Site Suitability Report S03EG: Acton Park Industrial Estate
Site Suitability Report S03EG: Acton Park Industrial Estate
Please note: Further details are provided in the Final Report on Site Selection Process (doc ref: 7.05) that can be found on the Thames Tideway Tunnel section of the Planning Inspectorates web site.
Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 Purpose and structure of the report ......................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................. 1 Consultation............................................................................................. 2 Site and surroundings .............................................................................. 2 Type of site .............................................................................................. 3
3 4
Proposed use of site construction phase ................................................... 4 Proposed use of site operational phase ..................................................... 5 4.1 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 Restoration and after-use ........................................................................ 6 Access ..................................................................................................... 6 Construction works considerations .......................................................... 7 Permanent works considerations............................................................. 8 Health and safety..................................................................................... 8 Introduction .............................................................................................. 8 Planning applications and permissions.................................................... 8 Planning context ...................................................................................... 9 Planning comments ............................................................................... 11 Introduction ............................................................................................ 12 Transport ............................................................................................... 12 Archaeology........................................................................................... 12 Built heritage and townscape................................................................. 12 Water resources hydrogeology and surface water ............................. 13 Ecology .................................................................................................. 13 Flood risk ............................................................................................... 13 Air quality ............................................................................................... 13
Environmental appraisal ............................................................................... 12 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8
7.9 7.10 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7
Noise ..................................................................................................... 13 Land quality ........................................................................................... 14 Introduction ............................................................................................ 14 Socio-economic profile .......................................................................... 14 Issues and impacts ................................................................................ 14 Introduction ............................................................................................ 15 Crown land and special land comments ................................................ 15 Land to be acquired ............................................................................... 15 Property valuation comments ................................................................ 15 Disturbance compensation comments................................................... 16 Discretionary purchase costs comments ............................................... 16 Offsite statutory compensation comments ............................................. 16 Site acquisition cost assessment ........................................................... 16 Introduction ............................................................................................ 16 Engineering ........................................................................................... 16 Planning................................................................................................. 16 Environment .......................................................................................... 17 Socio-economic and community ............................................................ 17 Property ................................................................................................. 17 Next steps in the site selection process................................................. 18
Appendices ............................................................................................................. 19 Appendix 1 Sources of information Appendix 2 Site location plan Appendix 3 Planning and environment plans Appendix 4 Photographs of the site and surroundings Appendix 5 Transport plan Appendix 6 Services and geology plan Appendix 7 Construction phase layout Appendix 8 Operational phase layout Appendix 9 Environmental appraisal tables
ii
List of tables
Page number
Table 3.1 Construction phase data ............................................................................ 4 Table 4.1 Operational phase data ............................................................................. 5
List of abbreviations AOD BAP BT CPO CSO DLR EA GLA HGV LNR LPA LU m MOL ONS ORN PLA POS PTAL SAM SINC SNCI SSR SSSI SUDS TfL TD above Ordnance Datum biodiversity action plan British Telecom compulsory purchase order combined sewer overflow Docklands Light Railway Environment Agency Greater London Authority heavy goods vehicle local nature reserve local planning authority London Underground metre/metres Metropolitan Open Land Office of National Statistics Olympic Route Network Port of London Authority public open space public transport accessibility level scheduled ancient monument site of importance for nature conservation site(s) of nature conservation importance site suitability report site(s) of special scientific interest sustainable urban drainage systems Transport for London tunnel datum
iii
Transport for London Road Network Thames Policy Area unitary development plan unexploded ordnance
iv
1 1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.2
1.2.1
Background
The process for selecting sites is set out in the Site selection methodology paper. All sites have previously passed through the following parts of Stage 1: Part 1A Creation of the long list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites Part 1B Creation of a short list of potential main tunnel (and CSO) sites o o o Table 2.2: Long list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites an assessment against set considerations and values Table 2.3: Draft short list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites assessment against a list of more detailed considerations Workshops to consider each site to arrive at a short list of sites.
The amendments made in August 2011 do not change the site selection methodology process. The amendments only related to the introduction of a second phase of consultation (paragraphs 2.3.13-2.4.15) and minor factual updates.
Page 1
Site suitability report S03EG 1.2.2 The final part of Stage 1 includes this report. The following is an overall summary of all elements that apply to all the sites on the final short list: Part 1C Creation of the preferred list of main tunnel (and CSO) sites site data, site visits, site suitability reports, engineering options report and optioneering workshops that are reported in the Phase two scheme development report.
1.2.3
The Site selection methodology paper also contains a provision for a back-check process in paragraph 2.5.6 that states: If any sites for any of the main tunnel sites or intermediate sites (or CSO site) are eliminated for any reason, if there are significant changes of circumstances in relation to existing sites or combinations of sites, if new or replacement sites are required or found or if the engineering design develops in unexpected ways then a targeted repeat of stages 1-3 will need to be undertaken in order to fill in any site gaps.
1.3
1.3.1
Consultation
Thames Waters approach to engagement and consultation for the Thames Tunnel project is outlined in the Statement of Community Consultation and the accompanying Community Consultation Strategy. Thames Water has engaged regularly with all potentially affected London local authorities, other stakeholders and interested parties on sites and the project. Phase one consultation has been completed for all the preferred and shortlisted sites along with the three main tunnel route options. The analysis of the consultation responses is set out in the Report on phase one consultation and Interim engagement report. Any relevant site comments were considered at the post phase one consultation optioneering workshops. The outcomes of these workshops are reported in the Phase two scheme development report. After the workshops, engagement on sites has continued with key stakeholders, and the engineering design for sites has also continued in parallel. In autumn 2011, phase two consultation will provide another opportunity for people to comment on sites.
1.3.2
2 2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
Page 2
Site suitability report S03EG 2.1.4 The surrounding area is predominantly industrial in character, with industrial units to the east, southeast and southwest of the site. The southern site boundary backs onto residential garden space from properties along Hatfield Road. Part of the site is close to Southfield Playing Fields to the southwest and is in proximity to Acton Park to the north, beyond The Vale. The site is located within a major employment location (London Borough of Ealing, UPD Policy 6.1), and all the mapped designations are shown on the planning and environment plans in Appendix 3. Photographs of the site and surroundings, together with an aerial photograph of the site, are attached as Appendix 4. A number of preliminary transport plans for the site are attached as Appendix 5. Third-party assets and significant utilities are listed below and are shown on the services and geology plan in Appendix 6: Acton Park Industrial Estate (main tunnel reception site) 1.8m diameter sewer adjacent to the site in Stanley Gardens 1.8m by 1.1m culvert sewer within the site adjacent to the south-western boundary 1.2m diameter sewer within the site adjacent to the south-western boundary.
2.1.5
Acton Storm Tanks (CSO) 2.1.9 Thames Water operational site occupied by six uncovered storm tanks, a pumping station and associated infrastructure 1.8m diameter Acton Storm Relief sewer (CSO connection is to this sewer) A number of additional sewers are located within the Storm Tanks site.
A number of additional sewers are located within the Storm Tanks site. The locations of other third-party assets, such as BT and fibre optic communication cables, are to be confirmed by further studies and utility searches and may not be shown on the services and geology plan. Information on the geology specific to this site is unavailable. It is considered that geological conditions on this site will be similar to those found at the Acton Storm Tanks, which lie to the southwest. Information on the geology specific to the Acton Storm Tanks can be found within the services and geology plan, which is in Appendix 6. This plan shows that both shafts would be founded in London Clay.
2.1.10
2.2
2.2.1
Type of site
The site S03EG is being considered as a main tunnel reception site with a CSO interception of the Acton Storm Relief Sewer (CS01X).
Page 3
Site suitability report S03EG 2.2.2 The location of the Acton Storm Relief Sewer would be remote from site S03EG. The development of site S03EG as a main tunnel reception site would still require a separate CSO site at C01YC Acton Storm Tanks and a probable tunnelled connection culvert between C01YC and S03EG.
3
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
This drawing provides an initial preliminary schematic layout that has not been optimised. If the site proceeds to the next stage as a preferred site, construction phase layouts would be optimised to minimise impacts. Drawings identifying typical construction activities associated with the shaft construction phase are provided in Appendix 7. Potential above-ground construction features (dependent on shaft type) include: approximately 3m high hoarding around the site boundary welfare facilities, temporary structures, approximately 3m high. grout plant, approximately 3m to 5m high, including silos mobile crane, approximately 30m high (maximum and not for full construction duration).
3.1.4
3.1.5
Preliminary data associated with the construction phase are provided in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Construction phase data Activity Length of construction period Likely working hours, ie, (night/day/weekend) Working days Primary means of transporting excavated material away from site Primary means of transporting materials to site Main tunnel reception site with CSO interception 4 to 5 years 12 hrs from 7am to 7pm Mon to Sat Road Road
Page 4
4 4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4 4.1.5
4.1.6 4.1.7
Page 5
4.2
4.2.1
5 5.1
5.1.1
Road
5.1.2 Existing road access to the site is via two access points directly off Stanley Gardens. This is a 7.5m-wide, one-way road which allows northbound vehicle movements towards the A4020. Traffic accessing the site travels southbound along Warple Way prior to using either Canham Road or Bradford Road to access Stanley Gardens. Traffic exiting the site uses Stanley Gardens to return to the A4020. The roads are of restricted width and have high levels of on-street parking on both sides. They are fronted primarily by business and light industrial premises. A section of Warple Way and Stanley Gardens are currently one-way roads, with Warple Way allowing vehicles in a southbound direction (as far as the junction with Canham Road) and Stanley Gardens allowing traffic flow in a northbound direction. Alternative access from the A4020 is currently available via the residential and traffic calmed Larden Road and either Cobbold Road or Valetta Road. Construction site access and egress would be via two temporary accesses onto Stanley Gardens in the vicinity of the two existing accesses to the industrial area. The access and egress route from/to the TLRN (A40) would use Old Oak Road and The Vale (A4020). The access route would then use Warple Way, Bradford Road and Stanley Gardens to access the site. Warple Way between The Vale and Bradford Road is one-way southbound, is approximately 7.5 metres wide and features parking on both sides, reducing the effective width to 3.5m. To enable one-way access by HGVs, some on-street parking would require removal. A tight bend is situated at the junction of Warple Way and Bradford Road. Large HGVs such as articulated vehicles may be unable to manoeuvre around this bend. Therefore, some widening works may be required in the north-western corner of the Acton Storm Tanks site to enable large HGVs to egress the site. Both Canham Road and Stanley Gardens feature on-street parking. Canham Road features parking on one-side, while Stanley Gardens features parking on both sides. On both roads, this reduces the effective carriageway width to 3.5 metres. Some on-street parking would therefore require removal to enable one-way access by HGVs. Access route via Warple Way/Stanley Gardens is 1.8km.
5.1.3
5.1.4 5.1.5
5.1.6
Page 6
Site suitability report S03EG 5.1.7 Permanent access to the site would be off Stanley Gardens, utilising the existing one-way system. Access would be via the existing emergency access gate to the industrial estate. The use of site S03EG for a main tunnel site would still require the use of site C01YC for CSO interception works. It is anticipated that site S03EG would act as the main tunnel site, with C01YC being a smaller CSO site. Road access for the CSO site at C01YC would be via new vehicular access points off Warple Way, in close proximity to the junction with Cobbald Road. Vehicles accessing site C01YC would travel southbound along Warple Way before turning into the site. Vehicles exiting the C01YC site would travel northbound along Warple Way, prior to utilising the existing one-way system in Canham Road and Stanley Gardens to transfer to either site S03EG or the A4020. Further details about the site access requirements for the CSO interception works is contained within Site suitability report C01YC, Acton Storm Tanks.
5.1.8
5.1.9
5.1.10
Rail
5.1.11 There would be no rail network local to this site. Acton Central railway and tube station would be approximately 1km away from the site.
River
5.1.12 The site would be more than 1.5km from the river, so there would be no river access and jetty/wharfage facilities.
