MIT PHD Project
MIT PHD Project
MIT PHD Project
Motivation
Candidates idea about the topic is not clear Supervisors coaching is not sufficient The result is:
PhD taking longer than required Less results than expected
Motivation
Overview
Project Management
Introduction Scope / Time / Quality
Project PhD
Project Manager PhD Management Plan
Communication
Project Management
General introduction
Unique Product/Service
definite and quantifiable result
Progressive
Developed in steps
Unique Product/Service
definite and quantifiable result
Progressive
Developed in steps
Examples
Manhattan Project (Good)
1942/1945 $2 000 000 000 120 000 people
10
Best Practices
Project Stakeholders
Someone whose interests may influence positively or negatively the project:
Sponsor Team Client Management Family
13
14
15
16
17
18
Lessons Learned
19
Scope Definition
Product Scope
Characteristics and functions
Project Scope
Work that has to be done to guarantee that the product has the defined characteristics and functions
20
Time Planning
Define work packages
Measurable in deliverables Connected to Milestones
Define activities/tasks
Units of work measurable in time/cost/resources Dont overestimate Realize that the probability of failing time estimate is 50% (classic definition)
Project Management for PhDs 21
Quality
degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfill requirements
Product Quality
Meet clients requirements
Project Quality
Including clients requests
Project PhD
Project Management approach
24
All of them will, at some point, influence both positively or negatively the PhD work !
Project Management for PhDs 25
Leadership can be exercised upwards If Supervisor doesnt manage, the candidate has to play the PhD managers role
7 Manage Project
8 Information Distribution
9 Scope Verification
10 Schedule Control
28
7 Manage Project
8 Information Distribution
9 Scope Verification
10 Schedule Control
29
7 Manage Project
9 Scope Verification
10 Schedule Control
30
7 Manage Project
8 Information Distribution
9 Scope Verification
10 Schedule Control
31
7 Manage Project
8 Information Distribution
9 Scope Verification
10 Schedule Control
32
7 Manage Project
8 Information Distribution
9 Scope Verification
10 Schedule Control
33
7 Manage Project
8 Information Distribution
9 Scope Verification
10 Schedule Control
34
5 6 8
35
Need/Justification
Research question to be answered motivation
Sponsor
University / Industry partner / Research project
Main Stakeholders
References the ones you would like to referee your work This should be fix throughout the project!
Project Management for PhDs 36
3 WBS definition
Deliverable oriented hierarchical decomposition of the work
Dissertation
Introduction
Modeling
Methodology I
Methodology II
Results
Conclusions
Problem Statement
Literature Review
5 Quality Planning
Degree to which the research activities fulfill the requirements:
Methodology that improves performance in 10% Definition of acceptance criteria Standards compliment Quality metrics Results have to pass statistical tests (t-test)
Important step for results evaluation!
Project Management for PhDs 40
6 Communication Planning
Determine the information and communication needs of the stakeholders
Different persons Different cultures Rule of thumb says 90% of projects problems are communication problems
41
Know
Create
Do
Feel
Mental Software
Portuguese Software:
Collectiveness Need for Control and Safety Cultivate distance to power Feminine (no conflict) Plenty of Time Poor selfesteem
American Software:
Individualists Power delegation, empowerment Proximity to Power Conflict is positive Planning driven Rewards Open to changes Status (economic) Less formalism
Leadership
Autocratic Crises Affiliative Change Participative Plan Formalist Control Mobilizer Execute Reference Feedback Trainer Initiating
Different types of leadership have to be used according to the situation!
7 Project Management
Update:
Scope Definition Schedule Update Quality Planning Update Communication Planning
Progress Reports
8 Information distribution
Weekly meetings with the supervisors Semester progress reports Local Seminars CAT presentation Conference papers Journal papers Dissertation
9 Scope Verification
Check if quality criteria required for the deliverables are met Obtaining the stakeholder formal acceptance of the completed scope and associated deliverables:
Chapter acceptance by supervisor and cosupervisors Journal paper submission /acceptance
Project Management for PhDs 48
10 Schedule Control
Determine current status of PhD
Weekly meetings using
performance reports and schedule baseline
11 Quality Control
Monitoring specific results to determine whether they comply with criteria defined in Quality Planning
Analyze progress reports, papers, chapters
50
12 Close PhD
Finalize the PhD
Compilation of final thesis Verification of final thesis Dissertation discussion Administrative procedures
51
Plan Example
A fictitious example
Summary
PhDs are projects that usually take longer than planned and present less results than expected. In this work I aim to develop a new management tool for PhDs based on Project Management techniques to improve scope, time and quality of PhDs.
State-of-the-art
Project Management is a body of knowledge that describes the skills, tools and techniques considered to be the best practice to manage the project activities in order to attain projects objectives [PMI]
References
[PMI] - www.pmi.org [LBS] - www.lse.ac.uk/collections/TLCPhD/projectManagement.htm
Performance report I [12 months] Develop new methodology document (thesis chapter) [21 months] Journal paper II [24 months]
Describe new methodology
Performance report II [24 months] Describe case study analysis document (thesis chapter) [27 months] Describe case study results document (thesis chapter) [33 months] Journal paper III [36 months]
Compare both methodologies
Dissertation (thesis compilation) [36 months] Performance report III [36 months]
Define metrics
Number of failed milestones Total weeks of delays [milestones] Number of issues pointed out by reviewers
Conclusions
Implement this plan formally