STATISTICS FOR MANAGERS

TERM PAPER

SUBMITTED BY:
SANCHITA SEN
SECTION C
ROLL NO. : C16
MBA-G(2012-14)

Q1: Frequency tables.

Tally for Discrete Variables: Restuarants in the last 2 month
Restuarants
in the last
2 month
1
2
3
N=

Count
14
11
5
30

CumCnt
14
25
30

Percent
46.67
36.67
16.67

CumPct
46.67
83.33
100.00

Q2: Pie-charts and Bar Diagrams for Personal Information

Pie Chart of Gender, Marital stat, chilren, no. of child, ...

Gender

Marital status

chilren

no. of children

education

occupation

annual income

Category
1
2
0
3
5
4

Chart of annual income

10

Count

annual income

Chart of occupation
25

Count

20

15

10

2
occupation

Chart of education
25

Count

20

15

10

2
education

Chart of no. of children

25

Count

20

15

10

1
no. of children

Chart of chilren
25

Count

20

15

10

2
chilren

Chart of Marital status

30
25

Count

20
15
10
5
0

2
Marital status

Chart of Gender
18
16
14

Count

12
10
8
6
4
2
0

2
Gender

Q:3 Box Plot for Q-4 in questionnaire.

Boxplot of price of foo, speed of ser, convinient l, variety, ...

5

Data

1
price of food

speed of service

convinient location

variety

friendly employees

Q:4 Summary statistics of the above question.

Descriptive Statistics: price of foo, speed of ser, convinient l, variety, ...
Variable
price of food
speed of service
convinient location
variety
friendly employees

Mean
1.900
1.833
1.567
1.700
2.467

SE Mean
0.154
0.136
0.177
0.145
0.243

Variable
price of food
speed of service
convinient location
variety
friendly employees

Q1
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000

Median
2.000
2.000
1.000
2.000
2.500

StDev
0.845
0.747
0.971
0.794
1.332
Q3
2.250
2.000
2.000
2.000
3.000

Variance
0.714
0.557
0.944
0.631
1.775
Maximum
4.000
4.000
5.000
4.000
5.000

CoefVar
44.47
40.73
62.01
46.73
54.01
IQR
1.250
1.000
1.000
1.000
2.000

Sum
57.000
55.000
47.000
51.000
74.000

Mode
2
2
1
2
1

Minimum
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000

N for
Mode
12
16
20
15
10

Q:5 t-test for the satisfaction level of females and males comparision.
Taking hypothesis:
H0: satisfaction of females<= satisfaction level of males.

Ha:

satisfaction level of females > satisfaction level of males.

H0 being the null hypothesis and Ha being the alternative hypothesis.
Two-sample T for speed of service vs Gender
speed of service
Gender

N
30
30

Mean
1.833
1.567

StDev
0.747
0.504

SE Mean
0.14
0.092

Difference = mu (speed of service) - mu (Gender)

Estimate for difference: 0.267
95% CI for difference: (-0.064, 0.597)
T-Test of difference = 0 (vs not =): T-Value = 1.62

P-Value = 0.111

DF = 50

Interpretation :
SINCE THE P-VALUE IS GREATER THAN 0.05 , THEREFORE WE CANNOT REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS.
HENCE WE FAIL TO CONCLUDE THAT THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF FEMALES IS GREATER THAN THE
MALES.

Q:6 cross tabulation and chi-square test for (i)Q:1 and Q:3 in the questionnaire.
(ii)Q:1 and Q:5 in the questionnaire.

