Tutorial-1 Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) Design: by Rashad.M.Ramzan Rashad@isy - Liu.se Objective
Tutorial-1 Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) Design: by Rashad.M.Ramzan Rashad@isy - Liu.se Objective
1/18
Goals:
After this tutorial, students should be able to Calculate the gain, input impedance and NF of common gate, common source, and shunt feedback amplifiers. Understand the basic equations and tradeoff between different LNA topologies. understand the tradeoff between the gain, NF, and impedance matching. A supplement tutorial LNA lab is also part of this course which takes the circuit from Problem-1.8 and guides through different analyses to design a practical LNA.
Perform the calculation for inductor degenerated common source topology and
2/18
Problem-1.1(Tutorial)
NMOS transistor is racing horse in LNA design arena due to its higher mobility compared to PMOS transistors. Calculate the IP3 of NMOS CS amplifier shown below. Assume that NMOS transistor is in saturation.
ID =
Kn (VGS VT ) 2 2
K n (VGS VT ) 2 2 1 + (VGS VT ) = Velocity Saturation, Mobility Degradation ID = VGS VT = 0.2V and = 0.1V 1
Observe that this transistor is not a very short channel device as << 1. c) What conclusion can be drawn from part b) about the bias current and transconductance of the transistor for higher IP3?
y ( x) = 0 + 1 x(t ) + 2 x 2 (t ) + 3 x 3 (t )
x(t)
4 1 3 3
VGS
NMOS
DC-bias
ID =
K n (VGS VT ) 2 1 + (VGS VT )
2
3/18
Here we assume a small signal x(t) around the bias (VGS VT), so
we define
VGS VT = V
2
K [x(t ) + V ] ID = n 2 ( x(t ) + V ) + 1
K R ( x(t ) + V ) Vo = I D RL Vo = n L 2 1 + ( x(t ) + V )
and we put
K n RL =K 2
<< 1 so
1 = 1 1+ 2
1 ( x(t ) + V ) 1 1 + ( x(t ) + V ) 2
1 = 2 KV
3 K 3 K V V 2 , 2 = K 2 2
4 3 2 Kv
3 =
K 2
AIP 3 =
4 1 = 3 3
3 KV 2 8 2V 2 = 3V 2 K 3 2
As << 1 3V can be ignored.
2
AIP 3 =
8 2 V 16 V = 3 3
4/18
AIP 3 =
16 V 16 (VGS VT ) = 3 3
-------------------------------(4)
Please, note that this formula only holds for small value of . For larger values compare the lecture notes.
In any case a large gate bias voltage (VGS VT) improves IP3.
Put
V = 0.2V, = 0.1 V -1
16 0.2 = 3.27Volts 3 0 .1
AIP 3 =
c). From
gm =
K (VGS VT ) ID = n 2 1 + (VGS VT )
2
AIP 3
32 I D 3 g m
As shown, IIP3 is decided by the ratio ID/gm which is constant for a given gate bias voltage. Using e.g. a wider transistor does not change this ratio and only the power consumption is increased.
Problem-1.2 (Tutorial)
It is preferred in current RF designs that the input of LNA be matched to 50 . The easiest way is to shunt the gate with a resistor of 50 . a) Calculate the gain, input impedance and NF in absence of gate noise. Assume that Rsh=RL for NF derivation. b) What are the disadvantages of shunt resistor with reference to gain and NF?
Electrical Engineering Department (ISY), Linkping University [email protected]
5/18
V 2 n , Rs
Rs Rsh
2
D gmVgs
Vout
V
S
n , Rsh
i 2d
RL
Vin
Rs Zin Rsh
RL Vout
RL is noiseless
F=
V 2 m , Rs = 4kTRs f
Gain Gate = g m RL
Rsh A = g m RL R +R s sh A = gm
2
V 2 m , Rsh = 4kTRsh f
i 2 d = 4kTg m f
for Rsh = Rs
RL 2
Using superposition, considering one at a time and shorting / opening other sources.
on , Rs
Rsh = V n , Rs g m RL R +R sh s
2 2 2
on , Rsh
Rs = V n , Rsh g m RL R +R sh s
2 2 2
6/18
V 2 no ,d = i 2 d R 2 L
F= V 2 on , Rs + V 2 on , Rsh + V 2 no ,d V 2 on , Rs =1+ V 2 on , Rsh + V 2 o ,d V 2 on , Rs
g 2 m R 2 L R 2 sh 4kTRsh f 2 ( Rs + Rsh ) 4kTg m f R 2 L + F =1+ g 2m R2L R2s g 2m R2L R2s kTR f 4kTRs f 4 S (Rs + Rsh )2 (Rs + Rsh )2
In case of impedance match Rs = Rsh
2 2 gm gm RL RL 4 = 2+ = 2+ F = 1+1+ 2 2 2 2 2 g R R g RL g m Rs Rs m S 2 L Rs m 4RS 4
b).
