These Green Shoots Will Need A Lot of Watering: Economic Research
These Green Shoots Will Need A Lot of Watering: Economic Research
These Green Shoots Will Need A Lot of Watering: Economic Research
Table Of Contents
2013 Closes On Mixed Signals The Risk Of Deflation Weak Money Supply Growth Points To A Sluggish Recovery The ECB May Need To Take Extra Measures To Boost A Recovery
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Economic Research:
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
diverging trends: French GDP contracted, albeit modestly to 0.1%, while Germany's rose to 0.3%. The decoupling of the German economy is likely to be even more visible in the fourth quarter. The very strong read from the November IFO business climate survey, at its highest point since April 2012, and the equally encouraging results from the Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) survey, suggest that Germany's GDP could grow by 0.5% in the final quarter of this year. Overall, the green shoots that emerged in the second quarter in the eurozone have a long way to go before they bloom. As the year draws to a close there is a broad consensus that while the recession is over, the recovery will be very slow and uneven across countries (see table 1).
Table 1
Standard & Poor's Consensus European Central Bank Standard & Poor's Consensus European Central Bank Eurozone Germany France Italy Spain CPI Inflation (%) --2013---2014-(0.6) 0.5 0.2 (1.8) (1.2) (0.4) 0.5 0.1 (1.8) (1.3) (0.4) ----0.9 1.8 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.7 0.8 0.5 0.5 1.1 -----
Standard & Poor's Consensus European Central Bank Standard & Poor's Consensus European Central Bank Eurozone Germany France Italy Spain 1.5 1.6 1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1 1.3 1.5 1.4 ----1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 0.8 1.3 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.1 -----
Note: S&P and ECB forecasts are as of December 2013, Consensus forecasts are as of November 2013.
The European Commission estimates that the reduction in fiscal pressure is underpinning the revival in economic growth. Its calculations suggest that fiscal drag is coming down from 1.5% of eurozone GDP in 2012 to 0.75% in 2013 and to 0.2% of eurozone GDP in 2014, thanks to a relaxation in the fiscal targets in deficit countries. But it remains to be seen whether this will be sufficient to trigger a revival in the private sector. We believe that the eurozone's wall of private-sector debt will continue to be an impediment. A key difference between the U.S. economy, where a broad-based recovery is now visible, and the eurozone is what's been achieved so far in terms of debt reduction. The U.S. private sector's debt, expressed as a percentage of GDP, has come down more rapidly than the eurozone's (see chart 1).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 1
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 2
What's surprising is that inflation is decelerating only now, when the eurozone is just exiting its second and longest recession in five years. We noted exactly a year ago that "wage flexibility accompanied by price rigidities are resulting in depressed real incomes and in turn weaker domestic demand" (see "The Eurozone Enters An Uncertain 2013 As The New Recession Drags On," published on Dec. 13, 2012, on RatingsDirect). Lower unit labor costs have been particularly slow to pass through to domestic prices. We believe there may be three reasons for this: corporate margins, indirect taxation, and stickiness in the service sector. Companies have in some cases used the opportunity created by falling labor costs to improve their margins. Meanwhile, indirect taxes have increased in most countries since 2009. Spain is a case in point: while its unit labor costs have dropped by 10% since the second quarter of 2009, core consumer prices have increased by 3.2%. But the Spanish value-added rate rose 5 percentage points over the same period. Third, the breakdown of the eurozone's headline inflation index reveals that transportation, education, and household services have been the fastest-rising components. In other words, those sectors that are least exposed to international competitiveness have posted the largest gains. In that sense, this year's deceleration in price inflation appears to be a lagged reflection of weak economic conditions. Also contributing are lower energy and food prices, combined with a stronger euro exchange rate. Brent oil prices, for instance, fell by 8% between August and November of this year, while the euro exchange rate against the U.S. dollar
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
appreciated by 3% over the same period. There is a risk that the lagged price adjustment could lead to an "undershooting," with prices actually falling in the weakest economies of the eurozone (as is already the case in Greece). This concern is adding pressure on the ECB to "do more," meaning to introduce new sets of nonconventional measures to boost the eurozone economy in the coming year and bring headline inflation closer to its 2% official target.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 3
These trends reflect poor transmission of monetary policy to the real economy. They also reflect a contraction in the monetary base. In contrast with the U.S., where the Federal Reserve's balance sheet has steadily continued to increase throughout this year, the ECB's balance sheet has been shrinking since January. This is because eurozone core countries have been making early repayments of their loans under the ECB's long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) that have not been offset by additional liquidity injections by the central bank. The central bank's view, reiterated by ECB president Mario Draghi at the ECB's latest press conference on Dec. 5, is that "weak loan dynamics for nonfinancial corporations continue to reflect their lagged relationship with the business cycle, credit risk, and the ongoing adjustment of financial and nonfinancial sector balance sheets." The ECB president went on to say that "in order to ensure an adequate transmission of monetary policy to the financing conditions in euro area countries, it is essential that the fragmentation of euro area credit markets decline further and that the resilience of banks is strengthened where needed." This is where the asset quality review (AQR) comes into play, an assessment of the major banks' capital strength that the ECB is about to undertake--the results of which should be known by October of next year--before it adopts its supervisory role under the single supervisory mechanism in the final part of next year. The AQR is a major step forward in attempting to restore confidence in interbank markets and a key milestone in the creation of a genuine
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
banking union. (See "S&P Expects That The ECB's Review Of Eurozone Banks Will Have A Limited Impact On Ratings," published on Dec. 10, 2013.)
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Table 2
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Copyright 2013 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT