General Principles of Credit Risk

@ HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY
., ~ ~ ~ l 1 l f f $ r n i
Supervisory Policy Manual
CR-G-1 General Principles of Credit Risk
V.1 -19.01.01
Management
This module should be read in conjunction with the Introduction and with the
Glossary, which contains an explanation of abbreviations and other terms
used in this Manual. If reading on-line, click on blue underlined headings to
activate hyperlinks to the relevant module.
Purpose
To summarise the main principles which Als are expected to follow in
managing credit risk.
Specific risk controls and systems that should be established are
covered in the other modules within the Credit Management section.
Classification
A statutory guideline issued by the MA under the Banking Ordinance,
7(3)
Previous guidelines superseded
Circular "Principles Underlying Prudent Credit Control by Authorized
Institutions" dated 14.02.00
Application
To all Als
Structure
1.
2.
3.
Introduction
Overview of the credit process
An appropriate credit risk environment
3.1 Credit risk strategy and policy
3.2 Risk tolerance and portfolio limits
3.3 Risk concentrations
3.4 New products
3.5 Delegated credit authority
'.
V. 1 - 19.01.01
Management
3.6 Accountability
3.7 Staff competence
4. Prudent procedures for approving credits
4.1 Major principles
5. Effective systems for credit administration, measurement and
monitoring
5.1 Credit administration
5.2 Measurement and monitoring of credit risk
5.3 Loan classification
5.4 Loan provisioning
6. Adequate controls over credit risk
6.1 Segregation of duties
6.2 Exception reporting
6.3 Risk mitigation
6.4 Managing problem credits
6.5 Independent audits
1. Introduction
1.1 The HKMA expects all Als to have comprehensive credit risk
management systems appropriate to their type, scope,
sophistication and scale of operations. These systems should
enable Als to identify, quantify, monitor and control credit risk
and to ensure that adequate capital resources are available to
cover the risk assumed.
1.2 Credit risk is the risk that a borrower or counterparty fails to
meet its obligations. It exists in both the banking book and the
trading book, and both on and off the balance sheet of an AI.
Obviously, credit risk arises from loans but there are other
sources of credit risk such as.
trade finance and acceptances;
interbank transactions;
commitments and guarantees;
2

V.1 -19.01.01
Management
interest rate, foreign exchange and credit derivatives
(including swaps, options, forward rate agreements and
financial futures);
bond and equity holdings; and
settlement of transactions1.
1.3 Every AI should hold sufficient capital to cover credit risk and
seek to strike an appropriate balance between risk and reward.
This can be done not by avoiding credit risk exposure but by
managing the risk the AI has chosen to take so that potential
credit losses are minimised.
1.4 Als which do not manage credit risk properly are likely to run
into serious problems. Such problems normally arise from:
lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties;
poor portfolio risk management; and
failure to identify in good time changes in economic or
other conditions that may impair the financial strength of
borrowers and counterparties.
It is therefore imperative that Als maintain effective systems to
manage credit risk.
2. Overview of the credit process
2.1 The credit process, which underlies the management of an AI's
credit risk exposures, normally includes the following functions
and components:
Credit strategy and policy - The Board of Directors is
ultimately responsible for approving an AI's credit risk
strategies and policies and ensuring that these are
appropriate to the business and observed within the
organisation. It may delegate all or part of its credit
1 In the settlement of, say, a foreign exchange transaction, there is a risk that one party may
settle late, or not at all. If one party settles late, the other party may need to borrow the
currency required from the market and incur interest cost until the former settles. If one party
defaults after receiving payment (e.g. due to differences in time zones), the other party loses
the whole principal (the potential loss could be larger than the principal if there is an adverse
price movement between the agreed rate and the market rate for replacing the contract).
3
@J HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY

CRG1 General Principles of Credit Risk
V. 1 - 19.01.01
Management
authority to the Credit Committee

