Addressing Model For Router Interfaces in Ad Hoc Networks
Addressing Model For Router Interfaces in Ad Hoc Networks
draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01
Carlos J. Bernardos Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Ronald in 't Velt TNO Information and Communication Technology Hiroshima, AUTOCONF WG, 2009-11-09
draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01
AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09
draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01
AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09
Terminology
Wireless link MANET interface MANET domain Attached MANET domain Non-overlapping prefix
draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01
AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09
This does not assume any prefix length (e.g., /32 or /128)
76th IETF, Hiroshima draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01 AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09
Routing protocols and applications running on ad hoc routers may or may not assume their existence and use them
But what if your OS decides, e.g. ND? (RFC3484)
Take resulting document as baseline for the practical addressing model work item
76th IETF, Hiroshima draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01 AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09
Specifically:
Add paragraph on scope of addressing model
Not just routing but also forwarding At least state whether applications on MANET i/f are allowed or not
Even if LLs are 'discouraged' for use in routing protocols, recognise that they have other uses, e.g. ND 'Non-overlapping prefixes' constitute a sufficient condition, don't prescribe /128 (/32)
Consider: what's the prefix length of a ULA? RFC 4291 compliance
draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01
AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09
Backup slides
draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01
AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09
draft-bernardos-autoconf-addressing-model-01
AUTOCONF WG 2009-11-09