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4
Page 7
Site suitability report S03EG station located within site C01YC. The route of the connection would also be required to pass beneath third-party buildings. 5.2.5 Data available on third-party assets and significant utilities show that the only items of concern in this area would be the three sewers adjacent to or within the site. Construction methods would be adopted, as appropriate, to mitigate potential settlement of these assets. Further detail about the site requirements for the CSO interception works is contained within Site suitability report C01YC, Acton Storm Tanks. It is likely that the proposed works can be constructed within the overall construction programme.
5.2.6 5.2.7
5.3
5.3.1 5.3.2
5.4
5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3
6 6.1
6.1.1
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
Page 8
Site suitability report S03EG Units 1 and 2 Bradford Road, application granted June 2007 (ref 2007/1926) for use as a hig- tech resource/study centre, museum of Asian music, housing of digital archives, interactive multimedia displays, space for workshops and recitals, and ancillary administrative office. Power House, 74 Stanley Gardens, Lawful Development Certificate for existing use of building for the teaching of vocals, keyboards, drums and guitars (Use Class D1) (ref 2010/1168), deemed permitted development, June 2010. Unit 1c, Long Island House, application granted for change of use from offices (Use Class B1a) to a centre for prayer and meditation (Use Class D1) in June 2011 (ref 2011/0105). 29 Warple Way to change of use from B1 to mixed B1and D1 (educational centre) (ref 2004/4032) Certificate of Lawfulness (ref 2010/0978) for the use of 41 Warple Way for the teaching of music (Use Class D1).
6.3
6.3.1
Planning context
The following is a summary of the relevant local planning policies and designations affecting the site, taken from the current statutory development plans for the London Borough of Ealing, as well as the neighbouring London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The local plans comprise the policies from the Ealing Unitary Development Plan, adopted in October 2004, and the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan, adopted in 2003. The London Borough of Ealing submitted its Development (or Core) Strategy to the Secretary of State on 21 July 2011. Following review of the submitted documents, we consider the relevant policies to be of material weight. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Core Strategy is subject to a binding Inspectors report and anticipated for formal adoption by the council in October 2011. Following review of the submitted documents, we consider the relevant policies to be of material weight.
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.3.5
Page 9
Site suitability report S03EG serving local residents in these residential areas. Planning should also have regard to other such uses essential for sustainable residential communities, such as open space, retail and employment-giving uses. Ealings emerging Development (or Core) Strategy identifies the site within the wider Uxbridge Road/Crossrail Corridor. Policy 2.1, Realising the potential of the Uxbridge Road/Crossrail Corridor, supports the sensitive development management of this area. 6.3.6 The site boundary backs onto residential garden space from properties along Hatfield Road. UPD policies 4.11 and 4.12 seek to protect the amenity of residential areas from the effects of noise, vibration and light pollution. Within the emerging Development (or Core) Strategy, Policy 1.1, Spatial Vision for Ealing 2026, environmental impacts of activities within the borough should be reduced, with air quality and ambient noise levels protected and improved, to create a clean and healthy environment for all. Ealings Acton Park Conservation Area is located opposite the site, across The Vale and the Bedford Park Conservation Area, approximately 265m to the south of the site. According to UDP Policy 4.8, Conservation Areas, the council will preserve or enhance the character and appearance of conservation areas and their settings. Part of the site is close to Southfield Playing Fields to the southwest and is in proximity to Acton Park to the north, beyond The Vale. UDP Policy 3.4, Public and Community Open Space, states that development on adjoining land to open space should preserve or enhance the open character. UDP Policy 3.1, Major Open Areas, is also applicable since Acton Park is designated MOL and adjacent development should not prejudice its purpose, sense of openness or environmental character. The site is in close proximity to a local nature conservation site, located within Southfield Playing Fields, to the southwest. UDP Policy 3.8, Biodiversity and Nature Conservation, and Policy 3.9, Wildlife Protection, promotes conservation and enhancement and will not permit development and other land use changes that will have an adverse effect on protected or priority species.
6.3.7
6.3.8
6.3.9
6.3.11
Page 10
Site suitability report S03EG protect the quality and character of the boroughs conservation areas within Policy BE1, Built Environment.
6.4
6.4.1
Planning comments
There are few planning designations that are applicable both on and adjacent to the site. These designations have been identified and described in Section 6.3, and those relating to employment uses and residential amenity are of most relevance to the proposed development. The site is located within a major employment location, and associated policies support industry and warehouse uses, and seek to maximise or retain employment potential. The council may require the temporary relocation of existing businesses to appropriate alternative premises within the local designated area, in accordance with these policies. However, it is worth noting that a number of non-employment uses have recently been granted for change of use on nearby sites, also within the designated area. This may indicate that other uses, such as the construction works associated with a main tunnel reception site, may also be acceptable in this location, particularly given that this use would be temporary and the area of works could be returned back to employment land once completed. The use of the site for the project and the potential conflict with employment policies would require further investigation and discussions with the local authority. The site is located in close proximity to residential properties, and protecting the amenity of the local residents is a significant consideration. The nearest residents are located on Hatfield Road, with the garden space backing onto the site. It is considered that due to the close proximity of the nearby residential properties to the site, noise, dust and traffic movements are likely to impact on residential amenity in the surrounding area. Appropriate mitigation measures would be required to reduce potential impacts and to protect amenity. The site layout could also be configured in order to locate the nosier construction activities further away from residential properties. A Scout hut is also located in close proximity to the site and is regularly used by a mums and toddlers group, and there are a number of other noise-sensitive uses, such as an educational music facility and a prayer and meditation centre. Again, appropriate mitigation would be required to reduce potential construction impacts on these community facilities and to safely manage construction traffic in the surrounding area. The site is in close proximity to Ealings Acton Park Conservation Area, separated by The Vale. Use of the site is not considered to have an unacceptable impact on the setting or appearance of this conservation area, given the existing context and potential for mitigation. Part of the site is adjacent to Southfield Playing Fields to the southwest and is in close proximity to Acton Park to the north, beyond The Vale. Mitigation may be required to avoid potential amenity impacts arising from the construction works, in accordance with UDP Policy 3.4. Acton Park is also designated MOL, and mitigation may be required to reduce potential impact from the permanent works on openness and setting.
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.4.5
6.4.6
Page 11
Site suitability report S03EG 6.4.7 A local nature conservation site is located within Southfield Park, which is situated to the southwest of the site. Mitigation may be required to avoid potential impacts arising from the construction works on the designated area. A further assessment of heritage and environmental considerations is made in section 7.
6.4.8
7 7.1
7.1.1
7.2
7.2.1 7.2.2
Transport
The site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception site (a number of preliminary transport plans for the site are attached as Appendix 5). Despite the access route being constrained, the site is only likely to generate a small amount of HGV movements. The use of rail may not be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a reception site. Should the quantities be sufficient for rail transport, the potential for construction of rail sidings at Barnes Bridge would require further investigation. In order to enable road access for construction vehicles, some on-street parking will need to be removed. There is limited potential for the workforce to access the site by public transport, although some onsite parking would potentially be available.
7.3
7.3.1
Archaeology
On the basis of the information currently available, the site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site as the archaeological risk is likely to be low to medium. No records of archaeological receptors within the site have been identified at this stage, and the site has been subjected to disturbance by modern development. Available geotechnical information suggests that deeply stratified deposits and waterlogged deposits are unlikely to be present. A further desk-based assessment would be required to confirm the above, should this site be progressed.
7.4
7.4.1
7.4.2
Page 12
Site suitability report S03EG During construction, the potential loss of vegetation and buildings, and the presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings onsite would impact on the character of the site and local views. Permanent elements are likely to be incorporated into the industrial estate and will only have a minimal impact.
7.5
7.5.1
7.5.2
7.6
7.6.1
Ecology
This site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site and may require only basic ecological surveys if selected. Should notable or protected species be present, it is likely that some limited habitat mitigation or compensation would be required.
7.7
7.7.1
Flood risk
This site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site because although there may be constraints on SUDS due to space and suitability for infiltration, the site lies in Flood Zone 1 (greater than one in 1,000-year flood extent).
7.8
7.8.1
Air quality
This site is suitable for use as a main tunnel reception site. There is a low potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at residential receptors closest to the site. However, these impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts. However, this can be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
7.9
7.9.1
Noise
This site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site. Although residential receptors are located close to the site, existing buildings should provide shielding from most construction works. However, the number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and their access routes (close to residential areas) has the potential to cause disturbance to properties lining those access routes. If possible, other access routes for vehicles to the site should be investigated.
Page 13
7.10
7.10.1
Land quality
The site is less suitable as a main tunnel reception site based on the high potential for contamination to have occurred from the onsite engineering works and industrial estate, and from offsite activities to have impacted shallow groundwater which may have migrated beneath the site. The identified sources of contamination may impact on site workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/vapour inhalation exposure pathways.
8 8.1
8.1.1
8.2
8.2.1
Socio-economic profile
The site is in the Southfield ward of the London Borough of Ealing. Statistics from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2001 Census data show the following relevant indicators for the ward, in comparison to the rest of Ealing, London and England as a whole: The ward has a mixed population, with a lower percentage of white British people than the average for England. The ward has an unemployment rate just lower than the national average, and a high percentage of high-level qualifications.
8.3
8.3.1
8.3.2
8.3.3
Page 14
Site suitability report S03EG 8.3.4 There are a large number of commercial properties, opposite the site to the west on the Acton Park Estate and to the east of the site, which may be affected by its use. There are a number of community facilities located to the south of the site, including a Scout hut which is regularly used by a mums and toddlers group, an educational music facility, and a prayer and meditation centre. Given the requirement to use road transport to remove excavated materials from this site, the use of this location for a main tunnel reception site may cause some further impacts on the local community due to increased road traffic in the area. In addition to the works on the Acton Park Estate site, a separate worksite will also be required on the Acton Storm Tanks site to intercept the CSO, and a connection culvert would need to be created to link the interception chamber to the main tunnel reception site. There are a large number of residential properties opposite and overlooking the eastern side of the Acton Storm Tanks site, and further properties in close proximity to the south and west. These properties may be impacted by the CSO interception works. As it appears likely that around five business premises will be lost due to the construction and operational site requirements, a number of commercial businesses may need to be permanently relocated. This may impact on the business owners, employees and the local community. Given the commercial/industrial nature of much of the surrounding area, the need to locate a ventilation building and column on site should not impact on the local community.
8.3.5
8.3.6
8.3.7
8.3.8
9 9.1
9.1.1
9.2
9.2.1
9.3
9.3.1
Land to be acquired
The site comprises an area known as the Acton Park Industrial Estate.
9.4
9.4.1
Page 15
9.5
9.5.1
9.6
9.6.1
9.7
9.7.1
9.7.2
9.8
9.8.1
10 10.1
10.1.1
10.2
10.2.1 10.2.2
Engineering
Site S03EG is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception site, as it would be of sufficient size and would have suitable access arrangements. Site enabling works would require the demolition of the existing structures which currently occupy the site. CSO interception would be outside the site and would require a secondary satellite CSO site at C01YC Acton Storm Tanks. It is anticipated that a tunnelled connection culvert would be required to convey flows from C01YC to S03EG.
10.3
10.3.1
Planning
This site is considered less suitable for use as a main tunnel reception site.
Page 16
Site suitability report S03EG 10.3.2 The site is within or in proximity to a number of planning and environmental policy designated areas and sensitive uses, such as residential properties, community facilities and public open spaces. Further investigation would be required to determine if the temporary loss of designated employment land and the relocation of a number of existing businesses would be acceptable. Appropriate mitigation to protect the amenity of residential dwellings and other sensitive community uses from construction impacts would be required.
10.4
10.4.1 10.4.2
Environment
Overall, the site is considered to be suitable as a main tunnel reception site, although mitigation would be required. Based on current information, the site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception site from the perspective of transport, archaeology, built heritage, townscape, water resources (hydrogeology and surface water), ecology, flood risk, air quality and noise. The site is considered less suitable from the perspective of land quality. Overall, the site is considered suitable, subject to further investigation of whether land quality impacts can be adequately mitigated. Likely mitigation considerations would include the following: Land quality any required remediation of contamination (at this high risk site) and/or measures to ensure no mobilisation of contaminants retained in situ.