(i)Tabulated statistics: Restuarants in the last 2 month, money spent

Rows: Restuarants in the last 2 month

Columns: money spent

All

3
21.43
25.00
10.00
5.600

11
78.57
61.11
36.67
8.400

14
100.00
46.67
46.67
14.000

8
72.73
66.67
26.67
4.400

3
27.27
16.67
10.00
6.600

11
100.00
36.67
36.67
11.000

1
20.00
8.33
3.33
2.000

4
80.00
22.22
13.33
3.000

5
100.00
16.67
16.67
5.000

12
40.00
100.00
40.00
12.000

18
60.00
100.00
60.00
18.000

30
100.00
100.00
100.00
30.000

All

Cell Contents:

Count
% of Row
% of Column
% of Total
Expected count

Pearson Chi-Square = 7.754, DF = 2, P-Value = 0.021

Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square = 7.937, DF = 2, P-Value = 0.019
* NOTE * 3 cells with expected counts less than 5

(ii) Tabulated statistics: Restuarants in the last 2 month, suggestion to friends

Rows: Restuarants in the last 2 month
1

All

13
92.86
86.67
43.33
7.000

1
7.14
8.33
3.33
5.600

0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.400

14
100.00
46.67
46.67
14.000

0
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.500

11
100.00
91.67
36.67
4.400

0
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.100

11
100.00
36.67
36.67
11.000

2
40.00
13.33

0
0.00
0.00

3
60.00
100.00

5
100.00
16.67

Columns: suggestion to friends

All

6.67
2.500

0.00
2.000

10.00
0.500

16.67
5.000

15
50.00
100.00
50.00
15.000

12
40.00
100.00
40.00
12.000

3
10.00
100.00
10.00
3.000

30
100.00
100.00
100.00
30.000

Cell Contents:

Count
% of Row
% of Column
% of Total
Expected count

Pearson Chi-Square = 41.421, DF = 4

Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square = 42.666, DF = 4
* WARNING * 1 cells with expected counts less than 1
* WARNING * Chi-Square approximation probably invalid
* NOTE * 6 cells with expected counts less than 5

Q:7 Regression analysis

Regression Analysis: speed of service versus preference to healthy food

The regression equation is
speed of service = 1.507 + 0.1343 preference to healthy food
S = 0.736891

R-Sq = 6.0%

Predictor
Constant
preference to healthy food

R-Sq(adj) = 2.6%
Coef
1.5066
0.1343

SE Coef
0.2799
0.1009

T
5.38
1.33

P
0.000
0.194

Analysis of Variance
Source
Regression
Error
Total

DF
1
28
29

SS
0.9624
15.2042
16.1667

MS
0.962419
0.543009

F
1.77

P
0.194

Regression Analysis: speed of service versus p_variety

The regression equation is
speed of service = 1.123 + 0.2632 p_variety
S = 0.705332

R-Sq = 13.8%

R-Sq(adj) = 10.8%

Predictor
Constant
p_variety

Coef
1.1228
0.2632

SE Coef
0.3590
0.1241

T
3.13
2.12

P
0.004
0.043

Analysis of Variance
Source
Regression
Error
Total

DF
1
28
29

SS
2.2368
13.9298
16.1667

MS
2.23684
0.49749

F
4.50

P
0.043

Regression Analysis: speed of service versus for lunch

The regression equation is
speed of service = 1.353 + 0.2087 for lunch
S = 0.706471
Predictor
Constant
for lunch

R-Sq = 13.6%

Coef
1.3532
0.20875

SE Coef
0.2629
0.09961

R-Sq(adj) = 10.5%
T
5.15
2.10

P
0.000
0.045

Analysis of Variance
Source
Regression
Error
Total

DF
1
28
29

SS
2.1918
13.9748
16.1667

MS
2.19185
0.49910

F
4.39

P
0.045

Regression Analysis: speed of service versus breakfast

The regression equation is
speed of service = 2.01 - 0.070 breakfast
Predictor
Constant
breakfast

Coef
2.0100
-0.0697

S = 0.756023

SE Coef
0.3587
0.1307

R-Sq = 1.0%

T
5.60
-0.53

P
0.000
0.598

R-Sq(adj) = 0.0%

Analysis of Variance
Source
Regression
Residual Error
Total

DF
1
28
29

SS
0.1627
16.0040
16.1667

MS
0.1627
0.5716

F
0.28

P
0.598

Regression Analysis: speed of service versus home delivery

The regression equation is
speed of service = 1.47 + 0.151 home delivery
Predictor
Constant
home delivery