- Poor Noise Figure - Input signal attenuated by voltage divider - Rsh adds extra noise. - At high frequency, shunt L is needed to tune out Cgs - Reduced gain.
Problem-1.3 (Tutorial)
Another approach to get 50 input impedance match is shunt feedback amplifier shown below.
a) Calculate the gain, input impedance and NF neglecting the gate noise. The gate-drain, gate-bulk, and gate-source capacitance can be neglected as well. b) What are the disadvantage of shunt feedback amplifier with reference to gain and NF?
7/18 VDD
Solution:
Rs
n , RF
RF gmVgs
Vout
RF RL Rs Vin Zin
V 2 n , Rs
I 2 nD
RL Vout
I 2 nD = 4kTg m f ,V 2 RS = 4kTRS f
V 2 n , out A 2 v ,tot V 2 RS Total input noise power Output noise power due to input source
F=
Here Av,tot = Gain from Vin to Vout Again using superposition theorem
F=
V 2 n , out A 2 v ,tot V 2 RS
Vn
2 RS , out
+ Vn
2 RF , out
+ Vn
2 D , out
A 2 v ,tot V 2 RS
Gain Calculation
Av ,tot =
Rs Vgs
RF
Vout gmVgs RL
Av ,tot g m RL
Also
Z in =
8/18
---------------(1)
Rs Vgs
RF V
RF
V 2 RF ,out
gmVgs RL
Vgs = iRS = iRF VRF + VRF ,out VRF ,out = RL (i g mVgs ) VRF ,out = VRF
1 1+
2
RS + R F RL (1 + g m Rs )
= VRF
RL (1 + g m RS ) RF
n , RF ,out
R = V n , RF L (1 + g m RS ) RF
i Rs Vgs RF gmVgs
---------------------(2)
Similarly
V 2 nD ,out I 2 n,D
RL
VnD ,out RL
+ I nD + g mVgs +
VnD ,out RS + R F
I n,D
VnD ,out RS + R F
=0
Vgs = RS
VnD ,out =
g R 1 1 + + m S R L RS + R F RS + R F
2
I nD RL
So,
V 2 nD ,out = I 2 nD RL
------------------------------------------(3)
9/18
F = 1+
R V 2 n , RF L (1 + g m R S ) RF
A 2 v ,tot V 2 n , RS
I 2 nD R 2 L A 2 v ,tot V 2 n , RS
&
I 2 nD = 4kTg m
R F = 1+ S RF
b).
NF
1 1 + g m RS
+ g m RS
RS = 50
Problem-1.4 (HW)
Common gate amplifier also offers 50 input impedance match and solves the input matching problem.
c) Calculate the gain, input impedance and NF in absence on gate noise. Neglect gate drain and gate to bulk and gate to source capacitance. a) What are the disadvantage of common gate amplifier with reference to gain and NF?
Problem-1.5 (Tutorial)
The disadvantages of the amplifiers discussed in Problem-2, 3 & 4 can be circumvented by using the source degenerated LNA shown below.
10/18
a) Calculate the input impedance. This inductor source degenerated amplifier presents a noiseless resistance for 50 for input power match. How we can cancel the imaginary part of complex input impedance so that the LNA presents 50 real input resistance at input port. b) Calculate the NF in absence on gate noise. Neglect gate drain and gate to bulk and gate to source capacitance. c) Cgd bridges the input and output ports. The reverse isolation of this LNA is very poor. Why reverse isolation is important? Suggest the modification to improve reverse isolation.
Solution: a).
VS Rs Lg iin io Vout VS Ls Rs Lg
1 Vin = iin ( jLg + jLs ) + iin j c + io jLs ---------------(1) 1 --------------------------------------(2) io = g mVgs = g m iin jC gs
Substituting (2) in (1)
11/18
Z in =
Z in = j (Lg + Ls ) +
g L 1 + m s jC gs C gs
o (Lg + Ls ) =
And
1 1 2 o = (Lg + Ls )C gs o C gs
gm Ls C gs
RS = 50 =
Notes:
a). Ls is typically small and may be realized by the bond wire for source. b). Lg can be implemented by spiral/external inductor.
b).
From part a)
Z in = j (Lg + Ls ) +
g L 1 + m s jC gs C gs
Vin
C VC
Rs Vin
Here
Lg + Ls Zin
gm
Ls C gs
Cgs Vgs
Qs =
1 L o L 1 = = R C R o RC
and VC = QSVin
Qin =
o (L g + L s )
RS + g m LS C gs
o (L g + L s ) RS + T LS
Q T
gm C gs
Qin =
o R + S
g m LS C gs
C gs
RS =
g m LS C gs
12/18
Qin =
1 2 o Rs C gs
Gain
Vgs = QinVin
I g m = out V gs
Gm = I out V gs g m = = Qin g m V in V in
G m = Qin g m
Vout = G m R L where Gm = Qin g m Vin
so,
Noise Figure:
F=
Total noise power at output noise power at output due to input source
=1+ V 2 nD ,OUT V 2 nRS ,OUT
i 2 n , D = 4kTg m f
F=
V 2 n , RS = 4kTRS f
&
Gm = Qin g m
Q g R
2 in
2 m
2 L
i 2 n , D = 4kTg m , V 2 n , RS = 4kTRS
F = 1+
2 g m R S Qin
Notes:
- Very good NF value - Narrow band matching - NF
with Q 2
13/18
C). Drawbacks
i).
