A Discrete Model For Resonance Near Embedded Bound States: Volume 2, Number 6, December 2010
A Discrete Model For Resonance Near Embedded Bound States: Volume 2, Number 6, December 2010
1
2
t
mn
3U
2
mn
U
mn
U
m1.n
U
m1.n
U
m^ n
!
(2)
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 913
in which t
mn
1 if m 0, t
mn
1 1
n
j if m 6 0, and
^
n 1 n for n 0. 1. This results in the
system of ordinary differential equations
M
n
U
0n
4U
0n
U
1n
U
1n
U
0^ n
(3)
U
mn
1
n
j 4
U
mn
U
m1.n
U
m1.n
U
m^ n
. for m 6 0. (4)
The assumption of a harmonic solution U
mn
t u
mn
e
i .t
with . 9 0 leads to the equations
M
n
.
2
4u
0n
u
1n
u
1n
u
0^ n
0 (5)
.
2
1
n
j 4
u
mn
u
m1.n
u
m1.n
u
m^ n
0. for m 6 0. (6)
The table below identifies the correspondence of parameters and physical objects between the
slab system and the discrete model.
dielectric slab system discrete model
ambient space air uniform lattice at m 6 0
periodic slab scatterer of plane waves the scatterer : anomalous masses
M
0
and M
1
at m 0
frequency . frequency .
wave number i parallel to the slab tension of the strings in the ambient
equivalently. angle of incidence lattice t 1 j
structural symmetry about a plane
perpendicular to the slab
equal masses of the scatterer M
0
M
1
q
^ n
q
n
!
r 1 0 (7)
for n 0. 1. We must find ratios q
0
,q
1
and numbers r that satisfy this equation for both n 0 and
n 1. Thus, we require
.
2
4 j
q
1
q
0
.
2
4 j
q
0
q
1
Fig. 1. Lattice model for resonant interaction between extended states and trapped modes at
frequencies embedded in the continuum. The scatterer that supports the trapped modes consists of the
two beads at m 0 whose masses (which are denoted by M
0
and M
1
) differ from those of rest of the
lattice. Asymmetry in the lattice is imposed by changing the upper and lower tensions by j for m 6 0,
and asymmetry in the scatterer is imposed by taking M
0
6 M
1
.
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 914
which yields either
q
0
q
1
q
p
0
q
p
1
j
1 j
2
p
or
q
0
q
1
q
e
0
q
e
1
j
1 j
2
p
where the superscripts p and e are used in anticipation of the propagating and evanescent nature of
the harmonics for the particular frequency interval that we will choose to work with (9), shown below.
Using these ratios in (7), we find that r satisfies
r
2
br 1 0 (8)
where b is one of the two numbers
b
p
4 .
2
1 j
2
p
. b
e
4 .
2
1 j
2
p
.
The solutions of (8) are reciprocal to each other, that is, they are equal to r
p
1
or r
e
1
,
where
r
p
1
2
b
p
b
p
2
4
q
!
. r
e
1
2
b
e
b
e
2
4
q
!
.
One finds that, as long as the inequalities
1 j
2
p
G .
2
2 G
1 j
2
p
(9)
hold, r
p
has unit modulus, and r
e
is real and greater than 1. We can thus define 0 G 0 G and
c 9 0 so that
r
p
e
i 0
. r
e
e
c
. (10)
The general solution of (6) in the uniform lattice (all masses equal to 1) is a combination of
separable solutions
u
mn
q
p
n
c
p
1
e
i 0m
c
p
2
e
i 0m
q
e
n
c
e
1
e
cm
c
e
2
e
cm
. (11)
When multiplied by e
i .t
, the first two terms represent waves traveling to the right and left, and the
last two represent exponentially growing and decaying solutions.
In the symmetric case j 0, the ratios
q
p
0
,q
p
1
1. q
e
0
,q
e
1
1
indicate that, in a propagating harmonic, the two rows of beads are displaced by identical amounts,
whereas in an evanescent harmonic, the two rows are displaced by the same magnitude but in
opposite directions.
The entire continuous spectrum (spectral band) for the uniform lattice system consists of those
frequencies for which at least one of the two values of r in (8) is unitary (a complex number with unit
modulus). For j 0, for example, one of the values of r is unitary when 1 .
2
5, and the other is
unitary when 3 .
2
7, and thus, the spectral band is 1 .
