694 J SCI IND RES VOL 70 AUGUST 2011

Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research

Vol. 70, August 2011, pp. 694-698
*Author for correspondence
Tel.: +91 11 26591260; Fax: +91 11 26591121
E-mail: [email protected]
Comparative study of performance and emissions characteristics of a diesel engine
fueled with jatropha and karanja biodiesel
Lalit Prasad
1
, Subhalaxmi Pradhan
2
, C S Madankar
2
, L M Das
1
* and S N Naik
2
1
Centre for Energy Studies,
2
Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,
New Delhi 110 016, India
Received 04 May 2011; revised 14 June 2011; accepted 16 June 2011
This study presents extraction of oil by mechanical expeller and solvent extraction technique from jatropha and karanja seeds.
Physico-chemical properties of extracted oil, jatropha oil methyl ester (JOME) and karanja oil methyl ester (KOME) were tested
for their suitability in diesel engine. Mechanical extraction efficiency with expeller developed by IIT Delhi was found to be better
(jatropha, 87%; karanja, 86%) as compared to traditional expeller (67-69%). Induction periods (oxidation stability) at 110C were
found to be: JOME, 1.76; and KOME, 2.24 h. Calorific value of JOME (38.65 MJ/kg) and KOME (40.75 MJ/kg) was
comparatively lower to base diesel (44.50 MJ/kg). Comparative performance (brake thermal efficiency, brake specific fuel
consumption) and emission (CO, THC, NO
x
and smoke opacity) characteristics were tested in 4.4 kW, single cylinder, compres-
sion ignition engine with constant speed (1500 rpm).
Keywords: Biodiesel, Esterification, Oxidation stability, Transesterification
Introduction
Biodiesel as an alternate diesel fuel has attracted
considerable attention around the world due to its
renewable, biodegradable, eco-friendly and non-toxic
nature
1,2
. Different tree borne non-edible oil seeds
(jatropha, karanja, mahua, simaruba, castor and neem)
have been identified as a potential source for biodiesel
production in India. Crude oil consumption has continued
to rise @ 4.8% per annum since 2005
3
. A National
Mission on Biodiesel identified Jatropha curcas as the
most suitable tree-borne oilseeds
4
. Indian approach to
biofuels is based solely on non-food feedstocks to be
raised on degraded or wastelands, thus avoiding a possible
conflict of fuel vs food security
5
. One of the major
technical issues facing biodiesel is its susceptibility to
oxidation upon exposure to oxygen in ambient air
6
.

Stability
of karanja oil methyl ester (KOME) has been improved
by adding different antioxidants
7-9
[tert-butylated hydroxy
toluene (BHT), tert-butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA),
pyrogallol (PY), propyl galate (PrG) and tert-butyl
hydroxyl quinone (TBHQ)]. Oxidation stability describes
degradation tendency of biodiesel and is of great
importance in the context of possible problems with
engine parts. During degradation, main oxidation products
(peroxides and hydroperoxides) form shorter-chain
compounds such as low molecular weight acids,
aldehydes, ketones and alcohols
10-11
.
This study presents oil extraction from jatropha and
karanja seeds by solvent extraction and mechanical
expression designed and fabricated by IIT Delhi
12
,
preparation of biodiesel [jatropha oil methyl ester (JOME)
and KOME] and physico-chemical analysis of oil as well
as methyl ester, besides comparative performance and
emission study of biodiesel blends (B15) of JOME and
KOME and diesel in single cylinder compression ignition
(CI) engine.
Experimental Section
Oil Extraction and Characterisation
Jatropha and karanja seeds were collected from IIT
campus, New Delhi, India. Seeds were cleaned manually
to remove all foreign materials, sun dried and then dried
in hot air oven till free from moisture. Seeds were
decorticated manually to obtain kernel. For oil content
determination
13
, grounded samples were extracted by
soxhlet apparatus using petroleum ether (b.p. 60-80C).
695 PRASAD et al: DIESEL ENGINE FUELED WITH JATROPHA AND KARANJA BIODIESEL
Both types of seeds (50 g each) were grounded separately
for 1 min, and sieved (sieve, 2 mm). Extract was
concentrated in rotavapour; residual oil was cooled and
weighed.
Fatty acid Composition of Seed Oils
Fatty acid composition was determined by gas
chromatographic (GC) analysis of fatty acid methyl esters
(FAMEs)
14
. GC analysis was carried out against standard
FAMEs (sigma make) on a Varian CP-3800 Gas
Chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector
(FID) and a 30 m 0.25 mm WCOT column coated
with 0.25 mm film thickness of polyethylene glycol (PEG)
supplied by J &W (Carbowax column). Helium was used
as carrier gas (flow rate, 1.0 ml/ min) at a column
pressure of 22 KPa. Each sample (0.2 l) was injected
into injection port of GC using a split ratio of 50:1.
Compound separation was achieved following a linear
temperature program of 160C (1 min), 160-240C (4C/
min), and 240C

