0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views4 pages

Math 121 HW 7

The document contains solutions to homework problems involving field theory and polynomial factorization. It summarizes how to show polynomials are irreducible over certain fields using techniques like Eisenstein's criterion. It also computes extensions of fields by adjoining roots of polynomials and determines degrees of extensions. Examples include finding powers of elements in finite fields and determining whether extensions have degree 1 or 2.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
49 views4 pages

Math 121 HW 7

The document contains solutions to homework problems involving field theory and polynomial factorization. It summarizes how to show polynomials are irreducible over certain fields using techniques like Eisenstein's criterion. It also computes extensions of fields by adjoining roots of polynomials and determines degrees of extensions. Examples include finding powers of elements in finite fields and determining whether extensions have degree 1 or 2.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

HOMEWORK 7 SOLUTIONS

MATH 121

Problem

(13.1.1). Show that p(x) = x3 + 9x + 6 is irreducible in Q[x]. Let be a root of p(x). Find the inverse of 1 + in Q().

Solution.

Irreducibility follows from Eisenstein's criterion with p = 3. To evaluate 1/(1 + ), note that we must have 1/(1 + ) = a + b + c2 for some a, b, c Q. Multiplying this out, we nd that
a + (a + b) + (b + c)2 + c3 = 1,

but we also have 3 = 9 6, so this simplies to


(a 6c) + (a + b 9c) + (b + c)2 = 1.

Solving for a, b, c gives a = 5/2, b = 1/4, and c = 1/4. Thus


1 5 2 = + . 1+ 2 4 4
Problem

(13.1.2). Show that x3 2x 2 is irreducible over Q and let be a root. 1+ Compute (1 + )(1 + + 2 ) and 1+ in Q(). + 2 This polynomial is irreducible by Eisenstein with p = 2. We perform the multiplication and division just as in the previous problem to get
(1 + )(1 + + 2 ) = 3 + 4 + 22

Solution.

and

1+ 1 2 2 = + . 1 + + 2 3 3 3

(13.1.3). Show that x3 + x + 1 is irreducible over F2 and let be a root. Compute the powers of in F2 ().
Problem

If a cubic polynomial factors, then one of its factors must be linear. Hence, to check that x3 + x +1 is irreducible over F2 , it suces to show that it has no roots in F2 . Since F2 = {0, 1} has only two elements, it is easy to check that this polynomial
Solution.

Date

: 2 March, 2011.

MATH 121

has no roots. Hence it's irreducible. For the powers, we have


0 = 1, 1 = , 2 = 2 , 3 = + 1, 4 = 2 + , 5 = 2 + + 1, 6 = 2 + 1, 7 = 1.
Problem

(13.1.7). Prove that x3 nx + 2 is irreducible for n = 1, 3, 5.

If this polynomial is reducible, it must have a linear factor. By the rational root theorem, its linear factor must be of the form (x a), where a {1, 2}. So, we just check these four possibilities to nd out which values of n give us linear factors. If a = 1, then the polynomial has a root at a if and only if n = 1. If a = 1 or 2, then the polynomial has a root at a if and only if n = 3. If a = 2, then the polynomial has a root at a if and only if n = 5. Hence, x3 nx + 2 is irreducible for all other values of n.
Solution.
Problem

(13.2.1). Let F be a nite eld of characteristic p. Prove that |F| = pn for some positive integer n.

Suppose |F| were divisible by some other prime q . By Cauchy's theorem, there would be a subgroup of the additive group of F of order q . In particular, there would be some element x of (exact) additive order q , so qx = 0. But px = (1 + + 1)x = 0x = 0 (where there are p 1's in the parentheses). So, px = qx = 0, so 0 = gcd(p, q )x = x, which contradicts the claim that x had order q . Hence |F| is a power of p.
Solution.

