Team Evaluation
Team Evaluation
Team Evaluation
a numeric rating and anecdotal comments to support the rating. For completion of the numerical assessment, type in the names of your team members in the yellow columns to the right of the scoring rubric.
Element 4 3 -2 1-0 Nick S. *Numerical Rating Josh V. Darrin
Consistently communicated in ways sensitive to the feelings and knowledge base of the group
Inconsistently Rarely, if ever, communicated ideas and communicated ideas and opinions in ways sensitive opinions in ways sensitive to to the feelings and the feelings and knowledge knowledge base of the base of the group group
Darrin did great with understanding the process of the grant project. I gave him a 4 on ideas because when we explained a certain task for him, he contributed 100% and threw ideas out for us to use. I also gave him a 4 on his role of the group because he researched for products that were possible for us to use and we ended up using the product he found. I gave him a 3 on the other parts due to being late during meetings and not fully understanding the process.
Nick was very beneficial for our group and was willing to work on the project at any time. We worked well together when typing up the final presentation by correcting each other when we felt was needed.
Josh contributed many parts to this project. For example, he was the only one from Wisconsin so we decided to use his school. He did a great job making the survey, bringing ideas to the table, and providing knowledge about the school district we chose.