Coef
1.4719
0.1506

SE Coef
0.3374
0.1288

S = 0.741949

R-Sq = 4.7%

T
4.36
1.17

P
0.000
0.252

R-Sq(adj) = 1.3%

Analysis of Variance
Source
Regression
Residual Error
Total

DF
1
28
29

SS
0.7530
15.4137
16.1667

MS
0.7530
0.5505

F
1.37

P
0.252

Q:8 ANOVA
One-way ANOVA: price of food versus Gender
Source
Gender
Error
Total

DF
1
28
29

S = 0.8390

Level
1
2

N
13
17

SS
0.990
19.710
20.700

MS
0.990
0.704

R-Sq = 4.78%

Mean
1.6923
2.0588

StDev
0.7511
0.8993

F
1.41

P
0.246

R-Sq(adj) = 1.38%
Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on
Pooled StDev
-----+---------+---------+---------+---(------------*-------------)
(-----------*-----------)
-----+---------+---------+---------+---1.40
1.75
2.10
2.45

Pooled StDev = 0.8390

One-way ANOVA: price of food versus Marital status

Source
Marital status
Error
Total
S = 0.8527

DF
1
28
29

SS
0.343
20.357
20.700

R-Sq = 1.66%

MS
0.343
0.727

F
0.47

P
0.498

R-Sq(adj) = 0.00%
Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on
Pooled StDev

Level
1
2

N
28
2

Mean
1.9286
1.5000

StDev
0.8576
0.7071

------+---------+---------+---------+--(----*---)
(----------------*-----------------)
------+---------+---------+---------+--0.70
1.40
2.10
2.80

Pooled StDev = 0.8527

One-way ANOVA: price of food versus chilren

Source
chilren
Error
Total

DF
1
28
29

SS
0.565
20.135
20.700

S = 0.8480

Level
1
2

N
4
26

MS
0.565
0.719

R-Sq = 2.73%

Mean
2.2500
1.8462

StDev
0.9574
0.8339

F
0.79

P
0.383

R-Sq(adj) = 0.00%
Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on
Pooled StDev
--+---------+---------+---------+------(----------------*----------------)
(------*------)
--+---------+---------+---------+------1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00

Pooled StDev = 0.8480

One-way ANOVA: price of food versus education

Source
education
Error
Total
S = 0.8716

Level
1
2
3

N
1
26
3

DF
2
27
29

SS
0.187
20.513
20.700

MS
0.094
0.760

R-Sq = 0.90%

Mean
2.0000
1.9231
1.6667

StDev
*
0.8449
1.1547

F
0.12

P
0.885

R-Sq(adj) = 0.00%
Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on
Pooled StDev
--------+---------+---------+---------+(-----------------*-----------------)
(--*---)
(----------*---------)
--------+---------+---------+---------+1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0

Pooled StDev = 0.8716

One-way ANOVA: price of food versus occupation

Source
occupation
Error
Total

DF
3
26
29

SS
1.073
19.627
20.700

MS
0.358
0.755

F
0.47

P
0.703

S = 0.8688

Level
1
2
3
5

N
25
1
1
3

R-Sq = 5.19%

Mean
1.9600
1.0000
2.0000
1.6667

StDev
0.8406
*
*
1.1547

R-Sq(adj) = 0.00%
Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on
Pooled StDev
-------+---------+---------+---------+-(--*--)
(--------------*--------------)
(--------------*--------------)
(--------*-------)
-------+---------+---------+---------+-0.0
1.2
2.4
3.6

Pooled StDev = 0.8688

One-way ANOVA: price of food versus annual income

Source
annual income
Error
Total
S = 0.8771

Level
1
2
3
4

N
10
8
10
2

DF
3
26
29

SS
0.700
20.000
20.700

R-Sq = 3.38%

Mean
1.8000
1.7500
2.1000
2.0000

StDev
0.7888
0.7071
1.1005
0.0000

Pooled StDev = 0.8771

MS
0.233
0.769

F
0.30

P
0.823

R-Sq(adj) = 0.00%
Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on Pooled StDev
+---------+---------+---------+--------(-------*-------)
(--------*--------)
(-------*-------)
(------------------*-----------------)
+---------+---------+---------+--------0.70
1.40
2.10
2.80