Impact of Negative Emotions On Leader's Performance: (An Empirical Study of Banking Sector of Pakistan)
Impact of Negative Emotions On Leader's Performance: (An Empirical Study of Banking Sector of Pakistan)
Impact of Negative Emotions On Leader's Performance: (An Empirical Study of Banking Sector of Pakistan)
13
Abstract
Organizations involve emotions and passions. The management of emotions is complex and unstable. Some emotions maybe controlled and some may be redirected, yet many have roots in unconscious origins. Exhibit of Negative emotions had a significant and negative affect on follower assessment of leader effectiveness as compared to neutral emotional display. This study focused on three main negative emotions like depression, anxiety and irritation that directly affect the leaders performance. This study uses questionnaire
approach in order to examine the extent to which these negative emotions affect the leaders performance. Results indicated that anxiety, irritation and depression have significant impact on leaders performance. There is an instruction for managers to create and keep a positive emotional climate in their workplaces rather than negative emotions. Keywords: Negative emotions, Leader performance, Banking sector
I. In todays dynamic world, leaders play an important role in every organization. As the competition between the service oriented organizations is very high, and there is the need of continuous change and development of these organizations especially for commercial banks where the only possibility to survive profitably and successfully is due to the effective and productive leadership. Leadership is process of social interaction where leaders attempt to influence the behavior of their followers (Yukl, 2002). Leadership originally was thought to be inherent in an individual. It was argued that leader was born not made (Bass, 1999). Leadership has been a hot topic of research for over 50 years. More than 15,000 articles and books have been published. Approximately organizations spend fifty billion dollars per year on leaders development (Fulmer and Conger, 2004). Regardless of this knowledge and investment many organizations feel that they have deficiency of effective leaders. Approximately fifty to seventy five percent leaders do not perform well (Hogan and Hogan, 2007), the reason behind this is a leaders negative emotions such as depression, anxiety and irritation; they usually show on the work place. For decades, relationship of leadership and emotions has been the topic of debate. Frijda (1988) defines emotions as an action state produce by a mismatch between an organisms goal and some internal or environmental stimulus. Interest in emotions in the work place has
Introduction accelerated rapidly over decades. The study of emotions in the work settings has a long history. The starting point for modern research on emotion in organization seems to have been sociologist (Hochschild, 1983) seminal book on emotional labour: The Managed Heart. Emotions are known as an inescapable characteristic of organizational life. Emotions are learned aspects of behavior and are situation specific and they arte generally not irrational but quiet practical. Negative emotions shown had a substantial and negative effect on overall organization (Kristi M. Lewis).This research also to find out the impact of irritation on leader effectiveness. Negative emotions could also affect followers perception of leaders effectiveness and credibility (Congers and Kanungo, 1994). The objective of the study is to find out the impact of depression, anxiety and irritation on leaders performance. In this study focus is at how to deal with negative emotions of leaders in order to make them more effective and productive. The aim of this research was to find out the impact of depression on leader effectiveness. This research also aims to find out the impact of anxiety on leader performance of banking sector Pakistan. Research is going to conduct in Islamabad/Rawalpindi; different bank managers are surveyed through questionnaire to clearly examine the extent to which their negative emotions affect their performance. In this ever changing world of today it is difficult for the organization
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
2.