10.4.3 10.4.4
10.5
10.5.1
10.5.2
10.6
10.6.1 10.6.2 10.6.3
Property
This site is less suitable. The advantages of the site are as follows: Limited advantages from a property perspective. A large number of business occupiers that would be displaced Site adjoins residential properties. The disadvantages of the site are as follows:
Page 17
10.7
10.7.1
Page 18
Appendices
Page 19
Page 20
Planning
London Borough of Ealing online planning applications database Saved policies in the Ealing Unitary Development Plan, adopted in 2004 Saved policies in the Hammersmith and Fulham Unitary Development Plan, adopted in 2003 Ealing Development (or Core) Strategy, submission document, July 2011 Hammersmith and Fulham Core Strategy, post submission amendments arising during examination, published May 2011
Environment
Transport Map of Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) www.tfl.gov.uk Bus Route Maps: North-east, north-west, south-west, south-east www.tfl.gov.uk Crossrail Plans www.crossrail.co.uk/crossrail-bill-documents PTAL scores Obtained from Table 2.3 information Thames Path map www.walklondon.org.uk Capital Ring www.walklondon.org.uk Cycle Routes www.sustrans.org.uk and Local Cycling Guides 1-14 Design Manual for Roads and Bridge TD 42/95, Highways Agency
Archaeology Historic Environment data from Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service (GLAAS) National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens
Appendix 1 Page 1
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 1 London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre (LAARC) Local authority websites Bing maps
Built heritage and townscape Local authority lists of Locally Listed Buildings National Monuments Record for some additional information regarding registered historic parks and gardens Unitary development plan and DPDs Local authority websites Bing maps
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Local authority details of unlicensed abstractors Environment Agency abstraction licence details Environment Agency groundwater levels and contour maps (2009-11) Environment Agency water quality (surface water and groundwater) Environment Agency Groundwater Source Protection Zones Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Envirocheck British Geological Survey (BGS) logs BGS 1:50,000 Geological Sheets Solid and Drift Editions (England and Wales) BGS Geology of London Special Memoir for 1:50,000 Geological sheets 256 (North London), 257 (Romford), 270 (South London) and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales) Crossrail (2005) Assessment of Water Impacts Technical Report: Appendix C Baseline Data. Figure C.4: Extent of Saline Intrusion based on 177 mg/l *5mmol/l) Isochlor
Ecology Thames Estuary Partnership (2002) Tidal Thames Habitat Action Plan London Biodiversity Action Plan www.lbp.org.uk Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) www.magic.gov.uk - statutory designated sites London Wildweb wildweb.london.gov.uk - non-statutory site of importance for nature conservation Black redstart distribution in London www.blackredstarts.org.uk/ pages/.html
Appendix 1 Page 2
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 1 National Biodiversity Network http://searchnbn.net - distribution of protected species Google Maps aerial views of habitat features BAP habitats www.natureonthemap.org.uk Priority habitats and species on national and local scales www.ukbap.org.uk
Flood risk Environment Agency Flood Map www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency National Flood and Coastal Defence Database Envirocheck
Air quality Local authority websites London Air Quality Network www.londonair.org.uk Defra UK-AIR, air quality information resource www.airquality.co.uk Defra Air Quality Management Areas http://aqma.defra.gov.uk Defra Local Air Quality Management http://laqm.defra.gov.uk
Noise Envirocheck Identification of receptors Promap Calculation of distances between site and receptors Multimap Aerial photography www.multimap.co.uk Defra noise maps Identification of existing noise levels
Land quality Google Maps/Earth Site walkover information Envirocheck Data Sheets provided as a GIS Database British Geological Survey (BGS) logs
Appendix 1 Page 3
Property
Promap, Ordnance Survey and A-Z mapping Multimap/Google Earth aerial/satellite photographs Mouchel referencing
Appendix 1 Page 4
Appendix 2 Page 1
EN
TI AL FI D
S03EG
Area of Main Map
C01YC
&
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site Short Listed CSO Site
EALING
! (
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
50
100
200
300
400
Metres
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02137 Date : .................................. 2011/10/27 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
HOUNSLOW
! (
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
Appendix 3 Page 1
TI AL
D BROMYAR
EN
AY OAK W
EN MAPLE AV
VENUE LARCH A
AC EAST
RO A
FI D
AVENUE
UE
ANE TON L
BIRK BECK
BEECH AVENUE
CENT
DU CROS RO
VENU RE A
&
THE VALE
MEW ESSEX PARK S
Legend
DORD
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site Short Listed CSO Site
EG VAL
YG NL E STA
AN EASTM
AD
E RO V
LR SEL MAN
R ECH
OVE
S AGNE
E ARD
ROAD
GR
D T RO A
BIR KBE CK
ROAD
NS
Y BEARDSLEY WA
OAD
S03EG
A EY RO HOLL
E PL AR W
EALING
TI MUL
WAY
25
50
100 Metres
HA TF
AD
IEL DR
HA CAN
MR
OAD
AY W
150
200
Y LEFRO
EN LARD
ALEXANDRA ROAD
OA D
G BY
GR E
C01YC
EN E ND RO
OLD R COBB
OAD
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02082 Date : .................................. 2011/09/13 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
HA M ILT ON
RO
AD
EA D
CLOVELLY ROAD
BROO KFIEL D
RO
AD
HA WK SH
Legend
GRAHAM ROAD
ST ALBANS AVENUE
ALL AV E NUE
Development Sites
RUSTH
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written D permission of Thames Water Utilities It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the ROALimited. E R RYMED BEproposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
Y WILKINSON WA
SOUTHFIELD ROAD
ROAD
ROAD
AD
STRAUSS ROAD
SHIRL EY ROAD
U SO
CARLTON ROAD
THF D IEL RO
ROAD
SPEL DH
UR ST
R OA
WHELLOCK ROAD
N WE
R LL DE
D OA
D OA
AD
E THE AV NUE
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
N LY EM
FIELDING ROAD
HOUNSLOW
RO AD
TI AL
D BROMYAR
EN
AY OAK W
EN MAPLE AV
VENUE LARCH A
AC EAST
RO A
FI D
AVENUE
UE
ANE TON L
BIRK BECK
BEECH AVENUE
CENT
DU CROS RO
VENU RE A
&
THE VALE
MEW ESSEX PARK S
Legend
DORD
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site Short Listed CSO Site
EG VAL
YG NL E STA
AN EASTM
AD
E RO V
LR SEL MAN
R ECH
OVE
S AGNE
E ARD
ROAD
GR
D T RO A
BIR KBE CK
ROAD
NS
Y BEARDSLEY WA
OAD
S03EG
A EY RO HOLL
E PL AR W
EALING
TI MUL
WAY
25
50
100 Metres
HA TF
AD
IEL DR
HA CAN
MR
OAD
AY W
150
200
Y LEFRO
EN LARD
ALEXANDRA ROAD
OA D
G BY
GR E
C01YC
EN E ND RO
OLD R COBB
OAD
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02083 Date : .................................. 2011/09/13 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
Y WILKINSON WA
ROAD
ROAD
HA M ILT ON
HA WK SH
P P P P P P
! ! ! ! ! !
! !
EA D
BROO KFIEL D
RO
AD
* #
RO
Legend
AD
SOUTHFIELD ROAD
AD
STRAUSS ROAD
SHIRL EY ROAD
U SO
ST ALBANS AVENUE
! ! ! !
! !
ALL AV E NUE
Sites of Nature Conservation Importance Flood Risk Zone 3 AD SOMERSET RO Flood Risk Zone 2
RUSTH
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written D permission of Thames Water Utilities It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the ROALimited. E R RYMED BEproposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
CARLTON ROAD
THF D IEL RO
ROAD
SPEL DH
UR ST
R OA
WHELLOCK ROAD
N WE
R LL DE
D OA
D OA
AD
E THE AV NUE
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
FIELDING ROAD
* # # * * # HOUNSLOW * # * # # *
Title:
N LY EM RO AD
BIRK BECK
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
TI AL
D BROMYAR
EN
AY OAK W
EN MAPLE AV
VENUE LARCH A
AC EAST
RO A
FI D
AVENUE
UE
ANE TON L
BEECH AVENUE
CENT VENU RE A
DU CROS RO
&
THE VALE
MEW ESSEX PARK S
Legend
DORD
AF
!
LR SEL MAN
OVE
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site Short Listed CSO Site
EG VAL
YG NL E STA
AN EASTM
AD
E RO V
R ECH
S AGNE
E ARD
ROAD
GR
D T RO A
BIR KBE CK
ROAD
NS
Y BEARDSLEY WA
OAD
S03EG
A EY RO HOLL
E PL AR W
EALING
TI MUL
WAY
25
50
100 Metres
HA TF
AD
IEL DR
HA CAN
MR
OAD
AY W
150
200
Y LEFRO
EN LARD
ALEXANDRA ROAD
OA D
G BY
GR E
C01YC
EN E ND RO
OLD R COBB
OAD
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02084 Date : .................................. 2011/09/13 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
HA M ILT ON
RO
AD
EA D
CLOVELLY ROAD
BROO KFIEL D
RO
AD
HA WK SH
GRAHAM ROAD
Y WILKINSON WA
SOUTHFIELD ROAD
ROAD
ROAD
AD
STRAUSS ROAD
SHIRL EY ROAD
U SO
CARLTON ROAD
THF D IEL RO
ROAD
ST ALBANS AVENUE
ALL AV E NUE
Legend
SPEL DH
UR ST
R OA
WHELLOCK ROAD
N WE
R LL DE
D OA
D OA
AD
E THE AV
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
RUSTH
FIELDING ROAD
HOUNSLOW
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written D permission of Thames Water Utilities It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the ROALimited. E R RYMED BEproposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
Title:
N LY EM RO
NUE
AD
Appendix 4 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
S03EG
C01YC
&
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed Shaft Site Short Listed CSO Site
EALING
! (
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
50
100
200
300
400
Metres
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way. Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02140 Date : .................................. 2011/11/02 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
HOUNSLOW
! (
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
Looking across the site to the west. The industrial units are located to the bottom of the image.
Appendix 4 Page 3
View looking north from the southern boundary of the Acton Storm Tanks site.
Appendix 4 Page 4
Appendix 5 Page 1
FI D
EN
TI AL
&
Legend
AF
Local Authority Boundary Short Listed CSO Site TfL Road Network Thames Path
50
100
200 Metres
300
400
Mapping reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. Crown copyright and database right 2011. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100019345 CH2M HILL accept no responsibility for any circumstances, which arise from the reproduction of this map after alteration, amendment or abbreviation or if it issued in part or issued incomplete in any way.
S03EG
Map Ref : ............................ 1PL04-SS-02148 Date : .................................. 2011/10/25 Projection : .......................... British National Grid
C01YC
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Title:
This is an indicative working draft plan which has been produced for the purpose of confidential discussions only. Accordingly, the draft plan must not be copied, distributed or shown to any third party without the express written permission of Thames Water Utilities Limited. It provides an indication of sites that, following discussions with local authorities and other stakeholders, may be confirmed as being on the shortlist of construction sites for the proposed Thames Tunnel. Inclusion of a site on this draft plan should not be taken to mean that such site will be selected as a construction site to form part of the Thames Tunnel scheme.
