Frank Sewall DANTE AND SWEDENBORG London 1893
Frank Sewall DANTE AND SWEDENBORG London 1893
Frank Sewall DANTE AND SWEDENBORG London 1893
SWEDENBORG
WITH OTHER ESSAYS ON THE
NEW RENAISSANCE
BY
FRANK SEWALL
AUTHOR OF Il THE ETHICS OF SERVICE;" CI THE NEW METAPHYSICS ;
OR, THE LAW OF END, CAUSE AND EFJ'ECT," ETC.
~
JAMES SPEIRS
36 BLOOMSBURY STREET, LONDON
18 93
lInrbnrb <Œoll,g, Librnr~
NEW RENAISSANCE
BY
FRANK SEWALL
AUTHOR OF Il THE ETHICS OF SERVICE;" CI THE NEW METAPHYSICS ;
OR, THE LAW OF END, CAUSE AND EFJ'ECT," ETC.
~
JAMES SPEIRS
36 BLOOMSBURY STREET, LONDON
18 93
CONTENTS.
PAO.
1. SONNET-DANTE, 1
A
DANTE AND SWEDENBORG.
1.
DANTE has been read and re-read, translated and
commented upon, now for five centuries. But has
any one ever undertaken to discover how much of
truth there is in Dante?
Perhaps the age for seeking the truth in any-
thing is gone by? Rather, the scientist would be
likely to say, it has never come, till now. For ages,
it would seem as if the world had never seriously
asked for the truth regarding the spiritual world, and
that which must constitute by far the most impor-
tant part of man's life and destiny. In Dante's own
time, if we may judge from Boccaccio's comments
on his life and his great poem, theology and poesy
were regarded as occupying nearly the same rank
in importance and in authority. Even the dogmatic
assertions of the church respecting the unseen world
were regarded with a kind of ceremonial respect,
as if they belonged to a class of things more
fictitious than reaI, sacred fictions, indeed, but still
fictions, like the myths of old and the tales of the
poets.
In the history of literature there have been
produced works which, while not claiming to be
Dante and Sweden60rg. 3
the utterances of revelation, have yet occupied a
place of authority and influence resembling that
which is accorded to the Divine oracles themselves.
Such, for instance, was the whole system of the
Platonic philosophy, but especially the doctrine
concerning the spiritual and intellectual nature or
man and the immortality of the soul 5uch we may
say has been the position allotted to the Div;NQ
Commedia of Dante, and perhaps, in less degree, to
the Paradise Lost of Milton. While not accepted
as Divine revelations on these hidden subjects, they
have been regarded as a treasury of consecrated and
hallowed fictions-d.escriptions which if not true are
about as likely ta he true as anything wc can know
on the subject, and as thercfore good substitutes for
the ttuth where no absolute or demonstrated truth
is to he obtained on the subjects in question. 50
have grown up, as Swedenborg describes such
phenomena in the world of spirits, a whole system
of artificial heavens and hells and their hierarchies,
having no immediate basis in anything revealed,
and yet held in popular religious estimation as
practically about as valid as revelation itself.
Says Milman in his History ofLatin Clm·stianity,
Book xiv. ch. 2,-a passage quoted by Longfellow
in the notes to his translation of the DiVlna
Commedia :
.. Throughout the Middle Ages the world after death
continue<! ta reveal more and more fully ils awful secrets.
Hel!. Purgatory, Heaven became more distinct, if it may
be so Illid, more visible. Their site, their topography,
4 Dante and Swedenborg.
their tonnents, their trials, their enjoyments, became
more conceivable, almost more palpable to sense: tiU
Dante summed up the whole of this traditional lore, or at
least, with a Poet's intuitive sagacity, seized on aIl which
was most imposing, effective, real, and condensed it in his
three co-ordinate poems. That HeU had a local existence,
that immaterial spirits suffered bodily and material
torments, none, or scarcely one hardy speculative mind,
presumed to doubt. . • .
"The medireval HeU had gathered from aU ages, aU
lands, aIl races, its imagery, its denizens, its site, its
access, its commingling horrors; from the old Jewish
traditions, perhaps from the regions beyond the sphere of
the Old Testament; from the Pagan poets, with their
black rivers, their Cerberus, their boatman and his crazy
vessel; perhaps from the Teutonic Hela, through sorne of
the early visions. Then came the great Poet, and reduced
all this chaos to a kind of order, moulded it up with the
cosmical notions of the times, and made it, as it were,
one"with the prevalent mundane system. Abo~e aU, he
brought it to the very borders of our world; he made
the life beyond the grave one with our present life; he
mingled in close and intimate relation the present and
the future. Hen, Purgatory, Heaven, were but an
immediate expansion and extension of the present
world. . . .
cc. • • Of that which HeU, Purgatory, Heaven, were in
popular opinion during the Middle Ages, Dante was but
the full, deep, concentred expression; what he embodied
in verse, aU men believed, feared, hoped."
The actual validity of these speculations and their
influence as touching the religious life of men must
always dependJ- however, on the amount of super-
natural authority ascribed to them or the amount of
revelation recognized in them, and, therefore, first of
aIl, on the amount and ki~d of truth recognized in
Da~le aod Swede..oorg. 5
revelation itself. It is a question whether the
Platonic philosophy, even its sublime doctrine of
the soul's immortality, exerted a strictly religious
etrect on the Hellenic people until after the Christian
Church had in a sense accepted, approved, and
given it its supreme sanction. 1n other wards,
Platonism did its refining, spiritualizing, and ete-
vating work more after the Christian theologians
accepted it as a precious vehicle of the church',
teaching than it had ever done before. What it
needed was a standard br which the actual truth
in it might he estimated, and 50 admiration for it as
a philosophy be turnf1d into reverence (or it as
rcvelation. This standard was round in the Gospel
of Christianity. That it had meanwhile exerted a
certain intellectual influence of the highest import-
ance in preparing, not ooly the Hellenic world, but
the whole rnind of the intelligent world at that
perlod, for ils future reception orthe revea.led Word,
cannot he questioned; rather we may say it was an
indispensable forerunner sent by the Divine Provi-
dence Cor this training of the "understanding, 50
that it migbt he elevated into the Iight of heaven,"
cven while the will of humanity lay still degradcd
iD its 100t and helpless condition.