Literature review insensitivity etc. (Twenge and Campbell,2008) examined that the number of people being treated for depression is more than tripled in the ten years period from 1987 to 1997,jumping from 1.8 million to 6.3 million. The available evidence suggests that anxiety and depression are now common even apart from more diagnoses and treatment. (Pablo Zognbi Manrique De Lara, 2006) analyzed that the general prediction in the organization and social psychological literature is the unfavorable perceptions of interactional justice that can generate the negative emotions such as anger, fear, resentments etc. He argued that fear is one of the basic negative emotion. (Sandi.Mann,2006) identifies that particular type of emotional displays are often most essential for the teams and services work but there are some emotions that lead towards the potentially stressful work. He also examined that these emotions must be handled properly. (Alan D.Boss, 2008) analyzed that how emotional regulation and self leadership can help to move the experience of personal failure towards recovery. He also suggests that emotional regulation and self leadership can work together to help those who have experienced failure and move towards recovery so fast and smoothly
Leaders emotion in work place setting is hot topic in management today. Emotions are more important in work place than just emotional intelligence. The study of emotions in organizations settings has provided novel and important understanding of how people behave in the organization. And there is an instruction for managers to create and keep a positive emotional climate in their workplaces rather than negative emotions. Emotions in the work place settings have a long history and they are the inevitable features of organizational life. They are instrumental in defining relations of deference, position, status and authority. For decades, relationship of leadership and emotions has been the topic of debate, but in last ten years the relationship becomes clearer. Demonstration of leaders negative emotions had a substantial and severe effect on organization. As depression, anxiety, strain, irritation and fear have negative impact on leaders performance, covering both personal and professional aspect, the argument is supported by literature review.(Ronald J. Bruke,2006) identified the everyday causes of failure and possible corrective actions. He also analyzed that leaders that failed to behave in a ways representative of their personality it limits their career. These flaws include arrogance,
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
28
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
2/
III. Primary data is obtained from the managers of banks operating in Rawalpindi/Islamabad through self administered survey questionnaires. Target population included branch managers as well as operational managers, non probability sampling is used, and sample includes all levels / categories of 100 managers by using convenience sampling method. It is quantitative study, data is collected from leaders and managers working in their normal routine, no changes are made in their work setting. The 5 point likert scale is used to measure level of impact; 1) strongly disagree 2) disagree 3) IV. Table 1
Methodology neither agree/nor disagree 4) agree 5) strongly agree, for the collection of data: The questionnaire comprises of two parts; part 1 comprising items seeking negative emotions such as anger, anxiety, depression, irritation. Part 2 consists of items, which sought to collect information about the independent variables leaders performance which include leaders effectiveness. The subjects will be given the questionnaire in their place of work. Instructions on how to fill the questionnaire are given. Confidential treatment of information will be assured. RESULTS:
MEAN Leader performance Anxiety Depression Irritation 3.6986 2.9300 3.1550 2.8133
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
3!
This table shows mean scores and standard deviation of leadership performance, depression, anxiety and Irritation. The mean score for leadership performance is 3.6986 which shows that respondents are little agree to the leadership performance items in banking sector. The mean score for anxiety is 2.9300, which shows that respondents are neutral with the leadership performance. The mean score for depression is 3.1550, which shows that respondents are Table 2 Leader
slightly are neutral with statement of leader performance. The mean score for Irritation is 2.8133, which shows that respondents are slightly are neutral with statement of leader performance. Standard deviation shows the deviation from the mean of each dimension (leadership performance, Anxiety, depression, Irritation) values are 1.02934, 76383, 99480 and 79182 respectively.
Anxiety
depression
performance Anxiety depression irritation Pearson Correlation Pearson Correlation Pearson Correlation -.728 -.754 -.473
** ** **
-.713 -.574
** **
-.719
**
Pearson Correlation results are shown in Table 2. Correlation shows the relationship among the variables. The results indicate that anxiety has a significant and negative relationship with leader performance(r= -.728, p=000). The results of anxiety has a negative and significant relationship with depression(r=-.713, p=000). The results of anxiety has a negative and significant relationship with Irritation (r=-.574, p=000), this particular finding proved hypothesis H1 anxiety have significant impact on leader
performance. The results of depression has a negative and significant relationship with leader performance(r=-.754, p=000), this particular finding proved hypothesis H2 depression have significant impact on leader performance. The results of Irritation has a negative and significant relationship with leader performance(r=-.473, p=000), this particular finding proved hypothesis H3 irritation has significant impact on leaders performance.