2
7. The angle of the values of r is
graphed in Fig. 2; this is the dispersion relation for the uniform lattice. It is bivalued in the interval
3 .
2
5, and there are two intervals, i.e., 1 .
2
G 3 and 5 G .
2
7, for which there is exactly
one propagating harmonic. The interval (9) for j 0 is precisely 1 G .
2
G 3.
Scattering. When an obstacle is introduced into the lattice by the modification of the masses at
m 0, a right-traveling wave I
p
q
p
n
e
i 0m
of amplitude jI
p
j is scattered by the obstacle, producing a
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 915
reflected wave A
p
q
p
n
e
i 0m
to the left and a transmitted wave B
p
q
p
n
e
i 0m
to the right. In addition,
evanescent harmonics emerge in the vicinity of the obstacle
u
mn
I
p
q
p
n
e
i 0m
A
p
q
p
n
e
i 0m
A
e
q
e
n
e
cm
. m 0,
B
p
q
p
n
e
i 0m
B
e
q
e
n
e
cm
. m ! 0.
&
(12)
The coefficients A
p
, A
e
, B
p
, and B
e
are determined by the equality of the two expressions in (12) at
m 0 and n 0. 1, which yields
I
p
A
p
B
p
. A
e
B
e
(13)
and (5) for m 0 and n 0. 1. By eliminating A
p
and A
e
by (13), one arrives at a 2 2 system for
B
p
and B
e
B
p
q
p
n
M
n
.
2
4 2e
i 0
q
p
^ n
B
e
q
e
n
M
n
.
2
4 2e
c
q
e
^ n
2i I
p
q
p
n
sin0 n0. 1. (14)
One can calculate the energy conservation relation jA
p
j
2
jB
p
j
2
jI
p
j
2
, and the transmission
coefficient is equal to
T jB
p
j
2
,jI
p
j
2
. (15)
Trapped modes. A trapped mode of the lattice with the scatterer at m 0 is a nonzero field u
mn
in the absence of an incident source field. This means that the system (14) has a nonzero solution
for B
p
. B
e
with I
p
0. Because jA
p
j
2
jB
p
j
2
jI
p
j
2
, we have B
p
A
p
0, and the field is
necessarily exponentially decaying as m !1, that is
u
mn
B
e
q
e
n
e
cjmj
trapped mode.
Thus, the condition for a guided mode is the vanishing of the coefficients of B
e
in (14) for n 0. 1
q
e
0
M
0
.
2
4 2e
c
q
e
1
0. q
e
1
M
1
.
2
4 2e
c
q
e
0
0.
For given masses M
0
and M
1
, we now solve for j and ., obtaining an isolated pair j
0
. .
0
that
corresponds to a trapped mode. As M
0
and M
1
are varied, the value j
0
that admits a trapped-mode
frequency .
0
changes. (This is analogous to the change of the Bloch wavenumber i
0
of the guided
mode for the dielectric slab when one perturbs the structure.) The eigenfrequency .
0
is embedded
Fig. 2. Dispersion relation for the uniform lattice when j 0. The graphs of 0 arccos3 .
2
,2 and
0 arccos5 .
2
,2 give 0 in the propagating harmonic q
n
e
i 0m
as a function of .
2
. The spectral
band is the interval 1 .
2
7, in which there exists at least one such value of 0. In the intervals
1 .
2
G 3 and 5 G .
2
7, there is exactly one propagating harmonic, and therefore, it is possible that
the system with the scatterer, for suitable values of M
0
and M
1
, support a trapped mode built only from
the evanescent harmonic that decays exponentially as jmj !1. When M
0
. M
1
2. 2 and j 0,
such a mode exists at .
2
21,10, as indicated by the diamond. This frequency is embedded in the
continuous spectrum.
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 916
in the continuous spectrum for the lattice system. Using the relation q
e
0
,q
e
1
j
1 j
2
p
, the
explicit solution for the masses in terms of j
0
and .
0
is
M
0
1
.
2
0
4 2e
c
0
1 j
2
p
j
0
h i
. M
1
1
.
2
0
4 2e
c
0
1 j
2
p
j
0
h i
(16)
in which c
0
is c with j. . replaced by j
0
. .
0
. This leads to the simple relation
M
0
M
1
2j
0
.
2
0
.
This shows that symmetric structures M
0
M
1
admit a trapped mode when j
0
0, that is, when the
tensions of the ambient lattice are also symmetric. When M
0
M
1
2, the frequency of the trapped
mode is .
