxup, the technician is instruct-
ed to wax up only the vestibular aspect of
the maxillary teeth (esthetically driven wax-
up). Afterwards, the clinician will check if
the waxup is clinically correct using a max-
illary vestibular mockup (first clinical step).
During the second laboratory step, the
technician focuses on the posterior quad-
rants, creating a posterior occlusal waxup
to determine a new VDO. The second clin-
ical step is to give the patient a stable oc-
clusion in the posterior quadrants at an in-
creased VDO, closely reproducing the
occlusal scheme of the waxup. With the
use of silicon keys duplicating the waxup,
all four posterior quadrants will be restored
with provisional posterior composites.
Finally, the third step deals with the re-
construction of the palatal aspect of the
maxillary anterior teeth (restoration of the
anterior guidance) before restoring the
vestibular aspect with bonded porcelain
restorations.
In this article, only the first step is
discussed.
Treatment planning
Unrealistic patient expectations are often a
contraindication to dental treatment. How-
ever, what seems to be an unrealistic ex-
pectation may in fact be a poorly ex-
pressed expectation or an expectation that
is misunderstood by the clinician. Even
when there is seemingly perfect three-way
communication (patient/clinician/techni-
cian), there is always potential for misun-
derstandings, especially when dealing with
patients who are accustomed to viewing
themselves with small, eroded teeth.
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
VAILATI/BELSER
35
proposed the use of a mockup for veneer
restorations of anterior teeth.
18,19
In cases
of severe generalized destruction of the
dentition, a mockup of only the anterior
teeth could be misleading, since the teeth
will appear inharmonious with the unre-
Fig 3 Frontal (a) and profile (b) views of a 45-year-old patient affected by gastric reflux. Note the severe gen-
eralized tooth destruction as a result of the dental erosion.
stored posterior teeth. Instead, a mockup
that involves all maxillary teeth may be a
more appropriate approach (Figs 3 to 5).
To obtain a mockup of all maxillary teeth
is not necessary at this initial stage to have
a full mouth wax-up. In fact, the three-step
a
a
Fig 4 Both a traditional mockup (covering only the maxillary anterior teeth) (a and b) and a maxillary vestibu-
lar mock-up (from second premolar to second premolar) (c and d) were used to evaluate esthetics. With the
traditional mockup, the anterior teeth appeared too long, and the patient disliked their length and shape. Once
the mockup was extended to the premolars, the patient rated the same anterior teeth as esthetically pleasing.
b
b
c d
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
36
technique proposes that the technician
should wax up only the vestibular surface
of the maxillary teeth. To save time and fa-
cilitate the next clinical step, neither the
cingula of the anterior maxilla nor the
palatal cusps of the maxillary posterior
teeth are included.
In situations where the vestibular aspect
of the first molars was not affected by the
erosion, the technician may stop the wax-
up at the level of the premolars (Fig 6). The
maxillary second molar is never included
in the waxup. At the completion of the max-
illary vestibular waxup, the first clinical step
(maxillary vestibular mockup) is intro-
duced so that the clinician can confirm the
direction taken by the technician. The fac-
tors that should be considered during this
assessment will now be discussed.
Incisal edges
Patients are often shocked by the in-
creased length of the incisors selected by
the clinician and technician. After years of
seeing themselves with a compromised
dentition, many patients cannot immedi-
Fig 5 Facial views before (a) and after (b and c) the maxillary vestibular mockup.
Fig 6 (a and b) Maxillary vestibular wax-up. Note that the cingula and the palatal cusps are not included.
In this patient, the vestibular aspects of both the first maxillary molars were intact and thus not included in the
waxup.
b a c
a b
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
VAILATI/BELSER
37
ately adapt to more voluminous teeth.
Often, patients will eventually agree to such
a change if they are allowed to test the new
teeth; however, some patients will never
accept it. Clinicians cannot impose their
personal opinions onto their patients, but
they can try to guide the patient in making
an informed decision.
The mockup represents an excellent
opportunity for patients and clinicians to
truly understand each others points of
view. The mockup covering the teeth can
be shortened or lengthened (using flow-
able composite), and their shape can be
modified. If major changes are made, an
alginate impression can be taken to guide
the technician.
