Operations Strategy: Session 4
Operations Strategy: Session 4
Operations Strategy: Session 4
Session 4
Dr. Partha P. Datta Operations Management Group E-mail: [email protected]
Capacity Strategy involves long term plan for developing resources and involves decisions on sizing, timing, type and location of real assets or resources Capacity is the maximal sustainable output rate of a resource Capacity comes in many forms (Burger King, Google, Amazon, Flextronics) Utilization is the rate at which we choose to operate a resource at any given time
3
Capacity Investments
Capacity is seldom FREE! One time investment cost Operating cost Additional costs Investment decisions:
Partially or completely irreversible Uncertainty over future rewards (Virgins $5.5bn order of 13 Airbus planes in 2004 was nothing but a pure GAMBLE)
Timing
Cost of adjustment and expected cost of excess/shortage capacity
Types/Locations
Different capacity and total output
A soft malleable constraint Black Art Capacity frictions: leadtimes, lumpiness & fixed costs Large and irreversible investments Capacity decisions can be political Measuring and valuing capacity shortages is not obvious
6
Decisions to make: Time = when? (lead or lag) Size = by how much? (many small, one big)
Demand
time
Advantages of Leading
Advantages of Lagging
Volume (units/wk)
Capacity Timing Strategies Hybrid timing strategy between lead and lag: Inventory-smoothing Smoothing
capacity strategy Demand
fills
Inventory buildup
capacity shortage
time
Economies of Scale (EoS) in Capacity Investment Two Capacity Investment Cost Models
1. 2. Linear CapEx function: C(K) = c0 + cKK Power CapEx function: C(K) = c0 + (cK/a)Ka with 0 < a < 1
Linear CapEx
a=1
a = .6 decreasing a
slope = cK
Power CapEx
fixed cost c0
$0 0
Capacity Size K
10
11
Demand Scenario 3
Demand Scenario 4
Existing capacity
Year 0
Time
12
Demand from these emerging markets is highly uncertain; marketing and sales reports predict that Acer's low-price PC will either be a blockbuster, a success, or a dud. Assume that the demand forecast for those three scenarios is, respectively: 200 thousand units per year with likelihood of 25%, 100 thousand units per year with 50% likelihood, or 30 thousand units per year with 25% likelihood. The cost structure is assumed to be as follows. Capacity expansion incurs a fixed cost of $8 million plus a marginal cost of $50 per unit of capacity; i.e., adding production capacity of 100,000 units per year costs $13 million. The process and product technology is commercially viable for four years (at that point a new technology would be needed, an issue we will ignore for now). Acer expects each PC to contribute about $80 in operating profits. A 25% discount rate is used for these types of investment projects.
13