21,10
p
:
M
0
. M
1
2. 2 $j
0
. .
0
0.
21,10
p
.
This frequency is indicated in Fig. 2.
Transmission anomalies. Let us consider a one-parameter family of scatterers by fixing
M
0
M
1
4
so that the scatterer is determined by one number M
0
and that the difference M
0
2 measures its
asymmetry. Given M
0
, the trapped-mode parameters j
0
. .
0
are then determined implicitly by (16);
their graphs are shown in Fig. 3. The asymmetry of the scatterer M
0
6 2 coincides with the
nonvanishing of j
0
.
More specifically, the graphs in Fig. 3 should be interpreted as follows. Fixing a value of M
0
specifies a scatterer. Then for this scatterer, these graphs identify an isolated pair j
0
. .
0
in j. .-
space for which the system supports a trapped mode. The value of .
0
is always within the lower
part of the spectral band for which the lattice characterized by j
0
supports one propagating and one
evanescent harmonic (shown in Fig. 2 for j 0). When j is perturbed from j
0
, the system for this
fixed M
0
and the new j no longer supports a guided mode at any frequency near .
0
.
This destruction of a guided mode due to a perturbation of j is the cause of resonant scattering
fields and, hence, transmission anomalies near the frequency .
0
. More specifically, for small
enough perturbation of j from j
0
, a small interval about .
0
remains in the spectral band but no
Fig. 3. First two graphs give the values of the asymmetry j
0
in the ambient lattice and the frequency .
0
corresponding to a trapped mode, as functions of the mass M
0
, subject to M
0
M
1
4. The frequency
interval shown in the second graph is within the spectral band for all the values of j shown in the first
graph; thus, all of the trapped mode frequencies are embedded in the continuum. The third graph
emphasizes that for each M
0
, there is an isolated point j
0
. .
0
in j. .-space for which the discrete
system supports a trapped mode. Resonance occurs when j is perturbed from j
0
. The significance of
these graphs is explicated in the subsection on Btransmission anomalies[ in Section 2.
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 917
longer contains an eigenvalue of a bound state. In this interval, scattering fields exhibit high
resonant amplitude enhancement and are associated with what are variably called guided
resonances [2], or leaky, quasi-guided [13], or resonant modes. Thus the anomalous transmission
that we investigate here is due to the annihilation of a nonrobust bound state that turns into
resonance within the spectral band of the system and not to the movement of a resonant state
into or out of the band.
For a fixed choice of M
0
, the transmission coefficient T exhibits anomalous behavior at values of
j. . near the trapped-mode pair j
0
. .
0
, as seen in Fig. 4. In the symmetric case, M
0
M
1
2,
the anomaly as a function of . remains centered about .
0
for values of j near j
0
0. In the
asymmetric case, the trapped mode occurs at j
0
6 0, and as j is perturbed from j
0
, the center of
the anomaly shifts away from .
0
. The detuned resonant frequency .
.
0
1
~ j
1
2
r
2
t
2
~ j
2
.
The significance of the coefficients will be made clear in the next section.
For a periodic slab, j is replaced by a wavenumber i parallel to the slab and M
0
2 is replaced
by a structural parameter p. The slab system should operate in a regime of a single propagating
diffraction order. Near p. i
0
0. 0, the first graph in Fig. 3 would be like i
0
/
p
p
, rather than
linear as in the discrete system, because guided modes must come in i
0
pairs.
3. Universal Formulae
The transmission anomalies exhibited by our discrete system as well as the air/slab system are
described by the formula derived in [8] and [11] for scattering by continuous or discrete periodic
slabs or waveguides in contact with an ambient medium. In this discussion, we use the notation
Fig. 4. Resonant anomalies in the transmitted energy T (15) near trapped mode parameters j
0
. .
0
of the
discrete model, as functions of ., for various values of the asymmetry j in the ambient lattice and M
0
in the
scatterer, subject to M
0
M
1
4. The parameters j
0
. .
0
of the trapped mode depend on M
0
according
to the graphs in Fig. 3. In each panel, ~ j j j
0
assumes the values 0 (no spike, black), 0.1 (solid line,
yellow/green), 0.2 (long-dashed, orange/blue), 0.3 (short-dashed, red/violet). (a) M
0
2.0,
j
0
. .
0
0. 1.449; (b) M
0
2.1, j
0
. .