TABLE 3
R R SQUARE ADJUSTED R SQUARE STD. ERROR OF THE ESTIMATE .813
a
.661
.650
.60880
TABLE 4
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
31
Regression analysis
According to regression model, all variables are significance. Coefficient, anxiety which means, decrease in 1 unit of anxiety, leader performance will increase by 0.555 units. Coefficients of depression are negative and depression beta value is 0.623. It means, if there is decrease in 1 unit of depression will increase 0.623 units in leader performance in banking sector. Coefficients of irritation is negative , It means, if there is decrease in 1 unit of irritation will increase 0.255 unit in leader performance in
banking sector. This table explains the percentage of variations in leader performance is explained by the variables entered in regression equation (R-Squared=66.1%, Adjusted Rsquare= 65.0%). Hence 66.1% variation in the leader performance is explained by the anxiety, depression and irritation. F-value is statistically significant at 0.000. It shows the fitness of the model. According to these findings we are able to accept H1, H2 and H3.
V. Our data suggest that negative emotions have a significant impact on the leadership performance of the banking sector. There are three elements which measure the negative emotions of banking sector top management like anxiety, depression and Irritation. It provides a realistic help to the argument that anxiety decreases the performance of top management of the banking sector. The finding shows that tendency of mangers have the same opinion that anxiety decreases their performance. The relationship between anxiety and leadership performance keep the management of banking sector in social frame of mind. Depression has significant and negative VI. All of us experience failure many times in our lives. Some fail miserably and get over it quickly, while others let it completely take over their lives. However, failure is not a
Discussion: relation with top management of banking sector it provides a realistic help to hypotheses that relationship between depression and leader performance effects effectiveness in performance of top management in banking sector. Results indicates that Irritation decreases the performance of the top management of banking sector because when he fell angry he take wrong decisions and failed to motivate the subordinates which leads to decreases the performance and also effects the leader productivity. When leader fell annoyed it impact on his communications skills due to which coordination is difficult and negative effect the leader performance. Conclusion Permanent state, and there are actions that can facilitate recovery. Most of the organizations in todays world have shortage of effective and efficient leaders in order to
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
32
References: .Mann, S. (2007). Expectations of emotional display in the workplace An American/British comparative study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 552-570. American/British comparative study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 552-570 Boss, D, A. and Jr, S, P, H.. (2008). Everyone fails! Using emotion regulation and self-leadership for recovery. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 135-150. Bruke, J. Ronald. (2006). Why leaders fail: exploring the dark side. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 27 No. 1, 2006 pp. 91-100 Chapman, J. (2006). Anxiety and defective decision making: an elaboration of the groupthink model. Management Decision, Vol. 44 No. 10, pp. 1391-1404. Dasborough, T, M. and Ashkanasy, M, N. (2002). Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader member relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 615634. Daus, S. and Ashkanasy,N, M. (2002). Emotion in the Workplace: The New Challenge for Managers. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), Vol. 16, No. 1, Theme: Focusingon Positive and Avoiding the Negative (Feb., 2002), pp. 76-86 DYNE, V, L. JEHN, A, K. and CUMMINGS, A. (2002). Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 5774. Fisher, C, D. and Ashkanasy, N, M. (2000). The emerging role of emotions in work life: an introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21 (2), 123-129. Gabrial, Y. and Griffiths, D, S. (2002). Emotion, Learning and Organizing. The Learning Organization, Vol. 9 (2), 214-221. Harvey, P. Martinko, J, M. and Douglas, C, S. (2006). Causal reasoning in dysfunctional leader-member interactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 8, pp. 747-762. Heyi, S. Na, M. and Dan, G. (2007). The Study on Relationship between the Traits of Leaders and the Performance of the Leaders under Different Organizational Cultures. Canadian Social Science, Vol.3, No.1, 39-46. Hunter, T, S. Tate, WW, B. Dzieweczynski, L, J. and Avers, K, E, B. (2011). Leaders make mistakes: A multilevel consideration of why. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 1016. Kent, W, T. (2006). Leadership and emotions in health care organizations. Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 49-66. Lara, P, Z, M. (2006). RESEARCH NOTE Fear in organizations does intimidation by formal punishment mediate the relationship between interactional justice and workplace internet deviance? Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 580-592.
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
33
IJTEMT; IN"E#IN$: %lri&', "( J, $oogle S&'ol)r, J-$)te, S&ri*+., ."o&sto& ),+ Sli+es')re ;Vol. II, Issue IV, ug 2!13
-)ge
30