Using Games in Teacher Training - Sarah Walker
Using Games in Teacher Training - Sarah Walker
Using Games in Teacher Training - Sarah Walker
uk
Materials: One large blank sheet of paper or cardboard and one dice per group of 3-4 trainees. A ruler is also useful. Procedure:
1. Arrange trainees/teachers in groups of 3 or 4. 2. Give each group a large sheet of paper, and ask them to divide in into 32 or 64 squares depending on the size of the sheet of paper. (32 or 64 squares can be produced by folding the paper). Each square should then be numbered, as in a snakes and ladders game (i.e.: begin in the bottom left hand corner. Number the first line of squares from left to right, the second line from right to left, and so on.) 3. Tell each group to arrange about 10 snakes and about 10 ladders anywhere on their board. They should then write a negative career event (e.g. Burnout: you are unable to face your beginners class) at the head of each snake, and a positive one (e.g. Your article is accepted for publication by a teaching journal) at the foot of each ladder. 4. When boards are complete, invite the groups either to play their own game (by throwing the dice and moving a marker the appropriate number of squares), or to change boards with another group and play the game prepared by their colleagues. 5. After one round of the game, compare the boards and discuss the different perceptions of success and failure in an ELT career that they contain. Comment: I have a feeling that part of the fun of this activity comes from the product, and that sessions where trainees, teachers, or students, actually work on an end product are usually very stimulating. Acknowledgement: The idea of using Snakes and Ladders for student activities comes from Grammar Games by Mario Rinvolucri (published by Cambridge University Press). This is an adaptation of much the same idea to Teacher Training/Development Game 2: Terminology Call my Bluff Objective: To take a light-hearted look at some of the terminology trainees may come across and have to deal with in their reading. Materials: List of words to be defined. Copy of The Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics or other source of ELT terminology definitions. Method: 1. Trainer arranges class in groups of 3 or 4. 2. Each group is given about 4 key words (or phrases or acronyms) to define. (Alternatively, trainees can select their own words.) 3. For each word, 3 definitions are prepared (one true definition and two false ones). 4. After a reasonable period (10-15 minutes) for preparation, two teams are formed. Each team should contain the same number of groups. 5. Each team presents one word at a time, reading out the 3 definitions. The other team must try to identify the correct definition.
Example: INTERLANGUAGE (possible definitions) a) a language used as a means of international communication (False) b) the type of language patterns that occur in interviews (False) c) the type of language produced by students who are in the process of learning a language (True) List of 20 possible terms for definition: phoneme contrastive analysis overgeneralization salience illocutionary force proxemics CALL dyad RP chain drill construct validity homophone IPA TPR monitoring code switching fricative SLA
Acknowledgement: The idea of using EFL/Linguistics terminology for Call My Bluff comes from my colleague, David Coles, who also suggests Terminology Charades (in which each syllable of a term would be acted out and then the whole word.)
References: (1) Woodward, Tessa: Process Options 2: Loop Input in The Teacher Trainer, No. 0 Autumn 1986 (2) Edge, Julian: Communication during a session on Cooperative Development at the University of Brasilia, November 1989 (unpublished so far) (3) Maley, Alan: Exquisite Corpses, Men of Glass and Oullpo: harnessing the irrational to language learning in Humanistic Approaches: and Empirical View ELT Documents 113, the British Council, 1982