ln an article elsewhere on the" ltalian Renaissance
in Its Relation to the Lord's Second Advent," 1 en·
deavour ta show how these extraordinary intel1cc·
t1IaI iUuminations have preceded alike, and in bath
instances by a period of about four centuries, the
two immediate revelations of Divine truth to man-
kind, namel)", that of the Incarnation, and that of
the opening of the Spiritual Sense of the Word,
which constitute in spiritual reality the first and the
~ond Advents of the Lord; and that the wide
prevalence of Hellenic culture, which anticipated
the first coming of the Lord as the W ord made
Flesh, has its remarkable counterpart in "the intel-
lectual influence of the ltalian Renaissance or the
revival of leaming in preparing the ,vorld for the
reception of that deeper revelation of the Word in
His Second Coming, which has enabled the Church
to cc enter intellectually into the things of faith."
Referring the reader to the following essays for
a treatment of this subject in its broader aspects, 1
wish in the present paper to examine in the briefest
possible scope the part which Dante's Com,nedia
has had to play in this providential course of the
world'g education, and the estimate ,,~ are to put
upon the description he gives us of the life aCter
death. While not contributing directly to the
. Revival of Learning, the great Italian epic may he
said to he a summary of all the learning of that
lime, whether astrological. geographical. poli tical,
1 theological, or moral. It is not 50 much a poem as
a great realistic picture of the ,,·hole universe, spiri-
tual and natural, as it then stood clearly outlined in
the vie,,· of the mighty intellect of its author. The
language in which it ,vas ,vritten became thereby
elevated to the dignity of a literary tongue to he
honoured by a glorious succession of poets,
7
biItorians, and phllosophers; white the subjcct.
matter became, as above described, a kind of
universa1ly acceptcd Il working hypothesis" regard.
!ng the nature of the spiritual world, whereby the
great gap in autbentic dogmatic teaching was con-
veniently filled out in a manner suited ta the
imaginative wants of the people, and to the practical
demands of moral and re1igious discipline. By a
comparison with such works as Milton's Paradisl
lAst and Bunyan's Pümm's Progrus, wc can fonn,
1 belicve, an approximate estimate of the aetual
eR'ect. produced by this grand epic of the unseen
werlcl upon the popular religious mind, not ooly of
contemporary, but of succeeding generations.-
remembering too, as wc must, that Dante prcceded
IlUton by a period as long as that (rom the discovery
of America by Columbus to the end of the Revolu-
tIonary War.
Referring to the analogy briefty alluded to above,
1 tbink wc shall find a dose resemblance between
the kind of authority hitherto attributed to Dante's
ftsions of the ather world, and that which, before
the Christian ua, was attributed to the teachings of
Socrates and Plato in relation to the life afterdeath.
According 10 the Iight of the time, thcse visions
wen:: neither improbable nor unreasonable; not only
DOt contrary to Scripture, they seemed like the
Wdest literai confirmation of the teaching of both
... BIble and the Church Fathers. Still there wu
MCb in them that could he traced directly to no
-.ed toW'CC of authority, and this sometimes
8 Dante and Swedenborg.
embraced principles of vast and fundamental
importance. How much, then, of truthful informa-
tion might men really look for in this vastly popular
allegory, this great myth that has been throwing its
awful lustre, now bright, now dark, over the groping
thoughts of the Christian \vorld during the centuries
that preceded the Lord's Second Advent?
To this question no answer could be given but by
comparing the visions of Dante with something that
could be accepted as a standard of truth on these
same subjects, and such a standard could only he
round in Revelation. But, as Revelation, beyond the
bare indications of a few broad, general truths on
the subject of the judgment and heaven and hell,
has been believed to contain no particulars regarding
the life after death, therefore there has been for the
Christian Church no means ofestimating the amount
of actual truth in Dante's description of heaven,
purgatory, and hell.
In a state of similar doubt, or mere guessing at
the reality, in regard to which there is no accepted
standard of revealed truth, stands the world at the
present day except for such as receive the revelation
given in the writings of Emanuel Swedenborg.
This messenger and servant of the Lord has, so he
avers, been permitted by the Lord to enter that
hitherto hidden world, and to tell now in plain,
unpoetical, and unfanciful terms the facts regarding
its nature, its order, its govemment, and its life.
For the first time are men, in the possession ofthese
writings, possessed of a standard whereby, on the
na"te aM Swedenborg. 9
ground of their authenticity, they may, with an
accoracy and a certainty no less than scient.ific,
determine the amount of truth reatly embodied in
the visions of Dante.
It is not for a moment to be understood that
Dante ever gave his visions forth as other than pure
poetry, or as having more than an allegoric hasis
of truth; nor that the world has ever formally
sanctioned them as having anything of a super·
natural charader; neither has it done 50 with
Milton or Bunyan; and yet who will say that the
religious thought and the anticipations of the other
life of Protestant Christian minds for the past two
centuries, have not been greatly tingcd by the
reRections cast from the imaginations of these two
writers? 50 with Dante, while neither professedly
prophet nor secr, nor pope, nor doctor of theology ;
yet in reality the power of his great poem has been
that of all these combined in colouring the thoughts
and affections of men in their visions of the world to
come And, while granting to Dante his full title
of poet as a truly great creator of thesc imaginary
worlds through which hc leads us in his awful
pilgrimage, yet even the imagination must have
some matcrial, and sorne scaffolding of information,
of former doctrine or knowledge of sorne kind, on
which and with which to build. And it is this
question as to fundamental sources of Dante's
ideas of the spiritual world that chiefty interests
Us in attempting a comparison between Dante and
Swedenborg.
10 Dante and Swedenborg.
The natu raI inference would he that Dante, in
writing an account of an imaginary pilgrimage
through heU and purgatory and heaven, would
descrihe those realms according to the vulgar con-
ceptions then entertained, something as the miracle
plays have done, or that the common traditions of
the church and the few grand hints of the literaI
Scriptures would have sufficed for the material to
he employed. As a matter of fact, we find, in one
sense, the heaven and the heU of Dante a very
narrow, commonplace, every-day kind of world;
more so even than that of the Memorable Relations,
or those interviews with spirits and descriptions of
the scenery of the spiritual world which Sweden-
borg has interspersed in the course of his doctrinal
writings. The people that Dante meets with in
that world are his former over-the-way, Florentine
neighbours, who inquire about their relatives, or wish
to be informed as to the progress of public alfairs
in their quarrelsome little town. The rewards
and punishments of etemityare dispensed very con-
siderably according to the poet's own resentment
or favour towards his former political associates;
the scenery, the manners and customs, the cour-
tesies and the jeers and insults he meets with are
aU reftected from the narrow sphere of north
Italian life. When we come to broader subjects,
we find indeed the poet's vision and grasp widening
accordingly, but stiU subject to the limitations of
traditional learning.
Thus his cosmology and geography are those of
DMlt, a..a Sweikn6org-. Il
1
20 Dante and Swedenborg.
human mind. These degrees are thus described br
Swedenborg :
cc He who does not know how it is with Divine order as
to degrees, cannot comprebend how the heavens are dis-
tinct, nor even what the internaI and the external man
are. Most people in the world have no other notion
conceming interiors and exteriors, or concerning superiors
and inferiors, than as of something continuous or of
what coheres by continuity from purer to grolser; and
yet interiors and exteriors are not continuous with each
other but discrete. There are degrees of two kinds;
there are continuous degrees and degrees not continuous.
Continuous degrees are as the degrees of the decrease of
light from flame even to its obscurity; or as the degrees
of the decrease of sight, from those things which are in
light to those which are in shade; or as the degrees of
the purity of the atmosphere, from the lowest part of it
to the highest: distances determine these degrees. On
the other hand, degrees not continuous, but discrete, are
discriminated as prior and posterior, as cause and etrect,
as what produces and what is produced. He who ex-
amines will see, that in all and each of the things in the
universa1 world, whatever they are, there are such degrees
of production and composition; namely, that from one is
another, and from the other a third, and so on. He who
does Dot procure to himself a perception of these degrees
cannot possibly know the distinctions of the heavens,
and the distinctions of the interior and exterior faculties
of man; nor the distinction between the spiritual world
and the natural world; nor the distinction between the
spirit of man and his body. Hence he -cannot under-
stand what and whence correspondences and representa-
tions are, nor what influx is. Sensual men do not com-
prehend these distinctions, for they make increments and
decrements even according to these degrees, continuous ;
hence they cannot conceive of what is spiritual otberwise
than as apurer natural. • . .
Da~le arui SwedeMorg. 21
i
ell' and al80 it is a Middle state of man aCter deatb.
t it ill a middle place, WH manifeat to me from thit,
the hells are beneath, and the heavens aOOve; and
it is a middle state, from this. that man, 50 long u
.. tbere, is not yet in heaven or in hell. The ltale
,"ea,ven with man is the conjunction of good and trutb
..... bim, and the slate of heU is the conjunction of ml
.... fabity with him. When with a man-spirit good
... joined to truth, then he comes inta heaven, beaUIe,
.. said, that conjunction is heaven witb him; but
with a man·spirit evil is conjoined with l'alIit,.,
22 Da"'e and Swedenborg.
then he cornes iota heU, because that conjunclion is heU
with him. This conjunction Is made in the world of
spirits, since man is thcn in a middle statc. It Is alike,
whether you say the conjunction of the understanding
and the will, or the conjunction of truth and good "
(Héflflen and Rdl, no. 4U).
1
III.
THE HELLS.
"',
as ber IOD .sinet ail in Iiim b Di'll:le" (Tnu CÀn"sl;/UI. RigiMt,
~
Dante and Swedenborg. 57
.
"THE SPIRITUAL SENSE OF DANTE."*
A REVIEW.
l
Tire Spiritual Sense of Dante. 67
borg defines it as progress through the three stages
or degrces of: knowledge (sa'mtia), intelligence,
and wisrlom ; and as contemplating in these, respec-
tively: cffects, causes, and ends. Thus in the Divine
LAvt and Wisdtmt, no. 202, he says: "Ta think
from cnds is of wisdom: to think from causes
is of intelligence: to think from effects is of
science."
" Could a man become," says Dr. Harris, "50 weIl
acquaintcd with principles as to habitually make
his knowledgc a deduction from first principlcs, he
would then know by 'pure illumination' as angels
are said to know." In the passage of Dante to
which Dr. Harris rerers for illustration of this
knowing, wc do not see defined, although it may
be symbolized, this deduction from first principles.
What Dante actually says is in correction of those
who have asserted that the angels "can hear, re·
collect, and will;" and he would describe, in its
purity, that truth which men on earth see and
teach only confusedly :
These substaneesfthe angelslsinee in Cod's countenanœ
They jocund were, tumed not away their sight
From that wherefrom not anything is hidden ;
Henee tbey have not their vision intercepted
By abject new, and hence tbey do not need
Ta recollect, tbrouKh interrupted thought.
50 that, belo"", people do dream, awake,
Believing they speak truth, and not believing,
And in the last is greater sin and shame.
Below you do not joumey in one path,
Philosophizing: 50 transporteth you
Love of .ppearance and the thought thereof.
68 The SjJz-ritua/ Sense of Dante_
And even this, above here, is endured
With less disdain, than when is set aside
The Holy Writ, or when it is distorted.
They think not there how much of blood it costs
To sow it in the world, and how he pleases
Who in humility keeps close to il.
Each striveth for appearance and doth make
His own inventions: and these treated are
By preachers, while th' Evangel holds its peace.
(Paradiso XXIX. 76-96.)