2
or senior management
within the AI but will remain responsible for overseeing
credit risk management. The Credit Committee or senior
management is responsible for translating the Board's
credit strategy into actual business and for ensuring that
necessary credit risk management policies and
procedures are established to carry out such business.
Risk management - Als are recommended to maintain
an independent risk management function within the
middle office
3
to assist the Board in managing credit risk.
The risk management function, which is directly
accountable to the Board, the Credit Committee or senior
management, is responsible for formulating credit risk
management methodologies and strategies and the day-
to-day measurement, monitoring and evaluation of credit
risk within the AI.
Credit initiation - This function is typically performed by
the front office
3
. The account officers solicit credit
business within laid-down policies and manage the
relationship with customers. They may also be
responsible for preparing credit appraisals for new credit
facilities and for the renewal of existing facilities.
Credit evaluation, approval and review - This involves
independent evaluation of credit appraisals by the middle
office, e.g. credit control or risk management unit, and the
approval of facilities by designated credit officers, the
Credit Committee or the Board of Directors in accordance
with their credit authority. The process covers both
extension of new credits and renewal of eXisting credits.
The latter is embodied in the credit review process in
which the credit-worthiness of existing borrowers is
periodically updated and evaluated.
Credit administration - The back office
3
undertakes the
overall administration of the credit portfolio. It carries out
such responsibilities as checking of credit approval and
2 Please see para. 2.1.2 and footnote 1 of CR-G-2 "Credit Approval, Review and Records" for
a description of the key roles and functions of the Credit Committee.
3 Please see Diagram 1 of this module for an illustration of the typical functions performed by
the front, middle and back offices.
4
..
V.1-19.01.01
Management
documentation, lien perfection, loan disbursement,
collateral valuation, maintenance of credit files and
compilation of management information reports.
Credit measurement and monitoring - These functions
are performed at different levels. The Board or the Credit
Committee oversees credit monitoring on a portfolio basis
and may take part in reviewing large or connected
exposures. The front office monitors individual accounts
on a day-to-day basis and recommends changes in
internal credit rating and provisions where necessary.
The middle office monitors limits and other risk
parameters set down by the Board, reviews exception
reports and checks that problem accounts are properly
graded and provided against. It also performs periodic
reviews and analyses the quality of the credit portfolio
using stress-tests or other techniques. The back office
provides support to the process through the
measurement and reporting of credit risk exposures for
management information.
Problem loan management - This function ensures that
problem loans are handled effectively to minimise
ultimate credit losses. While less serious cases are
followed up by the front office, it is recommended that the
more serious accounts be transferred to a dedicated
work-out unit for collection within the middle office. The
Credit Committee or senior management is responsible
for overseeing the collection process on large non-
performing credits and determining the level of provisions
for problem accounts.
Independent audits - There should be independent
parties, e.g. Internal Audit and Compliance, to conduct
regular independent credit and compliance audits on Als.
These should have a direct reporting line to the Board or
the Audit Committee.
2.2 It is open to Als precisely how they structure the credit process
within their organisations. Nevertheless the key functions and
components as mentioned above should be present, however
named, and kept separate. In particular, the credit initiation
function should be independent of the credit approval and
review functions to avoid any potential conflict of interest. In
5

