Everton Dane Henry, A089 425 229 (BIA March 18, 2011)

Ezra, Eran Ben, Esq.
Law Ofice of Eran Ben Ezra, P.A.

561 N.E. 79th Street, Suite 205
Miami, FL 33138-0000
Name: HENRY, EVERTON DANE
U.S. Department of Justice
Executive Ofce fr Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Appeals
Ofce of the Clerk
5107 leesbur Pike. Suite 2000
Fals Church. Virinia 22041
OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel MIA
333 South Miami Ave., Suite 200
Miami, FL 33130
A089-425-229
Date of this notice: 3/18/2011
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-refrenced case.
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Cole, Patricia A.
Greer, Anne J.
Pauley, Roger
Sincerely,
Donna Car
Chief Clerk
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Everton Dane Henry, A089 425 229 (BIA March 18, 2011)
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
W-
U.S. Department of Justice Decision of the Board of Imigation Appeals
Executive Ofce fr Imigation Review
Falls Church, Virginia 22041
File: A089 425 229 - Miami, FL
In re: EVERTON DANE HENRY
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
APPEAL
Date:
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Eran Ben Eza, Esquire
ON BEHALF OF DHS:
CHARGE:
Paulette R. Taylor
Assistant Chief Counsel
MAR 1 8 2011
Notice: Sec. 237(a)(l )(B), I&N Act [8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(l)(B)] -
In the United States in violation of law
APPLICATION: Adjustment of Status
The respondent appeals fom the Immigration Judge's November 17, 2009, decision
pretermitting his application fr adjustment of status under section 245(a) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1255(a). The Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") opposes the
appeal. The record will be remanded fr frther proceedings.
We review the Immigration Judge's fndings of fct, including adverse credibilit
determinations, fr clear error. 8 C.F.R. 1003. l (d)(3)(i). All other issues, including whether
the parties have met the relevant burden of proof, and issues of discretion, we review de novo.
8 C.F.R. 1003. l (d)(3)(ii).
The Immigration Judge fund the respondent was admited as a "crewman," as defned in
section lOl(a)(lO) of theAct, 8 U.S.C. l lOl(a)(lO), and therefre, he was ineligible fr adjustment
of status pursuant to 245(c)(l) of the Act. (l.J. at 3). We have held that in determining whether an
alien was admitted as a crewman, the alien's visa, as well as the circumstances surounding his entry
into the United States, should be examined. See Matter ofG-D-M-, 25 l&N Dec. 82, 85 (BIA 2009);
Matter o/Tzimas, 10 l&N Dec. 101 (BIA 1962). In making her determination that the respondent
was admited as a crewman, the Immigration Judge properly examined the respondent's visa
(l.J. at 3). However, despite the fct that the respondent, though counsel, indicated that it was not
his intent to enter the United States as a crewman, the Immigration Judge did not question the
respondent about his intent (Tr. at 13 ). See Respondent's Addendum to Pretrial Legal Memorandum
fled on October 29, 2009 at 3. Because the circumstances surounding the respondent's admission
T O 5 9,,,%W@ u F iW^
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
:-^~= ? x
A089 425 229
-
were not flly exrined, we will remand the record fr fher proceedings, and the entry of a new
decision.
On remand, the Immigration Judge shall conduct a new hearing to consider the circwstances
surounding the respondent's enty to detenine whether the respondent entered the United States
to work as a crewman. The paries are fee to submit additional evidence, including testimony,
regarding the respondent's eligibility fr relief. Accordingly, the fllowing order will be entered.
ORDER: The record is remanded fr frther proceedings consistent with this opinion, and
fr entry of a new decision.
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
(i
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMIGRATION REVIEW
IMMIGRATION COURT
Miami, Florida
File A 089 425 229 November 17, 2009
In the Matter of
EVERTON DANE HENRY, IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
Respondent
CHARGE: Section 237 (a) (1) (B) non-imigrant remained longer
than permitted.
APPLICATIONS: Adjustment of status pursuant to Section 245 of
the Imigration and Nationality Act and, in the
alternative, voluntary departure pursuant to
Section 2408 (b).
ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT:
Kenneth Panzer, Esquire
ON BEHALF OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF HOMELAND SECURITY:
Paulette Taylor, Esquire
ORAL DECISION OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE
The respondent is a native and citizen of the country
of Jamaica who was last admitted to the United States at Miami
International Airport on August 3, 2002 as an alien in transit or
a C-1. He sometime after that was placed into removal
proceedings by the Department of Homeland Security.
There is one removal charge referenced on the Notice to
Appear. That charge in this case has been established via clear
and convincing evidence via the pleading process. The Notice to
Appear was clearly issued and served more than one calendar year
after the respondent's last arrival and admission into the Uni/
States. So _therefore, that means he i eligiblto apply for
,v15ot17
voluntary departure in the alternativto Section 240B(b), which
w,T ,.:
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
.
indeed he has done and which will be the concluding portion of