0
0.211. 1.453; (c) M
0
2.2, j
0
. .
0
0.430. 1.467;
(d) M
0
2.3, j
0
. .
0
0.665. 1.488.
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 918
of the discrete system, remembering that j is analogous to a Bloch wavenumber i along the
dielectric slab.
The formula gives the general form of the transmission anomaly for j. . close to j
0
. .
0
:
T j. .
1
1 D
2
O j~ jj ~ .
2
. D
r
0
j ~ .
1
~ j r
2
~ j
2
j
t
0
j ~ .
1
~ j t
2
~ j
2
j
1 ~ . (17)
in which ~ . . .
0
, and ~ j j j
0
. A proof of the error estimate is given in [9]. Fig. 5 shows the
approximation 1,1 D
2
for different values of the real number
1
T j. .%
t
2
0
j ~ .
1
~ jt
2
~ j
2
j
2
t
2
0
j ~ .
1
~ jt
2
~ j
2
j
2
r
2
0
j ~ .
1
~ jr
2
~ j
2
j
2
1 ~ .
2
. (18)
The formula is rigorous and very general; its derivation relies on a small number of conditions that
are satisfied for a large class of lossless linear scattering problems, whether classical or quantum or
whether continuous or discrete. It is based on perturbation analysis of a simple branch of the
complex relation
. Wj .
0
1
~ j
2
~ j
2
(19)
defining the locus of generalized trapped modes, which correspond to true trapped modes when j
and . are both real and are associated with leaky modes when either one of them is not real. (For a
dielectric slab, one makes the substitution j7!i, and . Wi is the dispersion relation for
generalized guided modes.) The conditions on which the formula rely are
1) .
0
Wj
0
for an isolated point j
0
. .
0
in the real j. .-plane;
2) conservation of energy;
3) for real j, Imj 0.
Fig. 5. Analytic formula (17) for transmission anomalies. T is plotted against ~ . . .
0
for various
values of ~ j ~ j ~ j
0
and
1
, where an embedded bound state occurs at i
0
. .
0
. The parameter
1
controls how the detuning of the resonant anomaly depends on ~ j [see (20)]. In each panel, t
0
0.6,
t
2
1.5, r
2
1.0, 10, and ~ j assumes the values 0 (no spike, black); 0.01 (solid line, yellow/
green); 0.02 (long-dashed, orange/blue); 0.03 (short-dashed, red/violet). (a)
1
0 (symmetric in ~ j);
(b)
1
0.1; (c)
1
0.2; (d)
1
0.3.
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 919
The first condition holds generically for j. . regimes in which the uniform lattice supports one
propagating and one evanescent harmonic. The third amounts to the fact that the poles of the
scattering matrix are located in the lower half of the complex plane and implies that
1
is real and
Im
2
0.
In (17), r
0
and t
0
are real and positive and satisfy r
2
0
t
2
0
1. They are equal to the relative
reflected and transmitted energies at ~ j. ~ . 0. 0. Given that
1
, r
2
, and t
2
are real valued, which
is the case for our discrete model and the dielectric slab in [11], the relation ~ .
1
~ j r
2
~ j
2
0
describes, up to quadratic order in ~ j, the locus of 100% transmission, which coincides with the
peaks in the transmission graphs. The relation ~ .
1
~ j t
2
~ j
2
0 describes the locus of 0%
transmission, which corresponds to the dips of the transmission graphs. The number
1
, which is
the linear coefficient of both of these relations as well as the relation (19), is responsible for shifting
the anomaly away from .
0
as j deviates from j
0
. The positions of the peak and dip differ only by the
quadratic expression r
2
t
2
~ j
2
; thus, the width of the anomaly is quadratic in ~ j. The center of the
anomaly can be defined (up to quadratic order in ~ j) by the detuned resonant frequency
.
.
0
1
~ j
1
2
r
2
t
2
~ j
2
. (20)
The number controls the slope of the transmission for ~ j 0, which is the overall slope of the graph
across the resonances.
The utility of (17) is that one needs only to determine a small number of coefficients in order to
obtain a formula that is accurate to Oj~ jj ~ .
2
. It is possible to increase the accuracy by including
higher order terms in j in the factors in absolute values in D and higher order terms in both j and .
in the term 1 ~ ..