HOUNSLOW
1
CEN TRE
4
CR
5
111
3 1 1
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
6 1 1
0 2 1
8.4m
B L
CR
THE VALE
Garage
O AD M AN R EAST
1 3 2
y r o g e r e G s u o H
Warehouse
FB
A
1
7.9m
7 to 11
1 1
4 o1 4t
5 1
0 1
2 3
7 1
0 o1 5t
El Sub Sta
Y A DW E I L L A
0 2 o t 5 1
6
9 2
lmpress
House
Warehouse
8 2
1 3
23
6 2
7.3m
D A O DR R O F D A R B
Warple Mews
6 3
8
o7 1t
30
5 3
7 3
s o i d u t nS u S
1 1
Posts
6 2
Warehouse
a t bS u LS E
32
6 1
9 5 1
6.1m
33
1 7 1
0 5 1
Overstone House
4 3
6 3
8 1
37
9 3
6.4m
1 to 19
40
Works
g n o L
1 to 11
9 1
4 2
13 to 22
o t
5 2
23 to 37
8 2
o 5t
7 2
Playground
3 4 24
6 0
9 3
4 8
5.8m
R OA D
1 to 72
Playing Fields
3 6
5.8m Hall
2 8
7 2
3 2
Tennis Court
Tesla Court
1 4
8 1
3 1
10 m
100 m
3 1
PC
1
6.1m
SCALE 1 : 1000
2
Revision History
A D
1 to 55
B Y
Sewage Pumping
1 4
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
AA
FIRST ISSUE
JSHE
EPER
PSTV
13/10/2011
Court
SITE ACCESS
1 5
4
0 4 1
2 6
6 4 1
2 4 1
8 4 1
168
4 6 1
2 6 1
1 7
2 7 1
4 8 1
7.0m
D A O DR L E I F H 7.6m T U O S
LB
49
E l S u b
A D
7.4m
57
59
S A LT C
2 1 o t 5
3 2
9 3
St Peters Church
6 2
27
1 1
7 3
6 2
4 3
1 3
an d
7 2
Vic
El Sub Sta
Parish Hall
AD STRAUSS RO
n y l m E s n e d r a G
E L W ARP
3 3
OS Reference:
1 2
5 3
5 2
9 2 o2 7t 0 2
3 1
3 2
9 2
15
A D
1 1
I LT O
EALING
a 1
A M
40
RO
32
5.8m
24
22
16
8 8
KS HE AD
B o r o
2 0
4 1
7 6 1 o t 3 4 1
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
o n s t , G
5 0 2
B R O O K F I E L DR O A D
5 9
HA W
A s l y
12
9
o n s t & L B B d y
f De
Drawing Title:
o 9t 8 1
y r e g r u S
2 7
LB
4 4
5
TCBs
OR C DR EST I VE ER
El Su bS t a
PLOTTED ON
04/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
B R O O K F I E L DR O A D
100-DE-TRA-S03EG-840101
r af t
1 2
AD
1:1000
A1
AA
5 0
6 1
5 3
7.8m
3 3
e g d d a o e L M
9
14
2 3
3 5
4 7
71
83
8 5
8 7
91
r e t l e h S
6.1m
4 2 1 6 2 1
R O A D
5 0
9 4 2 o t 0 3 2 9 6 2 o t 0 5 2
t r u a Co e L 9 2 o2 5t 1 2
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2079
UBR
Sub Process:
JYAS
WASTE
7 4
1 0 0
A T S
S t a
G R E E N E N D
Un d
6.7m
6 3 1 8 3 1
r e t l e h S
3 8
on f i de nt i al
El Sub Sta
1
1 5 0
d r o f g n o L t r u Co o t
Station
Edison
2 0 0 mm
H A T F I E L D
6 o1 2t 2
D A O MR A H N A C
0 7 1
6.1m
0 8 1
Y WA I T L MU
1 to 66
1 to 40
0 6 1
Tanks
Watt Court
D f e
2 5 1
El Sub Sta
1 3 o t 6 2
REMOVE EXISTING ONE-WAY ON WARPLE WAY BETWEEN COBBOLD ROAD AND CANHAM ROAD
41 to 84
6 3 4 1 3 1
B
4 7 o t 8 5
0 2
6.7m
4 6 6 6
BS
d n U
1 to 38
Charles Court
Anthony Court
2 3 1
4 1 o t 0 1
6
4 3
5 o t 1
6 4
SITE EGRESS
RD GA EY NL STA
7 4 1
37
5 o t 3
3 1
1 3
9 9 1
1 0 . 3 m
9 8 3 to 1 8 1
3 9 1
Wa r d B d y
9.6m
1 1 o t 1
7.9m
5
1 6 1
8.9m
9 6 1
7 7 1
SUSPEND SECTIONS OF PARKING ON WARPLE WAY AND STANLEY GARDENS. EXTENTS TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY.
3 4 1
8.5m
7 2 1
PO
1 4 1
9 5 1
9 7 1
1 8 1
NU AVE E
RO AD DU CROS
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
Larden Hall
11
2
THIS DRAWING
WS E KM R A XP E S S E
7.2m
O AD EN R ARD L
5 0 2 o t 3 0 2
3 3
73
5 3
5 7
89
97
257
259
261
AY EW L RP WA
RD GA EY L AN ST
R EG L VA E OV
1
5
4 1
S EN
7.0m
8 1
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
RO EG L VA VE
7
5
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN
6 3
6 2
e s u o h e r Wa
7 1
0 1
8 2
LR EL NS MA D OA
o 7t 1 5 2
o4 1t
N TM A EAS D RO A
SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
9 2
1 2
Cherry Court
6.4m
7 2
NOTES TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW: 1. SUSPENSION OF PARKING ON WARPLE WAY AND STANLEY GARDENS. EXTENTS TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY. REMOVAL OF ONE - WAY SYSTEM ON STANLEY GARDENS AND WARPLE WAY TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY. WIDENING OF CANHAM ROAD TO SUIT ARTICULATED VEHICLE SWEPT PATHS. TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY. AMENDMENTS TO SIGNING AND LINING AT STANLEY GARDENS JUNCTION WITH THE VALE, TO BE AGREED WITH LOCAL AUTHORITY.
e t a t s kE r a nP o t Ac
7 3 a 7 3
4 3
4 2
o 6t
0 1
2.
1 2 1
27
0 6
o t 35
5 3 1
3 2 1
3.
D A O AR T T E L A V
6.1m
d n U
FW
4.
CW
o t 41
S EN
W F
F C
PROVISIONAL DURATIONS: MAIN SITE - 7 YEARS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT - 7 YEARS TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PHASES - 1
0 5
W t n i o p t s e
LEGEND
D RO A EN ARD L
9 3
C m a h n a
d n a l s I H e s u o
R A E L P
TEMPORARY WORKS
W Y A
w e
EXCAVATION
7 6
7 8
CONSTRUCTION ROUTE
o or B C ,G t s on L y l s A C t& s on LB dy B
BUS STOP BS
OAD XANDRA R E AL
2 1
0 1
3
1
4 1
0 1
8 0 1 0 1 1
6 0 2
AD BO NHEUR RO
EY RO AD RL SHI
17
30
U SO O DR EL FI TH
t r u y Co e l r e v Be 2 8 1
EK W AY
o 8t 6 1
E S N NU BA VE AAL ST
4 0 2
4 9 1
4 0 1 6 0 1
8 2
4 1
AD
0 9
e n i a l r Ve
gC n i d Ro
4 7
t r u o
1 0
Appendix 6 Page 1
1
22
5
CEN TRE NU AVE E
0 2 1
2
22
3
IL4.53m DBV014667 SYPHON EV 3 0 0 4" ABANDONED 0010 3 7 5 D E N O D N A B 0012 A 0 0 " 3 0 3 8.5m < 600 0 0 3 0006 0013 782 IL4.03m 783 WO
PC
4
D 0 E N 5 O 4 D N A B A " 0 3
8.4m 7.9m CR
5
5 7 3 " 4 2 " 4 2005 N6 "
LB
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
6 1 1
THE VALE
5 8 7 9 0 M D
787
257
786
785 9004
0 30
Garage
FB
b u S l E a t S
" 2
4 o1 4t
0 1
2 3
7904
0 o1 5t
WO 7905
" 2
El Sub Sta
D E I L L A
Y WA
1904
" "2 3
lmpress
House
Warehouse
" 6
7807
0806 728
0 6
30
S03EG (70515m)
4
BD 0903
5 2 2
D " A 9 O R
1905
7.3m
600 724
e t a t s kE r a nP o t Ac
SYPHON
143 0 5 54 2 2
o7 1t
D R O F D A R B
D E R E T E 5 o M t 1
8 2
142
1804
27 9" mm 50 " 1 400 2 1
s o i d u t nS u S
1 1
1"
a t bS u LS E
Posts
32
CON 247N
0 2
33
IL6.21m
WW
A VE N U E R O A D S E WE 1 5 2 R 4
6 2
Warehouse
0803
R 1805 P S m m 0 5 1
6 1
8803
El Sub Sta
4 3
1 2 1 9 B O L L O
Tanks
RE
6 3
2801
37
B R I D G E
R O A D
S E WE R
8801 8802 SE
1 5 2 4
0802 0801
9 1
Works
6"39
4 2
726
m9 3 0 m 1 1 0 2 8 01 3 5 1 x
F
9 3
1801
"
1 to 11
Y WA I T L MU
1 to 66
2803
13 to 22
Watt Court
1 2 1 9
5 2
" 2 IL1.95m
o t
23 to 37
8 2
8702
o 5t
8701
8 2 9 1 1 4 3
727 1723
7 6
A V
D E R E T E 2715 M " 3
1
2706
6.1m
Ampere House
9703
1 200 1 21 9 x 81 3
00m 21 2 5 m
2 2 5 - 374 <
IL5.7m
6 0
E N U E
1721 1722
2702
" 4 0 5 1
3
9706
1720
5.8m
Playing Fields
9704
3 6
B O L L O B R I D G E
IL5.64m
0705 8 2 7
5.8m
1719 PS
0 5 1 m m 0 0 1
1704
3 2
9705
4 2
5 2 2 -2 < 2 5
IL5.07m
Hall
1702
7 2
2 8
Tennis Court
28
4 "
SE W
1 4
1703 2701
E R
3 m m 6
3 0 0 N
2705
2710 1 5 0 0
2708
LB dy B
GAS
4701
D E N O D N A B A
8 9
5 2 2
3 1
SITE BOUNDARY
9612
2 1
3 1
2 2 5
HA T F I E L D
< -
9 0 0
2 2 5
PC
A D
B Y
225
1 4
1 to 66
Station
Edison Court
7605
El Sub Sta
7606
0602 0605
6 4 1
2 4 1
1628
2 2
4
0 4 1
1606
2 6
225
"
1 5 0 0 x 1 0 0 0
3 8
8 4 1
168
4 6 1
"
2 6 1
9607
3 7 5
2 7 1
> -
709
S A LT C
30 0
14
9 3
St Peters Church
2 5
27
5 3
"
3 3
7 2
Vic
Parish Hall
225
1
5 2
9503
3 1
700 9504
< -
8503
8504
EY RO AD RL SHI
225
1501
30
>
1 3
9 2
0512
3 2
5 2 706 2
4 0 1 6 0 1
A D
1 1
0 5 1
1 2
1 5 0
0511
I LT O
367
a 1
A M
0 5 1
IL4.43m
ER
AD
2 5
2501
SE W
24
RO
644
40
32
5.8m
THAMES TUNNEL
e n a Cr t r u Co
RO AD
4 "
2 2 5
22 5
8501
83
8 5
< -
SO UT HF
9501
3 5
3 0 0 158
2 2 5
y r e g r u S
2 7
LB
I EL D
2 2 5
4 7
9502
OR C DR EST I VE ER
4 "
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
60 0
8505
5 9
0 B R O O K F I E L DR O A D
HA W
159
3 0
<
150
A s l y
Drawing Title:
12
300
o n s t &
L B B d y
3516 IL3.12m
f De
IL2.35m
TCBs
0504
0503
0508
4"WM
5 2 2
4 4
RAMP
100-DL-PNC-S03EG-140001
x 1 2 5
160
< -
3 0 0
225
KS HE AD
71
< -
2 2 5
8502
22
B o r o
8506
4 1
o n s t , G
3520 SE IL-0.92m
7 6 1 o t 3 4 1
Contract Name:
r af t
6 1
5 3
7.8m
0510
0509
353
7 4
3505
Location / Town:
1:500
A1
AA
5 0
15
0502
4 3
2 2 5
0501
17
n y l m E s n e d r a G
EK E W AY L W ARP
an d
116
9508
2 2 5 4 "
1 2
3 2
1 1
7 3
3 3
8 7
91
r e t l e h S
6.1m
4 2 1 6 2 1
3 1
89
5 7 3
7603
73
5 7
5 7 3
97
708
59
8602
u b
S t a
354
G R 1605 E E N E N D R O A D
3602
d r o f g n o L t r u Co
5 0
9 4 2 o t 0 3 2 9 6 2 o t 0 5 2
t r u a Co e L 9 2 o2 5t 1 2
6 2
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