(23 min); total run time was 45 min.
Composition (%) was calculated using peak normalization
method assuming equal detector response. Peaks were
identified by co-eluation of standard FAME samples
procured from Sigma-Aldrich and analyzed in the same
GC conditions.
Transesterification of Oil
FAME of both types of oils was prepared by acid
and alkali catalyzed reaction due to high acid value of
oil
15
. Acid catalyzed pretreatment was conducted at 55C
with methanol (CH
3
OH)/oil at a molar ratio of 6:1 and
an acid (conc. H
2
SO
4
) of 0.5% w/w of oil. Reaction
was continued till acid value was lowered and remained
constant. Acid catalyst was removed before alkali-
catalyzed transesterification. Reaction for preparation
of FAME of both types of oils was carried out with
CH
3
OH/oil at a molar ratio of 6:1 and catalyst (solid
KOH pellets; conc. 1% w/w of oil) at 65C and stirring
rate of 600 ppm
15
. Reaction mixture was separated in a
separating funnel and upper FAME layer was washed
with hot distilled water (70-80C) until resulting water
from washing remains neutral. Moisture was removed
from biodiesel by drying at 90-100C under vacuum and
passing FAME layer over anhydrous sodium sulphate.
Fuel Characterization and Stability of Biodiesel
Fuel properties (density, viscosity, flash point, cloud
point, pour point, water content etc.) of biodiesel were
determined as per Bureau of Indian standards test method
(IS-1448). Biodiesel ages more quickly than fossil diesel
fuel due to chemical structure of fatty acid alkyl esters.
Saturated fatty acid alkyl ester increases stability
whereas unsaturated fatty acid alkyl esters reduce
stability. Oxidation stability of both JOME and KOME
was measured with a Rancimat 743 (Metrohm,
Switzerland) instrument. Oxidation period was measured
at air flow 10 l/h with the heating block set at 110C.
Experiments were conducted in duplicate and mean value
of induction period was measured.
Performance and Exhaust Emissions in Engine
Comparative engine performance and emissions
characteristics of JOME B15 and KOME B15 were
tested in a Kirloskar make single cylinder, 4-stroke, water-
cooled diesel engine (rated power output 4.5 kW at 1500
rpm). Different exhaust emissions from engine were
studied keeping varying engine load (0, 25, 50, 75, and
100%) conditions. Each reading was replicated thrice to
get reasonable values. Engine exhaust emissions were
measured by AVL 437 Smoke Meter & AVL Di-gas
Analyser.
Results and Discussion
Oil Yield and Physicochemical Properties
Mechanical extraction efficiency with expeller
developed by IIT Delhi was found to be better (Table 1)
as compared to traditional expeller. Important physico-
chemical properties of jatropha and karnja oils,
Table 1 Oil yield and extraction efficiency of jatropha and karanja seeds
Process Jatropha oil Karanja oil
Yield, % Efficiency, % Yield, % Efficiency, %
Solvent extraction 34 100 32 100
Mechanical expeller 23 66.67 22 68.75
(traditional)
Mechanical expeller 30 86.95 27-28 85.94
(developed by IIT Delhi)
696 J SCI IND RES VOL 70 AUGUST 2011
respectively, were determined as follows: density, 0.92,
0.91 g/cc; viscosity
40C
, 34.8, 31.5 cSt; acid value, 9.86,
11.28 mgKOH/g; iodine value, 98.0, 86.6%; saponification
value, 189.7, 188.3 mg KOH/g; and unsaponifiable matter,
1.60, 2.4% (w/w).
Fatty Acid Composition of Oils
Fatty acid compositions of jatropha oil and karanja
oil, respectively, were found as follows: palmitic, 14.1;
11.6; stearic, 4.3, 7.5; oleic, 34.3, 51.5; linoleic, 29.0, 16.0;
linolenic, 0.3, 2.6; and others, 18, 10.8%.Thus saturated
fatty acids (palmitic and stearic) contributes 18.4% in
jatropha oil and 19.1% in karanja oil. Saturated fatty acids
increase ignition quality (cetane number), stability and
cloud point of fuels. Unsaturated fatty acids (oleic, linoleic
and linolenic) were: JOME, 63.6; and KOME, 70.1%.
Due to higher percentage of unsaturated fatty acids in
KOME compared to JOME, induction period for KOME
was found 2.24 h, while for JOME it was 1.76 h at
constant temperature of 110C. Fuel properties of test
blends (Table 2) were tested before engine study.
Engine Study
Performance
Comparative performance studies of JOME B15 and
KOME B15 with base diesel were carried out in single
cylinder CI engine. Variation in brake thermal efficiency
(BTE, Fig. 1) and brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC,
Fig. 2) were plotted to ascertain suitability of test blends
for engine application. Performance characteristics were
conducted at varying load (0-100% in five consecutive
steps) on engine. As load increases, BTE of JOME B15
and KOME B15 blends increases as expected in the
base diesel. Test blends of both JOME B15 and KOME
B15 show marginally lower BTE compared to base diesel.
However at 50% load, thermal efficiency of karanja
biodiesel blends were observed almost same as base
diesel. KOME B15 gives better thermal efficiency
compared to JOME B15 at all loads. Calorific value
(38.65 MJ/kg) of JOME is lower compared to KOME
(40.75 MJ/kg). This effect leads to decrease of marginal
BTE of all blends of JOME. Test blends of JOME and
KOME exhibits marginally higher BSFC compared to
Table 2Fuel properties of dieselbiodiesel blends of methyl ester of jatropha and karanja oil
Fuel Calorific value Density
15C
Viscosity
40C
Flash point Cloud point Pour point
blend (ASTM D420) (ASTM (ASTM D445) (ASTM D93) (ASTM (ASTM D97)
MJ/kg D4052) cSt C D2500) C
g/cm
3
C
Diesel 44.50 0.83 2.85 77 -4 -9
JB 100 38.65 .88 5.18 151 5 1
KB 100 40.75 .87 4.93 147 6 2
JB15 43.62 0.84 3.36 90 -1.3 -2.7
KB15 43.94 0.84 3.38 89 -1.4 -2.4
Fig. 1Brake thermal efficiency for diesel and biodiesel blends
Fig. 2Brake specific fuel consumption for diesel and biodiesel
blends
B
T
E
,