V.1 -19.01.01
Management
cases where an AI finds it necessary to delegate small lending
limits to staff in the front office for operational needs, there
should be adequate safeguards, e.g. independent review of
credits granted, to prevent abuse.
2.3 The way in which an AI may structure its credit management
functions is shown in Diagram 1. It should be emphasised that
this structure is illustrative only. Als have discretion as to the
precise organisational structure they adopt, provided that the
general principles of credit risk management set out in this
guideline are observed.
2.4 The quality of an AI's credit risk exposures is determined to a
large extent by the effectiveness of its systems and controls for
managing credit risk. The principal elements of a sound credit
risk management process include:
establishing an appropriate credit risk environment;
enforcing prudent procedures for approving credits;
maintaining effective systems for credit administration,
measurement and monitoring; and
ensuring adequate controls over credit risk.
The basic principles and requirements pertaining to these
elements are set out in the sections that follow.
3. An appropriate credit risk environment
3.1 Credit risk strategy and policy
3.1.1 Each AI should have a written statement of its credit risk
strategy and policy which should be consistent with its
degree of risk tolerance, level of capital available for
credit activities and credit management expertise.
6
'"
V.1 -19.01.01
Management
piagram 1; Organisation of credit fynctions
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Approving credit strategy and policies
Credit approval and monitoring (for large or connected
transactions)
Delegation of credit authority
Oversight of credit risk management
I
CREDIT COMMITTEE I SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Credit policy review
Implementing credit strategy and policies
Establishing credit policies and manuals
Credit approval and monitoring (within delegated limits)
Approving internal credit rating and provisions
Overseeing loan recovery progress
I
FRONT
OFFICE
Credit initiation/
appraisal
Credit approval
(small limits)
Recommending
internal credit
ratings and
provisions
On-going
monitoring of
individual
accounts
I
MIDDLE OFFICE
Recommending risk management
methodologies
Limit/exceptions monitoring
Independent credit
evaluation/review
Credit approval (Within delegated
limits)
Independent review of internal credit
ratings and provisions
Portfolio review and analysis
Stress-testing
Problem loan work-out
I
BACK OFFICE
Checking credit
approval and
documentation
Lien perfection
Fund disbursement
Credit file
maintenance
Measurement and
reporting of credit
risk exposures
Collateral valuation
INTERNAL AUDIT
4
and COMPLIANCE
Credit audit
Compliance audit
4 Internal Audit should report directly to the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee.
7
.,
V.1 - 19.01.01
Management
3.1.2 The credit risk strategy and policy (including the criteria
to be used in approving credit applications) should be
approved by the Board of Directors. The Board should
also review the strategy and policy periodically (at least
annually) in the light of the AI's financial results, market
conditions and trends and its capital resources.
3.1.3 The credit risk strategy should encompass the need to
maintain sound credit quality, profits and business
growth. Als are in business to be profitable. They
therefore have to decide on what risk/reward relationship
is acceptable for their business, after taking into account
resource and capital costs.
3.1.4 The credit risk strategy should allow for economic cycles
and their effects on the credit portfolio during different
stages of an economic cycle. For example, it should
cater for a higher incidence of defaults in the personal
loan and credit card portfolios in times of economic
recession.
3.1.5 The credit risk policy should follow the principles of
prudence. It should be enforced and applied
consistently. It should ensure that credit facilities are
only granted to credit-worthy customers and that risk
concentrations are avoided. It guides management on
how business is to be developed.
3.1.6 The credit risk policy should not be relaxed because of
competitive pressures. Any changes to the policy should
be approved by the Board of Directors and should not
expose the AI to excessive risk.
3.1.7 Locally incorporated Als with overseas branches should
establish credit risk policies adapted to local conditions.
3.1.8 Als granting credit to obligors in other countries should
cater for the fact that in so doing they incur additional
risks - country risk and transfer risk. They should
therefore take account of the environment - economic
and political - in those countries, the potential effect of
changes thereto on the obligors' ability to service the
credit and the contagion effects in regions where
economies are closely related.
8
HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY

V. 1 -19.01.01
Management
3.1.9 The Credit Committee or senior management should be
responsible for carrying out the strategy laid down by the
Board and for establishing procedures to identify,
quantify, monitor and control the credit risk inherent in
the AI's activities and at the level of both the overall
portfolio and individual borrowers/counterparties.
3.1.10 The credit risk strategy and policy need to be clearly
disseminated to, and understood by, all relevant staff,
and should be applied, where appropriate, on a
consolidated basis and at the level of individual
subsidiaries.
3.2 Risk tolerance and portfolio limits
3.2.1 Als should be very clear about their credit risk tolerance,
including how much, and what types of, risk they are
prepared to undertake. Risk tolerance should be
compatible with Als' strategic objectives.
3.2.2 The credit risk policy should specify, among other things:
types of facilities to be offered, along with ceilings,
pricing, profitability, maximum maturities and
maximum debt-servicing ratios for each type of
lending;
a ceiling for the total loan portfolio, in terms, for
example, of the loan-to-deposit ratio, undrawn
commitment ratio, a maximum dollar amount or a
percentage of capital base;
portfolio limits for maximum aggregate exposures
by country, industry, category of
borrower/counterparty (e.g. banks, non-bank
financial institutions, corporates and retail),
product (e.g. property lending), groups of related
parties and single borrowers;
limits, terms and conditions, approval and review
procedures and records kept for connected
lending - all Als should have a formal policy
statement, endorsed by the Board of Directors, on
such lending covering these matters;
types of acceptable collateral, loan-to-value ratios
and the criteria for accepting guarantees; and
9
~ ~ ~ I l t ~ l ! I ! f i U
V. 1 - 19.01.01
Management
the minimum information required from loan
applicants.
3.3 Risk concentrations
3.3.1 Als should establish a policy, endorsed by the Board of
Directors, to control and monitor large exposures and
other risk concentrations.
3.3.2 Als should carefully manage and avoid excessive risk
concentrations of various kinds. These include exposure
to:
individual borrowers (in particular exposure
exceeding 10% of the AI's capital base);
groups of borrowers with similar characteristics,
economic and geographical sectors; and
types of lending with similar characteristics (e.g.
those based on assets with similar price
behaviour).
3.3.3 Als should analyse their portfolios intelligently to identify
inter-dependencies. The importance can be illustrated
by the contagion effects that a substantial decline in
property or stock prices may have on the default rate of
those commercial and industrial loans which rely heavily
on such types of collateral.
3.3.4 Notwithstanding the 25% limit on large exposures under
81 of the Banking Ordinance, Als should exercise
particular care in relation to facilities exceeding 10% of
capital base.
3.3.5 Als should beware of fads. For example, business with
companies in the internet sector should be based on
sound banking principles and Als should not be swayed
by what is fashionable.
3.3.6 Als should guard against over-extension of credit to
asset-dependent sectors such as the property and stock
markets and to other speculative investments. Such risk
concentrations can leave Als unduly exposed to a
collapse in asset prices with consequent increased
defaults by debtors.
10
.,
V. 1 - 19.01.01
Management
3.3.7 Where long-term domestic lending is financed by short-
term external borroWing, a reversal of capital flows can
lead to a liquidity squeeze and exposure to possible
adverse exchange rate movements. Als should
establish prudent mismatch limits to control such risks.
3.4 New products
3.4.1 Als should recognise and control the credit risk arising
from their services and activities, including the risks from
new products.
3.4.2 Before Als enter into new types of products and
activities, they should ensure that they understand the
risks fully and have established appropriate credit risk
policies, procedures and controls, which should be
approved by the Board of Directors or its appropriate
delegated committee. A formal risk assessment of new
products and activities should also be performed and
documented.
3.5 Delegated credit authority
3.5.1 Credit authority should be clearly delegated by an AI's
Board of Directors.
3.5.2 Credit authority should be appropriate for the products or
portfolios assigned to the Credit Committee or individual
credit officers and should be commensurate with their
credit experience and expertise. As an example, an
officer approving personal loans should not have the
same limits as one approving corporate loans to property
developers. An officer's credit authority may, however,
be increased as he or she develops an acceptable track
record
3.5.3 Als should ensure that credit authority is required for all
types of credit exposures, including the use of credit
derivatives for hedging or income generation.
3.5.4 Credit authority delegated to the Credit Committee and
each credit officer should be subject to regular review to
ensure that it remains appropriate to current market
conditions and the level of their performance.
3.6 Accountability
11
..
V.1 -19.01.01
Management
3.6.1 All staff should comply with laid-down credit policies and
procedures and be held accountable, ultimately to the
Board of Directors through their reporting officers, for
their decisions when discharging their responsibilities.
Thus, for example, if a credit goes into default and on
investigation it transpires that an approval by an officer
did not comply with policies or procedures, the officer
concerned should be counselled, re-trained or
disciplined, as appropriate.
3.6.2 An AI's remuneration policies should be consistent with
its credit risk strategy_ The policies should not
encourage officers to generate short-term profits by
taking an unacceptably high level of risk.
3.6.3 Where the account officer for a credit (or customer
relationship manager, branch manager or similar) moves
on, the incoming officer should carry out a take-over
review. The review should cover inter alia the credit-
worthiness of the borrowers, the adequacy of the
documentation, compliance with covenants,
performance of each loan and the existence and value
of any collateral.
3.7 Staff competence
3.7.1 Als should ensure that staff involved in any credit
activities are competent and fully understand their AI's
strategic direction, policies, tolerance of risk and limits.
3.7.2 The staff concerned should have appropriate
professional qualifications, technical/managerial skills
and experience for their duties. Thus:
senior management should be capable of
managing credit activities;
account officers and credit officers should have a
solid understanding of the credit risk associated
with the products and customers they deal with;
risk management staff should possess sufficient
knowledge in credit risk management;
work-out staff should have adequate experience in
recovering debts and helping customers re-build
financial strength;
12