5.2m
TQ2877
UBR
Sub Process:
APUR
3507
8 2
WASTE
1 0 0
57
5 7 3
0603
A 2 T 2 S R 5 O A D
225
49
7602 0 5 4
7604
8601
7.4m
7.0m
LB
8604
5 7 3
9602
5 7 3
9603
5 7 3
Un d
6.7m
r e t l e h S
0 5 4
8603
0 5 4
9601
0 5 4
9604
0 5 4
<
225
679
1 7
27
0 5 4
0 5 4
9605
2 2 5
C01YC (16992m)
D 4601 E N O D N A B A D
3605 5 2 2 3606
e l Mo t r u Co
5.2m
5 2 2 WO
m m 5 2 1
A O DR L O B B O C
on f i de nt i al
HW
HW
1 5 0
ST BUR PE I m P 80m 1
1 5
<
9611
225
0 1
RO 2 2 A D
9 0 0
2
SV
2601
10 m
40 m
Mast
9613
9614 0601
D ST GEO RGES ROA 4"
6.1m
0604 355
2 2 5 4 "
3603
SCALE 1 : 500
m 80m 00 1 3
Revision History
0 1 1
3604
1 to 55
Iss
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
Sewage Pumping
3601
Vandervell Court
AA
FIRST ISSUE
CMUR
PSTV
JSWE
19/08/2011
2 0 0 mm
874 4 " 2 2 5
RO AD
IL5.61m
WO 1 7 5 x 3 6 C 1 0 ON
WW
9 0 0
2 H 5 A T F I E L D R OA 2 D 2
4 8
1 1 4 3
6 o1 2t 2
2716
2703 1 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
E R
IL1.92m
4 "
2707
IL5.15m
1 8 2 9
R O A D
S E W
3 4 24
169
2712
D A O MR A H N A C
1 to 40
" 4
o or B
2709
WO
C
2713
on C0 5 1
2704
2 5 1
" 3
0 5 1
0 7 1
0 8 1
4 1 o t 0 1
6
4 3
E R 1901 I F
0 5 1
Warple Mews
WO 1802 1806
6.7m
BD
1803
E R I F
1808
m
Overstone House
0 2 o t 5 1
m m 0 0 1
0 5 1
0 5 1
9 5 1
1 7 1
IL2.06m
0 0 3 " 4
5 o t 3
1 3
3 3
5 3
6 3
D E R E T E "M 2
e s u o h e r Wa
9 9 1
1 0 . 3 m
3 0 0
8003
784 DM09735
B L
0011
723
9 8 3 to 1 8 1
3 9 1
9.6m
0 0 3
WO DBV014665
5 2 2
DBV014666
1 1 o t 1
y r o g e r e G s u o H
772
0902
1 8 1
0 0 3
0 0 3
9 7 1
7004
8001
0008
6"
0007
Warehouse
7.9m
D E R E T E M
" 4
5
E R I F
7.9m
815
E R I F
9 6 1
1 6 1
8.9m
9 5 1
8004
7 7 1
9002
D E N O 0 D 0 N 3 A B "A 0 3
781
1004
1005
1001
7 to 11
3 4 1
9003
5 7 3
RO AD DU CROS
1 4 1
5 2 2 244
780 2004
2002 289 1
" 4
2001
7 2 1
5 2 2
5 7 3
2003
5 2 2
5 DBV014691 2 2
PO
FOR INFORMATION
Keyplan:
N
225
5 22
4"
THIS DRAWING
11
9 4" 82 1
300
0 20 1
9"
288
2 2 5
WS E KM R A XP E S S E
Ground level 102 (m OD + 100) 100 (m OD + 100) Base of Made Ground and Superficial
RE 4" FI
225
5 0 2 o t 3 0 2
1 3 2
259
1 50mm METERED
1 "
RE 2" FI
RE 2" FI RE 2" FI
3001
0 30
AY EW L m RP WA 00m
METERED
5 22
RD GA EY L AN ST
O AD M AN R EAST
RO EG L VA
4" VE
1
5
4"
S EN
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE
6"
Suggested invert level of shaft 76.21 (m OD + 100)
3
NUMBER 100019345
R EG L VA E OV
50 1
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
0 20 1
4"
9 1 ( 00 1
0 1
9"
4"
8 2
) 92
mm 50 1
N TM A EAS D RO A
9 2
1 2
0 30
0 20 1
Cherry Court
COORDINATES ARE TO ORDNANCE SURVEY DATUM OSGB36. ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO THE TUNNEL DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN. Base of Lambeth Group 41 (m OD + 100)
23
) 990 1 I( m D 00m 1
NOTES: 1. LIMITED FIBRE OPTIC AND BT COMMUNICATION CABLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. DETAILS OF THESE CABLES AND OTHER SERVICES AND THIRD PARTY ASSETS TO BE CONFIRMED BY FURTHER STUDIES AND UTILITY SEARCHES. 2. INVERT LEVEL OF SHAFT SHOWN. BASE OF CONSTRUCTION WILL BE BELOW THIS LEVEL AND WILL DEPEND ON CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE. THIS IS ONLY PROVISIONAL AS DESIGN IS AT EARLY PRELIMINARY STAGE.
0 60
a 7 3
o 6t 0 1
2807
0 5 1
0 05 1
050 1 75 x 6
o t 35
2 RD GA EY NL STA
25
7 4 1
790
9 1 2 1
3 1 x 8
5 2 2
LEGEND
FW FW
37 o t 41
5 1
22 5
m 0 0 1
4 6 6 6
FOUL WATER
S EN
2802
0 0
5 22
" 0 9 0 2 1
SW
SW
SURFACE WATER
4 "
CLEAN WATER
5 1 m 0
Chalk
5 1 0
GAS
W t n i o p t s e
R I E
CABTV
CABTV
FIBRE OPTICS
5 22
0 7
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
9Def AR 1 W 2 1
4" 225
0 0 2 use 1 o
d n a l s I
LV
LV
E L P
m 3 1 m 0 8 AY 0
C m a h n a M
HV
HV
SYNTHETIC GEOLOGICAL PROFILE DERIVED FROM THE BGS LONDON LITHOFRAME50 MODEL, HISTORICAL BOREHOLES AND BERRY (1979). PLEASE NOTE, GROUND CONDITIONS MAY VARY AND THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR DETAILED D ENGINEERING PURPOSES E N O D Playground N A B A
w e
s
EXISTING TUNNELS
N TO AC
225
7 8
3"
D RE TE ME
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
WATER STORM & FOUL SEWERS - ALL TW ASSETS - ALL TW ASSETS
3"
E AL W SE
D E N O D N A B A
4" 225
NDRA AD RO EXA AL
5 1
ER
4 3
6 8
300
5 1 0
1 to 72
OTHER SIGNIFICANT UTILITIES ARE DEFINED AS: TELECOMS ELECTRICITY - ONLY FIBRE OPTIC CABLES - HIGH VOLTAGE CABLES - LARGE BANKS OF LOW VOLTAGE CABLES
Anthony Court
41 to 84
225
2
,G t s on L
y l s A
5 22
t& s
225
225
8 1
4"
ABA
2
2
NDO
NED
225
225 4"
225
225
22
5 2 0 -2 5 - 4 >
225
225 225
225
4 0 2
<-
5 37
6 3 1 8 3 1
4"
225
225
0 45
4"
4"
0 1
5 37
6 2
4 1
t r u e Co l d n 4 Wa 1 o2 3t 0 2
M A T S
8 0 1 0 1 1
225
225
6 0 2
AD BO NHEUR RO
>
AD STRAUSS RO
2 0 2
3 8 1
0 5 1
o t
D R O F
U SO
t r u y Co e l r e v Be
D 4" OA DR EL FI TH
K O O R B
o 8t 6 1
4 1
225
225
2 8 1
4"
W E S
7"
225
225
0 30
4 9 1
0 5 9
4"
R E
16
0 45
8 8
0 9
2 0
9 82 1
e n i a l r Ve
W (
5 37
T S E
H t C ee t Fl N r ou A C R B
->
gC n i d Ro
4"
9 2 8 1
4 7
9 1 2 1
600
t r u o
Appendix 7 Page 1
e g d o aL i c a Ac
2
Tennis Courts Tennis
Games Court
3
Courts
4
TCBs
5
Ward Bdy
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
7.6m
N
E L A EV H T
7.9m
Bryant Court
LB
CEN
1 to 42
PC
CR
97
FOR INFORMATION
111
2
6 1 1
0 2 1
8.4m
B L
CR
THE VALE
A
2
Garage
SECONDARY CRANE
FB
y r o g e r e G s u o H
Warehouse
b u S l E a t S
1 1
4 o1 4t
5 1
2 3
0 1
7 1
0 o1 5t
El Sub Sta
PRIMARY CRANE
6
Y A DW E I L L A
0 2 o t 5 1
0 1
1000m
1 2
9 2
lmpress
House
Warehouse
8 2
5 o t 1
1 3
23
500m
D A O DR R O F D A R B
7.3m
5 3
S S E C C A
7 3
8
o7 1t
s o i d u t nS u S
30
1 1
6 2
Posts
Warehouse
a t bS u LS E
32
0 2
6 1
9 5 1
6.1m
33
4 3
6 3
3 8 1
37
9 3
6.4m
40
Works
g n o L
1 to 11
9 1
4 2
13 to 22
o t
5 2
23 to 37
o 5t
7 2
Playground
3 4 24
6 0
9 3
4 8
5.8m
R OA D
1 to 72
Playing Fields
3 6
Court
41 to 84
Hall
2 8
3 2
10 m
t& s on
40 m
Tennis Court
SCALE 1 : 500
1 4
8 1
3 1
HA T F I E L D
1 3
3 1
RO A D
Mast
Revision History
Iss
6.1m
1
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
PC
AA
D ST GEO RGES ROA
FIRST ISSUE
CMUR
PSTV
JSWE
19/08/2011
A D
1 to 55
B Y
1 4
1 to 66
Station
Edison Court
C01YC
1
El Sub Sta
4
0 4 1
2 4 1
2 6
6 4 1
8 4 1
168
4 6 1
2 6 1
1 7
D A O DR L O B B O C
2 7 1
4 8 1
7.0m
D A O DR L E I F H 7.6m T U O S
LB
49
A D
7.4m
57
59
Un d
6.7m
6 3 1 8 3 1
r e t l e h S
3 8
E l S u b
6m INTERCEPTION SHAFT
G R E E N E N D
d r o f g n o L t r u Co
A T S
S t a
S A LT C
5 0
9 6 2 o t 0 5 2
1 1
D
1 2
o4 1t
an d
3 2
9 3
St Peters Church
6 2
4 1
14
27
7 3
5 3
7 2
Vic
Parish Hall
AD STRAUSS RO
3 3
1 3
3 2
15
1 1
I LT O
1 2
a 1
A M
40
RO
32
5.8m
24
Drawing Title:
B o r o
2 0
22
16
8 8
KS HE AD
4 1
7 6 1 o t 3 4 1
o n s t , G
CONSTRUCTION PHASE LAYOUT S03EG / C01YC - MAIN RECEPTION SITE WITH CSO
Drawing No.: Scale: Sheet Size: Rev:
5 0 o2 9t 8 1
B R O O K F I E L DR O A D
5 9
HA W
A s l y
12
9
PLOTTED ON
02/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
y r e g r u S
L B B d y
o n s t &
100-DL-PNC-S03EG-140002
AD
6 1
5 3
7.8m
A D
INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
t r u y Co e l r e v Be 2 8 o1 8t 6 1
Project Name:
7 4
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
r af t
5 2
9 2 o2 7t 0 2
3 1
9 2
1:500
A1
AA
5 0
4 3
3 3
71
83
8 5
8 7
91
r e t l e h S
6.1m
4 2 1 6 2 1
R O A D
9 4 2 o t 0 3 2
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
CONNECTION CULVERT
6 2
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2079
UBR
Sub Process:
APUR
n y l m E s n e d r a G
2 0 2
WASTE
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
Sewage Pumping
Vandervell Court
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
C
7 2
5.8m
H A T F I E L D
6 o1 2t 2
D A O MR A H N A C
0 7 1
6.1m
0 8 1
EXISTING ACCESS
1 to 19
Y WA I T L MU
1 to 66
1 to 40
0 6 1
Tanks
Watt Court
D f e
2 5 1
El Sub Sta
0 5 1
S03EG
1 7 1
Overstone House
6 3 4 1 3 1
6.7m
4 6 6 6
BS
d n U
1 to 38
Charles Court
Anthony
2 3 1
4 1 o t 0 1
6
4 3
Warple Mews
CONNECTION CULVERT
3 2 1
5 o t 3
3 1
1 5
9 9 1
1 0 . 3 m
ACCESS
1 1 o t 1
1400m
6 3
1000m
5
9 8 3 to 1 8 1
3 9 1
Wa r d B d y