%
Load, % Load, %
S
F
C
,

g
/
k
W
h
697 PRASAD et al: DIESEL ENGINE FUELED WITH JATROPHA AND KARANJA BIODIESEL
base diesel, attributed to low heating value and thereby
more quantity of fuel is required for same quantity of
power output. The same power output is due to lower
calorific value of diesel-biodiesel blend fuel. However,
trend of variation is same as base diesel.
Exhaust Emissions
In diesel engine, major pollutants [smoke, unburnt
hydrocarbons (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx)] are
predominant. Different exhaust emissions [unburnt HC
and NOx, and carbon monoxide (CO)] from engine were
measured for biodiesel-diesel blends with base diesel.
HC emissions for both the test blends were lower
compared to base diesel (Fig. 3). However, in case of
KOME B15, HC emissions were less than JOME B 15,
possibly due to complete combustion of fuel leads to
higher thermal efficiency of KOME B15 in comparison
to JOME B15 at all loads. Up to 50% loads, emissions of
NOx was lower (Fig. 4); in all cases, this can be attributed
that combustion efficiency of biodiesel is higher than that
of diesel, as also reported
16
, resulting in lower combustion
chamber temperatures and lower NOx formation.
However, at higher loads, there was marginal increase
of NOx for both types of test blends. At partial and higher
loads, CO emissions show (Fig. 5) no rising trend and
remain stable upto higher loads. Smoke for both the test
blends were reduced significantly at all loads (Fig. 6).
Presence of oxygen atoms in the straight vegetable based
Fig. 3Hydrocarbon for diesel and biodiesel blends
Fig. 4Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) for diesel and biodiesel blends
Fig. 5Carbon monoxide (CO) for diesel and biodiesel blends
Fig. 6Smoke for diesel and biodiesel blends
Fig. 7Oxygen in exhaust for diesel and biodiesel blends
Load, %
C
O
,