Any one will find here a suggestion of the pas-
sage of the W ord where are described the "pure in
heart who see God," and the little children " \vhose
angels do always behold the face of My Father
in heaven," and of those things which are" hidden
from the wise and prudent, but are revealed unto
babes," and especiaUy when by these infantile
states, are understood, as Swedenborg explains,
~e innocence of the third or celestial degree of the
angelic heavens. The angelic and human knowing
is described by Swedenborg as progressing through
three discrete planes or degrees-the natura], which
is 'knowledge of effects and appearances of truth ;
the spiritual, which is knowledge of causes or the
spiritual laws controlling aU natural phenomena;
the celestial, which is knowledge of ends, or what
Dr. Harris caUs the first principles_ Swedenborg
says of the several planes of the angelic know-
ledge:
cc The thoughts of the angels of the highest or third
heaven are thoughts of ends, those of the second heaven
are those of causes, those of the lowest or first heaven
Tke Spiritual Sense 0/ Dante. 69
are those of effects, . . . The angels of the lower heavens
think about causes and about ends; the angels of the
higher heavens think (rom causes and Crom ends"
. (Divine Love and Wùdo11l, no. 202).
1
72 The SjJz·ritual Sense of Dante.
lation and philosophy are named as the available
means to this end. But according to Dr. Harris
these means are not co-ordinate; philosophy is the
prior and chief, and religion the secondary and in-
strumental means. Or we may better say that, as
philosophy, this knowledge of the truth is the self-
thinking of pure reason, rather than the contempla-
tion of a Divine revelation to the finite mind. Dr.
Harris spéaks of ·the cc world view of Christianity "
as that of "nature and human history as a revela-
tion of Divine reason." To him Beatrice is the
symbol at once of Divine knowledge, Christian
theology, or revelation, and so of philosophy,
because aIl these mean "the insight into a Divine
Reason as First Cause," and as cc Reason is Divine
Human" the contemplation of this is the" vision of
Gocl " (p. 112). But the doctrine of the Logos, or
the Word, and of the operation of these both in
creation and redemption as weB as that of the
Holy Spirit or "the institutional Spirit" CP. 135),
are traced by Dr. Harris from Aristotle and Plato
down through the Alexandrian mysticism to St.
John and St. Paul. The redemption and the Re-
deemer of the Gospels seem therefore to be the
mythos, which is the representative, symbolic, and
religious form of the absolute truth, rather than the
truth itself: Christianity seems to be evolved from
philosophy rather than philosophy from Christianity
as itself the highest and fullest Divine revelation,
the "Word made Flesh in whom we behold the
Only-Begotten of the Father full of grace and
The Spir#ual Sense of Da.te. 73
truth." Of the cvolution or self·development of the
Logos, Dr. Harris says :
.. In religious symbolism He is spoken of as redeeming
finÎte beillgs through His incarnation and death on the
CTOSS. This expresses symbolic:l.lly the aet of the Logos
in creation" (p. 138).
Thus the rcdemption of man through the over-
throwing of the dominion of the hells by Jesus
Christ in His warfarc in our flesh and in the glaTi-
(ying of His Humanity, becomcs, apparently, ooly
one of the farms of that my/Iros or religious sym-
bolism which poets use to convey the truths of the
highest wisdom revealed to their philosophy. In
the same way the mY/Ms of the three worlds-hell,
purgatory, and heaven - are traccd down (rom
Homer, through Plata and Virgil to Dante, and in
this \Vay this worid poem is represented as the
sensuous or representative fonn in which the Divine
idea embodies itself in the conceptions of art,religion,
and philosophy. Singularly, in all this, the funda·
mental ground of Dante's gTeat pocm is set aside to
make way for the Hegelian interpretation of it.
The ground of Dante's theology is the Revelation
of the Christian Scoptures and the traditions of
the Catholic Church. If in their literaI form these
rcvelations are symbolic, it is the Divine Ward itself,
and neither 1[omer nor Plata, that has dictated the
choice of symbols, and sa an infinite truth ties within
them.
Such is the teaching of Swedenborg, who in
giving the "spiritual sense" of the Word daims to
74 Tiu SjJz·ntual Sense of Dante.
give not the self-revealing of his own reason, but
revelations vouchsafed to him by God Himself;
equally in his visions of the hellsJ of the intermediate
world, and of heaven, Swedenborg declares that aIl
that he saw was truly symbolic or representative,
corresponding exactly to the interior qualities and
states of spirits and angels there. These repre-
sentatives resulted from the very law of spiritual
creation itself, or the correspondence existing
between cause and effect, between the spiritual and
the natural worlds. The" spiritual sense" of the
Word, or of any symbol or representation grounded
in the Divine law of correspondence, means there-
fore the truth of the spiritual world or world of
causes lying within the truth as it " appears" in the
world of nature or of literaI revelation. The angels
and spirits in the spiritual world are in these higher
truths, and therefore perceive the vast number and
the vast reach of truths which are contained within
each literai truth of the Word. Those angels are
in the knowledge of Divine ends which are nearest
God, or are in the celestial or highest heavens;
they are therefore in the deepest senses of the truth
embodied in the letter of holy Scripture, but their
attainment of the highest knowledge is not a pro-
cess of philosophizing, but the result of the real
illumination which is given in heaven to those who
see God, that is to the pure in heart. In Sweden-
borg the Lord and the Word stand first as the
sources of revelation itself: and the elementary
principles of the spiritual rational faculty.
The Spiritual Sense 0/ Dan/e. 75
These and the knowledge of the spiritual world
ex vins et auditis, arc the elementary but inductive
knowledges, to he "Ieamed (rom without," (rom
which as the basis of a great Divine science, the
deductive principles of a truc philosophy are to be
obtained. With these fixed knowledges of the
truc, because Divinely given, symbols, we nem
"not go by various paths in our philosophizing,"
as we are sure to do if we accept as the symbols of
truth every imaginingofthe poet, and every vagary
of Christian dogmatists. 1n this case it has too
often happened that
Each striveth for appearance, and dolh malte
Its own inventions; but these treated are
By preachers. and the Gospel holds its peace 1
What we find (ault with, therefore, in Dr. Harris,
is not his regarding ail literal rcvelation as in a
sense symbolical or representative, for this must he
the case. Swedenborg says :
" By m~ans of his natural rnind being elevated iota the
light of beaY~n, a man can think with the ang~ls, yea,
speak with them; but the thought and speech of the
angels then flow iota the Datural thought and speech of
the man, and oot cOlltrariwise. Humao wisdom can by
no Oleans he elevated into ange1ic wisdom. but only iDto •
certain image of it " (DiviM.Lovt alUi Will/om, no. 257).