V.1 - 19.01.01
Management
operations staff should be fully familiar with the
procedures and processes for carrying out all
credit administration tasks; and
internal auditors should fully understand each of
the credit management functions and the risks in
each of them.
3.7.3 Als should ensure that staffing levels are sufficient to
handle present and expected workloads.
3.7.4 Als should encourage their staff and facilitate their
acquisition of the qualifications referred to in para. 3.7.2
above. This can be achieved by in-house training or
through courses for banking staff run by universities or
under the auspices of professional bodies such as the
Hong Kong Institute of Bankers and the Chartered
Institute of Bankers of the United Kingdom or other
professional bodies of similar standing.
3.7.5 Als should also maintain a continuing credit training
programme for staff to update their knowledge of credit-
related issues and risks imposed by changing market
circumstances. The programme may consist of in-house
developed courses, seminars run by professional
associations or both.
4. Prudent procedures for approving credits
4.1 Major principles
4.1.1 Als should have a written statement (credit manual)
setting out the criteria and procedures for granting new
credits, for approving extensions of existing credits and
exceptions, for conducting periodic and independent
reviews of credits granted and for maintaining the
records for credits granted.
4.1.2 The statement should lay down sound, well-defined
criteria for granting credit, including a thorough
understanding of the borrower or counterparty, the
purpose and structure of the credit and its source of
repayment. The same criteria should be applied to both
advised and unadvised facilities.
13