Occlusal plane
The innovative aspect of the three-step
technique is the extension of the mockup
to the vestibular aspect of the maxillary
posterior teeth. The inclusion of the four
premolars is crucial, not only to visualize
their buccal aspect in comparison with the
anterior teeth (vestibular harmony), but al-
so to relate the plane of occlusion to the in-
cisal edges. Maxillary incisal edges and the
occlusal plane should be in harmony for
an optimal esthetic and functional result.
In a frontal, smiling view, the cusps of the
posterior teeth should follow the lower lip
and be located more cervically than the in-
cisal edges. Otherwise, an unpleasant, re-
verse smile is generated.
When an increase of the VDO is antici-
pated in a full-mouth rehabilitation, the
question of how to divide the extra interoc-
clusal space is generally answered by
sharing the space equally between the
mandibular and maxillary arches. However,
such a decision is completely arbitrary and
may lead to a repositioning of the occlusal
plane at a lower level than the original.
Unfortunately, in cases of erosion, the
loss of tooth structure is often compensat-
ed for by supraeruption, especially in the
maxillary posterior region and mandibu-
lar anterior region. One goal of a full-
mouth rehabilitation should be the cor-
rection of such a situation. The technician
must know to what extent the incisal
edges can be lengthened before decid-
ing on the occlusal planes position and
waxing up the posterior quadrants. A
maxillary vestibular mockup, which visu-
alizes both the incisal edges and the buc-
cal cusps of the posterior teeth, can help
verify the orientation of the future occlusal
plane (Figs 7 and 8).
Fig 7 (a to c) When an increased VDO is planned, the position of the occlusal plane is decided arbitrarily by
the technician. Often, the obtained space is shared equally between the two arches, with a consequent change
of position of the occlusal plane (lower position). This arbitrary decision can compromise the esthetic outcome in
patients with a preexisting reverse smile.
b a c
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
38
Fig 8 (a to f) Before and after views of a 27-year-old patient with a history of gastric acid reflux. The mockup
reestablished the harmony between the occlusal and incisal planes.
a b
c d
e f
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
VAILATI/BELSER
39
Fig 9 (a to c) If crown-lengthening surgery is antic-
ipated, the mockup can help visualize the amount of at-
tachment to be removed.
Harmony with the maxillary molars
If the waxup is stopped at the level of the
maxillary premolars, it will be possible dur-
ing the maxillary vestibular mockup to eval-
uate how the unrestored molars will blend
in with the restoration planned for the pre-
molars. The lip display will also preview the
visibility of the buccal margins of the future
restorations (onlays) for the molars.
Emergence profile and gingival levels
At the time of the waxup, the clinician and
technician can determine whether crown
lengthening is needed (Figs 9 and 10). To
confirm if mucogingival surgery is neces-
sary and to what extent, the technician
should wax the cervical aspect of the future
restorations overlapping the gingiva of the
cast. Consequently, the teeth of the mock-
up will cover the gingiva of the patient. Their
emergence profile will be slightly altered,
but they will still provide a good sense of
the final outcome to both the clinician and
the patient.
c
a b
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
40
Based on the lip display, the teeth to be
involved in the surgery can be selected,
and the patient can make an informed de-
cision whether to accept the surgery. This
presurgical mockup can be a powerful tool
to convince reluctant patients. In these cas-
es, the compromised result could also be
visualized with another mockup, this time
without the gingival overlap.
Number of teeth involved
in the rehabilitation
Sometimes, patients are not fully aware of
the level of destruction of their dentition.
Motivated primarily by esthetics, patients
may believe that a satisfactory result can be
achieved by focusing only on the anterior
teeth, and thus they will not be interested in
a more comprehensive treatment plan. To
avoid investing unnecessary time and
money, a maxillary vestibular mockup
could be used. The mockup covering the
posterior teeth could then be removed,
leaving the patient with the mockup of on-
ly the six anterior teeth. While some of these
patients will still run away as anticipated,
others will be convinced to accept the
more extensive treatment.