But the defect lies in there being no apparent
tine of demarcation betweell the Divine and revealed
symbolism of the Word and the arbitrary symbolism
of the poets and the philosophers as such. If thcse
latter are true, we would trace them not to the
general intuitive power of the human reason, but
to a Divine source in sorne special earlier revelation.
To the existence of such earlier revelations of the
supernatural world to the human race, in ages pre-
historic, but which have yielded, through various
channels, their contributions to what ·may seem now
the natural inheritance of the human reason, Mr.
Gladstone alludes in an article cited elsewhere in
this volume:
• • • • le It is of the deepest interest to ex-
amine whether in any and what particulars, now recog-
nized by Christians as undoubted portions of revealed
truth, those religions (of the Assyrians and Egyptians)
were more advanced and more enlarged than the religion
of the favoured race. . . . No doubt if it be
found that these extraneous and independent religions
taught in any point more {ully than the Hebrews what
Christians now acknowledge, this will he for Christians a
new and striking proof that, in the infancy of the race
of Adam, and before ils distribution over the earth, the
Almighty imparted to it precious knowledges which it
could hardly have discovered and was but indifferently
able to retain." .
Swedenborg did not invent the punishments of
the hells or the paradises of hèaven from any im-
agination of his own. He beheld these things as
real creations not of his imagining, but as created
by the one Creator. Speaking of objects seen about
the angels in heaven, Swedenborg says :
cc AU these things exist according to the affections and
thence the thoughts of the angels, for theyare correspon-
The Spin1ual Sense of Dante. 77
dcnces; and because things tbat correspond make one
with that to which tbey correspond, they are therefore an
image representative of it. They do not exist
aTound the man-angel {rom the ange!, but from the Lord
through the angel; {or tbey exist from the influx of the
Divine Love and Wisdom of the Lord into the angel
who i5 a recipient. and before whose sight it i5 ail
produced Iike the creation of a universe!" (Divine
LorJt and Wùdom, nos. 3::2, 326).
It might look indee<! as if this kind of creation
were identical with that which the Hegelians ascribe
to the Divine reason. and which is the source. ae·
cording to Dr. Harris, of the myths in the great
world poets, and 50 of the visions which Dante
describes. The supreme rcasan operating through
the poet's mind produces thus its mythical, sym-
bolic world. But the defcct thatseems to belong to
this conception is, that the abject thus crcated is but
a myth, haviog its existence ooly in the human
consciousness or contemplation, and not in sub-
stantia! rcality or facto The symbolic myths,
however truc and admirable, would seem to lcave
us, if we read Dr. Harris 'aright, without any actual
heaven, hell, or intermediate world, as the sure
destination of himself and ourselves, to he reached
by us in a few years from now ; and cqually with·
out anyactual historie incarnation of Deity in the
persen of Jesus Christ, and 50 any actual battles
fought by Him with the bells for our deliverance
from the power of accumulated evil will-without
any wrÎUen rcvelation, and without any visible
Churcb. In place of these as fads the Hegelian
78 Tiu Sp,:ritual Sense of Dante.
philosophy seems to content itself with the con-
templation of them as ideas or representations
created in the imaginations of the human mind,
or as what Swedenborg designates as merely an
ens rationis, having no ultimation in the plane of
actual effect. To inquire into the spiritual sense of
things that are, or actually have been, is to make a
step forward in our learning; but to find a spiritual
sense in things that have no being but as fictions of
the reason in human imaginations, can add but
little of practical value to our stock of information.
Dante's mention of the angels as those who
cc happy in God's countenance turn never away,"
reminds one of Swcdenborg's staternent in Heaven
and Hell, that cc the reigning love is the origin of
all determinations with angels and spirits, and as
this love is constantly before their faces, and the
face exists from the interiors, therefore that love
which reigns is always before their face," and which-
ever way they turn "the East is ever before their
eyes-the whole heaven turning itself toward the
Lord as its cornmon centre." Aiso in the Divine
Providence (no. 29), he says: cc AlI the angels turn
their faces to the Lord, but not of themselves, but
the Lord turns them to Himself through an influx
into their life's love, and so into their perceptions
and thoughts." As to the superiority of the angelic
wisdom, Swedenborg says, cc It is so ineffable, that
only one of a thousand ideas in the thought of the
angels from their wisdom, can come into the thought
of men from their wisdom."
Tlu Spin~ual Sense 0/ Da"te. 79
As to the means of attaining this wisdom, there-
fore, far (rom its being the result of philosophizing,
Swedenborg declares that no onc cao come iota
this ineffable wisdom of the angels except through
conjunction with the Lord and according to it.
.. The angels cao reccive sucb great wisdom because
they are devoid of self-love, and being witheut this,
the heavenly loves in which they are, open the
interiors, because thcse loves arc from the Lord,
and in them is the Lord HimselC" (Heavm and
Htll, no. 27I).
How ineffable is angelic wisdom may he iIlus-
trated by $wedenborg's statement that, .. In one
angelic ward there are innumerable things that
cannot he expressed at all in the \Vards of human
language, for in each ward that angels speak there
are arcana of wisdom in a continuous connection to
which human sciences nevcf'" attain" (Ibid., 269).
And although in heaven .. aH long for wisdom and
have an appetite fof'" it, yet the infinite or the
perfect wisdom is never attained," for although
"the angels are continually being perfected in
wisdom, still to eternity they cannot be 50 far per-
fected that there can be any proportion between
their wisdom and the Divine wisdom of the Lord"
(Ibid., 273). Man may therefore forever approach
but never attain to the pencet reason; al the same
time from the revelation of the Divine end or
principle, even man in his humblest estate on earth
may sec earthly and temporal things in the Iight of
heaven and of the ctemal wisdom.
..
80 The Sjrin·tua/ Sense of Dante.
It is not through the intuitions of reason, but by
saintly guidance and the great light of Christian
theology, that Dante acknowledges, in the last
canto of the Paradiso, that he has been led ta
the vision of the Supreme Good and True which
caUs forth this rapturous song of adoration :
o Light Supreme, that dost so far uplift thee
From the conceits of mortals, to my mind
Of what thou didst appear re-Iend a little,
And make my tongue of so great puissance,
That but a single sparkle of thy glory
It may bequeath unto the future people;
For by returning to my memory somewhat,
And hy a little sounding in these verses,
More of thy victory shaH be conceived !