9.6m
7.9m
20m SHAFT
7.0m
7.9m
5
1 6 1
8.9m
9 6 1
7 to 11
3 4 1
8.5m
7 2 1
278
11
WS E KM R A XP E S S E
Cherry Court
7 4 1
3 1 1
1 4 1
9 5 1
7 7 1
9 7 1
1 8 1
TRE NU AVE E
Keyplan:
PO
RO AD DU CROS
S u r g e r y
DRAWING LOCATION
Larden Hall
7.2m
O AD EN R ARD L
5 0 2 o t 3 0 2
3 3
73
5 3
5 7
89
1 3 2
97
257
259
261
AY EW L RP WA
RD GA EY L AN ST
O AD M AN R EAST
R EG L VA E OV
1
5
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
4 1
S EN
3
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
6 3
8 1
R EG L VA E OV
7
5
6 2
e s u o h e r Wa
7 1
8 2
4 7 o t 8 5
LR EL NS MA D OA
7 2
N TM A EAS D RO A
9 2
6.4m
6 4
e t a t s kE r a nP o t Ac
7 3 a 7 3
4 3
4 2
o 6t 0 1
1 2 1
27
0 6
o t 35
5 3 1
D A O AR T T E L A V
6.1m
RD GA EY NL STA S EN
d n U
FW
37 o t 41
CW
KEY:
F C
W F F C
0 5
W t n i o p t s e
D RO A EN ARD L
9 3
C
CSO DROP SHAFT, CSO CONNECTION CULVERT, PRIMARY CRANE, SECONDARY CRANE AND CSO INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
d n a l s I H e s u o
R A E L P
m a h n a M
w e
W Y A
7 6
7 8
o or B C ,G t s on L y l s A C LB dy B
AD ANDRA RO EX AL
2 1
0 1
2
3
1
t r u a Co e L 9 2 o2 5t 1 2
0 1
8 0 1 0 1 1
6 0 2
AD BO NHEUR RO
EK E W AY L W ARP
EY RO AD RL SHI
17
30
U SO O DR EL FI TH
E NS NU BA VE AAL ST
4 0 2
4 9 1
4 0 1 6 0 1
8 2
4 1
AD
0 9
e n i a l r Ve
Appendix 8 Page 1
e g d o aL i c a Ac
2
Tennis Courts Tennis
Games Court
3
Courts
4
TCBs
5
Ward Bdy
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
7.6m
N
E L A EV H T
7.9m
Bryant Court
LB
CEN
1 to 42
PC
CR
FOR INFORMATION
111
6 1 1
0 2 1
8.4m
B L
CR
THE VALE
A
2
Garage
VENTILATION COLUMN
FB
y r o g e r e G s u o H
Warehouse
b u S l E a t S
1 1
4 o1 4t
5 1
0 1
2 3
7 1
0 o1 5t
VENTILATION BUILDING
El Sub Sta
Y A DW E I L L A
0 2 o t 5 1
6
9 2
lmpress
House
Warehouse
8 2
5 o t 1
1 3
23
7.3m
D A O DR R O F D A R B
Warple Mews
8
o7 1t
s o i d u t nS u S
30
5 3
7 3
1 1
6 2
Posts
Warehouse
a t bS u LS E
32
0 2
6 1
9 5 1
6.1m
33
1 7 1
0 5 1
Overstone House
4 3
6 3
3 8 1
37
9 3
6.4m
1 to 19
40
Works
g n o L
1 to 11
9 1
4 2
13 to 22
o t
5 2
23 to 37
8 2
o 5t
7 2
Playground
3 4 24
6 0
9 3
4 8
5.8m
R OA D
1 to 72
Playing Fields
3 6
Court
41 to 84
Hall
2 8
3 2
10 m
t& s on
40 m
Tennis Court
SCALE 1 : 500
1 4
8 1
3 1
HA T F I E L D
1 3
3 1
RO A D
Mast
Revision History
Iss
6.1m
1
Description
Dsgnr
Chkd
Appd
Date
PC
AA
D ST GEO RGES ROA
FIRST ISSUE
CMUR
PSTV
JSWE
17/08/2011
A D
1 to 55
B Y
1 4
1 to 66
Station
Edison Court
El Sub Sta
1
4
0 4 1
2 4 1
2 6
6 4 1
8 4 1
168
4 6 1
2 6 1
1 7
D A O DR L O B B O C
2 7 1
4 8 1
7.0m
D A O DR L E I F H 7.6m T U O S
LB
49
A D
7.4m
57
59
Un d
6.7m
6 3 1 8 3 1
r e t l e h S
3 8
E l S u b
6m INTERCEPTION SHAFT
G R E E N E N D
d r o f g n o L t r u Co
A T S
S t a
S A LT C
5 0
9 6 2 o t 0 5 2
1 1
D
1 2
o4 1t
an d
3 2
9 3
St Peters Church
6 2
4 1
14
27
7 3
5 3
7 2
Vic
Parish Hall
AD STRAUSS RO
3 3
1 3
3 2
15
1 1
I LT O
1 2
a 1
A M
40
RO
32
5.8m
24
Drawing Title:
B o r o
2 0
22
16
8 8
KS HE AD
4 1
7 6 1 o t 3 4 1
o n s t , G
5 0 o2 9t 8 1
B R O O K F I E L DR O A D
5 9
HA W
A s l y
12
9
PLOTTED ON
14/11/2011
BY
LOCATION :
y r e g r u S
L B B d y
o n s t &
100-DL-PNC-S03EG-140003
AD
6 1
5 3
7.8m
A D
INTERCEPTION CHAMBER
t r u y Co e l r e v Be 2 8 o1 8t 6 1
Project Name:
7 4
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
r af t
5 2
9 2 o2 7t 0 2
3 1
9 2
1:500
A1
AA
5 0
4 3
3 3
71
83
8 5
8 7
91
r e t l e h S
6.1m
4 2 1 6 2 1
R O A D
9 4 2 o t 0 3 2
Security Reference:
Drawn By:
CONNECTION CULVERT
6 2
N/A
Project Group:
TQ2179
UBR
Sub Process:
APUR
n y l m E s n e d r a G
2 0 2
WASTE
1 0 0
on f i de nt i al
Sewage Pumping
Vandervell Court
1 5 0
2 0 0 mm
C
7 2
5.8m
H A T F I E L D
6 o1 2t 2
D A O MR A H N A C
0 7 1
6.1m
0 8 1
Y WA I T L MU
1 to 66
1 to 40
0 6 1
Tanks
Watt Court
D f e
2 5 1
El Sub Sta
6 3 4 1 3 1
6.7m
4 6 6 6
BS
d n U
1 to 38
Charles Court
Anthony
2 3 1
4 1 o t 0 1
6
4 3
CONNECTION CULVERT
3 2 1
5 o t 3
3 1
1 5
9 9 1
1 0 . 3 m
9 8 3 to 1 8 1
3 9 1
Wa r d B d y
9.6m
1 1 o t 1
7.9m
20m SHAFT
7.0m
7.9m
5
1 6 1
8.9m
9 6 1
7 to 11
3 4 1
8.5m
7 2 1
278
11
2
WS E KM R A XP E S S E
Cherry Court
7 4 1
3 1 1
1 4 1
9 5 1
7 7 1
9 7 1
1 8 1
TRE NU AVE E
Keyplan:
PO
RO AD DU CROS
S u r g e r y
DRAWING LOCATION
Larden Hall
7.2m
O AD EN R ARD L
5 0 2 o t 3 0 2
3 3
73
5 3
5 7
89
1 3 2
97
257
259
261
AY EW L RP WA
RD GA EY L AN ST
O AD M AN R EAST
R EG L VA E OV
1
5
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
4 1
S EN
3
THIS IS AN INDICATIVE WORKING DRAFT PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSIONS ONLY. ACCORDINGLY, THE DRAFT PLAN MUST NOT BE COPIED, DISTRIBUTED OR SHOWN TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THAMES WATER UTILITIES LIMITED. IT PROVIDES AN INDICATION OF SITES THAT, FOLLOWING DISCUSSIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS, MAY BE CONFIRMED AS BEING ON THE SHORTLIST OF CONSTRUCTION SITES FOR THE PROPOSED THAMES TUNNEL. INCLUSION OF A SITE ON THIS DRAFT PLAN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TO MEAN THAT SUCH SITE WILL BE SELECTED AS A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO FORM PART OF THE THAMES TUNNEL SCHEME.
6 3
8 1
R EG L VA E OV
7
5
6 2
e s u o h e r Wa
7 1
0 1
8 2
4 7 o t 8 5
LR EL NS MA D OA
7 2
N TM A EAS D RO A
9 2
1 2
6.4m
6 4
e t a t s kE r a nP o t Ac
7 3 a 7 3
4 3
4 2
o 6t 0 1
1 2 1
27
0 6
o t 35
5 3 1
D A O AR T T E L A V
6.1m
RD GA EY NL STA S EN
d n U
FW
37 o t 41
CW
F C
W F F C
0 5
W t n i o p t s e
D RO A EN ARD L
2 6
9 3
C
d n a l s I H e s u o
R A E L P
m a h n a M
w e
W Y A
7 6
7 8
o or B C ,G t s on L y l s A C LB dy B
AD ANDRA RO EX AL
2 1
0 1
2
3
1
t r u a Co e L 9 2 o2 5t 1 2
0 1
8 0 1 0 1 1
6 0 2
AD BO NHEUR RO
EK E W AY L W ARP
EY RO AD RL SHI
17
30
U SO O DR EL FI TH
E NS NU BA VE AAL ST
4 0 2
4 9 1
4 0 1 6 0 1
8 2
4 1
AD
0 9
e n i a l r Ve
6
DO NOT SCALE - IF IN DOUBT ASK
Status:
WORK IN PROGRESS
Keyplan:
N
10
3m
9m
107m (AOD + 100m)
20
MAPPING REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCE SURVEY ON BEHALF OF HMSO. ' CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORDNANCE SURVEY LICENCE NUMBER 100019345
RI
ES
ALL LEVELS ARE IN METRES AND RELATE TO A LOCAL HEIGHT DATUM WHICH IS 100 METRES BELOW ORDNANCE DATUM NEWLYN.
VARIBLE DEPENDING ON
2. POSITION OF COVERS ARE VARIABLE WITHIN 10m FROM THE EDGE OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE LOCATION IS BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT 3. CLADDING OF VENTILLATION BUILDING TO SUIT LOCATION AND AESTHETICS. 4. ALL TOP STRUCTURES TO HAVE:ACCESS STAIRS/LADDER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT HAND RAILING 5. ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
5000
REMOVABLE COVERS ARE SPLIT UP INTO SECTIONS AND SUPPORTED BY BEAMS, WHICH ARE ALSO REMOVABLE
50
00
15000
SCALE 1:100
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TOP STRUCTURE ABOVE MAIN AND INTERMEDIATE SHAFTS VENTILATION TOWER (SHAFTS)
- - 10000
- - - - - - AB DRAFT-SECOND ISSUE IL RS
Dsgnr
GT DS
Chkd
GT CH
Appd
27-11-09 - 22-05-09
Date
AA DRAFT-FIRST ISSUE
Iss Description
The Point, 7th Floor, 37 North Wharf Road, Paddington, London W2 1AF
Location Code: OS Reference: Security Reference: Drawn By:
N/A
Project Group:
---
UBR
Sub Process:
AP
LTTDT
Location / Town: Site Name:
3m DIA
Project Name:
THAMES TUNNEL
Contract Name:
SCALE 1:50
GENERIC ELEVATION AND TOP STRUCTURE FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE LAYOUT - SHAFT SITES
Drawing No.:
PLOTTED ON
04\12\09
BY
Andy.Purdy
LOCATION :
100-DH-GEN-00000-000002
NTS
A1
AB
100
150
200mm
Appendix 9 Page 1
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Access to river Comments River access is not essential as excavated material will be transported to a main site by road. Mitigation required and conclusions River access is not essential as excavated material will be transported to a main site by road. Access from site to TLRN restricted, as discussed above. No restrictions on TLRN. Creation of a rail siding at Barnes Bridge is possible. However, further investigation is required.