Clinical steps for the maxillary
vestibular mockup
The maxillary vestibular mockup is quickly
and easily fabricated in the patients mouth
and offers the possibility to concretely visu-
alize the final outcome. A silicon key should
be made from the maxillary vestibular wax-
up and loaded with a tooth-colored mate-
rial in the patients mouth (Fig 11). After its
removal, all vestibular surfaces of the max-
illary teeth will be covered by a thin layer of
composite, reproducing the shape select-
ed for the future restorations with the wax-
up. In our clinic, the material of choice is
Protemp (3M ESPE), a resin composite that
generates a limited exothermic reaction
and is easy to dispense and less subject to
porosity than polymethyl metacrylate.
Since the cingula of the anterior teeth and
the palatal cusps of the posterior teeth are
not included in the waxup, the silicon key
will be stable in the mouth. It will also be
stabilized on both sides by the unrestored
second molars (distal stops).
Due to the keys close adaptation, ex-
cess material will be minimal and easy to
remove using a scalpel or scaler (Fig 12).
It is not recommended to remove and re-
a b
Fig 10 (a and b) After surgery, the mockup can be used to evaluate the outcome.
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
VAILATI/BELSER
41
the retentive areas (interproximally). The
clinician, however, should pay particular at-
tention to that excess, since it can interfere
cement the mockup, because this may
break it or distort its appearance. The
mockup is stabilized by excess material in
Fig 11 (a and b) A silicone key of the maxillary vestibular waxup is fabricated and loaded with tooth-colored
provisional resin composite.
Fig 12 (a to c) Due to the keys close adaptation,
very little excess will be present after its removal. Note
the shortening of the canines (c) The mockup can be
easily modified in the patients mouth.
a b
a b
C
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
42
Fig 13 (a to f) Before and after views of a 27-year-old female patient. Without the mockup, it was difficult to
evaluate her smile, since she was uncomfortable showing her damaged teeth.
a b
c d
e f
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
VAILATI/BELSER
43
with the patients normal oral hygiene pro-
cedures. The challenge is to open the gin-
gival embrasures just enough to allow den-
tal floss (eg, SuperFloss, Oral B) to pass
through without jeopardizing the strength
of the mockup. It is also recommended to
accurately remove the excesses at the lev-
el of the buccal gingival sulci to better un-
derstand the emergence profile and gingi-
val harmony of the future restoration.
The patient can leave the office wearing
the mockup for a short time to show it to
family members and friends. Due to its
minimal thickness, the mockup will eventu-
ally break off, making it easily removable by
the patient. After evaluating the maxillary
vestibular mockup in the patients mouth
(Fig 13), any changes can be made by the
technician, who will then progress with the
second laboratory step.
Conclusions
Patients affected by severe dental erosion
often present severely damaged dentition.
However, the traditional restorative ap-
proach (full-mouth rehabilitation with
crowns) may be too aggressive for this
generally young patient population. In the
authors opinion, an adhesive approach
should be preferred to preserve tooth
structure and postpone the more invasive
treatments until the patient is older.
Even though adhesive techniques sim-
plify both the clinical and laboratory proce-
dures, restoring such a patient still remains
a challenge due to the amount of tooth de-
struction. To achieve maximum preserva-
tion of the tooth structure and the most pre-
dictable esthetic and functional outcome,
an innovative concept has been devel-
oped: the three-step technique. The three-
step technique is a simplified approach
that emphasizes interdisciplinary collabo-
ration between the clinician and laboratory
technician.
In this article, only the first step of the
technique was described. By using a sim-
ple maxillary vestibular mockup, the labo-
ratory technician can gain precious infor-
mation, and the treatment of a severely
eroded dentition can begin in a less arbi-
trary way. The time-consuming initial diag-
nosis should not discourage the clinician,
since the patients full participation in any
decision-making process is extremely
valuable. Indeed, allowing patients to visu-
alize the final result before treatment begins
both reassures them and helps them ac-
cept more comprehensive treatments.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr Pierre-Jeanne Loup,
School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, for his
expertise in parodontology The authors also thank the
laboratory technicians and ceramists, Sylvan Carciofo
and Dominique Vinci, School of Dental Medecine, Uni-
versity of Geneva, for the excellent laboratory support.