%
Load, %
S
m
o
k
e
,

%
Load, %
O
2
,

%
H
C
,

p
p
m
Load, %
Load, %
N
O
x
,

p
p
m
698 J SCI IND RES VOL 70 AUGUST 2011
alky ester helps to combust fuel completely and reduces
smoke substantially. Oxygen content in exhaust emissions
was higher for both types of test blends (Fig. 7).
Conclusions
Efficiency of IIT Delhi developed expeller was found
to be > 85% of total oil content. Major fatty acid found
in two types of oils was oleic acid (C18:1) [jatropha (34%)
and karanja (52%)] followed by linoleic acid (C18:2)
[jatropha (29%) and karanja (16%)]. Straight vegetable
based fuel oxidized in short periods. Induction time for
KOME was found to be higher (2.24 h at 110in:C) than
JOME (1.76 h at 110C). Both test blends (JOME B15
and KOME B15) showed performance close to diesel.
Therefore, these blends can be used in IC engine.
However, KOME B15 showed better performance at
all loads (zero to full loads). Marginal lower BTE can be
attributed to lower calorific value of test blends. Lower
HC and smoke opacity emissions of biodiesel blends are
added values from environmental point of view.
Acknowledgement
Authors thank financial support under RC-UK DST,
India (EP/G021937/1) funded project.
References
1 Satyarthi J K, Srinivas D & Ratnasamy P, Estimation of free
fatty acid content in oils, fats, and biodiesel by
1
H NMR
Spectroscopy, Energy & Fuels, 23 (2009) 2273-2277.
2 Parawira W, Biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas: A
review, Sci Res & Essays, 5 (2010) 1796-1808.
3 Global Agriculture International Network Report, India Biofuels
Annuals (U S Department of Agriculture, USA) 2009.
4 Report on the committee on development of Biofuel, 2003 (Plan-
ning Commission, Govt of India, New Delhi) 2003; http://
www.planningcommission.gov.in/reports/genrep/cmtt_bio.pdf
5 National Policy on Biofuels (Govt of India, Ministry of New &
Renewable Energy, New Delhi); http://www.mnre.gov.in/policy/
biofuel-policy.pdf
6 Knothe G, Review: some aspects of biodiesel oxidative
stability, Fuel Process Technol, 88 (2007) 669-677.
7 Das L M, Bora D K, Pradhan S, Naik M K & Naik S N, Short
communication Long-term storage stability of biodiesel
produced from Karanja oil, Fuel, 88 (2009) 2315-2318.
8 Bora D K, Das L M & Babu M K G, Storage stability of mahua
oil methyl ester, J Sci Ind Res, 68 (2009) 149-152.
9 Schober S & Mittelbach M, The impact of antioxidants on
biodiesel oxidation stability, Eur J Lipid Sci Technol, 106 (2004)
382-389.
10 Tang H, Abunasser N, Wang A, Clark B R, Wadumesthrige K et
al, Quality survey of biodiesel blends sold at retail stations,
Fuel, 87 (2008) 2951-2955.
11 Karavalakis G, Stournas S & Karonis D, Evaluation of the
oxidation stability of diesel/biodiesel blends, Fuel, 89 (2010)
2483-2489.
12 Pradhan R C, Design & Development of low cost post
harvesting equipment for Jatropha, Ph D Thesis, Centre for
Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of
Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (under review).
13 AOAC, Official methods of analysis, 14
th
edn (Association of
Official Analytical Chemists Washington DC) 1994.
14 Hammond E W, Gas liquid chromatography, in
Chromatography for the Analysis of Lipids , edited by E W
Hammond (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) 1993.
15 Meher L C, Vidya Sagar D & Naik S N, Technical aspects of
biodiesel production by transesterfication : A Review, Ren Sust
Energy Rev, 10 (2006) 248-268.
16 Atadashi I M, Aroua M K & Aziz A A, High quality biodiesel
and its diesel engine application: A review, Ren Sust Energy Rev,
14 (2010)1999-2008.