Access to rail
Use of rail is unlikely to be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced. Route to rail access point at Barnes Bridge uses the route to The Vale, then continues west along The Vale to Gunnersby Lane (A4000) before joining the North Circular (A406). The route then uses the A4 and the A316. The route then follows a narrow, traffic-calmed (speed humps) road, requiring the removal of speed humps for construction vehicle use. Creation of a siding by Barnes Bridge would require further investigation. Distance is 9.3km to rail access point from the site. Parking is potentially available on site. No parking available on Stanley Gardens as some of the spaces will require removal to enable access. which puts further demand on the remaining parking. PTAL 1-2 (low), as identified within Table 2.3.
Parking
PTAL least suitable. Public transport access issues for workforce. Workforce transport could be provided. Parking on Warple Way, Canham Road and Stanley Gardens requires removal.
Traffic management
To enable access parking on Warple Way, Canham Road and Stanley Gardens will require partial removal. A preliminary transport management plan is attached as Appendix 5.
Appendix 9 Page 2
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 9 Transport Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: The site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception site. Despite the access route being constrained, the site is only likely to generate a small amount of HGV movements. The use of rail may not be feasible due to the small quantities of excavated material produced by a reception site. Should the quantities be sufficient for rail transport, the potential for the construction of rail sidings at Barnes Bridge would require further investigation. In order to enable road access for construction vehicles, some parking will require removal on Warple Way, Canham Road and Stanley Gardens. Some localised widening at the western end of Canham Road may also be required. There is limited potential for the workforce to access the site by public transport, although some onsite parking would potentially be available.
Appendix 9 Page 3
Archaeology Site considerations Designations, including archaeological priority areas Summary of historical uses Comments No designations within the site boundary. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable.
During the late 1800s, the site was occupied by an orchard to the south and probable farm buildings located immediately to the north and west. In 1896, a NNW-SSE orientated street of terraced housing (Stanley Gardens) was established. The proposed shaft site is located where the buildings were located. These may have been cellared, the construction of which is likely to have disturbed any earlier remains. By 1910, a large factory had been built on the east side of Stanley Street, and to the west, a large factory labelled Motor Car Engineering Works. The site is currently occupied by car parking for a modern factory building. No archaeological receptors are recorded within the area of the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of high value being present.
A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development.
Potential receptors of very high or high value with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium value with the potential to be directly affected Other receptors with the potential to be directly affected
A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. A detailed desk-based assessment is required to assess development impacts.
No archaeological receptors are recorded within the area of the site. This does not preclude the possibility of unrecorded archaeological receptors of medium value being present within the site. The dewatering of adjacent waterlogged deposits is unlikely to be an issue, given the location of the site some distance from the Thames.
Not applicable.
Appendix 9 Page 4
Archaeology Site considerations Extent of existing disturbance (if known) Comments The construction of the existing factory buildings and former Victorian terracing and associated services is likely to have adversely impacted any in situ archaeological deposits. Mitigation required and conclusions A detailed desk-based assessment is required to sufficiently understand the archaeological resource and define risk to potential development. Mitigation methods could include: desk based assessment production of deposits model archaeological monitoring of geotechnical investigations archaeological evaluation archaeological watching brief archaeological excavation.
Potential issues
Detailed design proposals and an outline method statement will be required to enable initial assessment of development impacts, and to inform mitigation proposals. The information currently available indicates that, due to previous disturbance within the site, the archaeological risk is low. However, further desk-based assessment is required to determine this.
Summary: On the basis of the information currently available, the site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site as the archaeological risk is likely to be low to medium. No records of archaeological receptors within the site have been identified at this stage, and the site has been subjected to disturbance by modern development. Available geotechnical information suggests that deeply stratified deposits and waterlogged deposits are unlikely to be present. Further desk-based assessment would be required to confirm the above, should this site be progressed.
Appendix 9 Page 5
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Designations including conservation areas, including trees Comments Listed buildings There are no listed buildings within 250m. Locally listed buildings Although the London Borough of Ealing maintains a list of locally listed buildings, this data was not available at the time of this assessment. There are no locally listed buildings within 250m of the site and within the borough of Ealing. Conservation areas Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation area, 10m Bedford Park Conservation Area, 146m Registered historic parks and gardens There are no registered historic parks and gardens within 250m of the site. Locally listed parks and gardens There are no locally listed parks and gardens within 250m of the site. Protected views Information on protected views is not currently available for the boroughs of Hammersmith and Fulham, Hounslow or Ealing. Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions In the case of two conservation areas, a high-quality scheme design and/or adequate screening for the development will be required. A detailed desk-based assessment, in conjunction with archaeology work, may be required to inform likely development impact and to determine more detailed mitigation proposals.
Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be directly affected
Not applicable
Appendix 9 Page 6
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be directly affected Potential receptors of medium to very high importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Comments Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
There is potential for two conservation areas to experience an indirect impact on its setting as a result of the development.
There is no visual relationship between the site and the Bedford Park Conservation Area and, as such, no mitigation is required. There is potential for the setting of the Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation Area to be impacted by development. As such, adequate screening may be required to mitigate any negative visual impact on the area. Not applicable
Other receptors of lesser importance with the potential to be indirectly affected Sensitive landscape character areas likely to be affected, including trees and TPOs
Not applicable
Site is on part of Acton Park Industrial Estate and consists of warehouse-style industrial buildings, car parks and landscaped areas. The site fronts Stanley Gardens to the east, with semi-mature trees and shrubs lining the road. Buildings are separated from the road by car parking, opening up the streetscape of Stanley Gardens. The industrial estate encloses the site. Beyond the estate to the north is The Vale road and Acton Park area of open space. Residential areas are to the south of the industrial estate off Hatfield Road.
Retention of trees where possible and protection in accordance with BS 5837. Introduction of landscape scheme to include appropriate surface treatments and planting to relate to adjacent buildings of the industrial estate and street frontage. This site is suitable since its character is industrial in nature and relatively open. During construction, the potential loss of vegetation and estate buildings, and the presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings on site would impact the character of the site. The
Appendix 9 Page 7
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings would result in temporary, adverse direct impacts on the character of the site and temporary, adverse indirect impacts on neighbouring areas. Potential views likely to be affected Views into the site from Stanley Gardens and adjacent buildings on the industrial estate. The relatively open views through the estate show a mix of warehouse-style buildings, car parking and landscaped areas. The presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings would result in temporary, adverse direct impacts on the views of the site. Mitigation required and conclusions careful design of permanent elements could result in it being incorporated into the industrial estate.
During construction, use of hoardings and appropriate lighting to reduce visual intrusion. Design of permanent structures to be given careful consideration to integrate with industrial estate. Adequate new planting to screen permanent plant from Stanley Gardens in order to protect visual amenity. This site is suitable with appropriate mitigation. The structures should be of a high-quality design to ensure they do not detract from the character or appearance of the adjacent conservation areas, their setting, or views to and from them. Owing to the existing screening, it is unlikely that the Bedford Park Conservation Area will experience a significant impact on its setting. However, in the case of the Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation Area, there may be an indirect impact, in which case, adequate screening will be required to mitigate any negative impact on the setting of the area.
Particular considerations on sites where new permanent structures are required Potential issues
The indirect impact of permanent structures on the Bedford Park and Ravenscourt and Starch Green conservation areas will need to be carefully considered. There are two built heritage receptors within 250 metres of the development site. The Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation Area may experience an indirect impact from the scheme. There is the potential to mitigate any adverse impacts through screening and/or a high-quality scheme design.
Appendix 9 Page 8
Built heritage and townscape Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: This site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception site as the impact on built heritage receptors is likely to be minimal, and the industrial nature of the site means that it is judged to be of relatively low sensitivity. There are two receptors of medium importance (Bedford Park and Ravenscourt and Starch Green conservation areas) that may potentially be indirectly impacted on. Mitigation in the form of a high-quality scheme design, landscape design and screening would reduce any adverse impacts arising from the scheme. In terms of townscape impacts, the site is considered to be suitable as a main tunnel reception site as its existing character is industrial and open. During construction, the potential loss of vegetation and buildings, and the presence and operation of machinery, materials stores and buildings on site would impact on the character of the site and local views. Permanent elements are likely to be incorporated into the industrial estate and will only have a minimal impact.
Appendix 9 Page 9
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Hydrogeological conditions (groundwater) From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. Comments Geology (thickness) Superficial geology and made ground (2m) London Clay (44m) Lambeth Group (15m) Thanet Sand (9m) Hydrogeology Piezometric level in Chalk aquifer: ~ -32mAOD (~ 34mbgl) from EA Jan 08 water level contouring. Groundwater monitoring location EA hydrometry sites: No hydrometry site nearby. SPZs and groundwater users SPZ Not located in a source protection zone defined by EA. EA licensed groundwater abstractions and details No public water supply Five licensed abstraction boreholes within 2km radius. Licence numbers: 1. 28/39/39/0230 (3 boreholes) 2. 28/39/39/0197 (2 boreholes) Locations: 1. 1.1km northeast of the site 2. 1.7km southwest of the site A simple volumetric approach has been used to calculate the total capture zone of the abstraction borehole. A conservative mean annual recharge of 100mm/year was used to calculate a radius for licensed abstraction boreholes as follows: 1. 225m 2. 103m As a result, the shaft will not be located within either of these catchment areas. Mitigation required and conclusions The main tunnel reception shaft will be constructed to an invert level of approximately 25.8mbgl and therefore the shaft will be founded in the London Clay. Piezometric head(1) in the Chalk is approximately 8.2m below the base of the construction. Therefore, there is no potential issue in terms of geotechnical design.
Appendix 9 Page 10
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Comments Operator: 1. London & Quadrant Housing Trust 2. Chiswick Park Estate Management Ltd Abstracted aquifer unit: 1. Chalk 2. Gravel Abstraction purposes: 1. Industrial, commercial and public service (non-evaporative cooling, drinking, cooking, sanitary, washing) 2. Industrial, commercial and public service (business park spray irrigation, make-up or top-up water) Abstraction quantity (annual): 1. 63,500m3 2. 13,325m3 Local authorities (LA) unlicensed groundwater abstractions and details No abstraction borehole within 1 km radius. Ground source heat pump scheme One planning application for GSHP to 250m southeast of the site within 1 km radius. Borehole locations and depths There are no borehole records of historical water wells within a 1km radius. Not applicable. Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 11
Water resources hydrogeology and surface water Site considerations Potential impacts on surface water features Comments The site is located approximately 1.8km away from the Thames. There are roads and buildings between the site and the river so there is no direct overland pathway to the Thames. No impact on groundwater at depth is likely since the shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). At shallow depth, the shaft is located in Langley Silt, which is classified as unproductive strata, so no impact is expected. No mitigation required if groundwater is not impacted. Mitigation required and conclusions Work needs to be undertaken in consideration of Pollution Prevention Guidelines PPG1, PPG5 and PPS23.
Not applicable
No further issues.
No mitigation required.
Summary: In terms of hydrogeology, this site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception site because the shaft is to be constructed in London Clay (unproductive strata). No impact on the Chalk aquifer is expected. The superficial deposits at the site are Langley Silt, which is classified as unproductive strata at the site. Therefore, no impact is expected at shallow depth. In terms of surface water resources, this site is considered suitable as a main tunnel reception site because there is no direct pathway for pollution to the River Thames. However, standard mitigation would be required.