V. 1 - 19.01.01
Management
4.1.3 Als should adhere closely to the "Know Your Customer"
principle and should not lend purely on name and
relationship without a firm understanding of the
borrower.
4.1.4 Credit decisions should be supported by adequate
evaluation of the borrower's repayment ability based on
reliable information. Sufficient and up-to-date
information should continue to be available to enable
effective monitoring of the account.
4 1.5 All credits should be granted on an arm's length basis.
Credits to related borrowers should be monitored
carefully and steps taken to control or reduce the risks of
connected lending.
4.1.6 Als should not over-rely on collateral or guarantees.
While these can provide secondary protection to the
lender if the borrower defaults, the primary consideration
should be the borrower's debt-servicing capacity.
4.1.7 Als should be wary of rapid expansion of particular types
of lending. This may indicate a relaxation of credit
standards and increased focus on more marginal
borrowers.
4.1.8 Als should ensure through periodic independent audits
that the credit approval function is being properly
managed and that credit exposures comply with
prudential standards and internal limits. The results of
such audits should be reported directly to the Board, the
Credit Committee or senior management as appropriate.
4.1.9 Detailed guidance on credit approval is available in .c.B:
.G:.2. "Credit Approval, Review and Records".
14
..
V. 1 -19.01.01
Management
5. Effective systems for credit
measurement and monitoring
administration,
5.1 Credit administration
5.1.1 Als should have systems for administering their credit
portfolios, including keeping the credit files current,
getting up-to-date financial information on borrowers and
other counterparties, funds transfer and safe-keeping of
important documents.
5.2 Measurement and monitoring of credit risk
5.2.1 Als should maintain comprehensive procedures and
adequate information systems for measuring credit risk
(including measuring credit risk of off-balance sheet
products such as derivatives in credit equivalent terms)
and for monitoring the condition of individual credits to
facilitate identification of problem credits and
determination of the adequacy of provisions and
reserves. How elaborate credit risk measurement tools
need to be depends on the complexity and degree of the
inherent risks of the products involved.
5.2.2 Als should have information systems and analytical
techniques that provide sufficient information on the risk
profile and structure of the credit portfolio. These should
be flexible to help Als to identify risk concentrations. To
achieve this, an AI's system should be capable of
analysing its credit portfolio by the following
characteristics:
size of exposure;
exposure to groups of related borrowers;
products;
sectors, e.g. geographic, industrial;
borrowers' demographic profile for consumer
credits, e.g. age or income group, if appropriate;
account performance;
15
.,
V.1 -19.01.01
Management
internal credit ratings
5
;
outstandings versus commitments; and
types and coverage of collateral.
5.2.3 Als should have in place a system for monitoring the
overall quality of their credit risk exposures under normal
and stressful conditions.
5.2.4 There should also be a reporting system which alerts
management to aggregate exposures approaching
various pre-set portfolio limits of the type set out in
subsection 3.2 above.
5.2.5 Als should be conscious of business and economic
cycles and regularly stress-test their portfolios against
adverse market scenarios.
5.2.6 Adequate contingency planning should be developed in
conjunction with stress-testing to cater for situations
where crises develop unexpectedly fast.
5.3 Loan classification
5.3.1 Als should ensure that the loan portfolio is properly
classified and have an effective early-warning system for
problem loans.
5.3.2 As internal ratings are an increasingly important
management and supervisory tool, Als are encouraged
to develop and use internal risk rating systems in
managing credit risk. The rating system should be
consistent with the nature, size and complexity of the
AI's activities.
5.3.3 In using internal risk ratings, Als are recommended to
seek to improve the sophistication of their loan
classification system beyond the 5-grade system
currently employed for regulatory reporting. In particular,
Als are advised to adopt multiple grades for loans that
are not yet irregular and to develop the ability to track the
migration of individual loans through the various internal
credit ratings.
5 This term will hereafter be used inter-changeably throughout this Manual with "internal risk
ratings".
16
."
V. 1 -19.01.01
Management
5.4 Loan provisioning
5.4.1 Als should establish policies on provIsioning which
ensure that loans are prudently provided for on a timely
basis.
5.4.2 Provisions should ideally be assessed on a loan-by-Ioan
basis with full provision being made for the likely loss.
The level of provisions is normally a matter for an AI to
determine in consultation with its external auditors but
the HKMA reserves the discretion to intervene where in
its opinion the AI is being insufficiently prudent in its
approach or is seriously out of line with the provisioning
policy of its peers.
5.4.3 If it is not possible to estimate the loss reliably, the
following provisioning benchmarks may be adopted:
Substandard: 20% - 25% of unsecured portion;
Doubtful: 50% - 75% of unsecured portion; and
Loss: 100% of unsecured portion.
5.4.4 Provisions will comprise specific and general provisions.
Als should provide specifically for credits where losses
are certain or likely. The percentage to be provided will
depend on the particular circumstances. Over and
above this Als should maintain general provisions based
on historical loss experience and their assessment of
future economic trends in the markets in which they
operate.
5.4.5 Further guidance on the above subjects is given in .cR:
G.:a "Credit Administration, Measurement and
Monitoring".
6. Adequate controls over credit risk
6.1 Segregation of duties
6.1.1 Als should keep the functions of credit initiation,
approval, review, administration and work-out as
separate as possible. See also section 2 on how the
credit functions may generally be structured.
6.2 Exception reporting
17
, ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ l ! I ! r . u
V.1 -19.01.01
Management
6.2.1 Als should establish and enforce internal controls and
practices so that deviations from policies, procedures,
limits and prudential guidelines are promptly reported to
the appropriate level of management. This applies inter
alia to the approval of excesses under delegated
authority.
6.2.2 The above should be supported by a management
reporting system whereby relevant reports on the credit
portfolio are generated to various levels of management
on a timely basis.
6.3 Risk mitigation
6.3.1 In controlling credit risk, Als can utilise certain mitigation
techniques. Normally, they include:
accepting collateral, standby letters of credit and
guarantees;
entering into netting arrangements;
setting strict loan covenants; and
using credit derivatives and other hedging
instruments.
6.3.2 In determining which types of credit mitigation
techniques should be used, Als should consider:
their own knowledge and experience in using such
techniques;
cost-effectiveness;
type and financial strength of the counterparties or
issuers;
correlation with the underlying credits;
availability, liquidity and realisability of the credit
mitigation instruments;
the extent to which legally recognised
documentation, e.g. ISDA Master Agreement, can
be adopted; and
the degree of supervisory recognition of the
mitigation technique.
18