For a symmetric structure, for which j
0
0, we have
1
0. This is because, by the change
j7!j and switching of the indices n 0 and n 1 in the field, one obtains another admissible
field with the same transmission coefficient, and thus, T is symmetric in ~ j. In this case, there is no
linear detuning of the resonant frequency. When the symmetry of the structure is broken, the
symmetry of the fields is also broken, and this results in a transmission coefficient that is generally
asymmetric in ~ j and has
1
6 0. This asymmetry is manifest in a detuning of the resonant frequency
from .
0
to .
r
0
t
0
. (21)
The complex number
2
is the coefficient of the quadratic term in the relation . .
0
1
~ j
2
~ j
2
(19). Thus, (21) is a form of the Fermi golden rule, relating the imaginary part of the complex
frequency of a leaky mode to the width of the anomaly.
4. Nonlinear Scatterer
The effects of Kerr nonlinearity on resonance in dielectric slabs [24], [25], as well as waveguides
[26], [27], is important for applications exploiting tunable bistability. In our discrete model, Kerr
nonlinearity is introduced into the scatterer by including a fourth-power self-interaction term `jU
0n
j
4
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 920
in the Hamiltonian (2). In the Anderson model, an analogous term leads to bistable resonant
transmission, which emerges near the bound-state frequency of the linear system and depends on
the intensity I of the incident field and the strength ` of the nonlinearity [28]. There, the steady states
at a given frequency are determined by the real roots of a cubic polynomial with coefficients
depending on I and `. For the model presented in the present paper, it turns out that the steady
states are determined by the simultaneous real roots of four cubic equations in four real variables.
Numerical calculations have shown up to five independent states at the same frequency that exhibit
resonant behavior for small I or ` not only near but extending to a continuum of frequencies far
above (but not below) the single guided mode frequency (see Fig. 6).
Similar investigations have been carried out by McGurn et al., [29][31] for transmission through
nonlinear barriers in photonic crystal waveguides, using a discrete model consisting of 1-D
difference equations. Extreme values of the transmission coefficient, depending on the Kerr
parameter, occur at the frequencies that correspond to various types of resonant fields in the
barrier. In our model, there are multiple harmonic solutions and resonant amplitude enhancement
not only at frequencies near that of the bound state but also at a continuum of frequencies ranging
from that of the guided mode up to the upper end of the interval that supports exactly one
propagating harmonic. This seems to be connected to the fact that the discrete system has two
rows of beads instead of one. Further investigation will be required to discover an explanation of this
phenomenon and to inquire whether a nonlinear periodic dielectric slab system also exhibits this
sort of behavior.
5. Concluding Discussion
The connection established between the line shape of resonant transmission across a scatterer in
our discrete model and asymmetry of the structure and the field offers a means of investigating
dynamic control of the central frequency and width of resonances through the perturbation of
system parameters.
This connection is embodied in an analytic formula in which a parameter in the ambient space, a
parameter associated with structural asymmetry and detuning, and the frequencies of the peak and
dip, appear explicitly. For a real system, as a dielectric slab structure, a direct correspondence
between the parameters in the formula and those of the structure would be established through
numerical computations or laboratory experiments. Even so, it is desirable to have a deeper analytic
understanding of this correspondence. The discrete model proposed here will facilitate this
investigation, as the calculations can be performed by hand, and the model explicitly incorporates a
parameter of asymmetry of the scatterer and a parameter analogous to the angle of incidence.
In our model, the peaks and dips of the transmission anomalies reach 100% and 0%. For lossless
photonic slab structures, these extremes are commonly observed and, in certain simple cases, can
be analytically demonstrated. In a forthcoming communication, we will present a proof that the
anomalies attain these extreme values for lossless periodic dielectric slab/air systems that are
symmetric about a plane parallel to the slab.
It is worthwhile to compare the mechanism of resonance associated with a guided mode of an
open periodic waveguide at a wavenumberfrequency pair i
0
. .
0
that is isolated in the i. .
plane to the mechanism associated with the introduction of periodicity into a uniform slab. Fan and
Joannopoulos show how small holes periodically placed in an otherwise uniform slab lead to sharp
Fano-like transmission and reflection anomalies near the frequencies of certain leaky guided modes
or Bguided resonances[ [2]. As the radius of the holes vanishes, the width of the anomalies tends to
zero and the guided resonances tend to true guided modes of the uniform slab (see [2, Fig. 12]). If
the period of the slab, which is defined by the placement of the holes, is artificially retained in the
uniform slab, the wave vectorfrequency relation defining its guided modes can be conceived as a
dispersion relation for guided modes at frequencies embedded in the continuum. This is in contrast
to the isolated embedded guided mode with which we deal in this paper.
