Arthur Williams - The Performance of Centrifugal Pumps As Turbines and Influence of Pump Geometry

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

The Performance of Centrifugal

Pumps as Turbines
and Influence of Pump Geometry
Arthur Williams University of Nottingham (School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering)
Arnaldo Rodrigues Flowserve Pumps, Newark, UK

Pump as Turbine (PaT) range

For Medium head Micro hydro, use either: Crossflow or

Pump as Turbine
Photo: Energy for Sustainable Development

For Pico size (< 5 kW) e.g. 22 m head, 22 l/s :

Photo: Border Green Energy Thailand

a pump is much more compact than a crossflow turbine, which needs either belt-drive or 8-pole generator

Typical pump and PaT curves


18 16 14 12 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 4 2 0 0 10 20 30 Flow (litre/s) 40 50 60 1000 0

PaT Head Pump best efficiency: 72%

10 8 6

PaT Power

End-suction centrifugal pump with 4-pole motor

Turbine power (W)

Head (m)

Typical pump and PaT curves


16 14 12 10 80 70 60 50

Head (m)

8 6 4 2 0 0 10 20 30 Flow (l/s) 40

PaT best efficiency: 72% Pump best efficiency: 72%

40 30 20 10 0

50

60

Efficiency (%)

PaT efficiencies can be as good as pump mode but not always


1.15 1.1 1.05
PAT:Pump efficiency ratio

1 0.95 0.9 0.85

+/- 5%
>2% lower efficiency +/- 2% efficiency >2% higher efficiency Double suction pumps

0.8 0.75 10 100

Cylindrical volute pump

1000

Pump Specific Speed (Nq - metric units - logarithmic scale)

Examples of PaT applications


Rural Electrification:

Kinko, Tanzania (10 kW) ->

Sahyadri Energy Systems

Photos: Pico Energy Ltd.

^ Thima, Kenya (2.2 kW) ->

Examples of PAT applications

Water In
To drinking water tank

PAT

Gearbox

Multi-stage Pump

^ PATs for water pumping:


Cave system in Java, Indonesia (45 kW each set)
Diagram adapted from KSB Pumps

Zones for PAT loss study (CFD)

Plane vi-vii

Plane v-vi

Zone vi

Measurement plane for suction head


Zone vii

Pump Centreline
Zone vi Zone v Zone iv

Impeller

Draft Tube

Zone iii
Zone ii Zone i

Churning region Volute

CFD was checked against tests


No leakage Simplification of pump geometry changes CFD predictions

Full model

No churning volume

V-shaped interface
- OK for pump mode - not acceptable for turbine modelling

PAT with constricted impeller eye

CFD streamlines: Turbine mode

Modification to impeller = material removed

Enlarging suction eye reduces head

24 20
hhyd curves

80 70
Overload region begins
gH/N D
2 2

60 50 40 30 20 10 0

gH/N2D2

16 12
No load line

8 4 0 0.04

0.08
Non-Modified

End of part load region

0.12
Modified-Eye

Q/ND3

Efficiency (%)

Enlarging suction eye reduces head, but not power

2.0 1.6
hhyd curves Phyd/N D
3 5

80 70

1.2 0.8
End of part Overload region

50 40 30 20 10 0

0.4 0.0 0.04

No load line

0.08
Non-Modified

0.12
Modified-Eye

Q/ND3

Efficiency (%)

60

Phyd/N3D5

Loss (m)
0 8
No load

12 16 20
End of part load

Discharge (l/s)
24 28 32

BEP Overload region

PaT selection

Double suction pump with ribs to prevent pre-swirl

End suction pump with Cylindrical Volute

Examples of pumps NOT suitable for turbine application

Estimating PaT match for Thima site

25

80 70

20 60 15 50
Efficiency (%)

Head (m)

Predicted operating point


Pump head Net site head Estimated Turbine Pump eff (%)

40 30 20 10 0

10

0 0 5 10 15 20 Flow (l/s) 25 30 35 40 45

Correcting PaT match at Thima


40 35 30 25 80

Cut down impeller

70 60

Head (m)

Full size impeller

50 40 30 20 10 0

20 15 10 5 0 15 20 25 Flow (l/s) 30 35

A reduction in impeller diameter improved PaT efficiency at this site

Efficiency (%)

Conclusions
Pumps as Turbines (PaTs): Are suitable for medium-head micro & pico hydro Have acceptable efficiency for fixed flow operation May need modification to improve efficiency

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD): Gives useful insight into hydraulic losses Needs to use appropriate geometrical models

Indicates some pump geometries not suitable for micro-hydro

Acknowledgements
where most of the research was done where much of testing was done (Prof Franz Nestmann & Dr Punit Singh)

funded most of Arnaldos PhD

funded research exchange with Karlsruhe


funded my travel to Hidroenergia 2008

You might also like