1 think the keenness of the living ray
Which 1 endured would have bewildered me,
If but mine eyes had been averted from it;
And 1 remember that 1 was more bold
On this account to bear, so that 1 joined
My aspect with the Glory Infinite.
o grace abundant, by which 1 presumed
To fix my sight upon the Light Eternal,
So that the seeing 1 consumed therein !
1 saw that in its depth far down is lying,
Bound up with love together in one volume
What through the universe in leaves is scattered;
Substance, and accident, and their operations,
AlI interfused together in such wise
That what 1 speak of is one simple Light.
(Paradi'so XXXIII. 67-90.)
GREEK PHILOSOPHY IN ITS RELATION
TO THE LORD'S FIRST ADVENT.
•
94 Itatian Renaissamt ,n Ils Relation
only of the Greek language, but of the pagan Greek
Iiterature and pagan philosophy into the learning
of Latin or Western Europe. Pico della Mirandola,
Petrarch, Ficino, Boccaccio, and others, seized upon
the treasures of Greek pagan litcrature which the
pocr scholars, driven from the east by the inroads
of the ever-advancing Turks, had brought with
them to the hospitable doors of the wealthy
Florentine patrons of learning, like nuggets of gold
or strings of pearls washed up on the shore after the
wreck of a costly merchantman. Greck leaming
was the fashion of the day j Greek grammars and
lexicons hegan to he elaborated and published i
Plato's philosophy began to he placed high above
the theology of the Christian {athers j and the
Greek poets, their mythology and maraIs, began to
either supplant-or, more frequently, transfonn
into semblances of themselves-the religion, the
superstitions, and the worship of the Church. Hos~
tHe as this pagan revival may scem at first thought
to the Christianity of the timc, it was not more 90
than the Hellenism of old to the Jews in the time
of the Maccabees j and just as the Greek language
became the vehiclc of the revelation of the whole
Word to the nOIl-Hebraic world, sa did it now again
become the vehicle of its new dissemination, through
the revived study of the Ward in i15 original fonns,
the translation of its multiplied texts into the vari~
ous popular languages of Europe, and i15 publica~
tion by the now newly-invented printing-press.
Hither then to Florence, in these days of the
to tlu Lord's Seeond A dvent. 95
intcllectual new birth of Europe, came the scholars
of England and France and Germany. Erasmus,
More, Colet, Melancthon, and Reuchlin drank alike
at the pure source of the Grcek texts of the New
Testament hcrc brought to light; and those
draughts of new mental vigeur and life were ta
set a11 Europe astir in the pursuit of a deeper
and trucr knowledge of the fundamental racts of
Christianity. Not ooly began now a sifting of old
traditions and dogmas in the light of the newly.
Cound standards of revelation j but the stimulus of
this new leaming-or, rather, of this cil! learning
revived, because released (rom the restraints of
bigotry and superstition-had set minds to enquiT-
ing in every direction, and science and invention,
and the various industries and arts belonging to our
modern civilization, began now a course of refined
developmenL The religious and political upheavals
that accompanied the Italian Renaissance are evi-
dences indeed of something more than any mere
intellectual in8uence. The reformation preached by
Savonarola in Florence was in many senses a far
more genuinely religious movement than that of
Luther and of John Knox; and while it attracted
the attention of Lorenzo de Medici and the Pla-
tonists of bis court, it can hardly he said to bave
owed anything to either Greek texts or pagan
leaming. The fermentations, the terrible disturb-
anees attending the breaking up of an old and
corrupted churcb, were beginning even then te
make tbemselves fclt in the spiritual world. and
96 Italian Renaissance ln lts Relation
thence in socièty in aU its forms upon earth: but,
at the same time, in the ordering of Divine Provi-
dence, while everything was becoming only more
corrupt and demoralized in the voluntary and
affectional part, in the intellectual part of society
there was a quickened life, a process of cleansing,
repairing, and putting in order; so that in. this
renewed or reformed intellect of Christendom the
truth to be revealed in the Lord's Second Advent
might at length find a suitable abiding-place, and
so help to the birth of a new will, the restoration of
a living Church on earth once more. The agen-
cies of ~his intellectual renewal were, as 1 have
said, chiefly the stimulus afforded by the fresh
delight of contact with pagan myth, art, poetry,
and philosophy, consequent upon the introduction
of Greek letters from .the east; the access this
afforded also to the books of the New Testament
in their original tongue; the awakening of the
critical spirit, and the sense of freedom in matters
of helief; and, finally, the translation of the Bible
in various languages, and its dissemination through
the printing-press. These were not only means of p'
•
100 Itaiia" Re1UJÎJsMI&, i" üs ReJatiq"
Bible in ail the integrity of its letter, and freed
utterly from the shackles of traditionai interpretation
and the bias of the dogmas of the past. Ta provide
for the new age such an Absolutely free Bible geeU15
ta me the manifest Providenee.leading in ail the
history of Christendom, from the Italian Renais~
sance down ta the present day. The Bible bas
become itself, in one sense, an entirely new book i
new in its literai fonn, as translated into the various
modem languages; new in the manner of its use i
new in the senses in which it is studied and undet-
stood. Even though Swedenborg gave the doctrines
revealed from the internai sense of the Ward in the
Latin language, the home language of the old Of'
Roman Church, still in their ditrusion in the world
it is rather through those languages, once wholly
barbarous and pagan ta the Christian capital, the
English, German, French, and Scandinavian, that
the doctrines of the New Church, by which alone
the Ward is henceforth ta be understood, are made
known, as weil as the Divine text of the Ward it·
self. The English and the Dutch, whom Sweden.
borg places in the centre of the Christian world
because of their possession of the Ward and their
freedom of thought in religious things (Tnu C/Iris-
Iiatt Religion, nos. 800, 80;), were p::>ssessed of
neither of these qualifications, we may say, at the
time of the beginning of the Renaissance What
elevated them ta this high distinction was nothiog
but tbis new leaming which England, pre..eminently
among European nations, imbibed from the Floren·
to tlu Lor"'s Sec01UiAm-t. 101
.
102 Italian Re""issanee ,,·n ils Relation
the father's country-a struggle lasting through the
many long years of religious warfare which the
states of Europe have witnessed since the days of
the Reformation-this intelIectual state, so acquired,
may seem only partiaIly to meet aIl the conditions
of that Gentile world, cc remote from Christianity,"
to which the new dispensation seems to he particu-
larly promised (Last J-gment, no. 74). Yet,
viewed in the broad light of history, it assumes
more and more this character. If we remove
the idea of earthly distance and think of remote-
ness of state, nothing could he more remote from
former or even the present dogmatic Christianity
than just this attitude of the free intellect of
the modern civilized mind. It assumes aIl kinds
of guises; it .lives in aIl climes; it takes and
survives on aU kinds of food. One thing atone
it rejects; one country it shuns; one house it nevèr
seeks-namely, that of the old Christian theology
with its couneil-made dogmas, its falsifiedi Bible, its
irrational demands upon the human reason, its
offensiveness to the sense of morality alj1d justice.
The modem human intellect - freed ~from the
restraints of the past, equipped with the ~c forces of
the Gentiles" (Isa. Ix. S, II)-in its rich} stores of
natural knowledges and its ability t<i. explore
subjeets with philosophical insight, see1lllS to me
ta be the speeially-prepared ground in which the
seeds of the new dispensation are ta be sown. It
surely is not the ground of the still dog ma-bound
theologian of the existing Churches; n r is it thé
10 lM Lord's Sec01U/ Adveftl. 103
1
1 12 The New Renaissance.
And, as in the former great critical transitions of
the world, so it is now again the religious, that is
the vital change. At last, after eighteen centuries,
the Pauline interpretation of Christianity, based
upon a lawyers reading.of the letter of the Gospel,
is to give place to a revelation of the Divine Doc-
trine contained within the Word itself: No longer
stagnant, the whole vast surface of religious
thought is now being stirred; so that on the stan-
dard which the closing century holds up to our
gaze as she wanders back in the long ranks of the
departed ages, if there is any record the world can
read more unmistakably than another, it is that
which proclaims her to the future historian as the
century of the making over of religion.
1t is not the revision of the creeds, the cc higher
criticism JI of the Bible, nor any movement eccle-
siastical or ritualistic among the various Christian
denominations,that constitutes this newage-forming
movement. These are all only special and inci-
dental phases of religious life among the organized
sects of the Christian Church. But the new reli-
gious movement embraces those without :as weIl as
those within the communion of the Church, and it
extends its thrilling impulse into all avenues of
human life and interest of the present day. Olt stirs
in the mind of the inventor, the artist, the writer,
the musician, the scholar, and the statesman.
Realistic to the most unsparing degree, it lays bare
the life of society as never did a Judgment Day
before. It removes concealments and conventional
Tiu New Renaissance. 113
•
118 Tiu New Renaissance.
in the revelation of God Himself to men; that, in
other words, just as the former great epochs of the
world have been marked by a Coming of God ta
man and the execution of a great spiritual judg-
ment in this world, so at this time we are witnessing
nothing less sublime than the promised S~ond
Advent of the Lord and the consequent crisis or
Last Judgment, by which the whole intellectual and
moral world is being made new and the former
things are passing away. What we now are wit-
nessing is indeed only the result, in this mundane
sphere, of a general judgment already executed in
the world of spirits, whereby new influences from
heaven are descending into mankind, and greater
capacities are being imparted to men for their
human development into the true stature of a
man, ce which is that of an angel."
This Second Advent of the Lord is not an advent
in person, in any physical or material sense, but is
purely a spiritual advent in the revelation to men .
of the Divine Truth of the Word or written revelation
by opening to man's knowledge their heretofore
hidden, spiritual meaning, and at the same time by
opening the eyes of a Divinely chosen messenger ta
the vision of the reality of the spiritual world, of
heaven, the intermediate world, and hell, and so the
soIving of the mystery of death and the problem of
the goal of human life. The world's new birth amid
which we are living and which all Churches and
schooIs and govemments are recognizing, is there-
fore, according to Swedenborg, the rea1ization of
Tiu New Renaissante. 119
the prophetie vision of the Revelation: "Behold a
new heaven and a new earth,"-but it is equally a
fulfilmcnt of that whieh the Churches and the
historians have not known or not ret:ognized,
namely, that Second Coming of the Lord without
which no ncw earth is promised and no Holy City
descends to earth from God out of heaven.
Startling as has becn Swedenborg's daim to
intromission into the spiritual world and an open
vision of its reality and its distinct nature and life,
far more stupendous is the assertion that the Word
is revcaled anew and the Lord's promised Set:ond
Advent accomplished in the opening of the spiritual
• sense of the Scriptures and the revelation of the
Law of Discrete Degrees showing in what manner
matter stands rclated to spirit, the oatural to the
spiritual world, and, accordingly, the natural or
literai sense of Scripture to its internai and spiritual
meaning. 1t is not theology, in its former narrow
sense, that is now made new; but here is gjvcn the
foundatîon for a new philosophy, a new science, a
new human society, a new world. This is therefore
an age-fonning revelation. lts power is that of a
Divine Zeil Geul, a breath which bloweth where it
Iisteth, and the world hears the sound thereof, but
cannot tell whence it cometh or whither it goeth.
50 is this new birth of the Spirit which the race is
now undergoing. The theology of Swedenborg,
ignored alike, officially, by thealogian, scientist, and
hierarch, is nevertheless the heaven that is changing
the face of ail Christendom and preparing the way
120 The New Renaissance.·
for a universal religion in whieh the Lord Jesus
Christ shaH dweII as in " His tabernacle with men;
and they shaH he His people, and Gad Himself shall
be with them their God."