Appendix 9 Page 12
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Statutory designations Comments There are two local nature reserves (LNRs) within 2km of the site. These are: Wormwood Scrubs located 1.6km northwest at OS grid reference TQ 221 813. Gunnersbury Triangle located 1.85km southwest at OS grid reference TQ 201 786. There are two sites of importance for nature conservation within close proximity to the site. These are Southfields Recreation Ground Nature Area and Acton park Nature Conservation Area. These are located within 0.5km of the site. There are no BAP habitats within this site. However, the London BAP does note built structures as habitats of interest. The site may have the potential to support breeding birds and roosting bats within the existing buildings. Due to the lack of vegetative habitat, the breeding bird issue is largely reduced but species such as redstart may be present, depending on the condition of the buildings. Mitigation required and conclusions None required
None required
No specific guidance, however the London BAP recommends that developers think about biodiversity when constructing new structures by installing species-friendly features. If bat roosts were found to be present, mitigation would be required for any buildings to be affected by works, possibly including offsite provision. Careful placement of lighting to minimise illumination of surrounding habitat is likely to be required. If suitable breeding bird habitat is identified on the site, any clearance works would require a precheck by a suitably qualified ecologist within 24hours prior to clearance. No other issues
Potential issues
No other issues
Appendix 9 Page 13
Ecology (terrestrial and aquatic) Site considerations Comments Mitigation required and conclusions
Summary: This site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site and may require only basic ecological surveys if selected. Should notable or protected species be present, it is likely that some limited habitat mitigation or compensation would be required.
Appendix 9 Page 14
Flood risk assessment Site considerations Flood risk zone Comments Flood Zone 1 (greater than one in 1,000-year flood extent). Sewage transmission infrastructure is considered to be water compatible according to Table D.2 of PPS25. There is space on site for SUDS. However, existing buildings on site may cause issues with the use of SUDS. The superficial geology on site is silty clay and, as such, further investigation on site is required to assess the suitability for infiltration SUDS. No other issues Mitigation required and conclusions An FRA would be required to assess the residual risk of flooding to the site.
Not applicable.
Potential issues
No other issues
Summary: This site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site because although there may be constraints on SUDS due to space and suitability for infiltration, the site lies in Flood Zone 1 (greater than one in 1,000-year flood extent).
Appendix 9 Page 15
Air quality Site considerations AQMA Comments The air quality objective for NO2 is exceeded on major roads in the vicinity of the site. There are residential properties along the access route to/from the TLRN (A40) along Old Oak Road and The Vale (A4020). There are also residential properties on Warple Way. There are residential properties within 100m of the proposed site on The Vale. The main traffic issue in this area is exhaust emissions from vehicles along the A40 and A4020 corridors. See above Mitigation required and conclusions There is a need for more site specific data. There are relevant air quality sensitive receptors present along the route construction traffic is likely to take and close to the proposed construction works.
Sensitive receptors
Additional vehicle emissions have a low potential to interfere with local air quality action plan policies. See above
Existing sources of significant air pollutants Notable gaps in existing air quality monitoring Potential issues
There is no data available at the likely access to A40 and the nearest existing data indicates existing AQLV exceeded. The risk from additional exhaust emissions from construction HGVs is undefined at present. The risk from dust impacts is low.
Collect a minimum of 6 months diffusion tube data at site access to the A40 or other point of access to major road network. Minimise HGV movements on the local road network during the peak hour. Standard dust control measures will minimise the effect of fugitive dust on nearby sensitive receptors.
Summary: This site is suitable for use as a main tunnel reception site. There is a low potential for fugitive emissions of dust during construction to have a perceptible impact at residential receptors closest to the site. However, these impacts can be minimised with standard dust control measures. There is potential for HGV movements on the local road network to cause localised air quality impacts. However, this can be somewhat mitigated by minimising the movement of HGVs during peak hours.
Appendix 9 Page 16
Noise Site considerations Noise band level (from Defra noise maps) Comments Information from Defra noise maps indicates daytime noise levels of less than 58dB LAeq and night-time noise levels of less than 50dB LAeq at the rear facades of residential properties on The Vale (located to the north), Valetta Road (located to the east) and Hatfield Road (located to the south). Noise levels from the Defra noise maps provide an indication of prevailing noise levels only, and will not be employed in any detailed assessments for chosen sites. Mitigation required and conclusions Not applicable
Sensitive receptors
Sensitive receptors located on The Not applicable Vale to the northeast consist of four-storey buildings, with retail on the ground floor and residential dwellings above. These are located approximately 75m from the site boundary and 75m from the shaft location. Sensitive receptors to the east, on Warple Way/Valetta Road, consist of two- storey dwellings. These are located approximately 135m from the site boundary and 180m from the shaft location. Sensitive receptors to the south on Hatfield Road consist of two-storey residential properties. These are located approximately 135m from the site boundary and 190m from the shaft location. Between the proposed site location and the nearest receptors, there are existing properties which will provide some shielding from construction works. The proposed access route to the site is for vehicles to enter the site from The Vale down Warple Way, Canham Road and Stanley Gardens, and exit the site onto
Appendix 9 Page 17
Noise Site considerations Comments Stanley Gardens, onto The Vale. This route contains a number of noise-sensitive properties, and these receptors may be considerably affected by HGV traffic. Existing traffic issues Local road traffic, coupled with more distant road traffic on the A4020 to the north, will contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Not applicable Mitigation required and conclusions
Existing sources Local road traffic, coupled with more of significant noise distant road traffic on the A4020 to emissions the north, will contribute to the local noise climate in the area. Acton Park Industrial Estate is located to the west of the proposed site and may also contribute to the noise climate in the area of the site. A pumping station exists to the southeast, although no information with regard to this as a source of noise is currently available. Potential issues Construction: The construction period is estimated at six to seven years and working hours will be 12 hours a day (7am 7pm), Monday to Saturday. This has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts on the sensitive receptors surrounding the site; in particular, those located on the access route to the site. A relatively high number of daily HGV movements are anticipated, and this has the potential to result in adverse noise impacts to noise-sensitive properties located along the haul route. The site is relatively large and while the shaft location may be fixed, ancillary plant should be sited as far as is practicable from surrounding sensitive receptors. Proposed 3m site boundary fencing
Not applicable
Adherence to the good site practices provided in BS5228. Siting of noisy equipment and construction activities as far as is practicable from sensitive receptors. Provision of site boundary noise fences.
Appendix 9 Page 18
Noise Site considerations Comments will provide useful noise mitigation to some plant and construction activities. Vibration resulting from general construction works is not anticipated to result in an adverse impact. The nearest receptors to the proposed shaft location are at a distance of approximately 75m, and it is unlikely that vibration levels from shaft sinking will give rise to cosmetic building damage. However, vibration levels may cause annoyance. Vibration from tunnelling should be considered on a case-by-case basis at particular sensitive locations Operation: With appropriate attenuation (if necessary), there is no reason why noise from the ventilation column and top chamber should result in adverse noise impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Summary: This site is suitable as a main tunnel reception site. Although residential receptors are located close to the site, existing buildings should provide shielding from most construction works. However, the number of vehicles associated with the construction phase and their access routes (close to residential areas) has the potential to cause disturbance to properties lining those access routes. Mitigation required and conclusions
Appendix 9 Page 19
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 9 Site considerations Site location Current site use Topography Field evidence of contamination (ie, visual/olfactory) Current surrounding land use (immediately adjacent to site) Land quality Grid reference: 521019, 179940 The site is part of Acton Park Industrial Estate and comprises four industrial units. No site visit has been undertaken by a land quality specialist at this stage. No site visit has been undertaken by a land quality specialist at this stage.
Aerial images show: North: Acton Park Industrial Estate and beyond Acton Park. East: Warehouses and a works. South: Acton Park Industrial Estate and beyond residential properties. West: Acton Park Industrial Estate.
Geological and hydrogeological information Geological strata1 Superficial geology and made ground (2m) London Clay (44m) Lambeth Group (15m) Thanet Sand (9m)
Unproductive strata: London Clay Secondary Aquifer: River terrace deposits, Lambeth Group, Thanet Sand Principal Aquifer: Chalk River terrace deposits minor aquifer High leaching potential of soils (U)2
Groundwater vulnerability/Soil classification (High/Intermediate/ Low/Not applicable)2 Source protection zone details Surface water receptor
Relevant information within a 250m radius of the site Historical potentially contaminating activities On site Open land, 1862-1895 Residential properties (east site boundary), 1896-1976
Appendix 9 Page 20
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 9 Site considerations Land quality (based on mapping Motor car engineering works, 1909-1934 data) Engineering works, 1932-1972 Acton Park Industrial Estate, 1976-present Electrical substation, present Off site Store (15m east), 1947-1972 Soap works (15m east), 1932-1972 Engineering works (17m southeast), 1932-1947 Diesel engineering works (17m southeast), 1947-1972 Electrical substation (closest located 25m north), 1973 Engineering works (45m southeast), 1909-1920 Dyes and cleaning works (52m west) 19101960 Motor car repairing works and garage (56m east), 19091947 Motor coach works (63m east), 1932-1947 Automobile body and pressed steel works (65m east), 1947-1972 North and southwest junction of the Hammersmith branch railway (95m southeast), 1868-1967 Corrugated paper works (140m southeast), 1909-1920 Printing works (180m west), 1947-1972 Carriage factory (195m east), 1909-1920 Sewage disposal works/pumping station (205m southeast), 1896-present Electrical engineering works (235m southeast), 19471972 Pollution incidents to controlled waters Landfill sites Other waste sites Registered radioactive substances Fuel stations/depots Contemporary trade directory entries None
One fuel station Total, open (75m northwest) Ten Confectionary manufacturers, active (on site)
Appendix 9 Page 21
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 9 Site considerations Land quality Lithographic plate makers, inactive (20m east) T shirt manufacturers, inactive (24m east) Television and video manufacturers and wholesalers, inactive (31m north) Scientific apparatus and instrument manufacture, active (34m west) Engineers general, inactive (34m west) Commercial cleaning services, inactive (44m northwest) Cleaning services domestic, inactive (44m northwest) Leisure and sportswear manufacture and wholesalers, inactive (44m northwest) Mortar manufacturers, inactive (59m east) Site classification based on above information Activity Potential site contaminants derived from surface sources (eg, contaminants in made ground) 1) Some potential for made ground from potential filling operations during development 2) Motor engineering works 3) Engineering works 4) Industrial estate 5) Electrical substation Potential site 1) Soap works contaminants derived from offsite 2) Diesel sources and engineering works transported to site 3) Engineering works Distance and direction to site 1) On site and directly adjacent to site 2) On site and directly adjacent to site 3) On site and directly adjacent to site 4) On site and directly adjacent to site 5) On site 1) 15m east 2) 17m east 3) 17m east 2) Metals, TPH, PAHs 3) Metals, TPH, PAHs 1) Metals, TPH, PAHs Contaminants 1) Metals, TPH, PAHs 2) Metals, TPH, PAHs 3) Metals, TPH, PAHs 4) Metals, TPH, PAHs 5) PCBs
Appendix 9 Page 22
Site suitability report S03EG Appendix 9 Site considerations Potential contamination pathways to site (Conceptual Site Model)3 Contamination category Land quality Source 1: A1, A2, A3, B4 Source 2: E1, F7 Category 3 assessed as high risk
Summary: The site is less suitable as a main tunnel reception site, based on the high potential for contamination to have occurred from the onsite engineering works and industrial estate, and from offsite activities to have impacted shallow groundwater which may have migrated beneath the site. The identified sources of contamination may impact onsite workers and adjacent human receptors through direct contact/vapour inhalation exposure pathways. Notes: 1. From BGS Geological Model, giving average ground condition profile. Local near surface conditions may vary, particularly within the river. 2. Soil information for urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere in the country. Therefore, a worst case vulnerability (H) is assumed until proven otherwise. 3. Refer to schematic Conceptual Site Model for explanation of site-specific source-pathway-receptors.
Appendix 9 Page 23
Contacts
For information about the Thames Tideway Tunnel Call: 0800 0721 086 Lines are open 24 hours a day Visit: www.thamestidewaytunnel.co.uk Email: [email protected] For our language interpretation service call 0800 0721 086