In the case of an isolated embedded guided mode, the wavenumber i (or, equivalently, the angle
of incidence) serves as a perturbation parameter that couples the mode to the extended states,
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 921
resulting in anomalous scattering. In contrast, the guided mode of a uniform slab is robust under
perturbation of i and, instead, the small radius of the holes serves as the coupling parameter and
the mechanism for resonance. The ubiquity of the line shape of the anomaly is discussed in [15], in
which the authors generalize a theory developed in [2] for energy transport through a photonic
crystal slab mediated by a combination of direct (nonresonant) and indirect (resonance-mediated)
channels.
The analysis of [8] and [11], together with the use of discrete models, can be extended to
incorporate geometric and material parameters, thus extending (17) and (18) to a much more
general class of mechanisms of resonance. In a discrete model, for example, in which plane waves
in an ambient 2-D lattice are scattered by a 1-D periodic chain attached to it along a line [32], the
formula has been extended to include a parameter of structural coupling between the 1-D and 2-D
lattices and has enabled the investigation of a fold bifurcation of resonances. A forthcoming
communication will treat the degenerate situation of simultaneous emergence of two Fano-type
transmission anomalies from the same bound-state frequency.
References
[1] M. Kanskar, P. Paddon, V. Pacradouni, R. Morin, A. Busch, J. F. Young, S. R. Johnson, J. MacKenzie, and T. Tiedje,
BObservation of leaky slab modes in an air-bridged semiconductor waveguide with a two-dimensional photonic lattice,[
Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 14381440, Mar. 1997.
[2] S. Fan and J. D. Joannopoulos, BAnalysis of guided resonances in photonic crystal slabs,[ Phys. Rev. B, Condens.
Matter, vol. 65, no. 23, p. 235 112, Jun. 2002.
[3] W. Suh, M. F. Yanik, O. Solgaard, and S. Fan, BDisplacement-sensitive photonic crystal structures based on guided
resonance in photonic crystal slabs,[ Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 82, no. 13, pp. 19992001, Mar. 2003.
[4] A. E. Miroshnichenko and Y. S. Kivshar, BEngineering Fano resonances in discrete arrays,[ Phys. Rev. E, Stat. Phys.
Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 72, no. 5, p. 056 611, Nov. 2005.
Fig. 6. (Top right) Transmission of energy versus frequency for the linear discrete model, which
supports a trapped mode at .
0
with M
0
M
1
2 and j 0. The transmission is shown for j 0 and
M
0
M
1
4. Each plot corresponds to a fixed value of M
0
; as this value ranges from 2.0 to 2.5, a sharp
anomaly emerges at .
0
and becomes wider. (Top left) Multivalued transmission graphs for the
nonlinear discrete model with j 0, M
0
M
1
4, ` 0.01, and intensity of the incident field I 1.0.
Again, M
0
ranges over values from 2.0 to 2.5. The fields corresponding to the upper branch of the
transmission graphs exhibit resonant amplitude enhancement in the scatterer. (Bottom) Individual
nonlinear transmission graphs, from M
0
2.5 (farthest from resonance) to M
0
2.0 (structure
supporting the trapped mode).
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 922
[5] A. Chakrabarti, BFano resonance in discrete lattice models: Controlling lineshapes with impurities,[ Phys. Lett. A, vol. 366,
no. 4/5, pp. 507512, Jul. 2007.
[6] S. Fan, P. Villeneuve, and J. Joannopoulos, BRate-equation analysis of output efficiency and modulation rate of
photonic-crystal light-emitting diodes,[ IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 11231130, Oct. 2000.
[7] J. Song, R. P. Zaccaria, M. B. Yu, and X. W. Sun, BTunable Fano resonance in photonic crystal slabs,[ Opt. Express,
vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 18121826, Sep. 2006.
[8] N. Ptitsyna, S. P. Shipman, and S. Venakides, BFano resonance of waves in periodic slabs,[ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf.
Math. Methods EM Theory, 2008, pp. 7378.
[9] S. P. Shipman, Resonant Scattering by Open Periodic Waveguides, Sharjah, UAE: Bentham, 2009.
[10] G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics. New York: Plenum, 1993.
[11] S. P. Shipman and S. Venakides, BResonant transmission near non-robust periodic slab modes,[ Phys. Rev. E, Stat.
Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 026 611-1026 611-10, Feb. 2005.
[12] P. Paddon and J. F. Young, BTwo-dimensional vector-coupled-mode theory for textured planar waveguides,[ Phys.
Rev. B, Condens. Matter, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 20902101, Jan. 2000.
[13] S. G. Tikhodeev, A. L. Yablonskii, E. A. Muljarov, N. A. Gippius, and T. Ishihara, BQuasiguided modes and optical
properties of photonic crystal slabs,[ Phys. Rev. B, Condens. Matter, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 045 102-1045 102-17,
Jul. 2002.
[14] U. Fano, BEffects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts,[ Phys. Rev., vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 1866
1878, Dec. 1961.
[15] S. Fan, W. Suh, and J. D. Joannopoulos, BTemporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical
resonators,[ J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, Opt. Image Sci., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 569572, Mar. 2003.
[16] W. Suh, O. Solgaard, and S. Fan, BDisplacement sensing using evanescent tunneling between guided resonances in
photonic crystal slabs,[ J. Appl. Phys., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 033 102-1033 102-4, Aug. 2005.
[17] S. Fan, BSharp asymmetric line shapes in side-coupled waveguide-cavity systems,[ Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 80, no. 6,
pp. 908910, Feb. 2002.
[18] H. Liu and P. Lalanne, BMicroscopic theory of the extraordinary optical transmission,[ Nature, vol. 452, no. 7188,
pp. 728731, Apr. 2008.
[19] F. Medina, F. Mesa, and R. Marque s, BExtraordinary transmission through arrays of electrically small holes from a
circuit theory perspective,[ IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 31083120, Dec. 2008.
[20] F. Medina, F. Mesa, and R. Marque s, BSome advances in the circuit modeling of extraordinary optical transmission,[
Radioengineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103110, Jun. 2009.
[21] F. Medina, F. Mesa, J. A. Ruiz-Cruz, J. M. Rebollar, and J. R. Montejo-Garai, BStudy of extraordinary transmission in a
circular waveguide system,[ IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 15321542, Jun. 2010.
[22] R. Rodr guez-Berral, F. Mesa, and F. Medina, BCircuit model for a periodic array of slits sandwiched between two
dielectric slabs,[ Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 96, no. 16, pp. 161 104-1161 104-3, Apr. 2010.
[23] S. Longhi, BBound states in the continuum in a single-level Fano-Anderson model,[ Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 57, no. 1,
pp. 4551, May 2007.
[24] V. Lousse and J. P. Vigneron, BUse of Fano resonances for bistable optical transfer through photonic crystal films,[
Phys. Rev. B, Condens. Matter, vol. 69, no. 15, p. 155 106, Apr. 2004.
[25] V. Borulko and D. Sidorov, BLinear and nonlinear resonances in Bragg layered structures with lumped parallel reactive
inhomogeneities,[ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Math. Methods EM Theory, 2010, pp. 14.
[26] A. R. Cowan and J. F. Young, BOptical bistability involving photonic crystal microcavities and Fano line shapes,[ Phys.
Rev. E, Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 68, no. 4, p. 046 606, Oct. 2003.
[27] M. F. Yanik, S. Fan, and M. Soljacic, BHigh-contrast all-optical bistable switching in photonic crystal microcavities,[
Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 83, no. 14, pp. 27392741, Oct. 2003.
[28] A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. F. Mingaleev, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, BNonlinear Fano resonance and bistable wave
transmission,[ Phys. Rev. E, Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top., vol. 71, no. 3, p. 036 626, Mar. 2005.
[29] A. R. McGurn and G. Birkok, BTransmission anomalies in Kerr media photonic crystal circuits: Intrinsic localized
modes,[ Phys. Rev. B, Condens. Matter, vol. 69, no. 23, p. 235 105, Jun. 2004.
[30] A. R. McGurn, BTransmission through nonlinear barriers,[ Phys. Rev. B, Condens. Matter, vol. 77, no. 11, p. 115 105,
Mar. 2008.
[31] A. R. McGurn, BTransmission through Kerr media barriers within waveguides and circuits,[ Proc. SPIE, vol. 7395,
p. 739 51T, 2009.
[32] N. Ptitsyna, BA discrete model of guided modes and anomalous scattering in periodic structures,[ Ph.D. dissertation,
Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA, 2009.
IEEE Photonics Journal Resonance Near Embedded Bound States
Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2010 Page 923