Kinetics of Solidification 3: 13.1 Solid-Liquid Interface Structure
Kinetics of Solidification 3: 13.1 Solid-Liquid Interface Structure
Kinetics of Solidification 3: 13.1 Solid-Liquid Interface Structure
Qin)
Figure 1. Atomic interaction in cubic lattice Atom at interface possesses higher energy than at solid. The excess energy comes from the losing of the atom-atom interaction bond. The change of enthalpy in constant pressure solidification is expressed as
'H 'u p 'V
(13.1)
In 'V
(13.2)
The heat of fusion 'H is the change of the internal energy caused by losing of the interaction bond from solid to liquid state. Suppose that an atom in solid has
totally m bonds, each bond is then with energy of 'H/m. The atom-atom bonds in cubic lattice are illustrated in figure 1.
For a perfect surface where all the possible atom positions are filled, the bonding 'H energy for an atom at interface is mI mb , where mI and mb are the number m of bond of an atom with neighbored-atoms at interface and bulk solid, respectively. For a non-perfect interface where only x fraction of atom positions 'H are occupied, the bonding energy for an atom at interface is mI x mb . The m difference between bonding energy at the perfect and fractal interfaces are
'H mI mb 'H mI x mb m m 'H mI 1 x m
Suppose there are N possible atom positions at preface interface, the total internl energy difference is given by
'u Nx 'H mI 1 x 2 m m N 'H I x1 x 2 m
(13.3)
The free energy change between the perfect and the fractal interfaces is given by
'F 'u T'S
(13.4)
'S
NK x ln x (1 x) ln(1 x)
(13.5)
At melting temperature T=Tm, insulting equations (13.3) and (13.5) into (13.4) gives
'F NKTm O x1 x x ln x (1 x) ln(1 x) 2
(13.6)
where O
'H mI KTm m
Equation (13.6) expresses the relationship between the free energy and the atom occupation ratio at interface. The right hand side of the equation (13.6) is plotted in figure 2.
Figure 2. Free energy at different O It can be found from figure 2 that the minimum free energy appears at x=0.5 when O d 2. The interface is called diffuse interface and is illustrated in figure 3.
OK
m mI
4K
(13.7)
which means that the diffuse interface is most stable when the molar entropy of fusion is 4R. Most of the metallic materials are with this condition. For O>5, the free energy is minimum when xo0 or xo1. The interface is flat. Most of organic materials are with this condition. Some materials such as Bi and Si are with 2<O<5. Interface structure is complicated. In diffuse interface, the transition from liquid to solid takes place over a number of atomic layers. Within the diffusion diffuse interface, ordering of atoms increases gradually with distance toward the fully crystalline side until essentially all the atoms are in their appropriate lattice site. There are lots positions for coming atoms to attach firmly on interface and crystal growth is considered continuously. The flat interface is atomically flat. The transition from liquid to solid takes place cross single atomic layer. The coming atoms can only attach to those step area otherwise the interaction is too loose, as illustrated in figure 4. Two-dimensional nucleation, screw dislocation and twin planes can form the steps.
13.2 Continuous growth The solid growth must involve a net flux of atom across it. From transition state theory by Turnbull, the liquid-solid atomic flux rate is
(13.8)
where A2 is the fraction of atom sites on liquid able to receive atom from solid. n1 is the number of atoms per unit area on solid side adjacent to liquid. Q1 is the vibration frequency. The backward rate is
J
(13.9)
A2 n1v1
The net flux is
A1n2v2
(13.10)
J J
(13.11)
J
Vm
NA
(13.12)
where Vm is molar volume and NA is Avogadros number. When the system is non-far from equilibrium, the interface velocity is v M'GmV (13.13)
(13.14)
13.3 Lateral growth There are three lateral growth formats, as illustrated in figure 6.
(a)
(b)
(c ) Figure 6. (a) Growth by two-dimensional nucleation. (b). Growth by screw dislocation. (c). Growth by propagation of twin planes. References 1. M.C. Flemings, Solidification processing, 1974. 2. A. L. Greer, Kinetics, Cambridge.