V.1 -19.01.01
Management
6.3.3 While mitigation through collateral and guarantees is
usually dealt with at the time of granting of credits, credit
derivatives and netting are often employed after the
credit is in place, or used to manage the overall portfolio
risk.
6.3.4 When the mitigation arrangements are in place they
should then be controlled. Als should have written
policies, procedures and controls for the use of credit
mitigation techniques. They should also ensure
adequate systems are in place to manage these
activities.
6.3.5 Als should revalue their collateral and mitigation
instruments on a regular basis. The method and
frequency of revaluation depends on the nature of the
hedge and the products involved.
6.4 Managing problem credits
6.4.1 It is recommended that Als establish a dedicated unit to
handle the recovery and work-out of problem loans and
put in place policies for the referral of loans to this unit.
6.5 Independent audits
6.5.1 Als should establish a system of regular independent
credit and compliance audits. These audits should be
performed by independent parties, e.g. Internal Audit
and Compliance, which report to the Board or the Audit
Committee.
6.5.2 Credit audits should be conducted to assess individual
credits on a sampling basis and the overall quality of the
credit portfolio. Such audits are useful for evaluating the
performance of account officers and the effectiveness of
the credit process. They can also enable Als to take
early measures to protect their loans.
6.5.3 Compliance audits should be performed to test
compliance with established credit policies and
procedures, in particular credit approval, internal credit
rating, the appropriateness of pricing, adequacy of
provisioning and adherence to limits, statutory
restrictions and operating procedures. Such audits
should also be used to identify credit control or process
19
r@ HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY
.,
V.1 -19.01.01
Management
weaknesses, irregularities and exceptions and to test
whether the reporting of credits to senior management is
accurate as regards composition, credit quality and value
of the portfolio.
6.5.4 The findings of these audits should be reported to the
Board or the Audit Committee on a timely basis, and
appropriate remedial actions should be taken to address
any concerns and weaknesses raised.
Contents Glossary
20
Home Introduction

General Principles of Credit Risk

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

General Principles of Credit Risk

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

General Principles of Credit Risk

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

@ HONG KONG MONETARY AUTHORITY

authority to the Credit Committee

You might also like