(13.2.2). Let g (x) = x2 + x 1 and let h(x) = x3 x + 1. Obtain elds of 4, 8, 9, and 27 elements by adjoining a root of f (x) to the eld F where f (x) = g (x) or h(x) and F = F2 or F3 . Write down the multiplication tables for the elds with 4 and 9 elements and show that the nonzero elements form a cyclic group.
Problem

Solution.

We note that g and h are both irreducible over F2 and F3 . Hence F2 [x]/(g (x)) is a eld with 4 elements, F2 [x]/(h(x)) is a eld with 8 elements, F3 [x]/(g (x)) is a eld with 9 elements, and F3 [x]/(h(x)) is a eld with 27 elements. For the multiplication tables, we have

HOMEWORK 7 SOLUTIONS

for F4 and 0 1 2

0 1 x x+1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x+1 1 x 0 x x+1 1 1 x x+1 0 x+1

0 1 2 x x+1 x+2 2x 2x + 1 2x + 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 x x+1 x+2 2x 2x + 1 2x + 2 0 2 1 2x 2x + 2 2x + 1 x x+2 x+1 x 0 x 2x 2x + 1 1 x + 1 x + 2 2x + 2 2 1 x+2 2x 2 x 2x + 1 x + 1 0 x + 1 2x + 2 x + 2 0 x + 2 2x + 1 x + 1 2x 2 2x + 2 1 x 0 2x x x+2 2 2x + 2 2x + 1 x + 1 1 2x 2x + 1 0 2x + 1 x + 2 2x + 2 x 1 x+1 2 2x 2x + 2 0 2x + 2 x + 1 2 2x + 1 x 1 2x x+2 for F9 . These groups are cyclic, generated by x in each case. (More generally, any nite subgroup of the multiplicative groupof any eld is always cyclic.) (13.2.10). Determine the degree of the extension Since (1 + 2)2 = 3 + 2 2, we have
Q( 3 + 2 2) = Q( 2), 3 + 2 2 over Q.

Problem

Solution.

which has degree 2 over Q.


Problem

(13.2.11). (a) Let 3 + 4i denote the square root of the complex number 3 + 4i that lies in the rst quadrant and let 3 4i denote root the square of 3 4i that lies in the fourth quadrant. Prove that [Q( 3 + 4i + 3 4i) : Q] = 1. (b) Determine the degree of the extension Q( 1 + 3 + 1 3) over Q. (a) Since
3 + 4i = 1 + 2i and 3 4i = 1 2i, we have 3 + 4i + 3 4i = (1 + 2i) + (1 2i) = 2 Q.

Solution.

Hence the extension in question has degree 1. (b) We have


1+ 3 + 1

3 = 6. Hence, the extension is question is just Q( 6)/Q, which has degree 2.


Problem

(13.2.14). Prove that if [F () : F ] is odd then F () = F (2 ).

4
Solution.

MATH 121

Since is clearly a root of the quadratic equation X 2 2 in F (2 ), we must have [F () : F (2 )] = 1 or 2. But it can't be 2, since if it were, we would have
[F () : F ] = [F () : F (2 )][F (2 ) : F ],

and the rst degree on the right is even, so the degree on the left would also be even. This would contradict the hypothesis that [F () : F ] is odd. Hence [F () : F (2 )] = 1, meaning that F () = F (2 ). (There's another way to do this problem more explicitly, in terms of the minimal polynomial for .)
Problem

(13.2.17). Let f (x) be an irreducible polynomial of degree n over a eld F . Let g (x) be any polynomial in F [x]. Prove that every irreducible factor of the composite polynomial f (g (x)) has degree divisible by n. Let be a root of f (g (x)), and let L = F (). Then g () is a root of F . Let K = F (g ()). Hence K is a root eld of f over F . We have
[L : F ] = [L : K ][K : F ] = n[L : K ],

Solution.

so n | [L : F ]. But [L : F ] is the degree of the minimal polynomial of . Since was arbitrary, each factor of f (g (x)) has degree divisible by n.

You might also like