0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views4 pages

Marking Criteria For Section A

The document provides marking criteria for two sections - Section A guided writing and Section B literature component. For Section A, it describes the band levels from excellent to very weak in terms of how well the task is fulfilled, language use, sentence structures, vocabulary, and mechanics of writing. For Section B, it also outlines the band levels for excellent to very weak based on fulfilling the task requirements, developing ideas, using evidence from the text, language use, and mechanics of writing. It then provides criteria for summarization bands from excellent to very weak focused on language use, original wording, errors and irrelevant details.

Uploaded by

Terry J. Timothy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views4 pages

Marking Criteria For Section A

The document provides marking criteria for two sections - Section A guided writing and Section B literature component. For Section A, it describes the band levels from excellent to very weak in terms of how well the task is fulfilled, language use, sentence structures, vocabulary, and mechanics of writing. For Section B, it also outlines the band levels for excellent to very weak based on fulfilling the task requirements, developing ideas, using evidence from the text, language use, and mechanics of writing. It then provides criteria for summarization bands from excellent to very weak focused on language use, original wording, errors and irrelevant details.

Uploaded by

Terry J. Timothy
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

MARKING CRITERIA FOR SECTION A GUIDED WRITING BAND EXCELLENT A MARKS DESCRIPTIONS Task fulfilled with ideas and

nd details well21 - 25 developed and well-organised Language is accurate with few minor errors and first draft slips Varied sentence structures are used effectively to convey meaning Vocabulary is apt and widely used Accurate use of mechanics of writing Interest of the reader is aroused and sustained 16 20 Task fulfilled with ideas and details developed and organised Language is largely accurate with some serious and minor errors Simple and compound sentence structures are accurate. Vocabulary is wide enough but lacks precision. Almost always accurate use of spelling, punctuation and paragraphing Interest of the reader is aroused but not sustained Task sufficiently fulfilled with some development of ideas but lacking in details and organisation. Language is sufficiently accurate with frequent serious errors Simple sentence structures are almost always accurate with some attempt at compound sentence structures Vocabulary is sufficiently wide enough to convey meaning Some errors in mechanics of writing Task partially fulfilled as ideas are less developed and lacking in organisation

CREDIT B

ACHIEVEMEN T C

11 15

WEAK D

6 10

Language is barely accurate with frequent serious errors that make meaning blur Vocabulary is limited Serious errors in mechanics of writing VERY WEAK E 1-5 Task hardly fulfilled; ideas lack cohesion High density of errors; meaning is hardly conveyed

MARKING CRITERIA FOR SECTION B LITERATURE COMPONENT BAND EXCELLENT MARKS DESCRIPTIONS 11 Requirements of task fulfilled 12 Ideas and details well-developed, wellorganised with evidence from text Varied sentence structures (simple and compound) Wide and apt vocabulary Accurate use of languageonly first draft slips Accurate mechanics of writing 8 10 Requirements of task fulfilled Ideas and details largely developed, organised and supported with evidence from text Varied sentence structures (simple and compound) Vocabulary wide enough Largely accurate use of languagesome minor errors Largely accurate mechanics of writing Requirements of task fulfilled Ideas and details sufficiently developed with some organisation and supported with some evidence from text Sentence structures lack variety (simple structures dominates) Adequate vocabulary used Sufficiently accurate use of languageserious

CREDIT

ACHIEVEMEN T

57

errors evident Fairly accurate mechanics of writing WEAK 34 Requirements of task partially fulfilled Ideas lack development and organisation with minimal textual support mere narration Sentence structures mostly simple with errors that hamper reading Vocabulary limited Language is barely accurate with errors that hamper reading Inconsistent mechanics of writing Requirements of task hardly fulfilled Hardly any development of relevant ideas or textual support High density of errors; lacks cohesion Vocabulary very limited Mechanics of writing numerous errors

VERY WEAK

1-2

BAND CRITERIA FOR SUMMARY Language BAND EXCELLENT MARKS 5 DESCRIPTIONS Marked ability to use own words Language is accurate; use of simple and compound sentences; appropriate linkers; use of correct grammar Accurate spelling and punctuation First draft slips No lifting of sentences No irrelevant details Ability to use own words Language is largely accurate; use of simple and compound sentences; appropriate linkers; use of correct grammar Spelling and punctuation are largely accurate Some minor errors Almost no lifting of sentences No irrelevant details

CREDIT

ACHIEVEME NT

WEAK

VERY WEAK

Attempts to use own words Language is sufficiently accurate; use of simple and compound sentences (majority of simple sentences) some use of linkers; some serious grammatical errors Some serious errors in spelling and punctuation Selective lifting of sentences Some irrelevant details. No attempt to use own words Frequent serious errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation Linkers hardly use Wholesale lifting of text material Irrelevant details High density of errors fractured syntax Total lifting of text material i.e. transcript Irrelevant details.

You might also like