this instant decision.
The record is also clear that the respondent is the
beneficiary of an approved I-130 visa petition as the spouse of a
United States citizen. That would make an immigrant visa
imediately available to him. And since he was inspected and
aditted to the United States at Miami International Airport,
then_ therefore, the respondent would be, certainly, ma ie
eligible to apply for adjustment of status pursuant to Section
245 of the statute. We do have all the docuentation in the
record regarding that application.
There is some evidence in this case that the respondent
may have been arrested at some time for some criminal charges,
but the record is also clear that those charges were ultimately
not pursued by the authorities of the state of Florida and,
therefore, he is not inadmissible to the United States on any
proscribed ground found at Section 212 (a) of the statute.
Since this case has been before the undersigned, the
Board of Imigration Appeal/ with regard to the ability of an /
alien to seek cancellation of removal under 240A (b) of the
statute, has issued the precedent decision of Matter of G-D-M, 25
I&N 82 (BIA 2009). In that particular case, the BIA found that
an alien who had actually never even been technically admitted to
the United States as a crewman, but who was coming to the United
II
II
States to join the ship, met the definition of crewman found at
A 089 425 229 2 November 17, 2009
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Section lOl(a) (10) of the Inigration and Nationality Act. That

was not expressly discussed in the decision, but the BIA found
that)pursuant Section 240A(c) of the statute, the /
applicant for cellation in that case was not eligible because
)
even though the applicant had actually never arrived in the
United States on a vessel or
alien was actually employed,
aircraft upon which or in which the
tha_nonetheless_the alien was a
crewman, and therefore, subject to the bar.
Despite the undersigned's, perhaps, lack of agreement
with this decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals, it is
binding authority. It is a very sweeping decision, as a matter
of fact, because
)
unlike the present case_where the respondent
previously had been in the United States and had worked as a
crewman, an despite the fact that as he told us today in his
testimony, the only visa that he was ever in possession of was in
fact a C-1 or alien in transit/D crewman visa at the time that he
arrived and was admitted at Miami International Airport. The
Court still finds that the broad language contained in Matter of
G-D-M indicates that the proper course here will be to follow the
BIA precedent and to find that the respondent is ineligible for
adjustment of status under 245(c) since the
contained in Matter of G-D-M indicates that
admitted to the United States_ albeit at the
capacity as a crewman. Therefore, he would
sweeping languag
he was
1
indeed
I

airport_ in his
not be eligible for
adjustment of status. The Court's decision here then will be to
A 089 425 229 3 November 17, 2009
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
-he /.
pretermit adjustment of status and to_ therefore )deny it.
The respondent, however, certainly is eligible for
voluntary departure in the alternative.
be to grant him voluntary departure
My decision herein will/
until December 17, 2009.
That will coincide with the date of the submission of the appeal
of the remaining portion of the Court's decision. It will also
be premised upon the posting of the required voluntary departure
bond before close of business on November 24, 2009, which is five
working days from today's date. Should respondent fail to file
an appeal of my decision and should he fail to post the $500
bond, then my order will revert_ thereafter} to a removal order to

the Court-designated country of Jamaica.
The removal charge in this case has been established.
There is no presentation that the respondent is eligible for any
other form of relief from removal. And)based on the foregoing,
the following order of the Court will be entered.
ORDERS
The application for adjustment status pursuant to
Section 245 of the statute is hereby pretermitted and therefore,
DENIED.
The respondent is granted
December 17 of 2009.
A 089 425 229 4
Imigrat'on Judge
Miami, lorida
November 17, 2009
November 17, 2009
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
CERTIFICATE PAGE
I hereby certify that the attached proceeding
before NANCY R. MCCORMACK in the matter of:
EVERTON DANE HENRY
A 089 425 229
Miami, Florida
was held as herein appears, and that this is the original
transcript thereof for the file of the Executive Office for
Imigration Review.
(Transcriber)
Deposition Services, Inc.
6245 Executive Boulevard
Rockville, Maryland 20852
(301) 881-3344
January 10, 2010
(Completion Date)
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t

Everton Dane Henry, A089 425 229 (BIA March 18, 2011)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Everton Dane Henry, A089 425 229 (BIA March 18, 2011)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Everton Dane Henry, A089 425 229 (BIA March 18, 2011)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ezra, Eran Ben, Esq.

Law Ofice of Eran Ben Ezra, P.A.

indeed he has done and which will be the concluding portion of

Section lOl(a) (10) of the Inigration and Nationality Act. That

bond, then my order will revert_ thereafter} to a removal order to

You might also like