Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Turkey: A Review of 5,000 Cases
Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Turkey: A Review of 5,000 Cases
Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Turkey: A Review of 5,000 Cases
Leber Magen Darm 1980;10:293-301. 3. Dunham F, Bourgeois N, Gelin M, Jeanmart J, Toussaint J, Cremer M. Retroperitoneal perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy; clinical course and management. Endoscopy 1982;14:92-6.
denal to gastric ulcers (7/1) was less than in Sudan (31/1)3 but higher than in the United States (3/1): Diagnostic accuracy of radiology was 68% compared to endoscopy, whereas the accuracy of endoscopy was 93% compared to surgery. Comparison of endoscopy with surgery at Mayo Clinic demonstrated that endoscopy missed fewer lesions.s Most of the missed lesions were found high in the gastric fundus, between large gastric folds or in a scarred duodenum. In our study, the majority of diagnostic errors by x-ray examination occurred primarily with gastritis. Upper endoscopic examination in 152 (53%) postsurgical patients found definite abnormalities as indicated in Table 1. In comparing x-ray and endoscopic examination, 77 patients (27%) were accurately diagnosed by both procedures. Endoscopic examination was established to be most helpful in diagnosing postsurgical patients since radiology showed the correct diagnosis in only 27% of the patients and these were predominantly marginal ulcers. Hirschowitz and Luketic6 found radiologic results to be positive in only 36% of 111 patients with marginal ulcers. The result of our study clearly indicates that an adequate evaluation of the postoperative stomach cannot be considered complete until fiberoptic examination has been carried out. Endoscopy was successfully performed on 184 patients with acute UGIB, 220 lesions being identified in 171 patients, with a diagnostic accuracy of 93% proven by surgery. In 13 patients no bleeding site was found. The duodenum was the most common site of bleeding, with duodenal ulceration in 68 (37%) patients. Fifty-one patients had erosive gastritis, the stomach being the second most common bleeding site. Esophageal varices accounted for 29 (16%), gastric ulcers for 9 (5%), and gastric carcinoma for 8 (4%). Two gastric hemangiomas and 2 gastric polyps presented in this series. The ratio of duodenal to gastric ulcers was 7.6/1, which was higher than the 0.87/1 1 and 6.22/1 7 found in reports from Great Britain. Serious endoscopic complications occurred in 6 patients: 2 cases of pseudo-acute abdomen, 1 of deep hematoma of the neck, and 1 of mandibular dislocation. One patient died of cardiac arrest during endoscopy; another patient with thrombocytopenia had a deep neck infection with hematoma as a major complication and died 6 days later. These complications represented 0.12% of 5,000 endoscopies. The experience with gastrointestinal endoscopy in Turkey is similar to that reported from Europe and the United States. However, the incidence of duodenal ulcer appears to be higher and that of esophageal varices lower, perhaps reflecting cultural influences.
Halis Simsek, MD Hasan Telatar, MD Sukran Karacadag, MD Burhan Kayhan, MD Figen Batman, MD Section of Gastroenterology
Hacettepe University Hospital Ankara, Turkey
Percent
35 15 2 1 1 1 45 100
REFERENCES
1. Cotton PB. Fiberoptic endoscopy and the barium meal. Results and implications. Br Med J 1973;2:161-5. 2. Hoare AM. Comparative study between endoscopy and radiology in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Br Med J 1975;1:27. 3. Fedail SS, Homeida MM, Aneba BM, Ghandour ZM. Upper
68
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
4. 5. 6. 7.
gastrointestinal fiberoptic endoscopy experience in the Sudan. Lancet 1985;15:2:897-9, McGuigan JE. Peptic ulcer in Harrison's principle of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987:1242. Cameron B, Ott BJ. The value of gastroscopy in clinical diagnosis: a computer-assisted study. Mayo Clin Proc 1977;52:8068. Hirschowitz BI, Luketic BC. Endoscopy in the postgastrectomy patient, an analysis of 580 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1971;18:27. Jonston SJ, Jones PF, Kyle J, Needham CD. Epidemiology and course of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in northeast Scotland. Br Med J 1973;3:655-60.
diceal orifice, and the junction of the teniae coli, which may produce a crow's foot appearance as they conjoin at the base of the cecum. 1- 5 Transillumination of light in the right lower quadrant is one of the traditional landmarks used for cecal identification. In many instances, light may be seen in the right lower quadrant, although the tip of the instrument is not actually in the cecum. 4 5 Reliance on transillumination can result in spurious endoscope tip localization since right lower quadrant light may be seen when the tip of the endoscope is in the sigmoid colon (pushed to the right) or in the midportion of the transverse colon, which has been pushed by the advancing endoscope toward the right. Although light in the right lower quadrant is not as useful nor as reliable a parameter of total colonoscopic intubation as the confirmatory endoscopic landmarks, this study was performed to ascertain the frequency with which transillumination can be seen in the right lower quadrant utilizing conventional fiberoptic and the newer video instruments. The light can be seen in 90% of cases when total colonoscopic intubation has been achieved using fiberendoscopes. In 10% of cases, either due to anatomic position, obesity, or other factors, light cannot be transilluminated in the right lower quadrant when the instrument tip is in the right lower quadrant (in the cecal pole or just above the ileocecal valve). In comparison, the video endoscope with its less brilliant illumination results in transillumination through the abdominal wall in only 54% of patients when the tip of the endoscope is in the cecum.
Jerome D. Waye, MD Mary Ann E. Atchison, RN, GIA Maria C. Talbott, GIA Blair S. Lewis, MD
New York, New York
REFERENCES
1. Sugawa C, Schuman B. Primer of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co, 1981:116-7. 2. Cotton P, Williams C. Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1980:118-9. 3. Shinya H. Colonoscopy: diagnosis and treatment of colonic diseases. New York: Igaku-Shoin, 1982:67-8. 4. Waye J. Colonoscopy intubation techniques without fluoroscopy. In: Hunt R, Waye J, eds. Colonoscopy. London: Chapman and Hall, 1981:174-6. 5. Whalen J, Riemenschneider P. An analysis of the normal anatomic relationships of the colon as applied to roentgenographic observations. Am J Roentgenol Radiat Ther Nucl Med 1967;99:55-61.