No longer separated from them in awful remote-
ness, but present with them in an acknowledged
system of Divine Truth and of Divine and heavenly
law, men shaH realize the fact of the Divine pre-
sence on earth, of the spiritual within the natural,
of the kingdom of God as having passed from the
symbol of prophecy into praetical fulfilment
The ideal monarchy of Dante, with its Emperor
and its Pope, its State and its Church executing in
harmonious co-operation the will of the Divine
Ruler on earth, wiH have given place to the spiritual
realization of the Holy City deseending from Gad
out of heaven in a system of Divine doctrine re-
vealed to man's rational apprehension out of the
opened depths of the written Word, and constitut-
ing for aIl men the law of true human charity on
earth and the gate into the eternal citizenship of
the City of God above.
In this prophetie mission Swedenborg stands out,
his vision sweeping the horizon of the ages, and his
voice from the north telling us of the entering of
mankind upon the Fifth Age of the world. The
voice of the prophet is lost to men amid their
wonder at beholding the fulfilment of the things
foretold. Not indeed in a heaven already realized
on earth; but in the working out of the Divine
judgments, the discrimination and separation of
The New Renaissauce. 121
•
126 Faust zn Musu.
tive qualities of the more important musical settings
of the Faust-drama by our modern composers-
namely, those of Spohr, Gounod, Berlioz, Boïto, and
Schumann.
Remarkable as is the fact that this drama of the
ages, as the Faust-legend has been not unfitly called,
should have waited until the nineteenth Christian
century for its adequate literary embodiment; not
less so are the remarkable efforts in the same period
to give the legend a proper musical setting. The
intellectual and the emotional contents of the deeply
graved story find simultaneous utterance. It is in
this coïncidence of artistic endeavour that a very
interesting psychological phenomenon occurs, in,
namely, the exhibition here afforded of the power
of the musician to penetrate and seize the most
subtle phases of ethical and religious emotion, and to
give these due expression in his art. A comparison
of these several musical settings is therefore at the
same time a kind of psychological study of the
several composers. The effort will be not to
form any absolute judgment as to comparative
excellence, but to detect, as far as we may be able,
that peculiar moral and religious phase of the
drama which is emphasized in each of the musical
works under consideration.
1 have named Spohr at the head of the list
because his opera was the earliest to be produced,
and also requires the briefest notice here. It is
with sorne hesitation that 1 include him in the list
of interpreters of the "Faust-idea," for the reason
FallS! in Music.
that his Iibrettist's idea was as remote as possible
from that, at least, of Goethe, however earnestly it
may have re8ected some of the eruder medireval
versions of the legend. Faust, after going through
a number of exploits of very doubtful valour or
honour, is finally carried off triumphantly ta Hell,
amid the rejoicing shouts of the infernal hasts.
The story reads marc Iike the popular Don Juan of
other operas, and the music is alike sensational in
character, ha:rdly anywhere acquiring the dignity of
a moral import. The composition is by no means
without merit musically considered, several of the
soprano arias heing remarkable for their brilliancy,
and even to this day popular on the concert stage,
and here and there a deep strong pathos, com·
bined with sober purity of farm, reminds one even
of GlUck. But we do not think of this music as
belonging to the subjective school in which the real
opera alone finds its place-a school whose art is
barn of an idea c1early conceived in the mind and
afterwards shaping to itself a musical fonn as its
purcst and fullest manifestation. The music of
Spohr's .. Faust" might readily he sung ta the
librttti of many other operas of the time without
any apparent Jack of adaptation. It is pJeasant
Society-music, if we may use the term-a sort of
delicious and exhilarating accompaniment ta the
waving of perfumed fans, the drawing on of gloves,
bastily snatcbed glimpses of the brilliantly dressed
bouse, and a balf-suppressed murmur of gay con·
versation. If we could conccive of Faust as in the
128 Faust in Music.
modem sense a cc Society man," which somehow
we find it impossible to do, we might find this
somewhat flippant opera more deserving of study
than it at present seems to us.
With the other four compositions to which 1
invite attention, there is surely no lack of subjec-
tive and eamest content. It is doubtful if, except
. in the oratorios and sacred cantatas of the masters
of sacred music, there is manifest anywhere 50
eamest an intent in musical writing as we find in
these works-the "Faust" of Schumann and that
of Gounod, the "Damnation" of Berlioz, and the
cc Mefistofele" of Boïto. In none, with the excep-
tion of Schumann's "Scenes," is the text precisely
that of Goethe, but aU derive their theme from his
version of the legend, and follow his drama with
sufficient nearness to enable them to be judged as
by a common standard in their literary content
They differ so widely, however, in the special
theme or phase of the drama chosen by each com-
poser for musical setting, that they are rather to be
regarded as constituting together one complete
expression, than as 50 many various treatments of
a single subject. The deep intellectual insight
into the meaning of the -drama, and the vivid
realization of its successive great motives in the
language of tone by those writers, are a significant
indication of the real progress of the musical art.
In neither of these works is the dramatic theme
subordinated to the mere play of musical sounds.
It is everywhere true opera in the genuine sense,
FalUt i" Music. 12 9
i
t
,'.
i'
; :
".1.
il
1-
·. i·
>.. t,
l',: 1:
1: 1 "ALL THAT DOTH PASS AW A Y.'
":,,'
. . "Alles Verganliche ist nur ein Gleichniss."-Goethe•
~. ~ i:
",
:. i
J ALL that doth pass away is but the farm
, ! "
Reftected from the real that remains.
:':.,' "Tis 1 that bear within me peace and storm,
: ,
a
The world with aIl its losses and its gains.
, 1
Even the body's shape and all its sensè
Is but the mirror wherein 1 may scan
My inner self; but bear the mirror hence
Or break to atoms, still remains the man.
So death may change the outer circumstance
But to reveal the real world within,
And let me see, in one astonished glance,
The vision of my virtue or my sin ;
And going hence from out this shattered shell
1 carry with me my own heaven or hell.
..J
, .
1
;
~
,
1 .
1.
1
t.- ....;
....:
..
' ~:. )
THE BORROWER WILL BE CHARGED 1
AN OVERDUE FEE IFTHIS BOOK IS NOT
llETURNED TO THE L1BRARY ON OR
BEFORE THE LAST DATE STAMPED
BEWW. NON-RECEl PT OF OVERDUE
NOTICES DOES NOT EXEMPT THE
BORRDWER FROM QVERDUE FEES.