References
1. Kavoura V, Kourtis SG, Zoidis P, Andritsakis DP,
Doukoudakis A. Full-mouth rehabilitation of a
patient with bulimia nervosa. A case report. Quin-
tessence Int 2005;36:501510.
2.Van Roekel NB. Gastroesophageal reflux disease,
tooth erosion, and prosthodontic rehabilitation:
A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2003;12:255259.
3.Bonilla ED, Luna O. Oral rehabilitation of a bulimic
patient: A case report. Quintessence Int 2001;32:
469475.
4.Hayashi M, Shimizu K, Takeshige F, Ebisu S.
Restoration of erosion associated with gastroe-
sophageal reflux caused by anorexia nervosa
using ceramic laminate veneers: A case report.
Oper Dent 2007;32:306310.
5.Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Schaffner M. Prevention and
minimally invasive treatment of erosions. Oral
Health Prev Dent 2004;2 Suppl 1:321325.
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
44
16. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD,
Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unser-
viceable crowns and fixed par-
tial dentures: Life-span and
causes for loss of serviceabili-
ty. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:
13951401.
17. Pjetursson BJ, Bragger U, Lang
NP, Zwahlen M. A systemic
review of the survival and
complication rates of all-
ceramic and metal-ceramic
reconstructions after an obser-
vation period of at least 3
years. Part I: Single crowns.
Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18
Suppl 3:7385.
18. Magne P, Belser UC. Novel
porcelain laminate preparation
approach driven by a diagnos-
tic mock-up. J Esthet Restor
Dent 2004;16:716.
19. Belser UC, Magne P, Magne
M. Ceramic laminate veneers:
Continuous evolution of indi-
cations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:
197207.
11. Valderhaug J, Jokstad A, Amb-
jornsen E, Norheim PW.
Assessment of the periapical
and clinical status of crowned
teeth over 25 years. J Dent
1997;25:97105.
12. Valderhaug J. A 15-year clini-
cal evaluation of fixed prostho-
dontics. Acta Odontol Scand
1991;49:3540.
13. Karlsson S. Failures and length
of service in fixed prosthodon-
tics after long-term function. A
longitudinal clinical study.
Swed Dent J 1989;13:185192.
14. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar
JR. A survey of crown and
fixed partial denture failures:
Length of service and reasons
for replacement. J Prosthet
Dent 1986;56:416421.
15. Coornaert J, Adriaens P, De
Boever J. Long-term clinical
study of porcelain-fused-to-
gold restorations. J Prosthet
Dent 1984;51:338342.
6. Sundaram G, Bartlett D, Wat-
son T. Bonding to and protect-
ing worn palatal surfaces of
teeth with dentine bonding
agents. J Oral Rehabil 2004;
31:505509.
7. Hastings JH. Conservative
restoration of function and aes-
thetics in a bulimic patient: A
case report. Pract Periodontics
Aesthet Dent 1996;8:729736.
8. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP,
Dhoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V.
Long-term evaluation of exten-
sive restorations in permanent
teeth. Dent 2003;31:395405.
9. Walton TR. An up to 15-year
longitudinal study of 515 metal-
ceramic FPDs: Part 1. Out-
come. Int J Prosthodont 2002;
15:439445.
10. Walton TR. A 10-year longitudi-
nal study of fixed prosthodon-
tics: Clinical characteristics and
outcome of single-unit metal-
ceramic crowns. Int J Prostho-
dont 1999;12:519526.
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n
w
w
w
.
a
r
t
o
f
s
a
l
a
.
c
h
C
o
pyrig
h
t
b
y
N
o
t
f o r
Q
u
i
n
t
e
s
senc
e
N
o
t
f
o
r
P
u
b
lic
a
tio
n

Eur J Esthet Dent 2008 VailatiF-1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Eur J Esthet Dent 2008 VailatiF-1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Eur J Esthet Dent 2008 VailatiF-1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Francesca Vailati, MD, DMD, MSc

Senior Lecturer, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion

You might also like