VDD RL Vout Ls
RL generates noise so replace RL with LD so thats
VDD LD VS Rs Lg Ls CL
VS
Rs
Lg
o =
1 LD C L
The CL can be considered the input capacitance of the following mixer or filter.
VDD
ii).
CL
Lo
Reverse isolation depends upon capacitance between output and input. To make it less the cascode architecture can be used.
(Final Design)
Problem-2.6 (HW)
Fill-in the Table below, use the data from Problem-2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7
Zin Rsh
Noise Factor
Gain
NF (dB)
2+
4 g m RS
g m RL 2
14/18
a) Calculate the NF for all above amplifiers. Assume =2, gm = 20mS, Rs = 50, RF = 500, and Qin = 2. b) Which is the best topology for Narrow Band LNA design at high frequency?
Problem-1.7 (Tutorial)
Real Design: We will design the inductor-source-degenerated LNA shown in Fig below to meet the specification outlined for IEEE802.11b standard. The first cut approximate values are calculated as a starting point for simulation. In LAB3: Design of LNA you will take the same design and modify these component values to meet the specification. LNA Specification: NF < 2.5 dB, Gain > 15dB, IIP3 > -5dBm, Centre Frequency = 2.4 GHz S11 < -20dB, S22 < -10dB, Load Capacitance = 1pF Technology Parameters for 0.35um CMOS:
Solution:
Technology 0.35m CMOS:
2 2 o Cox = 170 A V , p Cox = 58 A V , 2 C = mF m = L = m 4 . 6 , 2 , 0 . 35 ox eff
Design Parameters
NF < 2.5 dB, Gain > 15dB, IIP3 > -5dBm, f0 = 2.4 GHz
15/18
Vin
Component Description
Ls Matches input impedance Lg Sets the Resonant Frequency fO = 2.4 GHz M3 Biasing transistor which forms current mirror with M1 Ld Tuned output increases the gain and also work as band pass filter with CL M2 Isolates tuned input from output to increase reverse isolation, also reduces the effect of Miller capacitance Cgd CB BC blocking capacitor chosen to have negligible reactance at fO = 2.4 GHz RBIAS Large enough so that its equivalent current noise is small enough to be ignored. (Dont consider it as voltage noise source. Why??)
Design Procedure
Size of M1: From the noisy two-port theory (see the course book or lecture notes):
Gopt = C gs
1 2 1 C = 5 50
----------------------(1)
Wopt =
1 3o Leff Cox RS
[email protected]
Fmin, p = 1 + 2.4
Fmin, p = 1 + 5.6 T T C 1 C
16/18
---------------(A)
Fmin = 1 +
2 5 T
) = 1 + 2.3
Fmin = 1 + 2.3
-------------------------------------------------(B)
(A) is minimum NF for a given power consumption. (B) is global minimum noise figure. In practice the difference is usually 0.5dB to 1dB (no big deal for Lower Power)
Step - 1:
WM 1 =
1 3 0 L eff C ox R S
RS = 50, Cox = 4.6 mF m 2 , n Cox = 170 A V , Leff = 0.35m, o = 2f o , f o = 2.4GHz
WM 1 =
1 3 0.35 4.6m 50 o
W g m1 = 2 n C ox I DM 1 L M1
g m1 =
2 I DM 1 VGS VT
17/18
Assuming Now
=2 o T
Fmin = 1 + 5.6
This NF is very close to the specified value. If we increase ID then T should increase slightly as well and hence, a lower NF value can be achieved at expense of more power. Step - 4: Source and gate inductance such that they cancel Cgs and set
50 input impedance
LS =
RS
50 0.5nH 100G
Lg + Ls =
Lg 10nH
Step - 5:
Ld = Ld =
1 o 2C L
2
Q C L = 1 pF
1 4.4nH (15G ) 1 pF
Ld = 4.4nH
Electrical Engineering Department (ISY), Linkping University [email protected]
18/18
C B = 10 pF ( X C 6.6
Step - 7: Size M2 = M3
XB =
1 = 6.6 ) 2f o C B
So that they can have shared Drain Area.. (Note: We will simulate same LNA circuit in LAB # 2)
a) Compare intuitively the NF of single ended and differential amplifier if both have same power consumption. b) If low power is not a parameter on interest, which LNA has lower NF?
Instructions:
For hand calculation of NF you can ignore the gate noise of the device and noise generated by the load resistance RL.